This is a hillarious ad... if someone likes conway over paul, im not sure they are sane. How could someone vote for an establishment career politician? Have you not learned anything the last 10 years? Wake up... maybe you have no idea what is going on as you walk around in your sheepish daze. We need new people.... not the same ol status quo!
this some bullshit...how can anyone talk about Obama and on fuck ass Bush is the reason the US is the way it is. why no one talked about fuck face Bush this way...i like Obama cause he do not get into this bullshit.
Jack Conway has been dishing it out to Rand Paul since day number 1, but he sure as heck can't take it can he? What a crybaby! Good job Rand, I had a really good laugh. I would definitely vote for you if I lived in your state!
@darkhawk123 I get a kick of unintelligent people like you who would rather have an establishment, career politician (used car salesman) in office rather than a principaled, honest man.
@odinsragess I just think the state Republicans should have found a better candidate is all. This guy isn't all he should be. How am I am supposed to get excited about Ron Paul 2.1? He is going to run for president one day, and on that day I am going to be underwhelmed.
@wahahn I can't wait to post here on November 2rd when Paul, Paladino, Christie, O'Donnell, & all other Tea Party folks go down in flames. Your "the elections a fixed" cries will not help you sleep at night. They are terrible candidates running on an insane Populist policy of repeal everything from Social Security, to shutting down the Post Office, to shutting congress down. You folks HAVE no platform to run on. Just screaming "No". THAT'S why you'll loose
@wahahn yes you will. That's the beauty of our process, your wild predictions trying to echo 1994 have consequences. You might not like the reality. Be well!
@dynomyght functioning agencies existing since 1775, & 1935 will end? Your party has been screaming this after they were enacted, & now as they still work today. Nothing's perfect, & we can always strive for better, but I wish I could grant all your Tea Party uber right Libertarian views in place to watch you stand there screaming "What, I have to spend $6.47-$7.94 per letter to mail my Netflix back because I can only use UPS/Fed Ex/DHL?". Franklin would be a socialist to you nuts
@dynomyght "posted"? You mean "mailed" or "sent"? Their rates are MUCH higher, they are premium services with a higher price. It's not debatable, it's economic fact. Now their are always exceptions like if you use Fed Ex to send a letter, but the Post Office to send a chair. The chair is higher because of size & weight. But compare the PO with Fed Ex for the same service. PO is almost always cheaper
@Garmichael1 you'd scream the world flat because you could. Your google is broken like your brain. Type in: Post Office vs Fed Ex Prices. You will get this from consumer reports. For the same size package next day air USPS is $36.85. For the same service from Fed Ex $73.50, & UPS $73.50. 2 Day Air USPS is $16.80, while for Fed Ex & UPS it's $43.65 each. Postal Service doesn’t add a fuel surcharge, & discounts for those using on-line shipping. You don't know what you're talking about
Media maggots hate Rand Paul because he obeys the spirtit of the US Constitution. Until these maggots in the Media are removed America will continue its spiral down the toilet.
@darkhawk123 Jews have usurped our Media. Our entire Media is controlled by a wicked Jewish minority. In America we currently live under a Jewish Apartheid. To answer your question more directly I do not recommend abridging the freedom of press but the Media is the most powerful aparatus in the entire World. The power of suggestion. I'm open to all ideas but the bottom line is we need a "free" press. Not a wicked Marxist Jewish press.
@darkhawk123 Unfortunately most tea party people are ignorant to this fact like you and even moreso they are most likely to be zionist. Nothing wrong w/ the Tea Party. I agree with about 90% of what they say as opposed to about 60% of republcian and maybe 20% democrat.
@ks7800 Are you serious? You guys are a joke and you still think that by simply saying someone is a racists or that they want to starve old people or throw the kids our of school that anyone with half a brain believes you? Really?
Your day has come and thank God, gone. America will not be fooled by the likes of you and Jack Conway and they sure don't believe your lies anymore.
He wants people 55 and under to eventually pay. Having an adult conversation and not demagoguing the issue, most reasonable ppl would agree that medicare will be broke in a few years. Career Politician needs to admit that he supports 95% of the Obama Agenda, which is why he beat out the moderate Mongiardo. He was for cap/trade (w/ exceptions) before he was against, was for war in iraq before he was against it, and was for letting majority of bush tax cuts expire.
@stoneecold23 No reasonable person would agree that Medicare is going to be broke in a few years. The latest projections show that the hospital fund will be insolvent in 2017 - however, it's worth noting that those same projections always show a near-term insolvency. From 1970 to 1999, the projected insolvency date was always before 2010 - yet it's not insolvent now. In 1970, the projected insolvency date was 1972. This is a question of taking in what we pay out, not radically changing Medicare.
It is radically changing the system to tell future generations that in 20-30 years they may have to pay a higher deductible? What's reckless is letting career politicians like Jack-O scare senior citizens into voting for him, implying to them that Rand wants to slap them with a high deductible. The baby boomer population contradicts what you are saying. There will simply be far too large a population that is retired in the next decade, and we will need a higher deductible.
Pretty sure it was 200000. And I'm just saying, your political worldview seems to clearly coincide with the democrats'. Your comments about them are nothing more than partisan bile, they're meaningless.
the best part about this ad is that it made conway furious. He came on a radio show and threatened to sue Paul and said that his attornies are looking at this commercial for false advertising.
He is going to sue Paul for linking him to Obama/Pelosi!!!
@stoneecold23 no, this is way better than his campaign. The tone isn't mean-spirited but the message is clear. Obama never had a commercial that was as good as this one.
jack conway deleted my comment on americas inmate population and incarceration rates on the ad where he said your to soft on crime The United States has the highest documented incarceration rate in the world The U.S. incarceration rate on December 31, 2008 was 754 inmates per 100,000 U.S. residents, or 0.75%.[3] The USA also has the highest total documented prison and jail population in the world i think thats a address that needs to be issued when he says that again and he signs death warrants
I hate mud slinging. Too bad Rand doesn't follow in his fathers footsteps. Win or Lose....It doesn't matter if we lose our morality along the way. We can't act like the issue is as black and whaite as saying 'big govt' 'debt', etc....
Lets really talk about the issues. RON PAUL 2012!!!!
This is the first ad out of 4 adds where he attacks his opponent. On the other hand, look at how many adds Conway is putting on Rand attacking him....
@fras1788 YOU NEED CAPITAL TO CREATE JOBS. THE ONLY WAY YOU GET CAPITAL IS THROUGH SAVINGS. WHO SAVES? HMMMMMMMMMMMMMM THE RICH. YOU, SIR, ARE THE MORON!
@Bain1998 Lol, most of the people I know involved in the Tea Party including myself are not religious. There is an overlapping between the Religious Right and the Tea Party, however, they are the nutcases. If they take up social issues as their main platform, they will fail. If not, they will succeed. Only time will tell.
haha... your scenario is wrong - free market will stop everyone from trying to start a fishing company (supply and demand, you know, that thing that happens on its own without control of the govt.)
Here's another one:
Conservative - educate everyone and let them govern themselves
Socialist - sit down and shut up idiot, I am the elite, and I will do a better job of taking care of you than you yourself, I'll take everything you own and do what's best for the "greater good" / (rulling class)
@383mazda That makes no sense - I don't even know if you read the post. The free market will not stop them from devastating the fisheries - that's precisely why they're in catastrophic decline. Fish sticks used to be cod, then they were haddock, then pollock as each was fished out from the North Atlantic fishery. Cod was listed as endangered by the WWF. Companies, particularly in today's fast-paced financial environment, are not structured so that they can refuse to take short-term profits.
@ImTheSecretSquare - I'm no fish stick expert, but that's why you educate people so they can govern (and regulate) themselves - there is no need for big govt to run everything. Besides, I don't eat fish sticks, I know how to fish and I enjoy real food, not processed stuff.
I'm for small govt and free market, - it has a proven track record. It's only problem is the amount of weath it creates - you can't grow that wealthy for very long before big gov tries to take that over and control it
@383mazda Hope you enjoy the fish while you can - fish stocks are declining rapidly.
And small gov't and the free market actually has quite a bad track record - consider the massive boom-bust cycles throughout the 19th century. That's why we created the Fed in the first place, to stop the constant busts. Moderate government regulation has been the key to the United States' steady growth since 1945, it's what put us on top - and deregulation is what is dragging us under.
@holidayhouse03 Erm, you seem to make two different contradictory statements. Is moderate government regulation the problem or is it fractional reserve banking? Moderate government regulation was what STOPPED the bank induced boom-bust cycles - and it is the deregulation of the last twenty years that has restarted them.
@ImTheSecretSquare Govt is enormously bigger than it was in the 40's - we have more and more regulations every day and nothing is getting better. If you say "mild" regulation is what put us on top in the 40's than I'm 100% for going back to govt and regulations of that size!!!!!!! Again, regulation is needed, but not a ton and not dealing with everything. An educated and self reliant population does not need a large govt, or even a medium one for that matter.
@383mazda Government regulation was significantly greater in the 40s than it is now - spending has risen due to other factors. If you are truly 100% for going back to 40s-level regulation, well, I hate to tell you this, but that was when the Democrats had a near-lockdown on Congress. Between 1932 and 1994 the Republicans were only the majority party a few times, never for more than two years consecutively.
@ImTheSecretSquare Democrates of today and far different than they were back even ten years - "ask not what your counry can do for you, but what you can do for your country..." That quote is polar opposite of what democrates stand for today with all their entitlements and handouts.
Give me a list of all the regulations and taxes of the 40's compared to now. The govt just blew over $22 million in stimulous money to dead people - BIG GOVT = bad, Capatilism btw has a great track record
@383mazda :rolleyes: Between 1936 and 1980, the top marginal tax rate was never below 70%, and during the 1940s it was never below 81%. Today it is 35%. Your comments belie a total lack of understanding of the situation - indeed, you seem openly Democrat. The Jack Kennedy quote is a perfect example - you think that's for less taxes and regulation?! You do not seem to understand your own candidate's position nor do you have seem to have any historical perspective whatsoever.
@ImTheSecretSquare What did you have to make to qualify for 70% tax rates? And i'm usually pretty thick skinned, but calling me democratic crosses a line :) I'd like to think I'm pretty conservative. I'd like the fed govt to protect my boarders and make sure my money is worth something, that's it. I'm no history buff but you can see what results with socialism / communism - it's people are never free, not even close to what we are today. Total dependancy on a govt is not freedome
@jimbojim68 where is the money supposed to come from for people to collect ss and medicare, and all the other entitlements? Haven't you heard of a ponzi scheme, eventually there is not enough money to pay out? That's what ss and medicare are. Rand Paul is raising the issues to prevent the U.S. from falling off a cliff, but you care about is who is gonna give you cash for doing nothing!
@igotzfiveonit For years politicians have not dealt with the SS issue because it still had money in the till. But this year because of the economy SS is operating in the red. It is paying out more then it is getting in revenues. It has to be dealt with the time is now. We have to reform SS or raise SS tax to 18% and medicaid to 3% or cut benefits to the baby boomers in half. Even doing that just pushes the date up 7 years before it is bankrupt again. Real reform is needed now.
@igotzfiveonit Such big assumptions from a small-minded person. I'm a self-made business man employing 11 full-time employees. I get no help from the government and don't need any. It's called compassion. WWJD? That's my motto. Social security is sound and any problems are fixable if politicians would quit raiding it. Medicare needs work. These programs saved millions of the elderly from poverty in their old age, which used to be the norm.
hahha this ad is really irking conway too. He came on a talkshow and talked about how his attorneys are looking at the ad and possibly thinking of filing a lawsuit....
suing the paul campaign b/c he doesn't want to be associated with obama!!
Socialist: Wants control of determining how much of a fish, if any, you deserve per day - said socialist will confiscate fish from hard working fisherman and redistribute fish to those too lazy to fish on their own (and who, ironically, do not deserve any fish at all). Socialist endoctrinates population that they are entitled to fish - outlaws free fishing - hard working fisherman cannot fish enough - socialism fails.
@383mazda Oooh, are we indulging in blanket generalizations? I can come up with one!
Conservative: Wants to remove fishing regulations, resulting in overfishing and pollution by the fishing companies. Fishing stocks decline past the point of replacement, resulting in higher prices for fish and eventually the end of the world's fisheries, and bankruptcies and layoffs in fishing companies. (Google "world's declining fisheries" while we're on the subject.)
@ImTheSecretSquare People continue to eat fish? As I recall, in a socialist society, private companies get in bed with government and you end up with a "China." China is very socialist, and I'm guessing they aren't exactly an environmental standard to look up to.
@eifersucht2 Guessing isn't helpful. China has been the largest fishing nation for years. Like other nations, they started experiencing declines in their marine fisheries in the late 90s - unlike other nations, because of their ability to tightly regulate the industry, they've taken strong actions against the declines, including relocating fishermen and putting a moratorium on fishing during the hot season. They now have much stronger fisheries than we do.
@rcurren69 Yeah, 'cause that's why the subtitles are there. He's racist. It wouldn't be because someone with low or no hearing would want to watch the ad. Hell, are you sure those deaf people can even vote?
I am a big Rand Fan but I am very disappointed that his campaign has stooped to negative attack ads. Just tell us what YOU stand for Rand. Your ideas are great - you do not need to attack your opponent - it makes you look as sleazy as he is. Please clean up the campaign.
You can always tell when it is really Obama or not (no joking) because the REAL Obama has a very SSSSSibilant SSSSSS Hisss esssessss drive me crazy! Sssssorry! Next time you listen to Obama, notice this annoying (to me, anyway) trait.
This has been flagged as spam show
Thank you Senator Paul for voting against s. 1867.
Agustason 3 months ago
LOL
tjohn1986 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I am the voice of Barack Obama. Check out my videos
BarackObamasVoice 11 months ago
You kooky piece of shit liberals are going to get stomped if you don't get the fuck out of the way!!!
savemyplaylist 1 year ago
190 people didnt notice that the voice wasnt Obama's.
BTRADOV11 1 year ago
jack conway is a crook. he tried to cover up his brothers involvement with drugs. google it everyone. the media isn't trying to cover the story
cheba2k1 1 year ago
Funny ad. If Conway is a career politician.
.
Please stop sending the same establishment people back to DC, both Republican and Democrat.
.
Nothing changes even though they claim to stand for different things...
.
Vote Rand Paul.
jakesteel1 1 year ago
This is a hillarious ad... if someone likes conway over paul, im not sure they are sane. How could someone vote for an establishment career politician? Have you not learned anything the last 10 years? Wake up... maybe you have no idea what is going on as you walk around in your sheepish daze. We need new people.... not the same ol status quo!
odinsragess 1 year ago
Dems cut taxes.
Made it illegal for insurance companies to drop you if you get cancer.
Made refusing people because of pre-existing conditions illegal.
What's Rand Paul done except for tie a girl up and worship a bong?
watch123456 1 year ago
@watch123456 Dems cut taxes??? Dream on...
DarleneLittlejohn 1 year ago 3
@DarleneLittlejohn Obama didn't cut taxes??? Learn to google.
watch123456 1 year ago
@watch123456 Dems cut taxes???? LMFAO!!!! Neither party ever REALLY cuts taxes.... You're a dumbass....
govhater4 1 year ago
@watch123456
One problem with that. Insurance companies can still outright refuse you or make your payments 10k a month. Isn't that equivalent?
lambdaofbacon 1 year ago
You all know rand paul is soooo going to win!
This ad made me smile sooo big.
famasdan 1 year ago 3
@ACoolDudeProduction True!
famasdan 1 year ago
this some bullshit...how can anyone talk about Obama and on fuck ass Bush is the reason the US is the way it is. why no one talked about fuck face Bush this way...i like Obama cause he do not get into this bullshit.
MrDomino75 1 year ago
@MrDomino75 Whaaat bahaaha Bush is the same thing as obama name whats different under obama than bush.
famasdan 1 year ago
Conway has no opinion on the issues. His campaign is to personally attack Rand Paul. Conway is a loooser!
quizerry 1 year ago
Jack Conway has been dishing it out to Rand Paul since day number 1, but he sure as heck can't take it can he? What a crybaby! Good job Rand, I had a really good laugh. I would definitely vote for you if I lived in your state!
mirsaes 1 year ago
@darkhawk123 I get a kick of unintelligent people like you who would rather have an establishment, career politician (used car salesman) in office rather than a principaled, honest man.
odinsragess 1 year ago
@odinsragess I just think the state Republicans should have found a better candidate is all. This guy isn't all he should be. How am I am supposed to get excited about Ron Paul 2.1? He is going to run for president one day, and on that day I am going to be underwhelmed.
darkhawk123 1 year ago
Watching the Revolution unfold on November 2nd is going to be a great thing...
Can't WAIT!
wahahn 1 year ago 4
@wahahn I can't wait to post here on November 2rd when Paul, Paladino, Christie, O'Donnell, & all other Tea Party folks go down in flames. Your "the elections a fixed" cries will not help you sleep at night. They are terrible candidates running on an insane Populist policy of repeal everything from Social Security, to shutting down the Post Office, to shutting congress down. You folks HAVE no platform to run on. Just screaming "No". THAT'S why you'll loose
Bolgernow 1 year ago 6
@Bolgernow ...I'll see you here.
wahahn 1 year ago
@wahahn yes you will. That's the beauty of our process, your wild predictions trying to echo 1994 have consequences. You might not like the reality. Be well!
Bolgernow 1 year ago 7
@Bolgernow Everything from Social Security to Post Office will repeal themselves cause they are gonna go bankrupt.
dynomyght 1 year ago
@dynomyght functioning agencies existing since 1775, & 1935 will end? Your party has been screaming this after they were enacted, & now as they still work today. Nothing's perfect, & we can always strive for better, but I wish I could grant all your Tea Party uber right Libertarian views in place to watch you stand there screaming "What, I have to spend $6.47-$7.94 per letter to mail my Netflix back because I can only use UPS/Fed Ex/DHL?". Franklin would be a socialist to you nuts
Bolgernow 1 year ago 7
@Bolgernow BTW recently I posted something using the FedEx over the post office because it was cheaper then the post.
dynomyght 1 year ago
@dynomyght "posted"? You mean "mailed" or "sent"? Their rates are MUCH higher, they are premium services with a higher price. It's not debatable, it's economic fact. Now their are always exceptions like if you use Fed Ex to send a letter, but the Post Office to send a chair. The chair is higher because of size & weight. But compare the PO with Fed Ex for the same service. PO is almost always cheaper
Bolgernow 1 year ago 4
@Bolgernow It's not an economic fact. Every time I've mailed a package, FedEx and UPS had cheaper rates and were more reliable.
Garmichael1 1 year ago
@Garmichael1 you'd scream the world flat because you could. Your google is broken like your brain. Type in: Post Office vs Fed Ex Prices. You will get this from consumer reports. For the same size package next day air USPS is $36.85. For the same service from Fed Ex $73.50, & UPS $73.50. 2 Day Air USPS is $16.80, while for Fed Ex & UPS it's $43.65 each. Postal Service doesn’t add a fuel surcharge, & discounts for those using on-line shipping. You don't know what you're talking about
Bolgernow 1 year ago 4
@Bolgernow OK....So. Let's hear your BS now. And don't even mention O'Donnell she wasn't even picked to win from the start....
wahahn 1 year ago
Great Ad... Go Get-em Rand...!
scoutxlt 1 year ago 6
did he say Healfcare?
MaHaRushie 1 year ago
Jack your days of spending our money will soon be coming to an end !!
VOTE Rand Paul on 11-2
"In God we Still Trust." Jack Conway - not so much !!
TheTeaPartyMovement 1 year ago 6
Good taste and to the point!
klassylady25 1 year ago 7
Rand Paul survived countless media attacks for this whole race and is still ahead by 5 - 10 points.
abudabit 1 year ago 6
Media maggots hate Rand Paul because he obeys the spirtit of the US Constitution. Until these maggots in the Media are removed America will continue its spiral down the toilet.
coaltrader07 1 year ago 7
@coaltrader07, So you want to abridge the freedom of the press to defend the spirit of the Constitution?
darkhawk123 1 year ago
@darkhawk123 Jews have usurped our Media. Our entire Media is controlled by a wicked Jewish minority. In America we currently live under a Jewish Apartheid. To answer your question more directly I do not recommend abridging the freedom of press but the Media is the most powerful aparatus in the entire World. The power of suggestion. I'm open to all ideas but the bottom line is we need a "free" press. Not a wicked Marxist Jewish press.
coaltrader07 1 year ago
@coaltrader07 And this is why the Tea Party is bad for America.
darkhawk123 1 year ago
@darkhawk123 Unfortunately most tea party people are ignorant to this fact like you and even moreso they are most likely to be zionist. Nothing wrong w/ the Tea Party. I agree with about 90% of what they say as opposed to about 60% of republcian and maybe 20% democrat.
coaltrader07 1 year ago
@ks7800 Are you serious? You guys are a joke and you still think that by simply saying someone is a racists or that they want to starve old people or throw the kids our of school that anyone with half a brain believes you? Really?
Your day has come and thank God, gone. America will not be fooled by the likes of you and Jack Conway and they sure don't believe your lies anymore.
onceuponamidnightdry 1 year ago 3
@1911arthur
He wants people 55 and under to eventually pay. Having an adult conversation and not demagoguing the issue, most reasonable ppl would agree that medicare will be broke in a few years. Career Politician needs to admit that he supports 95% of the Obama Agenda, which is why he beat out the moderate Mongiardo. He was for cap/trade (w/ exceptions) before he was against, was for war in iraq before he was against it, and was for letting majority of bush tax cuts expire.
stoneecold23 1 year ago 2
@stoneecold23 No reasonable person would agree that Medicare is going to be broke in a few years. The latest projections show that the hospital fund will be insolvent in 2017 - however, it's worth noting that those same projections always show a near-term insolvency. From 1970 to 1999, the projected insolvency date was always before 2010 - yet it's not insolvent now. In 1970, the projected insolvency date was 1972. This is a question of taking in what we pay out, not radically changing Medicare.
ImTheSecretSquare 1 year ago
@ImTheSecretSquare
It is radically changing the system to tell future generations that in 20-30 years they may have to pay a higher deductible? What's reckless is letting career politicians like Jack-O scare senior citizens into voting for him, implying to them that Rand wants to slap them with a high deductible. The baby boomer population contradicts what you are saying. There will simply be far too large a population that is retired in the next decade, and we will need a higher deductible.
stoneecold23 1 year ago 4
20 sheep are still "hoping" for change they can believe in. LOL
goldcurrent1 1 year ago 2
Vote for Rand Paul in 2010!
wingfeathers00 1 year ago 4
Wow, all the talking points in one video!
obamaisfromkenya 1 year ago 2
Rand Paul 2010!
destinyson23 1 year ago 3
Pretty sure it was 200000. And I'm just saying, your political worldview seems to clearly coincide with the democrats'. Your comments about them are nothing more than partisan bile, they're meaningless.
ImTheSecretSquare 1 year ago
the best part about this ad is that it made conway furious. He came on a radio show and threatened to sue Paul and said that his attornies are looking at this commercial for false advertising.
He is going to sue Paul for linking him to Obama/Pelosi!!!
stoneecold23 1 year ago 17
Ron Paul could have used a few ads like this in 2008.
merrimac291 1 year ago
@merrimac291
this was basically obama's 08 campaign except with bush.
stoneecold23 1 year ago
@stoneecold23 no, this is way better than his campaign. The tone isn't mean-spirited but the message is clear. Obama never had a commercial that was as good as this one.
merrimac291 1 year ago
jack conway deleted my comment on americas inmate population and incarceration rates on the ad where he said your to soft on crime The United States has the highest documented incarceration rate in the world The U.S. incarceration rate on December 31, 2008 was 754 inmates per 100,000 U.S. residents, or 0.75%.[3] The USA also has the highest total documented prison and jail population in the world i think thats a address that needs to be issued when he says that again and he signs death warrants
bcrichplayer88 1 year ago
Clearly, the most amazing part of this ad is the phone. 8-6-7-5-3-0-9 !!!
sjc224 1 year ago
@sjc224 don't get it?
soicuw 1 year ago
I hate mud slinging. Too bad Rand doesn't follow in his fathers footsteps. Win or Lose....It doesn't matter if we lose our morality along the way. We can't act like the issue is as black and whaite as saying 'big govt' 'debt', etc....
Lets really talk about the issues. RON PAUL 2012!!!!
gary031183 1 year ago
that was AWSOME!!!!!!! DO IT AGAIN!!!!
threeredstars 1 year ago
Nice to see Rand actually allows comments on his videos, unlike Conway the Coward. Go, Rand!
daveswagon 1 year ago 2
truth
LibertyPoet
website
campaign4liberty 1 year ago
This is the first ad out of 4 adds where he attacks his opponent. On the other hand, look at how many adds Conway is putting on Rand attacking him....
FingerTapping 1 year ago
Con-way...
wdcsucks1 1 year ago
Rand's got the sack to allow comments on his campaign videos, democrat coward liberal scum hide behind their no-comment selection.
OBAMASTINKSLIKEANAPE 1 year ago 2
@fras1788 YOU NEED CAPITAL TO CREATE JOBS. THE ONLY WAY YOU GET CAPITAL IS THROUGH SAVINGS. WHO SAVES? HMMMMMMMMMMMMMM THE RICH. YOU, SIR, ARE THE MORON!
cgreenw9 1 year ago
A legitimate attack indeed. One cannot argue or dispute their own voting record.
madhatter0110 1 year ago
@Bain1998 Lol, most of the people I know involved in the Tea Party including myself are not religious. There is an overlapping between the Religious Right and the Tea Party, however, they are the nutcases. If they take up social issues as their main platform, they will fail. If not, they will succeed. Only time will tell.
ronpaulkid 1 year ago 2
THis is awesome
SteveBKNY 1 year ago
haha... your scenario is wrong - free market will stop everyone from trying to start a fishing company (supply and demand, you know, that thing that happens on its own without control of the govt.)
Here's another one:
Conservative - educate everyone and let them govern themselves
Socialist - sit down and shut up idiot, I am the elite, and I will do a better job of taking care of you than you yourself, I'll take everything you own and do what's best for the "greater good" / (rulling class)
383mazda 1 year ago
@383mazda That makes no sense - I don't even know if you read the post. The free market will not stop them from devastating the fisheries - that's precisely why they're in catastrophic decline. Fish sticks used to be cod, then they were haddock, then pollock as each was fished out from the North Atlantic fishery. Cod was listed as endangered by the WWF. Companies, particularly in today's fast-paced financial environment, are not structured so that they can refuse to take short-term profits.
ImTheSecretSquare 1 year ago
@ImTheSecretSquare - I'm no fish stick expert, but that's why you educate people so they can govern (and regulate) themselves - there is no need for big govt to run everything. Besides, I don't eat fish sticks, I know how to fish and I enjoy real food, not processed stuff.
I'm for small govt and free market, - it has a proven track record. It's only problem is the amount of weath it creates - you can't grow that wealthy for very long before big gov tries to take that over and control it
383mazda 1 year ago
@383mazda Hope you enjoy the fish while you can - fish stocks are declining rapidly.
And small gov't and the free market actually has quite a bad track record - consider the massive boom-bust cycles throughout the 19th century. That's why we created the Fed in the first place, to stop the constant busts. Moderate government regulation has been the key to the United States' steady growth since 1945, it's what put us on top - and deregulation is what is dragging us under.
ImTheSecretSquare 1 year ago
@ImTheSecretSquare
it was moderate govt regulation that caused the bank induced boom-bust cycles.
Fractional reserve banking is the problem and should be outlawed.
holidayhouse03 1 year ago
@holidayhouse03 Erm, you seem to make two different contradictory statements. Is moderate government regulation the problem or is it fractional reserve banking? Moderate government regulation was what STOPPED the bank induced boom-bust cycles - and it is the deregulation of the last twenty years that has restarted them.
ImTheSecretSquare 1 year ago
@ImTheSecretSquare Govt is enormously bigger than it was in the 40's - we have more and more regulations every day and nothing is getting better. If you say "mild" regulation is what put us on top in the 40's than I'm 100% for going back to govt and regulations of that size!!!!!!! Again, regulation is needed, but not a ton and not dealing with everything. An educated and self reliant population does not need a large govt, or even a medium one for that matter.
383mazda 1 year ago
@383mazda Government regulation was significantly greater in the 40s than it is now - spending has risen due to other factors. If you are truly 100% for going back to 40s-level regulation, well, I hate to tell you this, but that was when the Democrats had a near-lockdown on Congress. Between 1932 and 1994 the Republicans were only the majority party a few times, never for more than two years consecutively.
ImTheSecretSquare 1 year ago
@ImTheSecretSquare Democrates of today and far different than they were back even ten years - "ask not what your counry can do for you, but what you can do for your country..." That quote is polar opposite of what democrates stand for today with all their entitlements and handouts.
Give me a list of all the regulations and taxes of the 40's compared to now. The govt just blew over $22 million in stimulous money to dead people - BIG GOVT = bad, Capatilism btw has a great track record
383mazda 1 year ago
@383mazda :rolleyes: Between 1936 and 1980, the top marginal tax rate was never below 70%, and during the 1940s it was never below 81%. Today it is 35%. Your comments belie a total lack of understanding of the situation - indeed, you seem openly Democrat. The Jack Kennedy quote is a perfect example - you think that's for less taxes and regulation?! You do not seem to understand your own candidate's position nor do you have seem to have any historical perspective whatsoever.
ImTheSecretSquare 1 year ago
@ImTheSecretSquare What did you have to make to qualify for 70% tax rates? And i'm usually pretty thick skinned, but calling me democratic crosses a line :) I'd like to think I'm pretty conservative. I'd like the fed govt to protect my boarders and make sure my money is worth something, that's it. I'm no history buff but you can see what results with socialism / communism - it's people are never free, not even close to what we are today. Total dependancy on a govt is not freedome
383mazda 1 year ago
Cool ad. Rand Paul is good for America.
quizerry 1 year ago
@jimbojim68 where is the money supposed to come from for people to collect ss and medicare, and all the other entitlements? Haven't you heard of a ponzi scheme, eventually there is not enough money to pay out? That's what ss and medicare are. Rand Paul is raising the issues to prevent the U.S. from falling off a cliff, but you care about is who is gonna give you cash for doing nothing!
igotzfiveonit 1 year ago 29
@igotzfiveonit For years politicians have not dealt with the SS issue because it still had money in the till. But this year because of the economy SS is operating in the red. It is paying out more then it is getting in revenues. It has to be dealt with the time is now. We have to reform SS or raise SS tax to 18% and medicaid to 3% or cut benefits to the baby boomers in half. Even doing that just pushes the date up 7 years before it is bankrupt again. Real reform is needed now.
quizerry 1 year ago
@igotzfiveonit Such big assumptions from a small-minded person. I'm a self-made business man employing 11 full-time employees. I get no help from the government and don't need any. It's called compassion. WWJD? That's my motto. Social security is sound and any problems are fixable if politicians would quit raiding it. Medicare needs work. These programs saved millions of the elderly from poverty in their old age, which used to be the norm.
jimbojim68 1 year ago
LOL!
Intervene 1 year ago
I feel bad for Jack Conway, he must get alot of people calling looking for Jenny...
conman5304 1 year ago
hahha this ad is really irking conway too. He came on a talkshow and talked about how his attorneys are looking at the ad and possibly thinking of filing a lawsuit....
suing the paul campaign b/c he doesn't want to be associated with obama!!
stoneecold23 1 year ago 3
Really great, fun ad. But after seeing Jack's caller ID #, I can't get that Tommy Tutone song outta my head.
Schmauey 1 year ago 3
@Schmauey lol, wonder if Tommy Tutone's going to sue... :P
ImTheSecretSquare 1 year ago
Lovin the ad! Keep up the good work Rand. A win for you is within sight!
ronpaulkid 1 year ago 2
@HealingHerbalRemedy
Socialist: Wants control of determining how much of a fish, if any, you deserve per day - said socialist will confiscate fish from hard working fisherman and redistribute fish to those too lazy to fish on their own (and who, ironically, do not deserve any fish at all). Socialist endoctrinates population that they are entitled to fish - outlaws free fishing - hard working fisherman cannot fish enough - socialism fails.
Conservative: Wants to teach you how to fish
383mazda 1 year ago
@383mazda Oooh, are we indulging in blanket generalizations? I can come up with one!
Conservative: Wants to remove fishing regulations, resulting in overfishing and pollution by the fishing companies. Fishing stocks decline past the point of replacement, resulting in higher prices for fish and eventually the end of the world's fisheries, and bankruptcies and layoffs in fishing companies. (Google "world's declining fisheries" while we're on the subject.)
Socialist: People continue to eat fish.
ImTheSecretSquare 1 year ago
@ImTheSecretSquare crack kills
surrealnumber 1 year ago
@ImTheSecretSquare People continue to eat fish? As I recall, in a socialist society, private companies get in bed with government and you end up with a "China." China is very socialist, and I'm guessing they aren't exactly an environmental standard to look up to.
eifersucht2 1 year ago
@eifersucht2 Guessing isn't helpful. China has been the largest fishing nation for years. Like other nations, they started experiencing declines in their marine fisheries in the late 90s - unlike other nations, because of their ability to tightly regulate the industry, they've taken strong actions against the declines, including relocating fishermen and putting a moratorium on fishing during the hot season. They now have much stronger fisheries than we do.
ImTheSecretSquare 1 year ago
@rcurren69 Yeah, 'cause that's why the subtitles are there. He's racist. It wouldn't be because someone with low or no hearing would want to watch the ad. Hell, are you sure those deaf people can even vote?
johnathanpinkerton 1 year ago
@johnathanpinkerton Touche.
rcurren69 1 year ago
Better impression than the guy on SNL.
MooseOfReason 1 year ago 2
Go Rand Paul!
a4finger 1 year ago
Great, brilliant ad. I can't wait to see how quickly the democrats call you a racist though.
PatriotInChief 1 year ago
this is great stuff. stupid socialists will never get it.
cgreenw9 1 year ago
Brilliant!!
And for those bemoaning RP going negative, let me pass on a little advice I've learned through experience:
Don't try to take the politics out of politics.
johngalt23g 1 year ago
I am a big Rand Fan but I am very disappointed that his campaign has stooped to negative attack ads. Just tell us what YOU stand for Rand. Your ideas are great - you do not need to attack your opponent - it makes you look as sleazy as he is. Please clean up the campaign.
sonrider657 1 year ago
LOVE IT~!!!!!!
flyinbry 1 year ago
@Conradka
What else can you say to a socialist besides "NO!"
twk373 1 year ago 2
@Conradka because the president always has the best interests of americans in mind, right? ....right?
imgdumpprep 1 year ago 2
ha ha ha ha!!! Fantastic. Didn't think you could top "the machine", but this one is just awesome. Landslide for Rand. The times they are a changin!!
badonkadonk34 1 year ago
Oh, man... That's the best political attack ad I've seen in a long, long time.
-jcr
NSResponder 1 year ago 2
Along with a whole lot of other things, when 2011 rolls around, Ron needs to get Rand's political ad team.
promontorium 1 year ago
Finally an attack on Conway. Go Rand Paul.
dynomyght 1 year ago 24
@dynomyght Rand Paul can't win without attack ads. Attack, Rand, attack! Or lose.
JackConwaySucks 1 year ago
This even tops the Pelosi as the wicked witch of the west ad.
Csmallo 1 year ago
Best political ad of the season! Conway can take his drug task force and shove it - he's so proud of himself.
P0LICEstateWATCH 1 year ago 2
Very clever ad. I like it :P
RangerMcFriendlie 1 year ago
This is sooo funny
NicPap12 1 year ago
You can always tell when it is really Obama or not (no joking) because the REAL Obama has a very SSSSSibilant SSSSSS Hisss esssessss drive me crazy! Sssssorry! Next time you listen to Obama, notice this annoying (to me, anyway) trait.
DancinKittehNomNom 1 year ago
classic! classic!! keep it going Rand! You have to also say this: 'A vote for Conway is a vote for Obama!
Comedystreak 1 year ago 2
awesome :)
maddies1 1 year ago
This might be my new fave ad of the year
Flamesdupont 1 year ago
LOL
aircooledvw62 1 year ago
that's nice
Donattello1 1 year ago