Wilt Magnetic Motor Testing Part Two

[christo930]

Does this guy have mental problems? Electric motors from the 1800's have many orders of magnitudes more efficient than this miscalculated mess!You could heat the room with the power you aren't measuring. There is no replacement for education. I suggest you go down to your local HS and re-enroll from when you dropped out when you were 12.

[citizen678]

At the 2010 annual meeting which took place in mid July, Mr. Herman Wilt was removed a CEO of his own company, Wilt's Clean Energy, Inc. He was removed for what appears to be a clear-cut case of misappropriating company funds for his own personal use. Herman Wilt and his motor are nothing more than a fraud.

[NotSoOldHippy]

Huh? You spent 20 years being an uneducated, ignorant, moronic cultist?

Dude! Go finish out your High School diploma and visit a public library.

Good fucking grief. You're as bad as a Scientology loon.

No offense intended.

[imaginenoreligion]

Great! 690% efficient. Now take the output hook it up to a dynamo and feed the current back into the input. Then stand back and watch as your machine grinds to a spectacular halt.

Just try it if you really believe your numbers.

I'm off now to make a motor that uses the inherent power of springs. I reckon I can beat your 690% efficiency...

[Desertphile]

Springs?! Golly, I'm going to build a motor powered by rubber bands and get over 700% efficiency! :-)

[isakel]

Is this serial? Wouldn´t the motor be able to power itself if the efficiency was larger than 100%?

[Desertphile]

One of the funny things about Lutec was that when they finally agreed to have their "over unity" device tested, they claimed an energy efficiency of "over 2,600%" but they still had to connect a battery to it before it would run. Lutec and Wilt both used the same idea for their motors, and that idea is over 714 years old: Mister Wilt didn't think of anything new.

[NathanWubs]

You fail at basic math how cute. Also you should have established a base line for 100% first before you did anything else.

[fronkenpoop]

You are delusional. Get your device tested independently. These figures are nonsense.

[ViralMessiah]

*coughbullshitCough*

[mksboysal]

RyuDarragh: Your AC Wattmeter not a good idea at all. I had a 3 PH AC motor fine tuned and was just idling at 1735 rpm. and had two 75 W indecent bulbs fully glowing using stator windings, while the watt miter fluctuated 0 to 3 watts. But the real input power was 2.2 amps at 110 volts

Watt miter it's the last tool you want to use to use measure energy devices. Best measuring tools are Amp and Volt miters

[Desertphile]

You're damn right. :-) If using alternating current, best to take the averages over time for both amps and volts. Using direct current I suppose a watt meter would be good enough. Mister Wilt does not measure power out properly, presumably because he does not want to know the correct number.

[resistanceunion]

All that life WASTED ... You could just doo nothing at that time and you would make more productive things that this .. How it could be 600% efficient thats ilogical .. it needs energy to run yet it produces more energy ?? Just WOW how irrational can you be.

[Desertphile]

Note how these "free energy" believers never plug their devices into themselves? They always have a battery or a power cord. FUNNY!

[RyuDarragh]

Did you measure the phase angle of the input AC voltage and current? You do realize that *real* power is measured in Watts and is NOT simply Volts times Amps with AC power. You must use meters calibrated in Watts and Volts RMS & measure the phase angle between the Amperes and Volts. Using an AC Wattmeter would be a really good idea. Standard AC electric motors used in small appliances, including the type used in power drills, are between 75% and 90% efficient. Lower efficiency for lower speeds.

[Desertphile]

Wilt has deleted all of his written comments.

[RyuDarragh]

That figures. The honest ones will realize they went wrong and actually ask for help. Some get too embaressed to do that, though.

[rockethead7]

If Wilt was smart enough to delete all of his own (stupid) comments, why is he not smart enough to pull down his ridiculous videos?

[Desertphile]

@rockethead7 ; Wilt has a vested interest in not having his device properly tested. It does not surprise me in the least that he declined my offer to have his device tested.

[rockethead7]

Another physics-illiterate fool that has poured countless hours into another self-delusional "invention" that actually has no purpose whatsoever.

Umm, you do know that your meter readings mean NOTHING, don't you? Ever hear of an OSCILLOSCOPE? Ever learn how to actually use one and calculate the REAL output energy?

Why is it that all of the goddamned energy nutbags don't understand that a standard meter has no hope in the world of measuring accurately on their idiot inventions?

[rockethead7]

Not to mention....

The answer is 100% simple. If it was TRULY 600% efficient, you could just tap a mere 1/6th of the energy of the output and use it to fuel the input, and create perpetual motion.

Why doesn't that work? Because it's not REALLY producing more energy out than in, and it's just that the goddamned idiot inventor doesn't understand teenage physics or that over-the-counter meters don't work on his crap.

Ugh.

Step 1: Get an education.

Step 2: Shoot yourself for being stupid.

[RyuDarragh]

Exactly, rockethead7. I have a device that produces an output power of a little ovr a megawatt. It's powered by a Lithium battery. The fact this device outputs 1000V at 1000A means it is outputting 1 million watts. It's powered by a 14.5V lithium battery pack and draws just 4 Amps. That's only 58 Watts. That's a ratio of 17,000 to 1. Of course, that fact it only outputs about a 25uS pulse, which works out to 40W/S would not penetrate the minds of "Free Energy Believers". (Oh, it's a strobe unit)

[PinkProgram]

Seems like a simpler way of proving it works than all the irrelevant tests he is doing :3 If it actually could run itself on 1/6 output then it would be worth the effort ^_^

[prhughes0]

Major error: your "output load" is no load at all.

[michamus]

Minor error in your calculations:

WMM 48:1

12.6 InV

2.7 InAmp

34.02 InW <----CORRECTION

12.8 OutW

37.62% Efiiciency

[Bozeman42]

I like the RPM vs Efficiency graph which pretty much says if you get it going fast enough, you will have a perpetual motion machine

oh shi.... just got to the end where they say they have a 600+% efficiency. wow. FAIL

[Desertphile]

Yes, it's a miracle! Achieve 666 RPMs and higher, and Satan starts pumping free energy into the device. Mr Wilt can't even bother his pretty little head with taking proper measurements.... and he STILL crows with pride at a motor with the low efficiency of 37%. Gods that's funny!

[jaaasgoed]

Tis a sad day for the world indeed...

[TilenKow]

u wilt guys dont know much about electric machinery or testing them do ya? let alone scientific method ar anything in close resemblance of one. I mean where do you get these ridiculous numbers from? jeez...

[AbdultheImpailler]

If this is so good why didn't someone come up with it decades ago? I would think that power companies would have developed and perfected this idea many years ago...

from an engineering stand point based on the video, all the clunking and banging and sudden jolting of the parts, I think this invention would self-destruct in no time when scaled up to produce large amounts of power.

How long has in been run continous?

[Zed1967]

I love this video, the fail builds and builds to the finale which is fail on epic proportions.

I think that if you build a machine to convert the fail in this video into power then you will get an efficiency of 689.9% at least.

[Desertphile]

Yep, we have a new captain for The Fail Boat. And the funniest part is, he believes that 35% efficiency is superior to common motors. Sheeeish.

[Zed1967]

@Desertphile

You have got a great singing voice DP, I think you should do a rendition of the song ''The Love Boat'' but with the lyrics ''The Fail Boat'' lmao XD

[NotSoOldHippy]

LOL! Captain of the Fail Boat. }:-}

Fucking insane that someone could spend 20 years of their life playing pretend when repeatedly smacked with the truth of science. Amazing.

[RyuDarragh]

His output power is not being measured. Where is the dynamometer? RPM is about as useful for calculating output power as measuring the RGB color value of a toasters housing to get the temperature of the wash water in the washing machine next to it. As an engineer, this setup is a kludge of useless clattering claptrap. Where is the inout AND output voltage, current and phase angle? (Phase angle is 0 for watts in DC measurements). You need a dynamometer to get Power Out. This is GiGo testing.

[4G3NTanon]

@ RyuDarragh

Yeah, what has rpm of a flywheel got to do with power out?! Even his input current measurements are flawed.

The current into the solenoids is PULSED. The ammeter only shows an average at best. Complete, ridiculous, claptrap.

[Desertphile]

As you know, there are several methods to measure pulsed current but none of them are completely accurate. The governor of California signed a law requiring electric motors to be more energy efficient, which has caused problems in complying: efficiency figures can come very close, but cannot be completely accurate. Well, according to what I've read in the recent news.

[manicdemise]

why has the amp gauge been coverd up for every test except the first?

[FredricF]

Surely this must be a joke. Right?

This must be the funniest video I have seen in a long time. The most stupid motor design ever!

[Desertphile]

I also thought it was a joke. The 0.124% efficiency figure just had me screaming with laughter.

[xtom1973]

fail!

send it over to failblog and you will be more famous as with your invention!

[anmoose]

Good gods this is funny!

BTW, if a typical home electric drill produced the power you claim to have measured, it would not be able to drill a hole in anything harder than Jello.

[Desertphile]

If "standard industry motors" really were 0.124% efficient as this genius appears to believe, an electric tooth brush would weigh 20 pounds.

[Zed1967]

@Desertphile

Women would need a shopping trolley when they wanted to buy a vibrator and an assistant from the store to help them get it into the back of their SUV.

[anmoose]

ROFL! And don't even THINK about bringing home a washing machine.

[appybuddha]

What a piece of crap. You really paid to get a patent for this?

[Desertphile]

I thought I should ask. Is this video meant to be a joke?