Actually your hand would get older if you click subscribe because it has to do more work than staying still. If your right handed then your left arm is probably two times younger than your right arm and will have less wrinkles and smaller wines but you should subscribe anyway because it makes you look smart :D I think wines is typed wrong
Actually, with the position of my computer, I am going against Earth's natural movement, therefore I am going slower than the normal 428mph that we have.
my theori is that time will elapse for ever it will never have a stop, so there must been someone travling back in time like in the movies and we'd see it, by now or it will never happen since time is for ever and they in futher it must always be some fool who decide to go to this time, if time is going on for ever, its almost 100% sure someone would,
You kinda got it wrong, The only way time would go past in the hundreds on earth while you're out in space, is if you're travelling near light speed, this is due to the fact that light is maximum speed, you cannot go faster. And while travelling at light speed and moving around in the spaceship should technically make you go faster than light speed, nature doesn't allow it by slowing time down to make this rule of physics still apply. Time travel is possible in other ways, but I'm out of space.
Well time travel is technically possible, if you are in the US at 2:00 pm on Saturday, and you go to Japan or something it will be like 1 am. on Sunday. When you travel back to the US, you are time traveling back to 2pm. on the same Saturday
Also with the daylight saving time thing, when the clock says 1:59am, the second it says 2:00 we will automatically go back one hour to 1am, this is kind of like time traveling. What do you guys think? :)
Did he say can or cant travel backwards? i though that the only ways to go backwards were very strange ways that have only been theoryised, must of them involve going past the speed of light using a black holes grazity or the more releastic one for us, using millions of intersecing lazers to bend space space and thus creat a type of wormhole, mite be wrong though but there about the only two theorys ive heard, then again you could just buy a delorean:P
firstly, for a living being, it is possible to travel forward (faster than the normal rate, I mean) but not backwards.
secondly, it is only possible for massless particles to timetravel backwards if the wormhole has been open since or before the time it wishes to go to, and that the particle can be isolated i.e. no quantum fields, which is otherwise not possible.
now i get it. i forgot to rule in the different reference frame to account. :(
but,the argument stands still with both CERN researchers neglecting their original data after taking account how relativity affected their data and the researchers at Netherlands, backing up the original data after taking in relativity to account. i guess we just have to wait for a few more years for any of the theories to be confirmed. :)
i really like if C can be broken, so that C travel can actually b mde pssble
relativity is a theory my friend. the fact that it is a theory means that its never proven correct because there is no way to prove it absolute. and besides, the internet is a whole different topic. einstein was limited to what he can do with the tech that exist in his time. we now have the tech to prove it, and the scientists at CERN used it and proved him wrong about light being the fastest thing in the universe, by accident.
@XRockVstarI499 a scientific theory is as close to a certainty as it gets pretty much, gravity is called a theory, the term isn't used in science the way people generally use it.
We're also in practice applying the concept of relativity by having GPS satellites send their signals to us out of synch, taking into account relativity; so that they would arrive in synch. If we wouldn't do this, no GPS in the world would be accurate; so I suppose there's your proof. :)
@kikkavella Wikipedia on theories: "A scientific theory is a set of principles that explain and predict phenomena. Scientists create scientific theories with the scientific method, when they are originally proposed as hypotheses and tested for accuracy through observations and experiments. Once a hypothesis is verified, it becomes a theory." Also, physical laws predict behavior without describing 'why' it happens. Theories explain the 'why'.
@XRockVstarI499 In science the word Theory doesnt mean that at all. A hypothosis becomes a theory after it HAS been proven to be true in multiple tests.
@XRockVstarI499 Having said that, it has caused the entire scientific community to question both the experiment and Einstein's theory, which will lead to a much higher quality and quantity of experiments scrutinizing both. This in turn will lead to a much more accurate and definitive theory regarding relativity to account for the results, whether that be a modification or a reinforcement of the existing theory. Challenging beliefs will always result in a more accurate definition of our world :).
@XRockVstarI499 Pretty much everyone in the scientific world, including the scientists at CERN who did the experiment, are very skeptical of their findings about neutrinos being faster then light, and are not willing to accept them as accurate yet. One experiment is not enough to disprove thousands of experiments done over a span of about 60 years.
The speed of light was not broken, they made errors in measurement or calculation somewhere along the line. Secondly, relativity has been proven - experiments have shown that time is distorted in orbit (space-time curvature) and that space-time is indeed warped around the earth.
@XRockVstarI499 The neutrino experiment did not, in fact, disprove anything we know about physics, and there are several theories that allow for the possibility of PERCEIVED faster-than-light travel, without breaking any laws of physics. (Such as the Alcubierre drive.)
@XRockVstarI499 A theory, properly used does not mean a guess or a supposition. It is not something waiting to be proven, to grow up into a fact. A theory is somethign far greater than a fact could ever be. A theory is a well supported explanatory structure capable of explaining and predicting a range of phenomena.
A fact is just an isolated tidbit of knowledge But a theory organizes facts, concepts and predictions into a functional, scientific framework.
@XRockVstarI499 really well i just read that cern think the reading may have been caused by a loose fibre optic cable linkin them to a gsp system. they have yet to confirm that to be true but will be releasing a stament about it soon.
einstein's whole concept on special relativity was based on the fact that light is the fastest thing in the universe. turns out, scientists at CERN found out that neutrinos can travel faster than light. so, his whole concept is basically in jeopardy of being wrong because his fundamental idea was wrong.
I guess everyone's hear the latest breakthrough as of a few days ago saying time travel may be possible at least at a subatomic level.
I wonder if something I've stumbled across could open new doors in scientific research. If you follow my link to see my first upload "Witness a Miracle" you'll see what I'm talking about. The first few moments after it comes into focus are key to watch, and it easier to see full screen. I swear this footage is genuine. p.s I'm not selling anything.
Time travel has nothing to do with what he just explained. As he said, he is not an expert.
Short correction : if you move in space really fast towards the center of galaxy and then come back, it cancels the "time travel" that you would have percieved (not actually lived).
WHY? : time travel is an illusion. It is like saying that we live in the past of a distant star because when we look at it, we see it millions of years back.
@veim2406 nope, what he said was pretty accurate. if you get two synced watches and one stayed on earth and the other went into space and back at x speed, the one on earth would have passed less time than the one that went through space, that's because time moves slower for the space man, it's nothing to do with stars form light, it's about speed and time.
@AlohaLittleDude The velocity forces resulting of revolving around the earth for a satellite might affect the mechanism of the synced watch, wich would result in giving the wrong "time".
I don't think time "flows". I think we don't understand what time is. Evidence of that would be the speed of light, defined by distance / time. Since the speed of light is independant of the relative movement of an other observer, it tells us that time is not what we think it is.
@balaalalaslk Stephen Hawking is motionless person. No matter how intelligent you are, if you cannot move, you become very limited in your thinking ability because you cannot draw or write with ease.
For all I know, Stephen Hawking has little to do with what he says. Have you seen this video ?
watch?v=xjBIsp8mS-c
All he can do is twich. Someone could be writting this entire speach for him and nobody would know about it.
Also mass slows down time so if you do take an airplane as you are further away from the earth (which has a great mass) that would slow down time regardless of how fast you are travelling.
so does the time travel you describe affect you merely physically or also mentally? I mean does it make you think slower also? Because if it affects you mentally as well that would indicate there's a direct correlation between matter and mind... I think, it might be that I'm so confused I'm writing complete rubbish, in which case you're more than welcome to correct me :)
@purplepaintpot i'm not sure if this answeres your question, but if you were to be put in a space shuttle traveling at speeds close to the speed of light, (in theory), your perception of time would be altered as well, and so 200 years on earth would seem like hours or just minutes to you. hope this helps
If we wanted to travel backwards in time, we had to increase the entropy of the whole universe but that requires more energy than the universe contains....
@FEE1DEAD also, we would need to drink a milkshake of strawberry, pineapple and grapefruit, and that tastes really bad, so nobody wants to time travel to the past
Merkabah moves within an all-embracing energy field which is composed of multiple magnetic, electromagnetic, and magneto-hydrodynamic domains unified into a “field stasis” using multiple polar denominations. The vehicle operating within the field the ability to go faster than the speed of our common light. With instant acceleration with power to travel at 2.9 times (or more) the speed of light as defined by man. The vehicle can go through these portals, time tunnels or “wormholes :)o*o
I like this discussion because I came up with my own theory. I believe that Ed was confused. See if you shot somebody on earth and then traveled to mars that instant at ten times the speed of light and then looked back you could see yourself shoot him because you beet the light to mars simulating time travel. Now I understand that but I don't understand how you age slower by moving fast so I just assume this is another one of Ed's can't tie his shoes problems
mass affects time... its been proven by something we all have on our phones these days... GPS. the satalites atom clocks would diverse from how they would run on earth and so make the first gps systems fail. this said something with great mass like a plannet or even better, a black hole, greatly affects time:). if you were to stand like close to a wormhole your time would be moving slower then my time.
I travel in time! Over the past year, I've moved forward a year, and you too. Another way of saying that is to say that we travel in time to the speed of 59 minutes per hour. The thing is that engineering can do some effective formula where we can move through time at varying speeds. Kissess dear Dean your videos are amazing keep it up! hugs!
How is backwards time travel possible? Theoretical physicists have said that the only way to travel back in time is to go forward to a time frame where computers are so advanced, they can recreate the past world.
i dont think this theory is right, how does speed affect the time, even if u are faster then light, u would maybe if u move away from an object see the light that comes from it like if u actually went back in time but if u go arround the world 1 time u see the object as if u would have stayed for the time traveling around the world in lightspeed takes. so u dont actually go back in time, u just see the light reflected by the objects u see like it was some time ago because the light u see travels
i don't get it..if something travels through time wouldn't it be nowhere?
since our future doesn't exist yet..
if our future does exist then our lifes are pretty much already lived and everything we do is just what time says we're gonna do, are doing and have done
and our past would be nothing but a memory unless everything leaves marks in time.
but that would mean our movements ain't movements but frames in time..
@noeel12 No, think of it like this, time is normal everywhere, but it is slowed down on the ship, so in reality they never time traveled, time just slowed down on their ship, causing them to age slower and therefore years may only seem like hours to those on the ship.
it is impossible to travel back in time but very possible to go forward it is impossible because traveling back in time would make you faster then the speed of light which we now know today is yes impossible also going forward would still be a hard thing to do and is very unlikely we will ever accomplish that, maybe later in time
@DeanLeysen I believe the concept applies strictly to speeds above the speed of light, because you are catching up with light... hell idk correct me if im wrong
@hat1324 there are no speeds above the speed of light, its like the universal speed limit :) i saw it on a stephen hawking thing on discovery that if something does reach the speed of light, time slows it down so it wouldnt go higher than the speed of light.
Some specifics (Relativity is my hobby) at 87% lightspeed the dilation is 2:1, so time on the ship is half the 'normal' rate, and 99.5% lightspeed time is dilated by 10 times, at 99.995% c time on the ship is 100 times slower than for us, so you could travel 10 light years of distance but just 6 weeks would elapse for the travellers.
Wouldn't it be possible to lower a person down a rope (rather low tech, NASA would have better ideas of course) close to a dark hole. From what I've read, time goes slower there as well due to the intense gravitational forces, so you'd wait down there and then come back up to find the rest (or at least the shuttle your rope was hanging on) have aged more.
@ph34rn0d34th yes in theory but you will get broken down to an atomic level... but ur atoms will hardly age...so yes... it will work..but u will die... :)
@toilet822 Of course people'd have to find some spot within the black hole's gravitational field where you'd have a delay in time, but not too close to get pulled apart. If that's possible of course.
@ph34rn0d34th i think the pint where time stands still is the point where u are most compressed...so the further away u are the faster u age... but there is probably a point where your aging slows, but you dont get ripped atom from atom.
@toilet822 That was exactly my point ;). Find the sweet spot where time slows down, but you'd still survive. Then stay there for a while, and when you get back (almost) everything else has been aged more. Though I wouldn't know how to determine how close to the dark hole you'd have to be for this to yield a significant time-travel effect. Also, I'm not sure if our technology would allow such operations, considering the forces involved at a black hole.
@ph34rn0d34th do what NASA did when they where unsure.... send in a couple of dogs and chimps.....
and no we do not have the ability to get to a black hole but as for the "rope" we have nano thread, made from carbon ( as strong as diamonds) that should stand up to the gravitational forces but to get optimum results a suit would need to be made to help the body cope with the extra gravity ( eg: 200x earths pull) (kinda like goku :P) but this would "in theory" make time travel possible..
@toilet822 For quite a while this entire discussion will remain purely theoretical haha.
Astronauts might as well be lowered in a small shuttle or something, not necessarily in a special swimsuit and a snorkle ;). I'm not sure for what reason we'd want to travel to the future anyways, if we can't go back. Might as well get cryogenically frozen and wait till the unfreeze you millenia later (and if they don't, you won't notice anyways).
@ph34rn0d34th time travel back in time is easier than forward.... if u circle the galaxy you will return before you left...and in theory meet yourself.. or if u travle at light speed for several min time would have progressed by several days..
If a spaceship flies at 99% the speed of light- a day on the ship will mean a year on earth... And there is one more way: the mass ... If a ship flies around a super massive black hole 1 day at the spaceship will mean 3 days on earth , and that's because the huge mass of the black hole... even GPS satelites from earth get a really really small delay ( something like 0.0000000001 seconds) because of the mass of the earth... so yeah... time travel is possible
Have you been reading the Chronicles of Narnia? Thing is when they go into the wardrobe or go into Narnia they live there for ages they grow up but when they return they are kids again. No time has passed. Maybe CS Lewis was onto something...mmm...
Sorry to out-physics your beautiful explanation Dean, but what you talked about won't work because special relativity only works in cases that the object is traveling at constant velocity and NOT accelerating. Since a spaceship coming back to Earth will involve turning around, this is a form of acceleration even if the speed remains the same, since velocity changes (since its a vector which is comprised of speed AND direction)
Yeah I learned that shit at school - about time it came in handy! :P
if there was a futuristic america,they would come from future to past on 9/11 to FUCKING KILL osama,tell them what to do,what was wrong,and give them fucking futuristic laser weapons and blueprints,powerfull PCs,and something like that so amira can rule the world.Or the Illuminati rules it in the future and this is why they didn't come to our times.
Wow not a lot of actual science in this or comments. Space and time are the same thing, not exclusive. Maybe some of you commenter s should check out quantum physics, something Einstein spent the majority of his life trying to disprove.
well you can travel forward in time when you reach the event horizon of a black hole because every point is downward which is forward for time, so if you survive passing the event horizon the universe will go to finish in a snap while being blue due to gamma rays
Time travel will never be possible, because seconds, minutes, hours, days etc are just a way of measuring. What has already happened has already happened and theres no way of going back to any event that has already occured.. and what is going to happen has not yet happened yet and doesn't actually exsist yet.
Your theory on what could technically be called time travel is about as close as we're going to get.
I've heard that gravity and time are also relative. Theoretically if you approach a black hole, due to the immensity of the gravitational force you will undergo, time would almost stop completely for you relative to people on Earth. Although the only thing is that it would be impossible to get close enough to a black hole as it would likely crush you down to infinite density or rip you into infinitely small pieces... lots of theoretical stuff.
Very nice theories lads but let's be honest.. moving on the edge of the speed of light? The G forces will crush you to pieces long before you reach that kind of speed. And if you could move at the speed of light, it will mean you will become one with light and vannish. Just sayin'.
Because the speed of light is an asymptotic speed, it is unreachable, but the more energy you put into moving something, the closer it gets. however, once you start approaching the speed of light, energy would rather transform back into matter, like a backwards atomic bomb, rather then accelerate.
This has to do with the famous equation F=MA
This just shows how truly hard it is to bend time, or i guess distort spacial relativity.
@Lazorchikin Maybe they already did or are doing it,
but by revealing that they are from the future or saying something to you,that already alters the timeline and therefore could be catastrofical for the person that came from the future or us. but theory 2 would be that time travel could only be possible when we are in some kind of staces and not in our physical body so there for we cannot speak touch or do anything but we can watch certain parts from history.
@nousernamesleftatall No, they were 'invented' because Einsteins theory alone doesn't work at a microscopic level. M-theory does. twelve dimensions are required to reconcile them.
What I never understood about this is sure. From the reference point of earth, the ship is moving at incredible speeds, but from the reference point of the ship, it's the earth that's moving incredibly fast. Why is 'time' relatively slower on the ship than the earth?
It's is said that U cannot move back in time, but very possible too move forward in time if time slowed down.. But I guess anything is possible cause all I hear R Theory's.. Where is the real proof of Time Travel?
Returning to Earth would mean you'd have to go the speed of light and then slow down. You'd age (in their view) horrifically fast as you returned to their space and time. While you slow down your "time" will slow down too, meaning you'd see them age terribly slow from the time you achieved the speed of light. Essentially as you travel faster your "time" becomes less dense as you occupy more "space", while slowing down reverses this.
@seenlicious You're implying that obtaining information from a mostly reliable source and conveying it over a different medium as a form of entertainment isn't a normal/moral thing to do.
I believe its time to start dancing in a funny fashion in public and yell, "ILL STOP WHEN YOUR ALL DEAD!"
GuyNamedHonzik 1 week ago
Actually your hand would get older if you click subscribe because it has to do more work than staying still. If your right handed then your left arm is probably two times younger than your right arm and will have less wrinkles and smaller wines but you should subscribe anyway because it makes you look smart :D I think wines is typed wrong
rolandrebase 1 week ago
@rolandrebase wrinkles and ageing are two different things, no?
MyrTariniel 4 days ago
Space-time.
TheWalf999 2 weeks ago
Temperature affects time....
SirBser 3 weeks ago
From the time that science can digitalize molecules and then materialize them we will have 3 new inventions:
Duplication/Cloning: copy the person and materialize them elsewhere
Teleport machine: The same as cloning but with killing the first person
Time travel machine: The same as the teleport but with a delay between each action
(because we know we can't go back in time)
championkoppie 3 weeks ago
so by throwing my cat at my wall, I'm actually increasing it's life because it's moving therefore making it younger?
or something like that :P
erikthemagicalpanda 1 month ago 3
k so he said we can travel back in time. how?
irealydodominate 1 month ago
Actually, with the position of my computer, I am going against Earth's natural movement, therefore I am going slower than the normal 428mph that we have.
Austin101123 1 month ago
i travel in time on a daily basis..........Forward
casian113 1 month ago
my theori is that time will elapse for ever it will never have a stop, so there must been someone travling back in time like in the movies and we'd see it, by now or it will never happen since time is for ever and they in futher it must always be some fool who decide to go to this time, if time is going on for ever, its almost 100% sure someone would,
Iniciate1 1 month ago
Who actually subscribed to Dean?
xjFIRST 2 months ago
Funny that people don't know what a theory is. It's Science 1o1, the scientific method.
benbmusic88 2 months ago
@benbmusic88 no its the best possible answer.
iModzClan 1 month ago
That isn't correct.
It is only correct if the person in space keeps drifting farther away.
But when he wants to come back, he needs to accelerate.
Thus causing a change of inertial frames.
At least, that's what they taught me in college.
DvPloegae 2 months ago
So by theory my right hand is a lot younger than the rest of n\my body? Well it is, as insignificantly it may be.
539forgotten 2 months ago 10
so my semin is a young adult by the time it hit the floor ?
DGAFyourTHOUGHTS 2 months ago
then we yust need to keep running abd never stop we will never age than hahaha :D .
EarthNacionalist 2 months ago
@EarthNacionalist
It's a known fact that people who take up jogging live longer, though I'm not sure THIS is the correlation :D
Daymjo 2 months ago
My left hand is really young then i guess.
MrLakuz 2 months ago
and my wirst is really young
houk3 2 months ago
I click your add then close the windows of the add, that's how much i like you .
houk3 2 months ago
so if your in constant motion like exercise , you would be technically younger than if you weren't as active?
TehWorldVids 3 months ago
@TehWorldVids You'll die a few nanoseconds later.
JEEZUSCHRYSTLER 3 months ago
If time travel is possible i would go back to roman times 21st century sucks
TheGreatMercenary 3 months ago
wow im unsubscribing from ogfurious and subscribing to this channel instead
DropD71 3 months ago
You kinda got it wrong, The only way time would go past in the hundreds on earth while you're out in space, is if you're travelling near light speed, this is due to the fact that light is maximum speed, you cannot go faster. And while travelling at light speed and moving around in the spaceship should technically make you go faster than light speed, nature doesn't allow it by slowing time down to make this rule of physics still apply. Time travel is possible in other ways, but I'm out of space.
Drunkayyy1 3 months ago
Well time travel is technically possible, if you are in the US at 2:00 pm on Saturday, and you go to Japan or something it will be like 1 am. on Sunday. When you travel back to the US, you are time traveling back to 2pm. on the same Saturday
Also with the daylight saving time thing, when the clock says 1:59am, the second it says 2:00 we will automatically go back one hour to 1am, this is kind of like time traveling. What do you guys think? :)
BugTownBuggly 4 months ago
@BugTownBuggly no.
nubsrawr 4 months ago
MY QUESTION IS Do you find it uncomfortable to answer personal question?
ghostt23 4 months ago
that intro reminded me of Arnold Schwarzenegger in Commando
Jehanzeb14 4 months ago
Did he say can or cant travel backwards? i though that the only ways to go backwards were very strange ways that have only been theoryised, must of them involve going past the speed of light using a black holes grazity or the more releastic one for us, using millions of intersecing lazers to bend space space and thus creat a type of wormhole, mite be wrong though but there about the only two theorys ive heard, then again you could just buy a delorean:P
messi996 4 months ago
incorrect.
firstly, for a living being, it is possible to travel forward (faster than the normal rate, I mean) but not backwards.
secondly, it is only possible for massless particles to timetravel backwards if the wormhole has been open since or before the time it wishes to go to, and that the particle can be isolated i.e. no quantum fields, which is otherwise not possible.
nicktohzyu 4 months ago in playlist More videos from DeanLeysen
now i get it. i forgot to rule in the different reference frame to account. :(
but,the argument stands still with both CERN researchers neglecting their original data after taking account how relativity affected their data and the researchers at Netherlands, backing up the original data after taking in relativity to account. i guess we just have to wait for a few more years for any of the theories to be confirmed. :)
i really like if C can be broken, so that C travel can actually b mde pssble
XRockVstarI499 4 months ago
relativity is a theory my friend. the fact that it is a theory means that its never proven correct because there is no way to prove it absolute. and besides, the internet is a whole different topic. einstein was limited to what he can do with the tech that exist in his time. we now have the tech to prove it, and the scientists at CERN used it and proved him wrong about light being the fastest thing in the universe, by accident.
XRockVstarI499 4 months ago
@XRockVstarI499 a scientific theory is as close to a certainty as it gets pretty much, gravity is called a theory, the term isn't used in science the way people generally use it.
We're also in practice applying the concept of relativity by having GPS satellites send their signals to us out of synch, taking into account relativity; so that they would arrive in synch. If we wouldn't do this, no GPS in the world would be accurate; so I suppose there's your proof. :)
DeanLeysen 4 months ago 44
@DeanLeysen oh, and p/s : could you please post a video about REM sleep? :)
XRockVstarI499 4 months ago
@DeanLeysen actually i think it is called the law of gravity rather than the theory. jus'sayin.
kikkavella 2 months ago
@kikkavella Wikipedia on theories: "A scientific theory is a set of principles that explain and predict phenomena. Scientists create scientific theories with the scientific method, when they are originally proposed as hypotheses and tested for accuracy through observations and experiments. Once a hypothesis is verified, it becomes a theory." Also, physical laws predict behavior without describing 'why' it happens. Theories explain the 'why'.
Muskar2 1 month ago
@XRockVstarI499 The scientists at CERN didn't make anything go faster than light. It was a miscalculation.
ArthurJProwlick 4 months ago in playlist More videos from DeanLeysen
@XRockVstarI499 In science the word Theory doesnt mean that at all. A hypothosis becomes a theory after it HAS been proven to be true in multiple tests.
TheBuddhaFist 3 months ago
Comment removed
wrmoysey 3 months ago
@XRockVstarI499 Having said that, it has caused the entire scientific community to question both the experiment and Einstein's theory, which will lead to a much higher quality and quantity of experiments scrutinizing both. This in turn will lead to a much more accurate and definitive theory regarding relativity to account for the results, whether that be a modification or a reinforcement of the existing theory. Challenging beliefs will always result in a more accurate definition of our world :).
wrmoysey 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@XRockVstarI499 Pretty much everyone in the scientific world, including the scientists at CERN who did the experiment, are very skeptical of their findings about neutrinos being faster then light, and are not willing to accept them as accurate yet. One experiment is not enough to disprove thousands of experiments done over a span of about 60 years.
wrmoysey 3 months ago
@XRockVstarI499
I'm having this debate with someone on another video, hope you're smarter.
1. Neutrinos faster than light haven't been PROVEN yet.
2. In physics, something that leaves from X and arrives at Y faster than light isn't equivalent to saying that it's faster than light
3. General Relativity doesn't rule completely rule out particles 'relatively' moving faster than the speed of light.
Srsly... Relativity is not a theory, it's got probably a million proofs, how many more do u need?
Daymjo 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Daymjo i travel in time on a daily basis..........Forward
casian113 1 month ago
@XRockVstarI499
The speed of light was not broken, they made errors in measurement or calculation somewhere along the line. Secondly, relativity has been proven - experiments have shown that time is distorted in orbit (space-time curvature) and that space-time is indeed warped around the earth.
MrChimei 1 month ago
@XRockVstarI499 The neutrino experiment did not, in fact, disprove anything we know about physics, and there are several theories that allow for the possibility of PERCEIVED faster-than-light travel, without breaking any laws of physics. (Such as the Alcubierre drive.)
7Slayde 1 month ago
@XRockVstarI499 a theory is only considered true if there is proof, and is said to be true until an other experiment or event prove it wrong.
ArtTheRussian 1 month ago
@XRockVstarI499 A theory, properly used does not mean a guess or a supposition. It is not something waiting to be proven, to grow up into a fact. A theory is somethign far greater than a fact could ever be. A theory is a well supported explanatory structure capable of explaining and predicting a range of phenomena.
A fact is just an isolated tidbit of knowledge But a theory organizes facts, concepts and predictions into a functional, scientific framework.
ExNihiloish 2 weeks ago
@XRockVstarI499 really well i just read that cern think the reading may have been caused by a loose fibre optic cable linkin them to a gsp system. they have yet to confirm that to be true but will be releasing a stament about it soon.
kdudesmyth 2 weeks ago
einstein's whole concept on special relativity was based on the fact that light is the fastest thing in the universe. turns out, scientists at CERN found out that neutrinos can travel faster than light. so, his whole concept is basically in jeopardy of being wrong because his fundamental idea was wrong.
XRockVstarI499 4 months ago
@XRockVstarI499 If relativity was even slightly wrong, the Internet would not exist for you to write that inane comment.
Zerkerefeia 4 months ago
einstein was wrong
XRockVstarI499 4 months ago
@XRockVstarI499 ? why you think that?
MrDpsc 4 months ago
I don't understand this ... Might as well bring a walkie talkie for communicating between from earth and being in a shuttle at the same "time"
foreverxviibtq 5 months ago
im sure you only have to go around 80mph.... didnt u see back to the future?
hman96rock 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I guess everyone's hear the latest breakthrough as of a few days ago saying time travel may be possible at least at a subatomic level.
I wonder if something I've stumbled across could open new doors in scientific research. If you follow my link to see my first upload "Witness a Miracle" you'll see what I'm talking about. The first few moments after it comes into focus are key to watch, and it easier to see full screen. I swear this footage is genuine. p.s I'm not selling anything.
veracityfilms 5 months ago
Time travel is impossible.
Time travel has nothing to do with what he just explained. As he said, he is not an expert.
Short correction : if you move in space really fast towards the center of galaxy and then come back, it cancels the "time travel" that you would have percieved (not actually lived).
WHY? : time travel is an illusion. It is like saying that we live in the past of a distant star because when we look at it, we see it millions of years back.
get it? of course not..
veim2406 5 months ago
@veim2406 nope, what he said was pretty accurate. if you get two synced watches and one stayed on earth and the other went into space and back at x speed, the one on earth would have passed less time than the one that went through space, that's because time moves slower for the space man, it's nothing to do with stars form light, it's about speed and time.
AlohaLittleDude 5 months ago
@AlohaLittleDude The velocity forces resulting of revolving around the earth for a satellite might affect the mechanism of the synced watch, wich would result in giving the wrong "time".
I don't think time "flows". I think we don't understand what time is. Evidence of that would be the speed of light, defined by distance / time. Since the speed of light is independant of the relative movement of an other observer, it tells us that time is not what we think it is.
veim2406 5 months ago
@veim2406 I think Stephen Hawking is an "expert" and he says that Time Travel to the future is very much possible
there are many ways to time travel, either take a space ship and orbit a black hole, or travel close to the speed of light
time travel to the past might be possible as well, because particles that travel faster than the speed of light have been discovered
balaalalaslk 5 months ago
@balaalalaslk Stephen Hawking is motionless person. No matter how intelligent you are, if you cannot move, you become very limited in your thinking ability because you cannot draw or write with ease.
For all I know, Stephen Hawking has little to do with what he says. Have you seen this video ?
watch?v=xjBIsp8mS-c
All he can do is twich. Someone could be writting this entire speach for him and nobody would know about it.
veim2406 5 months ago
wiibot15 lol i thought tha same thing
scribble561 5 months ago
Also mass slows down time so if you do take an airplane as you are further away from the earth (which has a great mass) that would slow down time regardless of how fast you are travelling.
absoluteterror93 5 months ago
will the human body be capable travelling at the speed of light?
or will it get crushed because of the force?
1deividas1 6 months ago
Hhaha this guys interesting and funny! =)
JackMatthewCornish 6 months ago
So, That means I'm getting older and thus dying faster by sitting down watching your videos...
(dot)...(dot)...(dot)
Watch Dean Lysen's videos makes you die!
LMAO xDDD
wiibot15 6 months ago in playlist More videos from DeanLeysen
so does the time travel you describe affect you merely physically or also mentally? I mean does it make you think slower also? Because if it affects you mentally as well that would indicate there's a direct correlation between matter and mind... I think, it might be that I'm so confused I'm writing complete rubbish, in which case you're more than welcome to correct me :)
purplepaintpot 6 months ago in playlist More videos from DeanLeysen
@purplepaintpot time traveling in this sense doesnt make you age slower or think slower, you basically just skip over time.
TheDarthturd 6 months ago
@purplepaintpot i'm not sure if this answeres your question, but if you were to be put in a space shuttle traveling at speeds close to the speed of light, (in theory), your perception of time would be altered as well, and so 200 years on earth would seem like hours or just minutes to you. hope this helps
JSLSampaio 6 months ago
......i'm afraid to move
robsmith000 6 months ago
But I use my nose to like videos.
RafaelFeyenoordfan 6 months ago 32
If we wanted to travel backwards in time, we had to increase the entropy of the whole universe but that requires more energy than the universe contains....
FEE1DEAD 6 months ago
@FEE1DEAD also, we would need to drink a milkshake of strawberry, pineapple and grapefruit, and that tastes really bad, so nobody wants to time travel to the past
JSLSampaio 6 months ago
@JSLSampaio xD
FEE1DEAD 6 months ago
that is not time travel. That is the effects of time or aging. You're not "traveling" through "time." Aging is way different than time traveling.
JonBandMiley 6 months ago
We
Can travel in the future
Its called
Sleeping
axeyguitar888 6 months ago
Merkabah moves within an all-embracing energy field which is composed of multiple magnetic, electromagnetic, and magneto-hydrodynamic domains unified into a “field stasis” using multiple polar denominations. The vehicle operating within the field the ability to go faster than the speed of our common light. With instant acceleration with power to travel at 2.9 times (or more) the speed of light as defined by man. The vehicle can go through these portals, time tunnels or “wormholes :)o*o
TimeTravelTruther 6 months ago
I like this discussion because I came up with my own theory. I believe that Ed was confused. See if you shot somebody on earth and then traveled to mars that instant at ten times the speed of light and then looked back you could see yourself shoot him because you beet the light to mars simulating time travel. Now I understand that but I don't understand how you age slower by moving fast so I just assume this is another one of Ed's can't tie his shoes problems
paralyzerisme3 6 months ago
mass affects time... its been proven by something we all have on our phones these days... GPS. the satalites atom clocks would diverse from how they would run on earth and so make the first gps systems fail. this said something with great mass like a plannet or even better, a black hole, greatly affects time:). if you were to stand like close to a wormhole your time would be moving slower then my time.
0sba 6 months ago
Comment removed
0sba 6 months ago
I travel in time! Over the past year, I've moved forward a year, and you too. Another way of saying that is to say that we travel in time to the speed of 59 minutes per hour. The thing is that engineering can do some effective formula where we can move through time at varying speeds. Kissess dear Dean your videos are amazing keep it up! hugs!
duarejul 6 months ago
How is backwards time travel possible? Theoretical physicists have said that the only way to travel back in time is to go forward to a time frame where computers are so advanced, they can recreate the past world.
Coax116 6 months ago
sorry for any grammar mistakes :f
JohnnylFreak 6 months ago
i dont think this theory is right, how does speed affect the time, even if u are faster then light, u would maybe if u move away from an object see the light that comes from it like if u actually went back in time but if u go arround the world 1 time u see the object as if u would have stayed for the time traveling around the world in lightspeed takes. so u dont actually go back in time, u just see the light reflected by the objects u see like it was some time ago because the light u see travels
JohnnylFreak 6 months ago
wow comments about masturbating are really original
Anonymous0044 7 months ago
@DeanLeysen Would your same idea on traveling THROUGH time apply to traveling BACK in time?
onretilom 7 months ago
i don't get it..if something travels through time wouldn't it be nowhere?
since our future doesn't exist yet..
if our future does exist then our lifes are pretty much already lived and everything we do is just what time says we're gonna do, are doing and have done
and our past would be nothing but a memory unless everything leaves marks in time.
but that would mean our movements ain't movements but frames in time..
noeel12 7 months ago
@noeel12 No, think of it like this, time is normal everywhere, but it is slowed down on the ship, so in reality they never time traveled, time just slowed down on their ship, causing them to age slower and therefore years may only seem like hours to those on the ship.
oBLACKIECHANoo 7 months ago
@oBLACKIECHANoo i know what u mean but that's like ''faster than light'' traveling
i'm talking about wormhole traveling
noeel12 7 months ago
@noeel12 u have to listen, u arent able to timetravel into future, only into the past (right at the beginning)
JohnnylFreak 6 months ago
Smell like teen spirit? o.o
kkey2112 7 months ago
Subscribed in the name of science
fredin90 7 months ago
it is impossible to travel back in time but very possible to go forward it is impossible because traveling back in time would make you faster then the speed of light which we now know today is yes impossible also going forward would still be a hard thing to do and is very unlikely we will ever accomplish that, maybe later in time
AlexRaveloTV 7 months ago
@DeanLeysen I believe the concept applies strictly to speeds above the speed of light, because you are catching up with light... hell idk correct me if im wrong
hat1324 7 months ago
@hat1324 there are no speeds above the speed of light, its like the universal speed limit :) i saw it on a stephen hawking thing on discovery that if something does reach the speed of light, time slows it down so it wouldnt go higher than the speed of light.
THEdudeINaSHIRT 7 months ago
Fap to the future,
ANimouz 7 months ago
porn give us feedback like how to make baby!! XD
Ghostkiller05 7 months ago
clicked like whit my feet.... i have baby feet
BLOWBACKKID 7 months ago
How are you so clever?
Graceygiggle 7 months ago
@TheKKK192 .... thats what she said:s
Nickey90 7 months ago
Anyone not going to make a masturbation joke? It'd be a novelty.
Nagassh 7 months ago
Movement makes a body part stay younger?
Hmm, that would explain why my piece still works pretty well...
TheRandomTrax 7 months ago
Some specifics (Relativity is my hobby) at 87% lightspeed the dilation is 2:1, so time on the ship is half the 'normal' rate, and 99.5% lightspeed time is dilated by 10 times, at 99.995% c time on the ship is 100 times slower than for us, so you could travel 10 light years of distance but just 6 weeks would elapse for the travellers.
astrophonix 7 months ago
24 PEOPLE WANNA STAY OLD
law1330 7 months ago
Lol
TakingAndChanging 7 months ago
If err, movement makes my right hand younger.. I think my right hand is A LOT younger than the rest of my body. I uh, move it. A lot.
cheesehead9099 7 months ago 99
@cheesehead9099 why u sayin the exact same thing as the top comment
happysexytimee 5 months ago
@cheesehead9099 my left hand is a lot younger ;)
Llamanatior 4 months ago
I want to see more of the guy at the intro in order to stop another Columbine massacre.
jokacho21 7 months ago
Wouldn't it be possible to lower a person down a rope (rather low tech, NASA would have better ideas of course) close to a dark hole. From what I've read, time goes slower there as well due to the intense gravitational forces, so you'd wait down there and then come back up to find the rest (or at least the shuttle your rope was hanging on) have aged more.
Plausible?
ph34rn0d34th 7 months ago
@ph34rn0d34th yes in theory but you will get broken down to an atomic level... but ur atoms will hardly age...so yes... it will work..but u will die... :)
toilet822 7 months ago
@toilet822 Of course people'd have to find some spot within the black hole's gravitational field where you'd have a delay in time, but not too close to get pulled apart. If that's possible of course.
ph34rn0d34th 7 months ago
@ph34rn0d34th i think the pint where time stands still is the point where u are most compressed...so the further away u are the faster u age... but there is probably a point where your aging slows, but you dont get ripped atom from atom.
toilet822 7 months ago
@toilet822 That was exactly my point ;). Find the sweet spot where time slows down, but you'd still survive. Then stay there for a while, and when you get back (almost) everything else has been aged more. Though I wouldn't know how to determine how close to the dark hole you'd have to be for this to yield a significant time-travel effect. Also, I'm not sure if our technology would allow such operations, considering the forces involved at a black hole.
ph34rn0d34th 7 months ago
@ph34rn0d34th do what NASA did when they where unsure.... send in a couple of dogs and chimps.....
and no we do not have the ability to get to a black hole but as for the "rope" we have nano thread, made from carbon ( as strong as diamonds) that should stand up to the gravitational forces but to get optimum results a suit would need to be made to help the body cope with the extra gravity ( eg: 200x earths pull) (kinda like goku :P) but this would "in theory" make time travel possible..
toilet822 7 months ago
@toilet822 For quite a while this entire discussion will remain purely theoretical haha.
Astronauts might as well be lowered in a small shuttle or something, not necessarily in a special swimsuit and a snorkle ;). I'm not sure for what reason we'd want to travel to the future anyways, if we can't go back. Might as well get cryogenically frozen and wait till the unfreeze you millenia later (and if they don't, you won't notice anyways).
ph34rn0d34th 7 months ago
@ph34rn0d34th time travel back in time is easier than forward.... if u circle the galaxy you will return before you left...and in theory meet yourself.. or if u travle at light speed for several min time would have progressed by several days..
toilet822 7 months ago
If a spaceship flies at 99% the speed of light- a day on the ship will mean a year on earth... And there is one more way: the mass ... If a ship flies around a super massive black hole 1 day at the spaceship will mean 3 days on earth , and that's because the huge mass of the black hole... even GPS satelites from earth get a really really small delay ( something like 0.0000000001 seconds) because of the mass of the earth... so yeah... time travel is possible
epic004 7 months ago
less emotion relationships talk more wierd physics plox
but that's not what man's very interested about, is it?
ayernee 7 months ago
0:08 Itchy beard time :D
Unholyspaghetti 7 months ago
Have you been reading the Chronicles of Narnia? Thing is when they go into the wardrobe or go into Narnia they live there for ages they grow up but when they return they are kids again. No time has passed. Maybe CS Lewis was onto something...mmm...
iseeeverythinginmono 7 months ago
Sorry to out-physics your beautiful explanation Dean, but what you talked about won't work because special relativity only works in cases that the object is traveling at constant velocity and NOT accelerating. Since a spaceship coming back to Earth will involve turning around, this is a form of acceleration even if the speed remains the same, since velocity changes (since its a vector which is comprised of speed AND direction)
Yeah I learned that shit at school - about time it came in handy! :P
fizzle96 7 months ago
if there was a futuristic america,they would come from future to past on 9/11 to FUCKING KILL osama,tell them what to do,what was wrong,and give them fucking futuristic laser weapons and blueprints,powerfull PCs,and something like that so amira can rule the world.Or the Illuminati rules it in the future and this is why they didn't come to our times.
MrBrebuci 7 months ago
DFTBA all the way!
Djinne98 7 months ago
Can't remember what the title is, but there is a doco with Steven Hawkins about the possibility of moving only into the future. :P
FlowermanThe 7 months ago
looks like 21 people have parkinsons disease
conorthedestroyer 7 months ago
looks like 21 people don't own a delorian
conorthedestroyer 7 months ago
I think my right hand is like 2 years younger than the rest of my body lol
xblackb0x 7 months ago
I love this topic... It's so funny, I have just watched a charlieissocoollike video about this xD
Of course time travel is possible, just ask Doctor Who about it! :D
7xXcookieXx7 7 months ago
tu es intelligent...et cest pas la premiere fois je le dis lol
ankudr 7 months ago
Brad Sucks are such a great band! Look them up! 1.32!
frizzboo123 7 months ago
Wow not a lot of actual science in this or comments. Space and time are the same thing, not exclusive. Maybe some of you commenter s should check out quantum physics, something Einstein spent the majority of his life trying to disprove.
VillageOfGeeks 7 months ago
harry potter :D
BeBeAyumiReturns 7 months ago
I click the like with my face, it has to look more younger or ladies no like
CheSterXz0z 7 months ago
I wouldn't call that time travel. But that's very interesting.
lololol36 7 months ago
A bit off-topic but why do ppl say that if you laugh you live longer, cause time goes faster when you have fun:/
BroJanek 8 months ago
Soooo, in theory.... my right hand is younger then most of my body? giggity
nathangek 8 months ago 184
@nathangek lol
darrinstampe 5 months ago
well you can travel forward in time when you reach the event horizon of a black hole because every point is downward which is forward for time, so if you survive passing the event horizon the universe will go to finish in a snap while being blue due to gamma rays
prestftw 8 months ago
Sleeping is time traveling, u close ur eyes at 23.00, open them the next moment at 09.00 next day. Omg u just skipped 10 hours ahead! trololol :P
GwnMiike 8 months ago
@GwnMiike Stupid but funny comment, you and me could possibly get along. LOL
pigpig278 8 months ago
Dean, Can you answer me why people have a spitting habit?
Bokem44 8 months ago
Time travel will never be possible, because seconds, minutes, hours, days etc are just a way of measuring. What has already happened has already happened and theres no way of going back to any event that has already occured.. and what is going to happen has not yet happened yet and doesn't actually exsist yet.
Your theory on what could technically be called time travel is about as close as we're going to get.
venomvixen 8 months ago
I've heard that gravity and time are also relative. Theoretically if you approach a black hole, due to the immensity of the gravitational force you will undergo, time would almost stop completely for you relative to people on Earth. Although the only thing is that it would be impossible to get close enough to a black hole as it would likely crush you down to infinite density or rip you into infinitely small pieces... lots of theoretical stuff.
lostprophets0rok 8 months ago
Very nice theories lads but let's be honest.. moving on the edge of the speed of light? The G forces will crush you to pieces long before you reach that kind of speed. And if you could move at the speed of light, it will mean you will become one with light and vannish. Just sayin'.
BollettjePretVet 8 months ago
I actually remember sending you this exact same theory of mine around a month or two ago, weird..
iamkini 8 months ago
Learn to speak like a normal person, you fuckface
Frejare 8 months ago
its really hard to change relativity.
Because the speed of light is an asymptotic speed, it is unreachable, but the more energy you put into moving something, the closer it gets. however, once you start approaching the speed of light, energy would rather transform back into matter, like a backwards atomic bomb, rather then accelerate.
This has to do with the famous equation F=MA
This just shows how truly hard it is to bend time, or i guess distort spacial relativity.
good fight time travel.
vevenaneathna 8 months ago
so masterbating=partial time travel.. just saying
nmuller789 8 months ago
If you hibernate yourself, then its a forward time travelling :)
damagepy 8 months ago
i didn't know you were smart.....
mixmaster1990 8 months ago
thats cool but can that really be called time "traveling" ?
mnniemouse12 8 months ago
@mnniemouse12 essentially yes because you are traveling through space in order to "skip" ahead of time.
carlosboo1 8 months ago
thats why time slows down when you do nothing -.-
CELLERTOTEN 8 months ago
Here's my theory, if time travel was in fact possible, wouldn't someone from the future have already visited us?
Lazorchikin 8 months ago
@Lazorchikin Maybe they already did or are doing it,
but by revealing that they are from the future or saying something to you,that already alters the timeline and therefore could be catastrofical for the person that came from the future or us. but theory 2 would be that time travel could only be possible when we are in some kind of staces and not in our physical body so there for we cannot speak touch or do anything but we can watch certain parts from history.
Our body is time related.
2308Pascal 8 months ago
@nousernamesleftatall No, they were 'invented' because Einsteins theory alone doesn't work at a microscopic level. M-theory does. twelve dimensions are required to reconcile them.
TSFMaster 8 months ago
What I never understood about this is sure. From the reference point of earth, the ship is moving at incredible speeds, but from the reference point of the ship, it's the earth that's moving incredibly fast. Why is 'time' relatively slower on the ship than the earth?
WWLinkMasterX 8 months ago
Is that why people who do triathlons and run marathons regularly have a longer life span?
burritoboy726 8 months ago
if u guys wanna travel back in time, just get a animus :)
CaptianVyne 8 months ago
Same thing works for the dislike button as well dan
kungfuseadog 8 months ago
thats deep yo
SCplusKC 8 months ago
It's is said that U cannot move back in time, but very possible too move forward in time if time slowed down.. But I guess anything is possible cause all I hear R Theory's.. Where is the real proof of Time Travel?
shadowgam3 8 months ago
Fucking Inertial Frames of Reference. How do they work?
Jacquibim 8 months ago
Returning to Earth would mean you'd have to go the speed of light and then slow down. You'd age (in their view) horrifically fast as you returned to their space and time. While you slow down your "time" will slow down too, meaning you'd see them age terribly slow from the time you achieved the speed of light. Essentially as you travel faster your "time" becomes less dense as you occupy more "space", while slowing down reverses this.
Yiyas 8 months ago
i can read wikipedia too dean... only tho wiki wont beg me to like and subscribe every week
seenlicious 8 months ago 5
@seenlicious You're implying that obtaining information from a mostly reliable source and conveying it over a different medium as a form of entertainment isn't a normal/moral thing to do.
alaman321 7 months ago