Id love to see the videos have genuine intros, maybe play the sound of the sea for a few seconds, then bring the piano in (while showing intro titles on black) then fade through black to your video? good work though! :D
@GordanNia the aspect ratio is basically how tall and wide any video clip is. Standard definition footage is usually at the 4:3 aspect ratio, or a square looking video. High definition is usually 16:9, or a rectangular video. And now how to change it: in the effects tab in FCP, open "Matte" then drag "Widescreen" to the desired clip. Double click the clip. Select the "Filters" tab in the viewer. Next, use the drop down menu under "Widescreen" (where it should say 4:3 or 16:9) to control the as
Too much handheld movment for a shot that is trying to look like film.... also, try under exposing a few stops bcause your water (breaking waves) are burned out too much as well, this is a dead giveaway for video. Tripod with slow movment is the best way to go. If you want to add depth of field lens effects try small amounts of zooming while focused up close on something in macro mode.
it would look more film looking if there wasn't left and right black sides. I like the moment in 0:39 - 0:44 looks good... espacially I like the camera going the way up... did you use DIY crane?
not really, if you look you can build your own for really cheap, it's less of a crane and more of a fulcrum positioned with a counter weight on one end to balance it all out
Not necessarily... you also need a mechanism that will keep the axial plane of the camera constant (ie, if you're shooting parallel to the ground, as you most commonly would, you don't want the camera to rotate upwards, as in a massive tilt). Typically this would be accomplished by hinging your primary support to another support bar, in a parallelogram configuration. It's hard to explain, but if you look at a professional unit you should be able to see what I mean...
True enough; mechanically it's pretty simple and it only needs to be strong--not necessarily precise (as in a follow focus or complex mattebox, which, although simple in concept, do require a fair bit of engineering... but I digress). The jib shot looks good. :]
Getting a film look is hard for YouTube because of the way they re-encode your uploaded video. Generally speaking, encoding your video to 23.978fps will gain interesting results, however with YouTube it could bash it up during re-encoding for the web.
haha well im no expert dude and i use sony and canon cameras usually but you will probly wanna go into the menu and usually somewhere in there theres a picture of a tape or it says tape or recording options etc. anyways fiddle around with it and it doesnt need to be EXACTLY 24 p just as long as you can slow down the rate of film hope that helped lol
I've got the recording option, what should I do next? I can't 'fiddle' it out, lol. =P
Does this mean that I have to record with my USB cable in the laptop, and walk around with my laptop while recording? Haha, I don't get it. Please explain it more detailed, thanks!
ooooh i see no no no its not quite like that. 24 p is a measure of the rate of frames per second which the camera films at. Its irrelevant to the computer. for example if you wanted to film something really slow it would probably be filming at a much higher rate of frames per second than the camera in this video, which is filming at 24 p. if you hve trouble you should see if you can find an online manual on google for you camera or something like that. hope this helped
yes, I think it's called revers telecine or kinescope which allows you to convert 30fps into 24fps on some non linear editing programs, however I'm not to sure
There's something about it that just isn't convincing as film. I think it's the low dynamic range and the infinitely deep focus of digital. The static shot was the closest, though.
If he added some contrast to it but shot with a higher shutter speed, it would more closely resemble the look and jitteriness of film. 1/48 is recommended, but go higher than that and you get more strobe.
You are half right. Let me explain: a higher shutter speed means more of your scene is in focus (assuming you don't zoom). The more you have in focus, the more static each frame looks because you have less motion blur- and more strobe.
You are correct to say that a lower shutter speed than the native frame rate also causes jitter- but this is for a different reason. When you lower the shutter speed too far, you also drop your frame rate because the shutter is closed longer.
You're still only half right. Yes, an open iris will make the focus shallower, but strobe has everything to do with the staticity and clarity of each frame. The more motion blur you have, the less strobe. The lower the shutter speed, the more motion blur. Depth of field, aperture, and shutter speed are all related to each other.
I haven't done live action, but in animation Strobe is another word for flicker. It's usually used to imply jerky movement, while flicker connotes inconsistent exposure levels from one frame to the next. I'm not trying to patronize you, but you're posting inaccuracies and claiming them as fact. Just read what you wrote... Why on earth would a low shutter speed be more jittery? In live action, video has long been considered un-filmlike because of its 1/60th shutter speed.
The higher your shutter speed, the less the motion blur. Motion blur makes moving objects appear to be smooth because of their lack of spatial definition. Because of persistence of vision, anything in sharp focus moving too fast will jitter because your eyes can not connect up the images as well as they can when it's out of focus. This is basic film theory. I only know it this well because it crosses over into animation. Live action and animation use the same illusion to convey movement.
@donmation I film often hense my intimate understanding of how s.s and aperture affect the image being reproduced. But I think what we have here is a misunderstanding of terms.Semantics. jittery for example is a subjective term. What it means to you could be completely different from what it means to me. Now I have a camera in my hand right now and around 1/8th S.S. the image starts jumping and seemingly skipping frames. "jittery". You say mine are text book definitions and inaccuracies. What?
Now we're getting somewhere! You are thinking in terms of less than 1/48 of a second. I don't have a DSLR that can shoot video, so I have no experience with that, but the Kodak Zi6 drops its shutter speed in low light, halving the frame rate so what you've said about 1/8 of a second looking stuttery, that makes sense. But considering that a shutter speed that low is not generally used in live action cinematography, except for a certain effect, that's where I got confused.
I think the best way to get the "film look" is to shoot with a bolex H16 (a 16mm camera, $250 off ebay) using 16mm short ends bought from a vendor in hollywood or off ebay ($5/100'). Then get it processed with a student discount, edit it with a film splicer (cement not tape) and telecine (sd with a student discount) That will get you the film look, by shooting on film.
But people still want to shoot video and make it look like film, because people have a dilusion that film is too expensive to be lagisticaly possible, but when you are diligent with film, and take the time to research the best deals and shoot short ends/recans/buybacks, you can make a 15min short shot on 2 perf 35mm for $250 more than one shot on a red.
Just like in the music world, everything is digital but they try to get the vintage, analog sound.. it's because we want things to look and sound like the stuff we grew up watching, but we want the convenience of digital technology.. actually shooting in film sucks and is hard.. shooting in digital then clicking on the "film look" plugin is way easier.. some day we will want to replicate youtube videos or some stupid shit lol
I agree, I love shooting 16mm on music videos and on nature documentaries (stuff that normally doesn't require sinc) however, a good CP16r (reflex) camera can be bought for $1000-1750 on ebay, this camera is chrystal sync and is quiet enough to record sync sound (the blair witch project film portion+almost all news pre-digital), another more expensive alternative is the arriflex 16BL ($1750-3000)
This is still cheaper than most video cameras (up front investment)
hi everyone thats cool ı mean great video looks professionel even though it is home made...bu there is something ı wonder so much. what is the music?who is that playing the piano? is there anyone who knows? please telll us
needs levels adjusted, needs to b more dynamic. and with that kinda music it feels like it should be slowed down. like filmed in 60i and slowed to 23.97. increase the red curve and lower the blue. more contrast. that'll look more like a film then
I have to say I watched all three of your film look tests, which I think were all shot on DV. They all looked phenomenal! The cinematography was most impressive for me. Whoever is cam oping your shots is doing well, and the whoever is designing the shots is equally as good. Closely followed is the post production work. The color correction was superb! I wish I could of heard some of the audio, but I am guessing all you had was the on camera mic. In which case the music was a nice touch.
calling this beautiful would be a textbook case of understatement.
Every scene had me in awe of what you've achieved.
I mean how did you get the crane effect, with the camera rising into the air? Looked really professional and I'm bending my brain trying to figure out how you did it! lol
Last scene is excellent(was it shot with a crane?). Got the film mood in full. In the earlier scenes a few camera shakes spoof the effect, but quality image is top notch.
What is the name of the song on your video?
fedevelasco1 1 day ago
Check out " L I N D A" - New Short on my page. Thanks
anthonyt87 5 months ago
Id love to see the videos have genuine intros, maybe play the sound of the sea for a few seconds, then bring the piano in (while showing intro titles on black) then fade through black to your video? good work though! :D
offspringy 5 months ago
@offspringy Glad you liked it. I have made a new short "L I N D A" which can be found on my page. Thanks !
anthonyt87 5 months ago
How did you get it to look like this? Looks clear and nice.
hobodealer 8 months ago
verry nice song
Micha78er 8 months ago
What camera / lens did you use for this? Settings? Filters? This looks beautiful.
ledhed1488 8 months ago
@GordanNia the aspect ratio is basically how tall and wide any video clip is. Standard definition footage is usually at the 4:3 aspect ratio, or a square looking video. High definition is usually 16:9, or a rectangular video. And now how to change it: in the effects tab in FCP, open "Matte" then drag "Widescreen" to the desired clip. Double click the clip. Select the "Filters" tab in the viewer. Next, use the drop down menu under "Widescreen" (where it should say 4:3 or 16:9) to control the as
pianoguy101 9 months ago
What is theaspect ratio? How do I get it from 16:9 through FCP?
GordanNia 10 months ago
Needs more contrasting I think
superduploman 11 months ago
It looks like a french movie that means : BORING !!!!
mreinstein48 1 year ago
was that a camera crane you were using when the guy was walking by....nice work man
PerminantPhase 1 year ago
try using some dof effects in post... and slow it down a step
RiseAndFall83 1 year ago
byron bay!
daeubner 1 year ago
At 00:28, it's beautiful
Colariboo 1 year ago
Too much handheld movment for a shot that is trying to look like film.... also, try under exposing a few stops bcause your water (breaking waves) are burned out too much as well, this is a dead giveaway for video. Tripod with slow movment is the best way to go. If you want to add depth of field lens effects try small amounts of zooming while focused up close on something in macro mode.
LanceCampeau 1 year ago
I like these shots. That piano song is great!
KlassicID 1 year ago
these shots are gorgeous!
Pok3rF4ce 1 year ago
What did you use to give it the look?
NBlunierProductions 1 year ago
Indie Film Look*
thecakeisbake 1 year ago
try reducing the frame rate a little bit?
extremehockeyfan 1 year ago
what!! howd you get that crain effect?? so amazing
OuchByGriff 1 year ago
Good look!
minibiels 1 year ago
need smoother transitions and less camera movement...
hoss021 1 year ago
It is very well done ... exept the music, sorry
mreinstein48 1 year ago
if u used the camera i think u did, u spent 11,000 dollars on it. U could buy 55 ipads wit dat!
BillyTheAlienVideo 1 year ago
this sounds like fire flower adobe after effects
PandemicNight 1 year ago
great job !!
shamsham1983 1 year ago
wow. how did you get that last shot? Was it with a crane?
gershonsqs 1 year ago
it would look more film looking if there wasn't left and right black sides. I like the moment in 0:39 - 0:44 looks good... espacially I like the camera going the way up... did you use DIY crane?
sebastiansz 1 year ago
Nice video. What camera, editing program and song are being used?
g0thman 1 year ago
Excellent, would be good trying to do different arears
matthew2408 1 year ago
is this song from the truman show?
treenut22 2 years ago
Great song.. Great film...!
ThePoster100 2 years ago
very nice! How'd you get that spotlight effect?
xopooshkinox 2 years ago
Sony Begas: Bumpmap
alfredonski 2 years ago
hahah i use begas tooo
KingSkulkZ 2 years ago
VERY NICE!!
Csuperjo1 2 years ago
What tols did you use because im working on my look?
TexanATX22 2 years ago
Yeah, how did you do the camera raise effect? Really cool video!
dcallstar51 2 years ago
it's a crane/jib shot, the cameral is on a crane and is raised up and can give some really cool epic shots
conorthedestroyer 2 years ago 2
This video looks kind of amateur (but still great) to be using a crane/jib, which sounds expensive.
dcallstar51 2 years ago
not really, if you look you can build your own for really cheap, it's less of a crane and more of a fulcrum positioned with a counter weight on one end to balance it all out
conorthedestroyer 2 years ago
Not necessarily... you also need a mechanism that will keep the axial plane of the camera constant (ie, if you're shooting parallel to the ground, as you most commonly would, you don't want the camera to rotate upwards, as in a massive tilt). Typically this would be accomplished by hinging your primary support to another support bar, in a parallelogram configuration. It's hard to explain, but if you look at a professional unit you should be able to see what I mean...
shinWangXiao 2 years ago
I know what you mean and it is a fairly simple thing to build on your own
conorthedestroyer 2 years ago
True enough; mechanically it's pretty simple and it only needs to be strong--not necessarily precise (as in a follow focus or complex mattebox, which, although simple in concept, do require a fair bit of engineering... but I digress). The jib shot looks good. :]
shinWangXiao 2 years ago
jib arm/crane
freddocapretto 2 years ago 2
how did you raise the camera at 0.41 looks good!
MaximumProductionz 2 years ago
the last shot looks really good. its a little jerky/shaky but that can be fixed with Smoothcam on FCP. Nice job
keyboardsurgery 2 years ago
looks cool!
cinescopefilms 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Sorry, man, but this is fail
Brutalexecution 2 years ago
to achieve film look first thing u need to get right is ur video setting. you need to set the fps to 24p for fk sake.
DidHeFart 2 years ago
Getting a film look is hard for YouTube because of the way they re-encode your uploaded video. Generally speaking, encoding your video to 23.978fps will gain interesting results, however with YouTube it could bash it up during re-encoding for the web.
My encoding for HD and SD is:
HD
1280x720p 23.978fps H.264, 5,000,000 CBR. AVC 192kbps.
SD
640x360 16:9 23.978fps or 29.987fps H.264, 4,000,000 CBR. AVC 192kbps.
OliverNewport 2 years ago
you did an amazing job
ilenses 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
music is wimpy and gay.
yuck.
TheCriticsCritique 2 years ago
People! I have found it.... its called 'sad motive' and its by Spring Waltz...
navalseabass 2 years ago 16
Love this song!
navalseabass 2 years ago 2
what song is it
phobik2000 2 years ago
thanks a lot!
hardtornproductions 2 years ago 2
this is frustrating. i have tried everything to find this music. even shazam didnt work. I NEED THIS SONG!!!
macboy66 2 years ago
FUCKING MUSIC? what is it?
navalseabass 2 years ago
Wow impressive :) good job!
nikolaiownz 2 years ago 2
Nice work!
onagus2008 2 years ago
EPIC WIN!!:)
MehrHeydTV 2 years ago
REALLY nice!
Eraser973 2 years ago 2
Nice job. I'm impressed
BratkoProductions 2 years ago 2
did u have a jib or something cuz i saw the camera floating up!
JavaManEntertainment 2 years ago 2
How did you managed to get 24p in Sony Vegas? Please tell me how to edit my clip like this. Help would be appriciated!
SecretdwarfRS 2 years ago
you would want to get the camera to film in 24 p
88skates88 2 years ago
I'm using a JVC Everio, which is not that advanced. Is there a way to edit the clip so the result will be in 24p?
SecretdwarfRS 2 years ago
haha well im no expert dude and i use sony and canon cameras usually but you will probly wanna go into the menu and usually somewhere in there theres a picture of a tape or it says tape or recording options etc. anyways fiddle around with it and it doesnt need to be EXACTLY 24 p just as long as you can slow down the rate of film hope that helped lol
88skates88 2 years ago
I've got the recording option, what should I do next? I can't 'fiddle' it out, lol. =P
Does this mean that I have to record with my USB cable in the laptop, and walk around with my laptop while recording? Haha, I don't get it. Please explain it more detailed, thanks!
SecretdwarfRS 2 years ago
ooooh i see no no no its not quite like that. 24 p is a measure of the rate of frames per second which the camera films at. Its irrelevant to the computer. for example if you wanted to film something really slow it would probably be filming at a much higher rate of frames per second than the camera in this video, which is filming at 24 p. if you hve trouble you should see if you can find an online manual on google for you camera or something like that. hope this helped
88skates88 2 years ago
yes, I think it's called revers telecine or kinescope which allows you to convert 30fps into 24fps on some non linear editing programs, however I'm not to sure
fredNielssen 2 years ago
is weird, I meant
MOBRIEN1234567 2 years ago
nice. Should freeze last frame then fade to white, the flash then freeze it weird.
MOBRIEN1234567 2 years ago
good question, what piece of music is it? sounds nice...
andremzk 2 years ago
what is the song?
macboy66 2 years ago
how do you make those dark edges on 0:32 ?
Falcata 2 years ago
There's something about it that just isn't convincing as film. I think it's the low dynamic range and the infinitely deep focus of digital. The static shot was the closest, though.
bilbomarks 2 years ago 10
@bilbomarks
If he added some contrast to it but shot with a higher shutter speed, it would more closely resemble the look and jitteriness of film. 1/48 is recommended, but go higher than that and you get more strobe.
donmation 1 year ago
@donmation Slower shutter speed gets you more jitter. Faster is smoother.
bilbomarks 1 year ago
@bilbomarks
You are half right. Let me explain: a higher shutter speed means more of your scene is in focus (assuming you don't zoom). The more you have in focus, the more static each frame looks because you have less motion blur- and more strobe.
You are correct to say that a lower shutter speed than the native frame rate also causes jitter- but this is for a different reason. When you lower the shutter speed too far, you also drop your frame rate because the shutter is closed longer.
donmation 1 year ago
@donmation What? I don't think shutter speed has anything to do with focus at all. That's more the realm of aperture. More open means shallower DOF.
bilbomarks 1 year ago
Comment removed
donmation 1 year ago
@bilbomarks
@bilbomarks
You're still only half right. Yes, an open iris will make the focus shallower, but strobe has everything to do with the staticity and clarity of each frame. The more motion blur you have, the less strobe. The lower the shutter speed, the more motion blur. Depth of field, aperture, and shutter speed are all related to each other.
donmation 1 year ago
@donmation I'm not trying to be right or wrong. I'm trying to figure out what you mean. I've never heard of strobe. Do you mean flicker?
bilbomarks 1 year ago
@bilbomarks
I haven't done live action, but in animation Strobe is another word for flicker. It's usually used to imply jerky movement, while flicker connotes inconsistent exposure levels from one frame to the next. I'm not trying to patronize you, but you're posting inaccuracies and claiming them as fact. Just read what you wrote... Why on earth would a low shutter speed be more jittery? In live action, video has long been considered un-filmlike because of its 1/60th shutter speed.
donmation 1 year ago
The higher your shutter speed, the less the motion blur. Motion blur makes moving objects appear to be smooth because of their lack of spatial definition. Because of persistence of vision, anything in sharp focus moving too fast will jitter because your eyes can not connect up the images as well as they can when it's out of focus. This is basic film theory. I only know it this well because it crosses over into animation. Live action and animation use the same illusion to convey movement.
donmation 1 year ago
@donmation I film often hense my intimate understanding of how s.s and aperture affect the image being reproduced. But I think what we have here is a misunderstanding of terms.Semantics. jittery for example is a subjective term. What it means to you could be completely different from what it means to me. Now I have a camera in my hand right now and around 1/8th S.S. the image starts jumping and seemingly skipping frames. "jittery". You say mine are text book definitions and inaccuracies. What?
bilbomarks 1 year ago
@bilbomarks
Now we're getting somewhere! You are thinking in terms of less than 1/48 of a second. I don't have a DSLR that can shoot video, so I have no experience with that, but the Kodak Zi6 drops its shutter speed in low light, halving the frame rate so what you've said about 1/8 of a second looking stuttery, that makes sense. But considering that a shutter speed that low is not generally used in live action cinematography, except for a certain effect, that's where I got confused.
donmation 1 year ago
@bilbomarks mouvement and some bad choise of plans.
aquadiem 1 year ago
that was very nice. maybe u could get less color and more contrast.
and did u use 24p fps? (that is 23.97 i think) cuz i think that this is something they use in movies.
love it
cankarales 2 years ago
film should have a high dynamic range. adding contrast just does the opposite.
andremzk 2 years ago
yeah maybe but removing contrast would make image too gray so...
let it be that way it is...
cankarales 2 years ago
what Cam did you use?
telnetcarlos 2 years ago
dont like the music
SunnyShawFilms 2 years ago
U dont like the music?? OMG!!! this is perfect! what are u talkin about???
sebasthechecka 2 years ago
What is that piece of music? the piano?
Planetsacramento 2 years ago 2
I think the best way to get the "film look" is to shoot with a bolex H16 (a 16mm camera, $250 off ebay) using 16mm short ends bought from a vendor in hollywood or off ebay ($5/100'). Then get it processed with a student discount, edit it with a film splicer (cement not tape) and telecine (sd with a student discount) That will get you the film look, by shooting on film.
fredNielssen 2 years ago
no shit?!
spongah 2 years ago
But people still want to shoot video and make it look like film, because people have a dilusion that film is too expensive to be lagisticaly possible, but when you are diligent with film, and take the time to research the best deals and shoot short ends/recans/buybacks, you can make a 15min short shot on 2 perf 35mm for $250 more than one shot on a red.
cheaper:
-lighting
-crew (digital tech)
-Set up time (no cables)
-Diligence taught no, 300:1 s-ratio
-camera rentals (2 day week)
fredNielssen 2 years ago 2
Just like in the music world, everything is digital but they try to get the vintage, analog sound.. it's because we want things to look and sound like the stuff we grew up watching, but we want the convenience of digital technology.. actually shooting in film sucks and is hard.. shooting in digital then clicking on the "film look" plugin is way easier.. some day we will want to replicate youtube videos or some stupid shit lol
spongah 2 years ago
What if you want sync sound? What does that do to your 16mm budget?
If you want to do music videos fine, shoot 16mm, but not if you want to do dialogue for a low budget.
TheBloodBeach 2 years ago
thebloodbeach,
I agree, I love shooting 16mm on music videos and on nature documentaries (stuff that normally doesn't require sinc) however, a good CP16r (reflex) camera can be bought for $1000-1750 on ebay, this camera is chrystal sync and is quiet enough to record sync sound (the blair witch project film portion+almost all news pre-digital), another more expensive alternative is the arriflex 16BL ($1750-3000)
This is still cheaper than most video cameras (up front investment)
fredNielssen 2 years ago
hi everyone thats cool ı mean great video looks professionel even though it is home made...bu there is something ı wonder so much. what is the music?who is that playing the piano? is there anyone who knows? please telll us
yukcell1983 2 years ago
Comment removed
yukcell1983 2 years ago
i like the subtle vignette in some of the shots. that skuttling bird on the beach is prime nation geographic shots
motos 2 years ago
how did u do the elevation shot 0:42 using a crane or something? :S
spikytom 2 years ago
the cranes are called jibs
their pretty easy to build and get great shots
napoleontigon2 2 years ago
Of all the Filmlook video yours is the best.
I'll experiment with the following:
Canon HG10 in 24p Cinemode
EnCinema 35mm static dof Adapter
Sony Vegas Pro 8.0
Sony Vegas Color Correction adjustment
Sony Vegas Color Curves adjustment
And of course lighting, lighting, lighting.
Anything missing?
joopdog11 2 years ago
Comment removed
joopdog11 2 years ago
Very nice, actually! I think you could adjust the color curves a bit to make it a LITTLE better, but very nice. How did you do this?
Northkccooker 2 years ago
needs levels adjusted, needs to b more dynamic. and with that kinda music it feels like it should be slowed down. like filmed in 60i and slowed to 23.97. increase the red curve and lower the blue. more contrast. that'll look more like a film then
CrazyFretz 2 years ago
if u think film look is just 2.35:1
yes,u did it
moto4ever 2 years ago 2
woah how did you do the crane shot when the guy was walking away on the beach?
wrenthereaper 3 years ago
its called a camera crane or a camera jib
You can make your own using stuff from home depot or buy one online for 400 bucks...
StinkyCheeser 2 years ago
Very well shot. The saturation control was spot on.
wtfmate09 3 years ago
as small that the image is, soooo grant is the result - wondeful !
phoebus1966 3 years ago
Where do you find this musiiic???
mustang4815162342 3 years ago
great shots , Really impresed :DD:..work a little on the colors... make it a little warmer adding some red :D
DjSamarium 3 years ago
I cannot get that music out of my head! what is it? pls. can someone tell me! i'm going bonkers!
timcabs 3 years ago
i left a video response of one of my videos that is similar to this one...tell me what you think
tastelessbros 3 years ago
cinescope <3
justcauseproductions 3 years ago
What camera was used
WinterParkRide 3 years ago
It's perfect. Can anyone point me in the direction of a tutorial on this?
pattyricks18 3 years ago
Can I also, if possible, i'm using sony vegas 7 with the hv20 as well.
Wun2ThaVisionary 3 years ago
that was rather good i must say
MCSeyWalker 3 years ago
I'd like to see what you could do with a 35mm adapter and some nice audio gear now that you have virtually perfected this.
TravisClearyCC 3 years ago
I have to say I watched all three of your film look tests, which I think were all shot on DV. They all looked phenomenal! The cinematography was most impressive for me. Whoever is cam oping your shots is doing well, and the whoever is designing the shots is equally as good. Closely followed is the post production work. The color correction was superb! I wish I could of heard some of the audio, but I am guessing all you had was the on camera mic. In which case the music was a nice touch.
TravisClearyCC 3 years ago
Awesome work! Inspiring! What is this piece though?
Godlovesyou234 3 years ago
Anybody knows the name of this song? I liked it.
sharquteri 3 years ago 3
What is the music you are using?
asynchronicity 3 years ago 2
Great!!!
leodino000 3 years ago
u can now be a music video director
xxrrxx2002 3 years ago
great!! the leaf in the water, the bird running, the colors..! I can only say GREAT!
tomilbello 3 years ago
How did you do that? You should post a tutorial
AspiringMovieMaker 3 years ago 3
this is natGeo wild !!!
hahahaah ;)
maltijien 3 years ago
Nice job.
cjanhrette 3 years ago
at :40 perfect crane shot + scenery + silence of the waves + timing of the piano + slow emotional feel = best film like scene you can achieve. imo.
CamWa11 3 years ago 5
one of my fav vids. extremely beautiful shooting and footage
musicbybrendan 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
LONG LIVE FILM!!!!
DEATH TO THE DIGI-CHILDREN! SPAWN OF SATAN...ALL OF THEM!
many thanks.
eggbertsmith 3 years ago
perfect. what is the song name for the music?
roaming2 3 years ago 2
calling this beautiful would be a textbook case of understatement.
Every scene had me in awe of what you've achieved.
I mean how did you get the crane effect, with the camera rising into the air? Looked really professional and I'm bending my brain trying to figure out how you did it! lol
Keep it up, my friend.
jazzman7320 3 years ago
a jib
spiffytuxedostudios 3 years ago
hahaha
kchak14 3 years ago
haha i no right, what a dumbass
spiffytuxedostudios 2 years ago
Please could you post camera used, and settings, any lens adapters etc. This footage is spectacular.
mushyosh 3 years ago
attempt successful
truththeseek 3 years ago
this is amazinG!! how did u do this??? if u dont mind sharing
p90p90 3 years ago 2
very nice... is that hawaii?
timefilm 3 years ago
wow!!! great work :O:O wtf this is the best "look-like-movie" i ever seen :D:D
Cr381v3 3 years ago
Good effort fella
nozlrecordingsuk 3 years ago
really great. amazing shots. nicely done. looks like film to me.
jimdevo 3 years ago
i love the cinematography! i feel like watching a european insurance firm commercial, nicely done there!:)
dmitrivalencia 3 years ago
This is youtube, how can you all tell if it looks like film or not?
Depth of feild?
LazersFromJimmy 3 years ago
is it 25p?
miztaz 3 years ago
OMG!!! I LOVE THIS!!!
Pagilas 3 years ago 2
looks really good, wuts up with the letter box though its kinda thick?I see you used the media generator and some color correction.
6543212341 3 years ago
where is this? nice location :)
Maz1989 3 years ago 2
Very film-like, very nice :) What are you doing to the video to get this result? It looks great.
techkrill 3 years ago
i just tweak the colors thats about it. try that and u'll know what i mean
anthonyt87 3 years ago
yup colorista is quite simple
rubent100 3 years ago
Last scene is excellent(was it shot with a crane?). Got the film mood in full. In the earlier scenes a few camera shakes spoof the effect, but quality image is top notch.
hpept 3 years ago
yes you got it!
Vindusmekk 3 years ago
wow a add to my fav.
arealfreak 3 years ago
Did you balance on a light blue card? Because that was my first impression.
Video looks good!
spesqueira73 3 years ago
light blue balance would've made it look warmish. I think its the opposite
Evilstuff 3 years ago
What camera is this man?
Mittelmorder 3 years ago
great job!
humblesnurp 3 years ago
I really liked the crane shot. It really makes it look more professional! Great stuff for DIY.
Thersonlyone 3 years ago
looks like a documentary on the discovery channel. still better quality than most youtube vids.
lilgangsta1224 3 years ago
excellent 5/5
but did correct the colors
pilot7amood 3 years ago
that is totally the east coast of hawaii, nice boom.
gking08 3 years ago
Damn, i've watched the video again.
And i'd swear i was expecting the voiceover of Jeremy Clarkson coming in..
smanettonipuntonet 3 years ago
hahaha thanks ! glad that u like it
anthonyt87 3 years ago
hue color add solid some secrets, its easy
arrozconpollo 3 years ago
looks beautifull dude
MXPXHolland 3 years ago
thank you !!!!
anthonyt87 3 years ago
Beautiful!!
how did u do that? i've been trying to do that for soo long lol.
your really amazing at editing :D
help me if you can :D
hotsizzleakadafizz 3 years ago
colour grading in vegas and output to 24fps thats just about it mate. enjoy
anthonyt87 3 years ago