"When there is more carbon dioxide, the temperature gets warmer". Translation, there is a correlation, not causation. His choice of words is not an accident.
"When there is more carbon dioxide, the temperature gets warmer".
=
When the temperature gets warmer, there is more carbon dioxide.
Note that he's saying a correlation at the time interval "when". He never says "causes".
Frozen continent! Europe's rivers, lakes and even seas are iced over as bitter Siberian cold leads to temperatures of almost -40C
Daily Mail 13th February 2012
Temperatures have plummeted in parts of Europe close to minus 40 degrees Celsius (minus 40 Fahrenheit) in the coldest February snap the region has seen in decades. Meteorologists say it could last till the end of the month
We have experienced many warm and cold periods since the last ice age inc. The Nordic Bronze Age was characterized by a warm climate that began with a climate change around 2700 BC. The warm climate permitted a relatively dense population and good farming, for example grapes were grown in Scandinavia at this time.
Chinese airlines will not pay a charge on carbon emissions imposed by the European Union from January 1
"China, of course, will not cooperate with the European Union on the ETS (emissions trading scheme)," said Chai Haibo, deputy secretary-general of the China Air Transport Association, which represents the country's airlines.
He said the Chinese government was considering "counter-measures" against the European Union
This video is just more misleading propaganda originating with big oil. They want us to keep buying their products and couldn't care less about the future of the planet.
Al Gore's climate scientist studies have shown that capitalist countries CO2 emissions, are 1000000 times more harmful than CO2 emissions from communist countries like China
Its summer (Australia)......Its fucking 20 degrees C right now....... I'm freezing my balls off IN SUMMER!!!! fuck you Al Gore you're full of shit. And boy do I love the media, if just 1 day is 1/2 degree C above average, they start screaming "global warming!!!!" But when its week after week of record low temperatures not a fucking peep out of the Al Gore dick sucking cunts.
a single volcano emits more that 1000 years of human history. But I guess you cannot tax volcanoes...... Would be cool to see al gore make a presentation and everyone there standing up and prooving his "facts" wrong
Al Gore & his carbon gangsters from Wall St emit enough emissions from their lavish polluting lifestyle it makes Gore's communist Chinese polluters green with envy
What is going on in the heads of these climate change fanatics, they look at the ice data ( or do they ? ) which clearly shows a 800 – 1300 year lag between temperature rise and the resulting increase in CO2 and conclude that CO2 drives temperature WTF ? in what universe ? Bankerworld I suspect.
My conclusion, there is no point in entering into a debate with them, you can't win ! They have a belief ( religion ) you only have scientific fact, no contest !! religion wins hands down every time.
"which clearly shows a 800 – 1300 year lag between temperature rise and the resulting increase in CO2 and conclude that CO2 drives temperature WTF ? "
The temp leads CO2 lag crock has been debunked so many times now that I don't even try to argue it with you cretins from Mars
Thank you comrade Gore for jetting around the world warning the world of the dangers of the US's fascist CO2 emissions causing Global Warming that is going to burn the planet up unless we implement carbon taxes on the fascist USA to begin the cool down cycle and save the world. China is a sterling example of environmental stewardship, human rights, and adopting green technologies to save the planet.
Thanks to Al Gore many hundreds of millions now understand that we are putting future generations at risk by continuing to pollute the atmosphere. Business-as-usual is destructive. We MUST change the way we produce and use energy. And for those that want to be critical of Gore, remember that he is NOT the sources of the science. Look to NAS, NASA, AAAS, NCAR, SOCC, AGU, and others. Read what they have been saying for years. There no credible doubt.
@Vacaiable The uninformed, the deceived, and the delusional have doubts. But CREDIBLE doubt is reserved for those with credible evidence to support their opinion. Where's yours?
I rely on what EVERY respected scientific institution has been saying. Do you have anything MORE reliable? Of course you don't. Here's where you can read the position statements of credible scientific bodies.
Google: Scientific Opinion on Climate Change Wikipedia
No, Wiki isn't a source. The statements are accurate.
@ReduceGHGs " I rely on what EVERY respected scientific institution has been saying. " You really are a font of knowledge. Please publish a list here of every institution ( EVERY -note the large letters for emphasise) that publicly as an institution supports the theory of " putting future generations at risk by continuing to pollute the atmosphere etc". You will actually find that very few Universities will take the institutional position you claim, not even the University of East Anglia.
Ok so Al Gore is wrong lets beat him with our monkey sticks. This still does not answer why our climate is warming. When you look at the charts you see the global ice ages. Are we to due to encounter an ice age soon. Why not put our monkey sticks down and find a solution. Let's evolve.
Since when the CO2 content in the air hasn't dropped? Is it since 1958 or since 1800?
How far will this go by denying the problem? If we challenge the problem now it will be much more easy and we will have much more time and opportunities rather than 'in the last minute'.
Let the fossil fuel fans show us one single year that they are able to reduce the CO2 by 1ppm in comparison to the previous year and I will become their greatest fan
The Carbon lobby made a huge PR mistake by calling it "Anthropogenic Global Warming" first, now they are trying to get out of it because all the record low temperatures happening all over, they are trying to change it to "Climate Change".
COLDEST DECEMBER ON RECORD FOR BRITAIN AND IRELAND! BRITAIN AND IRELAND THANK GLOBAL WARMING!
When to move species struggling with climate change
.
As climate changes make native habitats unlivable to plants and animals, these species have two choices: Leave or go extinct.
Now, researchers are offering guidance on when conservationists should undertake the last-ditch strategy of transplanting struggling species to new habitats.
WMO 2011: "Arctic sea-ice cover in December 2010 was the lowest on record.", "In 2010, global average temperature was 0.53°C (0.95°F) above the 1961-90 mean. This value is 0.01°C (0.02°F) above the nominal temperature in 2005, and 0.02°C (0.05°F) above 1998."
Racist, nazi global warming deniers have been lying and telling ignorant people to search "NASA and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration have resisted Freedom of Information Act requests for release of unadjusted raw data and documentation of their adjustments to them" which is a lie being used to smear our plans to implement a carbon tax on the fascist US which will stop global warming and start the global cooling green revolution that China is leading
@JoeJohn90 Because we dont believe in a ridiculous idea backed up with false evidence we are 'racist nazis'? Good job. And even say theoretically that CO2 does cause a rise in temperature, we are responsible for a very small percentage of total emmisions, and a carbon tax will only reduce the levels we emit by an extremely small amount, so we would onlyreduce total CO2 emmisions in the atmosphere by such a small percentage that it would be completely insignificant anyway.
Al Gore's climate scientist studies have shown that capitalist countries CO2 emissions, are 1000000 times more harmful than CO2 emissions from communist countries like China
@JoeJohn90 that doesn't even make fucking sense u asshole! CO2 would be the same wherever u find it, no such thing as "1,000,000X" more harmful!!! wtf u're a dumb dumbcock!!!! BTW, communist China and the country of India combined put out slightly more pollutants including CO2 into the air than does the U.S. Put that in your pipe and smoke it!!!!! ASSHOLE!
The real problem is deforestation and overpopulation. Trees act as a cooling device. We all know planting trees in big cities has a negative effect on global temperatures. India and China should be ashamed of themselves for being overpopulated. They should be apologetic to the rest of us for causing global warming. We should tax their fertility rates and 100 billion of dollars should be transfer annually from these overpopulated countries to Western countries.
John R. Christy has been accused of recanting his position that climate change is neither Anthropogenic nor Catastrophic, but he didn’t. He used two independent data sets, weather balloon and satellite for his findings. (see links in my about me) Later he only stated that there was some anthropogenic impact that could not be predicted 100 years out, but that what we’re doing was good for the plants.
1 /2 Obama stop offshore drilling until it was reinstated. This could cause a $5 a gallon increase, because we would grow dependent upon foreign nations we are not allies with in order to provide our oil. Cap and Trade (American Power Act) would increase gas prices increase by $2.58 a gallon according to George C. Marshall Institute& taxes on the average household up to $3200 according to the RNC Foreign countries price gouge w/ gas prices to $10/gal!.
I'm gonna send this to all my friends for a laugh. Don't worry, they're not stupid enough to believe it because they aren't republicans or easily led children. Peace
The coal burning steam engine was put into operation at Dudley Castle near Coventry in the year 1717. Further humans were burning wood and coal long before that, releasing C02 into the atmosphere.
I do not believe in HUMAN Global Warming, I put emphasis on the human part because i do recognise that there are changes in the global temperature happening, whether they are caused by Humans is another matter entirely. The amount of greenhouses gases that the enitre human population and its activities produce is so small compared with the grander scale of the planet and its atmosphere that I find it hard to believe we could actually be changing the atmosphere so radically.
"The amount of greenhouses gases that the enitre human population and its activities produce is so small compared with the grander scale of the planet and its atmosphere that I find it hard to believe we could actually be changing the atmosphere so radically."
Yes it is so small on the grander scale that the most important greenhouse gas CO2 in the atmosphere has increased by 40% since the beginning of the industrial revolution.
@BeondaPale Why is CO2 the most important greenhouse gas? Surely methane or even water vapour. Thank you also for acknowledging that the amount of CO2 in the atmosphere is negligible. "In 2009, the CO2 global average concentration in Earth's atmosphere was about 0.0387% by volume" Are you seriously telling me that 0.0387% (the figure that you said has already increased by 40%) will cause the planet so many problems? Since when does 0.0387% of something cause anything to happen
@BeondaPale Did you mean strychnine? The amount of CO2 we produce is not enough to cause the changes we are seeing. Human caused Global warming is the real myth. Even if Human Global warming were true, what could we do to stop it. The absurdity to think that if we stop driving cars and live in mud huts will some how save the planet is just backward thinking. Global Warming will happen whether humans are here or not. Its actually quite arrogant to think we are that important.
@BeondaPale Where is the proof that we are producing enough CO2. Changing energy sources is not pratical, as nice as it would to be able to not rely on oil and fossil fuels, the bitter truth is solar, wind and biogas are not pratical alternatives. There is no legitmate proof that we are the main cause for the recent warming of the planet we see now. Im not sure what you were trying say about plants??? I suppose if you like plants that much you could say they are more important than u
@BeondaPale It took micro-organisms millions of years to change the planet's atmosphere, humans have only been industrial since the late 1800s! And cheaper does not mean that it will replace oil if it cannot produce the same amount of energy. You cannot just "yes this is" human gloabl warming is still a theory, meaning it is NOT fact. There are no legitimate measurements that have been accepted by the scientific community as FACT. You seem to spend half your life living under a rock!
@BeondaPale There are other reasons. The fact that you don't seem to comprehend that astounds me. You seem so set in your own little green bubble that you can't accept that maybe what you have been told isn't the whole truth! Millions of years vs 170 you really are off your head, the fact that you believe so stubbornly that humans have produced enough greenhouse gases in 70 years to even begin to compare with almost hundreds of millions of years is crazy. People like you scare me.
"to even begin to compare with almost hundreds of millions of years is crazy."
Not almost - the great oxygenation event took more than a billion years. It did not double or triple the amount of oxygen in our atmosphere, but increased it from almost nothing to 21% (where it stands today).
If what I'm saying is crazy, please use some other explanation as to how the amount of CO2 in our atmosphere has increased by 40% over the last 170 years
"If you had watched the video you would understand as they clearly explained that CO2 lags behind temperature"
the video is part of a POLEMIC documentary called "The Great Global Warming Swindle" This documentary has been found to have misused and even fabricated data, relied on out-of-date research, employed misleading arguments, and misrepresented science
@BeondaPale "This documentary has been found to have misused and even fabricated data, relied on out-of-date research, employed misleading arguments, and misrepresented science" Sounds oddly familiar *An Inconvienent Truth* perhaps?
Most of the country will see a colder-than-usual winter while summer and spring will be relatively cool and dry, according to the time-honored, complex calculations of the "Old Farmer's Almanac."
The 2011 issue of the almanac, which claims to be the nation's oldest continuously published periodical, was released Tuesday. It predicts that in the coming months, the Earth will continue to see a "gradual cooling of the atmosphere"
The scientific debate is over. There is human induced global warming. The vast majority of scientists at every university, in every lab, in every civilized country in the world, believe that there is some level of global warming. The debate now is political! Conservatives perceive Global warming as a liberal cause, and could care less about science. So they are easily duped by junk science. But its not a liberal cause its a scientific one. Open your eyes! Global warming is caused by humans.
Global Warming is as made up as Karma, Mother Nature and Mother Earth.. Only idiots believe in this Garbage.. And I thought Christians are crazy.. LOL
everybody who thinks global warming is just warming of the earth is idiots. global warming can also cause coolingthats what was happening in those 4 decades
hey genius, how about doing some research into what earth's average temp has been for most of it's history. The current temp average is below what's the planet's historic norm is.
have you ever studied paleontology, or biology?
I have, and from what I can see, you're the idiot.
What is especially interesting about Kleiner-Perkins, besides Gore & Republican Colin Powell's involvement, is Kleiner-Perkins/Goldman Sachs investment in the Oil drilling company Terralliance. That's helps to destroy the AGW red cabbages spouting of people's resistance to the AGW Racketeering Operation as "Oil Trolls".
You can also look into the Railroad Engineer who is running the criminal IPCC, Choo Choo Charlie Pachurai's extensive petroleum interests
States take sides in greenhouse gas 'endangerment' brawl.
States took their places in the trenches this week as they joined the court fight either for or against U.S. EPA's "endangerment" finding for greenhouse gases
Severe weather in Australia, parts of which have been hit by a 10-year drought, has heightened public concern over climate change.
Western Australia has sweated through its hottest ever summer, recording average temperatures just shy of 30 degrees Celsius, officials said on Monday.
if this is the best they come up with using bioethanol as feul than please drive v8 till every last drip is gone, and our oil addiction is finaly over. they wan't us to drive economic cars, but instead driving on water it must be oil based, you will see the more efficient our cars will drive the more expencive the oilprice. so please take hummer and end the shit
Follow the money. Gore & his Goldman Sachs business partners (the enemy of the working/middleclass) have set up companies to "promote" their scam, funnel money to "influence" the results they want, then companies set up to "Cash in" on the criminal enterprise. All players involved in this criminal racket should be ensnared under RICO statutes. If enough of us had the gumption of our forefathers, these scumbags would be on ice by now
China, the world's largest emitter of heat-trapping greenhouse gases, has said it will cut its "carbon intensity" - a measure of carbon dioxide emissions per unit of production - by 40 percent to 45 percent by 2020, compared with 2005 levels.
funny how the news in europe says the states are the biggest emitter china 2nd.
here in holland situation is getting fucked up our deltaworks to protect us from the sea where calculated in 50'till 70's for a spring flood of 4 meters but now i have seen the rapports about sea level rising the maximum 10 years ago they said maximum 40 cm's in 100 years, now they say maximum 120 cm in 100 years.
level rising since the 70's is 30 cm till now. we are now living 2 meters below sea level
Civil and criminal cases against such climate fraudsters including key crooks Professor Phil Jones, chief climatologists at the UKs Climatic Research Unit (CRU), University of East Anglia, Professor Michael E. Mann of Penn. State University and that old eco-warrior, former U.S. vice president, Al Gore.
The civil litigation net will soon be cast far and wide in the U.S. skilfully applying the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO).
Climate change causes more frequent and severe snowstorms. Record snowstorms need two things: temperatures below freezing, and very high humidity.
On a planet warmer by a few degrees on average, the Northeast US will still have plenty of days below freezing; the big difference will be warmer seas producing higher levels of moisture in the air — and therefore more severe cold-season storms.
@Nightversionn you are an idiot! No really you are an idiot of immense proportions....kill yourself idiot! You can't have it both ways. When it doesn't snow you say global warming...when it snows it's global warming. How futile can your arguement get?
Al Gore established his own global-warming group, the Alliance for Climate Protection The group favors more stringent environmental policy regulations on the private sector and especially wants cap-and-trade legislation so that companies will be forced to buy carbon credits
Gore is chairman of the board which also includes Clinton EPA Director Carol Browner President George H.W. Bushs National Security Advisor Brent Scowcroft & Reagan-era EPA Director Lee Thomas
"The Himalayas are important not only for the people of Nepal but for 1.3 billion people who depend on waters from the mountains for their livelihoods," said Nepal's Prime Minister Madhav Kumar Nepal at the cabinet meeting broadcast live by state-owned Nepal Television.
The melting of the glaciers in the mountains due to global warming would bring about a scarcity of water in the river systems in South Asia, affecting more than a billion people in Nepal, India, Pakistan, Bangladesh and China..
Al Gore was one of the architects of two of the most anti-American, anti-human rights, & anti-environmental legislation in the history of the United States. He was in office when NAFTA & GATT expansion to the WTO happened.
Multiple tens of millions of jobs that paid good wages were shipped to Al Gore's Marxist friends in China & the third world so that corporations who greased Gore's pockets could exploit the Environment & Human Rights & stuff their fat pockets with money
to back to sleep goog, oops you are "hibernating" already..... plastic from YOUR computer to blame goog not to mention you appear full of gore's hot air! Paul j. L'Heureux on fb am i ;} Pavel Shovelindasky on the peoplescube
9 of last 10 years were the HOTTEST on record. 2009 = 2nd HOTTEST on record Solar irradiance is at 35 year low Search: Data @ NASA GISS: Surface Temperature Analysis: Graphs & NASA GISS Do Variations in the Solar Cycle Latest on YouTube: It's so Cold, there can't be Global Warming /watch?v=sAvqabAPIr4&feature=sub 50% of arctic sea ice has disappeared in just 30 years. Plants, animals & insects are all migrating north. Search: Climate Change: NASA's Eyes on the Earth
Human-caused global warming easily overwhelms much-hyped "cold snap"
February 5, 2010
"The global-average lower tropospheric temperature anomaly soared to +0.72 deg. C in January, 2010. This is the warmest January in the 32-year satellite-based data record."
To see the graph of the "UAH Globally Averaged Satellite-Based Temperature of the Lower Atmosphere, 1979-2010"
Its odd. There is no upward trend from 1975 to mid 1990s as with ground global temperature graphs. Only a step upward around 2000 and then perhaps a flat trend since.
More Than 700 International Scientists Dissent Over Man-Made Global Warming Claims
700 dissenting scientists from around the globe challenged man-made global warming claims made by the UN IPCC & Al Gore This new 2009 U.S. Senate Minority Report -- updated from 2007s-features the skeptical voices of over 700 prominent international scientists, including many current and former UN IPCC scientists, who have now turned against the UN IPCC AGW claims
Oh, sorry Dmac, you're right! All the temperature figures are faked, and the WeatherChannel, NASA, NOAA, MIT, Univ.of California, Harvard, Cambridge, the American Geophysical Union, The Royal Society, Union of Concerned Scientists are all part of the conspiracy.
Except no one told the disappearing arctic ice, melting mountain glaciers, and the plants, animals, and insects all migrating north.
In just FIVE YEARS between 2004-2009 thick perennial arctic sea ice DROPPED 42%. This was discovered by NASA satellite measurements. Reported 7/7/09
Search:
New NASA Satellite Survey Reveals Dramatic Arctic Sea Ice Thinning
Global Warming is changing our world NOW. CO2 is 35% above levels for 650,000 years. In just 30 years CO2 will be over 450ppm, enough to acidify oceans to the point of stopping the growth of many planktons and corals. They are at the base of the oceans' food chain.
Bullshit, the only truth is that the alien robots from planet niburu are going to cause global warming which is why we need 96% of our income taxed....If we don't give the government all of our income the alien robots are going to enslave us all and rape you in the ass gay or not.....
The CLIMATEDEPOT(dot)com website has some great new articles on all the scandals & malfeasance occuring daily at the IPCC & the GW scam
Open magazine has "The Climate Change Fraud" on its cover
The question now is, not that AGW is occuring, but how many people are going to be charged, & is this Al Gore's last flimflam scam?
Maybe Choo Choo Charlie & Al Gore can do the honorable thing & wrap their heads in Saran wrap & ring Marshal Applewhite for the UFO Taxi Service to Nibiru
Science has prevailed on the issue of global warming, 3,000 of the best scientists in the world have issued 4 reports all unanimous that global warming is happening, and the last called the cause unequivocal.
There are still some people who will believe anything, and others who will argue for the oil companies (oil trolls), we do not take them seriously any more than we do people from the flat earth society.
The consensus on the science is as settled as it ever gets in science.
The Science of Global Warming is settled. The next time you hear this, reply "YAD061".
Google YAD061
Link Al Gore & Global Warming charade with the economic destruction of NAFTA, GATT, & WTO creation, which all happened under the Clinton/Gore presidency
Also remind people that the People's Democracy of China is sending its slave labor made junk back to us that have toxic chemicals in them that are making us & our children sick & dying!
Remind them of the environmental damage of Free Trade
I hold Al Fraud Gore partly to blame for NAFTA & GATT/WTO which besides the vast horrendous economic & cultural devastation inflicted upon the working/middleclass, was a disaster environmentally. Relocating Industry from the West that had Environmental & Human Rights laws to countries that have little to none Who benefits? The corporations who backed Clinton/Goreflake and inundated them, their administration, & their friends in the Republican party with loads of money & gifts to get it passed
The Christmas season got going with widespread snowfall that buried the nation's capital under almost 2 feet of snow. Dallas, which hasn't experienced a storm of blizzard proportions in 80 years, got socked with record snowfall. On Christmas Eve, half of the United States was covered with snow, according to an image that the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration released.
You've all drunk the koolaid. This is from the movie "The Big Swindle" - revealed to be the biggest hoax and play on numbers ever broadcast on television - with THEE agenda of all - to be controversial, stir up doubt, and get an audience. All these beloved graphs are all bunk, if you have the guts to see the truth check out the "Climate Deniers Crock" postings on YouTube, specifically this one, dealing exactly with what you just watched here: v=boj9ccV9htk Debunked, but will YOU change? no
@Nightversionn they've turned more severe in the last several hundred years? or are we just better at seeing them? man made global warming is a lie. the planet is not in dire need of us doing anything. it warms and cools without our help.
@Nightversionn Whilst it is easy to identify droughts and wildfires with global warming, not so intuitive is the relation to snow storms, floods and cyclones. The centre of Greenland is one of the coldest places on the planet yet not very much snow falls each year. That is because there is little water vapor left in the atmosphere by the time the air reaches the centre. With the warming oceans more water evaporates from the oceans resulting in more snowfall and flooding.
arm waving and pie-in-the-sky proposals won't work. Read Science and see how all of these things are backfiring and potentially making it worse. CO2 is not a pollutant-man only contribute 4.3% total of it to the atmosphere. The rest is all natural.
mauiluver: Wrong! Man-made CO2 is currently added annually 130 times more than all the breathing volcanos on earth combined, to the magnitude of an equivalent 8000 Mount Kilhuea's popping up and breathing. Plant life tries to tackle it every year, but can't take it all away, causing the net increase (can't catch up, like a filter system that's overburdened) and on it goes. All it takes is this tipping of a balance, and we have easily reached that now.
@mauiluver yes that's a scientific argument - only <5% so can't cause problems...try drinking a glass of water with 0.0001% of copper in it...you'll be fine as copper in small doses is essential for you...then keep adding a bit more each day...see what happens to you after a few months...
@mauiluver good video. But to we really only contribue 4.3% to the co2 in the atmosphere? Ive heard that the ammount of co2 in the atmosphere has doubled the last 50 years. Wouldnt that mean we have contributed more than 4.3% or has the increase of co2 come from elsewhere? I still dont belive the co2 has much impact on the climate as whole
@TheNewOldVeteran I do agree that we shouldn't be polluting the air, I don't believe global warming is real. But I'm also not talking about co2 as a pollutant. I think there are ways of doing things better and that those steps should be taken, but just for a cleaner more natural planet not because of global warming. So I agree with you on that, just probably not the same way.
The models used by IPCC are badly flawed and that's all they have left. They have quietly gotten rid of the hockey stick graph because it only used cherry picked data and left out most of the relevant data. Only Gore still touts it and he's making a fortune.
He's VP of a company that sells carbon credits, he's in on the electric car scam and charges 200,000 to speak. Altruistic huh.
His mansion power bill is shown to be larger than most small towns. SCAM
They certainly are. I was referring to the pile of cash Al got from the US Gov't that went into an electric car company in Europe.
Now guess who's a major shareholder in that little enterprise. Yup...Our pal Al. Same guy that buys his Carbon Credits from his own company but oh...doesn't actually buy them as they are provided as an employee perk. Als done quite well for himself with the whole AGW scam and he's busily rounding up every big buck investor he can.
electric cars came about during the same time as gas engine vehicles. The advertising won over to the side of gas engines and electric cars were lost and swept under the rug. MONEY MONEY MONEY. Why don't people EVER understand. It's about the MONEY.
Not quite. Range was poor on Electric Vehicles back then and for the most part that problem is not solved. This is why Extended Range Electric Vehicles are the future. Think plug-in Hybrid but the generator can be anything. Solar cells, compressed natural gas, Hydrogen fuel cells, anything really which can produce electricity cleanly and efficiently.
Algore worked a deal giving "Fisker Motors" $500,000,000.00 in U.S. tax money to build electric cars that retail for $100,000.00 each.
The company says it will outsource all of the building of the cars to another company in Finland and Denmark. So your tax dollars are going out of the country to prop up companies that are going to support the Scandanavian economies.
I have to wonder how much of that 500 million is going to Gores personal accounts.
i'm at 0:35. video is already bollocks. yes temp was already rising, but humans are having a rapidly increasing impact on the whole. see the sharp increase after 1900? effects of industrial revolution. as for the post war economic boom, lets face it, werent as many economically active polluting grown men in the world. also germany is no longer a world superpower at this point, + so less emissions. point is, if u look at that graph when it leads up to more recent years, human impact is obvious.
As a scientist I was taught that "Correlation is not Causation." Everyone agrees that 80% of green house gas is water vapor. Man contributes about 5% of the carbon dioxide by weight into the atmosphere every year. 20% of the remaining green house gas after water vapor is CO2, then man contributes less than 1% of the global warming gases (0.20 x 0.05). If man put zero CO2 into the atmosphere, that would lower the CO2 in the air by only four thousandth of one percent. Bill
Ok mauliver, seems you know what you're talking about here, but I'm kinda lost. How did you reach four thousandth of one percent with those calculations? At the moment I am looking to write up a dissertation on whether mankind is affecting climate change significantly, or whether global warming is a natural process of which we have very little control over or effect upon. I have to compare and contrast 3 articles of different views, and really I need all the background knowledge I can get.
@mauiluver I am a scientist in progress yet, but i can think of this.. what makes us believe 5% is not a great impact? our limited brains tend do rationalize quantities by our standards of what is a lot or too little but, does nature comands itself by these same standards? Of course not. Maybe a 0.03%could make the difference. I'm into the anti-reductionism cientific flow. Natural laws are not always based on math models, i think. I would give Gore a little credit.
@mauiluver gee your smart - you must be a mathematician. 5% of natural level every year huhhh? That would only take 20 years to reach what is already there then....why do people who can't do math think they can beat all the published scientists in argument...go back to speical school you moron
How egotistical of you to think that we, the human kind can actually change nature..
Can you tell me how the temperature increased before there were any hummers or humans? Was it perhaps the methane released by Dinosaurs?? Meanwhile, we'll all start riding around in bicycles and using candles and wood to cook- no more electricity..
You go first. Get rid of your car and all the electricity in your home and we'll follow.
aldridkg, i hardly think i'm being egotystical. Of course i don't think that we humans alone are responsible for global warming, that would be absurd. At the time of my first comment on this video, I did strongly believe that mankind had made a real impact on the already occurring natural process of global warming. However, as I've looked further into the subject, I'm not so sure of whether human impact is in fact significant. And as for your last statement - Would you follow? Really?
Well, it looks like you have actually considered rationality vs. blind emotionalism on this matter. While there is not one person out there that would disagree with our need to conserve, recycle, etc. we disagree at the expense of regressing in our living standards. For example, we have no problem using alternative fuels if there were any & dat were affordable. Forcing people to go from cars to bicycles by taxing them to death is not going to work, simply because it's unfair & repressive.
This has been flagged as spam show
"When there is more carbon dioxide, the temperature gets warmer". Translation, there is a correlation, not causation. His choice of words is not an accident.
"When there is more carbon dioxide, the temperature gets warmer".
=
When the temperature gets warmer, there is more carbon dioxide.
Note that he's saying a correlation at the time interval "when". He never says "causes".
He's an unctuous slime ball.
LucisFerre1 1 day ago
Comment removed
LucisFerre1 1 day ago
jawn
painterQjensen 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Global Cooling News
Frozen continent! Europe's rivers, lakes and even seas are iced over as bitter Siberian cold leads to temperatures of almost -40C
Daily Mail 13th February 2012
Temperatures have plummeted in parts of Europe close to minus 40 degrees Celsius (minus 40 Fahrenheit) in the coldest February snap the region has seen in decades. Meteorologists say it could last till the end of the month
RandomVersion 2 weeks ago
can you not see any kind of similarity in those two lines
Danshro 1 month ago
4:06 are you cereal
Danshro 1 month ago
We have experienced many warm and cold periods since the last ice age inc. The Nordic Bronze Age was characterized by a warm climate that began with a climate change around 2700 BC. The warm climate permitted a relatively dense population and good farming, for example grapes were grown in Scandinavia at this time.
ItsTheSunStupid 1 month ago
@ndrthrdr1
good arguement..... next time make a valid point.
MrPurplefood 1 month ago
China airlines refuse to pay EU carbon charge
Chinese airlines will not pay a charge on carbon emissions imposed by the European Union from January 1
"China, of course, will not cooperate with the European Union on the ETS (emissions trading scheme)," said Chai Haibo, deputy secretary-general of the China Air Transport Association, which represents the country's airlines.
He said the Chinese government was considering "counter-measures" against the European Union
RandomVersion 1 month ago
This video is just more misleading propaganda originating with big oil. They want us to keep buying their products and couldn't care less about the future of the planet.
ndrthrdr1 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Evidence / impacts of climate change series...(read it before the denier with all the sock puppet channels tries to censor it)..
.
Carbon dioxide offsets used to be a hot topic. What happened?
.
Just a few years ago, it seemed carbon offsetting might be one of the best responses to society's emissions-heavy habits.
.
Winnipeg Free Press, Manitoba
17 December 2011
Nightversionn 2 months ago
Mount Kilimanjaro is an active volcano
Nathan21122012 2 months ago
@Nathan21122012
Where you got that from?
Kilimanjaro, with its three volcanic cones, Kibo, Mawenzi, and Shira, is a dormant volcano.
According to wikipedia. dormant does not mean active.
2nadalfederer1 3 weeks ago
Al Gore's climate scientist studies have shown that capitalist countries CO2 emissions, are 1000000 times more harmful than CO2 emissions from communist countries like China
JoeJohn90 2 months ago 3
/watch?v=Z7XxUzRTHpA
evilmeerkat007 2 months ago
Its summer (Australia)......Its fucking 20 degrees C right now....... I'm freezing my balls off IN SUMMER!!!! fuck you Al Gore you're full of shit. And boy do I love the media, if just 1 day is 1/2 degree C above average, they start screaming "global warming!!!!" But when its week after week of record low temperatures not a fucking peep out of the Al Gore dick sucking cunts.
MrHangbush 3 months ago
a single volcano emits more that 1000 years of human history. But I guess you cannot tax volcanoes...... Would be cool to see al gore make a presentation and everyone there standing up and prooving his "facts" wrong
Veikra 3 months ago
@Veikra
"a single volcano emits more that 1000 years of human history."
Emits more what tha(n)t 1000 years of human history?
BeondaPale 3 months ago
@BeondaPale yes thank you. I made the mistake of not rereading what I wrote. Also, not my native language
Veikra 3 months ago
@Veikra
Let me try to help.
"a single volcano emits more (orange juice) than 1000 years of human history."
"a single volcano emits more (jokes) than 1000 years of human history."
"a single volcano emits more (CO2) than 1000 years of human history."
all of these are full sentences, but none of these are true
BeondaPale 3 months ago
Al Gore & his carbon gangsters from Wall St emit enough emissions from their lavish polluting lifestyle it makes Gore's communist Chinese polluters green with envy
ChristopherMonckton5 3 months ago
Clara's Goog2k account has been suspended, the lord's work. Hallelujah!
ShockofClara 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
veja tambem A grande farsa do aquecimento global
RAY1953SIL 3 months ago
What is going on in the heads of these climate change fanatics, they look at the ice data ( or do they ? ) which clearly shows a 800 – 1300 year lag between temperature rise and the resulting increase in CO2 and conclude that CO2 drives temperature WTF ? in what universe ? Bankerworld I suspect.
My conclusion, there is no point in entering into a debate with them, you can't win ! They have a belief ( religion ) you only have scientific fact, no contest !! religion wins hands down every time.
algorithm21century 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@algorithm21century
"which clearly shows a 800 – 1300 year lag between temperature rise and the resulting increase in CO2 and conclude that CO2 drives temperature WTF ? "
The temp leads CO2 lag crock has been debunked so many times now that I don't even try to argue it with you cretins from Mars
watch?v=8nrvrkVBt24
BeondaPale 3 months ago
Thank you comrade Gore for jetting around the world warning the world of the dangers of the US's fascist CO2 emissions causing Global Warming that is going to burn the planet up unless we implement carbon taxes on the fascist USA to begin the cool down cycle and save the world. China is a sterling example of environmental stewardship, human rights, and adopting green technologies to save the planet.
JoeJohn90 4 months ago
@JoeJohn90 "comrade" Gore? LOL!
Gore has done more to raise awareness than anyone. Get real. Try reading a book or two about this issue before posting more babble. Ugh!
ReduceGHGs 4 months ago
Thanks to Al Gore many hundreds of millions now understand that we are putting future generations at risk by continuing to pollute the atmosphere. Business-as-usual is destructive. We MUST change the way we produce and use energy. And for those that want to be critical of Gore, remember that he is NOT the sources of the science. Look to NAS, NASA, AAAS, NCAR, SOCC, AGU, and others. Read what they have been saying for years. There no credible doubt.
ReduceGHGs 5 months ago
@ReduceGHGs Yes there is, in fact there is a great deal of credible doubt.
Vacaiable 4 months ago
@Vacaiable The uninformed, the deceived, and the delusional have doubts. But CREDIBLE doubt is reserved for those with credible evidence to support their opinion. Where's yours?
I rely on what EVERY respected scientific institution has been saying. Do you have anything MORE reliable? Of course you don't. Here's where you can read the position statements of credible scientific bodies.
Google: Scientific Opinion on Climate Change Wikipedia
No, Wiki isn't a source. The statements are accurate.
ReduceGHGs 4 months ago
@ReduceGHGs " I rely on what EVERY respected scientific institution has been saying. " You really are a font of knowledge. Please publish a list here of every institution ( EVERY -note the large letters for emphasise) that publicly as an institution supports the theory of " putting future generations at risk by continuing to pollute the atmosphere etc". You will actually find that very few Universities will take the institutional position you claim, not even the University of East Anglia.
Vacaiable 3 months ago
@Vacaiable .
You can research this but here is a Wiki site that has many of the respected scientific institutions' position statements.
Google: Scientific Opinion on Climate Change Wikipedia
Wiki isn't a source but the statements are accurate and there are links for additional research.
As for East Anglia email issue, apparently you haven't kept up.
Google: Sixth Independent Investigation Clears "Climategate" Scientists
If you need more help or links just ask.
ReduceGHGs 3 months ago
Ok so Al Gore is wrong lets beat him with our monkey sticks. This still does not answer why our climate is warming. When you look at the charts you see the global ice ages. Are we to due to encounter an ice age soon. Why not put our monkey sticks down and find a solution. Let's evolve.
lazyorc 5 months ago
RE: 'The climate change'
The climate is always changing, but:
Since when the CO2 content in the air hasn't dropped? Is it since 1958 or since 1800?
How far will this go by denying the problem? If we challenge the problem now it will be much more easy and we will have much more time and opportunities rather than 'in the last minute'.
Let the fossil fuel fans show us one single year that they are able to reduce the CO2 by 1ppm in comparison to the previous year and I will become their greatest fan
U1T001 6 months ago
The Carbon lobby made a huge PR mistake by calling it "Anthropogenic Global Warming" first, now they are trying to get out of it because all the record low temperatures happening all over, they are trying to change it to "Climate Change".
COLDEST DECEMBER ON RECORD FOR BRITAIN AND IRELAND! BRITAIN AND IRELAND THANK GLOBAL WARMING!
DaveGibbagglers 6 months ago
Evidence / impacts of climate change series…
.
When to move species struggling with climate change
.
As climate changes make native habitats unlivable to plants and animals, these species have two choices: Leave or go extinct.
Now, researchers are offering guidance on when conservationists should undertake the last-ditch strategy of transplanting struggling species to new habitats.
.
LiveScience
25 July 2011
Nightversionn 6 months ago
82-90% of all statistics are made up on the spot.
MrJackdermody7 7 months ago
if you pause this video at 2.20 you will see the graph behind him goes backwars since wen do u we go back in time your an idiot Al Gore
OlLiEThEkIlLeR12 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
WMO 2011: "Arctic sea-ice cover in December 2010 was the lowest on record.", "In 2010, global average temperature was 0.53°C (0.95°F) above the 1961-90 mean. This value is 0.01°C (0.02°F) above the nominal temperature in 2005, and 0.02°C (0.05°F) above 1998."
checkyoursources 9 months ago
Racist, nazi global warming deniers have been lying and telling ignorant people to search "NASA and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration have resisted Freedom of Information Act requests for release of unadjusted raw data and documentation of their adjustments to them" which is a lie being used to smear our plans to implement a carbon tax on the fascist US which will stop global warming and start the global cooling green revolution that China is leading
JoeJohn90 9 months ago
@JoeJohn90 Because we dont believe in a ridiculous idea backed up with false evidence we are 'racist nazis'? Good job. And even say theoretically that CO2 does cause a rise in temperature, we are responsible for a very small percentage of total emmisions, and a carbon tax will only reduce the levels we emit by an extremely small amount, so we would onlyreduce total CO2 emmisions in the atmosphere by such a small percentage that it would be completely insignificant anyway.
IHateRap1991 7 months ago
Ah, Science! Better than Religion, especially the Global Warming Political-Religion!
*Thumbs Up* for Science! It smashes and wholly obliterates the lies of all the rest!
Take that, Al Gore, you anti-Science sheeple-herder! Thinking and Intelligence for the Win!
WinstonSmith6079 10 months ago
Al Gore's climate scientist studies have shown that capitalist countries CO2 emissions, are 1000000 times more harmful than CO2 emissions from communist countries like China
JoeJohn90 1 year ago
@JoeJohn90 that doesn't even make fucking sense u asshole! CO2 would be the same wherever u find it, no such thing as "1,000,000X" more harmful!!! wtf u're a dumb dumbcock!!!! BTW, communist China and the country of India combined put out slightly more pollutants including CO2 into the air than does the U.S. Put that in your pipe and smoke it!!!!! ASSHOLE!
SvenStadt 9 months ago
The real problem is deforestation and overpopulation. Trees act as a cooling device. We all know planting trees in big cities has a negative effect on global temperatures. India and China should be ashamed of themselves for being overpopulated. They should be apologetic to the rest of us for causing global warming. We should tax their fertility rates and 100 billion of dollars should be transfer annually from these overpopulated countries to Western countries.
isocrate27 1 year ago
John R. Christy has been accused of recanting his position that climate change is neither Anthropogenic nor Catastrophic, but he didn’t. He used two independent data sets, weather balloon and satellite for his findings. (see links in my about me) Later he only stated that there was some anthropogenic impact that could not be predicted 100 years out, but that what we’re doing was good for the plants.
Angellicationify 1 year ago
2/2 watch?v=bgKr480RYc4 Obama's Former Green Jobs Czar and Communist, Van Jones
Admits Left is 'PRETENDING' Need for Regulations in Green Movement
Angellicationify 1 year ago
1 /2 Obama stop offshore drilling until it was reinstated. This could cause a $5 a gallon increase, because we would grow dependent upon foreign nations we are not allies with in order to provide our oil. Cap and Trade (American Power Act) would increase gas prices increase by $2.58 a gallon according to George C. Marshall Institute& taxes on the average household up to $3200 according to the RNC Foreign countries price gouge w/ gas prices to $10/gal!.
.
Allen West 2012
Angellicationify 1 year ago
who ever made this video are retards!
randcs1954 1 year ago
This shits fucking retarded.
I'm gonna send this to all my friends for a laugh. Don't worry, they're not stupid enough to believe it because they aren't republicans or easily led children. Peace
MyShurikenInYour 1 year ago
....Manbearpig is super real... i'm super.. duper.. cereal.
ToeKneeWithAWhy 1 year ago 17
I would call that pwnd.
What I think is funny about Al Gore's graph is that at 2:19, it goes back in time :-)
sciencoking 1 year ago
The coal burning steam engine was put into operation at Dudley Castle near Coventry in the year 1717. Further humans were burning wood and coal long before that, releasing C02 into the atmosphere.
gwheyduke 1 year ago
temperature is causing the CO2 to rise, not the other way around
Grivahri 1 year ago
I do not believe in HUMAN Global Warming, I put emphasis on the human part because i do recognise that there are changes in the global temperature happening, whether they are caused by Humans is another matter entirely. The amount of greenhouses gases that the enitre human population and its activities produce is so small compared with the grander scale of the planet and its atmosphere that I find it hard to believe we could actually be changing the atmosphere so radically.
MrApplesucksass 1 year ago 6
@MrApplesucksass i agree
Sugardaddy501 3 months ago
@MrApplesucksass
"The amount of greenhouses gases that the enitre human population and its activities produce is so small compared with the grander scale of the planet and its atmosphere that I find it hard to believe we could actually be changing the atmosphere so radically."
Yes it is so small on the grander scale that the most important greenhouse gas CO2 in the atmosphere has increased by 40% since the beginning of the industrial revolution.
You can go back to ignoring this fact now
BeondaPale 3 months ago
@BeondaPale Why is CO2 the most important greenhouse gas? Surely methane or even water vapour. Thank you also for acknowledging that the amount of CO2 in the atmosphere is negligible. "In 2009, the CO2 global average concentration in Earth's atmosphere was about 0.0387% by volume" Are you seriously telling me that 0.0387% (the figure that you said has already increased by 40%) will cause the planet so many problems? Since when does 0.0387% of something cause anything to happen
MrApplesucksass 3 months ago
@MrApplesucksass
"Why is CO2 the most important greenhouse gas? Surely methane or even water vapour."
Why is water vapor not considered when factoring atmospheric concentrations of gasses?
What is the corrent concentration of methane in our atmosphere?
"Since when does 0.0387% of something cause anything to happen?"
If you had a concentration of .0387% of strichnine in your blood - what would happen to you?
BeondaPale 3 months ago
@BeondaPale Did you mean strychnine? The amount of CO2 we produce is not enough to cause the changes we are seeing. Human caused Global warming is the real myth. Even if Human Global warming were true, what could we do to stop it. The absurdity to think that if we stop driving cars and live in mud huts will some how save the planet is just backward thinking. Global Warming will happen whether humans are here or not. Its actually quite arrogant to think we are that important.
MrApplesucksass 3 months ago
@MrApplesucksass
Did you mean strychnine? -Yes.
"The amount of CO2 we produce is not enough..." -Yes it is. What changes are we seeing?
"what could we do to stop it." -Change energy sources.
"The absurdity..." -Who said anything about either?
"Global Warming will happen whether..." -True, but not necessarily to the extent that we are causing it to happen now
"Its actually quite arrogant..." - oxygen is in the air because of plants. Are we less important than plants?
BeondaPale 3 months ago
@BeondaPale Where is the proof that we are producing enough CO2. Changing energy sources is not pratical, as nice as it would to be able to not rely on oil and fossil fuels, the bitter truth is solar, wind and biogas are not pratical alternatives. There is no legitmate proof that we are the main cause for the recent warming of the planet we see now. Im not sure what you were trying say about plants??? I suppose if you like plants that much you could say they are more important than u
MrApplesucksass 3 months ago
@MrApplesucksass
"Where is the proof..." -In the measurements and math
"solar, wind and biogas are not.." -nano solar is expected to be cheaper than fossil in 10 years, we are running out of oil and oil causes terrorism
"There is no legitimate proof..." - yes there is
"Im not sure what you were trying say about plants???" - that if plants have changed our atmosphere, why can't we?
BeondaPale 3 months ago
@BeondaPale It took micro-organisms millions of years to change the planet's atmosphere, humans have only been industrial since the late 1800s! And cheaper does not mean that it will replace oil if it cannot produce the same amount of energy. You cannot just "yes this is" human gloabl warming is still a theory, meaning it is NOT fact. There are no legitimate measurements that have been accepted by the scientific community as FACT. You seem to spend half your life living under a rock!
MrApplesucksass 3 months ago
@MrApplesucksass
"It took micro-organisms millions of years to change the planet's atmosphere,"
And in that time they changed the atmosphere dramatically
"humans have only been industrial since the late 1800s"
Early 1800's - and we've burned A WHOLE LOT in the last 170 years, but mostly just in the last century
"You cannot just "yes this is" human gloabl warming is still a theory, meaning it is NOT fact."
There is no other LOGICAL explanation - do you know logic?
BeondaPale 3 months ago
@BeondaPale There are other reasons. The fact that you don't seem to comprehend that astounds me. You seem so set in your own little green bubble that you can't accept that maybe what you have been told isn't the whole truth! Millions of years vs 170 you really are off your head, the fact that you believe so stubbornly that humans have produced enough greenhouse gases in 70 years to even begin to compare with almost hundreds of millions of years is crazy. People like you scare me.
MrApplesucksass 2 months ago
@MrApplesucksass
"to even begin to compare with almost hundreds of millions of years is crazy."
Not almost - the great oxygenation event took more than a billion years. It did not double or triple the amount of oxygen in our atmosphere, but increased it from almost nothing to 21% (where it stands today).
If what I'm saying is crazy, please use some other explanation as to how the amount of CO2 in our atmosphere has increased by 40% over the last 170 years
BeondaPale 2 months ago
@BeondaPale The reason we see increased CO2 in the Earth's atmosphere is because of the Medieval Warm Period which occurred more than 800 years ago.
MrApplesucksass 2 months ago
@MrApplesucksass
"...because of the Medieval Warm Period... "
How?
BeondaPale 2 months ago
@BeondaPale If you had watched the video you would understand as they clearly explained that CO2 lags behind temperature
MrApplesucksass 2 months ago
@MrApplesucksass
"If you had watched the video you would understand as they clearly explained that CO2 lags behind temperature"
the video is part of a POLEMIC documentary called "The Great Global Warming Swindle" This documentary has been found to have misused and even fabricated data, relied on out-of-date research, employed misleading arguments, and misrepresented science
To see how this documentary did this:
watch?v=boj9ccV9htk
BeondaPale 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@BeondaPale "This documentary has been found to have misused and even fabricated data, relied on out-of-date research, employed misleading arguments, and misrepresented science" Sounds oddly familiar *An Inconvienent Truth* perhaps?
MrApplesucksass 2 months ago
what kind of morons make suck deliberate crap like this.
Tradd9 1 year ago 3
@Tradd9 morons that like money and being in control.
Xiochic 1 year ago
• Farmer's Almanac: Global cooling to continue
Most of the country will see a colder-than-usual winter while summer and spring will be relatively cool and dry, according to the time-honored, complex calculations of the "Old Farmer's Almanac."
The 2011 issue of the almanac, which claims to be the nation's oldest continuously published periodical, was released Tuesday. It predicts that in the coming months, the Earth will continue to see a "gradual cooling of the atmosphere"
Dayversion 1 year ago
fail at 0:33
rakketakke 1 year ago
The scientific debate is over. There is human induced global warming. The vast majority of scientists at every university, in every lab, in every civilized country in the world, believe that there is some level of global warming. The debate now is political! Conservatives perceive Global warming as a liberal cause, and could care less about science. So they are easily duped by junk science. But its not a liberal cause its a scientific one. Open your eyes! Global warming is caused by humans.
jeffkrofd 1 year ago
Global Warming is as made up as Karma, Mother Nature and Mother Earth.. Only idiots believe in this Garbage.. And I thought Christians are crazy.. LOL
Warriospwn 1 year ago
everybody who thinks global warming is just warming of the earth is idiots. global warming can also cause coolingthats what was happening in those 4 decades
KyleCourson100 1 year ago
hey genius, how about doing some research into what earth's average temp has been for most of it's history. The current temp average is below what's the planet's historic norm is.
have you ever studied paleontology, or biology?
I have, and from what I can see, you're the idiot.
blorgensteen 1 year ago 2
Who made this? Bush?
catroni21 1 year ago
what ever a politician saids, the opposite is true.
Zimba9810 1 year ago
What is especially interesting about Kleiner-Perkins, besides Gore & Republican Colin Powell's involvement, is Kleiner-Perkins/Goldman Sachs investment in the Oil drilling company Terralliance. That's helps to destroy the AGW red cabbages spouting of people's resistance to the AGW Racketeering Operation as "Oil Trolls".
You can also look into the Railroad Engineer who is running the criminal IPCC, Choo Choo Charlie Pachurai's extensive petroleum interests
AGW is a criminal enterprise
RICO now!
Thisawareness 1 year ago
this video is made by oil industry so don't pay attention to it
yoyaya007 1 year ago
More climate change in the news
States take sides in greenhouse gas 'endangerment' brawl.
States took their places in the trenches this week as they joined the court fight either for or against U.S. EPA's "endangerment" finding for greenhouse gases
GREENWIRE, March 20, 2010
Nightversionn 1 year ago
...CLIMATE news...
Australia has hottest-ever summer
AGENCE FRANCE-PRESSE
March 2, 2010
Severe weather in Australia, parts of which have been hit by a 10-year drought, has heightened public concern over climate change.
Western Australia has sweated through its hottest ever summer, recording average temperatures just shy of 30 degrees Celsius, officials said on Monday.
Nightversionn 1 year ago
if this is the best they come up with using bioethanol as feul than please drive v8 till every last drip is gone, and our oil addiction is finaly over. they wan't us to drive economic cars, but instead driving on water it must be oil based, you will see the more efficient our cars will drive the more expencive the oilprice. so please take hummer and end the shit
nwoprotest 1 year ago
Follow the money. Gore & his Goldman Sachs business partners (the enemy of the working/middleclass) have set up companies to "promote" their scam, funnel money to "influence" the results they want, then companies set up to "Cash in" on the criminal enterprise. All players involved in this criminal racket should be ensnared under RICO statutes. If enough of us had the gumption of our forefathers, these scumbags would be on ice by now
Thisawareness 1 year ago
i thought they had to delete this video... it was on the news for being wrong - even the company that made it said it was wrong
theSPUDereHD 1 year ago
China tells US to do more on climate change
By GILLIAN WONG
ASSOCIATED PRESS
March 10, 2010
China, the world's largest emitter of heat-trapping greenhouse gases, has said it will cut its "carbon intensity" - a measure of carbon dioxide emissions per unit of production - by 40 percent to 45 percent by 2020, compared with 2005 levels.
Nightversionn 2 years ago
funny how the news in europe says the states are the biggest emitter china 2nd.
here in holland situation is getting fucked up our deltaworks to protect us from the sea where calculated in 50'till 70's for a spring flood of 4 meters but now i have seen the rapports about sea level rising the maximum 10 years ago they said maximum 40 cm's in 100 years, now they say maximum 120 cm in 100 years.
level rising since the 70's is 30 cm till now. we are now living 2 meters below sea level
nwoprotest 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Climategate Cover Up: the next legal step
Civil and criminal cases against such climate fraudsters including key crooks Professor Phil Jones, chief climatologists at the UKs Climatic Research Unit (CRU), University of East Anglia, Professor Michael E. Mann of Penn. State University and that old eco-warrior, former U.S. vice president, Al Gore.
The civil litigation net will soon be cast far and wide in the U.S. skilfully applying the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO).
Thisawareness 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Terrific new NASA YouTube:
Our Earth has a FEVER! - the Climate Change puzzle
/watch?v=XzfRs74b-qw
For excellent data & scientific info. on Climate Change search:
1) Climate Change: Key indicators
2) Climate Change: NASA's Eyes on the Earth (These are the BEST sites)
3) NASA GISS Do Variations in the Solar Cycle Affect Our Climate System
4) Climate change odds much worse than thought MIT
-- and for some other great scientific YouTubes see the greenman3610
& potholer54 channels.
goog2k 2 years ago
Climate change causes more frequent and severe snowstorms. Record snowstorms need two things: temperatures below freezing, and very high humidity.
On a planet warmer by a few degrees on average, the Northeast US will still have plenty of days below freezing; the big difference will be warmer seas producing higher levels of moisture in the air — and therefore more severe cold-season storms.
Nightversionn 2 years ago
@Nightversionn you are an idiot! No really you are an idiot of immense proportions....kill yourself idiot! You can't have it both ways. When it doesn't snow you say global warming...when it snows it's global warming. How futile can your arguement get?
meanranger 2 years ago
Al Gore says the sea level will rise 20 feet in the next 10 years! Buy a boat and protect your kids from the RASIST NEO-Cons!!!!!
Denialists are nothing more than peer-rejected SLIME HOLES with primordial Science petitions!
The 30,000 who signed The Global Warming Petition Project are nothing more than cartoon characters carbon criminals and SCIENCE DENIALSIST propaganda.
Nightverssion 2 years ago
Gores Non-profit Agitators
Al Gore established his own global-warming group, the Alliance for Climate Protection The group favors more stringent environmental policy regulations on the private sector and especially wants cap-and-trade legislation so that companies will be forced to buy carbon credits
Gore is chairman of the board which also includes Clinton EPA Director Carol Browner President George H.W. Bushs National Security Advisor Brent Scowcroft & Reagan-era EPA Director Lee Thomas
Thisawareness 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
"The Himalayas are important not only for the people of Nepal but for 1.3 billion people who depend on waters from the mountains for their livelihoods," said Nepal's Prime Minister Madhav Kumar Nepal at the cabinet meeting broadcast live by state-owned Nepal Television.
The melting of the glaciers in the mountains due to global warming would bring about a scarcity of water in the river systems in South Asia, affecting more than a billion people in Nepal, India, Pakistan, Bangladesh and China..
Nightversionn 2 years ago
Al Gore was one of the architects of two of the most anti-American, anti-human rights, & anti-environmental legislation in the history of the United States. He was in office when NAFTA & GATT expansion to the WTO happened.
Multiple tens of millions of jobs that paid good wages were shipped to Al Gore's Marxist friends in China & the third world so that corporations who greased Gore's pockets could exploit the Environment & Human Rights & stuff their fat pockets with money
Thisawareness 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The following organizations agree that the evidence for anthropogenic global warming is overwhelming:
NASA, GISS, NOAA, NSIDC, US NAS, MIT, HARVARD, COLUMBIA, Royal Society, British Meteorological Office, etc.
Nightversionn 2 years ago
to back to sleep goog, oops you are "hibernating" already..... plastic from YOUR computer to blame goog not to mention you appear full of gore's hot air! Paul j. L'Heureux on fb am i ;} Pavel Shovelindasky on the peoplescube
Avril is my name, the world is just a game!
pjlu2 2 years ago
goog2k 2 years ago
JUST FOUND THIS YESTERDAY:
Hottest January in UAH satellite record
Human-caused global warming easily overwhelms much-hyped "cold snap"
February 5, 2010
"The global-average lower tropospheric temperature anomaly soared to +0.72 deg. C in January, 2010. This is the warmest January in the 32-year satellite-based data record."
To see the graph of the "UAH Globally Averaged Satellite-Based Temperature of the Lower Atmosphere, 1979-2010"
Search:
Hottest January in UAH satellite record
goog2k 2 years ago
@goog2k
Its odd. There is no upward trend from 1975 to mid 1990s as with ground global temperature graphs. Only a step upward around 2000 and then perhaps a flat trend since.
dartplayer170 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
U. S. Senate Minority Report:
More Than 700 International Scientists Dissent Over Man-Made Global Warming Claims
700 dissenting scientists from around the globe challenged man-made global warming claims made by the UN IPCC & Al Gore This new 2009 U.S. Senate Minority Report -- updated from 2007s-features the skeptical voices of over 700 prominent international scientists, including many current and former UN IPCC scientists, who have now turned against the UN IPCC AGW claims
Thisawareness 2 years ago
Oh, sorry Dmac, you're right! All the temperature figures are faked, and the WeatherChannel, NASA, NOAA, MIT, Univ.of California, Harvard, Cambridge, the American Geophysical Union, The Royal Society, Union of Concerned Scientists are all part of the conspiracy.
Except no one told the disappearing arctic ice, melting mountain glaciers, and the plants, animals, and insects all migrating north.
Duhh???
See the WeatherChannel YouTube:
Global Warming - Cool Summer WHY??
/watch?v=sX6jEsnGcrA
goog2k 2 years ago
In just FIVE YEARS between 2004-2009 thick perennial arctic sea ice DROPPED 42%. This was discovered by NASA satellite measurements. Reported 7/7/09
Search:
New NASA Satellite Survey Reveals Dramatic Arctic Sea Ice Thinning
Global Warming is changing our world NOW. CO2 is 35% above levels for 650,000 years. In just 30 years CO2 will be over 450ppm, enough to acidify oceans to the point of stopping the growth of many planktons and corals. They are at the base of the oceans' food chain.
goog2k 2 years ago
Bullshit, the only truth is that the alien robots from planet niburu are going to cause global warming which is why we need 96% of our income taxed....If we don't give the government all of our income the alien robots are going to enslave us all and rape you in the ass gay or not.....
Dmac11a666 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Hey everybody,
The CLIMATEDEPOT(dot)com website has some great new articles on all the scandals & malfeasance occuring daily at the IPCC & the GW scam
Open magazine has "The Climate Change Fraud" on its cover
The question now is, not that AGW is occuring, but how many people are going to be charged, & is this Al Gore's last flimflam scam?
Maybe Choo Choo Charlie & Al Gore can do the honorable thing & wrap their heads in Saran wrap & ring Marshal Applewhite for the UFO Taxi Service to Nibiru
Thisawareness 2 years ago
Science has prevailed on the issue of global warming, 3,000 of the best scientists in the world have issued 4 reports all unanimous that global warming is happening, and the last called the cause unequivocal.
There are still some people who will believe anything, and others who will argue for the oil companies (oil trolls), we do not take them seriously any more than we do people from the flat earth society.
The consensus on the science is as settled as it ever gets in science.
Nightversionn 2 years ago
The head quack of the IPCC has a mechanical & electrical engineering degree&worked for the railroad
His new nickname is Choo Choo Charlie
Now Choo Choo stands to make allot of money from links with carbon trading companies
google
"Rob Kremer: Head of IPCC - Blatant conflicts of interest"
Having Railroad conductors&foot doctors as climate experts is reminiscent of the pseudo sciences of the former Soviet Union
Thisawareness 2 years ago
What is at risk of being destroyed is not the planet itself, but the conditions that have made it hospitable for human beings.
People shouldn't be lying about this imho
Deniers need to get over their desperate obsession with Al Gore.
They will criticize Gore and make up lies about lawsuits, that tens of thousands of scientists are in on some huge hoax so that they can cash in
WHILE, GET THIS, the deniers HIDE their ties to big oil.
How sad is that
Nightversionn 2 years ago
Choo Choo Charlie's Big Oil ties
Dr. Rajendra K Pachauri Director of the Oil &
Natural Gas Company of India; Director of the Indian Oil Corporation Limited; Chairman of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate
Change, established by World Meteorological Organization and United Nations Environment Programme; Member of the Oil Industry
Restructuring Group, for the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas, Government of India; Member of the International Advisory Board of Toyota Motors.
Thisawareness 2 years ago
Wow, you just wont stop crying will you....
Dmac11a666 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
9 Out of the last 10 years were the HOTTEST on record.
2009 2nd HOTTEST year on record.
See: Graphs & Ranking (Top 10 Warmest Years)
Search: Data @ NASA GISS: GISS Surface Temperature Analysis: Graphs
See also the latest on YouTube:
It's Cold, so there is no Global Warming
/watch?v=sAvqabAPIr4&feature=sub
goog2k 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The Science of Global Warming is settled. The next time you hear this, reply "YAD061".
Google YAD061
Link Al Gore & Global Warming charade with the economic destruction of NAFTA, GATT, & WTO creation, which all happened under the Clinton/Gore presidency
Also remind people that the People's Democracy of China is sending its slave labor made junk back to us that have toxic chemicals in them that are making us & our children sick & dying!
Remind them of the environmental damage of Free Trade
Thisawareness 2 years ago
Comment removed
Nightversionn 2 years ago
Comment removed
Nightversionn 2 years ago
I hold Al Fraud Gore partly to blame for NAFTA & GATT/WTO which besides the vast horrendous economic & cultural devastation inflicted upon the working/middleclass, was a disaster environmentally. Relocating Industry from the West that had Environmental & Human Rights laws to countries that have little to none Who benefits? The corporations who backed Clinton/Goreflake and inundated them, their administration, & their friends in the Republican party with loads of money & gifts to get it passed
Thisawareness 2 years ago
Comment removed
Nightversionn 2 years ago
Global Warming is a pseudo-science like they had in the Soviet Union
The head of the Global warming Cult is a flake
The chief quack of the quacks at the IPCC is a railroad conductor
The head of the CUEI is an economist with ties to the IMF
The GW magical cure does not address the #1 factor for environmental degradation, wildlife declines, & GHG production
Yeah Global Warming is a pseudo-science
1984 Choo Choo!
THX 1138
Thisawareness 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The Christmas season got going with widespread snowfall that buried the nation's capital under almost 2 feet of snow. Dallas, which hasn't experienced a storm of blizzard proportions in 80 years, got socked with record snowfall. On Christmas Eve, half of the United States was covered with snow, according to an image that the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration released.
BaronVonLichtenstein 2 years ago
So all the CO2 emissions, the billions of cars, power plants, etc had NOTHING to do with an increase in temperature. If you say so....
nitro1439 2 years ago
I'll give Gore credit when the research is allowed to be scrutinized.
spreckt 2 years ago
You've all drunk the koolaid. This is from the movie "The Big Swindle" - revealed to be the biggest hoax and play on numbers ever broadcast on television - with THEE agenda of all - to be controversial, stir up doubt, and get an audience. All these beloved graphs are all bunk, if you have the guts to see the truth check out the "Climate Deniers Crock" postings on YouTube, specifically this one, dealing exactly with what you just watched here: v=boj9ccV9htk Debunked, but will YOU change? no
rightsideofhistory 2 years ago
Al whore is a faggot
titedus 2 years ago
A Gore has an agenda in search of data.
FUCK HIM!!!!!!!!
Wonderfuldaysable 2 years ago 3
Al Gore is a freak, greedy global warming pimp!
fornicatingtauruspoo 2 years ago 3
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Droughts and wildfires have turned more severe worldwide, from the U.S. West to Australia to the Sahel desert of North Africa.
Warming's impacts sped up, worsened since Kyoto
By SETH BORENSTEIN (AP)
Nightversionn 2 years ago
Simply not true-telling lies does not help your cause.
mauiluver 2 years ago 6
@Nightversionn they've turned more severe in the last several hundred years? or are we just better at seeing them? man made global warming is a lie. the planet is not in dire need of us doing anything. it warms and cools without our help.
rugger8541 1 year ago 3
@Nightversionn droughts and wild fires are more severe... compared to what? what data do you have of wild fires 300 years ago? 1000 years ago.
asleeperj 1 year ago
@Nightversionn Whilst it is easy to identify droughts and wildfires with global warming, not so intuitive is the relation to snow storms, floods and cyclones. The centre of Greenland is one of the coldest places on the planet yet not very much snow falls each year. That is because there is little water vapor left in the atmosphere by the time the air reaches the centre. With the warming oceans more water evaporates from the oceans resulting in more snowfall and flooding.
RasPesher 1 year ago
Hmmmm. Maybe its true but thats no reason not to remove the polllutants in the air by getting better cars and energy
TheNewOldVeteran 2 years ago
arm waving and pie-in-the-sky proposals won't work. Read Science and see how all of these things are backfiring and potentially making it worse. CO2 is not a pollutant-man only contribute 4.3% total of it to the atmosphere. The rest is all natural.
mauiluver 2 years ago 8
mauiluver: Wrong! Man-made CO2 is currently added annually 130 times more than all the breathing volcanos on earth combined, to the magnitude of an equivalent 8000 Mount Kilhuea's popping up and breathing. Plant life tries to tackle it every year, but can't take it all away, causing the net increase (can't catch up, like a filter system that's overburdened) and on it goes. All it takes is this tipping of a balance, and we have easily reached that now.
rightsideofhistory 2 years ago
@mauiluver yes that's a scientific argument - only <5% so can't cause problems...try drinking a glass of water with 0.0001% of copper in it...you'll be fine as copper in small doses is essential for you...then keep adding a bit more each day...see what happens to you after a few months...
salsalover69laters 1 year ago
@mauiluver good video. But to we really only contribue 4.3% to the co2 in the atmosphere? Ive heard that the ammount of co2 in the atmosphere has doubled the last 50 years. Wouldnt that mean we have contributed more than 4.3% or has the increase of co2 come from elsewhere? I still dont belive the co2 has much impact on the climate as whole
abvmoose87 10 months ago
@TheNewOldVeteran I do agree that we shouldn't be polluting the air, I don't believe global warming is real. But I'm also not talking about co2 as a pollutant. I think there are ways of doing things better and that those steps should be taken, but just for a cleaner more natural planet not because of global warming. So I agree with you on that, just probably not the same way.
Syn427 1 year ago
what was this programme called?
umbreli 2 years ago
AL WHORE
AnotherAlexChannel 2 years ago
lol
Fantastor 2 years ago
is there anywhere on the internet where i could get the graph at 4.04
charlienethercoat094 2 years ago
GOOGLE IT
SuperBored10 2 years ago
@SuperBored10 its ok now ive finished my homework anyway
charlienethercoat094 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
TWO Things to see:
One, SEE:
"Lord Christopher Monckton: From Global Warming to Global Governance"
Two, SEE:
"Professor Bob Carter"
Global Warming NEW truth - just out!
A MUST see . . .
weallknowitstrue 2 years ago
Check the real science Siddis33
The models used by IPCC are badly flawed and that's all they have left. They have quietly gotten rid of the hockey stick graph because it only used cherry picked data and left out most of the relevant data. Only Gore still touts it and he's making a fortune.
He's VP of a company that sells carbon credits, he's in on the electric car scam and charges 200,000 to speak. Altruistic huh.
His mansion power bill is shown to be larger than most small towns. SCAM
AirFire1000 2 years ago 7
i respect people's opinions, but factually that is both untrue and illogical.
I'm not sure what electric car scam you are referring to, but if you are confused electric cars are in fact real and useable.
Also check non--biased websites for your facts, because that is quite simply not...true. Sorry if i offended you.
XOmayalaughsXO 2 years ago
They certainly are. I was referring to the pile of cash Al got from the US Gov't that went into an electric car company in Europe.
Now guess who's a major shareholder in that little enterprise. Yup...Our pal Al. Same guy that buys his Carbon Credits from his own company but oh...doesn't actually buy them as they are provided as an employee perk. Als done quite well for himself with the whole AGW scam and he's busily rounding up every big buck investor he can.
AirFire1000 2 years ago
electric cars came about during the same time as gas engine vehicles. The advertising won over to the side of gas engines and electric cars were lost and swept under the rug. MONEY MONEY MONEY. Why don't people EVER understand. It's about the MONEY.
trevorfox 2 years ago
Not quite. Range was poor on Electric Vehicles back then and for the most part that problem is not solved. This is why Extended Range Electric Vehicles are the future. Think plug-in Hybrid but the generator can be anything. Solar cells, compressed natural gas, Hydrogen fuel cells, anything really which can produce electricity cleanly and efficiently.
Bryansix 2 years ago
Algore worked a deal giving "Fisker Motors" $500,000,000.00 in U.S. tax money to build electric cars that retail for $100,000.00 each.
The company says it will outsource all of the building of the cars to another company in Finland and Denmark. So your tax dollars are going out of the country to prop up companies that are going to support the Scandanavian economies.
I have to wonder how much of that 500 million is going to Gores personal accounts.
IMPLR1369007 2 years ago
i'm at 0:35. video is already bollocks. yes temp was already rising, but humans are having a rapidly increasing impact on the whole. see the sharp increase after 1900? effects of industrial revolution. as for the post war economic boom, lets face it, werent as many economically active polluting grown men in the world. also germany is no longer a world superpower at this point, + so less emissions. point is, if u look at that graph when it leads up to more recent years, human impact is obvious.
ShotgunBlues92 2 years ago 2
As a scientist I was taught that "Correlation is not Causation." Everyone agrees that 80% of green house gas is water vapor. Man contributes about 5% of the carbon dioxide by weight into the atmosphere every year. 20% of the remaining green house gas after water vapor is CO2, then man contributes less than 1% of the global warming gases (0.20 x 0.05). If man put zero CO2 into the atmosphere, that would lower the CO2 in the air by only four thousandth of one percent. Bill
mauiluver 2 years ago 4
Ok mauliver, seems you know what you're talking about here, but I'm kinda lost. How did you reach four thousandth of one percent with those calculations? At the moment I am looking to write up a dissertation on whether mankind is affecting climate change significantly, or whether global warming is a natural process of which we have very little control over or effect upon. I have to compare and contrast 3 articles of different views, and really I need all the background knowledge I can get.
ShotgunBlues92 2 years ago
@mauiluver I am a scientist in progress yet, but i can think of this.. what makes us believe 5% is not a great impact? our limited brains tend do rationalize quantities by our standards of what is a lot or too little but, does nature comands itself by these same standards? Of course not. Maybe a 0.03%could make the difference. I'm into the anti-reductionism cientific flow. Natural laws are not always based on math models, i think. I would give Gore a little credit.
capchio 2 years ago
@mauiluver gee your smart - you must be a mathematician. 5% of natural level every year huhhh? That would only take 20 years to reach what is already there then....why do people who can't do math think they can beat all the published scientists in argument...go back to speical school you moron
salsalover69laters 1 year ago
How egotistical of you to think that we, the human kind can actually change nature..
Can you tell me how the temperature increased before there were any hummers or humans? Was it perhaps the methane released by Dinosaurs?? Meanwhile, we'll all start riding around in bicycles and using candles and wood to cook- no more electricity..
You go first. Get rid of your car and all the electricity in your home and we'll follow.
aldridkg 2 years ago
aldridkg, i hardly think i'm being egotystical. Of course i don't think that we humans alone are responsible for global warming, that would be absurd. At the time of my first comment on this video, I did strongly believe that mankind had made a real impact on the already occurring natural process of global warming. However, as I've looked further into the subject, I'm not so sure of whether human impact is in fact significant. And as for your last statement - Would you follow? Really?
ShotgunBlues92 2 years ago
Well, it looks like you have actually considered rationality vs. blind emotionalism on this matter. While there is not one person out there that would disagree with our need to conserve, recycle, etc. we disagree at the expense of regressing in our living standards. For example, we have no problem using alternative fuels if there were any & dat were affordable. Forcing people to go from cars to bicycles by taxing them to death is not going to work, simply because it's unfair & repressive.
aldridkg 2 years ago
agreed and agreed.
ShotgunBlues92 2 years ago 2