Added: 4 years ago
From: nearadyn
Views: 239,051
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (322)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Boo this vid! BOOOOOOO!!!!!!

  • entirely useless other than as a take-down rifle. the rfb is sheer brilliance. this is kel-tec's practice to make their rfb

  • I have this weapon now so I'm going back on my previous comment. It was a live round he shot. Unfortunately this weapon u can't close the receiver if ur mag is empty. The bolt catch stays open unless u pull mag out. So my foolish mistake. Goodvideo

  • Someone shot a 22 on Back side of the camera n he reacted to it. It's piston driven not gas operated. Its not like u had your gas system opened that failed to extract the casing. The receiver never opened to extract the casing. Come on man. Everyone else is correct. This one is b.s.

  • @cnuffs more like he was using subsonic ammunition! Subsonic ammunition does not cycle the action on most guns and is used for silencers because it does not break the sound barrier making a sonic boom.

  • You can see the gases come out of the suppressor.

  • make it a sbr

  • @N609B Not worth the money, just add a Magpul AFG and save $170, of course in this video he already has, simply adding a vertical to a pistol is all they need sometimes.

  • Why are there so many haters!!?? This is very real!!! Cool set up!

  • rofl fake.

  • No one else seen him pull the charging handle to the rear and the round rejecting how can this be fake??

  • DAMN, Indiana Jones has really let himself go....

  • People assuming it's fake are dumb. The bolt didn't move back and the casing didn't eject probably because the homemade subsonic round didn't provide enough energy to cycle the bolt. There was recoil and a bullet did leave the muzzle, the suppressor aids in decreasing the perceived recoil. Being subsonic means there is no sonic boom since the bullet traveled slower that the speed of sound.

  • fake...this buster didnt fire the rifle, no recoil, didnt pull the trigger, you can tell because the bolt didnt move, no round ejected..........

  • Isnt a forward grip on a pistol illegal?

  • @rjonesy0075 I read that it is forbidden to add a vertical fore-grip under Federal Law. I think there's a way to get this legalized but I bet it has something to do with a class III license or something like that. I find this law ridiculous.

  • @rjonesy0075

    Yep unless his gun is registered as a AOW or SBR. Also assuming this was taken in the US.

  • @rjonesy0075 not with a tax stamp... educate yourself

  • Well...the suppressor works with subsonic rounds...that was quiet enough to meet any requirements for stealth that I can think of.

    Does it fail with full loads? (both noise level and suppressor life expectancy)

    I imagine quick suppressor burn out is a problem...probably expensive too.

    Suppressor life expectancy is normally short no matter what loads you are running so replacement cost would be a big factor.

    I give gun/suppressor/load combination a 6 out of 10 for effective useability.

    Not bad.

  • turds.

  • Some one is a penny pincher, one shot?

  • @02montecarloSS SOME ONE IS A DICK .... WITH 8 WORDS!

  • The suppressor is nice, but who is this cat Indy Jones wanna B just alittle scary!! and one shot come on

  • lame...

  • what kind of supressor is that ?

  • Subsonic rounds usually don't cycle unlike regular rounds, as he stated in his comment. You will save time if you all learned to read everything before putting up a stupid comment. Also this video is almost four years old, I'm pretty sure he knows about tax stamps, AOWs, SBRs, and everything else that would qualify it as a weapon that needs such items.

  • FAILED! weapon wasn't fired. Like others have stated. I hope you have a tax stamp for that foward grip

  • In my opinion if you have already gone through the hassle of getting Class3 sign offs for a silencer and AOW tax stamps, you might as well go SBR.

  • Hope you have a licenses for that grip on the front. It makes the gun classified as a AOW if you have it on. Have fun in butt pounding prison.

    No but i'm serious look it up.

  • I have hated those until now... the can really brings it together.

  • nice pony tail where'd get it?

  • A .223 or 5.56 whatever you want to call it wouldve been at least a 90 grain

  • so fuckin stupid, you look like a fuckin retard

  • Is that an SBR without a stock, or an AOW with a second tax stamp?

  • the gun wasn't even fired, the action didnt cycle, and the empty lock open would have kept the action open if you only "fired" one round.

  • dude you never fired it.... bb gun in the back ground!

  • I'm bi-curious about that gun. Sort of.

  • aww only one round

  • i want that gun its sweet lookin

  • I want an Indiana Jones hat...:(

  • hey, why didn't you put your non shooting hand on the forward grip?

  • is that.... TOM CRUISE!!!!!!!

    HAHA

  • That was about as real as professional wrestling.

  • Very impressive sound suppression on that model, nice! :)

    I'm curious, has anyone tried rebarreling and rechambering this weapon or the OA-93 in .300 Whisper (subsonic ammunition)?

  • Dwight

  • i was expecting the gun to fly into your nose

  • 69 grains subsonic. Might as well go with a .22 maggy.

  • nice setup. how much did it cost to register and buy the the supressor?

  • Did I just break wind or did he finally shoot???

  • You made INDIANA JONES your Bit@h

  • Doesn't the foregrip make it an AOW?

  • the problem I see here is that if that is true about being 100 yds away, the time it take for the round to hit the wood is an indicator of VERY LOW velocity. My subsonic 22 rounds are going faster then that. very little damage/penatraion and zero expansion. Other then looking for a cool factor wouldn't you be better served with an air rifle????

  • gay

  • Also not bad in a low profile SHTF scenario :)

  • @Composer1777

    contraire mon frere... From an executive protection perspective a 5.56 chambered ar mag fed weapon in an smg sized package offers several advantages when engaging in close proximity. First its concealable, you might be able to gaurd the principle with one of theses tucked, Its manuverable allowing for in car and cqb work. It will defeat most body armors at close range. It extends range. Lastly it allows cross platforming between it and an AR system for mutual support.

  • Ahem... NFA? 

  • Indiana Jones, shoot them Nazis!

  •  0:19 ONLY YOU CAN PREVENT FOREST FIRES

  • damn dude u shot i a shitty gun way to go

  • @xXTheJ0kerrXx it's only a shitty (pardon my language) gun if you didn't finish the break-in period

  • @xXTheJ0kerrXx

    Dude thats a Piston Driven , AR mag fed, 5.56 chambered "pistol. It has a lifetime warranty and its based of the su series which have been tested intensively by the tactical civilian market, which in many cases have LEO or Service experience. Its capable of +100 yards and is concealable. Snob Kel Tec if you want , but thats the kind of ignorance that delayed the cz 75 , glocks and numerous other systems from the American Market

  • may be 77 grain round would be better for subsonic ...

  • Strange but cool looking gun.

    I like it!

  • bad ass gun, but the video sucks, admit it!

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • gay

  • @arisdages Gay? My gun isn't gay! .....It might be bi curious though. I saw it checking out my HK USP .45 a few times. And I'm not gay either. But if I was, I wouldn't be offended in the least by being called, "gay". So, I wonder, is there even a point to your "gay" comment? Or was it just random brain droppings?

  • @nearadyn lolololol.....brain droppings, priceless

  • @nearadyn nice comeback 0.o

  • @nearadyn you shoudve bought a kel tec su16 instead. they look better, they just dont have that pistol grip.....

  • @nearadyn gay also means happy, so maybe thats what he ment

  • @nearadyn ha this reply is so much win

  • @nearadyn BURN!!!!!

  • Comment removed

  • @rimbaudlink As awesome of a youtube video would be of me cumming while some guy with a stopwatch and a whistle is standing by to record the results for you viewing pleasure......uh....no...

  • NEARADYN - Where did you get all the sweet mods? That thing is far from stock. Let me know. Thanks. Send me a message.

  • @Jaboie the TAC-16 suppressor I got at a local gun shop. Google "grip-pod" which is what I have on it now. Now I also have a scope on it. It's really a shotgun scope, which might sound strange but it works very well on this gun. Beta C-Mag is another addition which I have now. And a sling from Kel-tec. So the gun has evolved since this video was made. Also I put a SU-16 aperture sight on it as well. Ordered it from Kel-tec. I also took it apart and filed the trigger to give it a very light pull

  • @nearadyn doesn't adding the foregrip to it make it a SBR though? Not sure, but I know in my state if you add a stock or a foregrip to it, it becomes a SBR, and you have to pay the tax. If you don't, they can confiscate the firearm, so it may be something you wanna look up

  • @daBlade80 You are correct. This configuration requires a SBR tax stamp.

    

  • how do you make it cycle

  • @762full full cycle rounds will cycle it as normal. Subsonic rounds never will. You could in theory, replace the spring with a custom made light weight one, which would cycle subsonics. But then you would be condemned to only using subsonics. When firing subsonics, I just cycle it by hand.

  • @nearadyn I'm think of an AK, can you simply use two different recoil assemblies/springs for the two different loads?

  • Whats better a ak 47 pistol or the kel tec?

    I mean bang for the buck, I can buy the ak cheaper, but I like the Kel tec, but don't know if I can justify the price diffence to myself, unless the kel tec was vastly better.

  • I've never shot an AK pistol before. It sounds cool though. I do like the bigger caliber also. If Kel-Tec made a 7.62X39 version of the PLR, I would've bought one of those instead. But I think the PLR does have a smoother action and is probably more accurate. But again, I haven't tested this. Also, the AK pistol might be heavier. It all depends on what you want to be able to do with your gun of choice.

  • nice vid, but i dont get the aow law, i know you have to get some sort of paperwork for a forward grip, how do you go about getting the correct papers, btw i live in vegas

  • Is the gun registered as an AOW? If not then take that front grip off.

  • alexthebomb542, wow still people like you try to tell people what they can and can't do legally. People never seem to mind their own business in this century.

  • @nearadyn

    Just trying to help. For someone who owns a suppressor, you sure seem to be ignorant of NFA regulations.

  • alexthebomb542, I am not ignorant of NFA regulations. I have been plagued with them for some years now. It's just that I get such messages all the time and nobody ever assumes that my silencer is illegal. However, people constantly assume that my PLR isn't an AOW. Several times at gun ranges, cops ask to see my AOW paperwork. I have never once been asked for my silencer paperwork in several years now. At least they are protecting the world from evil criminals who have 2 grips on their pistols.

  • @nearadyn Just one guy watching out for another.

  • It's bullshit. It's a HOAX. The shooter is doing a pantomime!

    The bolt does not move, and there is ZERO discharge at the front!

  • You're right Lance6464, nobody could ever make a gun perform THIS good.... ya got me.

  • Comment removed

  • @StevenMartin1966: So... why don't you go buy one and make your own video. A video you can be proud of with no wasted time, only wasted ammo?

  • Sorry for the negativity near. You're not a tool. Guess I just had high expectations of seeing some action from your cool gun...and then..."kerthud".  Hope you remake the video with 5 or 6 rounds though.

  • @StevenMartin1966 It's cool. When I filmed this, I intended to fire 5 rounds. But forgot to get out the camera until I had one round left. At least I remembered to film at all. I was having too much fun. Usually when I go shooting, I go alone and seriously focus on accruacy rather than filming. I might get out the camera sometime when I have a friend with me. I have a HK USP Tactical .45 with silencer from "John's Guns" in Texas that I've been wanting to make a vid of. too.

  • dickhead

  • This is the most bad ass video on youtube

  • Does it have a problem with steel cased rounds?

  • I load all of my own ammo for all of my guns. Therefore, I never have tried steel casings. But in talking with a friend who owns a PLR, he says he has no problems using cheap steel cased ammo like Wolf and such. The actions in these guns are much less prone to problems than M16/M4 actions. But you have to keep your rate of fire low as heat buildup at high fire rates is a problem with these. If it gets too hot, the laquer finish on some ammo like wolf can melt and stick the case inside the gun.

  • "The actions in these guns are much less prone to problems than M16/M4 actions. But you have to keep your rate of fire low as heat buildup at high fire rates is a problem with these"

    rofl what a contradictory claim! i can run my M16's in full auto nice and hot without a single problem.

    keltec is junk

  • @zfilmmaker, It depends on your point of view. After owning my PLR for a couple of months I sold my preban Colt M16. I just didn't need it anymore. If you're interested in spraying lots of bullets downrange as fast possible, the M16 is for you. If you want a VERY lightweight and accurate gun that doesn't jam and doesn't have parts that you can hear rattle when you shake it, buy a KelTec. My Kel Tec has twice as tight of groups as my old M16. I guess It depends on what you want in a gun.

  • @nearadyn it depends on parts and which M16 you had. i run uppers on my M16's that utilize the best parts had and have zero rattles or problems. i'll bet you 10k any day my groups are tighter then your PLR in full or semi auto.

    it doesn't make sense (at all) to sell a 'real' colt preban M16 for this keltec. perhaps you mean 'post-ban' AR-15?

  • What an unusual hat.

  • callmebigpapa,

    Thank you very much! That's very complimentary. However it's only unusual in this century.

  • How do i go about getting one of those suppressors?? I live in Arizona where we laugh at gun laws

  • MizterOrtiz, you just find a class 3 dealer and fill out the paperwork, get fingerprinted, and take 2 passport sized photos. Get your local police chief or Sheriff to sign on the line saying you aren't a baby raper. Then mail it off to the ATF with a bribe...uh... I mean "fee" of $200. Wait a while....wait some more.... then when you get it back in the mail with a little stamp on it, you can go pick up your new can....finally.

  • Can I have that?

  • Comment removed

  • You are correct concerning the weapon being an AOW with the VFG. However, what law states one cannot use class III weapon for protection? There may arguably be prudential concerns, but no law that I'm aware of would preclude.

  • There is no law prohibiting the use of a silenced firearm in self defence or a machine gun. But if there ever is, I still won't care. The point of a suppressor is so that people won't notice that a gun was fired, or at least which direction it was fired from... it never ceases to amaze me how many people on youtube try to tell me what they think I can and can't do.

  • Comment removed

  • LOL!

  • hahaha, lmao. And all that waiting for one lousy shot!

  • eyeluvguns, sorry I can't hear you over the sound of how awesome I am.

  • wow, one shot? Youve got a magazine.

  • ummmm.... awkward

  • lol. i felt somewhat violated myself.

  • 1 shot...really? ammo is a bit pricey but at least run through a proper group.

  • I'm just curious as to why you went through the trouble to get the NFA paperwork done for the suppressor, but didn't get a stock and make it an SBR...

  • I'm considering it. Although now I have a shoulder sling for the gun and a grip-pod. Using those makes the shoulder stock not needed. A folding stock would still be really cool though....hmmm.....

  • So did you pay the $200 to make it an AOW with the front grip or did you have a class 3 who can manufacture do it so you could transfer it for $5?

    Do they even make a stock option for that if you wanted to SBR?

  • I went the $5 route of course. Yes there is a stock. All the stocks Kel-tec makes for their su-16 line of guns will fit the PLR and work with it. The action and design of the guns is unchanged between them. Of course you need the proper paperwork to be legal. You can buy the stocks separately from Kel-tec in the "parts" section of their website.

  • Oh that is pretty cool. Didn't know those used to same format to attach a stock.

  • Folding stock and SBR it gogogo, haha. That'll be one sweet weapon if ya do!

  • Accuracy.  Sorry.

  • They are almost the same cartrige. Diameter and average grain weight of the projectiles vary between the two. If your rifle is marked 5.56mm then you can shoot both 5.56 and .223 remington with no problems. If marked .223 then you are better of sticking to the calibrated ammo. AR 15 style pistols are gay by the way. Register it and make it a SBR. You will love the increase in assuracy and manueverability. I dont know if I spelled that right.

  • did that really shoot. i thought suppressors made alot more sound then that

  • great for carry in your car with a drum means you can really make sure you don't get rob

  • I carry a silenced HK USP tactical in .45acp in my jeep. The PLR is too heavy and harder to use through a car window. The silenced PLR is great for urban room sweeping though.

  • lol. wtf man, do you do enough shooting out of car windows and "room sweeping" for the size of the PLR-16 to be a big deal? It's refreshing to see a gun fanatic honest about his weird tendencies. Let me know when the revolution gets to your neck of the woods.

  • lmao

  • hahaha woot

  • i almost bought one but theyre to damn big so i got an XD instead

  • Ha crazy! Why the suppressor? Seems that would take away the usefulness of a pistol within a vehicle. How do you secure it when you leave the car? A lock box? I have been looking what options are available to install something under my seat. Do you have another opinion of what may be useful?

  • I leave the suppressor attached to the gun pretty much all the time including when it's in the car. I just keep it in a backpack in the car with the door locked. Why would I need a special lock box? If someone steals your car, they've got the gun and silencer whether it's in a box in the car or a backpack. I just don't worry about it. I never leave it in the car and the car out of sight of me if I'm carrying it with me.

  • Ahh, I didn't realize you always kept the car in sight. I thought you left it in there 24/7 as a car gun. You much more likely to have you car broken into than have it stolen, and it is common sense not to leave a firearm or class 3 item in the vehicle unsecured.

  • Does the vertical forward grip on that make it an SBR? Do you need a class 3 to own that?

  • No. Furthermore, this is a long range pistol. In other words, conceal and Carry Legal depending on the State you live in. Even if you put a drum on it.

  • This is true, it's technically a "pistol". So, you could use it as a conceal and carry weapon. But it's nearly impossible to conceal such a thing unless you're using a sling and a long coat. And when I put my drum on mine, it's VERY heavy. I don't think of this gun as a pistol really. it's a tiny rifle. If you want a more concealable pistol that is very powerful, try a .50AE Desert Eagle. There are custom holsters for it which make it possible to conceal fairly well under the right clothes.

  • Yeah I don't care for the .50 for two reasons. It can't use +p ammunition, and doesn't have the capacity I am looking for. I have the Jericho 941, and its more along my line of pistol. Slim, reliable, accurate, high cap.

    I personally would get a sling and just wear a heavy jacket.

    Aesthetics and practicality aside, if you want one BA rifle legal to use, carry, and hide on your person or vehicle, this is it

    I agree though, it is just a small rifle... I want one bad, but they are back ordered.

  • exactly, its good for your vehicle, especially if you live in urban areas. now the fn 57 is a good pistol that has fire power. it shoots the 5.7x28 cartridge and the mag holds 20rnds(you can add an adapter to the mag and 30rnds). to me carry a pistol with rifle ammo and 30rnds is sweet!

  • that weight will catch up to you.

  • No, forward grip = AOW

    Stock = SBR

    You do not need a class 3 license to own the above along with machine guns, suppressors, etc. You only need a c3 license to deal them

  • Pretty nice. It appears the subsonic round didn't have enough pressure to eject, which isn't necessarily a bad thing if you want the ultimate in silence.

  • wait that's a .16 and it's "ripping" through the target?

  • It's .223

  • I'm kind of a noob when it comes to diff. caliburs. I know about the common ones like 22, 380, 38spl, 357sig, 357mag etc.

    So is a .223 a badass round or what? The silencer must be workin real good if it is cuz although I'm muted I expect to see a bigger gas discharge from the barrel.

  • Well, the difference in diameter from a .22 is only .003. However, there is much more cartridge behind it than a .22 long.

  • what does a m16 shoot?

  • military versions shoot 5.56mm, which is very, very close to the .223in, but not the same. If you google it there is a ton of info.

  • The .223 caliber round is basically a 5.56 millimeter round, like our soldiers would use in an M4 or M16 weapon.

  • .223 Rem is actually .224" in diameter not .223. It is the SAME thing as 5.56mm. 5.56mm is not 5.56mm in diameter. 5.56mm = .218in. A bullet fired through a .223 weapon, which has a bore meant to shoot a .224 projectile, with a diameter of .218 would not make an airtight seal in the barrel, and thus... it would suck. The military should have called the round 5.66 since that's what .224in is in millimeters.

  • So in the military is the bullet's actual size .218 while being fired through a bigger bore?

    Or do they call it a 5.56mm when it's actually bigger than 5.56?

  • it's actually bigger than 5.56....

  • They call it 5.56 to appease NATO. Europe is all that metric crap. The Brits and other European countries use the same type of magazines and ammo types for logistics reasons.

  • Yes. If you shoot a 5.56 in a .223 it will only work once. THen you break out the tools. LOL

    However, if you shoot a .223 in a 5.56 you will be not so accurate, but fine. Most ammo sold is .223. However, if you want extreme accuracy, buy .223 for a .223, or 5.56 for the 5.56.

  • .223 and 5.56 are the same cartridge. Read earlier post by me. They only do this for maximum confusion. I used to own and M-16 which said 5.56 on the barrel and I put cartridges which said .223 on the rim through it with no problem. I've also put NATO 5.56 through my PLR. The gun hasn't blown up yet. It's all the same shell. look it up on wikipedia and do the math. I did and found it enlightening.

  • It is just a little bit less hassle if you go the "Trust" route. No finger-prints, no sherrif sign-off. It's less paperwork than buying a car too. The $200 sucks, though.

    Are you shooting sub-sonic?

  • I've not heard of that. What is the "trust" route and what are it's drawbacks? Yes, I load my own subsonics using Sierra 69 grain HPBT bullets, #1380 and 4.0 grains of IMR Trailboss powder. Don't use that load in longer barrels though such as an AR-15. They will get stuck in the barrel. I'd start with 5.0 grains and adjust the load until your speed is about 980fps

  • after just hearing the report and the hit it sounded like about 100 yards and i was suprised that the round traveled so slow. that wouldnt yawn or frag at all would it?

  • yes, if you modify the projectile a little bit. they will shed the copper jacket in pieces, and the lead core will continue on while tumbling. I've tested them out very well. I would not want to get shot with one! Unmodified, they stay intact and tumble a bit, but aren't nearly as impressive. but rigging them to frag takes about 20 minutes per round and is mind-numbingly boring. So, I don't do it very much now that I'm done testing them.

  • thats around what i figured the scenario might entail. why not try xm193 in 55 grain? that way the bullet may be light enough to travel at fragging speeds.its so hard to get the right ballistic outcome in these tiny ar-15 barrels but damn are they fun!

  • i have tried some government xm193. I shot about 50 shots of it. It works just fine. But I didn't think it was anything special. It seemed to behave like any other 55gr .223 round I've shot. They all perform well in this gun it seems.

  • i thot those wer illegal?

  • You can acquire suppressors but theyre a HUGE HASSLE to obtain. Look up suppressor and NFA laws.

  • these are not a "huge hassle" to obtain really. It's about 2 pages of paperwork to fill out and then a couple hours driving around town getting fingerprinted and getting your local sheriff to sign the paperwork saying you have no major felonies. The hard part to me, is mailing it all to the ATF and waiting a month or so before getting the papers back with the stamp so you can take your new toy home.

  • very nice setup you got there! I'm guessing the subsonic round doesn't have enough recoil to properly cycle the action? I was just wondering because I'm planning on getting a silencer for my AR and i heard there is problems with getting the subsonic rounds to cycle.

  • scootah2213, That's right. They won't cycle the action. There is one brand of commercially produced .223 subsonics that do cycle. The problem is, they will jam on every 3rd shot or so and are VERY expensive. it's much better to just load your own and just manually chamber the next round each time. The good thing about that is, without it cycling, it's quieter. There's no "KACHINK" sound of it cycling, which could give away your position when sniping waskally wabbits...heheheheh