Personally, I would have given Kate Winslett the Best Actress Award for that movie, plus, of course, the old lady who played the old lady. But the star of that James Cameron movie was, naturally, the Special Effects. Di Caprio was okay in his role, so were the others. But Ms Winslett shone brighter. Even the old lady shone brighter than Leonardo Caprio. Good God, she did!
Awesome video and excellent work. I personmally thinki it's wierd that in five minutes the dining room went from looking like a normal room to looking like it was the vatacan city. Don't think I'm cussing out this video though.
At second, no seaman would ever turn a ship and putting it full atsern at the same time. The little extra time you get is wasted multiple times byt the weaker turn, It is not a rentable deal at all. Also it is a extremely big deal for the engines, shafts and proppelors to go to full astern at full ahead. It creates very big vibration and pressure,
Unlike many belives, it was not the damage to the staboard side that claimed the ship, it only added to the rate of flooding. The serious threat was the double bottom damage. Titanics bow actually sailed over the iceberg. but the stern was saved because of the ship turning to the right after turned to the left. a maneuver called port around
Yes i know the six compartments got damage, but boiler room 5 was insignificant. The worst damage was in cargo hold 2 and 3 because it was here Titanics bottom hit the ice. Firemans tunnel and spiral staircase flooded imediataly. TItanics keel and bottom was curved upwards at the bow, that is why the iceberg first hit there.
The officers and firemen and crew fighting the flooding and operating the pumps knew it was all about holding boiler room 6. They knew if that was lost, the ship would founder. When boiler room 6 was given up and abandoned, and watertight bulkhead E partly collapsed, they knew it was over. Titanic had est. and hour left. The order evacuate and launch the lifeboats was then given. very sad
excactly, five or more compartments would have dragged the ship so much down that the top of the bulkheads came below the waterline. The tops reached only 10 feet above the waterline, to E-deck.
The pumps also kept the water at bay in both boiler rooms until 11:50 where Smith made the fatal decision to push the ship forward. The bow ploving through the Atlantic pressed the water more through the damage.This means the pumps could have kept Titanic floating for many hours, perhabs prevent the sinking completely. Other ships could have aided Titanics pumps and Titanic could have been saved. So it was one fatal order that brought Titanic to the bottom.and took the lifes of the victims.
This is not true at all. Titanic did not move once it was stopped after it hit the iceberg. The Britannic on the other had did keep going after it hit the mine. This is what helped aid in the sinking... and why the lifeboat was destroyed when it hit the moving propeller. Because the bulk heads did not extend all the way up, the water spilled over causing the Titanic to sink... sadly it covers this in the movie... watch it and learn.
I don't know where you get your information, just because you read books doesn't mean you know everything. True the Titanic movie was about the love story, but just because it had a love story does NOT mean the rest of the film was a fabrication. I have been reading and studying the Titanic since I was in 6th grade. Now that I have graduated College, I think I know a lot of information about it. You are so quick to dismiss others comments and knowledge of the greatest ship known to mankind...
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Just because your name on Youtube is "ATITANIC1992" does not mean you are the Knowledge God of the Titanic....were you even old enough to see the movie when it came out? How sad for you... lonely little person thinking they know it all.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Have you ever thought that, by gosh, you might be wrong on some simple facts about the sinking of the Titanic. The funny thing is, MOST of the books written about the Titanic have THEORIES of why it sank and how it sank. I am a Titanic Enthusiast, so you better believe I would make sure I know what I am talking about before I comment, you inconsiderate fool. Why would the captain keep the ship moving if he was in the MIDDLE of the Atlantic... COMMON SENSE IDIOT!
"Offering a radically new interpretation of the facts surrounding the most famous shipwreck in history, The Last Log of the Titanic is certain to ignite a storm of controversy." That is a review of book... Key words: INTERPRETATION. Like I said... it has theories and analysis... not complete evidence...
because Smith got "good news" the first 10 minutes after the accident. No persons was hurt, most passangers asleep, and no damage down to F og G deck. Both Ismay and Smith considered the ship practially unsinkable and Smith gave the order half or slow ahead. Smith did not really want to move the ship but Ismay pushed him. Ismay was his boss and holding of all his pension money and stuff.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
You are a complete idiot... if you watched the "Romantic" movie you would easily hear that there was NO "Left turn only". Do you really think you are smarter than anyone else in the world who loves and studies the Titanic... The funny thing is you rather argue here on youtube than write your own book on the titanic... but thats because you really don't know shit. oh and by the way, I NEVER said the ship could stop and go full astern... so STOP putting words in my mouth.
As a matter of fact, engines almost identical to those on the Titanic were used to power rolling mills, these would reverse in seconds as they needed to be able to pull the hot steel plate back through the rolling mill very quickly. If you don't believe me, I suggest you read up on the River Don engine, it could go from full speed, stop, reverse and up to full speed again in a matter of seconds. The process was featured on Fred Dibnah if you wish to see it :) Not so impossible.
milner62 i said it was called the unsinkable because it was called the unsinkable. you are right it was "practically unsinkable" but the press said unsinkable so everyone called it that.
danvidio you are wrong the titanic was called the "unsinkable" because so many rooms could be flooded and sealed off so it wouldn't sink but the water filled up more then it could to stay alfloat.
actually you are wrong Titanic was never offically called unsinkable. Every article put out about the Titanic from offical sources stated the water tight bulkheads makes Titanic "Pratically unsinkable" The news papers just dropped the pratically part and just ran with unsinkable. In all honestly Edward Wilding stated that Titanic could sink from just 12 sq ft of damage when everyone thought she had a 300 foot gash tore in her sides. he turned out to be right.
dan is possibly right. i saw it on tv also they were talking about how the boiler room exploded. they think this is what made the holes bigger. the boilers probaly did explode as you notice other ships propellers are still on when they sink. although the titanics was not. i am not lieing it is to be true. recently, as in a month ago. they are started to have new theories about the titanic.
Titanic`s screws are still attached but even IF Titanic`s boilers exploded they wouldnt have done anything to the engines or the screws. Only thing connecting the boilers to the engines are high pressure steam pipes nothing else. Like wise the boilers didnt explode. Stoker Fred Barret survived and he was in BR # 6 during the collision and urged others through the closing bulkhead door to BR #5 where he stayed operating the pumps till the coal bunker door collasped. No boilers exploded.
I wouldnt worry about the tables and chairs not moving. The tables were anchored to the floor and the chairs snapped into pegs in the floor so nothing would move in heavy seas. Same with the bed and stateroom furniture.
another wasted 4.58 of my time for some fuckin idiot wanting to look smart playing in his own little sad world of look what i can do, read how i can type and look smart..
YOU TIME WASTER, OHHH QUICK EVERYONE WATCH MY FUCKIN BORING ANIMATION, ARNT I THE SMART ONE..
actually it probably would have flooded that slowly, i mean shit it's a huge room and they say it took like almost three hours for the ship to sink completely.
Yes, because sometime before the titanic sank there was a ship ( i think it was called the arizona) that hit an iceberg and stayed afloat long enough to go in reverse back into a harbor
The only reason for that is because had the Titanic hit the Berg head on, only two watertight compartments would have been flooded, the Titanic could stay afloat with up to 4, perhaps 5 compartments completely flooded, any more and the weight would drag the ship down causing water level to rise to higher decks where there were no watertight compartments, the water flooded these areas then flooded the remaining watertight compartments from above in the sinking.
Well I hate to tell you this but you dont know your stuff. Titanic was designed to float with the first 4 compartments in the bow or the last 4 compartments in the stern. Or two compartments adjoined side by side anywheres else. This is fairly easy information to find.
Now I didnt want to say this and risk having someone bitching about me bragging but since I have been researching the Titanic since 1994, I have numerous books and numerous sources including orignal Harland & Wolff that says youre wrong on that.
Thats a true fact, i watched a study last night on national geographic and it said the Titanic was powerfull enough the break the shit out of the iceberg with a head on collision.
im standing there *looks at watch impatiently* "bloomin hek whens this boat gonna sink" im not being offensive or disrespectful to the people that died that night i was just saying by the way coool video
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Are you a complete idiot? There were no lamps in the first class dining room, just fixtures situated on the ceiling. It was also incredibly boring and a waste of my time.
Not trying to be rude just informative but in all honesty the portside D-Deck gangway door was left open thats a large 12 sq foot opening water would be coming in so the Dinning Saloon on D-Deck just aft of the D-Deck Reception room which is flooding as the D-Deck gangway door goes under water would be moderatly fast cause water would be pouring down the grand staircase from D-Deck to E-Deck.
Who cares.. You guys are so boring with these same comments over and over again. If your life is so precious then dont lose time on writing stupid comments
you know what, i thought it was really well done. it may have been slow, but it made up for it in detail and precision. good job, and i hope you'll make more like it!!!
good job on this video! my names Megan, kinda feelin bored if any1 wants to join me on cam or wana chat i will be signed on at __ PLAY-CAM...dot...COM __ my user ID there is Megan_pxuxahhpuv chat soon xx its FR33 to j0in! mwah
I think it shows us all something when the people who are trashing this video can't even spell. I agree with the comment "this wasn't intended for the average viewer"
The carpet in the dining is the exact same one as the Maria Doria from Tomb Raider 2.
AdamDawson3 1 month ago
I thought this was a popup
Xxmakalynn2000xX 1 month ago
.this one's nice..i'll wait for ur next video.
Novvenguy 2 months ago
Personally, I would have given Kate Winslett the Best Actress Award for that movie, plus, of course, the old lady who played the old lady. But the star of that James Cameron movie was, naturally, the Special Effects. Di Caprio was okay in his role, so were the others. But Ms Winslett shone brighter. Even the old lady shone brighter than Leonardo Caprio. Good God, she did!
squirell1952 7 months ago
pretty impressive from scratch
blueberrycakecz 8 months ago
wow dude you are sick awsome video
Ferrarifanlellewtc 8 months ago
It wuz impressive for making it from scratch and it looked pretty time consuming so congrats
kristikool299 8 months ago
wow! awesome video man!
diceplayaLOL 9 months ago
i used my imagination and pretend i was someone who refused to leave
MrTitanic123456789 10 months ago
I sucks so badly
Finz250 1 year ago
@Finz250 I don't see you making graphics.
WindowsNetworkhelper 1 year ago
@Finz250 You do?
royalcourtier 10 months ago
Even if it wasn't perfect, you did a good job guy. Must have taken a long time to create!
I better get some thumbs up though! :D
JacqueDupond 1 year ago
This Was Actually Interesting(= Nice Job Dude! his Video Mustve tooken forever to make so VERY AWSOME NICE JOB!! Thumbs Up If You Agree!!
jazzylovesth 1 year ago 2
Awesome video and excellent work. I personmally thinki it's wierd that in five minutes the dining room went from looking like a normal room to looking like it was the vatacan city. Don't think I'm cussing out this video though.
VicTheMouth 1 year ago
to long =/
leertast 1 year ago
very good from scratch you should make a full video
Chargerdaytona69 1 year ago
WTF
Rinskesmiles 1 year ago
Boring!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
aureon99 1 year ago
and the engine, shaft or proppelor i mentioned can break and become very expensive.
When you reverse the proppelors, you interrupt the crucial water flow to the rudder, making the ships turn very inefficient
ATITANIC1992 1 year ago
At second, no seaman would ever turn a ship and putting it full atsern at the same time. The little extra time you get is wasted multiple times byt the weaker turn, It is not a rentable deal at all. Also it is a extremely big deal for the engines, shafts and proppelors to go to full astern at full ahead. It creates very big vibration and pressure,
ATITANIC1992 1 year ago
i know this movie by heart and im young just try and test me :P
ggluv23 2 years ago
@ggluv23 What is the name of the relevant ship?
( i tryed to figure out a question matching your level of intelligence)
ATITANIC1992 1 year ago
Unlike many belives, it was not the damage to the staboard side that claimed the ship, it only added to the rate of flooding. The serious threat was the double bottom damage. Titanics bow actually sailed over the iceberg. but the stern was saved because of the ship turning to the right after turned to the left. a maneuver called port around
ATITANIC1992 2 years ago
Yes i know the six compartments got damage, but boiler room 5 was insignificant. The worst damage was in cargo hold 2 and 3 because it was here Titanics bottom hit the ice. Firemans tunnel and spiral staircase flooded imediataly. TItanics keel and bottom was curved upwards at the bow, that is why the iceberg first hit there.
ATITANIC1992 2 years ago
The officers and firemen and crew fighting the flooding and operating the pumps knew it was all about holding boiler room 6. They knew if that was lost, the ship would founder. When boiler room 6 was given up and abandoned, and watertight bulkhead E partly collapsed, they knew it was over. Titanic had est. and hour left. The order evacuate and launch the lifeboats was then given. very sad
ATITANIC1992 2 years ago
wait.... it wouldve sank when 5 compartments were flooded rite?
07Blackhawk 2 years ago
excactly, five or more compartments would have dragged the ship so much down that the top of the bulkheads came below the waterline. The tops reached only 10 feet above the waterline, to E-deck.
ATITANIC1992 2 years ago
The pumps also kept the water at bay in both boiler rooms until 11:50 where Smith made the fatal decision to push the ship forward. The bow ploving through the Atlantic pressed the water more through the damage.This means the pumps could have kept Titanic floating for many hours, perhabs prevent the sinking completely. Other ships could have aided Titanics pumps and Titanic could have been saved. So it was one fatal order that brought Titanic to the bottom.and took the lifes of the victims.
ATITANIC1992 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
This is not true at all. Titanic did not move once it was stopped after it hit the iceberg. The Britannic on the other had did keep going after it hit the mine. This is what helped aid in the sinking... and why the lifeboat was destroyed when it hit the moving propeller. Because the bulk heads did not extend all the way up, the water spilled over causing the Titanic to sink... sadly it covers this in the movie... watch it and learn.
gcmale 2 years ago
Yaaf and i dont even wanna watch my time on you. omg you deni the most simple facts.Read some books and learn instead of watching the love movie.
you are a shame to the Titanic enthusiast
ATITANIC1992 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I don't know where you get your information, just because you read books doesn't mean you know everything. True the Titanic movie was about the love story, but just because it had a love story does NOT mean the rest of the film was a fabrication. I have been reading and studying the Titanic since I was in 6th grade. Now that I have graduated College, I think I know a lot of information about it. You are so quick to dismiss others comments and knowledge of the greatest ship known to mankind...
gcmale 2 years ago
the greatest ship known to mankind, though unknown to you lol
ATITANIC1992 2 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Just because your name on Youtube is "ATITANIC1992" does not mean you are the Knowledge God of the Titanic....were you even old enough to see the movie when it came out? How sad for you... lonely little person thinking they know it all.
gcmale 2 years ago
waste*
ATITANIC1992 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Have you ever thought that, by gosh, you might be wrong on some simple facts about the sinking of the Titanic. The funny thing is, MOST of the books written about the Titanic have THEORIES of why it sank and how it sank. I am a Titanic Enthusiast, so you better believe I would make sure I know what I am talking about before I comment, you inconsiderate fool. Why would the captain keep the ship moving if he was in the MIDDLE of the Atlantic... COMMON SENSE IDIOT!
gcmale 2 years ago
read The last log of Titanic
and you wont have to apologize pretty
ATITANIC1992 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
"Offering a radically new interpretation of the facts surrounding the most famous shipwreck in history, The Last Log of the Titanic is certain to ignite a storm of controversy." That is a review of book... Key words: INTERPRETATION. Like I said... it has theories and analysis... not complete evidence...
gcmale 2 years ago
because Smith got "good news" the first 10 minutes after the accident. No persons was hurt, most passangers asleep, and no damage down to F og G deck. Both Ismay and Smith considered the ship practially unsinkable and Smith gave the order half or slow ahead. Smith did not really want to move the ship but Ismay pushed him. Ismay was his boss and holding of all his pension money and stuff.
ATITANIC1992 2 years ago 2
Smith and Ismay also got the news that the pumps could deal with the water intake.
Ismay saw good oportunities in the accident and could see the front pages in his mind
"Titanic steams under own power to halifax after iceberg collision"
That would be very good press coverage and would have underlined the unsikablilty of the olympic class liners
ATITANIC1992 2 years ago 2
Do you know what common sense is?
NOT to turn hard a port and reverse engines at the same time.
No seaman in the world would ever do that to avoid a colission, and Murdock did not do that either.
Do you really believe in the movies romantic "left turn only" scenario
hahaha
it is impossible
and you also believe that one of the worlds biggest steam engines could stop from full ahead and go in full astern in a minute lol
Apparently you dont know anything about engineering or seafaring. poor you
ATITANIC1992 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
You are a complete idiot... if you watched the "Romantic" movie you would easily hear that there was NO "Left turn only". Do you really think you are smarter than anyone else in the world who loves and studies the Titanic... The funny thing is you rather argue here on youtube than write your own book on the titanic... but thats because you really don't know shit. oh and by the way, I NEVER said the ship could stop and go full astern... so STOP putting words in my mouth.
gcmale 2 years ago
@ATITANIC1992
As a matter of fact, engines almost identical to those on the Titanic were used to power rolling mills, these would reverse in seconds as they needed to be able to pull the hot steel plate back through the rolling mill very quickly. If you don't believe me, I suggest you read up on the River Don engine, it could go from full speed, stop, reverse and up to full speed again in a matter of seconds. The process was featured on Fred Dibnah if you wish to see it :) Not so impossible.
Bringbackthempire 1 year ago
look at all of the stuff going up!
zmandr01 2 years ago
how do they know all this water happening ps warning it may be fake! and yes it did take ten mins to the boat to sink
zmandr01 2 years ago
very well done mate
shaun1912 2 years ago
milner62 i said it was called the unsinkable because it was called the unsinkable. you are right it was "practically unsinkable" but the press said unsinkable so everyone called it that.
qeaqk11 2 years ago
danvidio you are wrong the titanic was called the "unsinkable" because so many rooms could be flooded and sealed off so it wouldn't sink but the water filled up more then it could to stay alfloat.
qeaqk11 2 years ago
actually you are wrong Titanic was never offically called unsinkable. Every article put out about the Titanic from offical sources stated the water tight bulkheads makes Titanic "Pratically unsinkable" The news papers just dropped the pratically part and just ran with unsinkable. In all honestly Edward Wilding stated that Titanic could sink from just 12 sq ft of damage when everyone thought she had a 300 foot gash tore in her sides. he turned out to be right.
Milner62 2 years ago
dan is possibly right. i saw it on tv also they were talking about how the boiler room exploded. they think this is what made the holes bigger. the boilers probaly did explode as you notice other ships propellers are still on when they sink. although the titanics was not. i am not lieing it is to be true. recently, as in a month ago. they are started to have new theories about the titanic.
theboynextstore 2 years ago
Titanic`s screws are still attached but even IF Titanic`s boilers exploded they wouldnt have done anything to the engines or the screws. Only thing connecting the boilers to the engines are high pressure steam pipes nothing else. Like wise the boilers didnt explode. Stoker Fred Barret survived and he was in BR # 6 during the collision and urged others through the closing bulkhead door to BR #5 where he stayed operating the pumps till the coal bunker door collasped. No boilers exploded.
Milner62 2 years ago
well thats what i heard on tv...... but yea who can trust tv anymore lol
danvidio 2 years ago 3
i think this grand. i enjoyed it very much!
88pianobuff 2 years ago 6
the reason why it sunk is because the boilers the ice happened to hit exploded making the hole 10 times bigger.
danvidio 2 years ago
it did?
xwingdude95 2 years ago
is this true or false?
optimus8387 2 years ago
that is very good! this video shows the actual sinking speed nd flooding speed of the inside half way during the sinking!
awsome!
clctitanic 2 years ago 4
Good job! that is probably around the rate that the actual room sank.
kbaseballboy765 2 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Waste of my life....
Jacob2913 2 years ago
No one held the barrel of a gun to your head to make you watch this, you know.
DavoHardy89 2 years ago 3
wow! its like someone just stood there and kept taking pictures
really good!
roscropoor13 2 years ago 8
did he died?
junkmailboy1000 2 years ago 2
I agree with you. I think that the video is not supposed to be action and cool because the Titanic was a sad moment for the passengers and crew.
NASCARINATOR 2 years ago 2
What is that game??
Please tell me ! ;)
sebek117 2 years ago
what program did u use to make this??????
wiiboy34 2 years ago
I wouldnt worry about the tables and chairs not moving. The tables were anchored to the floor and the chairs snapped into pegs in the floor so nothing would move in heavy seas. Same with the bed and stateroom furniture.
Milner62 2 years ago 3
it took exactly 5 minutes t\for a dinjing room to sink? nice vid
mastermind1400 2 years ago 5
i think that's actuall pretty accurate tho.. but wat do i no? im only 13.
TOTALmusicFREAK21 2 years ago 7
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Oh, good at leats the passengers had time to finish their meals befpre going to the boat drck.
rdvd7 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
another wasted 4.58 of my time for some fuckin idiot wanting to look smart playing in his own little sad world of look what i can do, read how i can type and look smart..
YOU TIME WASTER, OHHH QUICK EVERYONE WATCH MY FUCKIN BORING ANIMATION, ARNT I THE SMART ONE..
NOPE YOU ARE SAD
markcarrickarea 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
stupid
firemanrady 3 years ago
actually it probably would have flooded that slowly, i mean shit it's a huge room and they say it took like almost three hours for the ship to sink completely.
xXOverkill 3 years ago 74
yeah and it might have taken longer for some of the inner rooms to completely flooded.
TOTALmusicFREAK21 2 years ago 6
@xXOverkill it was one foot a sec to
tgiacin435 1 year ago
@xXOverkill it took 2 hours for the ship to sink,to be precise.
ShipWreckAndHaloFan 8 months ago
@ShipWreckAndHaloFan to be even 'more precise' it took 2 hours and 40 minutes ;)
kekahkooproductions 6 months ago
very good video and interesting concept.
GhostofBrianJones 3 years ago 35
probly was like this : wake me up when the water gets over here
Willettes1 3 years ago 37
what if the titanic didn't sink?
0090002883 3 years ago 29
we would have never heard about it and it would have been scrapped like the olympic
shazmeister2005 2 years ago
Some people think that if the titanic would have hit the iceberg straight on then it would have stayed afloat long enough for help to arrive.
blackcherrysoda91 2 years ago 3
Yes, because sometime before the titanic sank there was a ship ( i think it was called the arizona) that hit an iceberg and stayed afloat long enough to go in reverse back into a harbor
kbaseballboy765 2 years ago 3
Thats because the bow of the titanic was reinforced, and was made to withstand something like that.
naxa321 2 years ago
Titanic`s bow was never reinforced to withstand a collision with an ice berg. She was a passengership not an icebreaker.
Milner62 2 years ago
The only reason for that is because had the Titanic hit the Berg head on, only two watertight compartments would have been flooded, the Titanic could stay afloat with up to 4, perhaps 5 compartments completely flooded, any more and the weight would drag the ship down causing water level to rise to higher decks where there were no watertight compartments, the water flooded these areas then flooded the remaining watertight compartments from above in the sinking.
kaosobsidian 2 years ago
il make it clear for you
she couldnt take 5 compartments. thats what did her in the end
what she was capable of was:
1.the front 2 compartments flooding
2.or, any 4 others; including the first 2
1999UTD 2 years ago
Im well aware of that......I said she could stay afloat with UP TO 4 compartments flooded PERHAPS 5, and the berg actuall punctured 6 compartments :)
kaosobsidian 2 years ago
Only 5 watertight compartments got damaged, not 6 as some of you state.
ATITANIC1992 2 years ago
@ATITANIC1992 the real problem is the rudder was to small to turn such a huge ship rip
MegaSLIMBOYFAT 2 years ago
Actually Titanic could take two compartments side by side anywheres or the first 4 at either end of the ship. Titanic took 6 damaged in the bow.
Milner62 2 years ago
your questioning me?
no offense, but i know my stuff
trust me
1999UTD 2 years ago
Well I hate to tell you this but you dont know your stuff. Titanic was designed to float with the first 4 compartments in the bow or the last 4 compartments in the stern. Or two compartments adjoined side by side anywheres else. This is fairly easy information to find.
Milner62 2 years ago
Now I didnt want to say this and risk having someone bitching about me bragging but since I have been researching the Titanic since 1994, I have numerous books and numerous sources including orignal Harland & Wolff that says youre wrong on that.
Milner62 2 years ago
(sigh).....
yeah, ok your right (Y)
1999UTD 2 years ago
Thats a true fact, i watched a study last night on national geographic and it said the Titanic was powerfull enough the break the shit out of the iceberg with a head on collision.
jarrodbain3 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
to slow
bubblytashax 3 years ago
AW for all the people who got killed on that boat bless your souls and rest peacefully
Bdg333 3 years ago 30
im standing there *looks at watch impatiently* "bloomin hek whens this boat gonna sink" im not being offensive or disrespectful to the people that died that night i was just saying by the way coool video
josh2k765 3 years ago 7
I think the slow-motion makes it scarier. You slowly see what you would've if you were in that room. It actually freaked me out.
jacnar 3 years ago
its slow but very very good
send me an message on a guild to make on please
donlite 3 years ago 2
hi . .
randomname200708 3 years ago
sweet =]
MoovieMakerooni 3 years ago
this is for all of the harsh comments LETS SEE YOU ALL DO BETTER! Anyway nice video
FreedomSoldier23 3 years ago
this is probably the actual time it would have taken to flood
toby099 3 years ago
It's too long and slowly!!!
Sissolina987 3 years ago
Well don't be such an igorant kid and wait.
BobbyDobby 3 years ago
yah what BobbyDobby
MysterousStranger 3 years ago
That makes no sense dude...
BobbyDobby 3 years ago
i meant to say yah what BobbyDobby said but i forgot said srry...
MysterousStranger 3 years ago
well if it's boring and to long then don't watch it simple. Atleast he's tried to show how the dining room sinks
samori67 3 years ago
it is sokesh takes to long
lollegos 3 years ago
for those who watched all the video congrats
ParanoidFreax 3 years ago
euhh photos are extremlee long BoRiNg
ParanoidFreax 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Are you a complete idiot? There were no lamps in the first class dining room, just fixtures situated on the ceiling. It was also incredibly boring and a waste of my time.
philipholas 3 years ago
ehm is this a video or a screenshot ?
OlioPL 3 years ago
Not trying to be rude just informative but in all honesty the portside D-Deck gangway door was left open thats a large 12 sq foot opening water would be coming in so the Dinning Saloon on D-Deck just aft of the D-Deck Reception room which is flooding as the D-Deck gangway door goes under water would be moderatly fast cause water would be pouring down the grand staircase from D-Deck to E-Deck.
Milner62 3 years ago
i think that was a bit boring :S it just took a long time to flood thats all
skateryenny 3 years ago
>>>have been flooded in 10 seconds
meedndawn 3 years ago
the water would stream alot faster then that
like 10-20ft a second a second so too your 100ft in length thing that is nothing at all would
meedndawn 3 years ago
i love the titanic
PhantomOfTheOpera34 3 years ago 2
did you yse sims 2
olivehead33 3 years ago
BORING!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
firebreathinghottie5 3 years ago
AWESOME!!
magikarpyop 3 years ago
ok....aaand.......who are u again???
Willyster 3 years ago
shoot me D: im so bored.... bored out my fuken skull...... arrrrgg SINK ALREADY
HABdude13 3 years ago 2
wat the fuk its so boring i cant even be botherd to watch it sink :S
jasfifty 3 years ago
i don't know whats worse,being crushed by tons and tons of steel,or drowning
kingdarius1996 3 years ago 2
drowing i think cause it hurts to hold your breath and and then breath it in if u were crush by tons of steel u would die almost instancly
bearycool 3 years ago
ill never get those 5 minutes of my life back wasted watching this
Kiefty 3 years ago
Who cares.. You guys are so boring with these same comments over and over again. If your life is so precious then dont lose time on writing stupid comments
crodark91 3 years ago
pero que perdida de tiempo jilipollas de mierda
123sorete123 3 years ago
cool
johanbok1993 3 years ago
A little time wasting, but nonetheless a very godd interpretation.
I really hope to see the 2 and some hour video.
It'll be much better to see the full thing, to realize the true horror of the monstrous sinking ship.
:)
kingfdragon 3 years ago 2
really good
cheekydogss 3 years ago
great job.............
mchboy1 3 years ago
good but a little boring...
Nety171990 3 years ago
very well done i love it
santahat111 3 years ago
cool but long lol
blueyblue97 3 years ago
cool
callmo123 3 years ago 2
You did a great job! People do put harsh comments but I think it was awesome to watch
bobthemagical 3 years ago 5
This comment has received too many negative votes show
talk about slow motion that was the longest four minutes of my life...
Speedle5656 3 years ago
very well animaed
evanbearpride 3 years ago
you know what, i thought it was really well done. it may have been slow, but it made up for it in detail and precision. good job, and i hope you'll make more like it!!!
cyruscanuk 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
good job on this video! my names Megan, kinda feelin bored if any1 wants to join me on cam or wana chat i will be signed on at __ PLAY-CAM...dot...COM __ my user ID there is Megan_pxuxahhpuv chat soon xx its FR33 to j0in! mwah
lkzsanches 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Nice Video lolz, my names Destiny, im feelin n0rty and h0rn3y if any guyz wana chat im usually on
___ FriendlyFlirts..dot..COM ___ my username there is Destiny-bvcstvqlibd chat soon ;)
hmhm 3 years ago
thank you for posting this ^-^
really nice =]
poseidonrocks123 3 years ago
I think it is great and you should congratulate CorvatChauveSouris who have made it.
KonstandinosP 3 years ago 4
This comment has received too many negative votes show
SLO-MO WALK 4 UR LIFEEE!!!! *whoahhhhhhhooo* wow this is thooper thcary mum!!!!!!!! help meeeeeee!!
fishstikzzz 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Your horrible
callmo123 3 years ago
I think it shows us all something when the people who are trashing this video can't even spell. I agree with the comment "this wasn't intended for the average viewer"
beesyboo 3 years ago 4
now everyone please stop making harsh comments...
007JaMeS0BoNd007 3 years ago
its slow but its still cool to see the dinning room flood i have wanted to see how it flooded for a long time
HewieOfHG 3 years ago
people, why must you be so harsh? As somebody else said, make a better one yourself and stop tearing apart somebody else's work.
beesyboo 3 years ago
Yeah i aggree with beesyboo! Why?
007JaMeS0BoNd007 3 years ago
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ......
Gass08 3 years ago
dont!!!
007JaMeS0BoNd007 3 years ago
everything floated away besides the tables
stewie13 3 years ago
yeah...why is that?
007JaMeS0BoNd007 3 years ago
I was trying to decide between watching this or watching paint dry. I really should have went with the paint.
pyronaught 3 years ago
HEY DONT SAY THAT!!!!1 its really rude!!!!
007JaMeS0BoNd007 3 years ago
dont
007JaMeS0BoNd007 3 years ago
u suck and i rad wat u put
Javier9507 3 years ago
DONT I DARE U TO DO IT AGAIN!!!
007JaMeS0BoNd007 3 years ago
if you wonder how the graphics made it made with floorpan 3d i got it!
tictacnac 3 years ago
my last comment was for that satans angel guy
flyboy1945 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
the dining room did not filll with water lil by lil so slow, it filled up rapidly, i saw da movie
SatansAngel231 4 years ago
ur stupid just because it was like that in "da" movie doesnt mean it was like that in real life also jack and rose from "da" movie didnt exist
flyboy1945 3 years ago 2
ok sure its just a movie, but u think it just came in taking 4 mins, it filled in like seconds. and the furniture was not bolted on either...
SatansAngel231 3 years ago
the dining room did not sink in seconds because the titanic was at an angle and the water didn't climb up the dining room.
DrinkOmally 3 years ago
DrinkOmally u are completely correct
Jarrodsparrowpotc 3 years ago
"ok sure its just a movie, but u think it just came in taking 4 mins, it filled in like seconds. and the furniture was not bolted on either..."
Large ships don't sink in seconds. They take hours.
retrogamer500 3 years ago