@genkers You could also use the general case, where Fg = mg. You'd get the same result through variable terms (even for the tension) after a little bit of algebraic simplification.
At 0:58 it's easy to assume that the acceleration would be greater for the system on the right because m1 is on a level surface instead of hanging down. The system on the left has m1 hanging down., which makes it easy to assume that the acceleration would be slower. Would such assumptions be right?
Nice vid but i got a question i cant seem to figure out... so for my questions the givens are m1=5kg Ft= 78.4 and a=5.9m/s the unknown is m2.. it seems so simple but i cant get it together, think u could give me a formula??
@aceofspadesz Luckily, my physics teacher is about as good if not better than this guy, however... I like having 2 different explanations for the same thing. So I love them both equally.
what if i dont know the forces pulling on it?
genkers 1 week ago
@genkers He was assuming the gravity was 10 m/s^2,
so 2kg had a force of 20 N, 3 kg, had a force of 30 N
finom97 1 week ago
@genkers You could also use the general case, where Fg = mg. You'd get the same result through variable terms (even for the tension) after a little bit of algebraic simplification.
CessnaToBoeing 2 days ago
OHMYGOD!!! This is like the best video ever ! I have my physics final in a few days and you are a lifesaver! thank you so much! xD
Inggybaby99 1 month ago
I love you- thank you so much
icepenguin2468 2 months ago
hey dude,,,i understood everuthing,bt i couldnt understand y r u putting 20n-ft =2m/s square.....becoz before dat u put, ft - 30n = 2m/s square
badhrinarayanansures 3 months ago
finally, I understand how to do these problems :D
pierresstargirl 3 months ago
At 0:58 it's easy to assume that the acceleration would be greater for the system on the right because m1 is on a level surface instead of hanging down. The system on the left has m1 hanging down., which makes it easy to assume that the acceleration would be slower. Would such assumptions be right?
jityr2 4 months ago
'mmkay' lol
NationalPro 4 months ago
how did he get the 20n and the 30n, or did he jsut make that up?
ymxyy0313 5 months ago
@ymxyy0313 i think he is stating that the acceleration of gravity is roughly 10m/s^2 so the resulting force is 20N and 30N repectively
coyotehunter118 5 months ago
@ymxyy0313 he multiplied the mass x gravitational force = 2 * 10 and 3 *10
euquerohotidogi 3 months ago
Nice vid but i got a question i cant seem to figure out... so for my questions the givens are m1=5kg Ft= 78.4 and a=5.9m/s the unknown is m2.. it seems so simple but i cant get it together, think u could give me a formula??
GodlessNfree 9 months ago
u pwn my physics teacher
aceofspadesz 9 months ago
@aceofspadesz Luckily, my physics teacher is about as good if not better than this guy, however... I like having 2 different explanations for the same thing. So I love them both equally.
HabeKeinMitleid 5 months ago 2
i totally needed this for my physics class today! thanks so much!!!
yamimakaiz 11 months ago
kool
anewman644 1 year ago
Thanks Lasse Viren...it helps a lot!!!
PoohTech90 1 year ago
ty
cuadfromts 1 year ago
What is the value of g where you live? It seems to be quite a bit different round here.
donepearce 1 year ago
Thank you so much!
razumnyr 1 year ago
he sounds like brain from pinky and the brain dude!!! thanks your a great teacher!
MyBrokenBrick 1 year ago
Thank you so much! my teacher didn't explain this type of problem very well. I'm not confused any more!
sprocket609 1 year ago
Clear explanation. Thanks. Like Lasse Viren. I am from Finland..
Paivimehr 1 year ago
giggity
mikeyjz 1 year ago
thank you!
41xUnderclass 1 year ago
the introduction is a bit long
but the later explanations are really clear! thanks a lot
toaotou 1 year ago