driver of the s2000 is pretty good ! the m3 driver sucks, but overall if you wouldve took the driver of the s2000 and put him in the m3 , that wouldve been pretty kick ass lol
I don't think it is fair to assume the M3 driver sucks. This is likely a track day instead of an actual race. To me it looks like the M3 driver was just giving the s2000 an opportunity to go by.
ive been in a s2000 its a very well balanced car and got good control and fast too... my mate raced a bmw 330 and he was having difficulty keeping up... with the honda around the corner
I have an E46 330i and the only performance item I have is the Signature Motoring performance CAI for about $160. The performance kit adds around 13.5HP on the dyno, sounds freaking great, and installs in under 30 minutes. Highly recommended.
-13.5 HP increase
-Lifetime filter
-SOUND AWESOME
-30 min. install time
Aside from the power gain, the SOUND is amazing at higher RPM but sounds normal in regular driving. I’m thinking about added high-flow exhaust next.
damn that s2k is quick as shit. but, either that s2k is maxed out for the track or that m3 driver is babying his car because i've seen the e46 on the track, even Stock they are monsters on the track.
At 2:38 S2K driver was being really conservative. If he would have given it gas all the way through, he would have passed the M3 and held the turn with a quickness. I've spent many, many hours in the S2K on tracks and technical courses... the S2000 yawns at turns like that.
@aleksankazakov how much is the m3 ??? how much is the s2000 ??? theres your answer how much i save out of buying a s2k i can tune it and make it faster then a m3 and the interior of a s2k aint that bad so dont no what you talking about
@gu81singh It is not about the speed, it is about the look. I like M3 look and everyone else knows that you drive a bummer , an ultimate driving machine. And you are going to drive a Honda, good luck.
@gu81singh well thats stupid, if your watching a track video why the hell would you bring luxury and looks into the comparison? they are simply comparing the car and drivers performance. i think a Ferrari F430 looks way better than the M3 and everyone else knows that too. i guess its just a cheap bummer M3 then huh? if you want to go criticize a car for its looks go else where. don't start up a debate on which car looks better than which. watch the video and just enjoy it.
@BerlinaBlackS2000 Ferrary is an exotic car. M3 is not. You can get a used M3 in a good condition for under 25K. Go chek out. They are expensive only when they are new, but a 6 year old M3 will kick your ass. There are normal people drive M3's M5's as their daily drivers. I rather spend 20k on a Bimmer then on Honda. Honda is way overpriced for what it is. And after all it is still be just a car which is cheap all over, in the Inside and outside
Not bad at all, especially when you consider that the S2000 has 90hp less than the M3.
At some point I want to take the F20C out of my S2000 and drop it into an AE86 or S13, and put then put an E46's inline 6 into my S2000. That'd be a swap.
go play in sand man grow up then come here and talk. m3 is a track car, 50/50 wheight disrtibution. No its not too heavy, ur too heavy from having no life and sitting on youtube all day
its clear that m3 beats the s2000 on the staight, but a stock s2000, not this one, has very good corner speed, but if you spend a bit of money on it it feels near a racing car
You're right of course, but the car doesn't sound stock too, the driver is clearly seasoned ( equipped, does perfect heel and toe, etc..) and I don't know many guys in this situation that changes only the steering wheel we see, do you?
M3 is a great car but if you want that race car feeling S2000 is for you...
i would buy a M3 once i'm in my 30's but for now...that sheer enjoyment you get from S2000 with that money i paid...i can't get it from any other stock car....
doode... no... the m3 outhandles s2000 like lil girl, get over it. its just the driver is very good on s2000 and m3 driver is a rookie 16 year old kid. period. even though i like s2000
I think this s2k have the more usual mods, full exhaust line + nice intake + hondata? then maybe short shift.. But not supercharged as someone says...
if a supercharger installed, then rims, tires, suspension, and brakes must be modified. or otherwise it will have no difference of trying to kill youself.
tuned s2k smoke m3? normal...ok?
and I have to say there's lots of M3 can do 1000bhp+better handling due to reduced weight.
I never said a 35k s2000 would be stock, in fact, I even stated the numbers for them both stock RIGHT UNDER the prices.
You obviously do not know anything about sc'ed s2000s. Most go centrifrugal, meaning the stock powerband still applies. So no, a sc'ed s2000 without any suspension mods wouldn't be unreasonable.
50-35 is 15. 15k is more than enough to run a 7psi sc AND load of suspension mods. Wait, so who wins? Don't compare price.
I was not comparing price.I just wanted to let u know a 35k s2k cant be supercharged.if u didnt mean 35k s2k was supercharged.then simply just dont include it in ur no. list.
and, to be honest. this s2k is NA.s2k is a good car, it was designed for track.and it's cheap, that's the way of Japanese doing business.
comparing a two-seater with sedan = wasting time.
and u can see the M3 driver gave the inside for the s2k to overtake.
if the M3 wanted to race, the s2k will really have a hard time.
Wow you really need to improve your reading comprehension skills. You don't need to mention obvious things like a 35k s2k can't be sc'ed. No shit sherlock. On top of that, the price comparos in my post were NOT part of my 123 numbering. And since you deny comparing prices, then let's not. I'm just saying stock for stock m3 wins, but IF you were comparing at the same price level a 50k s2k is faster around this track than a 50k m3.
3. A supercharged s2000(like in this video I believe) will walk all over a m3 on any track.
Nowhere did I say a supercharged s2k IS 35k, or that a 35k s2k is superior to a m3, which is why I did the numbering, and not a big paragraph. I'm aware that a na s2000 can't beat a m3 stock, so I assumed like many others, that the one in the video was sc'ed. Read again.
What I wrote up top is just the basis for discussion. In other words, it's what we're talking about. I specifically wrote the word STOCK to tell you how much power and how much the car is STOCK. The lists at the bottom are just random facts I listed, and do not have any relevance to the two lines up top. Comprehend?
I can see that an utter idiot would confuse my meaning, but I don't think most would.
You know what I'm not even going to try anymore. I don't know which part of the world you're from, but you obviously comprehend English much differently than most. Maybe part of why I don't understand you is because you lack proper spelling, punctuation, and grammar. I'll leave the task of trying to figure out what the hell you're trying to say to some other willing individual, have a good day.
no matter how many manufacturing plants were built in the USA. Jpanese cars, which were built on land of America, still need to be called imported. it will never become a part of America domestic cars.
I can read your words, but it's becoming a chore trying to decipher the meaning. I feel bad for you that your English sucks, but honestly it's not my problem.
Of course you have to import a Japanese car, but the distributor of the cars in America does that, not you or I. Go tell every s2000 driver in the Us that they have to import their car, see how many can take you seriously.
Have a good day, but don't confuse yourself or others further if you ADMIT you can't speak proper English.
I have to communicate with u in English since u wouldnt even have a chance to communicatte with me in any other lanuages.
so, u mean Honda is American domestic car? what a shame.
the fact is that it will alway be called imported because it was not manufacture by Ford, Dodge, or any other companies that were registered as American auto-manufacture.
Great logic! great logic!
sooo, ur writing has no problem cuz I dont speak proper English?
so, u mean u would loss ur mind if u speak frensh?
You're right I can't speak French. I can only speak two languages, but both very fluently, unlike you. I'd rather be able to speak 2 fluently than speak 5, having others not be able to understand some of them.
Btw nowhere in my post did I say Honda is a domestic car. Either you can't read or you just want to make stuff up. I'd love to continue but I'm done trying to explain to you. Seriously, save yourself some trouble.
And as for the sedan vs convert issue, if people want to compare, they will compare. And since these two cars were pitted against each other on this track, people are going to compare.
Also, don't assume that the m3 driver COULD HAVE taken the s2k. You and I have no idea how things really are. The only thing given was that the m3 couldn't stay ahead of the pressuring s2k, and let him pass.
its not a sedan u idiot. you cant say the m3 handles badly! id have m3 over s2000 anyday. say whatever you want to say at the end of the day ur s2000 is just another HONDA...
M3's are one of the best handling cars compared to its competitors. But they also are known for shitty reliablity, horrible transmissions ( if you like shifting) shitty subframes, and burning oil like a bitch. which none honda is known for, and the fact that a 4 clyinder 2.0L with about 230bhp and like 160tq. can even keep up with a e46 let alone take it all day in the turns makes its awesome for like 9k less. people love baggin on honda cause the civics FWD n theyre cheap, but theyll win allday
who doesnt love rx-7's i cant argue there. rotary turbo's are just the way to go. but i dont think that s2000 was really modded you can tell its still N.A. and it didnt really catch up till the turns, which is expected the weight of that car and the way it was designed is to be a corner shark and just eat up everything. if it was modded it was lightly. people gotta remember the s2000 was designed to be a track car. the e36 was the same way, the e46 however is more of a show car with race heart
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
to tell you the truth the m3 is much much faster on high speed you cant even believe how fast it is, the s2000 has much less torque, its not much faster then k20 type-s rsx, wich my old 328 auto can beat it on freeway. it would never keep up that good stock, eather it was a fakes ass m3 (325) or a 16 year old girl driving it
@scherniybumer16 hey bro dont get me wrong i love beamers as much as i love the s2k the e30 is one of my favorite. and m3 would own a s2k in straight aways but the s2k will rape in the corners.but i believe the s2k has better handiling than the m3 . the s2k was desighned by the man that desighned the nsx. that tells you allot on how much the s2k was desighned for track
heyyy, actually it will be a drivers race, they both are similarly at handling, even the old m3 (e36) is as good as or slightly better then acura integra type-r
@cherniybumer16 u would say that right after what u watched, ur a complete retard mister, u called someone else a no life and sit on youtube all day, and yet look at u, u reply to almost every single person on this page
Finally, I would like the owner/video author to clear out what kinda mods this S2000 has? Just to shut up those loser who so scared of something better than their M3
the m3 seems like a stock one, there's no aerodynamic kits outside, so might not have performance kits, either.But the s2000 was modified. liten to the exhust sound, look at the aftermarket steering wheel, and look the short range shifter. the s2000's engine might be modified since the owner wouldn't modify all the part and left the engine stock.
therefore, compare a stock with a modified car is unfair. there's nothing worthy to compare them.
How do u know it's been modified? All S2000 is loud no matter modified or not as for the short shifter. Sorry to dissapoint, factory shifter is actually like that so drive one before u jump to conclusion k. Not to mention if a modified S2000 Engine Normal Aspirated is around 300~340hp so if the so call stock M3 is heavier and still pull aways on the straight that means the S2000 is fairly stock engine wise k. do your research before yapping about anything
at least the string wheel and shifter have been modified, I hope you see that. do you tune your car? you have to know that, when people changing a no-airbig racing steering wheel means what. The car is tuned mostly for track days. my bro have a s2000 and we often change eachother's cars. the factory shifter is not that short and the stock s2000 is loud, but not this loud. I said the s2000's engine 'might' be modified from the sound, but may be just exhuast cuz it lack of high speed acceleration
U still don't get it do you? Fine! I see no point of talking back and forth. Just stick with your Bimmer.. I'll stick with my Honda's k And How could u tell it's been modified? It's so low to the screen? And if people changes their steering wheel means they modified their car? WTF? Just listen to what you are saying? Anyways, good day
anyways, S2000 (So called modified) PASSED stock POS M3 at a track in Germany somewhere. End of story. Cut all the luxury/big engine ego/so call BMW handling. Handling wise S2000 can easily out pace most sports car out there, especially when it's a heavy weight M3. If you want comparision get a similar pricing Z4 2.5i then test it with S2000 which I am sure it will beat the crap out of it. END OF STORY
Ok, I am sure anyone that loves driving would do minor mods to the car, I mean, just wheels, sticker tires, brake pad. Don't nessary means it will improve the car 100 times, so given u saying that BMW is "SOOOO FXXKing great" then how could a "Cheap/4cyl/slightly modded Honda pass him? BMW driver can't drive, yeah thats it, most BMW owner can only talk the talk, and not walk the walk
For this track which is not very long,6 important turns, only good tires+suspension kits could give this S2k at least 3 seconds faster than a stock S2k.and I'm not talking about tuned engine and lightened weight cuz to be honest I didn't 'see' any weight reduction in this view. make sure you know how much 3 second is on a track.
ps. for a 4cyl car. Do you actually think it is cheap? 3.5k dollars for a I-4 engine, and interior from last century? think about it. it's a great car, but not cheap.
When buying a BMW u buy for the power, engine reliability, handling, feel, quality, and much much more but honda is more of a car thats for the engine other has rubbish stuff like plastic interior,paint thinner, engine not that reliable at all etc. also as u can see at 2:30 the bmw m3 lets him pass.
Yeah if E46 M3 Engine so reliable, then what the hell is wrong with all those Engine recall about oil leaks/ Engine damages it caused in earlier model (01-03 model year)? Honda's been one of the most reliable engine for decades again, ask anyone who owns one.
That was a fault due to over large values for the piston and etc. But i also don't see a honda working after 20 years??? do u ??? coz i see a bmw from year 1970.
first of all, Honda didn't come to the US til the late 70's and two, I have a '92 Civic with no problems at all and maintenance kept up regularly with 215,000 miles. 16 year old car with no problems and no engine recalls? And las think most people think of when they hear BMW is reliability. Performance, yes. Luxury, yes. Classy looks, yes. Reliability, at the bottom of the list... Toyota and Honda are at the top of the shelf for reliability...
apparently from personal experience i haven't had a problem from my BMW's which were the E30 318is and the E46 325i both i haven't had a problem with, also when i say reliability i don't just mean the engine, i also mean the interior reliability, paint. at the moment i have toyota rav4 gx M-style edition though that nothing wrong with engine the interior is "ok" but there is something not made well it makes u feel ur not insecure.Also the paint of Germany's have like 3 layers more than japaneses
Another thing that everybody forget is that a convertible M3 is 360lbs heavier (3781lbs). And I don't think it is going to come and outperform that easy an s2000 in a convertible battle. Or a z4 or z3 unless they are the M editions.
As of jan 2008 Toyota is the new leader in global sales. And I am a proud owner of the Tacoma (the new best selling light truck in america) but I see no toyotas in this race. Plus the celica is no match for the s2000 at all. sorry
sounds like a f1 engine i just love those small displacement engines pumping out more than 100hp per liter who cares if they have to rev to make power that high rpm thrill is one of a kind
BTW, M3 always r*pes the S2000 around Tsukuba circuit in the Best Motoring movies. It is not even close. That is even before getting into the E92 M3, which has been proven to be a far superior handling machine (22 seconds faster than E46 M3 around Nurburgring with a time of only 8:01 by Sportauto).
Wow.. that slow? 2002 Honda NSX-R did 7'56 dude! If u want to compare a car that cost half as much with outright speed in a road course. Sure enough S2000 would lose in a straight line. Since it's only 250hp. and with a 4cyl. Don't see any production BMW 2.0L 4cyl. making anywhere near that number??
Near stock M3 still raped an S2000 that was far from stock (seems like intake/header/exhaust and tune). Just goes to show how well the BMW M3 is tuned for Nurburgring.
yeah M3's good handling right? Look at the video. Cornering Honda's much faster.. it was catching up within a few corners? and even its got some bolt on mods.. it's still no where near the $60k+ price point. vs S2000 $35~38k?
Yeh, you are stupid, right? The m3 is like alot more expenisve, so the probably tthe owner don't want to waste his tyres on a ricer.. U can clrealy see that he's not as pro as the honda ricer
and, handling is not just cornering speed. when you got a good chassis and suspension setup, a honda civic may cornering fater than this m3. m3 is all about balance.
let me tell you what is the point of the price.
you can drive a m3 to both the track and a very formal conference and its no problem. but would you drive any honda to any formal meetings? I don't think you will.
How about the Senna/Prost Honda F1 era? 16wins out of 17 race in a single year? I don't believe that record has been beated by any European manufacture yet?
Need I mentioned that Toyota just became the second biggest Auto maker in the World? Of course BMW is better at racing, but who's bringing home with most MONEY! LOL Yeah, ignore the fact that the good old glory days of Group A racing. Schnitzer preped M3's Cosworth RS500 were beaten by the Nissan R32 GT-R? from 92-95 not single European car can touch that. Until they find a way band it. Not enough?
All in all, S2000 has better handling than the M3 since it's much lighter as well as more nimble thru the curves. As for Power, it's a no brainer. 3.2Inline6 vs 2.0LInline4. Come to think of it. I really misses the Nimble handling of the First Gen M3 E30's? I believe? And Now BMW has gone absoulutely the opposite of that? V8? Come on...
BMW could care less about honda or toyota or the like, they even ignore inifiniti and lexus's puny attempts at them, they care about the advancement of their only real foes, Audi and Benz. therefore with new faster V8 benz's and Audis, the M3 needed a more powerful motor, and a turbocharged 6 doesn't have the race capabilities a finely machined V8 does, any one affiliated with racing knows this, especially a BMW M engineer.
Yeah, they could care less about the Japs so much they have to join forces with Benz and GM to build a better Hybrid system to compete with the proven advance technology from Toyota.
Bmw is in a race with Merc and Audi. The rest of the world just makes ridiculous attempts at them. I love Honda's but I have owned 3 beemers so far and no honda
80-120(4th/5th gear) : M3 5,3s/6,5s ; S2K 6,8/8,2 s
Nurburgring times : M3 8min20 ; S2K 8min39
M3 is faster on the road, better trackcar, has better build quality, is more luxurious, more exclusive, better daily driver... unfortunately also more expensive.
What is a fully mod M3 and fullt mod S2k race... lets see witch is better.. lol so stop Defaming a car... Honda & BMW are both good but in diferent ways.. Mainly are on driving skills and most are bout the car's tuning.
kenne den Salzburgring sehr gut: tolle Fahrt im S2000, geiler sound; aber der M3 war kein wirklicher Gegner wahrscheinlich. Cool, wie du ihn dir in der Fahrerlagerkurve erst zurechtlegst, und dann vor der Schikane bügelst. Interessant, wenn im BMW ein Fahrer von deinem Kaliber gesessen hätte, das wäre lustig geworden...;o)
Humm, s2000 driver is much more better.. S2000 is a great car, but have no confort, luxury.. M3 is more faster.. M3 is a luxury sports sedan, confort, design , reliable, luxury and is very fast.
s2k sounds awesome!
beastson 1 month ago
Are you wearing a lambskin racing suit?
leandrolefa 6 months ago 7
What a car that Honda S2000 is
xmoroseguyx 6 months ago
Damn son throw some suspention on that bimmer if your gonna track it thing had mad body roll.
wazupmh 7 months ago
driver of the s2000 is pretty good ! the m3 driver sucks, but overall if you wouldve took the driver of the s2000 and put him in the m3 , that wouldve been pretty kick ass lol
salchipapa8000 7 months ago
Great driving. I was ready to trash talk the S2000 driver. That said, the M3 guy drives like a noob.
ubicomp 8 months ago
very nice driving man ! this car suits you just right ! awesome machine
TheHoff6300 8 months ago
Sweet sounding fun machine. Would have been nice to see the cars gages. Good video !
ylism 9 months ago
I love both of these cars, they both run well. Good video
QzFiNeST107 9 months ago
read the title people... honda S2000 WITH m3... not VS.. they are probably just having fun...
S1ruMan 10 months ago
I don't think it is fair to assume the M3 driver sucks. This is likely a track day instead of an actual race. To me it looks like the M3 driver was just giving the s2000 an opportunity to go by.
kellkan69 10 months ago
ive been in a s2000 its a very well balanced car and got good control and fast too... my mate raced a bmw 330 and he was having difficulty keeping up... with the honda around the corner
gu81singh 11 months ago
VERY NICE driving mate the good tool i good hands ;)
montana949skate 11 months ago
honda will always built the best engines
k20buki 11 months ago
Ay que mamaselo aese s2000
sarante28 11 months ago
turn up the volume nice and loud, and pretend, absolute bliss, my ears have just had the best sex ever
angrygunsmith 11 months ago
I have an E46 330i and the only performance item I have is the Signature Motoring performance CAI for about $160. The performance kit adds around 13.5HP on the dyno, sounds freaking great, and installs in under 30 minutes. Highly recommended.
-13.5 HP increase
-Lifetime filter
-SOUND AWESOME
-30 min. install time
Aside from the power gain, the SOUND is amazing at higher RPM but sounds normal in regular driving. I’m thinking about added high-flow exhaust next.
BMWPOWERization 1 year ago
S2000 and NSX Best Hondas ever
e36maf3 1 year ago
what engine is that ? k20 :S
gu81singh 1 year ago
@gu81singh F20c
29ryan49 1 year ago
2 litres 240 ps... no charger.... show me a BETTER ENGINE
bukinecky 1 year ago
damn that s2k is quick as shit. but, either that s2k is maxed out for the track or that m3 driver is babying his car because i've seen the e46 on the track, even Stock they are monsters on the track.
21ejc 1 year ago
Comment removed
BMWPOWERization 1 year ago
Nice video and driving.. ;)
Thanks for uploading ^^
DarkGSSJBeast 1 year ago
Most of you guys probably don't realize this might not be a stock S2000. I'd buy an S2000 but I don't know because I would use it year round.
29ryan49 1 year ago
outstanding driving by the S2K dude...M3 guy needs a bit more time on the track
gregoryurbina 1 year ago
At 2:38 S2K driver was being really conservative. If he would have given it gas all the way through, he would have passed the M3 and held the turn with a quickness. I've spent many, many hours in the S2K on tracks and technical courses... the S2000 yawns at turns like that.
hooraysweden 1 year ago
BMW was and will be better car. It is fast and it is luxurious. S2000 is fast, but nothing else is there.
aleksankazakov 1 year ago
@aleksankazakov how much is the m3 ??? how much is the s2000 ??? theres your answer how much i save out of buying a s2k i can tune it and make it faster then a m3 and the interior of a s2k aint that bad so dont no what you talking about
gu81singh 1 year ago
@gu81singh It is not about the speed, it is about the look. I like M3 look and everyone else knows that you drive a bummer , an ultimate driving machine. And you are going to drive a Honda, good luck.
aleksankazakov 1 year ago
@aleksankazakov Woah.. Why so many haters.. Man you are a big asshole..
Heehe if you haven't driven an S2000 before don't talk.. So please shut your mouth buddy and go drive a sports car... ;)
DarkGSSJBeast 1 year ago 2
@gu81singh well thats stupid, if your watching a track video why the hell would you bring luxury and looks into the comparison? they are simply comparing the car and drivers performance. i think a Ferrari F430 looks way better than the M3 and everyone else knows that too. i guess its just a cheap bummer M3 then huh? if you want to go criticize a car for its looks go else where. don't start up a debate on which car looks better than which. watch the video and just enjoy it.
BerlinaBlackS2000 1 year ago
@BerlinaBlackS2000 Ferrary is an exotic car. M3 is not. You can get a used M3 in a good condition for under 25K. Go chek out. They are expensive only when they are new, but a 6 year old M3 will kick your ass. There are normal people drive M3's M5's as their daily drivers. I rather spend 20k on a Bimmer then on Honda. Honda is way overpriced for what it is. And after all it is still be just a car which is cheap all over, in the Inside and outside
aleksankazakov 1 year ago
@aleksankazakov WTF IS A FERRARY???
dicktp 1 year ago
wow s2k kept up with a m3 thats good man :O
gu81singh 1 year ago
Not bad at all, especially when you consider that the S2000 has 90hp less than the M3.
At some point I want to take the F20C out of my S2000 and drop it into an AE86 or S13, and put then put an E46's inline 6 into my S2000. That'd be a swap.
hooraysweden 1 year ago
@ms20osc
wtf are you talking about???
go play in sand man grow up then come here and talk. m3 is a track car, 50/50 wheight disrtibution. No its not too heavy, ur too heavy from having no life and sitting on youtube all day
cherniybumer16 2 years ago 2
have you ever driven an M3 or you are just talking... sloppy handling the curves you say? :)
The driver of S2000 seems to be very good while the M3 driver is taking the corners not very well...
Clemenzaa 2 years ago 3
its clear that m3 beats the s2000 on the staight, but a stock s2000, not this one, has very good corner speed, but if you spend a bit of money on it it feels near a racing car
belmon125 2 years ago
Having an M3 is not enough if u dont know how to drive it, and this "guy" doesn't! The time the S2000 take's to get to him explains it very easly...
M3passion 2 years ago
Is it stock?
TheVtieg6 2 years ago
The S2000 looks better all right, but you can see this is a prepped track day car. The M3 looks stock...
MarMPB 2 years ago
A steering wheel doesnt make your car track prepped.
spintmes 2 years ago
You're right of course, but the car doesn't sound stock too, the driver is clearly seasoned ( equipped, does perfect heel and toe, etc..) and I don't know many guys in this situation that changes only the steering wheel we see, do you?
MarMPB 2 years ago 2
but he has a fur coat on..
spintmes 2 years ago
M3 driver sucks
M5PowerM3Power 2 years ago 23
@M5PowerM3Power S2000 is a much more raced focused car than the m3
dicktp 1 year ago
@M5PowerM3Power
Maybe its his 1st day on a track? Ya dont know.
eddohan 3 months ago
same general conclusion as everyone else- as much as i'd rather drive the m3, the s2000 just had a much better driver
paintandswim08 2 years ago
the s2 had a much better line and entrance speed at 1:40, the m3 has a pretty bad driver imho. either way, that was sick.
alubeam 2 years ago
No offense, I mean you have a wicked sick S2000 but yeah I'd still take the M3 over the S2000 any day=\... personal opinion though.
MikeHuntIsItchy 2 years ago 3
totally agree with you mike,,,BMW is what cars are even if the s2000 is one out of this world type of a car
dxbrd 2 years ago
haha. for sure. im positive people would take beamer over a honda anyday.
Minorthreat12xu 2 years ago
who needs brakes anyway?
kyofoyo 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
dude, if your car could cry, it would because of your bad braking
KilluaXIII 2 years ago
totally awesome cars.
nikolastwelve 2 years ago
nice video
nonoktmmotar 2 years ago
Can I ask what suspension mods have you done to the s2000?
AP1 or AP2?
cheers,
Allen
xinallen 2 years ago
once again....
VTEC rulez!
tsontaboy 2 years ago
S2000 is such a great car...
i just sold my e36 M3 and got a 05 S2000...
M3 is a great car but if you want that race car feeling S2000 is for you...
i would buy a M3 once i'm in my 30's but for now...that sheer enjoyment you get from S2000 with that money i paid...i can't get it from any other stock car....
goldfall 3 years ago
good car for a good price.
logonyomyface 2 years ago
modified or not i bellieve honda is better track car than the m3 e46 (if it is stock of course like this video).
anyway 1 think is 4 sure the feelin u get by drivin an m3 there is no way a honda can give ya .........
thomik13579 3 years ago 3
doode... no... the m3 outhandles s2000 like lil girl, get over it. its just the driver is very good on s2000 and m3 driver is a rookie 16 year old kid. period. even though i like s2000
cherniybumer16 2 years ago
n00b!
persempre91 3 years ago
You are a good driver. The sound of S2000 is amazing! VTEC mode [on] off. Long live for K20s
seclistas 3 years ago 2
K20 r nice but i thought s2000 had a F20c/F22c
heyhey20202020 3 years ago 3
Really, you are right! S2000 has a F20C engine. Long LIFE for F20s :D
seclistas 3 years ago
It's obvious that this S2000 is modified. A stock S2000 and a stock M3 E46 would be no contest whatsoever. The M3 would eat it for breakfast.
Ryan81M 3 years ago
actually the m3 would be slightly faster its not a huge difference but the s2000 can corner faster
heyhey20202020 3 years ago 3
nope
cherniybumer16 2 years ago
Good driver (honda) but im sure that you can ask a little bit more to your m3. I think he couldnt handle it in the circuit.
lalogoonie 3 years ago 2
the dude in the bimmer obviously let him pass him watch again
wickedc1ownz 3 years ago
best sounding 4 cylinder engine ever
h4xXx0r 3 years ago 41
best for me is e30 m3 with carbon intake and exhaust
MrFaMart 1 year ago
@h4xXx0r i think you never heard the 320si wtcc model
attila318i 1 year ago
hm. arge high-speed strecke
stoneeh 3 years ago
Great sound !
ivaniclixx 3 years ago 4
Where is the M3 driver ?
FatTube68 3 years ago
far behind :D
Brunodu68 3 years ago 2
who the hell argues on youtube? my goodness
Bayritto 3 years ago 4
wow...honda really makes quality cars!!!
and i think you can get both for the same price???
wadecarriez 3 years ago
BMW - heavy shit!
Mikica87Honda 3 years ago
I think this s2k have the more usual mods, full exhaust line + nice intake + hondata? then maybe short shift.. But not supercharged as someone says...
roflcoptered 3 years ago 2
35k car vs 50k car
240hp vs 330hp stock
Here's the facts:
1. S2000s handle better, and you bimmer fanboys are idiots to try to argue that.
2. M3s are faster around the track because they have more power, meaning the straightaway is their best friend.
3. A supercharged s2000(like in this video I believe) will walk all over a m3 on any track.
At the end of the day it's just about what you want. One's a lightweight convertible and the other is a heavy sport sedan/coupe. Choose.
hellspare 3 years ago
a 35k s2k wouldnt be supercharged
a supercharged s2k wouldnt be 35k
if a supercharger installed, then rims, tires, suspension, and brakes must be modified. or otherwise it will have no difference of trying to kill youself.
tuned s2k smoke m3? normal...ok?
and I have to say there's lots of M3 can do 1000bhp+better handling due to reduced weight.
then, choose again.
yuyueyuyue 3 years ago
It seems you my friend have problems reading.
I never said a 35k s2000 would be stock, in fact, I even stated the numbers for them both stock RIGHT UNDER the prices.
You obviously do not know anything about sc'ed s2000s. Most go centrifrugal, meaning the stock powerband still applies. So no, a sc'ed s2000 without any suspension mods wouldn't be unreasonable.
50-35 is 15. 15k is more than enough to run a 7psi sc AND load of suspension mods. Wait, so who wins? Don't compare price.
hellspare 3 years ago
I was not comparing price.I just wanted to let u know a 35k s2k cant be supercharged.if u didnt mean 35k s2k was supercharged.then simply just dont include it in ur no. list.
and, to be honest. this s2k is NA.s2k is a good car, it was designed for track.and it's cheap, that's the way of Japanese doing business.
comparing a two-seater with sedan = wasting time.
and u can see the M3 driver gave the inside for the s2k to overtake.
if the M3 wanted to race, the s2k will really have a hard time.
yuyueyuyue 3 years ago
Wow you really need to improve your reading comprehension skills. You don't need to mention obvious things like a 35k s2k can't be sc'ed. No shit sherlock. On top of that, the price comparos in my post were NOT part of my 123 numbering. And since you deny comparing prices, then let's not. I'm just saying stock for stock m3 wins, but IF you were comparing at the same price level a 50k s2k is faster around this track than a 50k m3.
hellspare 3 years ago
improve my reading? or ur writing?
"On top of that, the price comparos in my post were NOT part of my 123 numbering."
but actly, since u wrote in that way, Im afraid that u were, no matter how u argue with that.
Im not here to teach u writing logic.
my first reply on u comment was to let u know, u are confused about what u tried to say.
plus, from that post. a sc'ed s2k could not be only 240bhp.lol
now I knw ur thougts, but when i see that first post, i was confused by ur sentences.
yuyueyuyue 3 years ago
LOL what the hell are you trying to say?
I wrote:
3. A supercharged s2000(like in this video I believe) will walk all over a m3 on any track.
Nowhere did I say a supercharged s2k IS 35k, or that a 35k s2k is superior to a m3, which is why I did the numbering, and not a big paragraph. I'm aware that a na s2000 can't beat a m3 stock, so I assumed like many others, that the one in the video was sc'ed. Read again.
hellspare 3 years ago
do u really know how to use no. list?
"Here's the facts:"
facts for what?
for
"35k car vs 50k car
240hp vs 330hp stock"
this is what u showed in that post
yuyueyuyue 3 years ago
This is becoming hilarious.
It feels like I'm talking to a 14 year old.
What I wrote up top is just the basis for discussion. In other words, it's what we're talking about. I specifically wrote the word STOCK to tell you how much power and how much the car is STOCK. The lists at the bottom are just random facts I listed, and do not have any relevance to the two lines up top. Comprehend?
I can see that an utter idiot would confuse my meaning, but I don't think most would.
hellspare 3 years ago
"It feels like I'm talking to a 14 year old."
that was what I thought
"The lists at the bottom are just random facts I listed, and do not have any relevance to the two lines up top. "
this is what u thought,but the structure of ur writing meaning differently.
ur writing is different with what u thought. see the problem?
this is just a trackday, not a race.when Im doing a trackday, during the cool down lap, I alway give the way to everybody.
s2k do handles better.but how about after 240khp?
yuyueyuyue 3 years ago
You know what I'm not even going to try anymore. I don't know which part of the world you're from, but you obviously comprehend English much differently than most. Maybe part of why I don't understand you is because you lack proper spelling, punctuation, and grammar. I'll leave the task of trying to figure out what the hell you're trying to say to some other willing individual, have a good day.
hellspare 3 years ago
that doesnt matter since all human languages are based on the same logic.
and I believe I know more about s2k than u know. u have to import s2k from overseas, lol.
the more u explain, the more u conceal.
u thought u never make mistake cuz that is u native language?
well, I thinnk ur first post gave the answer.
yuyueyuyue 3 years ago
I would test your knowledge but all you'd have to do is whore google.
u have to import s2k from overseas, lol.
I think this says it all.
Maybe if you live in Korea or something..
go feed someone else bullshit
hellspare 3 years ago
haha
finally u began swearing
no matter how many manufacturing plants were built in the USA. it's still a Japanese car, and u have to import.
when did u bought ur s2k? I sold my s2k AP1 in dec.2004 when I was in Japan. duno if u bought earier than that.
sorry about my bad English cuz I can only speak 5 languages, and since life is limited, I have no time to improve my English skills.
however, I guess u can read my words, dont u?
yuyueyuyue 3 years ago
pardon me
I should say
no matter how many manufacturing plants were built in the USA. Jpanese cars, which were built on land of America, still need to be called imported. it will never become a part of America domestic cars.
yuyueyuyue 3 years ago
I can read your words, but it's becoming a chore trying to decipher the meaning. I feel bad for you that your English sucks, but honestly it's not my problem.
Of course you have to import a Japanese car, but the distributor of the cars in America does that, not you or I. Go tell every s2000 driver in the Us that they have to import their car, see how many can take you seriously.
Have a good day, but don't confuse yourself or others further if you ADMIT you can't speak proper English.
hellspare 3 years ago
I have to communicate with u in English since u wouldnt even have a chance to communicatte with me in any other lanuages.
so, u mean Honda is American domestic car? what a shame.
the fact is that it will alway be called imported because it was not manufacture by Ford, Dodge, or any other companies that were registered as American auto-manufacture.
Great logic! great logic!
sooo, ur writing has no problem cuz I dont speak proper English?
so, u mean u would loss ur mind if u speak frensh?
yuyueyuyue 3 years ago 4
Why do you keep dragging this on?
You're amazing. Amazingly stubborn.
You're right I can't speak French. I can only speak two languages, but both very fluently, unlike you. I'd rather be able to speak 2 fluently than speak 5, having others not be able to understand some of them.
Btw nowhere in my post did I say Honda is a domestic car. Either you can't read or you just want to make stuff up. I'd love to continue but I'm done trying to explain to you. Seriously, save yourself some trouble.
hellspare 3 years ago
yah
u r amazing, too.
I didn't expect u can reply that much.
I really had a hard time of trying to squeeze my sentences, while also containing the same no. of ideas.
maybe that's why my english is hard to understand on these utube replies.
u really dont know why I always find some irrelavant things to argue with u after I found that u r a real "genuis"?
well, if u still dont know after these many posts. then, u r not so clever, and Im afraid that I'm not going to tell u. hehe
u r amazing!
yuyueyuyue 3 years ago
And as for the sedan vs convert issue, if people want to compare, they will compare. And since these two cars were pitted against each other on this track, people are going to compare.
Also, don't assume that the m3 driver COULD HAVE taken the s2k. You and I have no idea how things really are. The only thing given was that the m3 couldn't stay ahead of the pressuring s2k, and let him pass.
hellspare 3 years ago
its not a sedan u idiot. you cant say the m3 handles badly! id have m3 over s2000 anyday. say whatever you want to say at the end of the day ur s2000 is just another HONDA...
lama101 3 years ago
M3's are one of the best handling cars compared to its competitors. But they also are known for shitty reliablity, horrible transmissions ( if you like shifting) shitty subframes, and burning oil like a bitch. which none honda is known for, and the fact that a 4 clyinder 2.0L with about 230bhp and like 160tq. can even keep up with a e46 let alone take it all day in the turns makes its awesome for like 9k less. people love baggin on honda cause the civics FWD n theyre cheap, but theyll win allday
car2nr4d 3 years ago
coz the honda is modded the only japanese car I like is the mazda rx7 and thats it
lama101 3 years ago
who doesnt love rx-7's i cant argue there. rotary turbo's are just the way to go. but i dont think that s2000 was really modded you can tell its still N.A. and it didnt really catch up till the turns, which is expected the weight of that car and the way it was designed is to be a corner shark and just eat up everything. if it was modded it was lightly. people gotta remember the s2000 was designed to be a track car. the e36 was the same way, the e46 however is more of a show car with race heart
car2nr4d 3 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
to tell you the truth the m3 is much much faster on high speed you cant even believe how fast it is, the s2000 has much less torque, its not much faster then k20 type-s rsx, wich my old 328 auto can beat it on freeway. it would never keep up that good stock, eather it was a fakes ass m3 (325) or a 16 year old girl driving it
cherniybumer16 2 years ago
the s2000 is a track car not a freeway/drag car take your 328 to the track and see what will win
element15723965981 2 years ago
@element15723965981
hey man bmw are track cars too, my bmw is not an m3 but still good at handling, m3 would own s2000
cherniybumer16 2 years ago
@scherniybumer16 hey bro dont get me wrong i love beamers as much as i love the s2k the e30 is one of my favorite. and m3 would own a s2k in straight aways but the s2k will rape in the corners.but i believe the s2k has better handiling than the m3 . the s2k was desighned by the man that desighned the nsx. that tells you allot on how much the s2k was desighned for track
element15723965981 2 years ago
heyyy, actually it will be a drivers race, they both are similarly at handling, even the old m3 (e36) is as good as or slightly better then acura integra type-r
cherniybumer16 2 years ago
i guess your right but i think the e36 will destroy a integra typ r on the track .
the s2k is in a class of its own compared to other hondas and acuras thats my opinion .
element15723965981 2 years ago 2
i donkt know man, when my business will go up, ill buy one s2k for fun, drive it for a lil then sell it.
cherniybumer16 2 years ago
@cherniybumer16 u would say that right after what u watched, ur a complete retard mister, u called someone else a no life and sit on youtube all day, and yet look at u, u reply to almost every single person on this page
davidzzz94 1 year ago
i had bmws since 16 and never had anyyyyy problem which u never had bmw telling me that.
cherniybumer16 2 years ago
well since you dont understand ill send you a message to enlighten you
car2nr4d 2 years ago
Finally, I would like the owner/video author to clear out what kinda mods this S2000 has? Just to shut up those loser who so scared of something better than their M3
koukiR32 3 years ago
the m3 seems like a stock one, there's no aerodynamic kits outside, so might not have performance kits, either.But the s2000 was modified. liten to the exhust sound, look at the aftermarket steering wheel, and look the short range shifter. the s2000's engine might be modified since the owner wouldn't modify all the part and left the engine stock.
therefore, compare a stock with a modified car is unfair. there's nothing worthy to compare them.
yuyueyuyue 3 years ago
How do u know it's been modified? All S2000 is loud no matter modified or not as for the short shifter. Sorry to dissapoint, factory shifter is actually like that so drive one before u jump to conclusion k. Not to mention if a modified S2000 Engine Normal Aspirated is around 300~340hp so if the so call stock M3 is heavier and still pull aways on the straight that means the S2000 is fairly stock engine wise k. do your research before yapping about anything
koukiR32 3 years ago
at least the string wheel and shifter have been modified, I hope you see that. do you tune your car? you have to know that, when people changing a no-airbig racing steering wheel means what. The car is tuned mostly for track days. my bro have a s2000 and we often change eachother's cars. the factory shifter is not that short and the stock s2000 is loud, but not this loud. I said the s2000's engine 'might' be modified from the sound, but may be just exhuast cuz it lack of high speed acceleration
yuyueyuyue 3 years ago
U still don't get it do you? Fine! I see no point of talking back and forth. Just stick with your Bimmer.. I'll stick with my Honda's k And How could u tell it's been modified? It's so low to the screen? And if people changes their steering wheel means they modified their car? WTF? Just listen to what you are saying? Anyways, good day
koukiR32 3 years ago
you wouldn't change your steering wheel before you changed your wheels, tires, brakes, etc.
have some common sense....
yuyueyuyue 3 years ago
anyways, S2000 (So called modified) PASSED stock POS M3 at a track in Germany somewhere. End of story. Cut all the luxury/big engine ego/so call BMW handling. Handling wise S2000 can easily out pace most sports car out there, especially when it's a heavy weight M3. If you want comparision get a similar pricing Z4 2.5i then test it with S2000 which I am sure it will beat the crap out of it. END OF STORY
koukiR32 3 years ago
Ok, I am sure anyone that loves driving would do minor mods to the car, I mean, just wheels, sticker tires, brake pad. Don't nessary means it will improve the car 100 times, so given u saying that BMW is "SOOOO FXXKing great" then how could a "Cheap/4cyl/slightly modded Honda pass him? BMW driver can't drive, yeah thats it, most BMW owner can only talk the talk, and not walk the walk
koukiR32 3 years ago
For this track which is not very long,6 important turns, only good tires+suspension kits could give this S2k at least 3 seconds faster than a stock S2k.and I'm not talking about tuned engine and lightened weight cuz to be honest I didn't 'see' any weight reduction in this view. make sure you know how much 3 second is on a track.
ps. for a 4cyl car. Do you actually think it is cheap? 3.5k dollars for a I-4 engine, and interior from last century? think about it. it's a great car, but not cheap.
yuyueyuyue 3 years ago
When buying a BMW u buy for the power, engine reliability, handling, feel, quality, and much much more but honda is more of a car thats for the engine other has rubbish stuff like plastic interior,paint thinner, engine not that reliable at all etc. also as u can see at 2:30 the bmw m3 lets him pass.
83willz83 3 years ago
Yeah if E46 M3 Engine so reliable, then what the hell is wrong with all those Engine recall about oil leaks/ Engine damages it caused in earlier model (01-03 model year)? Honda's been one of the most reliable engine for decades again, ask anyone who owns one.
koukiR32 3 years ago
That was a fault due to over large values for the piston and etc. But i also don't see a honda working after 20 years??? do u ??? coz i see a bmw from year 1970.
83willz83 3 years ago
Yeah! Just youtube S600 Honda. It's actually from 1964 not to mention other N500 or Z600
koukiR32 3 years ago
so u saying that the honda now is a old version??? if so prove it
83willz83 3 years ago
first of all, Honda didn't come to the US til the late 70's and two, I have a '92 Civic with no problems at all and maintenance kept up regularly with 215,000 miles. 16 year old car with no problems and no engine recalls? And las think most people think of when they hear BMW is reliability. Performance, yes. Luxury, yes. Classy looks, yes. Reliability, at the bottom of the list... Toyota and Honda are at the top of the shelf for reliability...
ojdidit84 3 years ago
apparently from personal experience i haven't had a problem from my BMW's which were the E30 318is and the E46 325i both i haven't had a problem with, also when i say reliability i don't just mean the engine, i also mean the interior reliability, paint. at the moment i have toyota rav4 gx M-style edition though that nothing wrong with engine the interior is "ok" but there is something not made well it makes u feel ur not insecure.Also the paint of Germany's have like 3 layers more than japaneses
83willz83 3 years ago
Another thing that everybody forget is that a convertible M3 is 360lbs heavier (3781lbs). And I don't think it is going to come and outperform that easy an s2000 in a convertible battle. Or a z4 or z3 unless they are the M editions.
Renatubie 4 years ago
As of jan 2008 Toyota is the new leader in global sales. And I am a proud owner of the Tacoma (the new best selling light truck in america) but I see no toyotas in this race. Plus the celica is no match for the s2000 at all. sorry
Renatubie 4 years ago
Exact sentiments dflet03 ! Hahaha ...
Love those engines, especially when they`re NA
AsNiDmY86 4 years ago
sounds like a f1 engine i just love those small displacement engines pumping out more than 100hp per liter who cares if they have to rev to make power that high rpm thrill is one of a kind
dflet03 4 years ago
BTW, M3 always r*pes the S2000 around Tsukuba circuit in the Best Motoring movies. It is not even close. That is even before getting into the E92 M3, which has been proven to be a far superior handling machine (22 seconds faster than E46 M3 around Nurburgring with a time of only 8:01 by Sportauto).
SpeedKlz 4 years ago 3
Wow.. that slow? 2002 Honda NSX-R did 7'56 dude! If u want to compare a car that cost half as much with outright speed in a road course. Sure enough S2000 would lose in a straight line. Since it's only 250hp. and with a 4cyl. Don't see any production BMW 2.0L 4cyl. making anywhere near that number??
koukiR32 4 years ago
Near stock M3 still raped an S2000 that was far from stock (seems like intake/header/exhaust and tune). Just goes to show how well the BMW M3 is tuned for Nurburgring.
SpeedKlz 4 years ago
yeah M3's good handling right? Look at the video. Cornering Honda's much faster.. it was catching up within a few corners? and even its got some bolt on mods.. it's still no where near the $60k+ price point. vs S2000 $35~38k?
koukiR32 4 years ago
Yeh, you are stupid, right? The m3 is like alot more expenisve, so the probably tthe owner don't want to waste his tyres on a ricer.. U can clrealy see that he's not as pro as the honda ricer
BMW > ricers
Mattvvvv 3 years ago
This s2000 is not just $35-38k. it worth more!!.
and, handling is not just cornering speed. when you got a good chassis and suspension setup, a honda civic may cornering fater than this m3. m3 is all about balance.
let me tell you what is the point of the price.
you can drive a m3 to both the track and a very formal conference and its no problem. but would you drive any honda to any formal meetings? I don't think you will.
yuyueyuyue 3 years ago
i would be happy with either car
KARTRACR61 4 years ago
How about the Senna/Prost Honda F1 era? 16wins out of 17 race in a single year? I don't believe that record has been beated by any European manufacture yet?
koukiR32 4 years ago
simple
ferrari, italy
the schumi and rubens era
2003-2004
yuyueyuyue 3 years ago
Need I mentioned that Toyota just became the second biggest Auto maker in the World? Of course BMW is better at racing, but who's bringing home with most MONEY! LOL Yeah, ignore the fact that the good old glory days of Group A racing. Schnitzer preped M3's Cosworth RS500 were beaten by the Nissan R32 GT-R? from 92-95 not single European car can touch that. Until they find a way band it. Not enough?
koukiR32 4 years ago
toyota is actually #1 company
belgradeboy89 4 years ago
Yeah, just read an article it's actually No.1 now. woo hoo...
koukiR32 4 years ago
All in all, S2000 has better handling than the M3 since it's much lighter as well as more nimble thru the curves. As for Power, it's a no brainer. 3.2Inline6 vs 2.0LInline4. Come to think of it. I really misses the Nimble handling of the First Gen M3 E30's? I believe? And Now BMW has gone absoulutely the opposite of that? V8? Come on...
koukiR32 4 years ago
BMW could care less about honda or toyota or the like, they even ignore inifiniti and lexus's puny attempts at them, they care about the advancement of their only real foes, Audi and Benz. therefore with new faster V8 benz's and Audis, the M3 needed a more powerful motor, and a turbocharged 6 doesn't have the race capabilities a finely machined V8 does, any one affiliated with racing knows this, especially a BMW M engineer.
StangGT5 4 years ago
Yeah, they could care less about the Japs so much they have to join forces with Benz and GM to build a better Hybrid system to compete with the proven advance technology from Toyota.
koukiR32 4 years ago
Bmw is in a race with Merc and Audi. The rest of the world just makes ridiculous attempts at them. I love Honda's but I have owned 3 beemers so far and no honda
djdragosh 4 years ago
ridiculous attempts? 2 WORDS
TOYOTA SUPRA
belgradeboy89 4 years ago
I know BMW>honda (when i say honda... I mean any honda :) )
zapaados 4 years ago
good driver
leo530520 4 years ago
S2000 is no competition at all for any M3.
0-200 : M3 18,6s ; S2K 28,4s
80-120(4th/5th gear) : M3 5,3s/6,5s ; S2K 6,8/8,2 s
Nurburgring times : M3 8min20 ; S2K 8min39
M3 is faster on the road, better trackcar, has better build quality, is more luxurious, more exclusive, better daily driver... unfortunately also more expensive.
Basically the two can't be compared. Case closed.
Stiletto153 4 years ago 2
I just bought an s2000, my friend just bought an M3...this video was heavy ammo in my debate!!! Love it!
gstar980 4 years ago
damn..VTEC
d00d00dumb87 4 years ago
This video is great. I can't stop watching it.
makadri7861 4 years ago
What is a fully mod M3 and fullt mod S2k race... lets see witch is better.. lol so stop Defaming a car... Honda & BMW are both good but in diferent ways.. Mainly are on driving skills and most are bout the car's tuning.
gary7890 4 years ago
kenne den Salzburgring sehr gut: tolle Fahrt im S2000, geiler sound; aber der M3 war kein wirklicher Gegner wahrscheinlich. Cool, wie du ihn dir in der Fahrerlagerkurve erst zurechtlegst, und dann vor der Schikane bügelst. Interessant, wenn im BMW ein Fahrer von deinem Kaliber gesessen hätte, das wäre lustig geworden...;o)
girlsmag 4 years ago
ooo men thıs Honda S2000, of course it win
buraknsx 4 years ago
Very good driving! Kudos to the driver and for making a great video. S2000 is sweeeet!
pvang82 4 years ago
very good river, good throttle bips too
scorpio1066 4 years ago
its great!!
kkkkcircuit 4 years ago
Humm, s2000 driver is much more better.. S2000 is a great car, but have no confort, luxury.. M3 is more faster.. M3 is a luxury sports sedan, confort, design , reliable, luxury and is very fast.
cccp2007 4 years ago 2
Sorry, but this illusion of BMW's being very reliable has to be nailed. They're not all that reliable. Every reliability survey says the same.
textthing 4 years ago
BMWs are for the high rollers. Rich people buy BMWs for the name not speed. Anyone can buy a fast car, buy not anyone can afford a BMW.
someguy2255 4 years ago