TrueMajority Nuclear BB Demonstration

[mund0g]

Reptilian humanoids have been mating with political leaders for decades and now aliens are living among us and we don't even know it

[dogfight156]

i had no idea. thank you for sharing this.

[patginsd]

You know why they do it right?

This creates the multi-billionaire CEO's with their inflated egos, never-ending greed, inflated bonuses, Golden parachute retirements, gaudy entertainment, villas, etc. while you and I have our schools, teachers, children, fellow citizens go further and further down the hole to oblivion.

[vvin732]

the total number of nuclear warheads in the world is well over 23,000, each one of them hundreds, or thousands of times powerful than hiroshima bombs

if you are saying these information are inaccurate, yes, inaccurate as in understated,

Go Check with FAS report if you are unconvinced, but i doubt if u even know what FAS is

[jjg195]

Cuz Knowlege Is Power :D!!!!

[macakRep]

...what leaves me perplex is that... they don't even need 1% of what they posess in nuclear weapons to annihilate the whole world...well Earth.

I mean, they drop 2 bombs and they can destroy a whole country ... are they going to drop 2000 more at the same place just to be sure whoever they dropped the bomb on are dead?...

[CrazyIemon]

Nukes can be shot down. Ten bombs may be needed to destroy a country, but only one bomb out of like 100 will make it to their target. That's the logic behind having so mahy

[BCIORevolution]

The nukes america currently has cannot be shot down (not sure about Russia but i'm sure it's the same). The ICBM (intercontinental ballistic missile) goes into the outer atmosphere to directly over it's destination and plummets to earth over it's target. Making it impossible to "shoot it down". And as for stopping it while its taking off, it's like finding a needle in a haystack. the logic of having more nukes is who has the biggest pecker. Which is the reason behind the "STAR Treaty" google it

[17Thann]

@CrazyIemon It's more like they might destroy 99 bombs that are never launched/dropped and we only have 1 to retaliate with. Shooting them down is damn near impossible, the US still hasn't done it consistently in testing situations... Which are significantly more ideal than a real world scenario.

[IaoGawd]

All our modern technology... and this is what we do we the gift of knowledge.

Maybe we could start a recycling program to process them all into civiilian nuclear fuel?

[CrazyIemon]

We need 'em in case aliens attack

[acerguido]

Naja a another civilication comes to us to kill us??? I dont think an alien makes that but so many Bombs are exaggerated.

Switzerland hvent got a Atom bomb.

ok they are loosers with the military.

[so0exquisite]

rosebgvfc

[dellsprospects22]

since i read the leach paulson only gave half the money to banks and they're not even helping homeowners i'm enraged..i'm against the bailout to begin with but we've got to stop him..i saw bush try to force the banks to start giving loans now and i can't believe the banks aren't doing it..what next?

[Regenesis08]

ironicly,the nuclear bombs maintained the peace up until now,because if nuclear bombs wouldnt have existed,then peoples will start wars without being afraid they will all die.

[bbraswe2]

All of them? We need all of them?!

[S116103500]

Yes, nuclear weapons were "needed" to prevent one side from destroying the other, but the amount we had is simply overwhelming. If we used all of them, we could literally blow the planet into pieces.

[dellsprospects22]

no all the planets

[chantalbernard]

yuck.

[PhilintheBlank1]

Nuclear bombs spoil everything. You can't have an all out war when both sides can push the 'off' button.

[broccoli5752]

read Tom Clancy's end war, or his red storm rising. In the story Russia gave up instead of using nukes

[CommanderUTube]

Some people are getting mighty rich for the continuation of this dangerous craze.

Some day, the earth will look like Mars with its atmosphere gone and cratered to kingdom come. We have yet to know for sure if the southern hemisphere of Mar were mainly cratered by a long gone advanced civilization that did themselves in with massive mutual annihination and WMDs.

[SilentBob420BMFJ]

please tell me what good all those weapons will do.. you need about 100 nuclear bombs at most, because if you are using more than that, you are now involved in ww3, in which case who cares, we are all dead

[gaararox13]

wow thats alot

[neurochem]

I am always amazed when I read people's comments supporting massive nuclear stockpiles, or weapons in general, because they are usually coming from the conservative, religious dogmatists (i.e. Right-Wing Christians). Didn't their savior claim that those who live by the sword shall die by the sword (Matthew 26:52)? Of course, if you are referring to the Old Testament then there are no contradictions; however, they claim to only follow the New Testament, so, again, why do they support WMDs?

[fleming1972]

What would be the practical benefit of using our nuclear bombs anyway? Let's say worst case, we get nuked. What benefit is there of us nuking back and killing just as many innocent civilians? Maybe someone can explain it to me. Maybe I'm stupid.

[SilentBob420BMFJ]

because the entire point of war is to protect your citizens and at the same time do as much damage to the other country as possible, and by damage, i mean make them really pissed off and sign a treaty.. if we could nuke all non innocents, we would, but thats not really possible.. it would take a large group of crazy navy seal types and assassins to take out only people we wanted, but even then they would say ok you want to take out 100 of our top guys? how about we bomb entire cities of yours?

[fleming1972]

I don't want people to bomb my city. People in other countries don't want us to bomb them either. Life is simpler than people make it out to be.

[SilentBob420BMFJ]

ok well you call all the different countries that have weapons and let them know you have the solution, and tell them what it is

[AutomaticAsian]

watch?v=1UEOZGFzPas

[dcperera]

Hiroshima bomb=15 kilotons

15 kilotons exposes only 3.7sq miles to 5 psi overpressure and 5 psi is about the outer limit of bringing a house down let alone a bigger building.

90x15kt=333.23 sq miles (I'd hardly call that all of Russia in fact Moscow is 417.4 sq mi according to wikipedia).

According to the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists the U.S. currently fields 1,766,400 total kilotons on 10 different weapon systems. I hope this helps people argue.

[dcperera]

ps: 150,000 times Hiroshima's yield would be 2,250,000 kilotons.

[saadasim]

Down with excessive nuclear weapons!

Up with quality ice cream!

[jailarson]

I'll bring the cake!

[Zacloud]

Everyone should only have anti-missiles, not nukes. That way everyone's defended, nobody's offensive. And if someone DID hide and launch a nuke, it'll be shot down, followed by global retaliation and a sound trouncing. Nobody threatening to anyone, a nice defense grid for everyone in the off chance someone is.

[BeondaPale]

Yeah, but if we only had enough to defend ourselves, how would the military industrial complex that has corrupted our democracy and sovereignty make money?

[EmmaCharlotteStubbs]

it's THEIR system..let's keep out of their way..they're INSANE..they've told us in their own books what they're going to do to us! time soon to unplug from the grid and learn to live natural lives: the cities are prisons - they're dead serious about depopulation y'know and have all the deadly viruses ready to go when the time is right/They own all the resources & regard the planet as their own & most of us as useless eaters: we're obsolete - telling your congressman won't do a blind bit of good

[ironwolfosiris]

It makes me sick how we keep these unnecessary weapons intact.

[ImTedBell]

They are a deterrent.

If nukes make you sick, you should probably get out more.

[AdvocacyCorporation]

How can 10,000 nuclear bombs rationally be a deterrent? Just keep as many as needed to blow up the world 1 time over. :)

Watch the Fog of War and see how close we actually came to USING them - because our technology has exceeded our humanity.

We SHOOT NUCLEAR WASTE AT PEOPLE - it's called Depleted Uranium or DU - can you justify that too?

[AdvocacyCorporation]

Correction 150,000 nuclear missiles (each BB represents 15 Hiroshima sized bombs)

Einstein said it best:

"Our technology has exceeded our humanity"

The problems of this world are not technological ones - they are problems because we choose economy/technology over humanity instead of making it SERVE humanity. The ENDS DO NOT JUSTIFY THE MEANS.

This creates a world where ANYTHING goes - ANYTHING is acceptable under ANY circumstance.  Sound familiar?

Watch Idiocracy this film nails it

[ImTedBell]

Lets try to deal in fact here and not scaremongering BS like you are trying to put forth.

The U.S. DOES NOT HAVE 150,000 nuclear missiles.

The BB's represented 15 Hiroshima SIZED bombs, meaning the yield from 15 of those bombs.

Nuclear Yield is significantly higher today than it was back then, in fact one missle could yield exponentially more kilotons or megatons than 15 hiroshima bombs.

[AdvocacyCorporation]

My mistake - I misunderstood the difference between yield and the actual quantity of missiles available. It makes sense though.

I think the point remains the same. If we do use them we all die - immediately or later.

Winds blow nuclear stuff all over the place and the military personnel coming back from war when they have children in some cases of high exposure are coming out deformed in just using DU. DU dust also spreads so we are ALREADY toxifying each other.

Watch Beyond Treason

[wandermank18]

Ted, I respect your point of view. Ff nukes serve as a deterent, why don't we just save enough nukes so we could destroy the world ONCE, and then not spend any more money on it?

Being able to destroy the world 20 times over (or whatever) is a waste of money, even if the nukes are working as an effective deterrent. Those extra nukes cost money to maintain. We could cave taxpayer dollars by not having such a ridiculously huge amount.

[ImTedBell]

Lets say we save enough nukes to destory the planet once over.

Assuming it came down to actually using them, why leave ourselves shorthanded in the event of being struck first, or having our own nukes neutralized by anti missile defense systems?

Nuclear weapons are a prime example of "he who has the most toys wins".

[nodonjuan]

Well Ted,

Don't you think having 1/10 of what we have would be deterrent enough? If not, maybe you should get out more. Are you, let me guess...A defense contractor?