Vado HD vs Samsung CL65 - Video Comparison (Skydiving at Eloy)

[trunk420]

Wow, that's funny. The first person to land is me in this video. Random

[NewDirection4us]

Vado looks the best.  The other one looks washed out, dull colors, etc.

[HostileHST]

Vado is cripser in pretty much all your videos, but it's color has a tint or hue the others don't have. If it wasn't for that, I'd say Vado hands down.

Wonder if the lens on the vado is higher quality than the rest.

[APrintezis]

yes, that's exactly right .. crisp but with some high-constast and hue issues.

it is a trade off - the 3rd gen does not have the hue issue but it lost it's crispness (such a shame)

no, i don't think it is the lens, which are very nice and wide angle anyway, i think it is the compression (the data bit rate is about 8.5 Mbps), it takes a bit more memory space but the result is nicer.

[0ChrisMackle0]

@APrintezis a simple enhancer on the pc can fix all hue issues

[MauroBautista2]

Vado wins again! I love the widescreen on it!