@iwillShockNeph Thank you for posting this. I asked the previous question to shocky months ago but he did not address it and blocked me. maybe it will get his attention here. Again, thanks.
Richey, what proof and evidence can you provide that demonstrates you are not a closeted homosexual? The leather, the effeminate voice, the lilting way in which you speak really leads me to think i am onto something with this question.
@sonofluger195 these videos exist because the origional uploader allows comments only under approval and no ratings... so this mirror allows him to see what people really think of his videos =3
Using a camera, on a bike, on a motorway, then posting it on the internet for anyone in the world to see. And in this video you question science. The irony is so mad.
If driving while using mobile phones is banned, then why can people who are obviously already a few cards short of a full deck racing around on motorcycles while preaching brain rot? The last "Jesus" this nut case will shout is when he tries to dodge some old granny he failed to spot.
What is this ranting anyway apart from a fake direct mobile communique to a non-existing fairy tale entity. (the number you dialled is out of order).
you are a fraud! the hitch, if healthy, would crush you like a grape. william craig is also a fraud, a good debater, but that does not make his claims true. craig nor you possess intellectual honesty. you make unjustifiable claims wrapped in pseudo-philosophy, much like your warped little idol, william craig. granted, hitch had an off night, but you can't say sam harris didn't expose the liar craig earlier this year. why can't people of your mind-set grow up and stop believing in ghosts?
Isn't this like talking on your cell phone while you're driving? Did anyone get his license plate? Do CA laws make it illegal to talk on your cell phone while driving? Is anyone in position to make a citizen's arrest? Shall we take anyone seriously who does this on the highway?
@davidthecook Craig's debate style does tend to make some people see him as winning debates even if there really isn't an intelligent basis for saying so. Craig's focus in debates is to make a lot of claims he can't know to be true, to misrepresent quotes from his opponent and others, and so on. His opponent then has to choose between giving their prepared remarks, or attempting to refute untrue statements Craig made. And then Craig goes back and says "my opponent couldn't answer X or Y!"
@BigMikeMcBastard Well put, sir. You're my new favorite person. There are many informal logical fallacies—one of them you named was a variation of Straw Man; another possible one is Argument from Ignorance. You hit the nail on the head. After watching the debate, I wasn't impressed by Craig's arguments because they didn't add anything new in favor of deism. Secondly, this poor videographer/motorcyclist doesn't seem to understand deductive reasoning in formal logic vs informal logic... sigh.
@iwillShockNeph Thank you for posting this. I asked the previous question to shocky months ago but he did not address it and blocked me. maybe it will get his attention here. Again, thanks.
tapesquare 5 months ago
Richey, what proof and evidence can you provide that demonstrates you are not a closeted homosexual? The leather, the effeminate voice, the lilting way in which you speak really leads me to think i am onto something with this question.
tapesquare 5 months ago
@sonofluger195 these videos exist because the origional uploader allows comments only under approval and no ratings... so this mirror allows him to see what people really think of his videos =3
iwillShockNeph 5 months ago
this is stupid
tulipsontheorgan 5 months ago
/watch?v=Xr1FVEhd_Ng
dannylucilla 5 months ago
Using a camera, on a bike, on a motorway, then posting it on the internet for anyone in the world to see. And in this video you question science. The irony is so mad.
Steoism1 5 months ago
You give delusion a new meaning!
OnWhiteLake 5 months ago 3
If driving while using mobile phones is banned, then why can people who are obviously already a few cards short of a full deck racing around on motorcycles while preaching brain rot? The last "Jesus" this nut case will shout is when he tries to dodge some old granny he failed to spot.
What is this ranting anyway apart from a fake direct mobile communique to a non-existing fairy tale entity. (the number you dialled is out of order).
Voxnulla 5 months ago
man you are a complete idiot.
MusicBoxDanceCenter 5 months ago
You don't live in the real world do you.
broomyUK 5 months ago
you are a fraud! the hitch, if healthy, would crush you like a grape. william craig is also a fraud, a good debater, but that does not make his claims true. craig nor you possess intellectual honesty. you make unjustifiable claims wrapped in pseudo-philosophy, much like your warped little idol, william craig. granted, hitch had an off night, but you can't say sam harris didn't expose the liar craig earlier this year. why can't people of your mind-set grow up and stop believing in ghosts?
ajcim 5 months ago
shit of god !!
KillTheStranger 5 months ago
Isn't this like talking on your cell phone while you're driving? Did anyone get his license plate? Do CA laws make it illegal to talk on your cell phone while driving? Is anyone in position to make a citizen's arrest? Shall we take anyone seriously who does this on the highway?
12ut5 5 months ago
Wow. I watched the entire debate over 2 hours. I would like you to show how he lost. I would also like to see your link to Matt D's unicorn rant??
davidthecook 5 months ago
@davidthecook Craig's debate style does tend to make some people see him as winning debates even if there really isn't an intelligent basis for saying so. Craig's focus in debates is to make a lot of claims he can't know to be true, to misrepresent quotes from his opponent and others, and so on. His opponent then has to choose between giving their prepared remarks, or attempting to refute untrue statements Craig made. And then Craig goes back and says "my opponent couldn't answer X or Y!"
BigMikeMcBastard 5 months ago
@BigMikeMcBastard Well put, sir. You're my new favorite person. There are many informal logical fallacies—one of them you named was a variation of Straw Man; another possible one is Argument from Ignorance. You hit the nail on the head. After watching the debate, I wasn't impressed by Craig's arguments because they didn't add anything new in favor of deism. Secondly, this poor videographer/motorcyclist doesn't seem to understand deductive reasoning in formal logic vs informal logic... sigh.
njschro 4 months ago
Shock is such a buffoon.
IrrationalOptimist 5 months ago