Keith Moon would actually punch Fred Durst in the face if he were still here. Or throw him out of a hotel room window for butchering one of the greatest classic rock songs of all time
Yeah the original's definately better. That "L-I-M-P...discover" nonsense is absolute bollocks... but these here lyrics: "No one knows what its like to be mistreated, to be defeated."... no matter how many times I hear different live/studio versions of the Who doing it I don't find that verse. If Limp Bizkit added that I'll give them credit 'cause I like those lyrics... but yeah, Who all the way on this one.
seriously is that a real question kieth moon had more tallent in his left nut compared to limp biskit!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! thinking other wise is just plain blasphomey!!
Limp Bizkit is nothing close to an artist....Hes just a messenger boy reviving the classics so that their message lives on through our generation is what some of you brainwashed teens would say whove never even heard the original....Or you can look at it my way, Hes a thief douche and how the hell did he end up famous? I can play that song and sing it at the same time and have my own music ive been holding onto for years... Not to mention my lungs belch it out like 5 times better than him live
it's really a stupid question, of course The Who is a million time better in every sense. They're all better musicians, they wrote the song and they play it the way it should be played. Limp-something removed the climax of the song, they should be in jail for doing that.
Limp Bizkit version is way better, old music sucks. HOWEVER, any live music sucks ass compared to studio. Live is poor singing, poor sound dynamics, poor tone, just horrible. All live sucks. Can get so much more feeling from studio instead of live. Sure live is all neato you can see the person, OoOO, big deal, they're just a person. People go ape shit over seeing someone famous, if you idolize famous people, you're a loser. Listen to how shitty Fred sounds in this version.
I'm sorry, but i like LB's version more, maybe because i heard this song with LB first? Who knows(no pun intended)
And i can understand people who say that the whos version is better
BUT i can't understand you guys who say The who's is better JUST because its originally their song. In mankinds history there were always things that were improved ontop of the original. You might like The who and dislike LB but don't use such a reason as "because LB's is just a cover"
The original song is from Townsends rock opera "Lifehouse" and was sung by a thug, a hardman crook. Its about the real person behind the facade. The bridge section is vital to this. The limp version is more about a whiny teenager going on about being mistreated.
common comparing Bizkt And " the who " , shows only one thing that u know shit about rock , so go back to ur punky shit " some pop " might help ..... and leave rock to those "who " appreciate it ...
And all the people who prefer the LB version. You've just told the whole world via you tube that you are an arsehole with no taste. It aint big and it aint cool.
For what possible reason did LB cut the climax of the song? Replace it with some scratching? And they're supposed to be a rock band! Hand in your guitars boys, you have zero credibility.
Limp bizkit don t even perform the best part of the song (the upbeat passionate outburst),so they re not even in the running.They re the wheezing fat kid at the touch line with a slice of orange and a blanket from matron.
I like Limp Bizkits version, but the Whos is defenately better. They could've picked a better who performance for this video, because I like the album version better.
i don't like limp bizkit very much but i think fred's voice suits the cover they did. the who's is obviously superior but i might have like limp bizkit's better then their's if lb had kept the best part of the song in instead of that techno crap.
its not even worth comparing. the who...one of the greatest bands of all time...a pioneer of rock...vs. limp bizkit who is a whiny boy band. WHO WINS! hands down
Good quality video or bad "Limp" does not have the vocal talent or a band that rocks as good as The Who...no contest...the music the lyrics...all made genius by The Who!!!:)
although they left out the best part of the song, I feel that the song overall is better without it TBH. It doesn't fit well- the song is mellow and kind of sad, an upbeat slightly angry part in the middle doesn't feel right.
I do not like that he added "Discover LIMP" in the middle- that ruined it IMO.
There really is no competition, The who is odviously better, they wrote it in the first place. The chours is the best, and roger and pete's voices are much better suited to the song much better, they also put more feeling in the song, and Limp Bizkit took the best part of the song out.
The Limp Bizket studio version is much better. It shows that he really respects the original song. However, the original will probably always be the best.
I think the both versions are good, its better the who version cuz the strong part, like someone already say, if you do a cover dont take off the better part. Only in my opinion Fred have better voice but Roger give to the song angry feeling.
I didn't even bother to listen coz I just happened to see this post on the side bar. If it wasn't for The Who, limpy wouldn't even have a song. The Who 4ever!
th who cause they flow of soft to rock is a great change cause it changes a tempo and holds the exitement and if you do a cover do the whole song dont cut out the best part
That Limp Bizkit even attempted to do this song is shameful and sickening to anyone who truely appreciates what rock is supposed to be......The Who forever!
there are two reasons why i like the Limp Bizkit version more:
1. i really don`t like like how the Who changes the song half way through- from emotional slow ballad to hard rock
2. i really do believe that Freds voice sounds better for this particular song. when Roger sings this song [for me at least] it feels like the Who`s version is the cover :)
don`t get me wrong- i`m not saying that fred is a better singer than Roger, it`s just- in a wierd way Freds voice suits this song better
i meant that in Limp Bizkit version vocals and music holds better together
i`m not usually a fan of cover versions- i did believe that allways the original is better- but in this case actually the cover is better [really rare in music history]
if the cover is better, then it logically should be considered as the superior version- hence the original :D :D :D
that`s why for me the The Who version feels like a cover
this was officially declared the worst cover song of all time by digitaldreamdoor by popular demand. none of there other songs could be considered works of genious either which is why they arent even ranked in the top 1000 artists of all time. oh how sad.
excuse me for my numerous posts but I find It humorous that The Whos live version has 4 times more views then lump of shits version whens it a newer song.
lol 1:40 yells in mike like retard conscience seems to be . who would actually like this terrible band when there are actually good rap rock bands like rage against the machine. really this is possibly the worst live performance of all time and the whos young man blues at leeds is the best.
its so obvious the studio version for limp shitcake is aided by the use of hmm a computer or something like many artists do these days. the whos version is so superior i cant explain.
Don't try to understand :) sorry but you are hopeless case;) even this video with some "battle" is lost in my opinion I said this cover belong to the worst cover songs ever...
Limp Bizkit's version is A LOT better. No offence to The Who, but their singer can't sing for shit, not that Fred Durst is so super talented, but he puts more emotion in the song. To be honest, The Who's behind blue eyes is very gay, homosexual to the bone!!
You are kidding I hope... SHIT... limp bizkit's "behind blue eyes" is the worst cover of song ever!!! you can find it out on some sites if you don't listening it !!! I'm furious how you can write this shit???!!!! MORE emotion??? OMG.... GAY? you asshole!!
I'm sorry, but I really can't understand what's so good about the Who. Besides the fact that it's OLD and therefore automatically good for many people. I will never be able to understand how YOUNG people, born in a different generation, can like music like Queen or this worthless shit. But this is my final word about it, since no person born in the early 90's ever explained to me why they like old and boring music. My apologies again my friend, I wanted to express my anger towards boring music.
lol boring? led zeppelin have more edge then any new band and so do the who. fucking idiots like you honestly disgust me go listen to your top 40 tunes that will be forgoten in a year. its generic bullshit aimed at stupid kids like you. your a disgrace to this hopeless tasteless generation. hope you fell bad now asshole. plus the who are rated 8th most critically acclaimed music artist limp dont even make the list. and it goes to 1000...
How comes people do like classic? That's not a hard question really - people loved this music in those times and do love now, means it's not a "one-week-band" which is popular now and forgotten tomorrow.
lol the who are good because they just are they defined what rock n roll meant and there masterpiece whos next was rated as the 28th best album of all time. and limp bizkit dont even have one album rated heck not even in the top 30. the reason is because no one cares about limp and people still care about the who 44 years later. they rightfully earned the place as 8th most criticaly acclaimed artist and limp bizkit definately deserve the spot of well somewhere behind 1000
OMG, you're just proving that you actually do wank off on Top lists. And then you talk about me being a top 40 listener:) I listen what I really like and not because some faggot said that some band established rock n roll. So please, spare me the rankings and lists you are mentioning all the time. Last but not least, I never mentioned LB being a great band, I like them, but I don't say that their music is something that should be remembered. What I do know is that the Who isn't that great.
one im not telling you to listen to the who you probably wouldnt like it and 2 if you dont like it it doesnt mean they arent a good band. but i guess i can respect your opinion
You're very right in this comment. My opinion doesn't add much to the status a band has. If many consider the Who a great band, then they must have done something great to achieve such acclaim. I don't see this greatness however, it just sounds old and rusty to me. And it's not because ít's old music that i dislike the band, I like some of U2's old songs for example, they don't sound old, but more universal, something for all ages. But I'll take my words back, if you like the Who, so be it then
Your worst nightmare, lol. I don't understand your question my friend, do you want a description of how I look like? Social status? I don't see what this information would add to your life :) And what do you mean with 'don't get fooled again'?
HAHAHAHHAAHA, I'm sorry man, didn't get your point. I don't know these songs since I don't quite like this music. I've listened to 'my generation' and I wasn't impressed. I guess I really can't appreciate this music.
lol your music taste is the same as some kid I know extremely generic loud distorted guitars probably crappy generic bands like rise against and post grunge. look you were raised on the radio im guessing and dont know shit about real music grow up. maybe when your older youll look back at what a stupid little kid you really were.
Townshend, Daltrey, Moon and Entwistle eat limp biskit's weak sauce and their retarded band name for breakfast every day. They don't enjoy it, because it tastes bloody awful, but they nonetheless derive satisfaction from their vast superiority and ability to literally consume Fred Durst's inferior, shit-tasting essence. No comparison or competition whatsoever.
Is this even a serious question? The Who pwns limp bizkit to the point where I feel sorry for them! They made complete arses of themselves trying to cover one of the most legendary songs of all time.
how can you even fucking compare the two!!! halfway through the who version, it erupts and melts your face, then there's the limp bizkit version which spells out "I-A-M-G-A-Y". even this version with kenney jones from the 80's blows limp dickshit out of the water. the who pioneered rock n roll for cryin out loud
Keith Moon would actually punch Fred Durst in the face if he were still here. Or throw him out of a hotel room window for butchering one of the greatest classic rock songs of all time
TheAdam159 3 months ago
Um let me think for one nanosecond... The Who! Seriously, who could vote for Limp Bizkit with a straight face?
TheAdam159 3 months ago
"watch?v=zQ2BZ_sJjc0&feature=channel_video_title"
TheTryHards1 8 months ago
Okay, this guy can't sing (LIMP) The Who can kick this guy's A**.
Shep9250 9 months ago
Limp Biskit
1995coolkid1995 11 months ago
Yeah the original's definately better. That "L-I-M-P...discover" nonsense is absolute bollocks... but these here lyrics: "No one knows what its like to be mistreated, to be defeated."... no matter how many times I hear different live/studio versions of the Who doing it I don't find that verse. If Limp Bizkit added that I'll give them credit 'cause I like those lyrics... but yeah, Who all the way on this one.
MegaMcClarey 11 months ago
Why does this guy even have a band?
madman3737 11 months ago
seriously is that a real question kieth moon had more tallent in his left nut compared to limp biskit!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! thinking other wise is just plain blasphomey!!
ConquerTHEgreat221 11 months ago
you spelled limp bizkit wrong man
Mariobizkit 1 year ago
Limp Bizkit is nothing close to an artist....Hes just a messenger boy reviving the classics so that their message lives on through our generation is what some of you brainwashed teens would say whove never even heard the original....Or you can look at it my way, Hes a thief douche and how the hell did he end up famous? I can play that song and sing it at the same time and have my own music ive been holding onto for years... Not to mention my lungs belch it out like 5 times better than him live
MiKEY83091 1 year ago
it's really a stupid question, of course The Who is a million time better in every sense. They're all better musicians, they wrote the song and they play it the way it should be played. Limp-something removed the climax of the song, they should be in jail for doing that.
sergiomng 1 year ago
Limp Bizkit version is way better, old music sucks. HOWEVER, any live music sucks ass compared to studio. Live is poor singing, poor sound dynamics, poor tone, just horrible. All live sucks. Can get so much more feeling from studio instead of live. Sure live is all neato you can see the person, OoOO, big deal, they're just a person. People go ape shit over seeing someone famous, if you idolize famous people, you're a loser. Listen to how shitty Fred sounds in this version.
TheDeathtwinkie 1 year ago
@TheDeathtwinkie dude, everything you said just went against my belief of good music, i hate you lol
GeddyxFlea 1 year ago
@TheDeathtwinkie I almost fell out of my chair cause you rant about shit like I do... Good stuff man
MiKEY83091 1 year ago
@TheDeathtwinkie dude music is ALL about live !!!
Corey91666 11 months ago
Is bad to be Batman.
nacho27coa 1 year ago
the who
345allie345 1 year ago
I'm sorry, but i like LB's version more, maybe because i heard this song with LB first? Who knows(no pun intended)
And i can understand people who say that the whos version is better
BUT i can't understand you guys who say The who's is better JUST because its originally their song. In mankinds history there were always things that were improved ontop of the original. You might like The who and dislike LB but don't use such a reason as "because LB's is just a cover"
Kibate 1 year ago
The original song is from Townsends rock opera "Lifehouse" and was sung by a thug, a hardman crook. Its about the real person behind the facade. The bridge section is vital to this. The limp version is more about a whiny teenager going on about being mistreated.
SvenTviking 1 year ago
You need to find a vid with Keith Moon drumming instead of Kenny Jones.
SvenTviking 1 year ago
THE WHO THEY WROTE THE SONG WITHOUT THAT SONG LIMP BIZKIT WOULD HAVE JUST DO ANOTHER RAP SONG
mariopainthero11 1 year ago
comparing a shit band to gods (limp bizkit the shit band the who the gods) is like comparing a prius to a ferrari
atgskater14 1 year ago
common comparing Bizkt And " the who " , shows only one thing that u know shit about rock , so go back to ur punky shit " some pop " might help ..... and leave rock to those "who " appreciate it ...
RubDonor 1 year ago
The Who all the way
1862727 1 year ago
There's not even a comparation without the who wouldn't be a cover simple as that!
lestat047 1 year ago
And all the people who prefer the LB version. You've just told the whole world via you tube that you are an arsehole with no taste. It aint big and it aint cool.
SvenTviking 1 year ago
For what possible reason did LB cut the climax of the song? Replace it with some scratching? And they're supposed to be a rock band! Hand in your guitars boys, you have zero credibility.
SvenTviking 1 year ago
The Who
VanRaul1989 1 year ago
are you kidding? The Who is much better.
Astn42 1 year ago
Kinda unfiar to complain live performances since The Who is generally regarded as the best live band ever.
bwc3821 1 year ago
quien es limp bizquit?
chambermx 1 year ago
They could have chosen alot better of a video for limp and In my opinion there better
ackerman66 1 year ago
Limp bizkit don t even perform the best part of the song (the upbeat passionate outburst),so they re not even in the running.They re the wheezing fat kid at the touch line with a slice of orange and a blanket from matron.
GILLYRUTH 1 year ago
The Who gets my vote everytime on this song..
DarkCrystal1329 1 year ago
The Who. Fred Durst and the rest of Limb Bizkit ain't got nothing on The Who.
CassaStarfire 1 year ago
Limp is gash... even if the sound was good quality, it would still be gash. The Who rock like no others, simple as...
Stones1664 1 year ago
its not even a contest for me. the who kicks limpbizkits ass
MrMarkfoster 1 year ago
I like Limp Bizkits version, but the Whos is defenately better. They could've picked a better who performance for this video, because I like the album version better.
xXxGODSMACKxXx 1 year ago
whi LB dosnt sing the rest of the song?
spiloFTW 1 year ago
my oppinion limp
steinar553 1 year ago
the who!
who else? ;-)
I like that Song.
It gives me goosebumps...
SuperBalders 1 year ago
While I would definitely prefer The Who, it's fair to point out that the venue for Limp Bizkit wasn't as ameliorative to the sound.
tmhurley27 1 year ago
la cancion es the who no hay vs ganaria la de who mil veces
theanimalseric 1 year ago
Jeeah u understand music
THE WHO 4 LIVE
Mplaylistman 1 year ago
you should take the studio versions
then you can ask who is better
haha who is better who " the who" you know :D
kriegstnenkeks 1 year ago
THE WHO IS BETTER THAN LIMP BISKIT
Todosobrelosbeatles 2 years ago
THE WHO RULES !! it's their song afterall...
keaneoRX7 2 years ago 2
i don't like limp bizkit very much but i think fred's voice suits the cover they did. the who's is obviously superior but i might have like limp bizkit's better then their's if lb had kept the best part of the song in instead of that techno crap.
the who > limp bizkit
TheFallen7fold 2 years ago 2
fred durst: one of the worst things to happen to music
SOADMETALLICA323 2 years ago 4
the who make limp bisket look like it was there first gig while the WHO rock
tony671 2 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Limp bizkit!
fettenachtigall 2 years ago
@fettenachtigall fuck limp bizkit!!!!!!
scarroll66 2 years ago 4
are u jokein limp biskit v the who who in ten yrs are going to remeber lb the who will live forever
tony671 2 years ago 2
finally somebody who can understand music
susunek 2 years ago
the who will live forever, led zep will live forever. nirvana will live forever. no-one undertands that
hughloiterton 2 years ago
The vocals of Daltry far outshine Limp Biskit. But credit where its due, a good cover and it gets the younger generation finding out who the Who are!
amyers708 2 years ago
no shit the whos is better its there song but limp biscut did good covering it
OpenRain1 2 years ago
I would something betwen both... Voice is better in LB and guitar in the who...:)
liskamatej 2 years ago
Both. The Who made a great song and Limp Bizkit did a good job covering it
rabbittale13 2 years ago
its not even worth comparing. the who...one of the greatest bands of all time...a pioneer of rock...vs. limp bizkit who is a whiny boy band. WHO WINS! hands down
dummydave1357 2 years ago 5
limp Bizkit sucks! The who rules!!!
Guitarero1000 2 years ago 7
The Who Bonehead... DUH
coolwrench39 2 years ago 2
The Who!!!!
Tempest290684 2 years ago 6
THE WHO DEFINETLY
hippiechild100 2 years ago 16
The Who are so much better!
emoi1334 2 years ago 22
Good quality video or bad "Limp" does not have the vocal talent or a band that rocks as good as The Who...no contest...the music the lyrics...all made genius by The Who!!!:)
Wolf3d413 2 years ago 4
Okay let's see... The who gets the +1 for the orginal.... Limp gets the +1 for the cover (I think it's still good)...
But a FAT -1 for ronzococo: Picking a bad quality (homemade??) video of Fred Durst and comparing that to a GOOD Q version of the who...
still love em both
TobiasReaper100 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
limp bizkit*
c8tpr 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Respect for writing this song but Limp Bizkit are much BETTER than the who
jenniRAWRcorexD 2 years ago
got to b the WHO, [who are limp bizkit]
wilkinsonroy 2 years ago 5
No contest, The Who ! yank pretend band 0
martyn12d 2 years ago 4
The Who!!!!!!!! much better!!!!!!!
vianashe 2 years ago 4
fuck off limp biskit!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Raphii3494 2 years ago 3
I respect the Who for writing the song and making i tm but Limp Bizkits is just so much better.
doobiemcdildo 2 years ago
The Who!!! that's obvious, limp bizkit it's a fucking rapper....
FRocker93 2 years ago
The Who!! They made the original song and, for me, his version is better, it's an opinion... ;)
7innocentminds 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
T H E W H O~~!!!
zENkiNoMOREPLZ 2 years ago
Limp Bizkit live is terrible 0o
Wertufri 2 years ago
come on !!! the song is great and i don't care who sings it!!!
TheElmatador95 2 years ago
Limp Bizkit ! <3
MaleeGirl 2 years ago
its a fucking who song youcant beat the fucking who
theByrdsfan1 2 years ago
The Who owns everybody. Simple as that.
vjfperez 2 years ago
i prefer L I M P B I Z K I T
mauritzio10 2 years ago
well then your a fucking moron
theByrdsfan1 2 years ago
Is there any comparison needed??
Fred left out the hardest part of the song to sing, the easiest part was bad enough.
kaptankanga 2 years ago
although they left out the best part of the song, I feel that the song overall is better without it TBH. It doesn't fit well- the song is mellow and kind of sad, an upbeat slightly angry part in the middle doesn't feel right.
I do not like that he added "Discover LIMP" in the middle- that ruined it IMO.
silachan 2 years ago
There really is no competition, The who is odviously better, they wrote it in the first place. The chours is the best, and roger and pete's voices are much better suited to the song much better, they also put more feeling in the song, and Limp Bizkit took the best part of the song out.
Patzeppelin69 2 years ago 2
The Limp Bizket studio version is much better. It shows that he really respects the original song. However, the original will probably always be the best.
Flamboyant8 2 years ago
Limp Bizkit isn't a serious band is it?
ChickenPissInTheRoad 2 years ago
I think the both versions are good, its better the who version cuz the strong part, like someone already say, if you do a cover dont take off the better part. Only in my opinion Fred have better voice but Roger give to the song angry feeling.
Pegazo1000 2 years ago 2
THE WHO!
caraiopqp 2 years ago
THE WHOOOOOOOOO!
caraiopqp 2 years ago
are you seriously asking that question? obviously the who did 100000000 times better.. including creating the god damn song. Fuck limp b.
cole8353 2 years ago 5
Oh god... This is so bad.
DarkSamuraiOblivion 2 years ago
I love karoke night!!! Limp Bizkit rules the karoke circut!!!
Boy, did they get smoked...
smiley530 2 years ago
DIE HARD WHO FANS UNITE!
DrBuggles1 2 years ago
Comment removed
DarkSamuraiOblivion 2 years ago
UNITE!
DarkSamuraiOblivion 2 years ago
Dyslexic Who fan UNTIE!!!!11!!11!!!!!1!1!!!1111
homicidalgecko 2 years ago
Who's Limp biskit????????
hahahahahahahahahaha
THE WHO
ngerAKAjonny 2 years ago 5
There is only one version...
There is only one song...
There is only one band...
There is only THE WHO!!!
CleatusKasadyIII 2 years ago 7
I didn't even bother to listen coz I just happened to see this post on the side bar. If it wasn't for The Who, limpy wouldn't even have a song. The Who 4ever!
pinkfreud62 2 years ago 4
what do you want?
mariushana 2 years ago
thewhothewhothewhothewhothewhothewhothewhothewhothewhothewhothewhothewhothewhothewhothewhothewhothewhothewhothewhothewhothewhothewhothewhothewhothewhothewhothewhothewhothewhothewhothewhothewhothewhothewhothewhothewhothewhothewhothewhothewhothewhothewhothewhothewhothewhothewhothewhothewhothewhothewhothewhothewhothewhothewhothewhothewhothewhothewhothewhothewhothewhothewhothewhothewhothewhothewhothewhothewhothewhothewhothewhothewhothewhothewhothewhothewhothewhothewhothewhothewhothewhothewhothewho
lb11lb18 2 years ago 3
so, so right!
DrBuggles1 2 years ago
the who limp biskit is ok but the who rulzzzzzzz :)
Seifersdream 2 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I like Limp Biskit better...
motofox37 2 years ago
the who the who and the who
thebhutjolokia 2 years ago 3
i fucking hate limp shitdick
123123GIR123123 2 years ago 3
why do you watch their vids then ? idiot
mariushana 2 years ago
you really cant compare the qalitys are too far from each other in equality, both artists do stunning versions of the song
airhike 2 years ago 2
Limp Bizkit ? Wtf is this ?
The who rules men !!
BEHIND BLUE EYES
vladmalhou 2 years ago
th who cause they flow of soft to rock is a great change cause it changes a tempo and holds the exitement and if you do a cover do the whole song dont cut out the best part
AZnotCali88 2 years ago
The Who are stll the BEST !
kokoxp1968 2 years ago 2
Yeah, who the fuck is Limp Bizkit?
The Who rulez!
heartfeeder 2 years ago 4
That Limp Bizkit even attempted to do this song is shameful and sickening to anyone who truely appreciates what rock is supposed to be......The Who forever!
greenman1380 2 years ago 3
The who!!... OLD SCHOOL ... fuck limp "biscuit"
Kasegami 2 years ago
Limp Bizkit! Although, obviously the author of this video is biased towards The Who. Cause sound quality for Limp Bizkit version is worse.
vololoo 2 years ago
THE WHO!
enlightening 2 years ago
there are two reasons why i like the Limp Bizkit version more:
1. i really don`t like like how the Who changes the song half way through- from emotional slow ballad to hard rock
2. i really do believe that Freds voice sounds better for this particular song. when Roger sings this song [for me at least] it feels like the Who`s version is the cover :)
don`t get me wrong- i`m not saying that fred is a better singer than Roger, it`s just- in a wierd way Freds voice suits this song better
shwerns 2 years ago
How does something feel like a cover, if could elaborate on that a would appreciate it.
ReggieWinsor 2 years ago
i meant that in Limp Bizkit version vocals and music holds better together
i`m not usually a fan of cover versions- i did believe that allways the original is better- but in this case actually the cover is better [really rare in music history]
if the cover is better, then it logically should be considered as the superior version- hence the original :D :D :D
that`s why for me the The Who version feels like a cover
remember- this is only my opinion ;)
shwerns 2 years ago
THE WHOOOOOO. sb stop that guy
uppetshow 2 years ago 2
THE WHO
inthemax20 2 years ago 3
I like the who better personally.. but that's just me, I think the other was good too. The Who's music was more interesting.
bassplayinscubadiver 2 years ago 2
its limp bizkit fucker!
CrayonPhysiks 2 years ago
Comment removed
demonpuppy101 2 years ago
Comment removed
demonpuppy101 2 years ago
Comment removed
demonpuppy101 2 years ago
Comment removed
demonpuppy101 2 years ago
i like limp bizkit better his voice is more steady more smooth
demonpuppy101 2 years ago
his voice is not better nor does even come close to Roger Daltrey
litledevel15 2 years ago
dude fucking chill all he did was say his opinion
indestructable20 2 years ago
fred sounded like crap live cuz he was probably drunk..the CD version of Limps is pretty good, but nobody is better than the who
cowboyzsuk81 2 years ago
i agree
indestructable20 2 years ago
the who for ever
baboudu16 2 years ago
The Who of course
magnificboy25 2 years ago
The Who of course. Their live show trumps Bizkit's, as well as their respective album versions. The Who wins, hands down.
raggler312 2 years ago
limp bisq shit
tjoepatjoep 2 years ago
The Who of course.
dacoelec 2 years ago 2
The Who, EPIC WIN!
My god, like, 1:40 - 1:55. Horribly out of tune. Epic fail. EPIC
Monsgoose 2 years ago 2
THE WHO limp biscuit r gay
00ThePolice00 2 years ago
this was officially declared the worst cover song of all time by digitaldreamdoor by popular demand. none of there other songs could be considered works of genious either which is why they arent even ranked in the top 1000 artists of all time. oh how sad.
colt45zzx 2 years ago
wow. Bizkit got pwn3d, by his own suckage. Notice, his timing was off on a few parts, too.
asadius 2 years ago 2
excuse me for my numerous posts but I find It humorous that The Whos live version has 4 times more views then lump of shits version whens it a newer song.
colt45zzx 2 years ago
lol 1:40 yells in mike like retard conscience seems to be . who would actually like this terrible band when there are actually good rap rock bands like rage against the machine. really this is possibly the worst live performance of all time and the whos young man blues at leeds is the best.
colt45zzx 2 years ago
wow nice crowd limp bizshit there in someones fucking backyard
colt45zzx 2 years ago
its so obvious the studio version for limp shitcake is aided by the use of hmm a computer or something like many artists do these days. the whos version is so superior i cant explain.
colt45zzx 2 years ago
Don't try to understand :) sorry but you are hopeless case;) even this video with some "battle" is lost in my opinion I said this cover belong to the worst cover songs ever...
luckygayextraaaa 2 years ago
Limp Bizkit's version is A LOT better. No offence to The Who, but their singer can't sing for shit, not that Fred Durst is so super talented, but he puts more emotion in the song. To be honest, The Who's behind blue eyes is very gay, homosexual to the bone!!
Luxifer0000 2 years ago
You are kidding I hope... SHIT... limp bizkit's "behind blue eyes" is the worst cover of song ever!!! you can find it out on some sites if you don't listening it !!! I'm furious how you can write this shit???!!!! MORE emotion??? OMG.... GAY? you asshole!!
luckygayextraaaa 2 years ago
I'm sorry, but I really can't understand what's so good about the Who. Besides the fact that it's OLD and therefore automatically good for many people. I will never be able to understand how YOUNG people, born in a different generation, can like music like Queen or this worthless shit. But this is my final word about it, since no person born in the early 90's ever explained to me why they like old and boring music. My apologies again my friend, I wanted to express my anger towards boring music.
Luxifer0000 2 years ago
lol boring? led zeppelin have more edge then any new band and so do the who. fucking idiots like you honestly disgust me go listen to your top 40 tunes that will be forgoten in a year. its generic bullshit aimed at stupid kids like you. your a disgrace to this hopeless tasteless generation. hope you fell bad now asshole. plus the who are rated 8th most critically acclaimed music artist limp dont even make the list. and it goes to 1000...
colt45zzx 2 years ago
How comes people do like classic? That's not a hard question really - people loved this music in those times and do love now, means it's not a "one-week-band" which is popular now and forgotten tomorrow.
Krasty666 2 years ago
lol the who are good because they just are they defined what rock n roll meant and there masterpiece whos next was rated as the 28th best album of all time. and limp bizkit dont even have one album rated heck not even in the top 30. the reason is because no one cares about limp and people still care about the who 44 years later. they rightfully earned the place as 8th most criticaly acclaimed artist and limp bizkit definately deserve the spot of well somewhere behind 1000
colt45zzx 2 years ago 2
OMG, you're just proving that you actually do wank off on Top lists. And then you talk about me being a top 40 listener:) I listen what I really like and not because some faggot said that some band established rock n roll. So please, spare me the rankings and lists you are mentioning all the time. Last but not least, I never mentioned LB being a great band, I like them, but I don't say that their music is something that should be remembered. What I do know is that the Who isn't that great.
Luxifer0000 2 years ago
lol these are critics lists not top 40 hits lists spare yourself youve heard one who song. really theyre quite a legendary band
colt45zzx 2 years ago
one im not telling you to listen to the who you probably wouldnt like it and 2 if you dont like it it doesnt mean they arent a good band. but i guess i can respect your opinion
colt45zzx 2 years ago
You're very right in this comment. My opinion doesn't add much to the status a band has. If many consider the Who a great band, then they must have done something great to achieve such acclaim. I don't see this greatness however, it just sounds old and rusty to me. And it's not because ít's old music that i dislike the band, I like some of U2's old songs for example, they don't sound old, but more universal, something for all ages. But I'll take my words back, if you like the Who, so be it then
Luxifer0000 2 years ago
The Who are an old band. They are just acclaimed by all generations. Like, say, my generation. Because, y'a know, we don't get fooled again.
But really, who are you?
Monsgoose 2 years ago
Your worst nightmare, lol. I don't understand your question my friend, do you want a description of how I look like? Social status? I don't see what this information would add to your life :) And what do you mean with 'don't get fooled again'?
Luxifer0000 2 years ago
Oh. My. God. I just quoted... 3 Who songs, and you got none of the references.
"My Generation"
"We don't get fooled again"
"Who are you?"
Monsgoose 2 years ago
HAHAHAHHAAHA, I'm sorry man, didn't get your point. I don't know these songs since I don't quite like this music. I've listened to 'my generation' and I wasn't impressed. I guess I really can't appreciate this music.
Luxifer0000 2 years ago
Comment removed
demonpuppy101 2 years ago
lol your music taste is the same as some kid I know extremely generic loud distorted guitars probably crappy generic bands like rise against and post grunge. look you were raised on the radio im guessing and dont know shit about real music grow up. maybe when your older youll look back at what a stupid little kid you really were.
colt45zzx 2 years ago
Townshend, Daltrey, Moon and Entwistle eat limp biskit's weak sauce and their retarded band name for breakfast every day. They don't enjoy it, because it tastes bloody awful, but they nonetheless derive satisfaction from their vast superiority and ability to literally consume Fred Durst's inferior, shit-tasting essence. No comparison or competition whatsoever.
TheMiddleEightJFWB 2 years ago
limp is an appropriate verb, any one of the who had more talent and ability than the whole of limp biscuit...
abolof 2 years ago
Is this even a serious question? The Who pwns limp bizkit to the point where I feel sorry for them! They made complete arses of themselves trying to cover one of the most legendary songs of all time.
braino2000 2 years ago
how can you even fucking compare the two!!! halfway through the who version, it erupts and melts your face, then there's the limp bizkit version which spells out "I-A-M-G-A-Y". even this version with kenney jones from the 80's blows limp dickshit out of the water. the who pioneered rock n roll for cryin out loud
ManiacDrummer1212 2 years ago
limp bizkuit suck, the who made bands like limp bizkuit
theboywhocantollie 2 years ago 2
Oh, and by the way.
The hard Rockband didn´t played the hard part???
Wankers
BND999 2 years ago
Please, can someone shoot Fred Durst.
BND999 2 years ago 2