yes the evo won....the honda had no excuses. Evo's are tough to beat because of the traction advantage. There is no horsepower/technological advances at all.
Thats the same 4g63 found in the eclipse. Mitsubishi must learn to progress and create better engines not by putting bigger turbo and cams and calling it a day. 1992 eclipse will run your evo down. being that its awd and can produe the same hp as you while being in a lighter chassis. honda is the most advanced comapny. prove me wrong.
You have no idea what you're talking about. The 4g63 between the 1992 Eclipse and the EVO is almost completely different. The cylinder heads use a fast burn compression chamber, MIVEC (known to you as VTEC) is used, the bottom end is completely different. It uses different pistons, and different rods. The crank is modernized as well. In the head you have sodium filled valves, etc. Revised coolant flow, everything about it is better. The only thing that's the same is 4G63, the engine code.
Hmmm ber nice. Didnt know that. I know that all the parts are interchangeable. The fastest dsm is still a eclipse with the older motor. THUMBS UP though for knowing your stuff
evo won n dat civic got slicks.."SLICKS NOW"..all u honda people bitch about traction..dat civic had slicks n still lost..not that i hate hondas..i hate wen they bitch and cry n think their king of the streets..
first off, its driven, not drove, and secondly, i drove a time attack single turbo crx with a 2.2, it was fast as hell, but he had well over $12,000 invested, and for that price, there is MUCH better and MUCH faster rides he coulda used. the weight was phenomenal, but the power just wasnt that of my buick. my buick absolutely DESTROYS corners, but thats how it was built. all in all, i hate hondas, and thats a matter of personal opinion. slow, horible in winter, no traction, they just fail. IMO
lol.. well you seem to have sum valid points NO... dont you correct my grammar. you mother bitch. heres One more you can use to back your opinion, most of us who have a fast honda, dont have AC or power steering. true story nig.
it makes no sense to even soup up a fwd car. you cant expect a car to plant the power, aswell as turn, and do everything else the front wheels do. its straight up idiocy. its straightline speed, or turning, you cant have both, and if you want both, fwd is the last place to look. hondas are fine stock, its when dumb son of a bitches modift them, that they start to SUCK. why build a TA honda when you could BUY a lotus exige cheaper? its just stupid.
lotus exige lol wow dude you really dont know what your talking about. ya the lotus mite handle better but in a drag race or freeway run you will get raped and you can not by one cheaper than a civic. fully built civic 8,000-10,000 tops thats like half of your lotus your lame get a life.
you apparently don't factor in all of the safety systems, and electrical systems. electrical and safety are alone, about 6K. you have to have a custom turbo setup, thats about 4-6 grand, not to mention all the safety stiffening, also need a nice suspension, and don't get me fucking started on tires. stock axles are good but if you wanna make more than one run, you need custom axles, another $1k for racing rims, Plexiglas windows, and all the fucking carbon fiber. do the math again.
You dont know shit about hondas apparently.you dont need plexiglas windows,cardon fiber.ya if you taking it to the drag strip safety shit.buya roller civic 500-1000,ls motor ship is about 600,b16 head 300,full internals,axles,full racing clutch about 2800-3000,and hondata turbo smart e boost less than 800,and gt35r 1800.thats about 7,500 fool!
evo had nos in it thats why it won . eg would have tooken off on it liike it did in the beginning and even wiith the extra boost the hatch kept up . nos is for pussys straight have confidence in your car pussys
why does the evo backfire while revving it? I cant tell if hes bouncin off the rev limiter or if its some kind of fuel cut, or what. either way, you would think it cant be good for the motor.
just thought id add to this, its ignition cut 2 step, as opposed to the fuel cut 2 step, there is a difference, and yes its bad for the motor, but not as bad as it sounds
wrong. Anti-lag is a setup where the engine intentionally retards ignition between shifts with the valves open to cause a backfire, in turn spooling the turbo. Launch control has a similar (but different) principal in where it retards ignition timing to the point of causing a backfire to spool the turbo, but ONLY ON THE LAUNCH, AND NOT BETWEEN SHIFTS.
I heard someone say the run was like a 13.9.. that had to be for the hatch right? still 13.9 is slow on a hatch with a turbo on slicks.. plus.. what do you expect from an evo N20 on the bottle? this race was dumb
Is this the special olympics?
quadsurvival 2 weeks ago
they should give da chubby guy sum cukiee cukie
JoseEVOix 10 months ago
god damn both of them cars need tuned, i can see both of em needing a rebuild very soon, running WAY to rich.
NissanTy 1 year ago
grafox is right not all 4gs are the same if your honda stick to them but dsm dont compare to type r i give the win for dsm going faster on the track
Emmet3MS 1 year ago
Nice!!
chrisef9 1 year ago
nice cars ! the evo win !
cubanboy585 2 years ago
yes the evo won....the honda had no excuses. Evo's are tough to beat because of the traction advantage. There is no horsepower/technological advances at all.
Thats the same 4g63 found in the eclipse. Mitsubishi must learn to progress and create better engines not by putting bigger turbo and cams and calling it a day. 1992 eclipse will run your evo down. being that its awd and can produe the same hp as you while being in a lighter chassis. honda is the most advanced comapny. prove me wrong.
TempSohc 2 years ago
You have no idea what you're talking about. The 4g63 between the 1992 Eclipse and the EVO is almost completely different. The cylinder heads use a fast burn compression chamber, MIVEC (known to you as VTEC) is used, the bottom end is completely different. It uses different pistons, and different rods. The crank is modernized as well. In the head you have sodium filled valves, etc. Revised coolant flow, everything about it is better. The only thing that's the same is 4G63, the engine code.
danhammans 2 years ago
Hmmm ber nice. Didnt know that. I know that all the parts are interchangeable. The fastest dsm is still a eclipse with the older motor. THUMBS UP though for knowing your stuff
TempSohc 2 years ago
Guess you havent hear of MIVECs...sad of you...
and not all 4g63 engines are all the same...
grayfox13 2 years ago
so basically its a souped up 4g63. I see, its the type R of the dsm's. Smart.
TempSohc 2 years ago
that evo sounds like IRAQ
AccordSkater87 2 years ago
HAHAHAHA AccordSkater87, i dunno why but i laughed pretty hard
cougar10ag 2 years ago
I think that I just blew my speakers...
hondac55 2 years ago 2
evo won n dat civic got slicks.."SLICKS NOW"..all u honda people bitch about traction..dat civic had slicks n still lost..not that i hate hondas..i hate wen they bitch and cry n think their king of the streets..
StR8uP4rmDaBIGiSLaNd 2 years ago
i just dont understand why someone would put $15,000 in a honda even to compete with something with $5000 in it.
step 1, buy rwd.
step 2, wreck honda.
unless you have a s2k, but those are shit anyway ;)
MagicalMrSkylar 2 years ago
have you ever drove a fast honda?
surfnakd23 2 years ago
first off, its driven, not drove, and secondly, i drove a time attack single turbo crx with a 2.2, it was fast as hell, but he had well over $12,000 invested, and for that price, there is MUCH better and MUCH faster rides he coulda used. the weight was phenomenal, but the power just wasnt that of my buick. my buick absolutely DESTROYS corners, but thats how it was built. all in all, i hate hondas, and thats a matter of personal opinion. slow, horible in winter, no traction, they just fail. IMO
MagicalMrSkylar 2 years ago
lol.. well you seem to have sum valid points NO... dont you correct my grammar. you mother bitch. heres One more you can use to back your opinion, most of us who have a fast honda, dont have AC or power steering. true story nig.
surfnakd23 2 years ago
i love how you correct someone for using the wrong past tense for 'drove' and its the first thing you do
Krisspychiken 2 years ago
you drove a time attack just like the guy above you were talking shit about he drove a fast honda haha your lame.
Bigthings559 2 years ago
it makes no sense to even soup up a fwd car. you cant expect a car to plant the power, aswell as turn, and do everything else the front wheels do. its straight up idiocy. its straightline speed, or turning, you cant have both, and if you want both, fwd is the last place to look. hondas are fine stock, its when dumb son of a bitches modift them, that they start to SUCK. why build a TA honda when you could BUY a lotus exige cheaper? its just stupid.
MagicalMrSkylar 2 years ago
So I guess it takes better skilled drivers to drive a modded FWD.
hondaishere 2 years ago
lotus exige lol wow dude you really dont know what your talking about. ya the lotus mite handle better but in a drag race or freeway run you will get raped and you can not by one cheaper than a civic. fully built civic 8,000-10,000 tops thats like half of your lotus your lame get a life.
Bigthings559 2 years ago
you apparently don't factor in all of the safety systems, and electrical systems. electrical and safety are alone, about 6K. you have to have a custom turbo setup, thats about 4-6 grand, not to mention all the safety stiffening, also need a nice suspension, and don't get me fucking started on tires. stock axles are good but if you wanna make more than one run, you need custom axles, another $1k for racing rims, Plexiglas windows, and all the fucking carbon fiber. do the math again.
MagicalMrSkylar 2 years ago
You dont know shit about hondas apparently.you dont need plexiglas windows,cardon fiber.ya if you taking it to the drag strip safety shit.buya roller civic 500-1000,ls motor ship is about 600,b16 head 300,full internals,axles,full racing clutch about 2800-3000,and hondata turbo smart e boost less than 800,and gt35r 1800.thats about 7,500 fool!
Bigthings559 2 years ago
your a fucktard
brayt0n 2 years ago
everyon will take that mitsu over fucking honda anyway fwd is boring and it sucks.....
wisniaPl628 2 years ago 2
damn both are fuckin beasts
Red97Avenger 2 years ago 2
hahahahahahh mitsubeatu!!!!!! stay on ya 2step
sneakerpimpozp 2 years ago
that sounded so sweet lol
jigmastaj2 2 years ago
STFU... EVo won... END OF STORY
SpecVchild 3 years ago
evo had nos in it thats why it won . eg would have tooken off on it liike it did in the beginning and even wiith the extra boost the hatch kept up . nos is for pussys straight have confidence in your car pussys
puertoroc698 3 years ago
p.o.s honda lmfao thats what happens...
joelz1221 3 years ago
de ceebick be jamaican me crazy.
Yamaha262 3 years ago
why does the evo backfire while revving it? I cant tell if hes bouncin off the rev limiter or if its some kind of fuel cut, or what. either way, you would think it cant be good for the motor.
noslow50ford 3 years ago
it's called a 2step lol
professorhor 3 years ago 6
its the 2step
puertoricanEX0 3 years ago
just thought id add to this, its ignition cut 2 step, as opposed to the fuel cut 2 step, there is a difference, and yes its bad for the motor, but not as bad as it sounds
kLOTTiS 3 years ago
ughh guys, all wrong. its called anti-lag.
shadowdreamzk20 2 years ago
wrong. Anti-lag is a setup where the engine intentionally retards ignition between shifts with the valves open to cause a backfire, in turn spooling the turbo. Launch control has a similar (but different) principal in where it retards ignition timing to the point of causing a backfire to spool the turbo, but ONLY ON THE LAUNCH, AND NOT BETWEEN SHIFTS.
QuattroScirocco 2 years ago 2
evo was nasty
marc96accord 3 years ago
honda civic sick evo SICKER AND FASTER with a headstart still set it on himm
nismo413 3 years ago
boomba clot!
85turboS12 3 years ago 4
mo fiya mo fiya bru bru bru!
reqtangle 3 years ago
i wonder wat that even means lol... sounds like a heart disease or sumthin lol
zunetrav4 3 years ago
FIRE BREATHING CIVIC!!!!!
jdm2bboy 3 years ago
thats a nice civic
909Hector 3 years ago
that was a sick ass race
panokio 3 years ago
Evo was a beast.
sKitsOo88 3 years ago
Evo was a beast.
sKitsOo88 3 years ago
evo run he skunt down
killakojak 3 years ago
yo unno a yard man? how u mean show dem seh evo a move out
3star2nr 4 years ago
what does that evo have other than nitrous? tight civic too.
reqtangle 4 years ago
yo dat shit sounded like a war zone
emoney1235 4 years ago
lol
reqtangle 4 years ago
lmao it vietnam all over again
dlee4she 4 years ago
I heard someone say the run was like a 13.9.. that had to be for the hatch right? still 13.9 is slow on a hatch with a turbo on slicks.. plus.. what do you expect from an evo N20 on the bottle? this race was dumb
youngonesunique 4 years ago
yeah the race was dumb i dont think that hatch was that slow tho it has a blown turbo anyway
takata55 4 years ago
fast evo
shadowdreamzk20 4 years ago
God all that popping sounded like shit, ncie Evo though
finkz34 4 years ago
It's called backfire, and you're going to hear it on most serious drag races.
anchoricex 4 years ago
Might it have been an "anti-lag" turbo system? Most rally cars have them.
Prototypexl 3 years ago
It is in the title, Stutterbox, Two Step, Anti Lag it's all the same thing.
Syndrohm 3 years ago
anit-lag is something different. Short explaination is it keeps your turbo spinning when you shift (thus, anti-lag) 2 step is just for launching.
bacononmycereal 3 years ago
EVO HAD EM
R1PTHAJACKER 4 years ago
Top Level Performance is awesome
Kscorcz33 4 years ago