Added: 2 years ago
From: NeoConZionistThreat
Views: 3,559
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (11)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • haha PO, more like PC. typical diversion of issues.typical method of trying to make people critical of israel and the neocon philosophy out ot be a nut. typical antisemite accusations. how about talking the issues instead of just using tired old tactics by the war-loving pro israel crowd. people can see through that shit now if ya didn't know. AMERICA FIRST!

  • Well said, pleasegetrealtoday

  • Hey, I finally got James Bamfords, "A Pretex for War" on James' recommendation, so far it seems like an excellent book!

  • Comment removed

  • Actually it was the first thing out of his mouth on the other video he upped today. My suggestion on how he should approach calling CSPAN comes from making observations of all videos I've seen of him calling the Journal. Again, rubes online conflate criticism of movies/books/things and making those respective objects. One need not be a movie producer to act as a proper critic of movies. Did Ebert ever produce a movie?

  • Really, PO, your high-mindedness isn't called for here. He comes off perfectly clear in his call, one doesn't need a doctorate in public speaking to make a phone call into C-Span. The reason he mentions the Israel lobby in EVERY call is because he is filling a void in the American media. The more people who look at sites like Neoconzionist threat, the better, again, the media blackout.

    Your post isn't very constructive, no offense. The whole thing feels like pseudo-intellectual banter.

  • lame

  • That was pretty lame the way that so called "expert" had never heard of Freeman, huh?

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more