This is the single worst cover I have ever heard. I is absolutley HORRIBLE. There is no way to defend it. First time I thought it was taking the piss out of the song, then I realised it was serious. This cover DOES NOT capture ANY of the original awesomeness, even at atomic level, it is a SHIT cover, John Lennon would have laughed at it. The original is a one-off masterpiece, that cannot be created, especially not by shit such as "the breeders". Any one who likes it must be fucking retarded
@CARASSAR I prefer this one to the original because it suits my personal tastes. And I'm not "Fucking Retarded." Your opinion is yours, don't use it to belittle others.
@CARASSAR John Lennon would have disapproved of your entire comment. He, being a reasonable person, would say "To each their own." Not "you're fucking retarded.". And I truly doubt he would call one of his own songs a masterpiece, he's not self-centered or judgemental. So please, rethink your statement.
Even though I prefer the way the Beatles sung this, I find this version more satisfying because it climaxes at the "mother superior jumped the gun" part which I always thought was the best part of the song.
The way Tanya comes in with the "happiness is a warm gun" and Kim responds with a bored "bang bang shoot shoot" kills me. I like this version better than the original. The Beatles were great, yeah, but they were never this dynamic.
I dont like it, breeders destroys this song, the original is the best and one of my favorite beatles song, no good drums in the first part and no climax in the end part?, this sucks!!
I like the harder feel of this version. I love the part right before they say "i need a fix cuz im goin down". but both are amazing versions and which i listen to depends on my mood.
THEY BOTH SUCK! haha just kiddin, this version is more in the style of the breeders, as the original sounds more like the style of the beatles..wait a minute..maybe..that's because THIS is the fuckin BREEDERS..and the original is the fuckin BEATLES...? nooo, it makes more sense to argue about which one's better because one of you keyboard warriors decide one's better than the other and somehow stamping better on it with their magical music stamp handed to them by god..
I'm a huge Beatles fan. Nothing can compare to John; I get it. I love the original. That's why I like this version, it's unique, especially hearing a female interpretation. Try opening your mind to something different.
I can't believe that there is a shitload of comments saying that this is a bad cover. I think that is the problem with major artists, they have such a big amount of fans, that most of them are idiots who don't understand the music anyways...
And saying which version is better is stupid, since its all about personal taste.
EXCELLENT cover. And very fitting that it was sung by Kim. I love this Breeders song. It's one of my favorites. And at the end, old Josephine is barely audible in the back ground..."bang bang shoot shoot."
JOHN LENNON JOHN LENNON JOHN LENNON=== PIXIES====BREEDERS====LENNONS WHITE ALBUM tracks inspire frank/kim-- dear prudence,
happyness is a warm gun,
im so tired, julia, the contin..story of bungalobill,everybodys got something to hide, cold turkey,dig a pony, accross the universe,glass onion,hey bulldog,revolution,yer blues,sexy sadie, cry baby cry, polythene pam, ......you can hear frank n kim have been thru these with a fine tooth comb
I'm a huge Beatles fan but I'm an even huger Breeders fan and this version is far superior to the Beatles version.
The Breeders actually succeeded in making the tone of the music match the content of the lyrics, unlike the Beatles. And Kim Deal has the sexiest voice in rock.
@oneofmanykinseys Sucked in my dear sucked in.Though it is true to say that the Beatles are sometimes over venerated.And regardles this IS agreat rendition of a great song.
@oneofmanykinseys Also would you mind if we postulated that you were a woman in your twenties from a westerly part of Europe .Its merely data we collate for the increased accuracy of future surveys.Thanking you kindly in advance
So, usually I loathe every single Beatle cover, I just really really love this one. It's really really great.
It's definitely not like the original, but it's like she kept in mind what's great about the song, and just had it come through her. I like it. And I'm fucking serious, it take something spectacular not to piss me the fuck off.
@64fairlane305 While I like the original, this is far from "pathetic". There are bad covers out there for sure, this is not one of them. :D If anything, it bores me because it's too close to the original. *shrug
if you talk shit about this cover is because you dont know the breeders. this version is perfect, not because you know everything about the beetles meas youre entitled to be right about wether this is a good cover or not. i would not change a thing about it. i find that the original is cheesy as fuck anyways
I don't think she's trying to "make it her own" at all, as far as covers go I'd say she did a decent job.. but she is the only singer, and a female, so its obviously going to be distinctly different, she can't fake an accent and pass off as john lennon..
I love this song as much as the original because the breeders did mimic the beatles, they played this three part song in an original way that gives it the unique character that draws many people into the song, plus kims raw singing style
I don't think she's the only singer ; my guess has always been that the voice repeating "Happiness is a warm gun at the end was Tanya Donelly's. Anyone to confirm/infirm ?
gotta love people who want carbon copy covers. what the hell is the point of that? this is a great cover of a great song by a great band. get over it. the beatles are not untouchable
@groverCotman beatles are good. but not untouchable. they have been over hyped over the years mainly due to nostalgia for the past. Comparing a real version to a cover is a pointless exercise anyway.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
@dirtbag1713 The point of a cover is to re-create the beauty. With songs like this it is impossible to do such a thing, therefore it falls short and is seen as inferior. That's the point. Not a reinterpretation of what some stupid artist "THINKS" the song may be about or portraying. This song was originally banned by the BBC because they thought THEY knew wtf the song was talking about. Negative. Fail again. And again. Understand yet?
@UNSUNGBAND pretty weak cop-out...when I read your "retorts" the word that comes to mind isn't witty, it's pity...maybe you should keep your opinion as unsung as your band
You are an unbelievable moron. You are fired from the internet for being a moron (and they let the KKK stay so you must be a special grade of imbecile) please collect your belongings and exit. You are not to come with 100 yards of anybody with a computer or you will be copied and pasted to 10 other videos and a Japanese girl with glowing eyes will outsmart you in the game of life.
@UNSUNGBAND whts with all the hate on you? I actually agree with you if your point is that it would be impossible to cover this song and not fall short. Like its "Happiness is a warm Gun" by the Beatles, which is easily one of the best and most perfect songs ever composed. Truly great covers are measured so by their ability to surpass the originals like Jimi's "All Along the Watchtower", Santana's "Black Magic Woman", or Creams "Crossroads".
@shamwoww I agree with your main point of what you said. that covers are not meant to be identical to the original. And I am sure John would have said he likes it and is honored they covered his song.
@Thinkfirst99 Right ON!Mother Superior would have 'dug' it...and anyhow a'cover' is a piece of cloth that 'changes the form' of whatever's underneath - it ain't meant to be 'musical cloning' -true???!creashonrebel
@TheSammaslamma umm did u read my comment, I clearly said Hendrix's is the cover. also wouldnt take offense cause nowadays I probably listen to Bob Dylan more than Jimi so I hear the original song alot. Its obviously a masterpiece, and somehow we've been even further blessed by Hendrix coming along and breathtakingly reimagining the song. oh and im not your buddy :D
@UNSUNGBAND But I do think this cover does capture the original spirit of the song, of course the band still leaves their unique touch, but all in all a good cover in my opinion.
bah screw all the haters, this is as fine a cover as ever there was!
The Beatles' version is one of their best songs and as far as I'm concerned it's done justice here. They made it their own all the while keeping it an homage to the original.
woah stalin slow down there your opinion isn't fact and should not be treated as such, personaly I like this version much more mainly because I am not much of a Beatles fan but love the Pixies and the Breeders, honestly I can't see why this cover is getting such bad critisism it is a great alternative rock twist on the song.
i think i am entitled to my opinion and my opinion is that this version sucks, i know everyone doesn't get the beatles, that's cool, i personally don't care for this version although i like other breeders songs and other beatles covers
well well..you know.I first heard this song in this version.and it took me a while to warm up to the original when I started listening to the beatles years later...I really love this version..
I don't understand why people put thumbs down on this. It's the truth--the Beatles version is superior. But that's not to say this version isn't great.
people had put thumbs down on your comment, and i was wondering why because the Beatles version is a lot better than this but that this version is good, too.
This version is great.Its really different from the original but that was on purpose.
This is one of their few covers,And Kim deal is a great songwriter.Maybe you should listen to their songs before you say they wish they could write a song like this.
to each their own. has nothing to do with intelligence. god damn people get over yourselves and stop trolling.
MentalRecluse 2 weeks ago
An estimable cover but who speaks at the tail end and what do they say?
lyonslaforet 1 month ago
This is the single worst cover I have ever heard. I is absolutley HORRIBLE. There is no way to defend it. First time I thought it was taking the piss out of the song, then I realised it was serious. This cover DOES NOT capture ANY of the original awesomeness, even at atomic level, it is a SHIT cover, John Lennon would have laughed at it. The original is a one-off masterpiece, that cannot be created, especially not by shit such as "the breeders". Any one who likes it must be fucking retarded
CARASSAR 1 month ago
@CARASSAR I prefer this one to the original because it suits my personal tastes. And I'm not "Fucking Retarded." Your opinion is yours, don't use it to belittle others.
Donyaeshurn 2 weeks ago
@Donyaeshurn What's that you say you "prefer this to the original?" yep your fucking retarded.
slyguy4thewin 2 weeks ago
@slyguy4thewin Bahaha. Okay.
Donyaeshurn 2 weeks ago
@CARASSAR John Lennon would have disapproved of your entire comment. He, being a reasonable person, would say "To each their own." Not "you're fucking retarded.". And I truly doubt he would call one of his own songs a masterpiece, he's not self-centered or judgemental. So please, rethink your statement.
chanman25252 1 day ago
lyrics should read: "I need a fix 'cause I'm goin' down down to the bits that I left uptown..."
bits of heroin I presume ;)
jlleblanc 1 month ago
one of my favorite beatles songs...and its not a bad covor.........love the pixes as well
MrSoullicker 1 month ago
Woo, yogpod!
EIG2011 2 months ago
O.O
miniraptorX 3 months ago
Even though I prefer the way the Beatles sung this, I find this version more satisfying because it climaxes at the "mother superior jumped the gun" part which I always thought was the best part of the song.
xXPinkGoddessXx 3 months ago
At first i thought that was a picture of a Bannana half pilled but now idk...
MrAvoid7 4 months ago
Just overall. It is not something Beatles really did, get really quiet and really loud on the same song.
mbvglider 4 months ago
@mbvglider
Helter Skelter?
theonlymob 4 months ago
@theonlymob That song never gets quiet.
mbvglider 4 months ago
The way Tanya comes in with the "happiness is a warm gun" and Kim responds with a bored "bang bang shoot shoot" kills me. I like this version better than the original. The Beatles were great, yeah, but they were never this dynamic.
mbvglider 5 months ago
@mbvglider are you joking? or do you mean with the overall sounds itself?
nickpetrillo100 4 months ago
For fucks sake,they covered it.it happened.get over it. it's not bad. and seriously people,the Beatles were awesome but they're not fucking gods.
ThatReeferSmokinMan 5 months ago 2
@ThatReeferSmokinMan Na, they were fucking gods. But this is still a kick ass cover
jenacious7 4 months ago 3
I actually really like this!
HypocriticalNarwhal 5 months ago
this song is so pretty
alotofcheese76 6 months ago
orgasm
ashleystewart34 6 months ago
Comment removed
ramplestunkskin 7 months ago
wow gabiotta, you're so angry now!
oneadbekunkus 7 months ago
This is the best cover of this song.
thatgreengirl12 8 months ago
A soap impression of his wife*
The bits that I left uptown*
Excellent cover.
Right up there with Joe Cocker. xD
Vaskiznatchdooch 8 months ago
I hate nearly every beatles cover i hear. You don't fuck with the beatles.
...this however is an exception. Goddamnit kim.
BeGrunge 8 months ago 5
this is the cover for a beatles song,correct?
RetardedKidzTV 9 months ago
@RetardedKidzTV
Yeah. The original was on the Beatle's White Album.
TheTinker19 9 months ago
@RetardedKidzTV yeah :)
lipstickterrors 7 months ago
iove the original...this is EXCELLENT......
no bad feedback from me
invectrum 9 months ago 5
Comment removed
invectrum 9 months ago
This was better then Last Splash.
LORDGOAT1976 10 months ago
Thanks for posting this, Right the fuck on!!!! <3
Agdollproductions18 10 months ago
I dont like it, breeders destroys this song, the original is the best and one of my favorite beatles song, no good drums in the first part and no climax in the end part?, this sucks!!
123456789abcdefghij 10 months ago
@123456789abcdefghij I agree. Why cover something if you're going to get rid of the best parts?
1980Fraser 10 months ago
No video?
Gleis68 10 months ago
Wow! Feels so different from the original!
neonspec 10 months ago
Oh god. Ive just climaxed at the bridge.
kylelikesducks 11 months ago
3:30 in the morning drunk i just got some sick visuals from this one :- ]
cvframer 11 months ago
wicked.
dipmuthafukinset 1 year ago
I´ve got a demotape with them from 1993... Anyone?
BittePersson 1 year ago
@BittePersson If you're talking about the Pod Demos, you can get it on their website for free now.
strylowskia90 1 year ago
This album is nearly old enough to buy beer. Damn.
deussolinvictus 1 year ago 49
@deussolinvictus lol i like the way you put that
ranmore30 1 year ago
@deussolinvictus no it's 2 years older than old enough to buy beer (made in 1990)
runawaywithmarilyn 7 months ago
@deussolinvictus In which state?
Sprongo 7 months ago
@deussolinvictus I am 13 months older then the Deal sisters. I feel you man.
WhiteKagu 6 months ago
The way they did the last part makes me wanna cry =/
SoaringMuse 1 year ago
sometimes I Love how Steve Albini albums sound. this is one of those times...
0ntheWaydown 1 year ago 3
@0ntheWaydown yea same with surfa rosa and in utero
edisdead1 11 months ago
I like the harder feel of this version. I love the part right before they say "i need a fix cuz im goin down". but both are amazing versions and which i listen to depends on my mood.
jB0UCH 1 year ago
mmm, car smokes 2 this. showing 1's age indeed.
MrDubery 1 year ago
shite
anycolouryouwant 1 year ago
0.o never heard this cover before. i love it!
moveitninja 1 year ago
THEY BOTH SUCK! haha just kiddin, this version is more in the style of the breeders, as the original sounds more like the style of the beatles..wait a minute..maybe..that's because THIS is the fuckin BREEDERS..and the original is the fuckin BEATLES...? nooo, it makes more sense to argue about which one's better because one of you keyboard warriors decide one's better than the other and somehow stamping better on it with their magical music stamp handed to them by god..
IAmRonaldMcRaygun 1 year ago
I'm a huge Beatles fan. Nothing can compare to John; I get it. I love the original. That's why I like this version, it's unique, especially hearing a female interpretation. Try opening your mind to something different.
mrshiggs1 1 year ago 5
covers=same notes,same lyrics,transform it in to the band's style
panchomanygonzoman 1 year ago
I can't believe that there is a shitload of comments saying that this is a bad cover. I think that is the problem with major artists, they have such a big amount of fans, that most of them are idiots who don't understand the music anyways...
And saying which version is better is stupid, since its all about personal taste.
1darkk1 1 year ago
EXCELLENT cover. And very fitting that it was sung by Kim. I love this Breeders song. It's one of my favorites. And at the end, old Josephine is barely audible in the back ground..."bang bang shoot shoot."
welbymd 1 year ago
Comment removed
snackcakey 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@welbymd it sounds like kim is saying "bang bang shoot shoot" while tanya donelly is singing the title.
snackcakey 1 year ago
Amazing cover!!!
The breeders & the beatles : two passions!
IzanagiSMT 1 year ago
This is better than the original to me. Period.
deussolinvictus 1 year ago
JOHN LENNON JOHN LENNON JOHN LENNON=== PIXIES====BREEDERS====LENNONS WHITE ALBUM tracks inspire frank/kim-- dear prudence,
happyness is a warm gun,
im so tired, julia, the contin..story of bungalobill,everybodys got something to hide, cold turkey,dig a pony, accross the universe,glass onion,hey bulldog,revolution,yer blues,sexy sadie, cry baby cry, polythene pam, ......you can hear frank n kim have been thru these with a fine tooth comb
sunriseRISE 1 year ago
This is fucking dirt. Absolute dirt.
oneofmanykinseys 1 year ago
@oneofmanykinseys go jerk McCartney off
jesuhead1974 1 year ago
@jesuhead1974
You're a wanker
groverCotman 1 year ago
@oneofmanykinseys
This is a better version of the song. (period).
scott4fire 1 year ago
I'm a huge Beatles fan but I'm an even huger Breeders fan and this version is far superior to the Beatles version.
The Breeders actually succeeded in making the tone of the music match the content of the lyrics, unlike the Beatles. And Kim Deal has the sexiest voice in rock.
kiwifaraway 1 year ago
The Beatles are shit ,its official I just asked a multi national audience with a broad age range and everyone said they were
MrFlatmint 1 year ago
Comment removed
oneofmanykinseys 1 year ago
@MrFlatmint You fucking eejit. I won't even ask you how you conducted your survey because you are, quite clearly, a fucking idiot.
oneofmanykinseys 1 year ago
@oneofmanykinseys Sucked in my dear sucked in.Though it is true to say that the Beatles are sometimes over venerated.And regardles this IS agreat rendition of a great song.
MrFlatmint 1 year ago
@oneofmanykinseys Also would you mind if we postulated that you were a woman in your twenties from a westerly part of Europe .Its merely data we collate for the increased accuracy of future surveys.Thanking you kindly in advance
MrFlatmint 1 year ago
@oneofmanykinseys
Ditto!!
groverCotman 1 year ago
I wish it was longerrr
dumd1ddly 1 year ago 3
i like this just as much as the original
naiammusic 1 year ago
So, usually I loathe every single Beatle cover, I just really really love this one. It's really really great.
It's definitely not like the original, but it's like she kept in mind what's great about the song, and just had it come through her. I like it. And I'm fucking serious, it take something spectacular not to piss me the fuck off.
Well done, darlings.
devaom420 1 year ago 2
dont sound like singing..sounds more like speaking. ..
storyofnicole 1 year ago
@storyofnicole she's hitting tones with her voice. that's not speaking. and if she was speaking, it would be awesome too.
roejogan8 1 year ago 3
btw, it's soap impression not sole confession.
charlieenders 1 year ago
i like this version better
davekat 1 year ago
this cover is still pretty cool a different twist I respect that.
90zosoman09 1 year ago
Nobody likes carbon copies, but it doesn't have the strength or clarity as the original to make me come back for more. Piss poor shitty cover.
vaughn2sexy4uyo 1 year ago
@vaughn2sexy4uyo sounds pretty powerful to me. and clarity? who gives a fuck. some people like a bit of dirt in their music.
roejogan8 1 year ago 3
Hmmmmm the Beatles meet the Breeders (partly the Pixies)......
So does that mean:
This Monkey's gone to heaven, B'c Mother Superior jumped the gun?!!!!
dabidosan 1 year ago
Covers are always polemic, I like the risk that implies taking a classic and see it under a new angle. Peace
wackbzn 1 year ago
is she from pixies?
zorgono 1 year ago 3
yes, <3
blink182python 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
oh please, give me the original, this is pathetic
64fairlane305 1 year ago
@64fairlane305 While I like the original, this is far from "pathetic". There are bad covers out there for sure, this is not one of them. :D If anything, it bores me because it's too close to the original. *shrug
jutywero 1 year ago
amazing :|
plucknslap 1 year ago
if you talk shit about this cover is because you dont know the breeders. this version is perfect, not because you know everything about the beetles meas youre entitled to be right about wether this is a good cover or not. i would not change a thing about it. i find that the original is cheesy as fuck anyways
rayolacer 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
im sorry but this is shit lol
puddingfoot 1 year ago
this cover owns the original ... fullstop
dustinzk 1 year ago 3
I don't think she's trying to "make it her own" at all, as far as covers go I'd say she did a decent job.. but she is the only singer, and a female, so its obviously going to be distinctly different, she can't fake an accent and pass off as john lennon..
I love this song as much as the original because the breeders did mimic the beatles, they played this three part song in an original way that gives it the unique character that draws many people into the song, plus kims raw singing style
blink182python 1 year ago
@blink182python
I don't think she's the only singer ; my guess has always been that the voice repeating "Happiness is a warm gun at the end was Tanya Donelly's. Anyone to confirm/infirm ?
Ant57fr 1 year ago
@Ant57fr Yeah. Just watch any live video - they switch off vocals.
exaltedone 1 year ago
luv the Breeders but you can't take a Beatles song and "make it your own"
Ceyx66 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
CRAP
drdotislovinlife 2 years ago
CRAP comment
spacewurm 1 year ago 4
I agree completely lacks the strengths of the original.
jimweird 2 years ago
The Beatles will live on forever.
RocketROCKET1234 2 years ago 6
wtf man
DagbjortJohannesd 2 years ago
evry breath you take
is a thunder day
joyseedk 2 years ago
i think the cover fit perfectly into an excellent album- had it been interpreted as the original, I don't think it would have worked
neurotj 2 years ago 23
this is awesome
LENWOIS 2 years ago
This cover has a distinct feeling, I like it
MikauBodom 2 years ago 5
This has been flagged as spam show
so in love with this song
morganfromsc 2 years ago 2
I like Kim Deal and all, but this version honestly lacks everything that was great about the original.
GrungeRock1991 2 years ago
One of the best version that I ever heard.
toadpunk 2 years ago 7
Top album..i remember it in a haze.
bulletstospare 2 years ago
Nice
noogies 2 years ago 3
overall, this version is better than the beatles original. not surprising.
senorfarqueso 2 years ago
Fuck all of you this is awesome!!
yiommi 2 years ago 3
gotta love people who want carbon copy covers. what the hell is the point of that? this is a great cover of a great song by a great band. get over it. the beatles are not untouchable
dirtbag1713 2 years ago 54
@dirtbag1713 mcartney even said he preferred jimi hendrix's version of seargent pepper.
hendrixphish420 1 year ago
@dirtbag1713 and also aye, i agree, its better when a band takes a song and makes a VERSION, not a cover :P
as in they take it and make it their own! which was done here
hendrixphish420 1 year ago
@dirtbag1713 fuck you they're not you don't have much of a fucking ear for music if this is your idea of a great cover get fucked!!!
The519method 1 year ago
@The519method I'm sure John ,Paul ,George and Ringo agree totally with your opinion man
MrFlatmint 1 year ago
@dirtbag1713 How can you even equate this to the Beatles Version. Not even in the same galaxy dude. Dream on
groverCotman 1 year ago
@groverCotman beatles are good. but not untouchable. they have been over hyped over the years mainly due to nostalgia for the past. Comparing a real version to a cover is a pointless exercise anyway.
qwertyopo1234 1 year ago
@groverCotman Agree with you.
kerova2705 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@dirtbag1713 The point of a cover is to re-create the beauty. With songs like this it is impossible to do such a thing, therefore it falls short and is seen as inferior. That's the point. Not a reinterpretation of what some stupid artist "THINKS" the song may be about or portraying. This song was originally banned by the BBC because they thought THEY knew wtf the song was talking about. Negative. Fail again. And again. Understand yet?
UNSUNGBAND 9 months ago
@UNSUNGBAND people like you and your interpretations of this world suck
crackpipeization 9 months ago 6
@crackpipeization Your name says enough. Thanks for saving me from wasting another witty retort!
UNSUNGBAND 9 months ago
@UNSUNGBAND pretty weak cop-out...when I read your "retorts" the word that comes to mind isn't witty, it's pity...maybe you should keep your opinion as unsung as your band
crackpipeization 9 months ago 7
@crackpipeization [See above]
UNSUNGBAND 9 months ago
@UNSUNGBAND
You are an unbelievable moron. You are fired from the internet for being a moron (and they let the KKK stay so you must be a special grade of imbecile) please collect your belongings and exit. You are not to come with 100 yards of anybody with a computer or you will be copied and pasted to 10 other videos and a Japanese girl with glowing eyes will outsmart you in the game of life.
gabiotta 8 months ago 12
@gabiotta Bahahahaha thanks!! You made my day with your humorous psychobabble! :-)
UNSUNGBAND 8 months ago
Wankers can't handle criticism. Boo fucking hoo :)
UNSUNGBAND 8 months ago
@gabiotta LOLOLOLOLOL!!!!!!!
missLolaKatz 5 months ago
@UNSUNGBAND Wait, so you're for carbon-copies? What's the point in doing the exact same thing if there already is the original?
TitaniousGrubbs 9 months ago 3
@UNSUNGBAND whts with all the hate on you? I actually agree with you if your point is that it would be impossible to cover this song and not fall short. Like its "Happiness is a warm Gun" by the Beatles, which is easily one of the best and most perfect songs ever composed. Truly great covers are measured so by their ability to surpass the originals like Jimi's "All Along the Watchtower", Santana's "Black Magic Woman", or Creams "Crossroads".
shamwoww 6 months ago
@shamwoww I agree with your main point of what you said. that covers are not meant to be identical to the original. And I am sure John would have said he likes it and is honored they covered his song.
Thinkfirst99 6 months ago
@Thinkfirst99 absolutely, and how cool is it that we get to hear Happiness Is A Warm Gun, but sung by KIm Deal.
shamwoww 6 months ago 5
@Thinkfirst99 Right ON!Mother Superior would have 'dug' it...and anyhow a'cover' is a piece of cloth that 'changes the form' of whatever's underneath - it ain't meant to be 'musical cloning' -true???!creashonrebel
Mangosunsplash 5 months ago
@shamwoww no offense buddy, but that's bob dylan's "all along the watchtower"
TheSammaslamma 5 months ago 2
@TheSammaslamma umm did u read my comment, I clearly said Hendrix's is the cover. also wouldnt take offense cause nowadays I probably listen to Bob Dylan more than Jimi so I hear the original song alot. Its obviously a masterpiece, and somehow we've been even further blessed by Hendrix coming along and breathtakingly reimagining the song. oh and im not your buddy :D
shamwoww 5 months ago 3
@UNSUNGBAND But I do think this cover does capture the original spirit of the song, of course the band still leaves their unique touch, but all in all a good cover in my opinion.
rimefrostkitten 3 months ago
bah screw all the haters, this is as fine a cover as ever there was!
The Beatles' version is one of their best songs and as far as I'm concerned it's done justice here. They made it their own all the while keeping it an homage to the original.
sebytheman 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
wow, how awful is that, this version should be banned, oh maybe they were joking, man this sucks
regularpeople1970 2 years ago
woah stalin slow down there your opinion isn't fact and should not be treated as such, personaly I like this version much more mainly because I am not much of a Beatles fan but love the Pixies and the Breeders, honestly I can't see why this cover is getting such bad critisism it is a great alternative rock twist on the song.
Awesomo4003 2 years ago
i think i am entitled to my opinion and my opinion is that this version sucks, i know everyone doesn't get the beatles, that's cool, i personally don't care for this version although i like other breeders songs and other beatles covers
regularpeople1970 2 years ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
its not the people don't get the beatles its that they do not like them
Awesomo4003 2 years ago
nice cover!!
leomanya85 2 years ago
badass cover
Lucky09366 2 years ago
wow... this is kind of weak sauce
voivod 2 years ago
well well..you know.I first heard this song in this version.and it took me a while to warm up to the original when I started listening to the beatles years later...I really love this version..
gypsyola 2 years ago
Awesome version. I just uploaded a cover of my friend and I doing this song. 5 stars!
KellyIsMusical 2 years ago
you should listent to the beatles version - superior
internazionalikos 2 years ago 4
I don't understand why people put thumbs down on this. It's the truth--the Beatles version is superior. But that's not to say this version isn't great.
yeslauren 2 years ago 3
calm down,i didn't say that this version it's not good, i didn't know that you have heard the beatles version
so i suggested to listen to it
internazionalikos 2 years ago
ha ha, i was agreeing with you :D
people had put thumbs down on your comment, and i was wondering why because the Beatles version is a lot better than this but that this version is good, too.
yeslauren 2 years ago
that's right, my friend
internazionalikos 2 years ago
sure, this is a funny version only that...
bozco1504 2 years ago
both versions, in my opinion, are very good.
pretTilittlepoison 2 years ago
fuck off
rocketscience21 2 years ago
why you said that for?
internazionalikos 2 years ago
This version is great.Its really different from the original but that was on purpose.
This is one of their few covers,And Kim deal is a great songwriter.Maybe you should listen to their songs before you say they wish they could write a song like this.
reyrayolunar 2 years ago 5
To this day I still love this song as much as I love the original.
enchantedblack 2 years ago 6
This comment has received too many negative votes show
This is terrible. The original is WAY better.
Why is she whispering most of the song?
jjkmovies 2 years ago
Because it's a cover? And not the actual song? I think by definition it would be.. *cough* different.
FunkyPhasers 2 years ago 6
kinda shitty cover....
Synysterslash 2 years ago
@Synysterslash kinda shitty comment. great rendition you fool!
roejogan8 1 year ago
Cigarette lighter at :03 - :06!
hamtrak 2 years ago 2
Everybody wishes they could wright a song this good. Dumbass.
jab10289 2 years ago 10
@jab10289 "wright" hurr durr
CKYnHiFi 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
the breeders wish they could write a song this good...
contrologicII 2 years ago
I agree...one of the best Beatles covers ever...I also like Laibach's cover of The Two of Us and Across the Universe...Check it out
mitzjob 2 years ago
imagine by a perfect circle is agreat cover as well... It might be my favourite cover of all time.
HBturnip 2 years ago
what happened at 1:37?
safetosaydontquoteme 2 years ago
idk it's in my copy of the song too though
Ledcraft 2 years ago
I love it also... I just wish you could hear the intro better :(
malandr0bem 2 years ago
Great cover.
Probably one of the best covers of a beatles song i've ever heard.
chleague08 2 years ago
fantastic!
sunnyorsandy 3 years ago