Political correct movement is about hiding the hate-mongering and criminality that goes on behind the scenes. If they look and superficially behave in a "politically correct" manner nobody can accuse them hate-mongering and criminality that they are really doing behind the scenes.
After the police state has been crushed under the weight of its own creation and society has collapsed, a new society with far fewer restrictions will emerge.
I would propose that in this society freedom of speech should come with a right to demarcate an area in which intentional distruptors would be smacked upside the head with a baseball bat or some similar appliance.
This would leave certain individuals with only themselves to blame for any injuries incurred.
There's no such thing as hate speech. It's just used as an excuse to censor somthing you dont like without seeming like a hypocrite when you say you believe in freedom of speech. Also, having an alternative explanation for what causes homosexuality does not mean you hate gay people. You can say gays aren't born gay while still promoting their freedom to practice gay sex.
I bring it up because it's an affront to justice and truth. I would bring it up if it occurred 50 years ago. Obviously, that's not even an argument though. We must fight leftist totalitarianism regardless of who advocates for it. Yes, most of the people protesting were lesbians. Yet why anyone would act is such a manner is beyond reckoning. Why don't you try respecting diversity?
fine, i can see why you bring it up. however, you obviously don't know the facts regarding this protest and are saying really ridiculous things that you don't actually know are true or not.
Here's what his book said: "A little over one‐hundred and fifty years ago, the first concept of an inborn homosexual condition began to circulate in Germany. Prior to this time there is no known record of any human being ever claiming to have been born with
same‐sex attractions (SSA)". Here's your lie: "there have been homosexuals for longer than 150 years." Anyone who reads this can now see that you are a complete and sick liar, lol. Again, there's no hate in his position.
you mistunderstood AGAIN. i was pointing out your misuse of the phrase "lesbian activists" because they were just activists in general. you dont have to be gay to stand up for gays. thats called common sense, dear baldy.
also, due to the fact that you state "i didnt even know who ryan sorba was until i saw the videos"... you have never read his book, and thus do not know whether it does contain hate speech or not.
No, I got to read the pdf the link of which is available for all those who see this video in the comments bar. Its worth reading. You have asserted that it is hate speech. Why is it hate speech. Everyone who reads this: please feel free to argue and refute the lesbian intolerance machine. They can't think they're way out of a paper bag. Why is thinking people aren't born gay hate speech? It isn't.
Anyone who's a lesbian activist and not gay is an absurdity. OWNEEEEDDDD, pig.
You're not going to insult me on my channel. Thinking that gays are not born gay is not an act of hate. It is not akin to slavery or Jim Crow. I'll give you another chance to think and argue. Why is Mr. Sorba thinking that gays are not born gay hate speech? Please explain.
to deny a group of people legitimacy is HATE. ryan sorba attempted to strip the gay community of their legitimacy by denying their history (the history he present was inaccurate...there have been homosexuals for longer than 150 years. da vinci was a homo), and by infering that homosexuality is not natural.
I'm not sure if you are familiar with the holocaust, but that was the basis of Nazism. to deny a group of people their legitimacy as a means of erasing them.
He doesn't deny anyone legitimacy. Saying I wasn't born a writer doesn't deny the legitimacy of my being a writer now. He never said that in his book that homosexuals have only been around for 150 years. What page is that on? Oh, that's right you're making it up. He's entitled to his views and you're entitled to yours. You and the rest of your hysterical horde should refute his positions with logic. This has nothing to do with the holocaust. Okay, he made his argument, are gays now erased?
hey baldy, more than half of those "lesbian activists" were NOT actually gay. just good people shutting down hate speech. get your facts straight before you start preaching
hey pig, lesbian activists not being gay is absurd. Furthermore, you should give diversity a try. There was no hate speech in Sorba's book. It's perfectly fine for someone to disagree with you. He thinks people are not born gay. What you should do is come up with arguments to refute him rather than shout him down. Only cowards shut others down...you weak brainwashed loser.
I don't agree with the Smith student reaction, but do you honestly think hate-speech like this should be condoned through allowing ryan sorba to continue?
No, Sorba made zero in the way of hate speech. He just thinks people are not born gay. There's nothing hateful about that. Personally I disagree with him but you should try respecting his diversity.
I would bring suit to them for violating my right to free assembly, if I were him. I would say to the officer that one can not be ordered to stop speaking at a peaceful assembly.
P.C. is THE WORST. So detrimental to the progression of society and the human race in general. One day of media void of P.C. would be insanely potent to the thoughtless masses, as it's the media that shapes so many facets of us and our lives, whether we know it or not.
The attraction to a particular morphology IS controlled by genes. The reason almost all Men are attracted to the hourglass and Women to the V shape is due to our genetic makeup. But it's a sliding scale.
My background in molecular biology gives me a solid basis for this opinion but, that being said, I would actively protest what happened at that meeting. Silencing opposition through violence and intimidation is ALWAYS wrong.
The worst human rights offender in this case is the University.
@sirskeptic Well first, he was heavily funded by the Rockefellers (they're into eugenics and depopulation) and Kinsey'd methodology was bias and criminal. You may g=have heard of the military industrial complex? Well, there's also the sex industrial complex. I suggest you read a book called Sexual Sabatoge by Dr. Judith Reisman and watch a documentary on here called the Kinsey Syndrome.
Take the recent proposition 8 mess. The gay activists behaved deplorably and apparently taking a political stance is valid reason to destroy someone by trying to stop them getting business or to stop them from having a job.
What I think is really disgusting is the whole lack of respect for anyone that has a different opinion then themselves. Everyone has to accept their position......or else they just shut stuff down by overcrowding....? Hopefully people realize how oppresive these gay rights activists are.
The mindset is easy to observe if you study them long enough. They come to their political views through childish assumptions of what is caring and good, to discriminate is bad and thus people who differ must know these things, know they are absolutely correct way to think, and to then decide to act against them. Therefore the radical collectivist assumes that the person who disagrees with them does so because of base selfish desires or through evil intentions.
That is why they can act like they do, to shut down debate and win by any means is moral because their goals are so pure and good.. Also, observe the way that they counter the intellectual arguments of individualists. By labelling them with terms such sexist, racist, homophobe, xenophobe, etc.
This is not a critique of the moderates on the left. There are some left positions that are respectable. I am talking about the radicals. To be a radical you really have to think that you are completely correct, morally superior and to hold your beliefs with a kind of religious fervour (that is to mean, faith based and dogmatic in nature).
Im with you on this Bernard. I think that sexual choices are largely a matter of nature but I so vehemently hate the screaming hysterical leftist bigots that I stand solely in Ryan Sorbas corner. Because we cant even get to the issues because they are suppressing the issues from being heard.
The problem is that this homosexual movement issue, its injustices & other similar issues are supported & stealthily promoted with subversive intentions by the darkest & greatest powers in the land. Otherwise, theres no way in which a mere 2% of a countries population, being so deviantly opposed to nature itself, can possibly obtain & wield this level of power. Especially within a country in which self governing & the democratic process are constituted. That being the authoritarian elites target
Wow, that's the longest time I've ever heard you hold the 1st syllable of "wandering" when you say your slogan "A wandering cauldron..."! Thanks for yet another enlightening episode.
So if the internet is really only our last bulkward against total control, we should all be packing our dacks for the new plans for regulated internet, world wide. Its in the works, and its in the news, look it up folks! When the net goes, we lose the only thing has kept our views alive and allowed them to grow. I think its then that radicalism, on all sides will grow tremendously, and will we be forced into the arms of the only group that will accept us?
If it werent for channels like this one, and the internet in general, many of us would be unable to express ourselves freely. If you constantly exclude a group they will run into the arms of whoever will accept them and their views, increasingly that is only radical white supremicist groups, or outspoken religious organisations. I think that if it werent for the free and anonomous nature of the interenet, we would all be in a very volatile position.
Although I could be wrong about this entirely. I mean this group is priviledge, that and they are the hight of chic, homosexual women. Yet they are the ones resoughting to mob rule and cowardly tactics that are born from the pack mentality. It only seems to me that as the dominant group, and his views are pushed out of every mainstream or alternative group, he will naturally go to the only people who will accept him and his opinions.
The gay mafia has pulled stunts like this again and again. Don't any of these hateful groups; gay activist, feminists, ect, fear that one day that hatred and anger of the opposing side will bubble and spill over into uncontrolled rage. Hate to use race, gender, or sexual specific terminology here, but the average white, hetersexual male here is being put in a tremendously difficult and persecuted position.
I saw a utube video of some republicans protesting Obama. They were quite peaceful until the pro-obama people showed up and demanded that the police take them away. I was really shocked when a legal and peaceful protest was actually stopped by the police despite the fact there was no law broken. It kind of reminded me of NAZI germany where anyone who stood against Hittler was taken away by the government.
I had to deal with these broads once arguing with them. They were all up in a fuss about some guys' Halloween costume because he was a blackface Bobby Brown with his girlfriend as Whitney in blackface also. They're just nutty radical liberals. I thought they made a mountain out of a mole hill (common of the radical left) and they tried to incite racial tension when there was none to begin with.
Do you think its possible that this kind of militant suppresion of free ideas on the submissive majority will result in only more cowardice? I only wonder that if this kind of pathetic activism only breeds hatred of women, lesbians, leftists. Maybe I'm only projecting. But it would seem logical to me to assume that there comes a point, when the majority ie, white, heterosexual males releases there mass frustration in acts of mob rule, like the Crunulla riots in Sydney.
Political correct movement is about hiding the hate-mongering and criminality that goes on behind the scenes. If they look and superficially behave in a "politically correct" manner nobody can accuse them hate-mongering and criminality that they are really doing behind the scenes.
dutytocareforothers 8 months ago
After the police state has been crushed under the weight of its own creation and society has collapsed, a new society with far fewer restrictions will emerge.
I would propose that in this society freedom of speech should come with a right to demarcate an area in which intentional distruptors would be smacked upside the head with a baseball bat or some similar appliance.
This would leave certain individuals with only themselves to blame for any injuries incurred.
Yourebuying 8 months ago
I'd love for some pile of shit to try that with me.
I'd open their head like a tin of baked beans.
Yourebuying 8 months ago
There's no such thing as hate speech. It's just used as an excuse to censor somthing you dont like without seeming like a hypocrite when you say you believe in freedom of speech. Also, having an alternative explanation for what causes homosexuality does not mean you hate gay people. You can say gays aren't born gay while still promoting their freedom to practice gay sex.
leecfb000 1 year ago 3
@leecfb000 I agree with 100 percent. Excellent analysis.
pinegrove33 1 year ago 2
Comment removed
laufantastica 1 year ago
What's the best video of Sorba's speech and the protest?
RichKnight2010 1 year ago
We need more freedom of speech on our college campuses!
JasonDamisch 1 year ago
their behavior is deplorable keep up the good work exposing their lawless behavior.
tonykeywest07 1 year ago
these dykes expose themselves as lawless brutes without self control or honor.
tonykeywest07 1 year ago
Should have sent KEVIN sorbo instead..could have eprecipitated a fight with ZENA,though...
mrbriscoe2001 2 years ago
Well done, Pinegrove33. You seem to have unusually good insight on the Leftist/degenerate/'Orcs' problem.
ProNorden 2 years ago
aha as if all people who protested were lesbians, and why do you all keep bring this up? this happened like a year ago.
tchock 2 years ago
I bring it up because it's an affront to justice and truth. I would bring it up if it occurred 50 years ago. Obviously, that's not even an argument though. We must fight leftist totalitarianism regardless of who advocates for it. Yes, most of the people protesting were lesbians. Yet why anyone would act is such a manner is beyond reckoning. Why don't you try respecting diversity?
pinegrove33 2 years ago
fine, i can see why you bring it up. however, you obviously don't know the facts regarding this protest and are saying really ridiculous things that you don't actually know are true or not.
fact: most of the protesters were not lesbians.
tchock 2 years ago
Here's what his book said: "A little over one‐hundred and fifty years ago, the first concept of an inborn homosexual condition began to circulate in Germany. Prior to this time there is no known record of any human being ever claiming to have been born with
same‐sex attractions (SSA)". Here's your lie: "there have been homosexuals for longer than 150 years." Anyone who reads this can now see that you are a complete and sick liar, lol. Again, there's no hate in his position.
pinegrove33 2 years ago
you mistunderstood AGAIN. i was pointing out your misuse of the phrase "lesbian activists" because they were just activists in general. you dont have to be gay to stand up for gays. thats called common sense, dear baldy.
also, due to the fact that you state "i didnt even know who ryan sorba was until i saw the videos"... you have never read his book, and thus do not know whether it does contain hate speech or not.
OWNEEDDDDD
fazzaq 2 years ago
No, I got to read the pdf the link of which is available for all those who see this video in the comments bar. Its worth reading. You have asserted that it is hate speech. Why is it hate speech. Everyone who reads this: please feel free to argue and refute the lesbian intolerance machine. They can't think they're way out of a paper bag. Why is thinking people aren't born gay hate speech? It isn't.
Anyone who's a lesbian activist and not gay is an absurdity. OWNEEEEDDDD, pig.
pinegrove33 2 years ago
You're not going to insult me on my channel. Thinking that gays are not born gay is not an act of hate. It is not akin to slavery or Jim Crow. I'll give you another chance to think and argue. Why is Mr. Sorba thinking that gays are not born gay hate speech? Please explain.
pinegrove33 2 years ago
here we go baldy,
to deny a group of people legitimacy is HATE. ryan sorba attempted to strip the gay community of their legitimacy by denying their history (the history he present was inaccurate...there have been homosexuals for longer than 150 years. da vinci was a homo), and by infering that homosexuality is not natural.
I'm not sure if you are familiar with the holocaust, but that was the basis of Nazism. to deny a group of people their legitimacy as a means of erasing them.
OWNED!
fazzaq 2 years ago
He doesn't deny anyone legitimacy. Saying I wasn't born a writer doesn't deny the legitimacy of my being a writer now. He never said that in his book that homosexuals have only been around for 150 years. What page is that on? Oh, that's right you're making it up. He's entitled to his views and you're entitled to yours. You and the rest of your hysterical horde should refute his positions with logic. This has nothing to do with the holocaust. Okay, he made his argument, are gays now erased?
pinegrove33 2 years ago 2
ITS ON THE FIRST PAGE GENIUS.
shows how well you read this "book"
fazzaq 2 years ago
Comment removed
fazzaq 2 years ago
hey baldy, more than half of those "lesbian activists" were NOT actually gay. just good people shutting down hate speech. get your facts straight before you start preaching
fazzaq 2 years ago
hey pig, lesbian activists not being gay is absurd. Furthermore, you should give diversity a try. There was no hate speech in Sorba's book. It's perfectly fine for someone to disagree with you. He thinks people are not born gay. What you should do is come up with arguments to refute him rather than shout him down. Only cowards shut others down...you weak brainwashed loser.
pinegrove33 2 years ago 2
Why would straight people back lesbian fascists unless they were brainwashed freaks?
pinegrove33 2 years ago
I don't agree with the Smith student reaction, but do you honestly think hate-speech like this should be condoned through allowing ryan sorba to continue?
college288 2 years ago
No, Sorba made zero in the way of hate speech. He just thinks people are not born gay. There's nothing hateful about that. Personally I disagree with him but you should try respecting his diversity.
pinegrove33 2 years ago
I'm surprised Smith college even allows a Republican's club...
Iluvanonymous 2 years ago
Congrats on placing number 6 on the google search for Smith College. Hopefully it makes them uncomfortable.
johnhladun 3 years ago
I would bring suit to them for violating my right to free assembly, if I were him. I would say to the officer that one can not be ordered to stop speaking at a peaceful assembly.
mattcg90 3 years ago
P.C. is THE WORST. So detrimental to the progression of society and the human race in general. One day of media void of P.C. would be insanely potent to the thoughtless masses, as it's the media that shapes so many facets of us and our lives, whether we know it or not.
regresseur 3 years ago
The attraction to a particular morphology IS controlled by genes. The reason almost all Men are attracted to the hourglass and Women to the V shape is due to our genetic makeup. But it's a sliding scale.
My background in molecular biology gives me a solid basis for this opinion but, that being said, I would actively protest what happened at that meeting. Silencing opposition through violence and intimidation is ALWAYS wrong.
The worst human rights offender in this case is the University.
sirskeptic 3 years ago 3
@sirskeptic Sliding scale? You haven't been bought and sold on Kinsey's junk/fraud science, have you?
funk7000 1 year ago
@funk7000 Actually, Kinsey never came up in all my years of science. My opinion was based on the molecular evidence of the last 15 years.
Why? Did he say the same thing?
Any why do you think it is fraud?
sirskeptic 1 year ago
@sirskeptic Well first, he was heavily funded by the Rockefellers (they're into eugenics and depopulation) and Kinsey'd methodology was bias and criminal. You may g=have heard of the military industrial complex? Well, there's also the sex industrial complex. I suggest you read a book called Sexual Sabatoge by Dr. Judith Reisman and watch a documentary on here called the Kinsey Syndrome.
funk7000 1 year ago
@funk7000 - Exactly what I was thinking. The sliding scale concept is absurd.
leecfb000 9 months ago
I think holding the mic while pointing and laughing would be a good strategy to illicit a violent response.
Hogbeast6 3 years ago
Take the recent proposition 8 mess. The gay activists behaved deplorably and apparently taking a political stance is valid reason to destroy someone by trying to stop them getting business or to stop them from having a job.
ArgusEyes 3 years ago 2
What I think is really disgusting is the whole lack of respect for anyone that has a different opinion then themselves. Everyone has to accept their position......or else they just shut stuff down by overcrowding....? Hopefully people realize how oppresive these gay rights activists are.
Parley454 3 years ago 2
The mindset is easy to observe if you study them long enough. They come to their political views through childish assumptions of what is caring and good, to discriminate is bad and thus people who differ must know these things, know they are absolutely correct way to think, and to then decide to act against them. Therefore the radical collectivist assumes that the person who disagrees with them does so because of base selfish desires or through evil intentions.
ArgusEyes 3 years ago 6
That is why they can act like they do, to shut down debate and win by any means is moral because their goals are so pure and good.. Also, observe the way that they counter the intellectual arguments of individualists. By labelling them with terms such sexist, racist, homophobe, xenophobe, etc.
ArgusEyes 3 years ago 4
This is not a critique of the moderates on the left. There are some left positions that are respectable. I am talking about the radicals. To be a radical you really have to think that you are completely correct, morally superior and to hold your beliefs with a kind of religious fervour (that is to mean, faith based and dogmatic in nature).
ArgusEyes 3 years ago 3
Im with you on this Bernard. I think that sexual choices are largely a matter of nature but I so vehemently hate the screaming hysterical leftist bigots that I stand solely in Ryan Sorbas corner. Because we cant even get to the issues because they are suppressing the issues from being heard.
ArgusEyes 3 years ago 4
The problem is that this homosexual movement issue, its injustices & other similar issues are supported & stealthily promoted with subversive intentions by the darkest & greatest powers in the land. Otherwise, theres no way in which a mere 2% of a countries population, being so deviantly opposed to nature itself, can possibly obtain & wield this level of power. Especially within a country in which self governing & the democratic process are constituted. That being the authoritarian elites target
Chuichupachichi 3 years ago 2
Wow, that's the longest time I've ever heard you hold the 1st syllable of "wandering" when you say your slogan "A wandering cauldron..."! Thanks for yet another enlightening episode.
CCRoxtar 3 years ago
So if the internet is really only our last bulkward against total control, we should all be packing our dacks for the new plans for regulated internet, world wide. Its in the works, and its in the news, look it up folks! When the net goes, we lose the only thing has kept our views alive and allowed them to grow. I think its then that radicalism, on all sides will grow tremendously, and will we be forced into the arms of the only group that will accept us?
heyyoubeindthebushes 3 years ago
If it werent for channels like this one, and the internet in general, many of us would be unable to express ourselves freely. If you constantly exclude a group they will run into the arms of whoever will accept them and their views, increasingly that is only radical white supremicist groups, or outspoken religious organisations. I think that if it werent for the free and anonomous nature of the interenet, we would all be in a very volatile position.
heyyoubeindthebushes 3 years ago 2
Although I could be wrong about this entirely. I mean this group is priviledge, that and they are the hight of chic, homosexual women. Yet they are the ones resoughting to mob rule and cowardly tactics that are born from the pack mentality. It only seems to me that as the dominant group, and his views are pushed out of every mainstream or alternative group, he will naturally go to the only people who will accept him and his opinions.
heyyoubeindthebushes 3 years ago
The gay mafia has pulled stunts like this again and again. Don't any of these hateful groups; gay activist, feminists, ect, fear that one day that hatred and anger of the opposing side will bubble and spill over into uncontrolled rage. Hate to use race, gender, or sexual specific terminology here, but the average white, hetersexual male here is being put in a tremendously difficult and persecuted position.
heyyoubeindthebushes 3 years ago
I saw a utube video of some republicans protesting Obama. They were quite peaceful until the pro-obama people showed up and demanded that the police take them away. I was really shocked when a legal and peaceful protest was actually stopped by the police despite the fact there was no law broken. It kind of reminded me of NAZI germany where anyone who stood against Hittler was taken away by the government.
timbosforporn 3 years ago
I had to deal with these broads once arguing with them. They were all up in a fuss about some guys' Halloween costume because he was a blackface Bobby Brown with his girlfriend as Whitney in blackface also. They're just nutty radical liberals. I thought they made a mountain out of a mole hill (common of the radical left) and they tried to incite racial tension when there was none to begin with.
printo69 3 years ago
Do you think its possible that this kind of militant suppresion of free ideas on the submissive majority will result in only more cowardice? I only wonder that if this kind of pathetic activism only breeds hatred of women, lesbians, leftists. Maybe I'm only projecting. But it would seem logical to me to assume that there comes a point, when the majority ie, white, heterosexual males releases there mass frustration in acts of mob rule, like the Crunulla riots in Sydney.
heyyoubeindthebushes 3 years ago