Added: 10 months ago
From: AVweb
Views: 42,461
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (44)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Of course it's good for society you idiot... Been in a traffic jam lately?

  • When you build a flying craft, wouldn't you equip it with a parachute? You'd think that because an inventor started something themselves, that they don't see the natural needed things surrounding it. You'll be surprise what worlds we are in. However an Airplane is something else. Sometimes I wonder how the heck is an Earth so Vast become built and dominated with buildings and roads in such a fashion. What are we??

  • @heartlessvietboy The jetpack now includes a parachute in case of emergency.

  • If flying crafts are to overtake the skies, we want to make sure it's as safe as possible.  The question is whether it's good for society. Police pursuits, crimes, falling crafts, etc.

  • Awesome Jetpack! First in the world to create a jetpack that will fly more than 30 seconds! And he's Kiwi. What more can you say!

  • That Figures, only a dummy will fly that Lawnmower up High until the Carburetor Stalls in Mid-Air Just like what happened the Coyote.

  • The Flying House is more appropriate

  • You would have to have huge balls of steel to actually fly one.

  • The Flying car is impossible. This Video does not mean anything. 

  • @heartlessvietboy Right now the flying car seems impossible, you don't know the future there buddy. Many years ago we thought cell phones were impossible...look at us now.

  • /watch?v=1ehCzNcPTMc

  • Isn't it technically a 'Rotorpack'?

  • These people know that if the drive fails in any way the device falls to the ground unimpeded with catastrophic consequences. it is this fundamental problem that has sunk every other jetpack invented and will sink this one. It all on wikapedia.

  • @98avro98 Sure, because Wikipedia is the best source for credible, verified and factual information.

  • @HotRodKush You don't really have to bother answering, if you look at other videos from the company, it quickly becomes obvious that this guy is trolling professionally... and I'd be willing to bet quite a sum who voted with a dislike on this vid.

  • @Arc91 46 likes 1 dislike. Yours most probably. Why would want to dis someone that is trying to be innovative?

  • @98avro98 Not sure I agree, it is fitted with a ballistic parachute. similar device, ie. the ejector seat have saved many lives.

  • @Rapido3d Well first off it is not fitted with a ballistic chute, they say one will be developed. A ballistic chute and an ejector seat are not similar devices. All a ballistic chute does is withdraw the chute to its maximum extension and rest is normal parachute operation. The best off them needs about 300 feet to open and brake the fall. A 0 0 ejector seat (Martin Baker) rockets the sitting pilot up deploying the chute while going up often greatly assisted by speed. Cost @ 250.000 pounds UK.

  • very cool!!!

    

  • that would be alsome if you able to fly around, press a button, shootig a gun off the jetpack

  • Yeah, I will strap a 747 turbine on my back and call it a jetpack sure. That thing is FHUGE!!! hahahahahahahaha. I thought the concept of a jetpack was to be able to let the user move on the ground without the help of 2 or 3 guys??? Whats the point of this? I rather fly a mini helicopter.

  • @lostchildren - baby steps, mate. The thing's still being developed, and they don't want to kill too many test pilots during the learning curve period.

    It practically IS a mini-helicopter, in ducted form.

    Still, I feel this is going to be another Moller Skycar.

  • @JBofBrisbane Yeah I wondered if it would go that route but I have spoken to Glenn a few times and watched their progress for a few years now and I think they are on the right track, I think they will succeed and the price will come down, they have good range and I can see them being used by the the rescue and medical services, film companies, land surveyors etc etc. I think it is the most credible and affordable vtol to date.

  • Insted of shooting fish in a barrel we will now call it shooting guys in jet packs out of the sky.

  • Pretty cool!!

  • Great to see but I think it needs two motors - otherwise it would have to always be above the minimum safe parachute deployment height. And these things can't auto-rotate!

  • If English is not your primary language then I am glad to help. If you assimilate something, you absorb it into you.

    For example: Young migrants are quick to assimilate into their new country's culture, but older migrants take longer to assimilate.

    People are not being absorbed, nor do most of us assume that something called a "jet pack" by the manufacturer would be anything but a jet powered pack.

    In your native language, how would you describe the manufacturers LYING about their product?

  • @CHNOPSXXY And just to be clear, assimilate can be used to describe being absorbed into something, or you absorbing something into you or your personality.

  • I could buy a few cubs for that price! 

  • That pack is just tooo big

  • I like this style of news :) Keep it up!

  • So how long do you think it will take to get that contraption certified?

  • Why call it a jet pack? Seems disingenuous from the start. Makes one wonder what else the company is lying about.

  • @CHNOPSXXY It's called Jetpack because of popular use of that word. Everyone assimilates a machine that goes on your back and makes you fly as a Jetpack, so I believe the company just went with it.

  • @pedroca2424 the word you were looking for was, "assumes."

    I guess by your logic, we should call all airplanes, "Jets."

    I do not know the motivation behind the company lying about their product, but to willfully mislead, as they have done, should certainly be a RED FLAG of warning for customers who should wonder, "When will they tell the truth and when will they embellish?"

    I wouldn't fly something from a company who I didn't trust, and I don't trust these guys, already.

  • @CHNOPSXXY sorry, english is not my primary language, but I think assimilate worked fine for my purpose. "To make similar; cause to resemble"

    I don't get why you say the company is lying to you. Everyone knows thats not a jet. I don't think anyone would want a jet on the back. They just went for a popular name that instantly everyone assemblies to, instead of a overcomplex name that no one will know what its about. And on an early phase like this, the most attention you get, the best!

  • @CHNOPSXXY folks aint that dumb it uses ducted fans ,fans put out a column of air,a column of air is sometimes called a jet of air.anybody considering one of these things is gonna be smart enough to know what it is.pilots aint dumb

  • All the reading I did in the 60s told me that everybody was supposed to have a jetpack by the year 2000.

    I'm still mad it didn't happen.

  • @CheckDare alsow ere all meant to have androids by 2005 :(

  • wonder how heavy mannequin..

  • @skorpen2 probably a regular crash test dummy... If I'm not mistaken its about 170lb, or 77kg

  • Human Lawn Dart

  • OK so I want one! Thats looks like it will be one awesome machine when it's done but I don't know how many practical applications there can be for it.

  • @N556ND Well I'd definitely fly to work

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more