The ST would more than likely win any way, but something didn't seem right about the old RS there. I know from personal experience that they are quicker than that, the driver probably wasn't up to it.
Actually the RS never had that much power accelerating, the RS's territory is not a straight line, it's the curves. And by the way, the ST does have 10 more horse power and another cilinder.
gunk build ups in areas of the engine that are designed to move without a lot of friction cause a loss of engine power output. its not rocket science mate!
what a tit you really are! gunk buids up?? un less you are reffereing carbon deposits on the valves?? which isnt even herd of nowadays now that weuse better rfined pertol! and you might might get it on a diesel driven by an old man !
they have just announced its going to be 295 bhp actually, with qaife LSD and a special anti-torque steer front axle design. think it might need it!!!!
also the figure quoted for the RS of 212 bhp was a "minimum guaranteed output" for that car. most RSs put on a rolling road with no modifications are putting out 220 to 230 bhp, and hitting 60 in aroun 6 dead.
It's not the power that makes the difference but the overall control. You will understand if you drive it. It's not so difficult to tune it to 280 HP though...but 350HP is extreme enough for a factory FWD car and I don't think that it could pass the emission standards.
kala k ta 2 ine super :) pedia thelo na rotiso kati an kseri kanenas na mou pi an valoun kontra ena focus st me ena golf gti 5 pio ine pio grigoro? pistevo to focus ala edo pou meno ta evalan kontra 2 tetia k kerdise to gti...ego pistevo pos den ginete afto ama to exi mama to gti ektos k an exi programa pragma pou den to paradehete o odigos tou an kseri kanenas na mou pi:) thanx FORD 4ever
This ST is tuned about to 300hp, I have drove it and believe me it is VERY powerful, more than RS. It also has much more torque. The RS is better in the track though, it is revving easier, it has better setup and it is a little bit lighter. Remember...both RS and the ST are TUNED.
Ok ok but of all forms the RS it is easy to promote to changing the electrovalve and puts in 280cv .... serious sufficient to happen to the st because this traction is better
No, it's FWD. You should have noticed at the top gear episodes that they compare it with other FWD "sport hatches" like the Astra OPC and the Golf GTI. The USA ST is the Euro ST170 but with 2.3 engine (of the same type) and some external differences.
its actually the fact that the rs is fwd and the st is rwd, the st can put its power down fast than the rs, simply because of this 200+bhp in a fwd is well, not that useful
so the ST has a bigger engine, more power and torque, but it does weigh more so the power times are generally the same but with the ST having a higher top speed.
yes the ST is heavyer but The standard ST on fords own tests went round the Nurburgring 10 seconds faster than the RS did which having drove round it myself is a bloody scary thing (well for my first couple of laps!)!
all the car's magazines said that the RS is faster than the ST . in this vids,we can see that the RS start is acceleration after the ST , but he seems to be faster
im with jayrave4 on that when ever i take mine to shows or cruzes everyone says mine looks loads better than the new one oh and i would totaly piss all over that st :-)
does the camera have some sort of illness?! CP?!
xBuzz996 3 months ago
is it a ford meet or something as there is many pre facelift performance focus there :)
Spoonerqwerty 7 months ago
@Spoonerqwerty It's a Club Ford Hellas meeting...
zike500 7 months ago
st jumped the start
matthewruss 8 months ago
you need the new rs vs the st
Aphasia17 8 months ago
ante re elladaraa!!
pasxalisr 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Both slow and shite , new focus rs is the one
praizedalord 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@praizedalord new rs is a heap of shite, too much power to the front wheels
jakelad7 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
torque steer and understeer , any front wheel drive car is shite , but if its a ford its either cozzy or new RS
praizedalord 2 years ago
Bun out negativity.
RustyL121 2 years ago
The ST would more than likely win any way, but something didn't seem right about the old RS there. I know from personal experience that they are quicker than that, the driver probably wasn't up to it.
Fisherdaz1 2 years ago 6
That C1 is bad ass!
DavidBlues 2 years ago 2
Ill race ya! Its not the power you got, its how well you know your car - RS all the way everyday.
tobias269 2 years ago 3
My ST3 would eat the RS! Anyone wanna race! And I'm a girl by the way!!!
BonusBegg 2 years ago
depends on what money you have to spend on a car
atvjoel17 2 years ago
an st??? a focus st is slower and less powerfull than the rs...
jaffacake1578 2 years ago
Actually the ST is more powerful, but not as fast 0-60.
ST - 223bhp - 0-60 (6.8) top speed - 150mph
RS (mk1) - 212bhp - 0-60 (6.5) top speed - 147mph
Technically the RS should be faster up to say 70-80mph then the higher torque of the ST should win it some ground back heading past 100mph.
RSTdave88 2 years ago 6
no yo idiot i meant the new rs...
jaffacake1578 2 years ago
Man the original shape is so much better than the new one.
AdamAus85 2 years ago 4
yer the rs would win 300bhp im a ford mechanic i been in 1 :) out in march
01mshaw 2 years ago
id have either of these over my standard 2 litre focus lol
Scaura90 2 years ago
what engine is in the ST?
the new one or the engine that was in the 170?
FooolishBlad 3 years ago
The new one (5 cylinder Volvo) dude.
zike500 3 years ago
its the volvo T5 engine 2.5 litre
dewsroberts 3 years ago
@FooolishBlad man this is new focus this is 2.5 TURBO dude
JDmohamed 1 year ago
@JDmohamed Focus RS is 2.5 but no Turbo... :)
Sh0Krusevac 6 months ago
@Sh0Krusevac All focus RS is Turbo and new too 2.5 R5 Turbo :)
JDmohamed 6 months ago
@FooolishBlad 2.0l a think
06tolsonl 1 year ago
driving the rs was a twat, would cane the st with a good driver, and a nice clean engine bay!
dannyt123123 3 years ago
Actually the RS never had that much power accelerating, the RS's territory is not a straight line, it's the curves. And by the way, the ST does have 10 more horse power and another cilinder.
LH287 3 years ago
a nice clean engine bay? :S haha whats that got to do with speed lmao
baileymate 2 years ago
gunk build ups in areas of the engine that are designed to move without a lot of friction cause a loss of engine power output. its not rocket science mate!
dannyt123123 2 years ago
what a tit you really are! gunk buids up?? un less you are reffereing carbon deposits on the valves?? which isnt even herd of nowadays now that weuse better rfined pertol! and you might might get it on a diesel driven by an old man !
harryh2410 2 years ago
nice vid the st against the 09 verson of rs will the rs win :P lol
stabakfan 3 years ago 2
pure porn for my eyes/ears
yaroukh 3 years ago
Great video guys....
dreamscience 3 years ago
Thank you!!! :D
zike500 3 years ago
well all i know is that i aint going buy a rs now
scoobydoowrxturbo 3 years ago
Yes, all the 3 cars are tuned. The ST at the time of the shot had I/C, CAIS, Magnex full exhaust and Dreamscience reflash
zike500 3 years ago
is that focus st standard or has it got modifications ?
jimjimea 3 years ago
the RS version focus is a nicer car to look at by a country mile....
dewsroberts 3 years ago
i swear my car is faster then that
same 20k 07n plate
JamezQuinn 3 years ago
i got my st for 20k 07plate
ruddyy123 3 years ago
thanks by the way
cp7819 3 years ago
mmmm anybody know roughly the price.....
cp7819 3 years ago
is the rs 09 gonna have four wheel drive anybody know?
cp7819 3 years ago
no, its gonna be front drive with limited slip diff and a special anti-torque steer front axle design....quadri-knuckle or something
soundseeker63 3 years ago
Thats with alls tock parts right? just the straight out stats?
Currly747 3 years ago
2002 FOCUS RS:
Horsepower: 212
0-60Mph Time: 6.4 Sec
Top Speed: 144 Mph
Displacement: 1988CC (2 Litre/2.0L)
dancyou2b 3 years ago
Horsepower: 225
0-60Mph Time: 6.8 Sec
Top Speed: 150mph
Displacement: 2.5 Litre/2.5L
dancyou2b 3 years ago
^ 2008 FOCUS ST
dancyou2b 3 years ago
2009 FOCUS RS:
Horsepower: 280
0-60Mph Time: 5.9 Sec
Top Speed: 155Mph (Limited)
Displacement: 2.5 Litre/2.5L
dancyou2b 3 years ago
they have just announced its going to be 295 bhp actually, with qaife LSD and a special anti-torque steer front axle design. think it might need it!!!!
soundseeker63 3 years ago
even better!!! It's gonna be a monster!!
dancyou2b 3 years ago
Best Stats:
1. 2009 Focus RS
2. 2008 Focus ST
3. 2002 Focus RS
There you have it! Proven!
dancyou2b 3 years ago
also the figure quoted for the RS of 212 bhp was a "minimum guaranteed output" for that car. most RSs put on a rolling road with no modifications are putting out 220 to 230 bhp, and hitting 60 in aroun 6 dead.
soundseeker63 3 years ago
they could have whacked 350 brake out of the rs but no 212bhp fuk off u silly german cunts more power next time please !
essex9207 3 years ago
It's not the power that makes the difference but the overall control. You will understand if you drive it. It's not so difficult to tune it to 280 HP though...but 350HP is extreme enough for a factory FWD car and I don't think that it could pass the emission standards.
zike500 3 years ago
mamisia to st einai grigorotero.exei o pateras mou st kai ksero
rambogr 3 years ago
kala k ta 2 ine super :) pedia thelo na rotiso kati an kseri kanenas na mou pi an valoun kontra ena focus st me ena golf gti 5 pio ine pio grigoro? pistevo to focus ala edo pou meno ta evalan kontra 2 tetia k kerdise to gti...ego pistevo pos den ginete afto ama to exi mama to gti ektos k an exi programa pragma pou den to paradehete o odigos tou an kseri kanenas na mou pi:) thanx FORD 4ever
bboysenso 3 years ago
RS is more better than shit ST
SPD13TDI 3 years ago
yeah it showed
ryanengland007 3 years ago
ok
the focus rs is fastest than focus st.....more more fast... scuse me my poor english....
txebeguevara 4 years ago
This ST is tuned about to 300hp, I have drove it and believe me it is VERY powerful, more than RS. It also has much more torque. The RS is better in the track though, it is revving easier, it has better setup and it is a little bit lighter. Remember...both RS and the ST are TUNED.
zike500 4 years ago
Ok ok but of all forms the RS it is easy to promote to changing the electrovalve and puts in 280cv .... serious sufficient to happen to the st because this traction is better
txebeguevara 4 years ago
wrong rs 212 bhp st 225 bhp
starscreamno1 3 years ago
yep zike500 ur correct!!! i watched the episode (FULL), and yep it's FWD... still waaaay better than the focus ford gives us in the U.S.!!!!!!!!!
SVTF 4 years ago
to palio apla den pezetai guys ..........
arkos031 4 years ago
um i always thought the (euro) ST's were AWD... i seen it on one of the top gear episodes... oh and the U.S focus st is N/A fwd..
SVTF 4 years ago
No, it's FWD. You should have noticed at the top gear episodes that they compare it with other FWD "sport hatches" like the Astra OPC and the Golf GTI. The USA ST is the Euro ST170 but with 2.3 engine (of the same type) and some external differences.
zike500 4 years ago
all euro focus's are FWD.
Focus ST is always gonna win against focus RS.
Focus ST has 2.5 5cylinder turbo - 225bhp
Focus RS has 2.0 4cylinder turbo - 212bhp
Focus ST has more torque and bhp, but i think Focus RS is the nicer looking car.
fentonjd 4 years ago
dont talk out ur ass, they are both front wheel drive, the st is running 225bhp and the rs ruuns 212bhp standard, both of them are front wheel drive
fezcrew 4 years ago
its actually the fact that the rs is fwd and the st is rwd, the st can put its power down fast than the rs, simply because of this 200+bhp in a fwd is well, not that useful
L3389 4 years ago
Wake up...both cars are FWD...
zike500 4 years ago
the point is that the st is better, cus it have more horse power and is newest.
alonsoarino 4 years ago
& THE POINT OF THIS CLIP IS
zohebj 4 years ago
yeah yeah yeah ~
they are both nice FF cars
mikest170tw 4 years ago
not sure what magazines you read, the RS isnt faster than the ST. they are roughly the same but with the ST being a bit more refined.
Engine specs below for both
Standard ST: 2.5, 5 cylinder turbo, 225 BHP 260 ft/lb Torque.
Standard RS: 2.0, 4 cylinder turbo, 212 BHP 229 Ft/lb torque.
so the ST has a bigger engine, more power and torque, but it does weigh more so the power times are generally the same but with the ST having a higher top speed.
dave619uk 4 years ago
dont forget the weight
mikest170tw 4 years ago
yes the ST is heavyer but The standard ST on fords own tests went round the Nurburgring 10 seconds faster than the RS did which having drove round it myself is a bloody scary thing (well for my first couple of laps!)!
dave619uk 4 years ago
Don't forget that the cars in the video are tuned. Car magazines test normal cars (except WR&GGR projects).
zike500 4 years ago
all the car's magazines said that the RS is faster than the ST . in this vids,we can see that the RS start is acceleration after the ST , but he seems to be faster
Trystelune 4 years ago
that's cyprus isn't it? dhekelia road?
pistta 4 years ago
No dude. It's a Greek video at Malakasa...
zike500 4 years ago
im with jayrave4 on that when ever i take mine to shows or cruzes everyone says mine looks loads better than the new one oh and i would totaly piss all over that st :-)
hemelRScrew 4 years ago
ela to trelo tsai....ela ela :P:P:P:P
st225gr 4 years ago
That ST has a lovely 2.5 in it
actionjackson81 4 years ago
I didn't like it too when it went into production. I like it now though 3 years after its debut. RS is awesome of course!
zike500 4 years ago
Just my opinion mate - don't like them. Don't doubt the ST's performance though.
jayrave4 4 years ago
The Focus RS is miles better looking. The ST is ugly.
jayrave4 4 years ago 2
Realy? So why there are many ST sold?
zike500 4 years ago
Both RS are tuned aproximetly to 260-280 hp as well as the ST (WR300).
zike500 4 years ago
wtf i thought the RS was faster than ST, hmm, i still thinkin
privateochoa 4 years ago