This is why poker is so profitable at the lower levels. U donks don't realize it was a bluff. Heinz check raised all in to get statsko to fold a straight/sets and higher two pairs. Obviously he's never getting called by worse
@ftotheelix123 Buy-in into tournament was $10,000 for which player received 30k chips. Technically, since there are 205,9M chips in play and 1st+2nd prize combined is circa $14,3M, we could say that one dollar is represtented by about 14 chips.
man how can he has the best hand? he only beat a bluff and if he knew that he would call. he get only called by better hands! straight or even a flush...so i think he put staszko on two pair also and tried to lay him two pair down. Maybe even a straight but it dont think so
@deadmonable Okay maybe I should just make it loud and clear for all this idiots who know nothing about poker. When Heinz shoved all-in at the river, he was representing a flush to make Staszko fold any J-x hand he could have. Heinz obviously only had 2 pair which on a board like that, doesn't really beat much thus he bluff shoved to make Staszko fold.
@doomwolf240 dude sorry but that isnt right its only a bluff when you dont have the best hand. because if staszko called heinz still would of won so therefore not a bluff but a great play by heinz.
ok he won the hand, but in his head he was bluffing because he thought his hand was beat. As it turns out, he did actually have the best hand. It's only when you watch these hands without knowing the pocket cards that you appreciate how hard it is to work out what your opponent has!
Not sure about this play IMO :S Exactly like Esfandiari said, why not just call if you think youre good? Hes never being called by worse, so whats the point in reshoving. Possibly folding out a J is his only hope right? If im stazsko, im never value betting worse than a J (Unless of course, he goes for very thin value with a set/higher 2p - but thats ridiculous?) And he shows it as if its some kind of achievement? 90% of the time he has the best hand here with stazsko folding? IMO anyway :)
@Rodario10 I would agree, had there not been a 1 card straight with something Stazsko could easy of had and bet with on the river(jack)... no one will know if heinz truly believed he was ahead or not.... all im sayying... WHO THE FUCK CARES
@TomMolivan there's actually no bluff. heinz bets the river to get value for his twopair hand which he correctly thinks is the best hand.
no way he put staszko on a jack and thinks he can get him of a straight pretending he checked a flush on the river. you maybe could call it a 'bluff with the best hand'...but calling it a 'SICK BLUFF'...seen sick bluffs a lot but that's just a really good play by heinz based on the read he had. maybe you specify 'your' uploads better next time..
@ridc189ee the number of hands Heinz has beat AND will get called with is uncomparably smaller than the number of hands that have him beat but will fold
Very stupid move indeed. He would only be called losing, then he should just call oO so obvious... lol, or he was expecting to make Stazsko fold his possible straight ? Sick and bad move indeed.
There is no bluff !! Stasko limped in and just called putting a Jack out of his range he didnt raise when the turn brought the flush in, he floated two streets and value bet the river putting Hienz on a busted str8. Heinz on the other hand knew his two pair was good and checked the river so Stasko would value bet which he did and went all in to MAKE it looke like was bluffing . Its an online play lol people do it a lot pretty crazy tho your read has to be right on.
Like Heinz would ever c/shove a flush on this board, I would have called with Jx here everytime.
Heinz is very unlikely to play a flush this way because Staszko's Range mostly consists of medium made hands that will always Check Back the river .
Staszko somehow happened to have A8 no diamond this time (which he played terribly btw, he should have either folded the turn or raised the turn , which would have gotten Heinz to fold ,since this turn is absolutely the worst card in the deck for Heinz)
Isn't this a stupid play? Isn't Staszko pretty much gonna call with everything that has Heinz beat with how bluffy he is and how often Stas had been calling his river raises? He was basically bluff catching but just putting more money in the pot.
@JeeRaph like 90% of hands with some value would check that river for pot control like heinz did.
i would bet for value against almost every opponent here with Q/10, if they reraise me i fold
in this scenario looks to me that from 10 times if i bet here im going to get value 4 or 5 times, they going to checkraise me like 1 time, and they are going to fold the rest
and ofc im folding if they reraise me on river.
Someone with or without a jack would bet that river anyway
@superdave...well clearly your wrong, as he won and was a worthy winner, had another final table earlier, and you probably couldnt even post the buy in,in this hand he's repping a monster, or just know that stazko has been calling him light throught heads up so knew he didnt have much
@Raappisk....yes?he read that he had a better hand and needed to bluff, do you not understand that??he didnt think he had just a pair, he thought that an all in would make him fold whatever he had, maybe he thought he had a jack, set or better two pair, or maybe he just didnt want to show his hand by calling and winning so went all in
@dellcamwall You obviously dont understand the con if Heinz's play. I'm not saying i was any better than Heinz, but this wasn't his best play. Call would have been the best play as his shove was completely unnecessary. Get it, stazsko would have called with straight or better.
@Cheshario Actually he is since decent amount of time he is not going to have the best hand. At that point there are quite a few better two pair hands in Staszko's range as well as straights that he wants to fold out.
@TomMolivan what a dumb lol- you think Heinz is bluffing cause he could make Stazsko fold better two pair or a completed straight, heads up??? you are the biggest fish on earth, period.
tbh everyone raves about this heinz. from what ive seen hes an idiot - and is more suited to $1 sit n gos. Yes, despite the fact he won. I mean on a board of king, ten x , hes re re raising all in with ace high. Shit play in myopinion and he got lucky it held up. In this hand - whats he representing? nothing. If stasgo has a Jack or better hes getting called
@superdave31 "If stasgo has a Jack or better hes getting called" - well that's kinda whole point of Heinz's river shove + I would not be 100% confident he would called with a jack either
@TomMolivan well if i hold a jack thre im calling. If he has the flush, im out or whatever. sometimes in poker you gotta call even tho you could be losing, sometimes those situations just occur and this would be one of them
@TomMolivan if i hold a jack there, im 100 percent caalling. Sometimes in poker you gotta call even tho you feel your probably losing. for this exact reason. if hes got it, hes got it but i aint folding a jack there
@superdave31 Sure, but you would at least think about him having a flush, as most of his aggressive plays aren't bluffs, and if I were heinz I'd think it's kind of hard of staszko to have a jack
That's not a bluff! Stazsko made a mistake by betting in the river! He believed Heinz was bluffing all the way and he thought his 8 was good but it was not. Heinz, by being an agressive player, risked everything because he believed Stazko was thinking that he was bluffing.
@Raappisk how did heinz read his hand wrong, he's not trying to get him to call worse, he;s trying to make him fold better (better 2 pair,set, straight)
@dellcamwall So he read stazsko has better hand so he needs to bluff, and it turns out he had a worse hand! Two pair beats pair as far as I remember. So yes, he read stazskos hand wrong and risked all his chips by raising while he would have simply won by calling. I really would have liked to see stazsko calling him with flush or straight, which both were very well possible for him to have. Heinz really dodged the bullet here so to say.
@Raappisk i agreel. dumb play by heinz. People rave about him but all ive seen are dumb plays where he got lucky. his hand here - hes getting snap called by an y flush of jack.
It's not all that of a bluff, as he actually had the best hand... But it's beautiful to see his check at the river, he knew that Staszko would bet high and really fudged staszko with his all-in.
Thanks for watching my video guys, I appreciate it! Do not forget to rate, comment and subscribe as well as check the description to easily get free (yes, FREE) $50 to a pokersite of your choice!
It really was a bluff! I'm not saying Heinz isn't capable of valueshoving that river in certain situations, but I'm pretty sure Heinz thinks Staszko isn't valuebetting the river with worse hands than his except maybe a worse 2 pair but he's never shoving to get paid by a worse 2 pair lol. Also if he had Staszko on a bluff he never raises
What a risky play... He obviously would have gotten called if Staszko had the J which was more likely than a set or higher two pair. Staszko could even have had a flush... So Heinz read Stazskos hand wrong, also he would have gotten called if he read it right. Also, he could never get called by worse hand. Never.
What a risky play... He obviously would have gotten called if Staszko had the J which was more likely than a set or higher two pair. Staszko could even have had a flush... So Heinz read Stazskos hand wrong, also he would have gotten called if he read it right. Also, he could never get called by worse hand. Never.
The clicking of HeinZ's chips would drive me crazy and i would probably kill him.What are the rules?Isn't such noise forbidden on the table? He deliberately spoils Staszkos attempts to concentrate!
How can u say that wasn't a bluff? That play was so advanced that some of u railbird micro stake donks can't comprehend. BRAVO to u Heinz u have a bright future.
Wow u guys know nothing. Take it from this pro, Heinz was bluffing. He expects statsko to check all one pair hands. Stats is betting river with straight, flush,two pairs, unlikely sets, and rarely a bluff. Knowing this Heinz checks and when stats decides to bet instead of check Heinz decides to turn his hand into a bluff. Heinz knows that stats will often only call with a flush
Heinz had a read on Staszko there. He knew he had the best hand and could call. But he shoved... he hoped Staszko thought he had complete air... so Staszko might call with any pair... It's a great play not even some pro's might understand and no one ever tries... It's deep thinking here... Well done Pius Heinz.
@Odessa1983 Neben seinem Namen ist die deutsche Flagge abgezeichnet? Ist es das was du meinst?? Ich hab ähnliche Kommentare jetzt schon mehrfach gelesen hier, und ich schnallts wirklich nicht? Was meinst du/ihr? Klär mich diesbezüglich doch bitte mal auf!
@daveyb420 A bluff is when you know your hand is beat, but you think your opponent would fold to one last big bet. With a four-card straight on the board, this was definitely a bluff.
This is a bluff. The guys at the beginning stating it isn't because he has the best hand are idiots... You can be bluffing with the best hand. It's a clear bluff... if it isn't then are you guys claiming it's a value bet? Which worse hand do you think pays off 89 there to gain value? Answer: None. Heinz thought he needed to bluff to win (as watergun put it to maybe fold out better two pairs or even sets). Don't like the play myself - if Staszko had the J its an easy (enough) call.
@seabazzz You can never say its proven wrong based on the outcome of one hand. That would be results orientated which is never a wise course to take in poker. You could say its a great read/play by Heinz but I would dispute this. He clearly THOUGHT he was beat as he could've just called and showed the winner without having to risk his entire stack. On this occasion Staszko didn't have the J but I don't think he folds that and that's why I don't like the play.
@ricardo3326 I'm not so sure if it is a bad play... If Staszko's range is super wide on the river (which is vindicated by seeing that he called twice with A8 no draw), and he bets out a majority of his range when checked to, the checkraise shove may also fold out hands like Q10, 109, Q9 and even maybe a slowplayed set that has played this way. I also agree that given the dynamic there is no way Staszko folds a J there however...
Also it's a bluff is when you TRY to get a better hand to fold.
@ricardo3326 That's the bad and risky play that made him the chip leader again.
Poker is made of risks, the best player is the one who is not afraid to take risks and do whatever it's needed to win. That's why I think makievskyi and heinz are the best players of this november nine. Ben Lamb, as I thought, turned out to be a total disappointment.
@Gabrielnfs the best player is the one, who's able to do maximum +EV moves in every single situation, no matter what it is or what his state of mind is... it has nothing to do with risk, if you want to take a risk, go play a game of roulette...
pius wins if he just calls so the only reason to make this play is to make staszko lay down the straight which who knows if he would beleive pius and also its possible staszko has the flush. weird play.
This is why poker is so profitable at the lower levels. U donks don't realize it was a bluff. Heinz check raised all in to get statsko to fold a straight/sets and higher two pairs. Obviously he's never getting called by worse
ucla198 3 hours ago
Funny if stazsko had J and called. The line between donk and champ is damn thin..
Raappisk 1 week ago
Wow Heinz with an awesome call. Wow
therightstuff90731 1 month ago
Comment removed
code13cz 1 month ago
Pls don`t flame for this question, but how many chips are one dollar? Thx.
ftotheelix123 1 month ago
@ftotheelix123 Buy-in into tournament was $10,000 for which player received 30k chips. Technically, since there are 205,9M chips in play and 1st+2nd prize combined is circa $14,3M, we could say that one dollar is represtented by about 14 chips.
TomMolivan 1 month ago
Staszko is such a stupid player,and so easy to read....
raduquuu 2 months ago
@raduquuu you are an ugly person beyond repair and you will never have sex with anyone unless you commit animal rape.
ocm4r 2 months ago
@ocm4r Wtf is wrong with you?Are you martin Staszko or what's your problem dude?I just said my opinion
raduquuu 2 months ago
@raduquuu no, you just trolling.
Zehllicka 1 month ago
@raduquuu Stupid player wouldn't win 90 million dollars, you dumb fuckhead.
ondra159 1 month ago
@ondra159 it's chips, not dollars... i think he won about 6 million dollars
eydawn 1 month ago
@ondra159 and you have nothing...envy
grastmast 2 days ago
@raduquuu Stupid player Martin Staszko defeated almost 7000 players, you envious fucker.
Rhed009 1 month ago 2
@raduquuu envy
grastmast 2 days ago
PEOPLE!!!.Stop watching poker,if u can't recognize a bluff:(
bildrwic3 2 months ago
@bildrwic3 Stop playing poker would be more profitable advice I think.
TomMolivan 2 months ago 6
it was a bluff, he wasn't shove there for value, RETARDS
RoyMunsoned 2 months ago 2
11 diselikes nice try stazsko
dhMarcel97 2 months ago
man how can he has the best hand? he only beat a bluff and if he knew that he would call. he get only called by better hands! straight or even a flush...so i think he put staszko on two pair also and tried to lay him two pair down. Maybe even a straight but it dont think so
Naranja41 2 months ago
Stazsko made somewhat of a Bluff, But Heinz actually had him with the best hand with 2 pair, Stazsko DID NOT HAVE the best hand you dumb announcer.
DancingBear1991 2 months ago
it was like a bluff because he did thinks stazko has a 'j ' ok other way if he knew he was good just call...ok
senorH2012 2 months ago
its not a bluff if u have the best hand
TITAN503 2 months ago
Heinz looks like Edward from Twilight.
spyu 2 months ago
how would 8 A beat the 9 8 wtf??
doughnutman777 2 months ago
how is that a bluff fuk wits?
deadmonable 2 months ago
@deadmonable are u stupid?
RoyMunsoned 2 months ago
@deadmonable Okay maybe I should just make it loud and clear for all this idiots who know nothing about poker. When Heinz shoved all-in at the river, he was representing a flush to make Staszko fold any J-x hand he could have. Heinz obviously only had 2 pair which on a board like that, doesn't really beat much thus he bluff shoved to make Staszko fold.
doomwolf240 1 month ago
@doomwolf240 dude sorry but that isnt right its only a bluff when you dont have the best hand. because if staszko called heinz still would of won so therefore not a bluff but a great play by heinz.
juicetitans13 4 days ago
"Ace-8 from Statzko would have won it" ...Incorrect, Lon!!
JDLupus 2 months ago
ok he won the hand, but in his head he was bluffing because he thought his hand was beat. As it turns out, he did actually have the best hand. It's only when you watch these hands without knowing the pocket cards that you appreciate how hard it is to work out what your opponent has!
GregSoIs 2 months ago
was stasko trying to feign a fold before he actually did.
ElSpewtardo 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
FREEROLLS EVERY 15 MINUTES 24 HOURS A DAY
50% RAKE BACK BY USING CODE POKERCHIPS
PAID STRAIGHT INTO YOUR ACCOUNT WEEKLY
JOIN THE LOOSE ACTION
AT HIGH PULSE POKER
NO DEPOSIT REQUIRED !!!
***QUALIFY FOR 10,000 EURO XMAS TOURNEY***
champions20000009 3 months ago
Comment removed
champions20000009 3 months ago
oh..i see..in poker one pair is better than 2 pairs....UNBELIEVABLE!!!!!!!!!!!
lovedemmon80 3 months ago
where is the fucking bluff ..retard?!?!!?!?
lovedemmon80 3 months ago
@lovedemmon80 its clearly a bluff
jackbauer27Psn 2 months ago
@lovedemmon80
if someone is seeing a bluff in here, go back and play nl25 :D
Jenz8 1 month ago
Not sure about this play IMO :S Exactly like Esfandiari said, why not just call if you think youre good? Hes never being called by worse, so whats the point in reshoving. Possibly folding out a J is his only hope right? If im stazsko, im never value betting worse than a J (Unless of course, he goes for very thin value with a set/higher 2p - but thats ridiculous?) And he shows it as if its some kind of achievement? 90% of the time he has the best hand here with stazsko folding? IMO anyway :)
Foxyyy13 3 months ago
Sign up to the fishiest site high pulse poker. Use referal code VHATK for 50% rakeback. Best offer out there!!
Kajjeh 3 months ago
esfandiari: we're never going to see a raise from heinz
undef1 3 months ago
NO BLUFF ))
SativaHouse 3 months ago in playlist Liked videos
Bad play from Heinz, imo..
xFerris 3 months ago 3
bluffing with the best hand. I think he should of just called
pogoman555 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
FREEROLLS 24 HOURS A DAY
50% RAKE BY USING CODE POKERCHIPS
JOIN THE LOOSE ACTION
AT HIGH PULSE POKER
NO DEPOSIT REQUIRED !!!
***QUALIFY FOR 10,000 EURO XMAS TOURNEY***
champions20000009 3 months ago
the Japanese people are calling Heinz the guy from assassin's creed
bukkakeswag 3 months ago
bluff???
heinz had the best hand!
Tennisandy22 3 months ago
@Tennisandy22
Out of position, would you go all in on two middle pairs with a flush and a straight draw? Not to mention trips or a higher two pair...
Bluffing has nothing to do with the results after the hand, bluffing depends on the strength of a hand during betting...
Better question, would you have guess that he had two middle pairs with his way of betting?
UtotheJ 3 months ago
lol at these comments, heinz clearly did this with the intention of a bluff.
mattdh12 3 months ago
Heinz did a good read he had 2 pair that is not a bluff because he hold a winning hand and he knew that, thats is my opinion.
Rodario10 3 months ago
@Rodario10 I would agree, had there not been a 1 card straight with something Stazsko could easy of had and bet with on the river(jack)... no one will know if heinz truly believed he was ahead or not.... all im sayying... WHO THE FUCK CARES
jwalk5763 3 months ago
Wheres is the bluff?
Rodario10 3 months ago 2
@Rodario10 on the river
TomMolivan 3 months ago 7
Comment removed
jwalk5763 3 months ago
@TomMolivan Semi bluff buddy, he had a pretty strong hand.
soccer1s8 3 months ago
@TomMolivan Technically you're right because he was trying to turn his hand into a bluff, but it was not a bluff because he had the best hand.
cloudstrife1288 2 months ago
@cloudstrife1288 But in his head he was bluffing. Therefore it's a bluff
jackbauer27Psn 2 months ago
@TomMolivan there's actually no bluff. heinz bets the river to get value for his twopair hand which he correctly thinks is the best hand.
no way he put staszko on a jack and thinks he can get him of a straight pretending he checked a flush on the river. you maybe could call it a 'bluff with the best hand'...but calling it a 'SICK BLUFF'...seen sick bluffs a lot but that's just a really good play by heinz based on the read he had. maybe you specify 'your' uploads better next time..
ridc189ee 1 month ago
@ridc189ee the number of hands Heinz has beat AND will get called with is uncomparably smaller than the number of hands that have him beat but will fold
TomMolivan 1 month ago
@Rodario10 better ask why Staszko was calling the way down to the river so stubbornly.
bigtasty780915 3 months ago
@Rodario10 its clearly a bluff
jackbauer27Psn 2 months ago
Very stupid move indeed. He would only be called losing, then he should just call oO so obvious... lol, or he was expecting to make Stazsko fold his possible straight ? Sick and bad move indeed.
geniosombrio 3 months ago
good commentary from Esfandiari!
bierbuik 3 months ago
8:50 a8 from staszko would have won it? what the fuck Lon
RoyMunsoned 3 months ago
There is no bluff !! Stasko limped in and just called putting a Jack out of his range he didnt raise when the turn brought the flush in, he floated two streets and value bet the river putting Hienz on a busted str8. Heinz on the other hand knew his two pair was good and checked the river so Stasko would value bet which he did and went all in to MAKE it looke like was bluffing . Its an online play lol people do it a lot pretty crazy tho your read has to be right on.
guanaco103 3 months ago
Comment removed
guanaco103 3 months ago
Hey Buddy...U have to watch some more Poker Vid´s before U post this called a Bluff...It isnt one ^^
bellyfive 3 months ago
Like Heinz would ever c/shove a flush on this board, I would have called with Jx here everytime.
Heinz is very unlikely to play a flush this way because Staszko's Range mostly consists of medium made hands that will always Check Back the river .
Staszko somehow happened to have A8 no diamond this time (which he played terribly btw, he should have either folded the turn or raised the turn , which would have gotten Heinz to fold ,since this turn is absolutely the worst card in the deck for Heinz)
STMotorsportTube 3 months ago
Isn't this a stupid play? Isn't Staszko pretty much gonna call with everything that has Heinz beat with how bluffy he is and how often Stas had been calling his river raises? He was basically bluff catching but just putting more money in the pot.
JeeRaph 3 months ago
@JeeRaph It looks like Staszko is trying to represent two pairs or a jack here, and heinz actually believes hem
he is not going to value bet a 4th pair here, it doesnt make sense, only better hands are going to call hem.
Heinz is very aggressive we all know that, but you cant compare others bluffs with this 3million bluff
Husapi 3 months ago
@Husapi Not sure I fully understood your comment but no one is value betting 2 pair here. 2 pair is only checking to showdown here.
JeeRaph 3 months ago
@JeeRaph Value betting here with two pairs like Q/10 has EV+ actually.
mostly amateurs are unable to make value bets here
Husapi 3 months ago
@Husapi They won't make value bets here because it's too thin and will make people fold worse hands.
JeeRaph 3 months ago
@JeeRaph You should ask about that in 2+2 forums, it will take long time to me to explain why is EV+ in a language thats not mine
Husapi 3 months ago
@Husapi Dude. I know what it means. You are wrong is what I am saying.
JeeRaph 3 months ago
@JeeRaph like 90% of hands with some value would check that river for pot control like heinz did.
i would bet for value against almost every opponent here with Q/10, if they reraise me i fold
in this scenario looks to me that from 10 times if i bet here im going to get value 4 or 5 times, they going to checkraise me like 1 time, and they are going to fold the rest
and ofc im folding if they reraise me on river.
Someone with or without a jack would bet that river anyway
Husapi 3 months ago
Real poker fans watch poker on جريدة نورت
Whimzy74 3 months ago
@superdave...well clearly your wrong, as he won and was a worthy winner, had another final table earlier, and you probably couldnt even post the buy in,in this hand he's repping a monster, or just know that stazko has been calling him light throught heads up so knew he didnt have much
dellcamwall 3 months ago
@Raappisk....yes?he read that he had a better hand and needed to bluff, do you not understand that??he didnt think he had just a pair, he thought that an all in would make him fold whatever he had, maybe he thought he had a jack, set or better two pair, or maybe he just didnt want to show his hand by calling and winning so went all in
dellcamwall 3 months ago
@dellcamwall You obviously dont understand the con if Heinz's play. I'm not saying i was any better than Heinz, but this wasn't his best play. Call would have been the best play as his shove was completely unnecessary. Get it, stazsko would have called with straight or better.
Raappisk 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Listen to new Poker Song "Ten Twenty Lenny"
ginalyn281 3 months ago
where is bluff??
Shurimanable 3 months ago
@Shurimanable on the river
TomMolivan 3 months ago
@TomMolivan he is not bluffin, he has the best hand idiot
Cheshario 3 months ago
@Cheshario Actually he is since decent amount of time he is not going to have the best hand. At that point there are quite a few better two pair hands in Staszko's range as well as straights that he wants to fold out.
TomMolivan 3 months ago
@TomMolivan what a dumb lol- you think Heinz is bluffing cause he could make Stazsko fold better two pair or a completed straight, heads up??? you are the biggest fish on earth, period.
b1nside 3 months ago
@b1nside well, it certainly is not a value raise
TomMolivan 3 months ago 2
@b1nside looser
viertro 3 months ago
@Cheshario are you a fucking moron? do u think hes shoving river there for value? idiot
RoyMunsoned 3 months ago
@Cheshario Idiot is you!!!
tiristor88 3 months ago
@tiristor88 idiot is you??? lol
Cheshario 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Cheshario IDIOT IS YOU
tiristor88 3 months ago
HEINZ look jonathan duhamel they wears jacket
PvZMichaels 3 months ago
Where is the last hand? You have also a video of "Anna Kurnkova" Hand?
IckeCNX 3 months ago
@IckeCNX just check my channel, it is there
TomMolivan 3 months ago
did you see how stas takes his cards to evoke a reaction of heinz haha nice xD
daoSabertricking 3 months ago
@daoSabertricking from
daoSabertricking 3 months ago
What would have happened, if Staszko had gone all in before Heinz?
afaik1Ben 3 months ago
tbh everyone raves about this heinz. from what ive seen hes an idiot - and is more suited to $1 sit n gos. Yes, despite the fact he won. I mean on a board of king, ten x , hes re re raising all in with ace high. Shit play in myopinion and he got lucky it held up. In this hand - whats he representing? nothing. If stasgo has a Jack or better hes getting called
superdave31 3 months ago
@superdave31 "If stasgo has a Jack or better hes getting called" - well that's kinda whole point of Heinz's river shove + I would not be 100% confident he would called with a jack either
TomMolivan 3 months ago
@TomMolivan well if i hold a jack thre im calling. If he has the flush, im out or whatever. sometimes in poker you gotta call even tho you could be losing, sometimes those situations just occur and this would be one of them
superdave31 3 months ago
@TomMolivan if i hold a jack there, im 100 percent caalling. Sometimes in poker you gotta call even tho you feel your probably losing. for this exact reason. if hes got it, hes got it but i aint folding a jack there
superdave31 3 months ago
@superdave31 Sure, but you would at least think about him having a flush, as most of his aggressive plays aren't bluffs, and if I were heinz I'd think it's kind of hard of staszko to have a jack
Gabrielnfs 3 months ago
@superdave31 you are only winning against a bluff if you had a jack here.
"sometimes in poker you gotta..." no, sometimes doesnt count when you are playing for 3 million of dollars more
Husapi 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
That's not a bluff! Stazsko made a mistake by betting in the river! He believed Heinz was bluffing all the way and he thought his 8 was good but it was not. Heinz, by being an agressive player, risked everything because he believed Stazko was thinking that he was bluffing.
vinigaropaba 3 months ago
Comment removed
vinigaropaba 3 months ago
Stazsko really made a push and looked as though he had it. He had quite a melt down.
dumprun01 3 months ago
I realize Antonio Esfandiari is quite an accomplished poker player, but his analysis was at times completely wrong.
dumprun01 3 months ago
phil ivey suppose to be d best in the world never one the wsop
MrWhosurdaddy09 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
FREEROLLS EVERY 15 MINUTES
ON HIGHPULSE POKER
BUILD YOUR BANK BALANCE
USING CODE POKERCHIPS
NO DEPOSIT REQUIRED
YES NO DEPOSIT !!!
champions20000009 3 months ago
@Raappisk how did heinz read his hand wrong, he's not trying to get him to call worse, he;s trying to make him fold better (better 2 pair,set, straight)
dellcamwall 3 months ago
@dellcamwall this
TomMolivan 3 months ago
@dellcamwall So he read stazsko has better hand so he needs to bluff, and it turns out he had a worse hand! Two pair beats pair as far as I remember. So yes, he read stazskos hand wrong and risked all his chips by raising while he would have simply won by calling. I really would have liked to see stazsko calling him with flush or straight, which both were very well possible for him to have. Heinz really dodged the bullet here so to say.
Raappisk 3 months ago
@Raappisk i agreel. dumb play by heinz. People rave about him but all ive seen are dumb plays where he got lucky. his hand here - hes getting snap called by an y flush of jack.
superdave31 3 months ago
Comment removed
Husapi 3 months ago
stupid play lol
elrobas 3 months ago
its not a bluff :D
fiveofakindmusic 3 months ago
@fiveofakindmusic nope... its Chuck Testa
KevboardGames 3 months ago
It's not all that of a bluff, as he actually had the best hand... But it's beautiful to see his check at the river, he knew that Staszko would bet high and really fudged staszko with his all-in.
Gabrielnfs 3 months ago in playlist Favoritos de Gabrielnfs
Thanks for watching my video guys, I appreciate it! Do not forget to rate, comment and subscribe as well as check the description to easily get free (yes, FREE) $50 to a pokersite of your choice!
TomMolivan 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
!!!Goosebumbs!!!Gänsehaut-Vide o(Pius Heinz) : /watch?v=MO5PIeZ_kZk
luapchen 3 months ago
"We're never going to see a raise from Heinz, I mean, a raise would just not make any sense whatsoever" - You called it buddy.
Number69 3 months ago
It really was a bluff! I'm not saying Heinz isn't capable of valueshoving that river in certain situations, but I'm pretty sure Heinz thinks Staszko isn't valuebetting the river with worse hands than his except maybe a worse 2 pair but he's never shoving to get paid by a worse 2 pair lol. Also if he had Staszko on a bluff he never raises
MrUndead115 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
What a risky play... He obviously would have gotten called if Staszko had the J which was more likely than a set or higher two pair. Staszko could even have had a flush... So Heinz read Stazskos hand wrong, also he would have gotten called if he read it right. Also, he could never get called by worse hand. Never.
Basicly high risk no reward...
Raappisk 3 months ago
What a risky play... He obviously would have gotten called if Staszko had the J which was more likely than a set or higher two pair. Staszko could even have had a flush... So Heinz read Stazskos hand wrong, also he would have gotten called if he read it right. Also, he could never get called by worse hand. Never.
Basicly high risk no reward...
Raappisk 3 months ago
The clicking of HeinZ's chips would drive me crazy and i would probably kill him.What are the rules?Isn't such noise forbidden on the table? He deliberately spoils Staszkos attempts to concentrate!
Ahornblatt2000 3 months ago
How can u say that wasn't a bluff? That play was so advanced that some of u railbird micro stake donks can't comprehend. BRAVO to u Heinz u have a bright future.
mirkcin 3 months ago
Wow u guys know nothing. Take it from this pro, Heinz was bluffing. He expects statsko to check all one pair hands. Stats is betting river with straight, flush,two pairs, unlikely sets, and rarely a bluff. Knowing this Heinz checks and when stats decides to bet instead of check Heinz decides to turn his hand into a bluff. Heinz knows that stats will often only call with a flush
ucla198 3 months ago 12
@ucla198 this
TomMolivan 3 months ago
@ucla198 Everyone is a poker expert on YouTube.
nutshanglotwentyfo 3 months ago 31
@nutshanglotwentyfo have you been to other parts of youtube? everyone thinks they are on expert on any and all subjects
AdamMCrawford 3 months ago
This is what I think...
Heinz had a read on Staszko there. He knew he had the best hand and could call. But he shoved... he hoped Staszko thought he had complete air... so Staszko might call with any pair... It's a great play not even some pro's might understand and no one ever tries... It's deep thinking here... Well done Pius Heinz.
Raghy07 3 months ago
thats not a bluff
Mikeploki 3 months ago
It's called bluffing with the best hand. Brilliant stuff.
djardine2520 3 months ago
What is this flag supposed to be!? It's definitely not Germany.
NewMozart 3 months ago
dobře stazsko, příště vyhraje je to psychouš, next time stazsko wil winn, he not played for money
patriotcz1 3 months ago
Was zum Teufel soll diese Flagge bei Pius?!
Odessa1983 3 months ago
@Odessa1983
in der grafik wurden die flaggen von oben beleuchtet um sie glänzend aussehen zu lassen, darum sieht das so aus
AshHousewares82 3 months ago
@Odessa1983 er is deutscher und stolz drauf.
polithans 3 months ago
@polithans und hübsch noch dazu ;)
sunshinekiwi 3 months ago
@sunshinekiwi ich finde er sieht aus wie quinten terrentino ^^
werkannderwird 3 months ago
@Odessa1983 Neben seinem Namen ist die deutsche Flagge abgezeichnet? Ist es das was du meinst?? Ich hab ähnliche Kommentare jetzt schon mehrfach gelesen hier, und ich schnallts wirklich nicht? Was meinst du/ihr? Klär mich diesbezüglich doch bitte mal auf!
OLIVIERGUERINLOUIS 3 months ago
wo ist denn da der bluff, pius hatte die bessere hand mit two pair gegen achten???
JCVDist 3 months ago
Where is here the Bluff???he had the best hand!!!lol
noreialover 3 months ago
not a fricken bluff, terrible title of this video. Bluff means you don't have squat!
daveyb420 3 months ago
@daveyb420 A bluff is when you know your hand is beat, but you think your opponent would fold to one last big bet. With a four-card straight on the board, this was definitely a bluff.
mustaineisgod96 3 months ago
loving the micro stakes analysis, so insightful haha
benj2603 3 months ago
This is a bluff. The guys at the beginning stating it isn't because he has the best hand are idiots... You can be bluffing with the best hand. It's a clear bluff... if it isn't then are you guys claiming it's a value bet? Which worse hand do you think pays off 89 there to gain value? Answer: None. Heinz thought he needed to bluff to win (as watergun put it to maybe fold out better two pairs or even sets). Don't like the play myself - if Staszko had the J its an easy (enough) call.
PhillMobile 3 months ago
@PhillMobile
I understand everything else, but why dont you like a winning move?!?
actually I do get that part too. I just think its incorrect - since you are already prooven wrong.
seabazzz 3 months ago
@seabazzz You can never say its proven wrong based on the outcome of one hand. That would be results orientated which is never a wise course to take in poker. You could say its a great read/play by Heinz but I would dispute this. He clearly THOUGHT he was beat as he could've just called and showed the winner without having to risk his entire stack. On this occasion Staszko didn't have the J but I don't think he folds that and that's why I don't like the play.
PhillMobile 3 months ago
@PhillMobile
I guess, thats why i always loose. too result orientated...
seabazzz 3 months ago
not a bluff.. and that's a really bad and risky play...
ricardo3326 3 months ago
@ricardo3326 I'm not so sure if it is a bad play... If Staszko's range is super wide on the river (which is vindicated by seeing that he called twice with A8 no draw), and he bets out a majority of his range when checked to, the checkraise shove may also fold out hands like Q10, 109, Q9 and even maybe a slowplayed set that has played this way. I also agree that given the dynamic there is no way Staszko folds a J there however...
Also it's a bluff is when you TRY to get a better hand to fold.
watergun7 3 months ago
@ricardo3326 That's the bad and risky play that made him the chip leader again.
Poker is made of risks, the best player is the one who is not afraid to take risks and do whatever it's needed to win. That's why I think makievskyi and heinz are the best players of this november nine. Ben Lamb, as I thought, turned out to be a total disappointment.
Gabrielnfs 3 months ago
@Gabrielnfs the best player is the one, who's able to do maximum +EV moves in every single situation, no matter what it is or what his state of mind is... it has nothing to do with risk, if you want to take a risk, go play a game of roulette...
matiapag 3 months ago
pius wins if he just calls so the only reason to make this play is to make staszko lay down the straight which who knows if he would beleive pius and also its possible staszko has the flush. weird play.
mikeweaver919 3 months ago
...and that's why he's playing heads up for the WSOP Championship, and Antonio is in the booth commentating...
...and I'm behind my computer screen eating Cheetos, wishing on day I'm able to afford the buy-in to this tournament.
VicenzoV 3 months ago 24
@VicenzoV me too man...me too
curuzu 3 months ago
@curuzu You too eating Cheetos? ;D
VicenzoV 3 months ago
@VicenzoV I was eating popcorn! that one u can make it in a microwave.. and saying myself "someday..."
curuzu 3 months ago
@VicenzoV
So what?
Is he WSOP chanmpion couse he is good player?
Was D.Moon good player?
LOLdonkament, just luck!
hendrixsb4444 3 months ago
Grande jogador esse heinz!
libertadoresfkf 3 months ago
Comment removed
VicenzoV 3 months ago
Comment removed
VicenzoV 3 months ago
Comment removed
VicenzoV 3 months ago
hey whats up guys, thats at least a semi bluff.
Chrisoccer83 3 months ago
LOL @ That is a bluff, hahahahaha, he happened to have the best hand? and its a bluff?! hahahahaha
element00x 3 months ago
@element00x its a bluff in his head when he check raises river since he only represents a flush.
stiflerr003 3 months ago 5
LOL @ That is a bluff, hahahahaha
element00x 3 months ago
That is a bluff, just happended to have the best hand
UsAgainsTeWorld 3 months ago
Its not a bluff stupid change the title
peppi1974 3 months ago