The state should not have the power to decide what substances people can or cannot take, it's against our basic rights as a human being and quite frankly I find it insulting. Ann Widdecombe is a fucking retard.
The choice to use drugs or not use them is strictly an individual choice or decision & people will take drugs whether or not it is legalized. Drug dealers make extraordinary profits and keep strife going in the streets in the act of peddling these illegal goods.The argument for legalization has some merit. However,a society only has lots of people who resort to drugs and alcohol when the society itself does not live up to decent standards...i.e. it is a "warring" society and one "unenlightened"!
He didn't destroy her in the slightest. Her points aren't perfect, but neither are his. Personally, I can't stand both of the sides. I hate the ignorant conservatives and I hate the naive hippies. Both of the sides are equally retarded.
What this bitch doesn't understand is that a healthy portion of the populace will always want to experiment with drugs in order to "see what's out there", and partly because the fucking lame adults of this world have created a fucking shitshow of a world where ownership (of stupid shit) confers rank on people, and it doesn't pay to be smarter, to have better education systems etc... because all that will do is create tension in peoples' minds b/c of the inability to induce positive change.
I lived in Brazil for some time and there taking drugs was and is very dangerous, but it wasn't because of the actual drugs but because of the people that you got involved with. No doubt in my mind that it will be legalized.
Clearly the old lady doesn't know what she's talking about. She made no sense whatsoever. Everything she said was either illogical or unsupported and/or contradicted by research. The gateway theory has been debunked long ago, quit harping on it already. Frankly, I think she's quite mad. She was so illogical, that I am compelled to suspect that she is on some drug trafficker's pay-roll. The violent trafficker's are the only ones benefiting from prohibition right now. Be wise, legalise!
3:09 - "The state is going to be making available to everybody, their first experience of heroin" - Yes. That's right. Basically we're won't be compounding troubled people problems further by sending them to prison for simply altering their conscienceness in a way that's harmful ONLY to themselves. It's called freedom of choice. Of course, being a Tory, you're against that idea, aren't you Anne?
7:58 - "What you're niaively assuming is: legalise it and all the gangster fade away." - There's nothing niaive about that, Anne! It's exactly what would happen.
Dealers charge heavily for putting their necks on the line. If everybody could legally grow cannabis in their attic, shed or greenhouse, there'd be no easy profit for dealers.
"Complete nonsense" would be to assume that gansters would remain in an industry that they're not profitting from!!
7:08 - "Cannabis Psychosis". Another complete myth. Studies have shown there's a direct corrolation between cannabis users and people who at some point in there life suffered from mental health problems (depression, stress etc). People who bandy this statistic as proof of an adverse effect of the herb are forgetting that it's also a known fact that people with mental health problems are more likely to try cannabis. Hence the origin of the correlation! Mental illness is a CAUSE, NOT an effect!
2:48 - Ann says "We also KNOW that a certain percentage of people go through the gateway from soft to hard drugs". It's so frustrating when a trend of thought becomes accepted as fact such as the "gateway theory"!
I know A LOT of people who regularly use cannabis and have never touched anything stronger (except alcohol, obviously; but that's not a "real drug" is it?). It's in the region of about 50 people. Only ONE has had an addiction problem and he never touched a joint before-hand!!
Such ignorant and hypocritical individuals. As the International community has celebrated the war on drugs. The UN needs to consider enforcing the legal use of marijuana a international recognized narcotic; regarding the UN charters and the breach of peace it produces.
a drugs debate with Ann Widecombe? How can someone who doesn't understand being a druggie comment on it. It's like asking a mexican to comment on being english, it's ridiculous. Of course people will be tempted to experiment with drugs if they feel miserable and trapped in their life, which means we should'nt be letting these illegal aliens through our doors who are flooding our streets with drugs. The government are doing this to own children this moronic labour government
Those who support continuing "drug war" prohibition are one of three types:-
1. Cops & Prison Guards. The cop unions know an end to the WoD would cut the crime rate massively. Unemployed cops on welfare, or hire slick PR for a dirty fight lying to the people?
2. The drug cartels. Dont think the drug cartels can't fund prohibitionist politicians via 3rd parties.
3. Those who haven't researched the truth yet, or those suckered by the fear based propaganda & lies of one of the above two groups.
"the bar will be removed..." 2 seconds after they talked about the WHO study showing NO correlation between harshness of drug laws and rates of usage. People in support of prohibition are EXTREMELY selective in what they CHOOSE to hear. It's fucking frustrating when there's so much emotion involved in a theme. Debating drug legalisation is very much like discussing politics and religion.
The prevelence of drug harms is a product of the policy base that exists now. Widicombe suggests Rowles is 'mad' - whereas the madness is maintaining the policy that serves to produce the very harms it sets out to solve. Widicombe needs to learn some simple rules of debate, repeating as she did her assertions and opinions doesnt make them more 'factual'. Fmr UK Drugs Advisor, Julian Critchley's informed view on what is broken is where the drug policy debate needs to head.
I believe god gave me the right to grow marijuana, and the greedy DEA is trying to take that right away. Next thing you know they're gonna have a new law against unhealthy foods, and a bunch of Govt dickheads trying to convince me why not to legalize pork chops because it makes people obese. This war on drugs is only still going on because the DEA is trying to pretend like they still need to exist. Lets just get rid of the DEA and get Ron Paul for President in 2012!
How is alcohol not a gateway "drug"? How many drunken fools have been a t a party and said , Hell yeah gimmie a bump of that cocaine it looks fun. IM drunk what the hell.
Look at this lady. Listen to her. Is this what you want for our future? This has been going on since Reagan. Why can't people rise up and put a stop to it? I like to respect people. I try to whenever possible. Sometimes, however, people have to be told their standing is not what they think it ought to be. Just because you're old and wealthy does not mean you're right.
Legalize drugs! Drug addicts then won´t have to rob people on the streets of your city, rob your cars and prostitute themselfs so they can buy a meth or something!
Great News for America amd mankind Brooklyn NY A man from San Juan, Puerto Rico Selling T-shirts 22 dollars 1000 sold in three days The T-shirts have my photo of me from online The Shirt says: Google Jeff Bootstraps Fisher Friend for all of Puerto Rico y mankind I will be at the cigar store if anyone wants to take new photos. M-F 2 pm to 5 pm 140 Mulberry Street Littly Italy Cigar Store
If there was not a extraordinary hunger for drugs, there would be no problem. The US needs to focus on those who are hungry and NOT on those who supply.
This just like Sky News. Very disappointing for Al Jazeera (which should be representing drug producing countries). Maybe it is just the usual absurd taboo about drug legislation that disallows reasoned debate? I don't know but one star from me I'm afraid.
This woman believes the Police Propaganda, and refuses to listen to the facts. She also believes, as Tim Leary pointed out long ago, that drugs are far more powerful than they actually are.
The state should not have the power to decide what substances people can or cannot take, it's against our basic rights as a human being and quite frankly I find it insulting. Ann Widdecombe is a fucking retard.
meelzonweelz69 4 weeks ago
Come on Anne, we all know you secretly smoke crack.
Jaoric 9 months ago
Why does anne widdecombe think that she can win an argument just by using condescending rhetoric and arrogant mis-informed opinion rather then fact?
neondistractions 10 months ago 2
The choice to use drugs or not use them is strictly an individual choice or decision & people will take drugs whether or not it is legalized. Drug dealers make extraordinary profits and keep strife going in the streets in the act of peddling these illegal goods.The argument for legalization has some merit. However,a society only has lots of people who resort to drugs and alcohol when the society itself does not live up to decent standards...i.e. it is a "warring" society and one "unenlightened"!
reachhigh10 11 months ago
the guy isn't naive u r.
chuimistro 11 months ago
Stupid fat bitch go back to 1950s with your authoritan attitude!
tehparol 11 months ago
did it just get frosty here?
tonybeir 11 months ago
lol what a stupid keeping up apperances bitch.
splendidmate 11 months ago 4
if heroin was legal i would not use it
marsbui87 11 months ago 5
wow that woman is in parliament? jesus no wonder there are so many arbitrary and outdated laws
jimmyPain2121 11 months ago 2
this woman is a fuckhead.
This is what is wrong with the world
barnyisextinct 11 months ago 7
She sounds like a nonsensical chicken clucking when she talks.
VGElites 11 months ago 5
He didn't destroy her in the slightest. Her points aren't perfect, but neither are his. Personally, I can't stand both of the sides. I hate the ignorant conservatives and I hate the naive hippies. Both of the sides are equally retarded.
Dimak666 11 months ago
@Dimak666 I am glad you found a way to feel superior to both sides without actually helping the debate. The truth is not always in the middle.
tonybeir 11 months ago
@tonybeir Not always, but in this case it is.
Dimak666 11 months ago
@Dimak666 You're a dumbass for thinking the man was a "naive HIPPIE". I can't take you seriously.
tehparol 11 months ago
@tehparol I don't want you to take me seriously. You're not a serious man.
Dimak666 11 months ago
anne widdecombe irritates me so much
Milky1944 11 months ago
What this bitch doesn't understand is that a healthy portion of the populace will always want to experiment with drugs in order to "see what's out there", and partly because the fucking lame adults of this world have created a fucking shitshow of a world where ownership (of stupid shit) confers rank on people, and it doesn't pay to be smarter, to have better education systems etc... because all that will do is create tension in peoples' minds b/c of the inability to induce positive change.
missingt00th 1 year ago
Did you know that Taliban is anti heroin and when we started killing them off the heroin market grew.
People hate it when bring logic to the table^^
blackashell13 1 year ago
DO YOU WANT TO LEGALISE HEROIN
DO YOU WANT TO LEGALISE HEROIN
DO YOU WANT TO LEGALISE HEROIN
YES
lukespooky 1 year ago 2
I lived in Brazil for some time and there taking drugs was and is very dangerous, but it wasn't because of the actual drugs but because of the people that you got involved with. No doubt in my mind that it will be legalized.
thundermorphine 1 year ago
"Common sense say..." followed by a series of hypotheses of what 'would' happen or 'could' happen, which is always the worst case scenario.
Why does anyone still ask Anne Widdicombe what she thinks?
tigerone1970 2 years ago
He hits a home run at 7:45
emilyalp 2 years ago 2
So legalising soft drugs would make people swith to hard drugs AND soft drugs? Her logic is impeccable.
Great that this debate is on primetime television.
Sondre7 2 years ago
Clearly the old lady doesn't know what she's talking about. She made no sense whatsoever. Everything she said was either illogical or unsupported and/or contradicted by research. The gateway theory has been debunked long ago, quit harping on it already. Frankly, I think she's quite mad. She was so illogical, that I am compelled to suspect that she is on some drug trafficker's pay-roll. The violent trafficker's are the only ones benefiting from prohibition right now. Be wise, legalise!
hrmIwonder 2 years ago
3:09 - "The state is going to be making available to everybody, their first experience of heroin" - Yes. That's right. Basically we're won't be compounding troubled people problems further by sending them to prison for simply altering their conscienceness in a way that's harmful ONLY to themselves. It's called freedom of choice. Of course, being a Tory, you're against that idea, aren't you Anne?
psychodelicfungi 2 years ago
7:58 - "What you're niaively assuming is: legalise it and all the gangster fade away." - There's nothing niaive about that, Anne! It's exactly what would happen.
Dealers charge heavily for putting their necks on the line. If everybody could legally grow cannabis in their attic, shed or greenhouse, there'd be no easy profit for dealers.
"Complete nonsense" would be to assume that gansters would remain in an industry that they're not profitting from!!
psychodelicfungi 2 years ago
7:08 - "Cannabis Psychosis". Another complete myth. Studies have shown there's a direct corrolation between cannabis users and people who at some point in there life suffered from mental health problems (depression, stress etc). People who bandy this statistic as proof of an adverse effect of the herb are forgetting that it's also a known fact that people with mental health problems are more likely to try cannabis. Hence the origin of the correlation! Mental illness is a CAUSE, NOT an effect!
psychodelicfungi 2 years ago
2:48 - Ann says "We also KNOW that a certain percentage of people go through the gateway from soft to hard drugs". It's so frustrating when a trend of thought becomes accepted as fact such as the "gateway theory"!
I know A LOT of people who regularly use cannabis and have never touched anything stronger (except alcohol, obviously; but that's not a "real drug" is it?). It's in the region of about 50 people. Only ONE has had an addiction problem and he never touched a joint before-hand!!
psychodelicfungi 2 years ago
Such ignorant and hypocritical individuals. As the International community has celebrated the war on drugs. The UN needs to consider enforcing the legal use of marijuana a international recognized narcotic; regarding the UN charters and the breach of peace it produces.
Paradisexcali 2 years ago
a drugs debate with Ann Widecombe? How can someone who doesn't understand being a druggie comment on it. It's like asking a mexican to comment on being english, it's ridiculous. Of course people will be tempted to experiment with drugs if they feel miserable and trapped in their life, which means we should'nt be letting these illegal aliens through our doors who are flooding our streets with drugs. The government are doing this to own children this moronic labour government
SimplyTheVest2 2 years ago
There is no "war on drugs". Alcohol, tobacco, caffeine etc are all legal.
There is, however, a war on personal freedom.
VanDoodah 2 years ago 2
That is an extremely perceptive comment my friend.
Thomas Jefferson wrote: "Were the government to prescribe to us our diet & MEDICINE, our bodies would be in the same bondage as our souls are now".
Abraham Lincoln: "A Prohibition law strikes a blow at the very principles upon which our government was founded".
Palfium66 2 years ago
" Abraham Lincoln: "A Prohibition law strikes a blow at the very principles upon which our government was founded".
Abraham Lincoln: I like nothing beter than to sit on my porch, play my German accordeon and smoke a pipe of my Indian hemp.
tigerone1970 2 years ago
@tigerone1970 That has no bearing on U.K law.
toweronepower 1 year ago
@toweronepower,
Who cares if it has bearing on British law? Mythmaking is the same no matter what or who does it. Do you know the UK has FIVE towns called Hempstead?
There is a hint for you.
tigerone1970 1 year ago
This video needs more attention.
Legalize.
If you're a prohibitionist, that means you support the crime and violence created by the black market.
Xerond 2 years ago 2
Those who support continuing "drug war" prohibition are one of three types:-
1. Cops & Prison Guards. The cop unions know an end to the WoD would cut the crime rate massively. Unemployed cops on welfare, or hire slick PR for a dirty fight lying to the people?
2. The drug cartels. Dont think the drug cartels can't fund prohibitionist politicians via 3rd parties.
3. Those who haven't researched the truth yet, or those suckered by the fear based propaganda & lies of one of the above two groups.
Palfium66 2 years ago
"the bar will be removed..." 2 seconds after they talked about the WHO study showing NO correlation between harshness of drug laws and rates of usage. People in support of prohibition are EXTREMELY selective in what they CHOOSE to hear. It's fucking frustrating when there's so much emotion involved in a theme. Debating drug legalisation is very much like discussing politics and religion.
Hicksville 2 years ago 5
the frustration is compounded by the fact that the people in charge are the ones who are for prohibition
weasel7777 2 years ago
The prevelence of drug harms is a product of the policy base that exists now. Widicombe suggests Rowles is 'mad' - whereas the madness is maintaining the policy that serves to produce the very harms it sets out to solve. Widicombe needs to learn some simple rules of debate, repeating as she did her assertions and opinions doesnt make them more 'factual'. Fmr UK Drugs Advisor, Julian Critchley's informed view on what is broken is where the drug policy debate needs to head.
mildgreens 2 years ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
I believe god gave me the right to grow marijuana, and the greedy DEA is trying to take that right away. Next thing you know they're gonna have a new law against unhealthy foods, and a bunch of Govt dickheads trying to convince me why not to legalize pork chops because it makes people obese. This war on drugs is only still going on because the DEA is trying to pretend like they still need to exist. Lets just get rid of the DEA and get Ron Paul for President in 2012!
EggFooDungBung 2 years ago
That guy just utterly destroyed her.
I wonder how long this retarded prohibition is going to last..
m00kid 2 years ago 19
People are driven to drugs because of politicians like this. Mo is a gateway to hard drugs!
SarahSoulFood 2 years ago
How is alcohol not a gateway "drug"? How many drunken fools have been a t a party and said , Hell yeah gimmie a bump of that cocaine it looks fun. IM drunk what the hell.
urTimesup 2 years ago
Steve - great! (from Richard Thompson)
uachtaran 2 years ago
kevin booths american drug war is a good documentary on this subject. the govt already supplys heroin to ppl hrew pills
FATBOITHEREAL 2 years ago 2
u can see that documentary free on here
FATBOITHEREAL 2 years ago
Repeal all Drug laws.
michaelmage 2 years ago 2
Look at this lady. Listen to her. Is this what you want for our future? This has been going on since Reagan. Why can't people rise up and put a stop to it? I like to respect people. I try to whenever possible. Sometimes, however, people have to be told their standing is not what they think it ought to be. Just because you're old and wealthy does not mean you're right.
cat00012000 2 years ago 6
Education is the answer. Legalize it and let people enjoy themselves!
Giles20 2 years ago 4
Legalize drugs! Drug addicts then won´t have to rob people on the streets of your city, rob your cars and prostitute themselfs so they can buy a meth or something!
ruzzaruzza 2 years ago 4
Liked how Steve Rolles stayed cool and responded with solid arguments to the polemic of Mrs. Widdecombe. No question, who won the debate.
leoteo87 2 years ago 14
This has been flagged as spam show
LoveAmericaStyle 2 years ago
If there was not a extraordinary hunger for drugs, there would be no problem. The US needs to focus on those who are hungry and NOT on those who supply.
oceanbound222 2 years ago
This just like Sky News. Very disappointing for Al Jazeera (which should be representing drug producing countries). Maybe it is just the usual absurd taboo about drug legislation that disallows reasoned debate? I don't know but one star from me I'm afraid.
fleontrotsky 2 years ago
This woman believes the Police Propaganda, and refuses to listen to the facts. She also believes, as Tim Leary pointed out long ago, that drugs are far more powerful than they actually are.
geezzerboy 2 years ago 6
Legalize it!
micahgee 2 years ago 7