Added: 5 years ago
From: doroty11
Views: 74,617
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (120)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • The sad thing about this is that the Apache uses Radar/GPS guided missiles now. There are also a number of tactics that an Apache pilot might use in order to confuse and negate the Shtora system even with laser guided munitions.

    As for the fools commenting on the Apache's armor, please take a look at the Apache's tactics and purpose before making stupid comments. Then, take a look at the tactics and purpose of the aircraft they're being compared to.

  • @Providence932 bro, the tanks emp will even take down radar guided missles, it doesnt matter this system can take any missle that has electronics in it.

  • POR FAVOR , TRADUCIR AL ESPAÑOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • done

    

  • Abrams is one of the top tanks in world today and it belongs to top 5 for sure. Therefor its even more pitty to see people "brag" about two Iraq wars won in situation where there is top modern tank vs 40 years old technology.

    Iraq is living in stone age.

  • хуйня автор

  • will be nicer ..all Voennoe delo videos with english subtitles!!

  • done

  • lmao cannot jam a javalin and cannot jam a t.o.w seeing as the tow is wire guided and cannot be jammed and a javalin uses recignition software to attack and stay on target i have even heard russians say the t90 can jam the abrams sighting system witch is not true seeing as the aights on the abrams are hard wired and you cannot jam somthing that is hard wired

  • @1bigtarget

    correction: it can jam a javelin, so read up on your material.

    idk about a tow though, never really researched those, look boring to me so....yea.

  • @1bigtarget

    lol, you didnt like physics in school, did you?

    Shtora jamming capabilities are not based on radio band jamming principle, therefor it doesnt matter whether missile is wire or radio controlled. Shtora uses IR band jamming.

    It cant jam Tow-2 because this missile uses xenon (optical) backup beacon. Also Shtora shouldnt be a threat for Javelin missile since its output power probably isnt big enough to blinden the missile.

  • @Ackreti Even if missile cannot be misled, it can still use Arena charge to destroy it or to confuse it.

  • @Hashishtani

    That's true. Though I were talking about Shtora only.

  • @1bigtarget

    It should be able to jam Abrams rangefinder and effectively disable its FCS. Again it doesnt matter abrams is "hard wired" since this is not radio jamming. Abrams sends 30 IR pulses/second to figure out the distance to target, if Shtora is emitting IR wideband pulses it should be impossible for any rangefinder to figure out proper distance values and therefor disable automatic fire control computer systems - landbased or airborne. Of course the crew still can target old fashion way.

  • I enjoyed the Red Alert music in the background ^_^

  • The jammers are good against SACLOS missile, but will be useless against the Beamrider like Kornet.

  • Waw! i did knew about laser detection system,ultra red emiters, and anti rocket-anti shell guns with onboard radar guidense, but didnt knew that thay have radio emitters wich zero out all the signals that come into enimy's rocket guidense system.

  • '

    where ussr russia get computer come from,,,

    what kind of computer

  • Что вы тут кипишуете. предназначение Это комплекса можете сказать умники!?

  • Comment removed

  • Ну не знаю про ракетные войска. Наверное такая пропаганда имеет место.

    Но заметь что в конкретном случае говорится об оборонительных системах, а не о нападении.

  • worster isnt even a word buddy.

  • ZIVELA RUSIJA ...POZDRAV IZ SRBIJE

  • @sasapopovic2001 mater ti cigansku

  • a tipical russian solution, simple but affective. unlike the Israeli trophy this doesn't need as much computer power behind it because it doesn't need be precise to hit its target. which makes it cheaper, more cost affective and also seems to have more then one round on each side unlike trophy does now.

    I see some problems tho.

    like the collateral damage, which would seem to be greater then trophy, and it works to close to completely stop the energy of the warhead from damaging the armor.

  • Yes, debries from both the Arena shrapnell charge and the destroyed missile are very dangerous for trailing infantry if the attack comes from 6 o'clock. The thing is infantry will not protect the tanks anymore.

  • Russians built the BMPT vehicle (fighting vehicle for tank support) which will protect the tank from enemy infantry. Basicly a heavily armoured T72 chassis with a new turret. Armament consists of 2x30mm cannon in the turret, 4 anti-tank or anti-air missile containers on the turret, a 7.62 machine gun coaxial, and 2x30mm automatic grenade launcher, one on the right and left of the vehicle body with a 120 degree frontal arc.

  • How does this system work? Looks like a phosphorus dispenser of some kind. Is is automatic or manually initiated. I like cola, but it don't beat a Stoli w/ OJ!

  • Ok this thing is about SHTORA and ARENA. SHTORA is supposed to notice the laser beam the leads anti-tank projectiles on ton the tank. When it notices that laser is "painting" the tank - it shoots off a smoke screen and starts a radio "attack" on the projectile so it goes off its course. ARENA, in case the projectile gets through SHTORA;s defences notices the round and shoots off a cloud of shrapnel towards it destorying it before it hits the armor.

  • AND ALL USA CITIZENS!!!! ITS FOR U!!

    Guys! I like ur counry! i hate ur nazist gov... thats all.. And if u think that in iraq or any other country where USA got war< there were a OLD "T" tanks.. Analogs without any Computers and defence systems. In Russia they are refresh evry Year.. U should understand that.. And only after said " Russian millitary is crap, cuz we distroyed their T55 or T-72 in Iraq".. OLD and WITHOUT any competer and DEFENCE SYSTEMS... and theyr pilots just *****.. thats all

  • USA dont get Nigger for people till to 1980.. Shut up and drink cola...

  • Maybe go and kill urself?

    U should... So stupids ppl like u just will destroy the Eart.

  • In 1870 an amendment to the Constitution which Niggers received equal rights with whites. But for another hundred years after that in the U.S. were: buses for whites only, restaurants for whites only, and so on.

  • so who are you criticising? the racists?

  • Yes, racism is bad. I wrote because it was written earlier that Russia - the largest gathering of the Nazis in the world. But this is not true, Russia has never had the oppression of indigenous peoples, and even more so for their destruction. During the XIX century the indigenous population of Siberia and the Far East increased by two. Compare with the South or North America, where European colonizers had killed millions of Indians.

    I apologize for the remarks not on video.

  • Its about anti-missle system "shtora".. Its really good...

  • yeah subtitles are needed. more people need to know whats going on. t-72/80/90 rocks

  • vot tolko interesto skolko takih ustanovak stait na nachih tankah.

  • na pochti vseh eksportnih stoit Arena i Shtora.... shtora stoit v principe na vseh i stoyashih na vooryzhenii, T80 poslednih vipuskov i T90 vse imeyut Shtoru... Arena - slishkom dorogo, na T90s skoree vsego stoit to ih malo...

  • может быть и дорого, но новый танк стоит дороже =) После известных событий на кавказе, в нестоль отдалённом прошлом, наши войска перевооружаются по последнему слову техники... Если я не ошибаюсь, до 2020 года, в планах ВМФ создать 5 авианесущих ударных групп... Это уже что-то.

  • You could project movies onto that general's hat.

  • ROOOOOOFL man thats so true... russian officer's hats are ridicolous... LOOOL

  • Yeah, with a good stiff breeze, they might take off!

  • Iraq (in 1991) had not t-72 tanks

    Their poor copies of T-72 was very far from real T-72 tank

  • @Primorsky it dont matter russia has nothing that can stand up tow to to with the abrams nothing you have can penitrat the frotal amore of the abrams not to mention the u.s training for tank crews is ten times beter than russian training every single person in a tank crew knows how to feild strip every weapons system on the abrams and know almost everything there is know about the mechanics of the tank so repairs go faster becuase russian soliders are not trained with thie knolidge

  • @1bigtarget

    Have you heard of the AK-47, man? Russian engineering is designed to be low-maintenance and easy to use. Therefore, less training required. Also, I suggest you invest in a dictionary. yUo undrstendt me,?

    *sarcasm*

  • @1bigtarget ABREMMM rULEEZ !!!11

  • @Primorsky We killed both T-72 and T-80s in the Gulf and Russian crap is no match against a Cobra or Apache.

  • @WNxJihad

    lol you're an idiot. Attack helicopters for anti-tank and set up. A Cobra and Apache really shit, but not helicopters, they are both made​of cardboard, a rifle can shoot down these "masterpieces". Try to shoot down the Mi-28N or Ka-50 .... In general, go to school ...

  • @7777chugun You know the AH-64 is capable of withstanding up to 23mm all day long right?

  • @WNxJihad I don´t know if that was sarcasm or not, but Apache can´t even withstand .50 cal.

  • @qelleri Not sure who told you this so called fact. You ever been in an AH-64? Trust me a 12.7mm is NOT gonna take one down.

  • @WNxJihad it will if you shoot in the back of the aircraft where the fuel is kept the only armor it has there is the thin peice of metal and a thin layer of kevlar made so that the helicopter could withstand small arms fire

  • @qelleri

    Most helicopters in the world cannot withstand sustained .50 caliber fire. Even the KA-50 cannot withstand this punishment.

  • @Providence932 That´s true. .50cal AP rounds will destroy any helicopter. Russian copters are slightly more reslient to damage though.

  • @WNxJihad

    AH-64 ability to withstand enemy 23 mm fire depends on cartridge type. HE or AP will have different effects at different distance (at AP rounds).

    Generally, no armor can withstand any fire "all day long". Armor will get penetrated with certain number of rounds fired simply because its hardness will be degraded. AH-64 and similar are usually protected to 23mm at cabin and blades. 50 cal will easily take any helicopter if enough bullets hit the weak spots.

  • @WNxJihad Only the cockpit is supposed to withstand up to 23mm. And in reallty it doesn't as been proven countless times already.

  • @7777chugun They never taught me that in school....

  • @7777chugun

    You think that 7.62 will bring down an AH-64? Go to Afghanistan and try shooting one with your AK and see how far you get before you get turned into goo.

    The KA-50 is a good aircraft, but a terrible gunship. the MI-28N is the only Russian attack helicopter that's worth it's salt.

  • Can you please put on English subtitles?

  • iraq did not have T-80,,they had T-72 the garbage 1 we no that the russian we never sell there good staff

  • T72 is a good tank in right hands :)

  • true sir, but u have to know something russian and american will never sell there good staff to other countrys no matter what..let me give an exmple.when the american sold to pakstan F-16's in 80's they give them the shity one believe me they have 2 for there secret of the fighter so now the russian do the same they sold to iraqis T-72 but not the same one in russian use in there milltry. i love T-72

  • and 1 more thing T55s is from the 1948s T62 is from 1954... this is the tanks iraq used...

  • lol the m1a2 abrehams is geting raped by Russian RPG-7s from the 60ss!!! and in desert storm a m1a2 was knocked down a by a T62...

  • nice copy? who did russia copy this from? the aliens of the other world? no country had this in their aresenal before russia. this entire APS idea, is russian from the start. ALL credit goes to russia for this system, unbelievably impressive tactical advantage they now have! canada should equip their leopard 2 with this system to reclaim the #1 position from the south koreans.

  • The first idea of the counterexplosion is from Soviet academician B. Voitsekhovsky in 1949. However it wasn't used since the prototype are not yet perfected and suffers from flaws. In 1967, a West German researcher Manfred Held conducted similar research base on the same idea, and it is now commonly known as Reactive Armor.

  • Thanks to the research of the two individuals, tanks have better protection. However, it does not exclude the passive armor and it is still a must, incase APS should fail. The Russian's APS is the ealiest, and has paved the way of many APS system developed throughout the world.

  • In 1974 Soviet conducted a more thourough research with the reactive armor. The Ministry of the Defensive Industry proposed a contest to find the best tank active and passive protection. This is what resulted in the explosive bricks installed on Russian tanks today. In 1982, for the first time reactive armour, created on the basis of the German experience, was installed on Israeli tanks during the Arab-Israeli Conflict, and was shown to work.

  • Trophy and Quick Kill are some of the notable modern APS systems.

  • She ne wmerla Ukriana

  • that shows how easy can man stop 20000 $ & > more rocket, simple and cost "nothing"

  • it cost , or do you thing that shtora systems grow in the trees ?

  • yea yea :D Actually the enemy can shoot at the T-90 as long as he wants.. He gon never hit the tank :D

    Vot eto pizdec polnij amrikancam.. oni slishkom tupie shtob do takogo dodumatsja :D

  • yes yes T-90 are the best! Abrams can eat shit !

  • you forget to add OLD russians maded iraki tanks .

    no need to thanks me

  • can u tell me wich "iraqui freedom war?"

    u just see shit of ur stupid goverment

    of ur stupid imperialist country, cmon...even santana was fucking ur army time ago, why dont u compare ur selfs with russia or china?

    fucking wannabe

  • HA HA HA

    boy you are gettin to much propaganda in your country - and - don´t know about it.

    Americans copied much from the germans - and at most - they "learned" from goebbels!!

  • Yeah, the "goebbels" and that made the US the richest nation on Earth! Where does you nation stands today?

  • dunno ?`

    probably less debts than the US?

    Ask the chinese and arab´s - they own your dollars.....

    ----

    It´s pseudo "free" - occupied by NATO!

  • I don't think the richest nation is own by others. That goes the other way.

  • Well you should know then that China is having 37% of all dollars produced by USA goverment in thei economy circulating and they can every second excange it to other currency and then USA will go bankrupt, thats why USA is trying to import less from the east. Europe wil have the same problem if we wont stop it.

  • China's economy is rapidly growing due to good economic relationship with the US. After all the US is Chinas most valuable costumer.

  • Richest due to printing without end and credit, rich ha!

  • That's one dumb comment.

  • no, its not dumb - can´t explain it in english, but -there is somethin like "M3" which is like all the money that exist... the us dont Communicate this anymore... because they are printing like they need it...

    ... go, €uro, go ;-)

    -----

    yeah, rich of marketing big mouths and rich of "stolen" technology, and great history in killing an invading foreign countrys.....

    makin a mess of south america and the middle east

    - yeah, you can so be proud abut the USA, man!

  • Many countless people from around the world come to the US because the nation is bad? Really? Even illegal immigrants are willing to cross the border to get into the United States for better jobs and future.

    But hey, being on top is not easy and many will hate. If you think the US do not care about the world, just know this that the country has the most humanitarian aids and volunteers to other nation in help.

  • i don´t say everything from there is bad!

    like - as an example - i love what the people there have made for electronic music :-)

    -

    but i believe they dont care for the rest of the world- exept it brings more money or power

    -

  • most people who leave where they were born are: -in a poor enviroment (which often comes because of industry nations(1st world) who suck their country´s out) -got war in their place (probably initiated by the "global players"[industry, company´s or nation´s ) -dream of a "better live" watchin to much tv and believe every one(dumb or smart) can become "something" ... hey - i heard once the USA haven´t paid for a long time their bills at UN ?! - they aren´t rich anymore
  • you know, peopl in denmark live much beter. Minimum salary about 20$ hour. Mexicans want to live in usa coz your govremn stiling mexican resorces. U doing this with many countrys arond the world.

  • this is most idiotic comment i have ever seen!!!

  • krasivo comrades,krasivo,russian for ever

  • The only threat to Russian tanks will be enemy tanks and mines. All the other crap will be ECM-ed offroute, wasted by Arena projectiles, or unable to see the tank because of the special cloud that can be dispensed, impenetrable by radio, light & infrared waves.

    In short: forget about "surprises from the air"!

  • were those tanks equiped with opctical jammers ?

    i doubt it .

  • We are the champions comrade !

  • its not complete? please post more.

  • nice one

  • Excelent - only APS in the world

  • what about trophy???

  • nice copy, but still sucks

  • American "Trophy" is a copy of Soviet "Drozd" system designed in 1983!

  • u dont know a thing about trophy u even dont know that trophy isnt american

  • jeka41190

    I know that trophy is Israeli, Americans are too stupid to make their own, US is buying trophy from Israel. But the fact is - Trophy is till experimental and is very very very similar to Drozd system. Russians have 3 systems and 2 of them are in mass production (Drozd is old - Arena is better). the Strora optical jammer is something NATO can only dream about for the next 20 years

  • Correction:

    The Shtora optical jammer ...

  • about americans i agree but about that is experemental you wrong because in last monthes markava IV batallion got trophy aps. ofcourse it be similar because in both ways the same way is used to shot down rockets what is different is the radar and thats is the most inportent in aps

  • this comment made my day =D

  • nice

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more