If you look up "coalition" in the dictionary, it actually means a schedule of regular blow-jobs from a weak man in a yellow tie to a thatcherite Tory-boy.
I don't particularly like this one. I understand it's just an edit, rather than a proper song, but it's too repetitive and the tune doesn't fit that well.
Nick Cleggand the restof the politicians in the house of commons only listens to their rulers in bryssels & the major Bankclerks in London! If you want somewhat of a change then Vote for UKIP or the BNP in the 2014 election.
@SuperZiggy12 why BNP there worse than Cameron and Clegg combined they will never win because the only argument they have going for them is they will sort out immigration and in a really shit idea I think UKIP is also a bad idea as you may be able to tell by my name I believe in a unified Europe (my opinion)
all in all your just another racist fuck who needs to open his eyes
@USE4life Well to begin i'm neither a narrow-minded racist or for that matter a Xenophobe, Gay hating or a bullying prick. I'm an individual who believe in individualism (a.k.a Capitalism), but i do believe in the nation state that creates a national unity among the people weather you're blue,green,black or white. I do support BNP & UKIP with a tougher immigration policies as the immigration has been far too high and have changed the demographic in the UK as British families has decreased.
Economic stability is all very good, but if the war ravages the country in other ways, what use will a steady economy be? and to be honest the UK has become a bit too like the US when it comes to war for my liking.
Dan, I like the videos you make, but I'd really like if you could bring back the good old habit of yours and write the lyrics in the description of the vids.
I know that your recent videos are mostly for British folk, but as a follower of the news, I can also see what's it all about, my only problem is (and I'm pretty sure I'm not the only one here) that there are parts in the lyrics I can't really understand.
I don't know why people rae giving him such a hard time. He didn't think in a MILLION years that his party would get into power and lets face it in the coalition the conservatives have most of the power.
@legodarknight101 Because he signed a pledge even though he was planning to break it at the time? Because he's changed his entire economic policy just to get into power? Because he's propping up a reactionary Tory government so he can have a job in govt, administering Tory policies? Because he and his party came third, but still think they have the right to be in power? These are just a few of the reasons.
That wasn't at all clear from your last one, this time you have stuck with the main issue and not being side-lined by what the press, Cameron and the police want you to see. I have seen plenty of footage of police brutality from yesterday, violence works both ways, the police have the experience to provoke, orchestrate and manage it, to discredit the protest and it's aims.
Either the police are incompetent or it is no coincidence Charles and Camilla got involved. Anyway, good work : )
@douglby I still think violent dicks are violent dicks....WELL WHEN 2 MILLION CAN MARCH AGAINST AN ILLEGAL WAR AND NOTHING HAPPENS...people atart to realise that peacefull protests is about as much use as an ashtray on a motorbike...im pretty sure that if the French peacefully protested against Louis XVI nothing would of happened and they would still be in the same situation...MAXIMUM VIOLENCE IMMEIDIATLEY
Clegg,has no power he is just a yes man to Cameron nothing more, and i would never vote for Clegg or his party ever again.
He is just a puppet and when Cameron pulls his string he just bends over and sings the Tories tune,and when he is in num10 he walks around on tiptoes never says or asks about what he has to sign or say he is just told to do it,what a life running around like a right lost little boy,is Clegg on the zbed when he gets to do a sleepover?
clegg is a moron with no identity and no personality. who elected this moron in? you lot. that is why i blame all the scumbags that voted liberals. nick cleg is a small prick
I am really ashamed of all these British governments and devil police that punch at the little girls faces and heads over and over again, this is absolutely disgusting, these mother fuckers send their posh kids to the most expensive, private and best schools, but they do not care about the rest, they do not listen to us, they break their promises and pledges that they made before the election, shame on you scumbags, you are all lost the credibility around the globe.
Why not form a NEW PARTY with X as the LEADER. X pronounces in its(politically correct) him, her or other. I, WE or IT in OUR manifesto will give to EVERY man woman and child the sum of £500 every week. Rest assured that upon my election by your grateful vote I X will immediately break my word. So THERE YOU are SUCKERS. I, X am convinced that even after you mugs have found me out you will still grin and bear it and vote for me again. Am I wrong..
I like how many people think going to university is about drinking and delaying the inevitability of getting a job, the very reason we go to university is to better our future. Less people in full-time higher education means more people unemployed seeking jobs that will barely suffice to pay for food. Education is one of the most important rights of a human being, these rises in tuition fees are being proposed by people who went to university in a time when it was free. Hypocritical much???
@emaxwell458 thats the thing, when it comes to the next election you will vote for 1 of the big ones,lib dems,labour or the conartists and we will be in the same situation again.Because of the system the smaller parties will never get power because of this :( I dnt want any of the big 3 in power but i know they will be...:(
Lol everyones kicking off, but I must say people in Scotland don't have to pay a penny so why should we? We can all agree and say that nick clegg is a wanker and money is all he's after, if it keeps going like it is. British people won't be buying cars or buying anything, it's getting to expensive because of all the money the government is lending other countries and we have to pay it back!
I'm not here to start a argument please don't click respond to this I cba with the chew some of you wil
Going to University isn't a right, its a privilege. Why devalue it by allowing everyone to go. We should thankful that it's still a hell of a lot cheaper than just about anywhere else/
There are more important things to spend money on rather than blow it all so everyone can avoid the realities of life for another 3-4 years and go out drinking every night
I watched them in parliment today b4 they decided for us to chargd us...thieving bastards!!!! Most ppl in there were fat and ugly. When they were talking about 40 of them got up and left, and within the hour the room was nearly empty. GOOSES FOR KING!!!
And yep there scum, lying through their back teeth,sadly the protest today and all the others did nothing,they will have decided it all before they even got in to power. They dont care, if they did they would tax the rich and super rich and stop over taxing the working class.
@britishgoose01 wtf dude im a grown man, your comment doesnt upset me. SO answer the fucking question you dip shit, what has being fat and ugly got to do with setting policy?
@britishgoose01 Thieving bastards? They haven't stolen anything? They have just prioritised other things over taking the hit for everyone's uni bills, Uni is still heavily subsidised
yea so basicall someone like me who is technically under the law
in "child poverty"
is now getting handed a bill for £45,000
just because someone came out of a richer pussy doesnt give them anymore right.
all we want is to go and learn.
how is it that people who try get high end jobs which benefit society get charged yet people who don't work at all get paid to do nothing but watch jeremy kyle.
@Konartwist a bill for £45,000? don't make me laugh you goon.
I don't give a shit, bottom line, your logic could be applied to anything....I want that car but i cant have it because I was born into a less fortunate family.
It's not your right to go to Uni its something you earn, either get a job, take a bigger loan out or go for a scholarship, if the money isn't there then it isn't there end of. Why should I go to war with not kit so you can go on the fucking raz day and night at oxford?
@14th20thKRHkickass People going to uni and getting good degrees is the foundation of the economy and the world. Pretty much everything you see or own has had more than one university graduate doing something to contribute to its making. I agree with you in that some people go to uni just because and get a shit degree in peace studies or enviromental science, they are just a joke. But I want to study engineering and contribute and im gonna be crippled with debt for most of my life, nice one nick
@Konartwist goon? Fuck you, do you realise that most people in the Army come from poverty stricken background? No education and the only people that'll take them in is the Army.
you think you're talking to a private here? I'm an officer you dick, most of the men in my troop come from among the poorest families of the South West, and you sit here and bitch because you're going to have to shed a bit more money.
Yes cuts will happen as long as nothing else arises, which it's already beginning to
@Konartwist Do you even realise that most people don't benefit from University? the jobs they end up getting are ones that could have been gotten with out 3-4 years of tax payers money being spent.
most people who go to Uni get a 2:2...it means jack shit. A 2:1 means a little something, the only thing people actually give a shit about anymore are masters and first class degrees, why should we all pay for the rest of you to coast for 3 years. Advice? join the Army now and stop hiding from life
@Konartwist Oh and might I suggest that when you do your briefing and mainboard, perhaps not to let them know that you think spending money on people that coast through university is more important than investing in the military....you won't get very far, if by some divine act of god they still see fit to send you on, you'll definitely get a shitty deal, maybe you'll opt for Cav or Army Air Corps? They'll all reject you and then you'll get given Logistics (who WILL be cut very soon)
@14th20thKRHkickass You think spending money on the military is an "investment"? You don't get anything back from doing that. Spending money on education, however, is the best investment you can make because it yeilds huge economic benefits.
@hugoegbert79 Well actually investing in the military lessens the effect of global terrorism on our nation. You see your problem is you look at the military in black and white, well guess what smartarse, it's grey.
Education yields economic benefit, a UNIVERSITY education on the other hand does not in most cases. The market it saturated with people with degrees but bled dry of job placements for those people. a 2:2 is no longer worth anything on the street, a 2:1 itself isn't worth alot either
@hugoegbert79 So really what I've done there is dispelled your fantasy, that everyone can go and get a top notch job and live happily ever after, in theory it's great, the reality however conforms with the basic supply and demand laws. There is a huge supply of people with degrees, there isn't a huge demand for them.
There is however a need for economic well being to fight wars overseas as opposed to on home turf. I'd look further than the tabloids if I were you. You'll see that it's not good
@hugoegbert79 Investing in the military offsets risks that can be run by an enemy attacking a home nation, also it protects the nation's greater interests overseas.
To withdraw it's expenditure would open us up to attack (most likely Argentina with the falklands saga, though Iran, Korea and Burma also pose nuclear threats, hence we need trident) and the effect of that would be the UK losing huge amounts of money and investment, then we'd be back to rising tuition fees and upping tax rates.
@14th20thKRHkickass Yeah, invading Iraq prevented a terrorist attack on the streets of London, you're right. Oh no, wait, it actually provoked a terrorist attack on the streets of London. We weren't a target beforehand. So there's your argument destroyed.
@hugoegbert79 Iraq wasn't the war on terrorism, Afghanistan was. We weren't the target before hand? Well I think you'll find that the West was the target all along, 9/11 occurred before any attack on the Middle East. So actually my argument isn't destroyed you moron.
You look at this in black and white, there is no clear victory or loss. It is all perspective. Not all attacks can be stopped, however by crippling their organisation overseas, it will itself reduce the threat on home turf.
@14th20thKRHkickass Although it may seem to you that the world started on september 11th, wars and indeed the rest of the world were already there. september 11th was not random. Wars in the middle east are not random. I think you should read up a bit more before you go calling other people morons.
@nitotom 9/11 was the outcome of a terrorist attack, aimed at the fact that the US had an Airbase in Saudi Arabia. Terrorism didn't start at 9/11, but it was kicked up a gear and focuses more strongly on us and our way of life.
He is a moron because he disregards military expenditure, not a wise move, every time we do that it continues until we get fucked and then we end up playing catchup and suffering more than we need to. If you can't see that you ought to be looking at preschool not uni
@TheZajac123 4th largest military? we're somewhere in the 20s you moron.
An example if our Armed forces was even smaller? well we'd be saying goodbye to the Falklands, goodbye to world status and the revenue we draw from that, and somewhere down the line we'd be saying hello to terrorism and goodbye to democracy and then you'd ALL be saying goodbye to University and even the the basic rights that make your life here in the West so comfortable.
@14th20thKRHkickass We spend more than any country on Defence apart from the USA, China and France. Look up the (SIPRI) Yearbook 2010. Democracy seems to be holding pretty strong in countries like Finland and New Zealand even though they spend a fraction of what we do on military spending, what makes the UK so different?
@TheZajac123 Our political position is what. We are currently defending a huge stake in the worlds largest oil reserve, we are at war with Muslim fundamentalists, we have a more important economy that if knocked out would have much more serious effects of the rest of the world and we are major world players at a political level.
The other 2 are not and have not. Peace and democracy may be doing ok now but that's because wars have been fought and battles won. Don't be ignorant
@14th20thKRHkickass How is it that we are at war with Muslim Fundamentalists and the rest of Europe isn't? And how does deploying our troops in Iraq and Afganistan make us safer? In economic terms the two wars have been disasterious for the UK, it would have made a lot more sense not to invade along with the USA like the rest of Europe did.
@14th20thKRHkickass If you wish to go by the number of total active troops then the UK is pretty far down the list, but the point is not about the number of troops but rather the amount spent on the military. We spend more than Russia yet have only 1/10 as many active troops as them, so there is no arguement to be made that we need to sepnd as much as we do or more to maintain current troop numbers.
@TheZajac123 Listen here, do not talk to me about what is and what is not important in warfare, I am in the Army, the name is more than a give away. We spend alot on our forces, but consider where the money goes.....salaries. See, I bet you didn't even consider the fact that Russian soldiers get paid next to nothing and that ours get paid very well.
Also I wouldn't trust the figures Russia is putting out for the world to see, it is like them to underplay something to give them an upperhand
@14th20thKRHkickass Germany has 75'000 more active troops than the UK and spends $13 billion a year less on their military. In other words a developed, European country with more active soldiers than the UK spends less on it's military than the UK. All figures from the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute. Could you provide some figures and statisics for your asserations please.
@TheZajac123 Yes I know the figures thankyou, however, as I've already said, they cannot afford to deploy them, their training programmes are cheaper due to a lesser quality and their equipment is also cheaper a) because their industry is bigger and more competitive and b) because they don't deploy it and therefore don't need to spend millions on up armouring everything.
@TheZajac123 They have democracy and freedom now because their interests are currently being battled out in the middle east by the Americans and British with minimal help from other EU nations. That's how.
Don't base your ideology on what the current climate is now, firstly because it is more secure due to military operations attacking the source of out enemies and secondly because; what is today, may not be tomorrow. Half of the thing with defence is you need to be preprepared for anything
@TheZajac123 I think the state should use it's army, the very organisation that I myself am a part of, to hit at it's enemies with pre emptive strikes than sitting about like you are now, kidding yourself that it'll all blow over by itself. Key to politics is to use diplomacy but carry a bigger stick than the opponent. Dickheads like you are cutting our stick down further and further and that's why we're going to be left without fighters for our new aircraft carriers. We are in danger
@14th20thKRHkickass A simple "Yes, I am in favour of wars of aggression" would have sufficed. it also would have been refreshingly free of Ad hominem abuse.
@14th20thKRHkickass Are you seriously of the opinion that if America and Britain were not fighting in the middle-east than German democracy would be under greater threat?
@TheZajac123 It's not just Germany, I was using the nation in your example. And yes, the democracy and saftey of the people in the Western world would be hugely under greater threat if we weren't slugging it out in the middle east. Get your head out of the sand, Iran is threatening a nuclear haulocaust on Israel, Pakistan, a nuclear power, is under threat of falling into the hands of the taliban and even burma is going nuclear not to mention North Korea. The world is in danger you twat
@14th20thKRHkickass I'll take that as a "yes, I am of the opinion that if America and Britain were not fighting in the middle-east than German democracy would be under greater threat and the world would end in a nuclear holocaust."
@TheZajac123 I'm getting bored of talking this out with you, because your mind is closed. A nice fact for you? If and when America reaches the end of it's tether with our military cut backs and it leaves Europe to it's own devices, you'll see that governments throughout Europe will start taking the state of their own militaries more seriously. When things start kicking off in Asia, we're going to be in the shit because we've put our foot in the bucket and gone overboard with the welfare state
@14th20thKRHkickass A simple ,"yes, I am of the opinion that if America and Britain were not fighting in the middle-east than German democracy would be under greater threat." would have sufficed.
@TheZajac123 Look again you you comment with such a stupidly narrow focus. Economics don't change over night, you are like everyone looking for clear signs of victory. The fact that a war might stop huge economic losses in the future, that it might save a nation from future destruction, has never crossed your mind has it? No didn't think so. So why I want to part with tax money so we can turn out a load of know it all dickheads like you? You'll not find a decent job anyway so why bother? waste.
@14th20thKRHkickass So you are of the opinion that the wars we have been fighting for the last decade or so will turn out to be of long-term economic advantage to the UK and the US? I'm just trying to pin down your views soi I can understand them and how you came to such a position.
@TheZajac123 Its not about making economic gain, it's about preventing future economic loss through various means.
Are you trying to understand me? really? Or are you trying to find something to try and rubbish it all? I think it's the latter, however if you actually spend time looking into the middle east and the expenditure and political imbalance, you will see that the threat is very real and the slightest cockup on our behalf back at home can plunge the world into chaos
@14th20thKRHkickass If I were to sum up your opinion of the war it would be: "it necessary for the economy and for world peace, and anyone is says differently is wrong, [ad hominem attack]". Am I correct in my summation?
@TheZajac123 And you want some figures and what not? well look at unit cost for the Challenger 2 and the Leopard 2. In real terms the Challenger 2 unit cost is a staggering £5.2 million and nearing £6 million for the telic 10 spec, the Germans newest version of the leopard 2, the A6 comes in at under £4 million because it sold for export, something we couldn't do.
And it's like that with most of our kit, even the foreign made kit is being upgraded to levels other nations cannot afford. ££££££
@14th20thKRHkickass Until you show how democracy and national security in the UK would be negatively effected by reducing military spending/withdrawing from Iraq then all of this is irrelevant. You are starting with the assumption that these wars are cost-effective whilst there is no evidence for this view.
@TheZajac123 We're not in Iraq cluster fuck. So you're obviously not in the know at all. Argue all you like about numbers of other nations in the West, their kit is cheap and their training mediocre. Can they afford to deploy all their people? no. Why should I waste time scouting figures for you, I'm sure if you look hard enough at what you've got and at menial things such as unit costs, training programme length and cost as well as salaries you'll see what I see and you'll learn whilst doing it
@TheZajac123 look at more than a fucking table of money in and money out, looking at your page I see you're interested in economics. So why don't you use the Uni education you're fighting to keep cheap and break all the numbers down into inputs and outputs and tie them to cash flow, cash injection and effects had. Also consider the behavioural economics, you know the stuff that fuels politics on all levels? Have a look at who's money is going where and you see that they are secured by us and USA
@TheZajac123 Numbers count for everything, if you have an armed forces that is extremely small like we do, then deployments are more difficult. Half of our problem in Afghanistan is that we could do with about 3 times as many British troops there so we can hold ground that we regularly take. The Americans are now there and helping but prioritise their own goals. We don't have enough men out there because we need 5 out of rotation for every man rotated into Op theatre, my argument remains strong
@14th20thKRHkickass Your arguement is unsound as other developed countries can field more active troops than the UK despite having lower military spending. You have to show that we couldn't cut our military spending without reducing troop numbers despite the fact that other developed countries have less funding and more troops.
@TheZajac123 Other nations such as Germany have conscripts mixed in with volunteers giving them more personnel, some nations cut back on money expenditure for equipment and training. My argument is a reality, your's is mere speculation and looking at everything in black and white, I've told you this.
Oh and other developed nations with larger forces can't actually deploy more men than we can, you look at figures, figures can be deceptive, you've been deceived.
@14th20thKRHkickass Please back up your assertations with some figures as they are currently baseless. Germany may use conscripts but Italy doesn't, Italy has more active troops and Italy spends less. Your arguements seem to rest on the basis that the wars in Iraq and Afganistan are essential for national security, a view not shared by the majority or backed by any figures.
@hugoegbert79 Besides, as I pointed out, defence isn't just for now and the current climate, political climates shift with a scary pace, one incident can render all that went before irrelevant.
When you take a close look at what is going on in other countries, you can see that alot of LEDCs and IDCs are re arming in an attempt to shift the world order. We cannot risk that, it could mean the UK getting a shitty deal, therefore we need to keep a strong armed forces. Think with an open mind on it.
I heard that that if we stopped are nuclear arms program or something like that there would be no need for these cuts and the balance of payments deficit would be restored, so if our governments took their heads out of Americas asses and maybe we though for are selves we would be a lot better off and these middle east countries wouldn't hate on us as much!
@K1TOMK1 Stopping our nuclear arms program would be a massive mistake. For starters we would lose our seat on the UN security panel, and yes that is a big deal. FACT.
As much as I dislike Cleggo, he's not the one in charge. It wasn't that he lied, it's that when in a dual government, you have to make concessions.
On a happier note, I like the song.
DrEthanAsia1 6 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Everybody that disliked this video...
1. Look at the dislike bar.
2. Look at your penis.
3. No difference huh?
mrasiancat2 1 week ago
Lib-dem reject hes a fucking tory all the way hes only there to lick david camerons balls
MrDazzman180 1 month ago 2
Nick Clegg is a tory, he began as a tory mp, so he obviously never even believed in liberal democrats views to began with. Prick.
cookieeeeemonsterr 1 month ago
If you look up "coalition" in the dictionary, it actually means a schedule of regular blow-jobs from a weak man in a yellow tie to a thatcherite Tory-boy.
LoneRookRS1 2 months ago 6
I don't particularly like this one. I understand it's just an edit, rather than a proper song, but it's too repetitive and the tune doesn't fit that well.
someguywhocanfly 2 months ago
To be fair, he's not really in power... David Cameron makes the decisions...
CKJMA 3 months ago
@CKJMA and clegg stands idley by waiting to munch on davy's rim
mikeymana 2 months ago
i don't think young people should be don't think young people either
DrEthanAsia1 3 months ago
Carlsberg don't do wankers...But if they did.
stevenB943 3 months ago 5
I remember you off your nick clegg rap vid
nice
Will you be doing more when the time comes around again ?
Konartwist 3 months ago in playlist More videos from douglby
Shithead
galatura 5 months ago
Shithead
galatura 5 months ago
Fucking love it how he griefed another politician for "political opportunism" rofl. Irony.
Eiraha 9 months ago
He has a very bland face . . .
simonelli2 9 months ago
People seem to be forgetting that it was a Conservative policy to raise tuition fees.
7031 9 months ago
@7031 Couldn't the Fib Dems have refused to work with the conservative, if they were so against their policies?
Like how Tony Blair was bezzie mates with Gaddafi and now we are trying to murder the man
WorldsTrollestTroll 5 months ago
@7031 u seem to forget its a coalition government with clegg firmly pressing his head up camerons arse
mikeymana 2 months ago
Nick Clegg is spineless ponce,
just like all Liberal Democrats,
lottiesocks 9 months ago
a prick with ears!
yulaw3 11 months ago
this is soo good!! top effort
chrisfox1990 11 months ago
this guy is just a bastard, i hope he reads this.
advers1078 11 months ago
Good song, check out my Nick Clegg song, vocals are a bit Lee Marvin, but it'll make you chuckle.
vongeyer 11 months ago
NEVER TRUST AN ORANGE!
farliesbirthday 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Search for 'March For The Alternative' online and facebook. Lets tell them how much we don't agree with them on the 26th.
08unigirl 11 months ago
Maddy Carty Condemm age-search
peppersauceman78 11 months ago
This is so catchy- I want it on my ipod!
Renfeildette 1 year ago
This is brilliant
Domthjoker 1 year ago
Why did nick clegg cross the road ? because he said he wouldnt
maxngregproductions 1 year ago 110
@maxngregproductions No, otherwise how is he going to suck David Cameron's dick on the other side of the road?
sob12121 2 months ago
@maxngregproductions I told my own version of that joke with Enda Kenny instead...half of them didn't get it. Oh, the woes of teenagedom.
2TJW 1 week ago
Nick Cleggand the restof the politicians in the house of commons only listens to their rulers in bryssels & the major Bankclerks in London! If you want somewhat of a change then Vote for UKIP or the BNP in the 2014 election.
SuperZiggy12 1 year ago
@SuperZiggy12 why BNP there worse than Cameron and Clegg combined they will never win because the only argument they have going for them is they will sort out immigration and in a really shit idea I think UKIP is also a bad idea as you may be able to tell by my name I believe in a unified Europe (my opinion)
all in all your just another racist fuck who needs to open his eyes
USE4life 1 year ago
@USE4life Well to begin i'm neither a narrow-minded racist or for that matter a Xenophobe, Gay hating or a bullying prick. I'm an individual who believe in individualism (a.k.a Capitalism), but i do believe in the nation state that creates a national unity among the people weather you're blue,green,black or white. I do support BNP & UKIP with a tougher immigration policies as the immigration has been far too high and have changed the demographic in the UK as British families has decreased.
SuperZiggy12 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@SuperZiggy12
'i'm neither a narrow-minded racist or for that matter a Xenophobe, Gay hating or a bullying prick...I do support BNP & UKIP'
LMAO!!!!!!
evie666 1 year ago
Comment removed
MrPhartiphukborlz 1 year ago
this is the 4th result when you search in nick clegg on youtube :D
0MrAnon2 1 year ago
Funny but true
OldFatBaldman 1 year ago
29 people tried to stop falling fire extinguishers with their heads
RobertREX3 1 year ago
What's the difference between Nick Clegg and Santa Claus ?
It's okay to believe in Santa
hannahhazlehurst 1 year ago 133
Economic stability is all very good, but if the war ravages the country in other ways, what use will a steady economy be? and to be honest the UK has become a bit too like the US when it comes to war for my liking.
zenetharc 1 year ago
this shuold be on itunes
chiken787 1 year ago
I said before the election he was a prick and tuition fees were bound to go up and people laughed it off. Hahaha
AverageJoe117 1 year ago
lol this is fukin hilarious!! :D .... although i still want to punch him so hard in the face that cameron shits the boudoir!
Alex4124124 1 year ago
If I saw Clegg...
TomPatCat 1 year ago
its fair... its right... its fair... its right...
mrblushy 1 year ago
..all in all he's just another dick with no balls
jongee 1 year ago
the dimming down of the people starts here lol
macs19772002 1 year ago
Lmao!!!
adilD11 1 year ago
Well done Dan, that's more like it!
Tasbo1982 1 year ago
@rockguitar2012 I have been feeling the same.
Great video! Hilarious lol
ChapperzTV 1 year ago
This is great! Thanks for uploading!
The man is a hideous rodent; but you managed to turn him in to a Mickey Mouse!
sylviaphryne 1 year ago
good stuff
fronswa 1 year ago
Dekent
Ronangamevideos 1 year ago
Nice one.
hummingbird821 1 year ago
Yesterday I was awake at 3am with the flu and a headache, having strange hallucinations, and this song was stuck in my head xD
rockguitar2012 1 year ago
Dan, I like the videos you make, but I'd really like if you could bring back the good old habit of yours and write the lyrics in the description of the vids.
I know that your recent videos are mostly for British folk, but as a follower of the news, I can also see what's it all about, my only problem is (and I'm pretty sure I'm not the only one here) that there are parts in the lyrics I can't really understand.
Thank you and respect from Hungary.
dzsamalful 1 year ago
twat
TheGreenante 1 year ago
just . . . perfect
1thedividedsoul1 1 year ago
...even more apt today...heh
tabithatwitchetty 1 year ago
I don't know why people rae giving him such a hard time. He didn't think in a MILLION years that his party would get into power and lets face it in the coalition the conservatives have most of the power.
legodarknight101 1 year ago
@legodarknight101 Because he signed a pledge even though he was planning to break it at the time? Because he's changed his entire economic policy just to get into power? Because he's propping up a reactionary Tory government so he can have a job in govt, administering Tory policies? Because he and his party came third, but still think they have the right to be in power? These are just a few of the reasons.
hugoegbert79 1 year ago
Clegg blows Cameron.
ArshavinatorTheTres 1 year ago
Belter tune pink Floyd ruined by that shit
TheScOuSeRcArL 1 year ago
stupid english sucked in so easily .............scotland said no
tommy444able 1 year ago
Why did Nick Clegg cross the road?
Because he said he wouldn't.
andywatson932 1 year ago 2
We'l "We want to see you and the rest of you Bastards gone"
Iraq = Tony Blair
nekzt generation full of debt = Nick clegg & his Pimp Cameron!!!!
Tro0par 1 year ago
Totally on the money Dan Bull, I take my hat off to you!
Like many of my friends I'm feeling pretty shafted by the Lib Dems at the moment!
jemcope1985 1 year ago
Well done, - have a look at what we say: Google widgeripoo
Widgeripoo 1 year ago
Much better than your last effort, glad you appear to be on the right side this time : )
onwebcameron 1 year ago 3
@onwebcameron Thanks although I haven't changed sides, I still think Clegg misled voters and I still think violent dicks are violent dicks
douglby 1 year ago 21
@douglby
That wasn't at all clear from your last one, this time you have stuck with the main issue and not being side-lined by what the press, Cameron and the police want you to see. I have seen plenty of footage of police brutality from yesterday, violence works both ways, the police have the experience to provoke, orchestrate and manage it, to discredit the protest and it's aims.
Either the police are incompetent or it is no coincidence Charles and Camilla got involved. Anyway, good work : )
onwebcameron 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@douglby I still think violent dicks are violent dicks....WELL WHEN 2 MILLION CAN MARCH AGAINST AN ILLEGAL WAR AND NOTHING HAPPENS...people atart to realise that peacefull protests is about as much use as an ashtray on a motorbike...im pretty sure that if the French peacefully protested against Louis XVI nothing would of happened and they would still be in the same situation...MAXIMUM VIOLENCE IMMEIDIATLEY
ousamadidndoit 1 year ago
haha good one man havent laughed so much in time, except for when i saw camilla's shock at the tuition fee vote
slamdunked1 1 year ago 2
this is sosos good!
nutty257 1 year ago
FUCK CLEGG
SandSlashX 1 year ago
Clegg,has no power he is just a yes man to Cameron nothing more, and i would never vote for Clegg or his party ever again.
He is just a puppet and when Cameron pulls his string he just bends over and sings the Tories tune,and when he is in num10 he walks around on tiptoes never says or asks about what he has to sign or say he is just told to do it,what a life running around like a right lost little boy,is Clegg on the zbed when he gets to do a sleepover?
jayjay19822007 1 year ago 2
What are the chances this is getting on HIGNFY then?
Docipede 1 year ago 17
it's the banks the politicians are the puppets..
Vdjperks 1 year ago
Ah how I lold
1337isdead 1 year ago
clegg is a moron with no identity and no personality. who elected this moron in? you lot. that is why i blame all the scumbags that voted liberals. nick cleg is a small prick
scarredcobra 1 year ago
Well done cleggy you have fucked this country right .
Why don't you celebrate and share some loving time with your brother fucker's of a party.
imbusydoctorwho 1 year ago
Betrayed. Sold out.
mikerawk88 1 year ago
I am really ashamed of all these British governments and devil police that punch at the little girls faces and heads over and over again, this is absolutely disgusting, these mother fuckers send their posh kids to the most expensive, private and best schools, but they do not care about the rest, they do not listen to us, they break their promises and pledges that they made before the election, shame on you scumbags, you are all lost the credibility around the globe.
1234567loading 1 year ago
Why not form a NEW PARTY with X as the LEADER. X pronounces in its(politically correct) him, her or other. I, WE or IT in OUR manifesto will give to EVERY man woman and child the sum of £500 every week. Rest assured that upon my election by your grateful vote I X will immediately break my word. So THERE YOU are SUCKERS. I, X am convinced that even after you mugs have found me out you will still grin and bear it and vote for me again. Am I wrong..
justphil101 1 year ago
dicked
t6yz 1 year ago
Hang on... it's Nick Clegg saying "Click here for more Dan Bull videos" ...he's probably lying or something...
Wilbosteele 1 year ago
cleg u r big idiot i really feel sorry y i gav u the vote
Juggahh 1 year ago
I like how many people think going to university is about drinking and delaying the inevitability of getting a job, the very reason we go to university is to better our future. Less people in full-time higher education means more people unemployed seeking jobs that will barely suffice to pay for food. Education is one of the most important rights of a human being, these rises in tuition fees are being proposed by people who went to university in a time when it was free. Hypocritical much???
SuperJack7point7 1 year ago
To all the people who were stupid enough to believe Clegg in the TV debate - welcome to political reality.
TheReluctantUTuber 1 year ago
i was just playing this song and i was seriously confused
TGram29 1 year ago
I hope all you youngsters have learned:
ALL IN WESTMINSTER ARE CROOKS. They don't give a shit about you. Labour, Tory, Lib Dem - all a bunch of sharks
BattleMagic 1 year ago
i hope the lib dems pay for this in the next election
emaxwell458 1 year ago
@emaxwell458 thats the thing, when it comes to the next election you will vote for 1 of the big ones,lib dems,labour or the conartists and we will be in the same situation again.Because of the system the smaller parties will never get power because of this :( I dnt want any of the big 3 in power but i know they will be...:(
britishgoose01 1 year ago
Lol everyones kicking off, but I must say people in Scotland don't have to pay a penny so why should we? We can all agree and say that nick clegg is a wanker and money is all he's after, if it keeps going like it is. British people won't be buying cars or buying anything, it's getting to expensive because of all the money the government is lending other countries and we have to pay it back!
I'm not here to start a argument please don't click respond to this I cba with the chew some of you wil
UNCLESEANYC 1 year ago
@UNCLESEANYC
to be honest im looking forward to immigrating now
thank you nick clegg =)
*joking obviously*
but seriously bye England
-i always did like the accent over in the valleys
-im fom north, i can deal with a bit of rain in scotland
-so glad i can speak french
-oh hai there canada
-or even back to the home land of the rep . (of ireland)
Konartwist 1 year ago
Going to University isn't a right, its a privilege. Why devalue it by allowing everyone to go. We should thankful that it's still a hell of a lot cheaper than just about anywhere else/
There are more important things to spend money on rather than blow it all so everyone can avoid the realities of life for another 3-4 years and go out drinking every night
14th20thKRHkickass 1 year ago
hilarious, i think that comedy can be a good way of getting political issues talked about.
ec123456789able 1 year ago
we should make this the christmas number one, can anyone out there make it happen, or is simon cowell a tory
geoffthetaxi 1 year ago
I need to Russell up £80,000 for uni... Hmmm...
ThatKidKnows 1 year ago
Nice work Dan, love it man!!!!!
rich836 1 year ago
somebody should autotune this
pmattu 1 year ago
What a faggot.
Laurismxo 1 year ago
This guy is worse than cameron, backstabber!
EkLarkiThi 1 year ago 9
@EkLarkiThi only hitler is worse than cameron
SeanI84 1 year ago
I watched them in parliment today b4 they decided for us to chargd us...thieving bastards!!!! Most ppl in there were fat and ugly. When they were talking about 40 of them got up and left, and within the hour the room was nearly empty. GOOSES FOR KING!!!
britishgoose01 1 year ago
@britishgoose01 what the fuck has being ugly and fat got to do with policy. youre a dick head for talking such bs.
68000cpu 1 year ago
@68000cpu get a personality u sad twat
And yep there scum, lying through their back teeth,sadly the protest today and all the others did nothing,they will have decided it all before they even got in to power. They dont care, if they did they would tax the rich and super rich and stop over taxing the working class.
britishgoose01 1 year ago
@britishgoose01 wtf dude im a grown man, your comment doesnt upset me. SO answer the fucking question you dip shit, what has being fat and ugly got to do with setting policy?
68000cpu 1 year ago
@68000cpu i never mentioned the policy I just said why are most of the mps fat and ugly
britishgoose01 1 year ago
@britishgoose01 Thieving bastards? They haven't stolen anything? They have just prioritised other things over taking the hit for everyone's uni bills, Uni is still heavily subsidised
14th20thKRHkickass 1 year ago
@14th20thKRHkickass
yea so basicall someone like me who is technically under the law
in "child poverty"
is now getting handed a bill for £45,000
just because someone came out of a richer pussy doesnt give them anymore right.
all we want is to go and learn.
how is it that people who try get high end jobs which benefit society get charged yet people who don't work at all get paid to do nothing but watch jeremy kyle.
irrelevant Wales here i come
Konartwist 1 year ago
@Konartwist a bill for £45,000? don't make me laugh you goon.
I don't give a shit, bottom line, your logic could be applied to anything....I want that car but i cant have it because I was born into a less fortunate family.
It's not your right to go to Uni its something you earn, either get a job, take a bigger loan out or go for a scholarship, if the money isn't there then it isn't there end of. Why should I go to war with not kit so you can go on the fucking raz day and night at oxford?
14th20thKRHkickass 1 year ago
@14th20thKRHkickass People going to uni and getting good degrees is the foundation of the economy and the world. Pretty much everything you see or own has had more than one university graduate doing something to contribute to its making. I agree with you in that some people go to uni just because and get a shit degree in peace studies or enviromental science, they are just a joke. But I want to study engineering and contribute and im gonna be crippled with debt for most of my life, nice one nick
morron6666 1 year ago
@14th20thKRHkickass
its your choice to go to fucking war you goon
thats why.
and i dont sympathize with you either because you've been using this military excuse too much
hell i'm going off to war so I honestly couldn't care
the education is for after the service so i have a backup in case of even more cuts to the military
(which there will be)
Konartwist 1 year ago 2
@Konartwist goon? Fuck you, do you realise that most people in the Army come from poverty stricken background? No education and the only people that'll take them in is the Army.
you think you're talking to a private here? I'm an officer you dick, most of the men in my troop come from among the poorest families of the South West, and you sit here and bitch because you're going to have to shed a bit more money.
Yes cuts will happen as long as nothing else arises, which it's already beginning to
14th20thKRHkickass 1 year ago
@Konartwist Do you even realise that most people don't benefit from University? the jobs they end up getting are ones that could have been gotten with out 3-4 years of tax payers money being spent.
most people who go to Uni get a 2:2...it means jack shit. A 2:1 means a little something, the only thing people actually give a shit about anymore are masters and first class degrees, why should we all pay for the rest of you to coast for 3 years. Advice? join the Army now and stop hiding from life
14th20thKRHkickass 1 year ago
@Konartwist Oh and might I suggest that when you do your briefing and mainboard, perhaps not to let them know that you think spending money on people that coast through university is more important than investing in the military....you won't get very far, if by some divine act of god they still see fit to send you on, you'll definitely get a shitty deal, maybe you'll opt for Cav or Army Air Corps? They'll all reject you and then you'll get given Logistics (who WILL be cut very soon)
14th20thKRHkickass 1 year ago
@14th20thKRHkickass You think spending money on the military is an "investment"? You don't get anything back from doing that. Spending money on education, however, is the best investment you can make because it yeilds huge economic benefits.
hugoegbert79 1 year ago
@hugoegbert79 Well actually investing in the military lessens the effect of global terrorism on our nation. You see your problem is you look at the military in black and white, well guess what smartarse, it's grey.
Education yields economic benefit, a UNIVERSITY education on the other hand does not in most cases. The market it saturated with people with degrees but bled dry of job placements for those people. a 2:2 is no longer worth anything on the street, a 2:1 itself isn't worth alot either
14th20thKRHkickass 1 year ago
@hugoegbert79 So really what I've done there is dispelled your fantasy, that everyone can go and get a top notch job and live happily ever after, in theory it's great, the reality however conforms with the basic supply and demand laws. There is a huge supply of people with degrees, there isn't a huge demand for them.
There is however a need for economic well being to fight wars overseas as opposed to on home turf. I'd look further than the tabloids if I were you. You'll see that it's not good
14th20thKRHkickass 1 year ago
@hugoegbert79 Investing in the military offsets risks that can be run by an enemy attacking a home nation, also it protects the nation's greater interests overseas.
To withdraw it's expenditure would open us up to attack (most likely Argentina with the falklands saga, though Iran, Korea and Burma also pose nuclear threats, hence we need trident) and the effect of that would be the UK losing huge amounts of money and investment, then we'd be back to rising tuition fees and upping tax rates.
14th20thKRHkickass 1 year ago
@14th20thKRHkickass Yeah, invading Iraq prevented a terrorist attack on the streets of London, you're right. Oh no, wait, it actually provoked a terrorist attack on the streets of London. We weren't a target beforehand. So there's your argument destroyed.
hugoegbert79 1 year ago
@hugoegbert79 Iraq wasn't the war on terrorism, Afghanistan was. We weren't the target before hand? Well I think you'll find that the West was the target all along, 9/11 occurred before any attack on the Middle East. So actually my argument isn't destroyed you moron.
You look at this in black and white, there is no clear victory or loss. It is all perspective. Not all attacks can be stopped, however by crippling their organisation overseas, it will itself reduce the threat on home turf.
14th20thKRHkickass 1 year ago
@14th20thKRHkickass Although it may seem to you that the world started on september 11th, wars and indeed the rest of the world were already there. september 11th was not random. Wars in the middle east are not random. I think you should read up a bit more before you go calling other people morons.
nitotom 1 year ago
@nitotom 9/11 was the outcome of a terrorist attack, aimed at the fact that the US had an Airbase in Saudi Arabia. Terrorism didn't start at 9/11, but it was kicked up a gear and focuses more strongly on us and our way of life.
He is a moron because he disregards military expenditure, not a wise move, every time we do that it continues until we get fucked and then we end up playing catchup and suffering more than we need to. If you can't see that you ought to be looking at preschool not uni
14th20thKRHkickass 1 year ago
@14th20thKRHkickass We already have the fourth largest military in the world, give us an example of what might happen if we only had the tenth.
TheZajac123 1 year ago
@TheZajac123 4th largest military? we're somewhere in the 20s you moron.
An example if our Armed forces was even smaller? well we'd be saying goodbye to the Falklands, goodbye to world status and the revenue we draw from that, and somewhere down the line we'd be saying hello to terrorism and goodbye to democracy and then you'd ALL be saying goodbye to University and even the the basic rights that make your life here in the West so comfortable.
14th20thKRHkickass 1 year ago
@14th20thKRHkickass We spend more than any country on Defence apart from the USA, China and France. Look up the (SIPRI) Yearbook 2010. Democracy seems to be holding pretty strong in countries like Finland and New Zealand even though they spend a fraction of what we do on military spending, what makes the UK so different?
TheZajac123 1 year ago
@TheZajac123 Our political position is what. We are currently defending a huge stake in the worlds largest oil reserve, we are at war with Muslim fundamentalists, we have a more important economy that if knocked out would have much more serious effects of the rest of the world and we are major world players at a political level.
The other 2 are not and have not. Peace and democracy may be doing ok now but that's because wars have been fought and battles won. Don't be ignorant
14th20thKRHkickass 1 year ago
@14th20thKRHkickass How is it that we are at war with Muslim Fundamentalists and the rest of Europe isn't? And how does deploying our troops in Iraq and Afganistan make us safer? In economic terms the two wars have been disasterious for the UK, it would have made a lot more sense not to invade along with the USA like the rest of Europe did.
TheZajac123 1 year ago
@14th20thKRHkickass If you wish to go by the number of total active troops then the UK is pretty far down the list, but the point is not about the number of troops but rather the amount spent on the military. We spend more than Russia yet have only 1/10 as many active troops as them, so there is no arguement to be made that we need to sepnd as much as we do or more to maintain current troop numbers.
TheZajac123 1 year ago
@TheZajac123 Listen here, do not talk to me about what is and what is not important in warfare, I am in the Army, the name is more than a give away. We spend alot on our forces, but consider where the money goes.....salaries. See, I bet you didn't even consider the fact that Russian soldiers get paid next to nothing and that ours get paid very well.
Also I wouldn't trust the figures Russia is putting out for the world to see, it is like them to underplay something to give them an upperhand
14th20thKRHkickass 1 year ago
@14th20thKRHkickass Germany has 75'000 more active troops than the UK and spends $13 billion a year less on their military. In other words a developed, European country with more active soldiers than the UK spends less on it's military than the UK. All figures from the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute. Could you provide some figures and statisics for your asserations please.
TheZajac123 1 year ago
@TheZajac123 Yes I know the figures thankyou, however, as I've already said, they cannot afford to deploy them, their training programmes are cheaper due to a lesser quality and their equipment is also cheaper a) because their industry is bigger and more competitive and b) because they don't deploy it and therefore don't need to spend millions on up armouring everything.
14th20thKRHkickass 1 year ago
@14th20thKRHkickass And yet they still have democracy and national security! How is that?
TheZajac123 1 year ago
@TheZajac123 They have democracy and freedom now because their interests are currently being battled out in the middle east by the Americans and British with minimal help from other EU nations. That's how.
Don't base your ideology on what the current climate is now, firstly because it is more secure due to military operations attacking the source of out enemies and secondly because; what is today, may not be tomorrow. Half of the thing with defence is you need to be preprepared for anything
14th20thKRHkickass 1 year ago
@14th20thKRHkickass Should the state use it's army to defend it's economic interests around the world through invasion and occupation?
TheZajac123 1 year ago
@TheZajac123 I think the state should use it's army, the very organisation that I myself am a part of, to hit at it's enemies with pre emptive strikes than sitting about like you are now, kidding yourself that it'll all blow over by itself. Key to politics is to use diplomacy but carry a bigger stick than the opponent. Dickheads like you are cutting our stick down further and further and that's why we're going to be left without fighters for our new aircraft carriers. We are in danger
14th20thKRHkickass 1 year ago
@14th20thKRHkickass A simple "Yes, I am in favour of wars of aggression" would have sufficed. it also would have been refreshingly free of Ad hominem abuse.
TheZajac123 1 year ago
Comment removed
Silvertrine 1 year ago
@14th20thKRHkickass Are you seriously of the opinion that if America and Britain were not fighting in the middle-east than German democracy would be under greater threat?
TheZajac123 1 year ago
@TheZajac123 It's not just Germany, I was using the nation in your example. And yes, the democracy and saftey of the people in the Western world would be hugely under greater threat if we weren't slugging it out in the middle east. Get your head out of the sand, Iran is threatening a nuclear haulocaust on Israel, Pakistan, a nuclear power, is under threat of falling into the hands of the taliban and even burma is going nuclear not to mention North Korea. The world is in danger you twat
14th20thKRHkickass 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@14th20thKRHkickass I'll take that as a "yes, I am of the opinion that if America and Britain were not fighting in the middle-east than German democracy would be under greater threat and the world would end in a nuclear holocaust."
TheZajac123 1 year ago
@TheZajac123 I'm getting bored of talking this out with you, because your mind is closed. A nice fact for you? If and when America reaches the end of it's tether with our military cut backs and it leaves Europe to it's own devices, you'll see that governments throughout Europe will start taking the state of their own militaries more seriously. When things start kicking off in Asia, we're going to be in the shit because we've put our foot in the bucket and gone overboard with the welfare state
14th20thKRHkickass 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@14th20thKRHkickass A simple ,"yes, I am of the opinion that if America and Britain were not fighting in the middle-east than German democracy would be under greater threat." would have sufficed.
TheZajac123 1 year ago
@TheZajac123 Look again you you comment with such a stupidly narrow focus. Economics don't change over night, you are like everyone looking for clear signs of victory. The fact that a war might stop huge economic losses in the future, that it might save a nation from future destruction, has never crossed your mind has it? No didn't think so. So why I want to part with tax money so we can turn out a load of know it all dickheads like you? You'll not find a decent job anyway so why bother? waste.
14th20thKRHkickass 1 year ago
@14th20thKRHkickass So you are of the opinion that the wars we have been fighting for the last decade or so will turn out to be of long-term economic advantage to the UK and the US? I'm just trying to pin down your views soi I can understand them and how you came to such a position.
TheZajac123 1 year ago
Comment removed
TheZajac123 1 year ago
@TheZajac123 Its not about making economic gain, it's about preventing future economic loss through various means.
Are you trying to understand me? really? Or are you trying to find something to try and rubbish it all? I think it's the latter, however if you actually spend time looking into the middle east and the expenditure and political imbalance, you will see that the threat is very real and the slightest cockup on our behalf back at home can plunge the world into chaos
14th20thKRHkickass 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@14th20thKRHkickass If I were to sum up your opinion of the war it would be: "it necessary for the economy and for world peace, and anyone is says differently is wrong, [ad hominem attack]". Am I correct in my summation?
TheZajac123 1 year ago
@TheZajac123 And you want some figures and what not? well look at unit cost for the Challenger 2 and the Leopard 2. In real terms the Challenger 2 unit cost is a staggering £5.2 million and nearing £6 million for the telic 10 spec, the Germans newest version of the leopard 2, the A6 comes in at under £4 million because it sold for export, something we couldn't do.
And it's like that with most of our kit, even the foreign made kit is being upgraded to levels other nations cannot afford. ££££££
14th20thKRHkickass 1 year ago
@14th20thKRHkickass Until you show how democracy and national security in the UK would be negatively effected by reducing military spending/withdrawing from Iraq then all of this is irrelevant. You are starting with the assumption that these wars are cost-effective whilst there is no evidence for this view.
TheZajac123 1 year ago
@TheZajac123 We're not in Iraq cluster fuck. So you're obviously not in the know at all. Argue all you like about numbers of other nations in the West, their kit is cheap and their training mediocre. Can they afford to deploy all their people? no. Why should I waste time scouting figures for you, I'm sure if you look hard enough at what you've got and at menial things such as unit costs, training programme length and cost as well as salaries you'll see what I see and you'll learn whilst doing it
14th20thKRHkickass 1 year ago
@TheZajac123 look at more than a fucking table of money in and money out, looking at your page I see you're interested in economics. So why don't you use the Uni education you're fighting to keep cheap and break all the numbers down into inputs and outputs and tie them to cash flow, cash injection and effects had. Also consider the behavioural economics, you know the stuff that fuels politics on all levels? Have a look at who's money is going where and you see that they are secured by us and USA
14th20thKRHkickass 1 year ago
Comment removed
TheZajac123 1 year ago
@TheZajac123 Numbers count for everything, if you have an armed forces that is extremely small like we do, then deployments are more difficult. Half of our problem in Afghanistan is that we could do with about 3 times as many British troops there so we can hold ground that we regularly take. The Americans are now there and helping but prioritise their own goals. We don't have enough men out there because we need 5 out of rotation for every man rotated into Op theatre, my argument remains strong
14th20thKRHkickass 1 year ago
Comment removed
TheZajac123 1 year ago
@14th20thKRHkickass Your arguement is unsound as other developed countries can field more active troops than the UK despite having lower military spending. You have to show that we couldn't cut our military spending without reducing troop numbers despite the fact that other developed countries have less funding and more troops.
TheZajac123 1 year ago
@TheZajac123 Other nations such as Germany have conscripts mixed in with volunteers giving them more personnel, some nations cut back on money expenditure for equipment and training. My argument is a reality, your's is mere speculation and looking at everything in black and white, I've told you this.
Oh and other developed nations with larger forces can't actually deploy more men than we can, you look at figures, figures can be deceptive, you've been deceived.
14th20thKRHkickass 1 year ago
@14th20thKRHkickass Please back up your assertations with some figures as they are currently baseless. Germany may use conscripts but Italy doesn't, Italy has more active troops and Italy spends less. Your arguements seem to rest on the basis that the wars in Iraq and Afganistan are essential for national security, a view not shared by the majority or backed by any figures.
TheZajac123 1 year ago
@hugoegbert79 Besides, as I pointed out, defence isn't just for now and the current climate, political climates shift with a scary pace, one incident can render all that went before irrelevant.
When you take a close look at what is going on in other countries, you can see that alot of LEDCs and IDCs are re arming in an attempt to shift the world order. We cannot risk that, it could mean the UK getting a shitty deal, therefore we need to keep a strong armed forces. Think with an open mind on it.
14th20thKRHkickass 1 year ago
You should know better than to believe them bigdogscocks in "Parliarment"
summut2do 1 year ago
lier
jenssdewalka 1 year ago
lol nice video
Holsinator 1 year ago
I heard that that if we stopped are nuclear arms program or something like that there would be no need for these cuts and the balance of payments deficit would be restored, so if our governments took their heads out of Americas asses and maybe we though for are selves we would be a lot better off and these middle east countries wouldn't hate on us as much!
K1TOMK1 1 year ago
@K1TOMK1 Stopping our nuclear arms program would be a massive mistake. For starters we would lose our seat on the UN security panel, and yes that is a big deal. FACT.
AnonymousDukie 1 year ago