Bertrand Russell - Locke's Political Philosophy (1/6)

[ExEverest10]

Russell is more dismissive of Stuarts' religious differences than I'd like; a monarchical family that ruled England from 1604 until either late 17th, or early 18th Century, the two more salient figures whose religious leanings produced schisms much greater than any other Stuart's were the figures of Charles I and James II. Charles I felt strongly enough about his religious views so as to enforce a more ecclesiastic hierarchy to the Scottish church,

[ExEverest10]

which resulted in the Bishops Wars, that ultimately indebted the court and likely caused the Civil War, whereas James II's religious leanings caused him to become inexorable in temperament, causing Parliament to initiate the Glorious 'Revolution' (so-called for de facto reasons, not for de jure, or for the reason of a violent uprising). Other Stuarts' religion did not appear to be nearly as salient during their rule.

[Mike10four]

The foundation to: Locke, Hobbes and Jefferson’s work crystallizes when using science to prove our unalienable Rights are from the Laws of Nature. It becomes clear these Rights apply to all Life, from bacteria to humans, and Social systems, including Charles Darwin’s research; as in a Grand Unification principle for all Living-systems (see my channel video). The Laws of Nature trumps mortals in power; a new understanding of these Rights may help make this world a better place to live.

[jamaicanlager]

@Mike10four

SHUT UP BUTTFUCK

[Donsknotts]

@jamaicanlager lol?

[ExEverest10]

@jamaicanlager ...Not sure if genuine, or, ironic...

In case it's the former, you do know you are listening to an audiobook on Locke right now. Personal, parapgraph-long analyses should come natural to this part of YT. Just sayin'.