Ron Paul Answers Global Warming Question at Iowa Straw Poll

[RichMatarese]

On the face of it, the attribution of significant adverse (!) global warming to purposeful CO2 emissions is preposterous. To prove this contention, honest and scrupulous scientific investigation is required, and thus far NONE of the touted government-funded "experts" in climate science who have advocated this hypothesis have conducted themselves in accord with the ethics of their supposed profession.

We've got a big "not proven" here, and DECLINING average temps since 1998 despite rising CO2.

[noevoe978]

Ugggg.... This is the only thing that stops me from being completely behind Ron Paul. He's the only candidate that makes sense when it comes to foreign policy and corporatism, but I don't know if I can vote for someone who believes that man only contribute partially to global warming...

[eamonearly]

@noevoe978 Man does only contribute partially to global warming. Moreover, if you study the e-mails released under the Freedom of Information Act you will see the collusion of plutocrat puppet scientists faking evidence to promote global warming. Its called eco-fascism in order to promote world taxation to support the central banking fiat system.

Please go to website whatreallyhappened and search for climategate. I would also recomend youtube search for WHAT ARE THEY SPRAYING

[RichMatarese]

@noevoe978 - I strongly suspect that you know precisely nothing about the "science" upon which the anthropogenic global warming (AGW) contention has been based, else you'd realize that continuing research has implacably proven that the gradual rebound from the Little Ice Age (beginning in 1700) has had nothing whatsoever to do with atmospheric CO2.

You've been suckered. Dr. Paul is right, and what you'd best worry about isn't climate WARMING but rather global COOLING.

[ProxifyStudios]

@RichMatarese "continuing research" The act to researching what has already being started suggesting that this research is still being carried out. Thus it has not - in the context of your comment - been proven that the C02 layer blanketing Earth is not causing Global Warming.

[RichMatarese]

@ProxifyStudios - OK, first it's safe to say you know nothing of logic. Nobody can "prove" a negative proposition. The burden of proof is on those who assert that "the CO2 layer" is CAUSING global warming, and no such proof has yet been provided.

Second, you know nothing of the sciences, either. The research of which I'd written has been conducted on the Earth's radiation budget, and it's shown that the energy incoming from the sun has been (and still is) being radiated away.