Just keep on going dude! you are doing great. My friends here in YT are doing the same with their own vehicles. I wish I can get started, but I just don't have the resources- all sort of it, hehehe- to start with. I also have designs of HHO devices but all I can do is draw it in 3D. Please see my channel too.
It cannot work other than maybe recouping excess energy produced by your alternator. Your hho generate draws power from the alt equal to the energy needed to split the water molecule. This causes your alternator to resist spinning more thus consuming power from the engine. Then when to hho is ignited and recombined into water the energy that is given back to the engine is equal to the energy originally taken from the engine to split the water.
Hey Steve, just like myself guy, I like to try things for my self too, you might be surprised at the cost of fuel here in Scotland though { UK} its £1.23 per litre, 1 imperial gallon = 4.54 Litres = £5.58 = $ 8.56 USD. Surprised !!!, or Astonished !!!, either way that’s the price of a UK Gallon today.
Ok, so all the nay sayers please just hold on a seconds and think for a moment. I know that most hho units added to cars with fuel injection will likely show little to no positive results since the injection works on the measurement of acceptable amount of wasted fuel measured in the exhaust, so if you increase burn efficiency it will read and interpret this as a mixture that is too lean and actually squirt in MORE fuel, potentially DECREASING mileage, But... (continued)
(continued) But is that because it's not increasing burn efficiency or is it because of design flaw in fuel injection systems? And I do agree that most HHO generator produce an insufficient amount to make any real difference. But what all these experiments are proving is that the oil companies and all their lackeys are full of crap when they say Hydrogen isnt a viable fuel source. A simple solar panel can be used in conjunction with a HHO unit at home and generate and store h2 all day for free.
(continued) So who wouldn't want a fuel that burns clean, potentially had more power than gasoline, and can be produced for the cost of a solar panel array and an electrolyzer and a storage system? While you are gone all day at work the setup generates and stores your fuel for next day or whatever.
Safe storage tanks utilizing hydrides and store close to how much the same size tank could hold liquid hydrogen this makes it very difficult if not impossible for the tank to explode in an accident.
I don't know about the details, but the gas seems to burn more thoroughly, and I think the cost of using home AC to produce hydrogen for auto fuel ends up less than the cost of gasoline. It isn't a 2nd Law issue, though some cell phones do charge their batteries using ambient radio waves. Overunity? Looks that way, but it really isn't.
GREAT JOB!!! after a lot of hours investigating on this, I'm in, i do have good results, i do have data that confirm what you says, i have save about 950 euros on fuel since i have intaled in my car! so...BS, what BS? these are people that i'm shore still believes that the men on the moon is a FAKE video !!!!! can you believe it!
Believe it. The purpose of the hydrogen is to act as an ignition accellerant, to burn the fuel (gas) faster. Advancing timing gives a longer stroke, so MORE POWER can be extracted from each stroke, increasing efficiency of the burn and the stroke. As a result of the better energy conversion, the exhaust manifold is measurably cooler when running on HHO. It makes perfect sense chemically, mechanically and thermodynamically. I buy the concept and I have a master's degree in chemistry.
Wrong wrong wrong... Advancing timing DOES NOTHING to stroke first (where do you get this nonsense). Stroke is fixed by crank throw. Advancing timing increases cylinder temps and pressures. If you have a masters degree and agree with this, agian wrong. I've performed development testing (with their Ph.D. chemical engineer) and lab grade equipment. Conservation of energy is the law governing this process. Since there are several processes and none are 100% efficient, how can you extract power.
I can verify SMALL increases in fuel efficiency happened, but HOW it happens it the question. Ph.D level chemists theorize it the basics of gas combustion on the atomic level. More of the exhaust was pushed to CO2 while NOx and HC were greatly reduced. There is a point at which the energy required to disassociate the atoms is more than the energy created from the H. I would like to disclose more info, but I probably shouldnt.
The people who say it cant be done need to specify what it is they are actually talking about. 1. 100% hydrogen on demand powered car? or
2. Oxy Hydrogen booster using the extra power generated by the alternator to produce the HHO.
They havent done their homework either way, or they are reps from big oil and gas just trying to turn researchers agenst one another in hopes it will make everyone look like idiot conspiracy theory anti government wackos. I know it works (booster) DallasGB
There are 3 kinds of people; the Will's, the Won'ts, and the Cain'ts. The Will's will try anything. The Won'ts won't try nothing; and the Cain'ts never could do anything.
I installed it in an Escalade 6.o L 12.8 mpg average for two weeks before (Mostly Highway). After putting a Smackbooster on I got as high as 19.6 mpg. I disconnected it waiting on an O2 controler and have not gotten back to it due to time issues. I do think some of the increase may have been cleaning as sbotech suggest, because the mileage stepped up as I drove it and stayed up for awhile after disconnecting. Now it is back to 12.8. I'm thinking it works, so prove all the naysayers wrong.
Good luck with your project. I hope more people will experiment before they debunk. I was getting only 22 mpg all summer with my Ford Taurus, I made a cell and installed it. With the cell I was getting 28 mpg. Now that it is colder I removed the cell and I am getting 25 mpg. Did using HHO clean my motor? I should work on a portable cell so I can bring it inside when it's freezing out.
Steve, It Works!!! If I drive like a maniac on expressway (or normal for me)my mpg gains last time on a 1,400 mile round trip still netted me an eight (8) mpg GAIN!!! If I drive conservative like lately I can get 50.25 (FIFTY)mpg. With a 1986 Honda Accord and 300,000 miles showing on odometer. True the first attempt to put a man on the moon took awhile, however the only time its' a failure is when we quit!! I will guarantee you will see improvements if you stick to it and don't give up.
2 simple boosters built on the Lang Bros. design in water4gas got me from 4o mpg to 48.3 on a 250 mile trip in my 05 Honda Civic but using 302 stainless, it degraded too quickly. I am going to rebuild with 316 Stainless. which I hope will survive. It does for the Lang Bros. I also used baking soda as an electrolyzer. Working with a Smack has been more difficult. I use a PWM to control voltage, + Exhaust temp guage. I use a Map sensor Enh. and one Oxyisolator on my air fuel sensor.
the implosion comments are missing the point, Yuri Brown explained the physics of Browns gas (HHO) in the 70's. there is a video of his explanation on YouTube. also, Stan Meyers water splitter pulse generator is explained by a guy named Linderman in another video here on Tube. Its acting like a capacitor that fills up with low amps and volts until it discharges at high enough power to break the H2O bonds.
Hey Steve, keep going at it. Im in procees of making HHO generator as well. Looks like your further along than me. To all the naysayers; People said we would never put a man on the moon, well we did nearly 40 yrs ago. They can walk off a cliff and tell gravity ''I DON'T BELIEVE IN GRAVITY AS THEY FALL. Good luck, look forward to your progress. 410sprinter3.
Yea hopefully enough of us "little guys" will spread the word and this HHO will be a type of grassroots movement - one where the people decide whats best.
@AlmostHydrogen yes sanity at last keep up the good work mate ive been trying to say the exact thing you said in the video to a bunch of nahsayers. just ignore them types of people if they had it their way we would still be in the dark ages or something would do my own experiment but every time i get a chance theres always something else to do and really need to get the stuff ready like the stainless steel plates and gaskets with persplex plastic if you know where to get it all from letmeknow
My point is a bubbler shouldn't theoretically improve millage any more then injecting water into a low compression motor. The extra drag on your alternator will offset the gains. Until we think outside of the box. Hydrogen Peroxide,Gallium,Bauxite or some other organic recyclable non polluting method of separating the elements.
Search google for Hydrogen Hybrid Technologies. They are listed on the Stock exchange HYHY. They are doing basically this same thing and according to their website.
increasing the adiabatic efficiency of the engine (typically a modern diesel engine runs around 40% efficient - an increase of only 4% in the adiabatic efficiency results in a 10% decrease in fuel consumption!).
They have agreements in four countries right now. It works whether you believe or not.
I am actively involved in my own HHO endeavors. Water is the answer there is alot of energy stored in it. Electrolysis alone isnt the answer. Electrolysis was discovered in 1839 and look into all the materials, devices, additives, high and low frequencies, etc that were used.I havnt seen one thing on you tube that wasnt done in the 1800's Everyone from Cambridge,Allis-Chalmer,Pratt&Whitney,Nasa,GE,Ford,Honda,GM have worked on this since 1839. Record 46% efficiency was achieved with Nuclear 1/08.
Some people just do not like change. They wont accept it until they have no choice. Well, i have a grudge against pretty much all corporate types, especially big oil. So i really dont care if this runs them out of buisness and they all work at Mcdonalds or wal mart or something.
Here is the thing. Dan is full of crap. he does not know what he is talking about. He obviously did not pay attention in high school science. From his comment, i doubt he even attended. The End.
Ever seen those big tanks of anhydrous amonia on the farm fields? They are full of amonia with the hydrogen stripped off. Most agree that this is a much weaker bond and easier source for hydrogen production. Just what to do with the left over amonia?
Due to EPA regs, our cars are all calibrated to the minimum emissions curve. Minimum emissions point is located between max power and max efficiency without overheat, so you can lean out your car a bit by fooling the O2 sensor and run at minimum acceptable fuel usage level possibly saving 10% or more. However, your emissions will increase as a result. You may wish to get a variable O2 circuit in operation before injecting gas so you know how much savings is from gas and elsewhere.
Good luck to you. While I believe it is true that it takes more energy to break the oxygen bond in water than burning the HHO yeilds back, if the additive makes your gas burn more completely due to the extremely hot, quick explosion of hydrogen, this could be the source of any improvement. If you plan to mess with your O2 sensor, be aware, there are 3 fuel/air mixture curves used in the industry: max power, max economy, and minimum emissions. (see next)
Me iam trying a different technique now, Iam wanting to to go intot the area of having a larger cell powerd by solar pannels, ther is a way to do it, i am working on it as we speek.Also no rule book that says you can't use anymeans to step up lower voltage to higher voltages :) Oh don't cameras take something like 3-6 volts and step it up to 1,550 volts to fire a cameras strobe? gee isnt that taking litle engery and then getting a greater out . Seleh, that means think aobut it.
Steve, Its standard engineer brainwash... you cant get more out than you put in. Therefore: you cannot light one match, light charcoal and cook several meals with the "less" energy in. Think there is some potential energy in the coal? Like in the water? Hmmm, food for thought. Modern cars burn about 95% of fuel injected, so hho is not just helping it burn better. We can argue about water for fuel and do nothing, as the Japanese beat us to it. Search YT for Genepax, then rub Dan's nose in it.
Personally, I don't think this even approaches over unity. I have a cell, & it works. I have 2 theories as to why: 1. A catalytic reaction HHO helps the gasoline burn easier or better. A blasting cap for gas, basically. 2. Some say HHO has an implosive effect when ignited. Since a gas engine is firing at 3-7 degrees above top dead center, perhaps this implosion draws the piston up a bit, hence less drag or friction. My thoughts for what they're worth. BTW, I get avg mpg increase of 6 mpg.
Let me tell you firsthand that it does work but there are alot of hurdles you have to clear first. Dealing with heat, corrosion and placement of HHO cells in small engine bays being the top problems but it is doable. Heat and corrosion compound the longevity of the cell and increase the maintenance intervals. So alot must be considered before you throw a cell in your car....which is what im dealing with right now. Crazy is not using HHO in your car.....crazy is paying $5+ for gas and smiling.LOL
Steve, do not listen to the nay-sayers. I live in Minneapolis where I install HHO systems for a living. They do work, and work well, but since they have been primarily built by do-it-yourselfers, there have been mixed results. I was convinced this technology was snake-oil, so I bought a unit that had a money back guarantee, fully expecting to return it. Today I am driving a Jeep Grand Cherokee and getting over 30 MPG. Installations can be tricky - let me know if I can be of assistance - Dean
every "educated" person that I try to tell that I have boosted my MPG with hydrogen on demand come back and tell me that there is a law of physics called Conservation of Energy that make it impossible. I wonder how much time you can get for breaking that law?
Steve, from what I have read on the numerous sites dealing with HHO, you MUST fool the cars computer into believing that the mixture has not been changed. You probably know this already, but, for what it's worth check into this. The o2 sensor will adjust the mixture to enrich it. This is where you intervene. Enjoyed your videos!
Cool. I havent even looked into frequencies or any other stuff, just the basics. Be sure to post your progress on your project - it would be cool to see others in what they are doing too.
Welcome to the world of energy independence, the guy called sidyoung has about the best production that I have seen so far, even better than me. Remember the purpose of a blower or turbo, what is it they really do? They put in more oxygen, now just what an water seperator do, put more oxygen in the system just as a turbo or blower will do. Now this is not even counting the hydrogen, just the oxygen. These are the questions they will stay away from. You will do fine, and welcome to hho savings.
Good video man , Im doing the same thing trying it for my self , put it in one car and made the motor run better has better pickup but only getting 2 or 3 mpg gain ,thats better than zero tho.Got another car going to try out next weekend..i need to make some vids on my hho stuff..like you say if i dont get any big gains hey it has been fun playing with it..
"heresay" its in the books as laws of thermo dynamic orsomething like that, but no one has proven any different, theres no real science class involved, just us youtubers, so keep it up, and prove it to yourself, f@#$ the sceptics.
Hey Steve my name is Robert and I know all about the negative comments. I have never put a video out due too not having a camera but I started doing this about 3 months ago and everyone at work laughed at me thought I was crazy. I have been called Hydrogen Rob at work from all my pals making fun of me but guess what. Everone that was laughing at me now are making their own cell or I have built them one. God I love it. Now my name is back too Rob lol. Keep the faith and dont get discouraged.
Just keep on going dude! you are doing great. My friends here in YT are doing the same with their own vehicles. I wish I can get started, but I just don't have the resources- all sort of it, hehehe- to start with. I also have designs of HHO devices but all I can do is draw it in 3D. Please see my channel too.
Keep posting anything you find, good or bad.
jmsapinoso 1 year ago
It cannot work other than maybe recouping excess energy produced by your alternator. Your hho generate draws power from the alt equal to the energy needed to split the water molecule. This causes your alternator to resist spinning more thus consuming power from the engine. Then when to hho is ignited and recombined into water the energy that is given back to the engine is equal to the energy originally taken from the engine to split the water.
TheConundrumb 1 year ago
just like add that , we expect the £6.00 a gallon to be here before new year....
ooch its painfull LOL.
thom
fuelban 1 year ago
Hey Steve, just like myself guy, I like to try things for my self too, you might be surprised at the cost of fuel here in Scotland though { UK} its £1.23 per litre, 1 imperial gallon = 4.54 Litres = £5.58 = $ 8.56 USD. Surprised !!!, or Astonished !!!, either way that’s the price of a UK Gallon today.
Thom in Scotland.
fuelban 1 year ago
Keep up the great work! Please let me know what you find out, cause Im very interested in trying to make one for my Isuzu.
LeprikonnSH 1 year ago
Ok, so all the nay sayers please just hold on a seconds and think for a moment. I know that most hho units added to cars with fuel injection will likely show little to no positive results since the injection works on the measurement of acceptable amount of wasted fuel measured in the exhaust, so if you increase burn efficiency it will read and interpret this as a mixture that is too lean and actually squirt in MORE fuel, potentially DECREASING mileage, But... (continued)
RTJaKaL 1 year ago
(continued) But is that because it's not increasing burn efficiency or is it because of design flaw in fuel injection systems? And I do agree that most HHO generator produce an insufficient amount to make any real difference. But what all these experiments are proving is that the oil companies and all their lackeys are full of crap when they say Hydrogen isnt a viable fuel source. A simple solar panel can be used in conjunction with a HHO unit at home and generate and store h2 all day for free.
RTJaKaL 1 year ago
(continued) So who wouldn't want a fuel that burns clean, potentially had more power than gasoline, and can be produced for the cost of a solar panel array and an electrolyzer and a storage system? While you are gone all day at work the setup generates and stores your fuel for next day or whatever.
Safe storage tanks utilizing hydrides and store close to how much the same size tank could hold liquid hydrogen this makes it very difficult if not impossible for the tank to explode in an accident.
RTJaKaL 1 year ago
I don't know about the details, but the gas seems to burn more thoroughly, and I think the cost of using home AC to produce hydrogen for auto fuel ends up less than the cost of gasoline. It isn't a 2nd Law issue, though some cell phones do charge their batteries using ambient radio waves. Overunity? Looks that way, but it really isn't.
cusanusnicolas 1 year ago
GREAT JOB!!! after a lot of hours investigating on this, I'm in, i do have good results, i do have data that confirm what you says, i have save about 950 euros on fuel since i have intaled in my car! so...BS, what BS? these are people that i'm shore still believes that the men on the moon is a FAKE video !!!!! can you believe it!
javireku 2 years ago
Can you make it at home.
Can you make it storable.
Can you move storage into car and drive with pure HHO longer than with electricity.
THATs what we wan to know.
Is there allready actually usable enviromentally friendly method of driving
WHITOUT paying for cas or fuel????????????
Blobblogger 2 years ago
Believe it. The purpose of the hydrogen is to act as an ignition accellerant, to burn the fuel (gas) faster. Advancing timing gives a longer stroke, so MORE POWER can be extracted from each stroke, increasing efficiency of the burn and the stroke. As a result of the better energy conversion, the exhaust manifold is measurably cooler when running on HHO. It makes perfect sense chemically, mechanically and thermodynamically. I buy the concept and I have a master's degree in chemistry.
Lucas76020 2 years ago
Wrong wrong wrong... Advancing timing DOES NOTHING to stroke first (where do you get this nonsense). Stroke is fixed by crank throw. Advancing timing increases cylinder temps and pressures. If you have a masters degree and agree with this, agian wrong. I've performed development testing (with their Ph.D. chemical engineer) and lab grade equipment. Conservation of energy is the law governing this process. Since there are several processes and none are 100% efficient, how can you extract power.
DaG37boy 2 years ago
You spelled "again" incorrectly. DaG37boy
stratman250 1 year ago
I can verify SMALL increases in fuel efficiency happened, but HOW it happens it the question. Ph.D level chemists theorize it the basics of gas combustion on the atomic level. More of the exhaust was pushed to CO2 while NOx and HC were greatly reduced. There is a point at which the energy required to disassociate the atoms is more than the energy created from the H. I would like to disclose more info, but I probably shouldnt.
DaG37boy 2 years ago
the shit works. i've done it. whats all i gotta say.
nickwatchesthis 3 years ago
Steve did you see the video 524 liters per minute ?where you can see howmuch BTU has one liter hydrogen 11.48 BTU
What do you think from this video ? is that trhue? Greatings from Coste Rica Coen
CoenIngw 3 years ago
The people who say it cant be done need to specify what it is they are actually talking about. 1. 100% hydrogen on demand powered car? or
2. Oxy Hydrogen booster using the extra power generated by the alternator to produce the HHO.
They havent done their homework either way, or they are reps from big oil and gas just trying to turn researchers agenst one another in hopes it will make everyone look like idiot conspiracy theory anti government wackos. I know it works (booster) DallasGB
dallasgoldbug 3 years ago
This was taken from daddyo44907 web sit
There are 3 kinds of people; the Will's, the Won'ts, and the Cain'ts. The Will's will try anything. The Won'ts won't try nothing; and the Cain'ts never could do anything.
We are as one the doers! keep it up!
beginerhydro 3 years ago
I installed it in an Escalade 6.o L 12.8 mpg average for two weeks before (Mostly Highway). After putting a Smackbooster on I got as high as 19.6 mpg. I disconnected it waiting on an O2 controler and have not gotten back to it due to time issues. I do think some of the increase may have been cleaning as sbotech suggest, because the mileage stepped up as I drove it and stayed up for awhile after disconnecting. Now it is back to 12.8. I'm thinking it works, so prove all the naysayers wrong.
dacfrac 3 years ago
Great video, and it WORKS!
Azasael 3 years ago
But I mean to run exclusively on hh0
guitartec 3 years ago
I believe hho will work under VERY exotic conditions, but you'll either get better gas mileage or power, but not both.
Let's see what you get. I'm all ears.
guitartec 3 years ago
Good luck with your project. I hope more people will experiment before they debunk. I was getting only 22 mpg all summer with my Ford Taurus, I made a cell and installed it. With the cell I was getting 28 mpg. Now that it is colder I removed the cell and I am getting 25 mpg. Did using HHO clean my motor? I should work on a portable cell so I can bring it inside when it's freezing out.
sbotech 3 years ago
I have a working cell I made watching vids on YOUTUBE
jrod8496 3 years ago
Some of the NAY sayer's still believe in Trapaning (Boring a hole in the head to let bad spirits out) as a cure for a common head ache..
crazzieg 3 years ago
Steve, It Works!!! If I drive like a maniac on expressway (or normal for me)my mpg gains last time on a 1,400 mile round trip still netted me an eight (8) mpg GAIN!!! If I drive conservative like lately I can get 50.25 (FIFTY)mpg. With a 1986 Honda Accord and 300,000 miles showing on odometer. True the first attempt to put a man on the moon took awhile, however the only time its' a failure is when we quit!! I will guarantee you will see improvements if you stick to it and don't give up.
larrylclappjr 3 years ago
2 simple boosters built on the Lang Bros. design in water4gas got me from 4o mpg to 48.3 on a 250 mile trip in my 05 Honda Civic but using 302 stainless, it degraded too quickly. I am going to rebuild with 316 Stainless. which I hope will survive. It does for the Lang Bros. I also used baking soda as an electrolyzer. Working with a Smack has been more difficult. I use a PWM to control voltage, + Exhaust temp guage. I use a Map sensor Enh. and one Oxyisolator on my air fuel sensor.
nerdlnose 3 years ago
the implosion comments are missing the point, Yuri Brown explained the physics of Browns gas (HHO) in the 70's. there is a video of his explanation on YouTube. also, Stan Meyers water splitter pulse generator is explained by a guy named Linderman in another video here on Tube. Its acting like a capacitor that fills up with low amps and volts until it discharges at high enough power to break the H2O bonds.
sailorguns 3 years ago
Hey Steve, keep going at it. Im in procees of making HHO generator as well. Looks like your further along than me. To all the naysayers; People said we would never put a man on the moon, well we did nearly 40 yrs ago. They can walk off a cliff and tell gravity ''I DON'T BELIEVE IN GRAVITY AS THEY FALL. Good luck, look forward to your progress. 410sprinter3.
410sprinter3 3 years ago
Yea hopefully enough of us "little guys" will spread the word and this HHO will be a type of grassroots movement - one where the people decide whats best.
Keep up the good work.
AlmostHydrogen 3 years ago
@AlmostHydrogen yes sanity at last keep up the good work mate ive been trying to say the exact thing you said in the video to a bunch of nahsayers. just ignore them types of people if they had it their way we would still be in the dark ages or something would do my own experiment but every time i get a chance theres always something else to do and really need to get the stuff ready like the stainless steel plates and gaskets with persplex plastic if you know where to get it all from letmeknow
greyandme2 7 months ago
My point is a bubbler shouldn't theoretically improve millage any more then injecting water into a low compression motor. The extra drag on your alternator will offset the gains. Until we think outside of the box. Hydrogen Peroxide,Gallium,Bauxite or some other organic recyclable non polluting method of separating the elements.
inaviddotcom 3 years ago
Search google for Hydrogen Hybrid Technologies. They are listed on the Stock exchange HYHY. They are doing basically this same thing and according to their website.
increasing the adiabatic efficiency of the engine (typically a modern diesel engine runs around 40% efficient - an increase of only 4% in the adiabatic efficiency results in a 10% decrease in fuel consumption!).
They have agreements in four countries right now. It works whether you believe or not.
blueskip 3 years ago
I am actively involved in my own HHO endeavors. Water is the answer there is alot of energy stored in it. Electrolysis alone isnt the answer. Electrolysis was discovered in 1839 and look into all the materials, devices, additives, high and low frequencies, etc that were used.I havnt seen one thing on you tube that wasnt done in the 1800's Everyone from Cambridge,Allis-Chalmer,Pratt&Whitney,Nasa,GE,Ford,Honda,GM have worked on this since 1839. Record 46% efficiency was achieved with Nuclear 1/08.
inaviddotcom 3 years ago
Some people just do not like change. They wont accept it until they have no choice. Well, i have a grudge against pretty much all corporate types, especially big oil. So i really dont care if this runs them out of buisness and they all work at Mcdonalds or wal mart or something.
justinsn95 3 years ago
Here is the thing. Dan is full of crap. he does not know what he is talking about. He obviously did not pay attention in high school science. From his comment, i doubt he even attended. The End.
justinsn95 3 years ago
Oops I clicked the wrong thumb :-( Anyway I agree.
blueskip 3 years ago
He reminds me of my neighbor. You tube is the devil and crap hho won't work. I will tell you one thing its not like paying for gas is holy. Lol
bigglesworth01 3 years ago
You're a leader my friend. I agree. Lots of people go through "hear say"
captncaveman81 3 years ago
Ever seen those big tanks of anhydrous amonia on the farm fields? They are full of amonia with the hydrogen stripped off. Most agree that this is a much weaker bond and easier source for hydrogen production. Just what to do with the left over amonia?
5forward 3 years ago
make meth. ha ha
shamansays 3 years ago
Due to EPA regs, our cars are all calibrated to the minimum emissions curve. Minimum emissions point is located between max power and max efficiency without overheat, so you can lean out your car a bit by fooling the O2 sensor and run at minimum acceptable fuel usage level possibly saving 10% or more. However, your emissions will increase as a result. You may wish to get a variable O2 circuit in operation before injecting gas so you know how much savings is from gas and elsewhere.
5forward 3 years ago
Good luck to you. While I believe it is true that it takes more energy to break the oxygen bond in water than burning the HHO yeilds back, if the additive makes your gas burn more completely due to the extremely hot, quick explosion of hydrogen, this could be the source of any improvement. If you plan to mess with your O2 sensor, be aware, there are 3 fuel/air mixture curves used in the industry: max power, max economy, and minimum emissions. (see next)
5forward 3 years ago
cool tat. I've been running hho for a month and I get 2 extra mpg...doesn't sound like much but it translates to 500 bucks a year
pipinki 3 years ago
Yep I would rather have $500 extra bucks in the bank, that wasted on gas.
;)
AlmostHydrogen 3 years ago
Like I tell people, semiconductors were impossible at one time until they invented one. how often do you use them now? Thanks for this video.
cribcat1 3 years ago
Your welcome and I agree about the semiconductors comment.
;)
AlmostHydrogen 3 years ago
Me iam trying a different technique now, Iam wanting to to go intot the area of having a larger cell powerd by solar pannels, ther is a way to do it, i am working on it as we speek.Also no rule book that says you can't use anymeans to step up lower voltage to higher voltages :) Oh don't cameras take something like 3-6 volts and step it up to 1,550 volts to fire a cameras strobe? gee isnt that taking litle engery and then getting a greater out . Seleh, that means think aobut it.
ShutterbugW 3 years ago
wow, lots of good examples. We just need to keep working. BTW wasnt the world flat at one time too?
;)
AlmostHydrogen 3 years ago
Steve, Its standard engineer brainwash... you cant get more out than you put in. Therefore: you cannot light one match, light charcoal and cook several meals with the "less" energy in. Think there is some potential energy in the coal? Like in the water? Hmmm, food for thought. Modern cars burn about 95% of fuel injected, so hho is not just helping it burn better. We can argue about water for fuel and do nothing, as the Japanese beat us to it. Search YT for Genepax, then rub Dan's nose in it.
lostangeles90745 3 years ago
Lets see , Aircompressors, Jet turbines, hmm lets see waht els takes in a litle and gives greater out put hmmm...should I name more?
Steve is doing what s cietests do all the time, takes a theory, puts it into practice and using the results of that as an answer...
Hmm reminds me of the old argumnt that the world used to be flat.
ShutterbugW 3 years ago
thanks la90745 thanks for the common sense example; I will check out genepax too.
AlmostHydrogen 3 years ago
implosive? Dude , light it in your mouth and watch which way your cheeks move.
ImpeachWandVoteRP08 3 years ago
LOL
now that was funny - if someone does this test, be sure to record and post it on youtube!
:D
AlmostHydrogen 3 years ago
Personally, I don't think this even approaches over unity. I have a cell, & it works. I have 2 theories as to why: 1. A catalytic reaction HHO helps the gasoline burn easier or better. A blasting cap for gas, basically. 2. Some say HHO has an implosive effect when ignited. Since a gas engine is firing at 3-7 degrees above top dead center, perhaps this implosion draws the piston up a bit, hence less drag or friction. My thoughts for what they're worth. BTW, I get avg mpg increase of 6 mpg.
-dave
hoosierinva 3 years ago
implosion refers to atomical recombination of the H+H+O in browns gas. see video of Yuri Brown explain physics of HHO in 1970's.
sailorguns 3 years ago
I think the problem is real science says overunity is not possible, but are we really talking about overunity ? Like to hear an explanation.
quazz1mott0 3 years ago
Let me tell you firsthand that it does work but there are alot of hurdles you have to clear first. Dealing with heat, corrosion and placement of HHO cells in small engine bays being the top problems but it is doable. Heat and corrosion compound the longevity of the cell and increase the maintenance intervals. So alot must be considered before you throw a cell in your car....which is what im dealing with right now. Crazy is not using HHO in your car.....crazy is paying $5+ for gas and smiling.LOL
miked826 3 years ago
I agree there are more parts to the puzzle of HHO than just slapping a cell in your vehicle. I have a lot to learn & do, but I will get there.
LOL, I agree about the crazy high price of gas part too.
thanks for stopping by.
AlmostHydrogen 3 years ago
Steve, do not listen to the nay-sayers. I live in Minneapolis where I install HHO systems for a living. They do work, and work well, but since they have been primarily built by do-it-yourselfers, there have been mixed results. I was convinced this technology was snake-oil, so I bought a unit that had a money back guarantee, fully expecting to return it. Today I am driving a Jeep Grand Cherokee and getting over 30 MPG. Installations can be tricky - let me know if I can be of assistance - Dean
BakerDR1 3 years ago
Hi Dean,
Cool stuff to say the least.
I was considering on doing something similar (money back guarantee bit), but didnt. I am still in the learning & research phase.
As for your Jeep GC, we had one and it only got @ 16-18 mpg, so your 30 mpg is very impressive.
Also thanks for the assistance offer, I might have to take you up on that cause I am not mechanically inclined in that area.
Again, thanks for dropping by.
Steve aka AH
AlmostHydrogen 3 years ago
every "educated" person that I try to tell that I have boosted my MPG with hydrogen on demand come back and tell me that there is a law of physics called Conservation of Energy that make it impossible. I wonder how much time you can get for breaking that law?
KY
KyHighlander59 3 years ago
LOL, hopefully not much.
;)
AlmostHydrogen 3 years ago
Steve, from what I have read on the numerous sites dealing with HHO, you MUST fool the cars computer into believing that the mixture has not been changed. You probably know this already, but, for what it's worth check into this. The o2 sensor will adjust the mixture to enrich it. This is where you intervene. Enjoyed your videos!
Good Luck!
HHONOW
HHONOW 3 years ago
Yes I am running across the same thing. Lots of other pieces to the puzzle.
;)
AlmostHydrogen 3 years ago
Cool. I havent even looked into frequencies or any other stuff, just the basics. Be sure to post your progress on your project - it would be cool to see others in what they are doing too.
AlmostHydrogen 3 years ago
keep it up man I like your style!
batteryphil 3 years ago
Thanks, its been with me for a long time now.
AlmostHydrogen 3 years ago
Welcome to the world of energy independence, the guy called sidyoung has about the best production that I have seen so far, even better than me. Remember the purpose of a blower or turbo, what is it they really do? They put in more oxygen, now just what an water seperator do, put more oxygen in the system just as a turbo or blower will do. Now this is not even counting the hydrogen, just the oxygen. These are the questions they will stay away from. You will do fine, and welcome to hho savings.
h2opower 3 years ago
thanks for the welcome, I look forward to checking vids and learning more too. I see I have a lot to learn.
:)
AlmostHydrogen 3 years ago
Good video man , Im doing the same thing trying it for my self , put it in one car and made the motor run better has better pickup but only getting 2 or 3 mpg gain ,thats better than zero tho.Got another car going to try out next weekend..i need to make some vids on my hho stuff..like you say if i dont get any big gains hey it has been fun playing with it..
jdcmusicman 3 years ago
well at least you got gains of some kind - that in itself proves all the naysayers wrong. Just keep working at it as time permits and have fun.
AlmostHydrogen 3 years ago
"heresay" its in the books as laws of thermo dynamic orsomething like that, but no one has proven any different, theres no real science class involved, just us youtubers, so keep it up, and prove it to yourself, f@#$ the sceptics.
crob227 3 years ago
Hey Steve my name is Robert and I know all about the negative comments. I have never put a video out due too not having a camera but I started doing this about 3 months ago and everyone at work laughed at me thought I was crazy. I have been called Hydrogen Rob at work from all my pals making fun of me but guess what. Everone that was laughing at me now are making their own cell or I have built them one. God I love it. Now my name is back too Rob lol. Keep the faith and dont get discouraged.
asiaollie 3 years ago
Yea it seems like if you try something different there is a lot of initial resistance, but as you said, keep the faith and drive on.
AlmostHydrogen 3 years ago