Interesting...however, just because one does not have sufficient evidence to reject the null hypothesis does not mean that the two would be statistically similar, just that the null hypothesis would be accepted. As the p-value was .66, there is still a small chance that the experiment gave an incorrect result, as it looked like you had a small sample, you probably did not use an SRS to find the people to test, and the population isn't necessarily normally distributed. Anyways, you guys done :)
Interesting...however, just because one does not have sufficient evidence to reject the null hypothesis does not mean that the two would be statistically similar, just that the null hypothesis would be accepted. As the p-value was .66, there is still a small chance that the experiment gave an incorrect result, as it looked like you had a small sample, you probably did not use an SRS to find the people to test, and the population isn't necessarily normally distributed. Anyways, you guys done :)
viziertim 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
god, just say they werent statisticall differnt
esmith97403 1 year ago
that was so freakin funny.. original
erich832003 1 year ago
Hahaha This is Awesome! & Hillariously akward...! lol
IfonlyIwereAwesome 1 year ago
Wait...you said p-value...lol. Oops. Same difference...ha ha ha.
balteb 2 years ago
That's cool...I haven't though of z-scores and stats in a long damn time!
balteb 2 years ago
Thanks big sister! It was fantasssstic!
Elrond24 2 years ago
haha
the boy at 1:30 is sooo awkward
well so are most of the guys...
haha
randommanrunning 2 years ago
haha, that was pretty awesome. xD I liked it. Their reactions are priceless.
alwayskatharine 2 years ago