Added: 2 years ago
From: galynwiemers
Views: 2,647
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (22)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • how careless the divine source must be if divinely inspired texts are not clear enough and necessitate interpretation, thus leading to the current situation where you have such a plethora of available interpretations.

  • ...kind of like the plethora of interpretations of the US Constitution...i suppose, if an intelligent being (for example Thomas Jefferson) were behind the writing of the Constitution then there wouldn't be so much confusion and so many political parties and government debates...i suppose, this carelessly worded document proves that Thomas Jefferson didn't exist and, if he did, he didn't put any thought into what he wrote...

  • @galynwiemers no, it proves he was a fallible human being, bound by the mores of the times he lived in, imperfect like the rest of us, sometimes making mistakes especially when seen through the accumulated wisdom of 200 years of human advancement. but fundamentally, it proves that he authored texts which were not divinely inspired. that is why i criticized the purported divine source of inspired texts, not their human authors.

  • two things...one, the fact that there are different interpretations of the Constitution does not mean the author made mistakes. The author was clear in his wording and clear in his intent. The fault is in the interpreters. Two, your first line of attack in your first comment is not the same as in your second comment. They could contradict if this conversation were allowed to develop.

  • @galynwiemers "carelessly worded" was your phrase, i continued that line of reasoning to include mistakes too. my second comment is necessarily different than my first if i have to respond to any new point you brought up in your response. the fault is in the interpreters? is the recognition of the institution of slavery in the constitution a mistake? is it a mistake when it occurs in the bible?

  • There is no immaculate conception, no one can walk on water, or turn water into wine or stones into bread, live, die on a cross and after three days come back to life meet with persons, and then be raised up into any cloud and vanish into thin air, so if this person died for the sins of humanity, which is rediculas, why did he leave anyway, and as it says he would return in like manner? Read the 1806 version

  • First, you are right when you say "there is no immaculate conception" because there is no recording or reference to this in the Bible...you are erroneously confusing the immaculate conception (conception of Mary by her mother Anne which I do not believe to be true nor necessary) with "the virgin birth" which is in the Scriptures...and, with that opening statement i realize you still have much to figure out...good luck...and, i'd like a link to that 1806 version you mentioned...

  • @galynwiemers I'll get back to you later, there is more to all this which simply cannot be known all within any same moment, however any end for the world can be predictable when we run out of natural resources, so what are all these wars truly all about anyway and any argument regarding what we are doing within having asbsolutley no sense in direction which many simply dont think about being conditioned within any any and all memorialized traditions

  • @galynwiemers I have the only copy still around, the Illuninati doesnt want you to know about this science called intelligence, I mean look around us

  • I am uploading the whole Bible School which has 111 classes at this time on Vimeo...you can find the beginning of the series here on Vimeo

  • A wicked man cannot undestand a good man. He cannot understand how he feels or thinks about things. He simply cannot relate. The more we trust Jesus by doing what he says the more we will understand how he thinks and feels about things. Character is the key to understanding; hermeneutics is important, but not as important as character. If Hitler followed the correct hermeneutical procedure would he rightly understand the Bible? No. "Justice" by George MacDonald. Godliness is the opener of eyes.

  • @BBBradH Jesus is still a crutch, because most persons are afraid of any retaliation, and society has been programmed to actual think that Jesus existed, which isnt what anyone could have imagined unless he was a great detective, and figured out wrote the good book, and who Jesus represented, a bum and any philosopher, sorry but I know who they were, and its better than anyone could imagine, because it is the truth because the good book within the writings of paul are the best exemplifications

  • Thank you for this! If everyone read Scripture with Biblical Hermeneutics, there would only be a few Christian denominations, if that. "Interpreting Scripture w/ Scripture, applying 'audience relevance,' understanding the culture and time when letters were written, understanding the symbolism of apocalyptic language," etc. You can't have proper exegesis w/o using Hermeneutics. I suggest getting the book on this by Milton S. Terry.

  • liked this any more videos teaching these things I'd like part one if this was an introduction

  • For anyone who desires a biblical understanding of the gospel and salvation, I would highly recommend checking out the scribd website that is listed on my channel.

  • good work.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more