there is no such thing as KOSHER food in GODS eyes unless its fruits and vegetables GENESIS 1:29 CHRIST is VEGAN and you MEAT eaters better get that through your HEADS whether your so-called christian or sinner JESUS will not come BACK for this or any MURDERING MEAT EATING so -called church NEVER HAPPEN essene gospel of peace
2 Peter 3:15-16 and consider that the longsuffering of our Lord is salvation--as also our beloved brother Paul, according to the wisdom given to him, has written to you, as also in all his epistles, speaking in them of these things, in which are some things hard to understand, which untaught and unstable people twist to their own destruction, as they do also the rest of the Scriptures.
There are mutitudes of scriptural proof that Paul (or whomever made letters available to the council of Rome) made subtle changes to Christ's teachings. I will be more than happy to post a dozen or more for you, if you have not found them already. But the most obvious proof is that Paul declared himself a preacher and founded churches. Christ said to NEVER be a Rabbi and notice He told His disciples to travel through all the cities of Israel until His return (Mat. 10;23). Ergo, NO CHURCHES.
2 Peter 3:15-16 and consider that the longsuffering of our Lord is salvation--as also our beloved brother Paul, according to the wisdom given to him, has written to you, as also in all his epistles, speaking in them of these things, in which are some things hard to understand, which untaught and unstable people twist to their own destruction, as they do also the rest of the Scriptures.
Jesus broke the Mosaic law on many occasions (healing during the Sabbath, eating with the "unclean", talking to a prostitute, abolishing Kashrut, abolishing stoning, claiming to be the son of God).
I don't believe that we are judged on the look of our penis or on what we eat or on what we do on a particular day of the week. We are solely judged on our ability to love our neighbor as ourselves and on how we treat the earth and its living beings.
Saint Paul prepared the Saints to enter a Timeless era, without the Law in vogue and without knowing what time it was. the destruction of the Temple makes Jewish impossible to keep, since only the High Priest could set the days of the week, and those days of the Jewish Law did not match the days of the Roman Calendar, and so the Judaism is a farce, a fraud, using the Roman Saturdays as if that were the Sabbath Day, when it is not any such day. Jesus said "No man would know the day or hour"
The Jews do not keep the Law, since they worship on Saturdays according to the Roman Calendar while the Jewish Calendar is required by the Law of Moses to be affixed anew every 49 years. And so the variations of mismatching the Jewish Law to the Roman days we count, is not the Law of Moses, the real Sabbath Seventh Day is unknown, or falling on Tuesdays, if the Jews were keeping Sabbath Law. So all claims of Jews are false Judaizing, they cannot know what day or hour it is, to Worship.
Observing Kashrut and Circumcision are works of the flesh (sin). These works don't provide any spiritual meaning and they cause unnecessary sufferings.
Jesus was telling us himself that following guidlines (Laws) does not make you righteous. Matt. 15:11. Not that which goeth into the mouth defileth a man; but that which cometh out of the mouth, this defileth a man. God searches the heart. He sees through everything. The Jewish people were being led by "The Synagogue of Satan", Christ came to set things straight, and that he did! :)
i put things in proper context paul paid for peter. paul is to be shielded and humanity will support paul while he is the underdog the rivers of humanity will stand with him. all wickedness shall flee him as he is to be delivered the torch and be sealed.
Saint Paul was strict with himself in his own Jewish Worship , but for the Gentiles, the Revelation of God is that what is given to the gentiles as a Gift of Grace, cannot be concluded as a Law , it begins as Grace and continues forever as Grace. The Law given to the Jews is a Bond , a business between God and the Jews, that is not meant to then Judaize the world into submission, which if submission , then becomes Islam, not Judaism. Paul taught the Christians to be Children , not Adults.
Imagine the Father, as a Rabbi , teaching a mature son , about to Bar Mitzvah. Would the Father not be strict and somber about the duty ? But if the Father has little children also around, while Father is being tough on the young man, Father is winking the eye at the kids and the same person who must be Rabbi to the mature son , is entirely in the right, to let the kids play with his beard and call him "Santa Claus" or the "Devil" if that is what the kids do as their innocent play.
When a Jew comes forward to say this or that is the "Real Truth" ??? Does he not know the Law ? To presume yourself to be the Prophet of God, to declare of yourself the Truth , makes you come into Judgment with God Himself. As for Paul, he was born a Jew and was observant of the Law, but the Law itself does not bind Gentiles, and so Paul as the Apostle to the Gentiles is under Grace, not Law. So, God to the Jews is a strict Rabbi , but to Gentiles, God can be Santa Claus.
Answer this, If those Christian Jews who according to this video states that the original 12 apostles that knew Jesus believed that they also had to keep following the Torah, where is it ever recorded in their entire testimony (New Testament) of them ever again, offering up animal sacrifices for sin atonement??
Fact is, they didn't having understanding that the offering up of Jesus Christ on the cross and His blood shed is the FULFILLMENT of all the Mosaic Law and it's sacrifices forever!
Paul is evidently a threat to both Islam & the heretics of true Christianity, aka the Roman Pagan er... Catholic institution, as he is always singled out because of his teaching & "strong" doctrine that goes deeper to the real core of salvation in Jesus Christ alone by faith without the external acts of circumcision and he was also the one, who being taught by Jesus Christ exclusively on Mt. Sinai for 3 years, received the revelation of the "rapture" of the Bride of Christ. Satan hates Paul!
@Lindemann04109 - Because.......? To the religious Jews, Jesus Christ is a stumblingblock and offensive, fulfilling both the warning that Moses spoke of as well as the varied prophets of God who prophesied that it would be so because of the unrepentant hardness of their hearts toward the Spiritual nature of God's grace toward ALL mankind. So He has blinded their eyes and their ears are deaf in part accordingly to His eternal plan to bring salvation to gentile believers through faith in Christ!
This has got to be the most pathetic attempt to discredit Paul I have ever seen. Almost every single verse this video provides is horribly mistranslated.
Deuteronomy 32:6 Moses asks the Jews " Is not God your Father, your Creator?" So how can Divine God the Eternal be then Eternal as Father, if God the Eternal Father has not a Son who has standing in God as One ? the Messiah is Divine. The Dead Sea Scrolls in Psalms 110 defies the false Jewish version, to show Messiah is Divine " Adonai said to my Adonai" not as the false Jews say Adonai to my adoni. They perverted the text of Torah with a little leaven to leaven the whole lump.
As for truth , the Oracle of the Arabian Sorcerer, Balaam, who cursed Israel, and so Moses later killed that false prophet. Yet the Jews rely on his oracle that God cannot be a man, so the Jews hate God, that Moses killed their Arabian Prophet, whom they served, instead of God. Exodus 4:16, God Yahweh says to Moses. " You will be as Yahweh God to the man" Thus God gives Himself , Face to Face, to be Father and Son, even with Moses, Moses was God to the People. 3=1
When it is said " It is Written" that is a Divine Oracle. Now, who was there at Mount Moriah ? There was a father named Abraham, with his son named Isaac and then the Holy Spirit came to spare the father, his only son. How many times must the story be told to see , this is the Trinity, the Father, The Son, The Holy Ghost, assembled in the Unity , to offer the Sacrifice which justifies God Himself, not the man. Three assembled in God's Name, is still God who is One. 3=1
How can there be a "real truth" , either there is Truth, or there is no such thing. So to say "real truth" brings into question if the notion has any truth at all. God as the Truth is Self Evident. Saint Paul is who he is, by God the History of Mankind is guarded over by God Himself. How can anyone then offer us a "real truth" ??? If God is not Author and Actor of all that there is, then God is nothing . Saint Paul is the Truth that God has presented in History.
Paul stopped persecuting the Natsarim for uttering the Name, and became a Natsari (Acts 24:5), in fact, a "ringleader" of that sect. Was Luke also a heretic for travelling with him? Paul said we "establish" the Torah.
What did Jesus accomplish on the cross? He died for our sins folks even yours! And thank God He did! Dont listen to these men on youtube these blasphemers of God and His saints! Please read the bible for yourselves and let God speak to your hearts!!
easiest way to expose paul: 2 timothy 1:15 "This you know, that ALL those in ASIA have turned away from me." It's ludicrus that Christianity does sermons on being the church of philadelphia or thyatira, ephesus, etc, when these are the churches in ASIA that Yeshua sent his letters to, and commended Ephesus for denouncing Paul. The Jews in Acts that wanted to kill Paul were from ASIA. You'd think a clergymen who dedicates their life to scripture would pick it up, are they without excuse?
@Phaedron777 Another good way to expose Paul is to ask this question. What do Paul and Jezebel (Revelation 2:20) have in common? Answer: They both misled Jesus' servants into eating food sacrificed to idols.(1 Corinthians Ch 8-10).PS The 15 talents are 15 kingdom parables, keep your eye on the scribe Mat. 13:52, the eye is the lamp of the body! God bless. The last will be first and the first will be last, The parable of the talents reveals that we are the farmers that sow the seed
from the time ancient ,puranic times ,there may be mistakes of ONE OR TWO PERSONS .mistakes would have been due to bad wisedom ,bad thoughts ,wrong decessions or bad fate and which made sinner and sinner and could not come out of sins . due to that others also became victims .at those times itself some wise peoples would have taken proper steps for betterment of others .that mistakes should not be repeated .there would have been no bad happenings..
I"m one of the two witnesses in the book of Revelation. God said I'm the prophet and the Law of Moses, its called the Law and The prophets. If you want to read my prophesies follow me on twitter. @yaaofoah2002. Theresa Peprah
Occultists are always trying to split St Paul off from Jesus. Divide et impera, eh, chaps? This only fools people who don't know their Bible. Even in the Old Testament, it was declare that the Messiah would be a 'light to lighten the Gentiles' (Isiah 42, echoed in Luke 2)
This is nothing new, its just the same way many others have done their best to try to instill doubt to untrained people about the reliability of what the Holy Spirit inspired the writers of the New Testament scriptures to put down. Jesus said "I haven't come to abolish the law, but to fulfill it". And if dallasjewishboy can get people to doubt about what Paul wrote then he can get people to question the rest of the New Testament as well. He is only banking on people not knowing better. WRONG!!!!
In reality, it's the Hasidic, ashkenzi(European Khazaria Caucasian ancestry ) jews who have dropped the real Torah in favor of the teaching of the rabbis in the Talmud. They place higher authority in the rabbis commentaries then they do the Scriptures penned by Moses and the prophets themselves. dallasjewishboy doesn't even mention any of these facts in this video, but he will post his views on what he twists out of the scriptures about what Paul says about real relationship with God thru Jesus
In Acts 5:17 the high priest and his friends, who were Sadducees (Can't get more Jewish then this I would say) reacted with violent jealousy and arrested the apostles and put them in jail, FOR PERFORMING MIRACLES AND SIGNS AND WONDERS AMONG THE PEOPLE, JUST LIKE JESUS, WHOM THEY PUT TO DEATH DID. Is there a correlation here? Paul NEVER dropped the Torah, in Acts 17:3 Paul interpreted the SCRIPTURES to the Thessalonians and in Berea the jews searched the scriptures daily to verify what Paul said!
He also seems to forget that in Acts 11:1-18 the apostle Peter , after the conversion of Cornelius and his entire family, went to Jerusalem to explain to the other apostles that God had also granted Gentile the privilege of turning from sin and receiving eternal life. The Apostles didn't see themselves as Jews. THEY WERE JEWS!!! The persecution of the early Church came to jewish believers before Saul was ever converted, and that persecution came by way of other Jews. Obviously you didn't read it
Funny that dallasjewishboy relates Saul's encounter with the risen Jesus as a 'mind-altering experience'. Lets see what the definition of that is... Adj. 1. mind-altering - producing mood changes or distorted perception; "hallucinogenic drugs are mind-altering substances"
psychoactive, psychotropic - affecting the mind or mood or other mental processes; "psychoactive drugs". It is obvious and clear that he sees Saul's personal experience with Jesus as just some type of distorted perception.
Paul stated that it was the Law that clearly showed him his need for Savior from the requirements of the Law that he could never, ever keep, and the Law also showed him his desire to sin, again showing that it was impossible for him or anyone else to satisfy the requirement of the Law, therefore the Father, rich in love and mercy sent His only begotten, perfect Son, Jesus to give his perfect life as payment to fulfill it. Paul also stated that through faith in Christ there is no Jew or gentile
Obviously dallasjewishboy is leaving out quite a bit about Judaism that he doesn't want to make known in his video. What is even more interesting is that is his twisted words he forget that Paul stated in Romans 7:12 But still, the law itself is holy right and good. As well as Romans 10:4 For Christ has already accomplished the purpose for which the law was given. As a result, all who believe in him are made right with God. Paul clearly stated that God gave the law to show man how sinful he was
Judaism in many areas defines 'Torah' as not just the established Hebrew Bible but also the Talmud with all of the Mischnah & Gemarah which it considers more important than the scriptures themselves as show in statements like 'My son, give heed to the words of the scribes rather that the words of the law'. Or Sanhedrin X, 3 f.88b 'he who transgresses the words of the scribes sins more gravely than the transgressors of the words of the law.' How can you trust those who believe men over scripture?
2 Peter 3:15-16 This is just as our beloved brother Paul wrote to you with the wisdom God gave him - speaking of these things in all of his letters. Some of his comments are hard to understand, and those who are IGNORANT and UNSTABLE have TWISTED his letters around to mean something quite different from what he meant, JUST AS THEY DO OTHER PARTS OF SCRIPTURE - and the result is disaster for them. Peter clearly places Paul's writings on the same level as already establishes scripture.
The reason there are no letters to Paul from the real Apostle of Yahshua is they would not have anything to do with Paul the twister of truth. AS the essence Church proves with Paul's words to Timothy ,All yes All in Asia have reject me as an Apostle.And, how did they know Paul was a lair,Paul never met Yahshua or knew him .As Paul told us. Only 14 people ever met the test of an Apostle and Paul failed that test.That is why Paul said I am one because you say I am one. Paul lies!!!
@odephraimchai 2 Peter 3:15-16 This is just as our beloved brother Paul wrote to you with the wisdom God gave him - speaking of these things in all of his letters. Some of his comments are hard to understand, and those who are IGNORANT and UNSTABLE have TWISTED his letters around to mean something quite different from what he meant, JUST AS THEY DO OTHER PARTS OF SCRIPTURE - and the result is disaster for them. Paul did meet the risen Jesus, on the road to Damascus. Scripture proves you wrong.
@dkarnish cow dung!!! Although 2 Peter internally purports to be a work of the apostle, most biblical scholars have concluded that Peter is not the author and consider the epistle pseudepigraphical.[3] Reasons for this include its linguistic differences from 1 Peter, its apparent use of Jude, possible allusions to 2nd-century gnosticism, encouragement in the wake of a delayed parousia, and weak external support.[4]
@odephraimchai WHAT BIBLICAL scholars mind you? I hear that statement ALL the time, why don't you name a few of these scholars? Let me guess, how may of them sit on the Jesus seminar? And show me a position from any scholar older than twenty five years that states that 2 Peter was part of the canon from the original council. please don't repeat googled info from recent webpages, state proof, not conjecture. There is your cow dung. Don't make me start listing scholars and texts on your baloney.
@odephraimchai I will trust the words of the original canon that was placed together by those that were 1600 years closer to the source material ANY DAY over the modern scholars who have tenure to collect and book deals to get signed due to their controversial nature. Instead of google-ing to back up your point, why don't you point out, using the rest of the canon, where the 2 Epistle of Peter is contradictory in any way? Scripture is the best commentary on Scripture, use it to prove your point.
@dkarnish The original canon are crab created by false teachers ,with over 300 different christian churches which can not agree upon the same god they created! LOL The questions of authorship and date are closely related. Self-evidently if Peter the Apostle wrote this epistle then it must have been written prior to his death in c 65–67AD. The letter refers to the Pauline epistles and so must post-date them, regardless of authorship, thus a date before 60 is not probable. cont.
@odephraimchai Many scholars consider the epistle to be written c 100–150AD and so contend that it is pseudepigraphical. The argument for a late date see Harris. For a 'middle date' see Bauckham who opts for a date between 80–90AD as most probable. For an early date and (usually) for a defense of the Apostle Peter's authorship see Kruger, Zahn,Spitta, Bigg, and Green. Jeremy Duff argues that the various strands of evidence "point towards the period 60–130 CE, to favour 80–90 CE.
@odephraimchai okay this pointless, WHICH Scholars consider it to be written then, making it Pseudepigraphical. Stephen Harris is from the Jesus seminar and no truly respectable Bible scholars will pay him any mind other then his JS friends. Bauckham I have never heard of. You are throwing names out like you popped those off of Wikipedia or some other web page, but regardless of that, your last sentence speaks about people that defend Peter's authorship. Jeremy Duff I am not familiar with.
@odephraimchai okay this pointless, WHICH Scholars consider it to be written then, making it Pseudepigraphical. Stephen Harris is from the Jesus seminar and no truly respectable Bible scholars will pay him any mind other then his JS friends. Bauckham I have never heard of. You are throwing names out like you popped those off of Wikipedia or some other web page, but regardless of that, your last sentence speaks about people that defend Peter's authorship. Jeremy Duff I am not familiar with.
@odephraimchai nice way of dancing around my direct questions to you with yet another ambiguous number of statements again, which false teachers and how did they create the canon? HMMM? no there are 300 groups of people who all claim that their way of doing things is the right way, not the Biblical way, but their way, its been that way since the first century which is why Jesus, John, Jude and James wrote about false teachers. I won't mention Paul or Peter as you think they are frauds anyway.
@dkarnish Your blasphemy of Yahweh is not a surprise. Yahweh commanded you to listen to him.You are to return to Yahweh as scripture says,not Paul. Yahshua tells us to listen to Yahweh ,not Paul. Yahshua came in His Father's name and you reject him ,Saul who came in the name of Paul you beleive. Paul who claims to be your Father. Paul tells you he is An Apostle because you say he is ,yet your Luke tells us he can not be one. Babyon confusion in your heart.
@odephraimchai Its okay if you don't know the scriptures well enough or have read them enough to be able to give an answer, I fully expected that you didn't, because if you had read the entire new testament you would see that unless you choose to be blind to it. LUKE wrote the Acts in which he tells all about Paul and his ministry, did you miss that little part? HMMMM? No, Jesus lives in my heart, as do his words. You are just like the silly Galatians that Paul wrote an Epistle to, slaves to law
@odephraimchai Jesus never sent his apostles to teach 'Torah'. He sent them out to preach the good news of the Gospel, and what might that good news be?
@odephraimchai I realize now I am dealing with an unlearned person scripturally, which is the reason you, a finite, imperfect person, think that you can earn your way to be with the Father, that you can somehow do greater things by keeping the law then Jesus did on the cross, or that what Jesus did on the cross wasn't enough, didn't cover it all. I am sorry you are so confused but all this happens because you don't read ALL of the scriptures, if you did, you wouldn't be confused.
@dkarnish the conclusion of the matter: Fear Elohim and keep his commandments, this is the whole duty of man.Ecc12:13;Deut 6:2 John saw them ... the witness of Yahshua, and for the word of Elohim, and which had not worshipped [Christianity]. They who obey Elohim's commandments and remain faithful to Yahshua. Rev 14:12;12:17 In the day of affliction, the [Christians] gentiles shall come unto thee from the ends of the earth, and shall say, Surely our fathers have inherited lies... Jeremiah 16:19
@odephraimchai So ODE, are Elohim and Jesus one and the same. Is Jesus God, the Son of God, the only begotten of the Father? Are the Father, Jesus His Son, and the Holy Spirit all God? Are they all equally God? Are they ALL GOD? So what did Jesus accomplish on the cross? What was His purpose for coming here?
@dkarnish Yahshua not Jesus ,Yes Yahshua is elohim,but not Yahweh! “Is it written , ‘I said, you are Elohim? If those to whom the word of Elohim called ‘Elohims’ —scripture cannot be annulled John 10.34-45,Ps 82 whoever does the will of my Father is my brother Matthew 12:50 But I know that you do not have the love of Elohim within you. John 5:42 Father sent me commanded me what to say and how to say it. John 12 49-50I love the Father I do exactly what my Father has commanded me. John 14:31
@odephraimchai Obviously, since Peter wrote it, it would have had to have been written prior to his death, what does that have to do with your statement anyway. Why would the early council member Constantine put together to catalog the canon why did they put in a document that should have been obvious to them to be not authentic? Where is any historical documentation that shows the opposite point of view for the subject of this video. Next you will be telling me that Jesus never really existed
an Catholicism, IF IT ACTUALLY FOLLOWED the bible, woud be true Christianity. True christianity is faint now. before the bible as only in greek and latin, no one could read it but educated peoples, makin it easy for people to just lie about what it meant, or what it said. Satan cant destroy God's Word, so he makes it so no one actually can read it, and if so, lackin the capacty and knowledge to comprehend it
actually, if acts 15 is read correctly, peter confirms that gentiles were distinguished no differently by the Holy Spirit than Jews. also, James stands up, agrees in teh apostle council, and resites Scripture.Acts 15:16-19, then acts 15:23-30 is a direct letter of the apostles to the believers in antioch, syria, cilicia...in reference to galatians...James did disagree at first until Paul confronted peter, and they held the council MENTIONED in acts to decide it out. Paul never lied once
Lord,Please bless your messenger Paul, for onthe day of righteousness and judgement, all will bow there heads to you O Lord Christ Jesus, and even I, with paul, will all hold hands in prayer and worship to you! amen
Catholic, which just means UNIVERSAL, and they are the biggest idol worshiping, legalistic, pagan cult. Why would the Vatican not be called The Church OF Jesus Christ and instead St.peters basilica? and also, according to old testament AND new testament, no one can even become a saint, not until the resurrection of the dead, and new kingdom coming
@Goodtimes1333 since we Catholics are the TRUE church AND the reason that some of the christian sects exist i think that gives us the right to change whatever we see fit .... damn protestants always creating bullshit.
peter himself says..Wherefore also it is contained in the Scripture, Behold, I lay in Sion a chief corner stone, elect, precious; and he that believeth on Him shall not be confounded. Unto you therefore which believe He is preciou: but unto them which be disobedient, the stone which the builders disallowed, the same is made the head of the corner, and, a stone of stumbling, and a ROCK of offence, even to them which stumble at the word, being disobedient: (I Peter 2:4. 6-8)
clearly a highy mentioned character of the gospels, acts...but he is of no more signifiant importance than anyother. "And I say to thee. thou art Peter, and upon this rock I will build my Church, and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it." Matthew 16:18, people quote all the time but why would Jesus say, Ima establich my church based on peter? people forget his name was Simon son of Jonah, Cephas is greek for rock, and
Brothers and sisters, Paul is not a liar. this video uses the books of Acts to accuse Paul or heresy by quoting passages about how "the real apostles" were still Jews, but the writer of Acts was Luke, who then later while traveling with PAUL even states he is with Paul. Luke traveled exclusively with Paul at a certain point and the gospel that Paul taught was Luke's. the first pope was in 400 something AD, and they say even said the pope iwas infallible. Peter was never the first pope, he is
"...God, who knows the heart, testified to them giving them (the Gentiles) the Holy Spirit, just as He also did to us (the Jews); and He made no distinction between us and them, cleansing their hearts by faith. Now therefore why do you put God to the test by placing upon the neck of the disciples a yoke which neither our fathers nor we have been able to bear? But we believe that we are saved through the grace of the Lord Jesus, in the same way as they also are" - Peter (see Acts 15:7-11).
Jesus may God's mercy and blessing be upon him says as recorded in Matthew 5:19:
"Anyone who breaks one of the least of these commandments and teaches others to do the same will be called least in the kingdom of heaven, but whoever practices and teaches these commands will be called great in the kingdom of heaven."
Thus Paul is a liar, what he has built is not what Jesus left behind, and he has always been in direct violation to Jesus' disciples. Bear in mind Disciples are students of Jesus!
So, I get it now, you guys are saying that because Paul said we don't gave to do the Jewish law like Sat. Well you know that we are not Jewish and Peter was acting like a Jew when he was with the Jews?and like a Gentile when he was with the Gentiles? Why is that?
The Apostles and Elders agreed with Paul.Read Acts 15! What did Peter say v6-12 The law was kept perfectly by Christ. And all its penalties against God’s sinful people were poured out on Christ. Therefore, the law is now manifestly not the path to righteousness, Christ is. The ultimate goal of the law is that we would look to Christ, not law-keeping, for our righteousness.
Rom 10:4: For Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to everyone who believes
Too bad you forgot Acts10:9-23 It was PETER who received the revelation Acts 9:34-35 " I now realize how true it is that God does not show favioratism, but accepts men from every nation who fear him and do what is right. Paul was holding Peter to this revelation.
@exposingthemachine Interesting, so you know the birthrates of all these great beings. Could you show me their birth certificates? Not that I'm saying your full of crap or anything but I like to see proof of something before I accept it as fact.
Actually this what you have stated is a true version of the traditional Catholic view on Paul, and that of many evangelicals as well, however I would recommend Paul did not eat pork., a book by derek leeman. When read in context the Paul and james supposed contravery falls to pieces.In reformed theology the Good works of James had a place as well.It results from the in dwelling of the holys spririt.Thus that good works is a results of the Faith that justifies.Hipe that helps
on a side note, i feel that there is indeed something fishy about Paul. it seems to me Jesus would have been more clear if he indeed was the end of the Law. it seems interesting too, that all the instances where these doctrinal changes occurred, i.e. the eating of unclean animals, allowing gentiles into the faith, circumcision not required... why didn't Jesus himself appear to the 12 apostles and tell them this stuff directly instead of choosing a man who had never met him to represent him?
nice video, but in all fairness, acts 10:14 does show that Peter refused to eat things unclean, but if you read the preceeding verse, the voice, (presumably God) tells Peter "rise, slaughter and eat!". next in verse 15, God says, "you stop calling defiled the things God has cleansed.". And if you read on, in verse 28, Peter says, referring apparently to his dream, "God has shown me I should call no man defiled or unclean." Would it be safe to say that Peter changed his mind at this time?
@0:48 - Paul said just the opposite, "Keeping God's commands is what counts" in 1 Corinthians 7:19b
@1:07 - when Paul says "we conclude", he's talking about he and the Twelve and the Holy Spirit! Proof: Acts 15:13-29 - see, it's James himself who delegated that! Romans 3:28? read on to verse 31 :|
The people that are spreading this ought to be ashamed of themselves for not only causing divisions among believers, but especially of Christ's emissaries - do they want them to judge them?
@krononomikon but Paul did not say Jews shouldn't observe the Law, but "let him who is circumcised(Jewish) not become uncircumcised(Gentile), and let him who is uncircumcised not become circumcised" as far as salvation goes. Why? Going back to Peter being kosher, that's good! But even since the order of the Law, in Leviticus it alludes to the unkosher animals being symbolic of Gentiles and their abominable practices (idols). Even though Israel HAD the Torah, they were not justified by it...
@krononomikon ...such as in places in Ezekiel 23, where they were rebuked for letting the unclean practices of the Gentiles (idols and sacrificing children) into them, as a whore lets a stranger into her husband's bed! THAT is why Paul is saying that faith matters, and not "keeping the works of the Law", because otherwise he'd be against himself saying keeping God's commands are what counts. No, but one can pretend to be lawful while doing it as a show, but being inwardly greedy and covetous
So the billions upon billions of years the Word was with YHWH and thus becoming a trust and reliance was soon to be replaced by another called, faith....
So all those yrs the Word was made manifest into the form of Yahushua was incorrect you say? I say, NOT!!!
Yahushua lived Torah and that's howcome His path is narrow. Paul opened it up to anything goes mentality...grace of Paul the self appointed apostle.
Jesus was the Messiah and he did come to save the Jews but he also came for the gentiles which many Jews rejected.
Jesus did not say not to follow the Torah. Matthew 5:17
Peter was given the vision to break with some of the old testament doctrines but not all. Some of these things God didn't want the people to do anymore, like the barbaric practice of circumcision. The disciples themselves were confused about these things at first and there were arguments and divisions.
@PMnews1 Ending circumcision is Pauline doctrine in Galatians 5:2 instead of by Peter. Please read your Bible properly by citing its pertinent verse, dude!!!
@saidinmas Circumcision was a satanic blood ritual that comes from Egypt originally. Its kind of like branding your cattle. It can be used as an initiation rite to prove your loyalty to a cause but done to unwilling infants is barbaric. Many things were allowed in the old testament that were not necessarily the will of God.
(Mark 10 4:5)
On circumcision it was more than just Paul (Acts 15: 1-2, 7, 10) so did Peter.
@PMnews1 What's wrong with you, dude? Even Jesus himself was circumcised as an ethnic Jew who followed the Abrahamic tradition of circumcision. Paul compromised Jesus' teaching with the gentiles, coz Jesus was sent to the Jews only in See Matthew 15:24, Matthew 1:21, and Matthew 5:17-18.
@saidinmas I believe Jesus had to downplay things a bit because these Jews are so arrogant and supremacist in their beliefs. Like the woman at the well. His disciples were shocked he would talk to a "heathen" non-Jew. Later he told the story of the good Samaritan to try and mellow them out a bit. I believe it was always Jesus's plan to teach the non-Jews but had to start with the Jews has part of God's contract. Circumcision they picked up from Egypt, kind of like like branding your cattle.
@PMnews1 Why don't you read your Bible properly to discover that Abraham and Jesus were both circumcised, and that Jesus were sent to the Israelites only in Matthew 15:24 & 1:21, BUT Paul screwed up Jesus' teaching by preaching to the Gentiles and abolishing circumcision in Gal 5:2.
@saidinmas I have read the bible and know it better than most pastors and priests do. I know the bible says Jesus and Abraham were circumcised but that doesn't mean its right. I don't believe everything in the bible is necessarily right nor do I believe everything has been properly translated. The Jews got circumcision from the Egyptians and it was kind of like branding your cattle, they usually did it to slaves. As I understand but it was also a form of blood magic which is evil!
@PMnews1 Yes, circumcision is an Abrahamic tradition, and Abraham was never among the slaves who were circumcised in ancient Egypt as the correct and indisputable historical fact. The Egyptian slaves in referring to the Israelites under Moses were long time after Abraham. Moses was circumcised and was never a slave there, coz he was adopted and brought up in Pharoah's palace.
@Ni1234ckA Pauline Christianity= Forget all the teachings of the Tanakh because you're saved by faith. Ok, I'm gonna do whatever I want. At least Muslims understand the Torah better than Christians.
@ChildofYeshua777 back that statement up by new testament scripture please. and would you please be so kind as to explain EXACTLY what you mean by TORAH? As a Christian saved by the loving, kind gift of God's grace through His Son Jesus (Yeshua) by His death on the cross and His resurrection three days later SCRIPTURE, the WORD who is JESUS, is my highest and final authority in these matters, so your gonna have to provide something to back your statements up. Otherwise your statement is hot air.
@dkarnish Mattiyahu 5:17 and Acts 15 introduced the Gentiles to the Noahide laws. Also the book of Ya'akov (James) says faith w/o works is dead. Saying all we have to do is believe in "Jesus" and all is cool in YHVH's eyes in a free license to sin.
@ChildofYeshua777 oh now we get to the truth, the noahide laws. And you seriously lack the understanding of what James was saying, which is in agreement with Jesus and with John who both said you will know a person by their fruit, which is what James was speaking about. If a person says they have faith and there is no fruit then they really don't have the faith they claim to. Paul covered the whole free to sin part in Romans very well, he explained that to live in Christ is to be dead to sin.
@ChildofYeshua777 oh and no, matthew 5:17 and Acts 15 did nothing of the sort, have you even read both of them? And like I told 'ODEPHRAIMCHAI' earlier, Luke, who wasn't an apostle, wrote both the Gospel of Luke AND THE BOOK OF ACTS. which tells all about Saul's conversion and ministry. If you believe Luke wrote correctly, and he is the author of both, then your denying scripture, because LUKE obviously saw no issue with any anything against Saul/Paul. Your only argument is to attack scripture.
@ChildofYeshua777 oh and no, matthew 5:17 and Acts 15 did nothing of the sort, have you even read both of them? And like I told 'ODEPHRAIMCHAI' earlier, Luke, who wasn't an apostle, wrote both the Gospel of Luke AND THE BOOK OF ACTS. which tells all about Saul's conversion and ministry. If you believe Luke wrote correctly, and he is the author of both, then your denying scripture, because LUKE obviously saw no issue with any anything against Saul/Paul. Your only argument is to attack scripture.
@PMnews1 Unlike Peter and others who saw Jesus, Paul who innovated differently from Jesus' teaching never saw Jesus' face at all as a matter of indisputable fact in Bible LOL!!!
Fail, Paul was referring to the sacrificial law in romans 3:28. Paul was a Torah observing Jew like the others, If you have read the whole bible then you would know that Moses was given two laws, commands and animal sacrificial law. The only law that became obsolete was the sacrificial law because Jesus was the sacrifice
0:24 Jesus as God? The verses in the book of Acts which tells this tale, says nothing about Jesus as God or Paul thinking such a thing. THAT little concept was a later invention and creation by Europeans. And it spread like wild fire. More like fungus or the borg in Star Trek.
the Lord Jesus spoke and the world was created. did you not read in the book of Colossians where it says that "by Him ALL THINGS WERE CREATED", what do you think that means?
If Paul relied on Jesus' disciples for info, then where is the chain of narrators tracing back to Jesus' disciples. Remember that Christian scholars on the history of Christianity do acknowledge that the 4 gospels were written by those whose surnames or last names were unknown or multiple anonymous authors, when in fact Jesus' disciples must have last names that those anonymous gospel writers did NOT know them as a matter of fact.
The Apostle Peter opposed the Judaizers by reporting on how God poured out His Holy Spirit on the gentiles: “So God, who knows the heart, acknowledged them by giving them the Holy Spirit, just as He did to us, and made no distinction between us and them, purifying their hearts by faith.
Paul the Tarsus is not the same in the eyes of Nazarene, which are Christians according to modern definition and non-Christians according to early church father's definition.
You are mentioning the majority view. According to us, your message is biased.
@TheSatanwarrior read your page, interesting, funny, historically inaccurate. The catholic church is not the root of Christianity, far from it in fact, but yes they are controlled very much by secret and not so secret societies these days. For someone who claims to have knowledge, shouldn't you be aware then that Judaism in it's modern form is really kabbalah? Islam was really a product of catholic invention and influence. Also, what proof do you offer that Jesus never really existed? Thanks.
@buzzobug There Is one separate God one Separate "messiah" Oh Lord Israel out lord is one. He never claimed to be god and admitted he was lesser than god so therefore NOT EGUAL! Paul Brought Paganism to the area and the Trinity is pure Pagan Godheads! You need to read all the missing texts and the Original King James has 60,000 KNOWN mistakes it's a Unholy Document! Paul was the Antichrist and the scriptures say he was present at the time of the New Testament writings already!
@MrsKevinsmith , sorry but if you read in the NT. Jesus claims to be God. like in the book of John where He claims to be "I AM" a Jew would never claim that. as they would know what they were saying , What did God say to Moses? Jesus is God just as he claimed and you can not believe just as so many of the Jews it says refused to believe. But there was some who did, and it is said the first 100,000 of the New Christians where Jews converts. They did believe in the Jewish Messiah
@buzzobug God never said to Moses that he's Jesus in OT, coz the name Jesus is in NT after instead of before his birth. Did God wear diapers and change diapers with his miraculous power? Absolutely never unless you beg to differ and deny the fact of life.
@saidinmas , hmmm have you read the OT or Nt? Because if you read in book of John , what does it say in 1st chapter? go read , Jesus Is LORD. , the facts remain that Jesus is God , and that one day He is going to return just as He said. and that is at the last day , just as he says., book of John. And all will rise then . The redeemed to eternal life with Him forever and those who have rejected Him to eternal damnation. I am one of the redeemed.
@buzzobug reads in a book of John that Jesus is God "his only begotten son" in John 3:16, then - What is the name of God whose begotten son is Jesus???
@saidinmas , John - Chapter one "in the beginning was the Word and the Word was with God and the Word was God. He was in the beginning with God, now to Verse 14, And the Word became flesh and dwelt amont us and we beheld His glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father, full of grace and truth.
book of Colossians. chapter 1, verse 15, He is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation. , 16, for by Him all things were created that are in heaven and.......
@buzzobug needs to compare with Matthew1:18 that Jesus is child of the Holy Spirit who did "come upon" Mary like a male animal does "come upon" a female animal to beget instead of the only begotten of the Father.
Christian scholars acknowledge of NOT knowing the surnames or last names for Mark, Matthew, Luke, and John to establish a chain of narration tracing back to the original disciples who saw and heard from Jesus; they also acknowledge that Paul never saw Jesus' face at all.
@buzzobug By the way, the term "come upon" is from Luke 1:35 instead of from me.
Moreover, John 1:14 about the "Word" is its personal pronoun is "It" instead of "He". Therefore, the "Word" cannot refer to a person or man according to the rules of the English grammar.
@saidinmas , do you not read and see that the 1st chapter of the book of John is about the Word and that means the Lord Jesus is the Word. He spoke and the universe was created. He is the Creator. God the Son. , as i wrote, book of Colossians. C-1 verse 16a, For by Him ALL THINGS WERE CREATED...... in the book of Titus, C-2 verse 13, "lookijg for th eblessed hope and glorious appearing of our great God and Saviour Jesus Christ"....
@saidinmas , book of John , C-1, verse 14, "and the Wordbecame flesh and welt among us, and we beheld His glory as of the only begotten of the Father, full of grace and truth. tell me do you see were it says that the Word became "FLESH", show me were a "IT" BECOMES FLESH" the Bible is quite clear and that the Lord Jesus came in the flesh and He is God and the only REDEEMER of mankind. and i one day am going to see Him face to face and there serve my God forever.
@saidinmas His name was John bar Zebedee because he was the son of Zebedee. Most Jews did not have surnames at the time. The fact that you don't know that makes my head spin...HONESTLY...
@Rogueoftroy Where does the Bible say "John bar Zebedee"?
Would you deny Jesus' surname i.e Jesus son of Mary?
coz Christian scholars claim that child Jesus is 'conceived' by the Holy Spirit instead of by the Father.
See Matt 1:18 where child Jesus is of the Holy Spirit instead of the Father. So, -Why would Jesus invoke the Father instead of the Holy Spirit in Bible?
@saidinmas It doesn't say John bar Zebedee. But it does say that Zebedee is John's father. There is no real point in you arguing the point. It's not debate. It's just a fact of history that that is how names were rendered in Israel at that point in history. And no, Jesus would have been Jesus bar Joseph, as Joseph was His legal father (of course all these names would be in their Hebraic forms). And your point about the Holy Spirit is moot. It does not change the relationship btw Son and Father.
@saidinmas The Bible said John's father was Zebedee. So his name was John bar Zebedee. That's how names worked. If you are actually arguing with that point, you are straight-up retarded. And no, your point about Luke is wrong. The Holy Spirit is named as the mechanism by which Mary conceived. But the father/son relationship is still with the Father and the Son. Arguing with that also indicates retardation. And reading so much into that text that is contrary to other texts is just ridiculous.
@Rogueoftroy stated "The Holy Spirit (any male animal) is named as the mechanism by which Mary (a female animal) conceived." To be specific in Luke 1:35 where the Holy Spirt did "come upon" Mary like a male animal does "come upon" a female animal in the begetting.
Why were the gospels in Greek instead of in Aramaic, the mother-tongue language of Jesus and disciples?
coz Christian scholars admit the Bible was written by anonymous authors in Greek.
@saidinmas Your "point" about Mary is so stupid I can't even believe you are serious. And as for Greek...it was the universal language. DUH. And the fact that you found a few Christian scholars who say that authorship was added later does not mean that the vast majority do no disagree. You are the stupidest person I've talked to on here in a long time (and that's saying something). Talking to you is pointless.
@Rogueoftroy makes Your "point" about Mary is so stupid I can't even believe you. And as for Greek...it was FALSELY the universal language COZ JESUS AND DISCIPLES USED ARAMAIC . DUH. And the fact that you found a few Christian scholars who say that authorship was added later does not mean that the vast majority do no disagree WITH THE CHANGES IN BIBLE VERSIONS. You are the stupidest person I've talked to on here in a long time (and that's saying something). Talking to you is pointless.
there is no such thing as KOSHER food in GODS eyes unless its fruits and vegetables GENESIS 1:29 CHRIST is VEGAN and you MEAT eaters better get that through your HEADS whether your so-called christian or sinner JESUS will not come BACK for this or any MURDERING MEAT EATING so -called church NEVER HAPPEN essene gospel of peace
healthyone100 20 hours ago
Typical of the heretics who attack Saint Paul .
ComradeAgopian 2 weeks ago
Non believers are "carnal" and the carnal man can't understand the spiritual man.
brazilian777able 4 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Saul - Shaul - Sha'ul - pronounced 'Shaw-ool'
Fox - Shual - Shu'al - pronounced 'Shoo-awl'
.
Saul of Tarsus - Saul (Agrippa)
Apostle Paul (Agrippa)
Born Feet First
A Bad Omen
Born Tail 1st
{Act 7:58 }
ForbiddenResearch 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
2 Peter 3:15-16 and consider that the longsuffering of our Lord is salvation--as also our beloved brother Paul, according to the wisdom given to him, has written to you, as also in all his epistles, speaking in them of these things, in which are some things hard to understand, which untaught and unstable people twist to their own destruction, as they do also the rest of the Scriptures.
ShilohReigns 1 month ago
some really good stuff here
willbirful 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
There are mutitudes of scriptural proof that Paul (or whomever made letters available to the council of Rome) made subtle changes to Christ's teachings. I will be more than happy to post a dozen or more for you, if you have not found them already. But the most obvious proof is that Paul declared himself a preacher and founded churches. Christ said to NEVER be a Rabbi and notice He told His disciples to travel through all the cities of Israel until His return (Mat. 10;23). Ergo, NO CHURCHES.
themanningsjdsjjj 1 month ago
I like. Christian"s seem to forget or ignore that both Peter and Paul were Jews
1Tiqvah 1 month ago
@dallasjewboy. I am amazed by your video. It is incorrect in a number of very important respects.
CleanItUpMan99 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
2 Peter 3:15-16 and consider that the longsuffering of our Lord is salvation--as also our beloved brother Paul, according to the wisdom given to him, has written to you, as also in all his epistles, speaking in them of these things, in which are some things hard to understand, which untaught and unstable people twist to their own destruction, as they do also the rest of the Scriptures.
ShilohReigns 1 month ago
Step into my office....why?.....cause you're fired!
MrBuster128 1 month ago
Paul Paul Paul!!
MrBuster128 1 month ago
You have already lied about Paul by producing this white image. Therefore, don't care to hear what you have to say.
sourheartroasie 1 month ago
Paul is the Fictional Persona's of Titus Flavius Josephus, his son Justus and Pliny the Younger
thone2008 2 months ago
how can paul be rabbi's gamliel follower if gamliel lived 170 earlier to jesus lifespam
SAMIRERRE 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Paul was knocked to the ground and blinded because he saw the glorified Jesus from heaven.That is enough to make him an apostle.
If you want to learn about Jesus,the christian way and Paul click the link on my channel.
Garrison5402 2 months ago
Jesus broke the Mosaic law on many occasions (healing during the Sabbath, eating with the "unclean", talking to a prostitute, abolishing Kashrut, abolishing stoning, claiming to be the son of God).
chemerich 3 months ago
I don't believe that we are judged on the look of our penis or on what we eat or on what we do on a particular day of the week. We are solely judged on our ability to love our neighbor as ourselves and on how we treat the earth and its living beings.
chemerich 3 months ago
Saint Paul prepared the Saints to enter a Timeless era, without the Law in vogue and without knowing what time it was. the destruction of the Temple makes Jewish impossible to keep, since only the High Priest could set the days of the week, and those days of the Jewish Law did not match the days of the Roman Calendar, and so the Judaism is a farce, a fraud, using the Roman Saturdays as if that were the Sabbath Day, when it is not any such day. Jesus said "No man would know the day or hour"
CarmineFragione 3 months ago
The Jews do not keep the Law, since they worship on Saturdays according to the Roman Calendar while the Jewish Calendar is required by the Law of Moses to be affixed anew every 49 years. And so the variations of mismatching the Jewish Law to the Roman days we count, is not the Law of Moses, the real Sabbath Seventh Day is unknown, or falling on Tuesdays, if the Jews were keeping Sabbath Law. So all claims of Jews are false Judaizing, they cannot know what day or hour it is, to Worship.
CarmineFragione 3 months ago
Observing Kashrut and Circumcision are works of the flesh (sin). These works don't provide any spiritual meaning and they cause unnecessary sufferings.
chemerich 3 months ago
Jesus was telling us himself that following guidlines (Laws) does not make you righteous. Matt. 15:11. Not that which goeth into the mouth defileth a man; but that which cometh out of the mouth, this defileth a man. God searches the heart. He sees through everything. The Jewish people were being led by "The Synagogue of Satan", Christ came to set things straight, and that he did! :)
BLEEVEJOHN316 3 months ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
i put things in proper context paul paid for peter. paul is to be shielded and humanity will support paul while he is the underdog the rivers of humanity will stand with him. all wickedness shall flee him as he is to be delivered the torch and be sealed.
daggertoungeomega 3 months ago
Saint Paul was strict with himself in his own Jewish Worship , but for the Gentiles, the Revelation of God is that what is given to the gentiles as a Gift of Grace, cannot be concluded as a Law , it begins as Grace and continues forever as Grace. The Law given to the Jews is a Bond , a business between God and the Jews, that is not meant to then Judaize the world into submission, which if submission , then becomes Islam, not Judaism. Paul taught the Christians to be Children , not Adults.
CarmineFragione 3 months ago
Imagine the Father, as a Rabbi , teaching a mature son , about to Bar Mitzvah. Would the Father not be strict and somber about the duty ? But if the Father has little children also around, while Father is being tough on the young man, Father is winking the eye at the kids and the same person who must be Rabbi to the mature son , is entirely in the right, to let the kids play with his beard and call him "Santa Claus" or the "Devil" if that is what the kids do as their innocent play.
CarmineFragione 3 months ago
When a Jew comes forward to say this or that is the "Real Truth" ??? Does he not know the Law ? To presume yourself to be the Prophet of God, to declare of yourself the Truth , makes you come into Judgment with God Himself. As for Paul, he was born a Jew and was observant of the Law, but the Law itself does not bind Gentiles, and so Paul as the Apostle to the Gentiles is under Grace, not Law. So, God to the Jews is a strict Rabbi , but to Gentiles, God can be Santa Claus.
CarmineFragione 3 months ago
Answer this, If those Christian Jews who according to this video states that the original 12 apostles that knew Jesus believed that they also had to keep following the Torah, where is it ever recorded in their entire testimony (New Testament) of them ever again, offering up animal sacrifices for sin atonement??
Fact is, they didn't having understanding that the offering up of Jesus Christ on the cross and His blood shed is the FULFILLMENT of all the Mosaic Law and it's sacrifices forever!
HiJacked41 4 months ago
Paul is evidently a threat to both Islam & the heretics of true Christianity, aka the Roman Pagan er... Catholic institution, as he is always singled out because of his teaching & "strong" doctrine that goes deeper to the real core of salvation in Jesus Christ alone by faith without the external acts of circumcision and he was also the one, who being taught by Jesus Christ exclusively on Mt. Sinai for 3 years, received the revelation of the "rapture" of the Bride of Christ. Satan hates Paul!
HiJacked41 4 months ago
@HiJacked41 You have lost your mind.
Lindemann04109 4 months ago
@Lindemann04109 - Because.......? To the religious Jews, Jesus Christ is a stumblingblock and offensive, fulfilling both the warning that Moses spoke of as well as the varied prophets of God who prophesied that it would be so because of the unrepentant hardness of their hearts toward the Spiritual nature of God's grace toward ALL mankind. So He has blinded their eyes and their ears are deaf in part accordingly to His eternal plan to bring salvation to gentile believers through faith in Christ!
HiJacked41 4 months ago
This has got to be the most pathetic attempt to discredit Paul I have ever seen. Almost every single verse this video provides is horribly mistranslated.
JLSpencer1611 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Deuteronomy 32:6 Moses asks the Jews " Is not God your Father, your Creator?" So how can Divine God the Eternal be then Eternal as Father, if God the Eternal Father has not a Son who has standing in God as One ? the Messiah is Divine. The Dead Sea Scrolls in Psalms 110 defies the false Jewish version, to show Messiah is Divine " Adonai said to my Adonai" not as the false Jews say Adonai to my adoni. They perverted the text of Torah with a little leaven to leaven the whole lump.
CarmineFragione 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
As for truth , the Oracle of the Arabian Sorcerer, Balaam, who cursed Israel, and so Moses later killed that false prophet. Yet the Jews rely on his oracle that God cannot be a man, so the Jews hate God, that Moses killed their Arabian Prophet, whom they served, instead of God. Exodus 4:16, God Yahweh says to Moses. " You will be as Yahweh God to the man" Thus God gives Himself , Face to Face, to be Father and Son, even with Moses, Moses was God to the People. 3=1
CarmineFragione 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
When it is said " It is Written" that is a Divine Oracle. Now, who was there at Mount Moriah ? There was a father named Abraham, with his son named Isaac and then the Holy Spirit came to spare the father, his only son. How many times must the story be told to see , this is the Trinity, the Father, The Son, The Holy Ghost, assembled in the Unity , to offer the Sacrifice which justifies God Himself, not the man. Three assembled in God's Name, is still God who is One. 3=1
CarmineFragione 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
How can there be a "real truth" , either there is Truth, or there is no such thing. So to say "real truth" brings into question if the notion has any truth at all. God as the Truth is Self Evident. Saint Paul is who he is, by God the History of Mankind is guarded over by God Himself. How can anyone then offer us a "real truth" ??? If God is not Author and Actor of all that there is, then God is nothing . Saint Paul is the Truth that God has presented in History.
CarmineFragione 4 months ago
What did James say about gentile converts? they didn't have to keep the Mosaic law ...
Act 15:13 ...James answered, saying...
Act 15:25 It seemed good unto us and the Holy Ghost...to send ... with our beloved Barnabas and Paul
Act 15:28 For it seemed good ... to lay upon you no greater burden than these necessary thing
Act 21:25 ouching the Gentiles which believe, we have written and concluded that they observe no such thing
The apostles + the Holy Ghost agree.. the law is unnecessary
nicerperson 4 months ago
Paul stopped persecuting the Natsarim for uttering the Name, and became a Natsari (Acts 24:5), in fact, a "ringleader" of that sect. Was Luke also a heretic for travelling with him? Paul said we "establish" the Torah.
LewWhite10 4 months ago
NO Jew has kept the whole LAW !except Jesus. SO how do you propose to do it this time?
buddy85442 4 months ago
What did Jesus accomplish on the cross? He died for our sins folks even yours! And thank God He did! Dont listen to these men on youtube these blasphemers of God and His saints! Please read the bible for yourselves and let God speak to your hearts!!
babyRoses7 5 months ago
easiest way to expose paul: 2 timothy 1:15 "This you know, that ALL those in ASIA have turned away from me." It's ludicrus that Christianity does sermons on being the church of philadelphia or thyatira, ephesus, etc, when these are the churches in ASIA that Yeshua sent his letters to, and commended Ephesus for denouncing Paul. The Jews in Acts that wanted to kill Paul were from ASIA. You'd think a clergymen who dedicates their life to scripture would pick it up, are they without excuse?
Phaedron777 5 months ago
@Phaedron777 Can you clarify the [letters] Yeshua sent commending Ephesus for denouncing Paul?
buddy85442 4 months ago
@Phaedron777 Another good way to expose Paul is to ask this question. What do Paul and Jezebel (Revelation 2:20) have in common? Answer: They both misled Jesus' servants into eating food sacrificed to idols.(1 Corinthians Ch 8-10).PS The 15 talents are 15 kingdom parables, keep your eye on the scribe Mat. 13:52, the eye is the lamp of the body! God bless. The last will be first and the first will be last, The parable of the talents reveals that we are the farmers that sow the seed
RyanCreated 1 month ago
from the time ancient ,puranic times ,there may be mistakes of ONE OR TWO PERSONS .mistakes would have been due to bad wisedom ,bad thoughts ,wrong decessions or bad fate and which made sinner and sinner and could not come out of sins . due to that others also became victims .at those times itself some wise peoples would have taken proper steps for betterment of others .that mistakes should not be repeated .there would have been no bad happenings..
bgupta2001 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
ABOUT THE LUXIFER PROPHECY IN ISAIAH CHAPTER 14:
In Case Christians Havent Noticed - The "Heights" of The Bible
Are The New Testament And There You Will Find The Angel
of Satans Presence Seated In St.Paul And Among Many Other
Things Teaching Christians To Call The Blessed Christ A Curse.
(Galatians 3:13)
44AlphaMale44 5 months ago
That was the biggest load of crock I have ever heard. Do people really eat that shit up. O I say something so it must be true.
TheSatanwarrior 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I"m one of the two witnesses in the book of Revelation. God said I'm the prophet and the Law of Moses, its called the Law and The prophets. If you want to read my prophesies follow me on twitter. @yaaofoah2002. Theresa Peprah
nboachie4 5 months ago
Occultists are always trying to split St Paul off from Jesus. Divide et impera, eh, chaps? This only fools people who don't know their Bible. Even in the Old Testament, it was declare that the Messiah would be a 'light to lighten the Gentiles' (Isiah 42, echoed in Luke 2)
ruthamyallan1 5 months ago
This is nothing new, its just the same way many others have done their best to try to instill doubt to untrained people about the reliability of what the Holy Spirit inspired the writers of the New Testament scriptures to put down. Jesus said "I haven't come to abolish the law, but to fulfill it". And if dallasjewishboy can get people to doubt about what Paul wrote then he can get people to question the rest of the New Testament as well. He is only banking on people not knowing better. WRONG!!!!
dkarnish 5 months ago
In reality, it's the Hasidic, ashkenzi(European Khazaria Caucasian ancestry ) jews who have dropped the real Torah in favor of the teaching of the rabbis in the Talmud. They place higher authority in the rabbis commentaries then they do the Scriptures penned by Moses and the prophets themselves. dallasjewishboy doesn't even mention any of these facts in this video, but he will post his views on what he twists out of the scriptures about what Paul says about real relationship with God thru Jesus
dkarnish 5 months ago
In Acts 5:17 the high priest and his friends, who were Sadducees (Can't get more Jewish then this I would say) reacted with violent jealousy and arrested the apostles and put them in jail, FOR PERFORMING MIRACLES AND SIGNS AND WONDERS AMONG THE PEOPLE, JUST LIKE JESUS, WHOM THEY PUT TO DEATH DID. Is there a correlation here? Paul NEVER dropped the Torah, in Acts 17:3 Paul interpreted the SCRIPTURES to the Thessalonians and in Berea the jews searched the scriptures daily to verify what Paul said!
dkarnish 5 months ago
He also seems to forget that in Acts 11:1-18 the apostle Peter , after the conversion of Cornelius and his entire family, went to Jerusalem to explain to the other apostles that God had also granted Gentile the privilege of turning from sin and receiving eternal life. The Apostles didn't see themselves as Jews. THEY WERE JEWS!!! The persecution of the early Church came to jewish believers before Saul was ever converted, and that persecution came by way of other Jews. Obviously you didn't read it
dkarnish 5 months ago
Funny that dallasjewishboy relates Saul's encounter with the risen Jesus as a 'mind-altering experience'. Lets see what the definition of that is... Adj. 1. mind-altering - producing mood changes or distorted perception; "hallucinogenic drugs are mind-altering substances"
psychoactive, psychotropic - affecting the mind or mood or other mental processes; "psychoactive drugs". It is obvious and clear that he sees Saul's personal experience with Jesus as just some type of distorted perception.
dkarnish 5 months ago
Paul stated that it was the Law that clearly showed him his need for Savior from the requirements of the Law that he could never, ever keep, and the Law also showed him his desire to sin, again showing that it was impossible for him or anyone else to satisfy the requirement of the Law, therefore the Father, rich in love and mercy sent His only begotten, perfect Son, Jesus to give his perfect life as payment to fulfill it. Paul also stated that through faith in Christ there is no Jew or gentile
dkarnish 5 months ago
Obviously dallasjewishboy is leaving out quite a bit about Judaism that he doesn't want to make known in his video. What is even more interesting is that is his twisted words he forget that Paul stated in Romans 7:12 But still, the law itself is holy right and good. As well as Romans 10:4 For Christ has already accomplished the purpose for which the law was given. As a result, all who believe in him are made right with God. Paul clearly stated that God gave the law to show man how sinful he was
dkarnish 5 months ago
Judaism in many areas defines 'Torah' as not just the established Hebrew Bible but also the Talmud with all of the Mischnah & Gemarah which it considers more important than the scriptures themselves as show in statements like 'My son, give heed to the words of the scribes rather that the words of the law'. Or Sanhedrin X, 3 f.88b 'he who transgresses the words of the scribes sins more gravely than the transgressors of the words of the law.' How can you trust those who believe men over scripture?
dkarnish 5 months ago
2 Peter 3:15-16 This is just as our beloved brother Paul wrote to you with the wisdom God gave him - speaking of these things in all of his letters. Some of his comments are hard to understand, and those who are IGNORANT and UNSTABLE have TWISTED his letters around to mean something quite different from what he meant, JUST AS THEY DO OTHER PARTS OF SCRIPTURE - and the result is disaster for them. Peter clearly places Paul's writings on the same level as already establishes scripture.
dkarnish 5 months ago
The reason there are no letters to Paul from the real Apostle of Yahshua is they would not have anything to do with Paul the twister of truth. AS the essence Church proves with Paul's words to Timothy ,All yes All in Asia have reject me as an Apostle.And, how did they know Paul was a lair,Paul never met Yahshua or knew him .As Paul told us. Only 14 people ever met the test of an Apostle and Paul failed that test.That is why Paul said I am one because you say I am one. Paul lies!!!
odephraimchai 5 months ago
@odephraimchai 2 Peter 3:15-16 This is just as our beloved brother Paul wrote to you with the wisdom God gave him - speaking of these things in all of his letters. Some of his comments are hard to understand, and those who are IGNORANT and UNSTABLE have TWISTED his letters around to mean something quite different from what he meant, JUST AS THEY DO OTHER PARTS OF SCRIPTURE - and the result is disaster for them. Paul did meet the risen Jesus, on the road to Damascus. Scripture proves you wrong.
dkarnish 5 months ago
@dkarnish cow dung!!! Although 2 Peter internally purports to be a work of the apostle, most biblical scholars have concluded that Peter is not the author and consider the epistle pseudepigraphical.[3] Reasons for this include its linguistic differences from 1 Peter, its apparent use of Jude, possible allusions to 2nd-century gnosticism, encouragement in the wake of a delayed parousia, and weak external support.[4]
odephraimchai 5 months ago
@odephraimchai WHAT BIBLICAL scholars mind you? I hear that statement ALL the time, why don't you name a few of these scholars? Let me guess, how may of them sit on the Jesus seminar? And show me a position from any scholar older than twenty five years that states that 2 Peter was part of the canon from the original council. please don't repeat googled info from recent webpages, state proof, not conjecture. There is your cow dung. Don't make me start listing scholars and texts on your baloney.
dkarnish 5 months ago
@odephraimchai I will trust the words of the original canon that was placed together by those that were 1600 years closer to the source material ANY DAY over the modern scholars who have tenure to collect and book deals to get signed due to their controversial nature. Instead of google-ing to back up your point, why don't you point out, using the rest of the canon, where the 2 Epistle of Peter is contradictory in any way? Scripture is the best commentary on Scripture, use it to prove your point.
dkarnish 5 months ago
@dkarnish The original canon are crab created by false teachers ,with over 300 different christian churches which can not agree upon the same god they created! LOL The questions of authorship and date are closely related. Self-evidently if Peter the Apostle wrote this epistle then it must have been written prior to his death in c 65–67AD. The letter refers to the Pauline epistles and so must post-date them, regardless of authorship, thus a date before 60 is not probable. cont.
odephraimchai 5 months ago
@odephraimchai Many scholars consider the epistle to be written c 100–150AD and so contend that it is pseudepigraphical. The argument for a late date see Harris. For a 'middle date' see Bauckham who opts for a date between 80–90AD as most probable. For an early date and (usually) for a defense of the Apostle Peter's authorship see Kruger, Zahn,Spitta, Bigg, and Green. Jeremy Duff argues that the various strands of evidence "point towards the period 60–130 CE, to favour 80–90 CE.
odephraimchai 5 months ago
@odephraimchai okay this pointless, WHICH Scholars consider it to be written then, making it Pseudepigraphical. Stephen Harris is from the Jesus seminar and no truly respectable Bible scholars will pay him any mind other then his JS friends. Bauckham I have never heard of. You are throwing names out like you popped those off of Wikipedia or some other web page, but regardless of that, your last sentence speaks about people that defend Peter's authorship. Jeremy Duff I am not familiar with.
dkarnish 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@odephraimchai okay this pointless, WHICH Scholars consider it to be written then, making it Pseudepigraphical. Stephen Harris is from the Jesus seminar and no truly respectable Bible scholars will pay him any mind other then his JS friends. Bauckham I have never heard of. You are throwing names out like you popped those off of Wikipedia or some other web page, but regardless of that, your last sentence speaks about people that defend Peter's authorship. Jeremy Duff I am not familiar with.
dkarnish 5 months ago
@odephraimchai nice way of dancing around my direct questions to you with yet another ambiguous number of statements again, which false teachers and how did they create the canon? HMMM? no there are 300 groups of people who all claim that their way of doing things is the right way, not the Biblical way, but their way, its been that way since the first century which is why Jesus, John, Jude and James wrote about false teachers. I won't mention Paul or Peter as you think they are frauds anyway.
dkarnish 5 months ago
@dkarnish Your blasphemy of Yahweh is not a surprise. Yahweh commanded you to listen to him.You are to return to Yahweh as scripture says,not Paul. Yahshua tells us to listen to Yahweh ,not Paul. Yahshua came in His Father's name and you reject him ,Saul who came in the name of Paul you beleive. Paul who claims to be your Father. Paul tells you he is An Apostle because you say he is ,yet your Luke tells us he can not be one. Babyon confusion in your heart.
odephraimchai 5 months ago
@odephraimchai Its okay if you don't know the scriptures well enough or have read them enough to be able to give an answer, I fully expected that you didn't, because if you had read the entire new testament you would see that unless you choose to be blind to it. LUKE wrote the Acts in which he tells all about Paul and his ministry, did you miss that little part? HMMMM? No, Jesus lives in my heart, as do his words. You are just like the silly Galatians that Paul wrote an Epistle to, slaves to law
dkarnish 5 months ago
@dkarnish Who cares,Dr Luke the hearsay prophet never met the real Apostles or Yahshua the messiah.
The acts of luke and the letters of Luke are second dumbdown gospels ,they are not Scripture.
Torah which Yahshua lived and taught. Luke the disciples of Paul is disqualify as a witness for Paul.
Silly Tare
odephraimchai 5 months ago
@odephraimchai Jesus never sent his apostles to teach 'Torah'. He sent them out to preach the good news of the Gospel, and what might that good news be?
dkarnish 5 months ago
@odephraimchai I realize now I am dealing with an unlearned person scripturally, which is the reason you, a finite, imperfect person, think that you can earn your way to be with the Father, that you can somehow do greater things by keeping the law then Jesus did on the cross, or that what Jesus did on the cross wasn't enough, didn't cover it all. I am sorry you are so confused but all this happens because you don't read ALL of the scriptures, if you did, you wouldn't be confused.
dkarnish 5 months ago
@dkarnish the conclusion of the matter: Fear Elohim and keep his commandments, this is the whole duty of man.Ecc12:13;Deut 6:2 John saw them ... the witness of Yahshua, and for the word of Elohim, and which had not worshipped [Christianity]. They who obey Elohim's commandments and remain faithful to Yahshua. Rev 14:12;12:17 In the day of affliction, the [Christians] gentiles shall come unto thee from the ends of the earth, and shall say, Surely our fathers have inherited lies... Jeremiah 16:19
odephraimchai 5 months ago
@odephraimchai So ODE, are Elohim and Jesus one and the same. Is Jesus God, the Son of God, the only begotten of the Father? Are the Father, Jesus His Son, and the Holy Spirit all God? Are they all equally God? Are they ALL GOD? So what did Jesus accomplish on the cross? What was His purpose for coming here?
dkarnish 5 months ago
@dkarnish Yahshua not Jesus ,Yes Yahshua is elohim,but not Yahweh! “Is it written , ‘I said, you are Elohim? If those to whom the word of Elohim called ‘Elohims’ —scripture cannot be annulled John 10.34-45,Ps 82 whoever does the will of my Father is my brother Matthew 12:50 But I know that you do not have the love of Elohim within you. John 5:42 Father sent me commanded me what to say and how to say it. John 12 49-50I love the Father I do exactly what my Father has commanded me. John 14:31
odephraimchai 5 months ago
@dkarnish "What was His purpose for coming here?"
His purpose here is to preach the Kingsdom of God within everyone of us (Luke 17:21-22) & we must seek it (Matt 6:33)
Luke 4:43 "I must preach the Kingdom of God to the other cities also, for I was sent for this purpose."
netelsg 5 months ago
@odephraimchai Obviously, since Peter wrote it, it would have had to have been written prior to his death, what does that have to do with your statement anyway. Why would the early council member Constantine put together to catalog the canon why did they put in a document that should have been obvious to them to be not authentic? Where is any historical documentation that shows the opposite point of view for the subject of this video. Next you will be telling me that Jesus never really existed
dkarnish 5 months ago
an Catholicism, IF IT ACTUALLY FOLLOWED the bible, woud be true Christianity. True christianity is faint now. before the bible as only in greek and latin, no one could read it but educated peoples, makin it easy for people to just lie about what it meant, or what it said. Satan cant destroy God's Word, so he makes it so no one actually can read it, and if so, lackin the capacty and knowledge to comprehend it
Goodtimes1333 5 months ago
actually, if acts 15 is read correctly, peter confirms that gentiles were distinguished no differently by the Holy Spirit than Jews. also, James stands up, agrees in teh apostle council, and resites Scripture.Acts 15:16-19, then acts 15:23-30 is a direct letter of the apostles to the believers in antioch, syria, cilicia...in reference to galatians...James did disagree at first until Paul confronted peter, and they held the council MENTIONED in acts to decide it out. Paul never lied once
Goodtimes1333 5 months ago
Lord,Please bless your messenger Paul, for onthe day of righteousness and judgement, all will bow there heads to you O Lord Christ Jesus, and even I, with paul, will all hold hands in prayer and worship to you! amen
Goodtimes1333 5 months ago
Catholic, which just means UNIVERSAL, and they are the biggest idol worshiping, legalistic, pagan cult. Why would the Vatican not be called The Church OF Jesus Christ and instead St.peters basilica? and also, according to old testament AND new testament, no one can even become a saint, not until the resurrection of the dead, and new kingdom coming
Goodtimes1333 5 months ago
@Goodtimes1333 since we Catholics are the TRUE church AND the reason that some of the christian sects exist i think that gives us the right to change whatever we see fit .... damn protestants always creating bullshit.
thegreenghost1000 5 months ago
peter himself says..Wherefore also it is contained in the Scripture, Behold, I lay in Sion a chief corner stone, elect, precious; and he that believeth on Him shall not be confounded. Unto you therefore which believe He is preciou: but unto them which be disobedient, the stone which the builders disallowed, the same is made the head of the corner, and, a stone of stumbling, and a ROCK of offence, even to them which stumble at the word, being disobedient: (I Peter 2:4. 6-8)
i was brought up
Goodtimes1333 5 months ago
clearly a highy mentioned character of the gospels, acts...but he is of no more signifiant importance than anyother. "And I say to thee. thou art Peter, and upon this rock I will build my Church, and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it." Matthew 16:18, people quote all the time but why would Jesus say, Ima establich my church based on peter? people forget his name was Simon son of Jonah, Cephas is greek for rock, and
Goodtimes1333 5 months ago
Brothers and sisters, Paul is not a liar. this video uses the books of Acts to accuse Paul or heresy by quoting passages about how "the real apostles" were still Jews, but the writer of Acts was Luke, who then later while traveling with PAUL even states he is with Paul. Luke traveled exclusively with Paul at a certain point and the gospel that Paul taught was Luke's. the first pope was in 400 something AD, and they say even said the pope iwas infallible. Peter was never the first pope, he is
Goodtimes1333 5 months ago
"...God, who knows the heart, testified to them giving them (the Gentiles) the Holy Spirit, just as He also did to us (the Jews); and He made no distinction between us and them, cleansing their hearts by faith. Now therefore why do you put God to the test by placing upon the neck of the disciples a yoke which neither our fathers nor we have been able to bear? But we believe that we are saved through the grace of the Lord Jesus, in the same way as they also are" - Peter (see Acts 15:7-11).
Keruaran 6 months ago
Another lying video :(
SoldierOfChrist110 7 months ago
Jesus may God's mercy and blessing be upon him says as recorded in Matthew 5:19:
"Anyone who breaks one of the least of these commandments and teaches others to do the same will be called least in the kingdom of heaven, but whoever practices and teaches these commands will be called great in the kingdom of heaven."
Thus Paul is a liar, what he has built is not what Jesus left behind, and he has always been in direct violation to Jesus' disciples. Bear in mind Disciples are students of Jesus!
MatrixOfDynamism 7 months ago
So, I get it now, you guys are saying that because Paul said we don't gave to do the Jewish law like Sat. Well you know that we are not Jewish and Peter was acting like a Jew when he was with the Jews?and like a Gentile when he was with the Gentiles? Why is that?
julieturcios41 7 months ago
The Apostles and Elders agreed with Paul.Read Acts 15! What did Peter say v6-12 The law was kept perfectly by Christ. And all its penalties against God’s sinful people were poured out on Christ. Therefore, the law is now manifestly not the path to righteousness, Christ is. The ultimate goal of the law is that we would look to Christ, not law-keeping, for our righteousness.
Rom 10:4: For Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to everyone who believes
Prophets4Christ 7 months ago
Too bad you forgot Acts10:9-23 It was PETER who received the revelation Acts 9:34-35 " I now realize how true it is that God does not show favioratism, but accepts men from every nation who fear him and do what is right. Paul was holding Peter to this revelation.
Jonathan2342 8 months ago
@exposingthemachine Interesting, so you know the birthrates of all these great beings. Could you show me their birth certificates? Not that I'm saying your full of crap or anything but I like to see proof of something before I accept it as fact.
PMnews1 9 months ago
Actually this what you have stated is a true version of the traditional Catholic view on Paul, and that of many evangelicals as well, however I would recommend Paul did not eat pork., a book by derek leeman. When read in context the Paul and james supposed contravery falls to pieces.In reformed theology the Good works of James had a place as well.It results from the in dwelling of the holys spririt.Thus that good works is a results of the Faith that justifies.Hipe that helps
1brandwag 9 months ago
The Jews will eventualy have their eyes open to the truth of who Jesus is, this will only happen after the time of the Gentiles is fulfilled.
dannyud 9 months ago
on a side note, i feel that there is indeed something fishy about Paul. it seems to me Jesus would have been more clear if he indeed was the end of the Law. it seems interesting too, that all the instances where these doctrinal changes occurred, i.e. the eating of unclean animals, allowing gentiles into the faith, circumcision not required... why didn't Jesus himself appear to the 12 apostles and tell them this stuff directly instead of choosing a man who had never met him to represent him?
thetruthrover 10 months ago
nice video, but in all fairness, acts 10:14 does show that Peter refused to eat things unclean, but if you read the preceeding verse, the voice, (presumably God) tells Peter "rise, slaughter and eat!". next in verse 15, God says, "you stop calling defiled the things God has cleansed.". And if you read on, in verse 28, Peter says, referring apparently to his dream, "God has shown me I should call no man defiled or unclean." Would it be safe to say that Peter changed his mind at this time?
thetruthrover 10 months ago
@0:48 - Paul said just the opposite, "Keeping God's commands is what counts" in 1 Corinthians 7:19b
@1:07 - when Paul says "we conclude", he's talking about he and the Twelve and the Holy Spirit! Proof: Acts 15:13-29 - see, it's James himself who delegated that! Romans 3:28? read on to verse 31 :|
The people that are spreading this ought to be ashamed of themselves for not only causing divisions among believers, but especially of Christ's emissaries - do they want them to judge them?
krononomikon 10 months ago
@krononomikon but Paul did not say Jews shouldn't observe the Law, but "let him who is circumcised(Jewish) not become uncircumcised(Gentile), and let him who is uncircumcised not become circumcised" as far as salvation goes. Why? Going back to Peter being kosher, that's good! But even since the order of the Law, in Leviticus it alludes to the unkosher animals being symbolic of Gentiles and their abominable practices (idols). Even though Israel HAD the Torah, they were not justified by it...
krononomikon 10 months ago
@krononomikon ...such as in places in Ezekiel 23, where they were rebuked for letting the unclean practices of the Gentiles (idols and sacrificing children) into them, as a whore lets a stranger into her husband's bed! THAT is why Paul is saying that faith matters, and not "keeping the works of the Law", because otherwise he'd be against himself saying keeping God's commands are what counts. No, but one can pretend to be lawful while doing it as a show, but being inwardly greedy and covetous
krononomikon 10 months ago
Paul never refers to himself as "Saul" and never mentions Gamaliel. Paul did not write the book of Acts.
KayBeeEee1983 10 months ago
So the billions upon billions of years the Word was with YHWH and thus becoming a trust and reliance was soon to be replaced by another called, faith....
So all those yrs the Word was made manifest into the form of Yahushua was incorrect you say? I say, NOT!!!
Yahushua lived Torah and that's howcome His path is narrow. Paul opened it up to anything goes mentality...grace of Paul the self appointed apostle.
materialclassified 11 months ago
i think you don,t understand, AT this point the Lord Jesus was not as he is now. Figure that one out if you are so smart.
buzzobug 11 months ago
Jesus was the Messiah and he did come to save the Jews but he also came for the gentiles which many Jews rejected.
Jesus did not say not to follow the Torah. Matthew 5:17
Peter was given the vision to break with some of the old testament doctrines but not all. Some of these things God didn't want the people to do anymore, like the barbaric practice of circumcision. The disciples themselves were confused about these things at first and there were arguments and divisions.
PMnews1 11 months ago
@PMnews1 Ending circumcision is Pauline doctrine in Galatians 5:2 instead of by Peter. Please read your Bible properly by citing its pertinent verse, dude!!!
saidinmas 11 months ago
@saidinmas Circumcision was a satanic blood ritual that comes from Egypt originally. Its kind of like branding your cattle. It can be used as an initiation rite to prove your loyalty to a cause but done to unwilling infants is barbaric. Many things were allowed in the old testament that were not necessarily the will of God.
(Mark 10 4:5)
On circumcision it was more than just Paul (Acts 15: 1-2, 7, 10) so did Peter.
PMnews1 11 months ago
@PMnews1 What's wrong with you, dude? Even Jesus himself was circumcised as an ethnic Jew who followed the Abrahamic tradition of circumcision. Paul compromised Jesus' teaching with the gentiles, coz Jesus was sent to the Jews only in See Matthew 15:24, Matthew 1:21, and Matthew 5:17-18.
saidinmas 10 months ago
@saidinmas I believe Jesus had to downplay things a bit because these Jews are so arrogant and supremacist in their beliefs. Like the woman at the well. His disciples were shocked he would talk to a "heathen" non-Jew. Later he told the story of the good Samaritan to try and mellow them out a bit. I believe it was always Jesus's plan to teach the non-Jews but had to start with the Jews has part of God's contract. Circumcision they picked up from Egypt, kind of like like branding your cattle.
PMnews1 10 months ago
@PMnews1 Why don't you read your Bible properly to discover that Abraham and Jesus were both circumcised, and that Jesus were sent to the Israelites only in Matthew 15:24 & 1:21, BUT Paul screwed up Jesus' teaching by preaching to the Gentiles and abolishing circumcision in Gal 5:2.
saidinmas 10 months ago
@saidinmas I have read the bible and know it better than most pastors and priests do. I know the bible says Jesus and Abraham were circumcised but that doesn't mean its right. I don't believe everything in the bible is necessarily right nor do I believe everything has been properly translated. The Jews got circumcision from the Egyptians and it was kind of like branding your cattle, they usually did it to slaves. As I understand but it was also a form of blood magic which is evil!
PMnews1 10 months ago
@PMnews1 Yes, circumcision is an Abrahamic tradition, and Abraham was never among the slaves who were circumcised in ancient Egypt as the correct and indisputable historical fact. The Egyptian slaves in referring to the Israelites under Moses were long time after Abraham. Moses was circumcised and was never a slave there, coz he was adopted and brought up in Pharoah's palace.
saidinmas 9 months ago
@PMnews1 God is ordering Circumcission since that is important for a person who is in the covenent.
MatrixOfDynamism 7 months ago
@MatrixOfDynamism Which god ordered circumcision? Is - Ra or El?
PMnews1 6 months ago
@PMnews1 Jesus his dady
donnomar 6 months ago
@MatrixOfDynamism Yes, any Gentile who accepts Yeshua as the Messiah must follow Torah. I'm one of them!
ChildofYeshua777 5 months ago
@ChildofYeshua777
GENTILES WHO FOLLOW THE TORAH-DO NOT NEED YESHUA. THEY RELY UPON THE LAW.
GENTILES WHO ACCEPTS YESHUAH AND PROFESS TO FOLLOW THE TORAH-ARE LIARS WHEN SAYING SO: BECAUSE THE WOULD BE OBLIGED TO KILL :
-THOSE WHO BREAK THE SABBATH(EXD 31,15 )
- TO KILL THEIR OWN CHILDREN WHEN THEY ARE UPRISING AGAINST THEIR PARENTs(DEUT 21:18-21) TO KILL THOSE WHO COMMIT ADULTURY(DEUT 22:24)
Ni1234ckA 5 months ago
@Ni1234ckA Pauline Christianity= Forget all the teachings of the Tanakh because you're saved by faith. Ok, I'm gonna do whatever I want. At least Muslims understand the Torah better than Christians.
ChildofYeshua777 5 months ago
@ChildofYeshua777 back that statement up by new testament scripture please. and would you please be so kind as to explain EXACTLY what you mean by TORAH? As a Christian saved by the loving, kind gift of God's grace through His Son Jesus (Yeshua) by His death on the cross and His resurrection three days later SCRIPTURE, the WORD who is JESUS, is my highest and final authority in these matters, so your gonna have to provide something to back your statements up. Otherwise your statement is hot air.
dkarnish 5 months ago
@dkarnish Mattiyahu 5:17 and Acts 15 introduced the Gentiles to the Noahide laws. Also the book of Ya'akov (James) says faith w/o works is dead. Saying all we have to do is believe in "Jesus" and all is cool in YHVH's eyes in a free license to sin.
ChildofYeshua777 5 months ago
@ChildofYeshua777 oh now we get to the truth, the noahide laws. And you seriously lack the understanding of what James was saying, which is in agreement with Jesus and with John who both said you will know a person by their fruit, which is what James was speaking about. If a person says they have faith and there is no fruit then they really don't have the faith they claim to. Paul covered the whole free to sin part in Romans very well, he explained that to live in Christ is to be dead to sin.
dkarnish 5 months ago
@ChildofYeshua777 oh and no, matthew 5:17 and Acts 15 did nothing of the sort, have you even read both of them? And like I told 'ODEPHRAIMCHAI' earlier, Luke, who wasn't an apostle, wrote both the Gospel of Luke AND THE BOOK OF ACTS. which tells all about Saul's conversion and ministry. If you believe Luke wrote correctly, and he is the author of both, then your denying scripture, because LUKE obviously saw no issue with any anything against Saul/Paul. Your only argument is to attack scripture.
dkarnish 5 months ago
@ChildofYeshua777 oh and no, matthew 5:17 and Acts 15 did nothing of the sort, have you even read both of them? And like I told 'ODEPHRAIMCHAI' earlier, Luke, who wasn't an apostle, wrote both the Gospel of Luke AND THE BOOK OF ACTS. which tells all about Saul's conversion and ministry. If you believe Luke wrote correctly, and he is the author of both, then your denying scripture, because LUKE obviously saw no issue with any anything against Saul/Paul. Your only argument is to attack scripture.
dkarnish 5 months ago
@dkarnish I think Mattiyahu is more accurate than Luke , anyway.
ChildofYeshua777 5 months ago
@PMnews1 Unlike Peter and others who saw Jesus, Paul who innovated differently from Jesus' teaching never saw Jesus' face at all as a matter of indisputable fact in Bible LOL!!!
saidinmas 11 months ago
@saidinmas So you can not be a Christian or a servant of Christ unless you meet Jesus face to face. OK, thanks for your words of wisdom.
PMnews1 11 months ago
Fail, Paul was referring to the sacrificial law in romans 3:28. Paul was a Torah observing Jew like the others, If you have read the whole bible then you would know that Moses was given two laws, commands and animal sacrificial law. The only law that became obsolete was the sacrificial law because Jesus was the sacrifice
Shaqpack609 11 months ago
0:24 Jesus as God? The verses in the book of Acts which tells this tale, says nothing about Jesus as God or Paul thinking such a thing. THAT little concept was a later invention and creation by Europeans. And it spread like wild fire. More like fungus or the borg in Star Trek.
SCORNDOGGMELACH 11 months ago
the Lord Jesus spoke and the world was created. did you not read in the book of Colossians where it says that "by Him ALL THINGS WERE CREATED", what do you think that means?
buzzobug 11 months ago
@buzzobug That means the Bible Lord ate Abraham's food in Genesis and used a toilet like you are created to do like that too LOL!!!.
saidinmas 11 months ago
If Paul relied on Jesus' disciples for info, then where is the chain of narrators tracing back to Jesus' disciples. Remember that Christian scholars on the history of Christianity do acknowledge that the 4 gospels were written by those whose surnames or last names were unknown or multiple anonymous authors, when in fact Jesus' disciples must have last names that those anonymous gospel writers did NOT know them as a matter of fact.
saidinmas 11 months ago
The Apostle Peter opposed the Judaizers by reporting on how God poured out His Holy Spirit on the gentiles: “So God, who knows the heart, acknowledged them by giving them the Holy Spirit, just as He did to us, and made no distinction between us and them, purifying their hearts by faith.
obamasucksdik 1 year ago
Paul is the Apostle to the gentiles!
obamasucksdik 1 year ago
2 PETER 3:1-17...2 TIMOTHY 3:1-17...
The3in1trinity 1 year ago
Paul the Tarsus is not the same in the eyes of Nazarene, which are Christians according to modern definition and non-Christians according to early church father's definition.
You are mentioning the majority view. According to us, your message is biased.
Yoshuayovel 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Christianity is a lie exposingchristianity. com
TheSatanwarrior 1 year ago
@TheSatanwarrior read your page, interesting, funny, historically inaccurate. The catholic church is not the root of Christianity, far from it in fact, but yes they are controlled very much by secret and not so secret societies these days. For someone who claims to have knowledge, shouldn't you be aware then that Judaism in it's modern form is really kabbalah? Islam was really a product of catholic invention and influence. Also, what proof do you offer that Jesus never really existed? Thanks.
dkarnish 5 months ago
Man c'mon please...you actually believe that! You know what, it is later in the day than I even realized! Lord We Need You To Come Soon! PV
VinDC1234 1 year ago
what did Peter do in 10 book of Acts and what did he do and say in 15chapter of Acts.
buzzobug 1 year ago
@buzzobug It's a Forgery of Paul's Mission and his breaking of the Law with God and 2nd Peter has been proven to be a forgery to most ALL Scholars!
MrsKevinsmith 1 year ago
@MrsKevinsmith , prove it.
buzzobug 1 year ago
sorry but you don,t know what you are talking about. and BTW, the Lord Jesus is God the Son and there is the Trinity of God.
buzzobug 1 year ago
@buzzobug There Is one separate God one Separate "messiah" Oh Lord Israel out lord is one. He never claimed to be god and admitted he was lesser than god so therefore NOT EGUAL! Paul Brought Paganism to the area and the Trinity is pure Pagan Godheads! You need to read all the missing texts and the Original King James has 60,000 KNOWN mistakes it's a Unholy Document! Paul was the Antichrist and the scriptures say he was present at the time of the New Testament writings already!
MrsKevinsmith 1 year ago
@MrsKevinsmith , sorry but if you read in the NT. Jesus claims to be God. like in the book of John where He claims to be "I AM" a Jew would never claim that. as they would know what they were saying , What did God say to Moses? Jesus is God just as he claimed and you can not believe just as so many of the Jews it says refused to believe. But there was some who did, and it is said the first 100,000 of the New Christians where Jews converts. They did believe in the Jewish Messiah
buzzobug 1 year ago
@buzzobug God never said to Moses that he's Jesus in OT, coz the name Jesus is in NT after instead of before his birth. Did God wear diapers and change diapers with his miraculous power? Absolutely never unless you beg to differ and deny the fact of life.
saidinmas 11 months ago
@saidinmas , hmmm have you read the OT or Nt? Because if you read in book of John , what does it say in 1st chapter? go read , Jesus Is LORD. , the facts remain that Jesus is God , and that one day He is going to return just as He said. and that is at the last day , just as he says., book of John. And all will rise then . The redeemed to eternal life with Him forever and those who have rejected Him to eternal damnation. I am one of the redeemed.
buzzobug 11 months ago
@buzzobug reads in a book of John that Jesus is God "his only begotten son" in John 3:16, then - What is the name of God whose begotten son is Jesus???
saidinmas 11 months ago
@saidinmas , John - Chapter one "in the beginning was the Word and the Word was with God and the Word was God. He was in the beginning with God, now to Verse 14, And the Word became flesh and dwelt amont us and we beheld His glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father, full of grace and truth.
book of Colossians. chapter 1, verse 15, He is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation. , 16, for by Him all things were created that are in heaven and.......
buzzobug 11 months ago
@buzzobug needs to compare with Matthew1:18 that Jesus is child of the Holy Spirit who did "come upon" Mary like a male animal does "come upon" a female animal to beget instead of the only begotten of the Father.
Christian scholars acknowledge of NOT knowing the surnames or last names for Mark, Matthew, Luke, and John to establish a chain of narration tracing back to the original disciples who saw and heard from Jesus; they also acknowledge that Paul never saw Jesus' face at all.
saidinmas 11 months ago
@buzzobug By the way, the term "come upon" is from Luke 1:35 instead of from me.
Moreover, John 1:14 about the "Word" is its personal pronoun is "It" instead of "He". Therefore, the "Word" cannot refer to a person or man according to the rules of the English grammar.
saidinmas 11 months ago
@saidinmas , do you not read and see that the 1st chapter of the book of John is about the Word and that means the Lord Jesus is the Word. He spoke and the universe was created. He is the Creator. God the Son. , as i wrote, book of Colossians. C-1 verse 16a, For by Him ALL THINGS WERE CREATED...... in the book of Titus, C-2 verse 13, "lookijg for th eblessed hope and glorious appearing of our great God and Saviour Jesus Christ"....
buzzobug 11 months ago
@buzzobug What is John's last name if he was a disciple of Jesus who wrote the gospel of John?
coz Christian scholars do NOT know John's last name in order to establish a chain of narration from him who saw and heard from Jesus.
The term "logo" is a later addition in the last Greek gospel. Besides, the personal pronoun of "Word" is "It" instead of "He" in the English grammar.
God the Son Jesus begets Jesus the Son of God. Come on.
saidinmas 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@saidinmas , book of John , C-1, verse 14, "and the Wordbecame flesh and welt among us, and we beheld His glory as of the only begotten of the Father, full of grace and truth. tell me do you see were it says that the Word became "FLESH", show me were a "IT" BECOMES FLESH" the Bible is quite clear and that the Lord Jesus came in the flesh and He is God and the only REDEEMER of mankind. and i one day am going to see Him face to face and there serve my God forever.
buzzobug 11 months ago
@saidinmas His name was John bar Zebedee because he was the son of Zebedee. Most Jews did not have surnames at the time. The fact that you don't know that makes my head spin...HONESTLY...
Rogueoftroy 11 months ago
@Rogueoftroy Where does the Bible say "John bar Zebedee"?
Would you deny Jesus' surname i.e Jesus son of Mary?
coz Christian scholars claim that child Jesus is 'conceived' by the Holy Spirit instead of by the Father.
See Matt 1:18 where child Jesus is of the Holy Spirit instead of the Father. So, -Why would Jesus invoke the Father instead of the Holy Spirit in Bible?
saidinmas 11 months ago
@saidinmas It doesn't say John bar Zebedee. But it does say that Zebedee is John's father. There is no real point in you arguing the point. It's not debate. It's just a fact of history that that is how names were rendered in Israel at that point in history. And no, Jesus would have been Jesus bar Joseph, as Joseph was His legal father (of course all these names would be in their Hebraic forms). And your point about the Holy Spirit is moot. It does not change the relationship btw Son and Father.
Rogueoftroy 11 months ago
@Rogueoftroy is unfortunately unable to prove any reference or verse stating "John bar Zebedee" in Bible.
It's NOT my point, but it's the Bible's point in Luke 1:35 proving Jesus' begotten son relationship with the Holy Spirit instead of with the Father.
saidinmas 11 months ago
@saidinmas The Bible said John's father was Zebedee. So his name was John bar Zebedee. That's how names worked. If you are actually arguing with that point, you are straight-up retarded. And no, your point about Luke is wrong. The Holy Spirit is named as the mechanism by which Mary conceived. But the father/son relationship is still with the Father and the Son. Arguing with that also indicates retardation. And reading so much into that text that is contrary to other texts is just ridiculous.
Rogueoftroy 11 months ago
@Rogueoftroy stated "The Holy Spirit (any male animal) is named as the mechanism by which Mary (a female animal) conceived." To be specific in Luke 1:35 where the Holy Spirt did "come upon" Mary like a male animal does "come upon" a female animal in the begetting.
Why were the gospels in Greek instead of in Aramaic, the mother-tongue language of Jesus and disciples?
coz Christian scholars admit the Bible was written by anonymous authors in Greek.
saidinmas 11 months ago
@saidinmas Your "point" about Mary is so stupid I can't even believe you are serious. And as for Greek...it was the universal language. DUH. And the fact that you found a few Christian scholars who say that authorship was added later does not mean that the vast majority do no disagree. You are the stupidest person I've talked to on here in a long time (and that's saying something). Talking to you is pointless.
Rogueoftroy 11 months ago
@Rogueoftroy makes Your "point" about Mary is so stupid I can't even believe you. And as for Greek...it was FALSELY the universal language COZ JESUS AND DISCIPLES USED ARAMAIC . DUH. And the fact that you found a few Christian scholars who say that authorship was added later does not mean that the vast majority do no disagree WITH THE CHANGES IN BIBLE VERSIONS. You are the stupidest person I've talked to on here in a long time (and that's saying something). Talking to you is pointless.
saidinmas 11 months ago