John seems to be relying on the assumption that someone can't pertain to a sexuality until they have sex with someone (or, at least, that's what I can make out of... whatever the fuck he's saying). Question: wouldn't you have to know that you're attracted to an individual before you made the conscious, willing decision to have sex with them? Because by his logic you also can't call yourself straight until you've slept with someone of the opposite sex.
"Practicing Homosexual" we don't Practice. We are not a Sports Team. We are Humans. The Heterosexuals I guess "Practice" their sexuality. The Best Part is when the "guy" said "He" and Brian said, "Or She" tried to sidestep it placing He as meaning both Men and Women. I Love how "Religion" still make Women second class.
he just tried saying ALL people have normal same sex attractions. WHAT A LOAD. and only people who act on them are gay. no if you have those feelings, YOUR GAY
O my god.... ha ha... can you imagine what it was like to defend homosexuals back then??? and can you imagine how future scholars will react when they watch videos such as this a hundred years from now.... unbelievable.
The "ex-gay" is upset because if homosexual is used in it's proper term to include anyone who has sexual desires for persons of the same gender, then he would have to conclude that he isn't actually "ex-gay". I wonder where this man is today! I would love to know how his life turned out!
Yes, please, will you post the rest of the interview? BTW, the title says this was in 1979, but the description says it was in the 1990s (one of the tags is 1999). What was the actual year this interview took place?
This is really interesting. Do you know what became of Mr. Hansen?
sonoki82 1 day ago in playlist More videos from bmcnaught
john is so stupid i cant even begin to say how dumb he sounds
thugz00 1 month ago
John seems to be relying on the assumption that someone can't pertain to a sexuality until they have sex with someone (or, at least, that's what I can make out of... whatever the fuck he's saying). Question: wouldn't you have to know that you're attracted to an individual before you made the conscious, willing decision to have sex with them? Because by his logic you also can't call yourself straight until you've slept with someone of the opposite sex.
TheObservantOne1 2 months ago
"Practicing homosexual"
MrMrLemons 4 months ago
everyone here is saying the word homosexual and not the word gay, did that word not exist back then?
speedx50 7 months ago
"Practicing Homosexual" we don't Practice. We are not a Sports Team. We are Humans. The Heterosexuals I guess "Practice" their sexuality. The Best Part is when the "guy" said "He" and Brian said, "Or She" tried to sidestep it placing He as meaning both Men and Women. I Love how "Religion" still make Women second class.
Mr1958louief 7 months ago
he just tried saying ALL people have normal same sex attractions. WHAT A LOAD. and only people who act on them are gay. no if you have those feelings, YOUR GAY
isakechaos 7 months ago
that lady told him like no other
isakechaos 7 months ago
Brian McNaught is a fire-brand, a strong performance!
MEpianist 8 months ago
O my god.... ha ha... can you imagine what it was like to defend homosexuals back then??? and can you imagine how future scholars will react when they watch videos such as this a hundred years from now.... unbelievable.
RodTalon00 8 months ago
What happened with John Hansen (Hasen)? I did not find any info on the web. Not even google find him!! Is he alive? Is he still a "ex-gay" activist?
davidnjonathan7 11 months ago
@davidnjonathan7 did you find out the answer to your question about the X-gay
RodTalon00 8 months ago
@RodTalon00 No, it is hard to despair like that with today's technology, I am impressed
davidnjonathan7 8 months ago
John Hasen is a slimy disgusting bigot. He's barely even trying to hide it.
ihaterobbie123 1 year ago 2
he is a practicing homosexual.. practicing? nice...
dckimchi117 1 year ago
The "ex-gay" is upset because if homosexual is used in it's proper term to include anyone who has sexual desires for persons of the same gender, then he would have to conclude that he isn't actually "ex-gay". I wonder where this man is today! I would love to know how his life turned out!
goodgirlkay 1 year ago
Yes, please, will you post the rest of the interview? BTW, the title says this was in 1979, but the description says it was in the 1990s (one of the tags is 1999). What was the actual year this interview took place?
TheStrong32 1 year ago
@TheStrong32 It was in 1979.
bmcnaught 1 year ago
I find it funny that he's talking about "intelligent conversation" when he's clearly a disgusting bigot.
llTomlll 1 year ago
Will there be a part two?
0Clairvoyant0 1 year ago