Added: 1 year ago
From: skipperandcap
Views: 4,379
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (9)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Shadapaga, Yes I did recieve your design images. Thank you for sharing them with me. The fluid "motion" of the forms is like music. When I was a child, My father an electrical engineer, Would let me play with his oscilloscope which graphed electrical sine waves in beautiful flowing patterns. The universe is held together with "music", vibrations. Your designs incorporate the same in three dimentions. Keep creating, make a video of you work! Then buld it.

    Sincerely,

    skipperandcap

  • @skipperandcap thanks man it was cool. i am working with my friend now who is working with cymatics so i kind of saw your music analogy too. I am working on a project you will love.

  • Dear Shadapaga,

    Now , as you have declared to world you ignorance and liberal use of foul language, may you show the people of the Earth your architecture. Are you capable of drawing? I have personally sat down with and discussed Fractal therory with Michael Barnsley, School of Mathmatics Georgia Tech. Morphogenetic theory is akin to fractals, which is the basis of my architecture. Please refrain from imbarassing yourself futher. See "Friends of Kebyar" for some insight.

    Skipperandcap

  • @skipperandcap did you get the work i sent you, it is pretty good work. its not exactly what im trying to explain but it worth seeing.

  • Dear Shadapoga, Intellectual and philosophical debate are a healthy means of furthering and advancing human thought. Your comments suggest you are capable of neither. Why overtly berate organic architecture, which grows from the spirit of mankind and life yet uphold Deleuzin, (spelled capitol "D"), which ignores the soul and places the material world above God? As I see no architecuture of yours and only shallow nonconstructive statements, I suggest you are the "shallow" one.

  • @skipperandcap this architecture sucks its superficial, representational and misses the point of whats beautiful in nature. if you knew dogshit about deleuze or frank lloyd wright you would have never made this video. Naturalism itself is superficial compared to autogenic and morphogenetic architecture which is a neoformal interpretation of natures essence. you need to pay more attention to all 5 senses and the essense of nature and creation before you see that this architecture is cheap.

  • They are just building into the landscape it is philosophically and metaphysically very shallow. The earth is only connected to our consciousness through sensory phenomena and our conscious and subconscious interpretations of that. I developed architectures based on deleuzian materialism where you actually interpret architecture as you would the natural world, the architecture is far far better than this cheap sci-fi idea.

  • Mesmerizing Architecture! Truly a hopeful vision for humanity. I want to experience the "living structure-art". Terra Homage feels as if it is the natural evolution of "Broad Acre City". Does James H. Klippel have a book out on his organic architecture?

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more