Glenn Beck - The Problems With the Montana Gun Law - May 11, 2009

[pitolove71]

Knives are 3 times more used in Britain for murder than guns. What are they going to do know? Ban knifes too. Is every person regulated to a plastic knife & fork? If America bans guns, will we ban knifes next? Look at the UK, a gun ban society. They're experiencing record high knife murders daily.

[Linguiphile]

@Shelbzism Notice how the comments by you Leftists are always so much less intelligent and so ill-informed compared to those by conservatives. Your comment here shows the intolerance and tendency towards hatred and violence that so typify "Progressives" and other Marxists.

I too cringe when Beck talks religion, but he has done a great service in exposing the vast Leftwing conspiracy to turn our country from freedom & prosperity to Communism.

We must restore the Republic and its Constitution!

[Shelbzism]

My opinion of guns would improve if Beck got shot.

[RunsWitGuns]

lock and load boys those fuckin communists are comin

[abukamoon]

You don't need a Constitutional Amendment to overturn a Supreme Court decision. A simple majority in both Houses of Congress can remove the Court's jurisdiction. It is a lot easier to get a majority in both Houses than to amend the Constitution. See Article III, Sections 1 & 2.

[stove6]

This 'law expert' is making too much out of nothing.

He's just speaking nonsense, and planting doubt in the minds of people.

[ZDWmiamicane]

Your wrong, Professor Barnett is a great scholar. Read his book "Restoring The Lost Constitution."

[stove6]

close down every ATF field office in

Montana....

Montana, just make your law, and back it

up with county jurisdictions.

[marcinohio575]

Go Montana! Montana, go tell the feds to go to hell! A++++ Montana, Here I come!

[redneck1036]

not whatever it wants...but you kow what i mean

[redneck1036]

uh....this guy on becks show is dumb...it doenst matter if the supreme court upholds it....the state can do whatever it wants....

[THEGMAN875]

FYI !" federalism is totalitarian " a former head CIA official was a member of the federalist party and its federalism we are experiencing now via the progressive movement and other socialist athourotarian groups

[ontheturn]

god bless glenn beck and alex jones

[Paetaor]

With all those guns around, when things get really bad, people will snap and there is going to be a slaughter.

[peterbob101]

then we should ban all big trucks because when things get really bad, people will snap they could drive it down a city sidewalk and kill hundreds

[tiecuando]

shut up

[spendingyourmoney]

I love me some guns but this cat is right! It sucks but you can't say for sure that a gun won't leave the state! AND if it does pass and a crime is commited with an out of state gun look out! The harder we push the harder they push back!

[apt3444]

You're right. The stakes are really high! The other side gets a pass no matter how many unarmed people are killed in crimes... yet a person who already broke a lot of laws uses a gun, and it paints a huge mark against all the law abiding owners who don't break laws. Unfair to say the least.

[stratvic]

If they used their own cartridge that was only available in the state they could solidify the position that interstate trade was unlikely.

[trainstation21]

the Gun rights issue is more important than the cannabis stuff

[trainstation21]

its about choice, anyone one with a brain who looks at cannabis and says oh no theres really no medical use, is just ignoring commin sense

who many pills are just refined synthatic versions of things found in nature .  90%

[SiY11]

The California cannabis law did not fly with the Supreme Court because no ware in the constitution does it say you can smoke drugs. LoL

[Dt0x75]

@SiY11

Nowhere in the Constitution does it say the Federal Government can tell the states what they can and cannot do. In fact... The states are sovereign under the Constitution. So yes.... If the State wants to make cannabis legal, and/or manufacture weapons the Federal Government made illegal they have that right.

[elijah5791]

So, true. So, true. The Founders were pretty smart guys, huh?

You'd think everyone would be for the idea of Federalism. I mean, think about it; every political faction could create their own little haven within our country. You could have theocratic states, states where gays could marry, states where you could have multiple wives, states where prostitution was legal, states were drugs were legal and others where it was all illegal.

Then, we wouldn't have to fight so much in Congress! :)

[purzheen]

That's what those Southern patriots fought and died for, friend. Sadly, with the triumph of Lincoln's despotic government, there is nothing left of our country. If the remaining Southerners and inter-mountain Westerners could just unite against the Feds, maybe we could be free again. Instead we're fed a bunch of racism-is-the-problem bull$hit while slowly being deprived of all rights. BOTH PARTIES ARE TO BLAME! I just changed to a third party. Let the fight begin.

[Dt0x75]

Yea good analogy also with the Civil War, and now also with the Racism. Just as with the Civil War we are taught that it was the Fed abolishing slavery that started it.(Which is only a small piece of a much broader picture) We are now being force fed this lie that its "racists" or "racism" that leads these Gov protests. Well this has been going on for years, and heated up during Bush. So yes both parties are to blame. Thats why im an Independent i don't trust any of them.