Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (62)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • LOL All liberals are punks when you get down to it.

  • Shorter snorp73:

    Waaaah!!! Simmons posted 30+ comments about how stupid everything from the Pi-Tea party to the preemptive claims of victory we dummies partake in.

    Waaah!!! He enjoyed every second of it, and said as much in yet another comment.

    Waaaaah!!!

    Oh, and he posts in the 3rd person! How...peculiar.

    It's nothing like writing conspiratorial reactionary gibberish on a black board or one's hand as a gimmick to reel in the rubes.

    Waaaah!!!

  • Now were all those ten rambling comments a response to just one of mine?

    Look in the mirror. You're obsessing. It's not healthy.

    The American people will voice their opinion next Tuesday and they will again in 2012.

    I personally hope Palin strings you guys along the entire way there. ;-)

  • @snorp73 To answer your question, no. They are there for my amusement. You are irrelevant to all besides being the harmless pissant I'm berating. It's okay that you want to flatter yourself like many a tea-tard I've ridicule on YT and abroad virtually, but Simmons will have forgotten I've ever had any interaction with a "snorp" by this time tomorrow.

  • @snorp73 As for your allusions to the corporate narrative you've convinced yourself will play out next week, exactly what is supposed to go down, anyway? Answer that, since your so reluctant to prove you're a fanatical liar that won't admit that you made shit up regarding your president, ya fraud-peddling bonehead. Exactly whose interests are the GOP fighting for, and why should individuals like myself be concerned?

  • @snorp73 This in't a fucking little league game, you ninny. It's not about winning. Just what the hell are you tea-tards about anyway? Half the shit you tea-tards deride - like various things that are "un-Constitutional - you can't speak at length about, and your entire platform seems to be nothing more than reactionary spite that the country moved forward socially from eras that you morons took no part in being that you weren't even born, half of which is coached by an Aussie meglomaniac.

  • @snorp73 Then there are the half-dead nitwits you dragged to your little rallies that often forget how backwards they are. Unless you want to admit that the GOP are corporate saboteurs bent on ruining America, you have no room to gloat next week or any time after. But, seriously...what exactly are you tea-tards expecting, 'cuz Simmons can give you a short list of what I'm expecting from the political party perpetually running on fumes, intellectually-speaking.

  • @snorp73 You dimbulbs have nothing to gloat about. If anything, you're simply proving to yourselves that you vote in an indiscriminate manner in a pathetic attempt to spite political opposition. Look at these lightweights you put up, with various scandals that the media helps whitewash out of corporate loyalty, talking out of two sides of their mouths, hiding from the low glare of the so-called "lamestream media." cameras like Frankenstein's Monster to fire etc. WEAK!

  • @snorp73 You've got a bunch of freaks that you'll vote for eagerly, because Democrats made you feel bad for two election cycles. Aww, poor babies. Listen, stow your empty threats, tea-tard. Simmons isn't worried about one damned thing next week or any to come after, while you dummies pray that the corporate media isn't selling you on a bill of goods on your collective vengeful attitudes.

  • @snorp73 Again, vote with all your heart, tea-tards. It's your duty as an American citizen. Chances are half you babies will be crying about voter fraud like half the right wing chumps are this very week preemptively. Your tea-tard bluffs fool no one, least of all Simmons.

  • @snorp73 So, unless you want to openly admit that the GOP are corporate saboteurs bent on ruining America, you have no room to gloat next week or any time after. But, seriously...what exactly are you tea-tards expecting, 'cuz Simmons can give you a short list of what I'm expecting from the political party perpetually running on auto-pilot, intellectually-speaking.

  • @snorp73 Don't dare flatter yourself at Simmons' expense, tea-tard weakling. Again, Simmons relishes laying a verbal smackdown on mental midgets hopped up on reactionary hate. To your credit, your not one of the usual con-servative yammerers that attempt to confound with racist language and such. My apologies for loading my many comments ridiculing you with colorful language. It ain't gonna stop, though. It's my style, and you wouldn't want to trample on my 1st Amendment right now...

  • @snorp73 What is that last line about, anyway? Is that some more of the projection you con-servaknaves persist in? How in the world is Sarahcuda stringing individuals like Simmons along? Shit, for two damned years, I've kept track of her words, from her denials of being in the running for (R) VP on Kudlow, to her alluding to her bitchiness at the RNC, to her quitting her job, and covering it up with some good, old-fashioned magical thinking. You're the morons that take her seriously, not me.

  • @SpiderSimmons WOW. I just realized, you were commenting in response to me up until 2am.

    All through it, you've spewed the same rhetoric she has plowed through since 2008. So, no real harm has been done.

    But more importantly, at 2am, I was sleeping. I had to get up for work this morning and I just checked my e-mail on my lunchhour.

    I guarantee, everyone else who did that will be supporting her.

  • @snorp73 Of, course you were sleeping at 2am. That's what tired tea-tards like you do when you tucker yourselves out with your own dimwittedness. With that said, Simmons really doesn't give a damn what hour you woke up to go to work or any other offline activity you bring up to deviate most pathetically. You're still here being the same dumb Palin fanatic and fraud-peddler I berated previously.

  • @snorp73 Silly rabbit, people with working brains see through her political word jumbles, and understand she ain't fit to serve in any office at this point. What more harm needs to be done to this woman you feel the need to defend like a imbecile? She lost a national race she impulsively participated in, and she's embarrassed herself and her state by quitting her post. I bear this woman no harm.

  • @snorp73 Away from politics, I'm sure she's a decent, perhaps effervescent, if extremely vindictive woman that I'd probably avoid all contact with. She'd probably avoid those like Simmons as well, since I like to ask follow-up questions, and do not fall for faux folksines. She plows through nothing. She succumbed to everything THEY (her enemies) said about her, even back in 2006. What's your frequency, Palin fanatic? Do you not see this fact?

  • @zvnteq7 They're both a couple of sellout scuzzbuckets talking shit because big money is backing them up.

  • Yeah, Jezabel Palin calls someone else a punk, someone that still has a job he did not walk away from. I'm no defender of a Politico hack, but she calls this media dork a "punk" on the show of a overfed warthog of a clown that channel a wanna-be Howard Stern by the end of this very interview. Sleazy ties to media powerhouses, and bluster befitting the most bratty of children does not make one courageous. They're both punks hiding behind Unca Rupie's pant leg from the big, bad media dorks.

  • I love Sarah. The best thing about her is how she enjoys the adversity from people and handles it like a pro and only loves the continuance of it.

  • @snorp73 Money men are protecting her. She's a brat that plays nanny to the astroturf tea-tard movement that the money men are using to counter the Democratic shift this country is in the process of undergoing.

    Their influence will wear thin, and with that she will fade as an afterthought, as all lame media personalities tend to. I do not begrudge her being a sellout, it's the intellectual cowardice, willful, prideful ignorance that gets me. I actually admired her at one point.

  • @SpiderSimmons Nonsense. You just described both Barack Obama's thick skin (who's gotten his protection from the media and whines like a ninny and calls people racists everytime they oppose him) and Hillary Clinton who runs around claiming to be a feminist, yet, when is repeatedly cheated on by her horny-hick-husband, she sacrifices her womanhood and self-respect to stay with him so she can stay in politics. Unlike her, Palin needed no man to get where she is. Democrats are absolute scum.

  • @snorp73 Correction: Obama's "THIN" skin.

  • @snorp73 You had it right the first time, as if the having the media, the tea-tards, the left, the right, the taliban, and nature itself on his ass, he's got a dummy named "snorp73" calling him a "ninny" for shit said dummy imagined.

    Go find that proof, dummy.

    When did President Obama call ANYONE "racist." I recall your whore idol, Glen Dreck, openly accusing the president of being one in order to please his corporate masters, but...the PotUS - Nope.

    Find the goddamned proof!

  • @snorp73 You know, Simmons is always amused when you tea-tards, brainwashed by Rupert and Roger, seek to vilify the very media establishment the likes of Palin and Beck are apart. You nitwits have been snookered by Madison Ave. placating your dulled senses. This leads you morons to espousing stupid shit like the PotUS being offered protection from a bunch of tea-tard nitwits predisposed to dislike him for his party affiliation to begin with.

  • What's brainwashing have to do with facts? Sarah Palin is not where she is because of who she is married to. Unlike half the Kennedy Clan, Michelle Obama, Hillary Clinton, she was not prepped since birth to run for public office. Like a Reagan or a Thatcher, Palin's segue into politics was gradual and offered the unique experience as an American first. Someone who paid taxes, who ran businesses, who knows more what its like to be me than anyone in Washington now.

  • @snorp73 Again, dumbass, WHERE is Palin? All your implications are like so many right wing reactionary claptrap. I'm not here to defend Democrats, I'm here to ridicule the notion that Bailin' or Dreck have a coherent thought that could be construed as beneficial to actual human beings, never mind the tea-tards that hear their dogwhistles.

    Of course, you're a spiteful reactionary Palin/Beck fanboy, so therefore, your allusion that Palin is more like you does not benefit any of your cases.

  • Palin is in the news. That's where she is. In fact, she's being discussd about right now and shall I count the number of posts you've made in this forum alone? Who made you do that?

    And as you attempt to make the case of where she is, it's her effectiveness and her apparent presence and power over these midterms that has you breakdancing in rage, thrashing your way to the most coherent defense and opposition imagineable.

    Dude, it's twisted. Accepting reality will only help you.

  • @snorp73 "Palin is in the news." What the hell is Simmons supposed to make of that non-sequitor, hmm?

    Again, you're the one focusing on defending Bailin', but Simmons made comments about Glen Dreck, as well, Palin fanatic.

    It is apparent that you dummies protect her like she's a precious porcelain doll.

    Ha!

    She's more like a dime a dozen Barbie copies now that she shilling for FNC.

  • @snorp73 "Breakdancing in rage"? Is that anything like when you asses joined your sister's tea party in '09 in order to stay relevant to the "lamestream media" you all hate?

    Listen, Simmons knows that this is an off-election year that the corporate media and the right wingers need to make dramatic. So they talk up the pathetic efforts of you tea-tards to rile yourselves up on latent bigotry, solipsism, and fascism, as well as your embrace of blatant hypocrisy and maliciousness.

  • @snorp73 As much as you dumdums like to think Americans are against you tea-tards making grounds, we're actually encouraging you asses to make all the ground you want. See, when the country is reminded that the Republibitches cannopt govern worth a damn, and are being kept afloat by corporations looking to turn the screws to the American working man, you will see the see-saw go back in our favor. What Pi-TEA Party will you join then, tea-tards.

  • @snorp73 Go vote with all your little hearts on the 2nd to prove the point that you've been sore since '06. The reckoning comes as soon as your reps get in, and are expected to do things besides act stupid for the "lamestream media" cameras. I promise.

  • @snorp73 Each and every Democrat you maen to demean has paid more in taxes than all you tea-tards put together. Boy, oh boy, FNC really has you fools actually believing your helping anything other than scoundrels divide the country either for personal political or financial benefit. It'd be funny, if it weren't so very, very boring to observe at this point. This is no different than '94, where the scrubs got your asses all hopped up on hate before an off-year election. '96 redux is forthcoming.

  • @SpiderSimmons Ah not here to defend Democrats yet you somehow believe that Democrats paid more in taxes than tea partiers. We are divided, but liberalism did it. There is only one party who advocates creating a society of makers in lieu of takers. Without makers, there are no taxes, no wealth to spread around. And for the record, I've hated liberals a lot longer than this election season alone. I have 10+ years of ranting and entertaining "debate" with them to prove it.

  • @snorp73 That is not a defense, it is a fact, you dolt. This is not a black or white issue. You go look up the finances of these people you deride, and compare them to those who openly support the Pi-Tea Party you're defending.

    Simmons does not care how long you've hated liberals, you presumptuous twit. Simmons and most normal individuals come out of the womb despising wicked bastards seeking to divide the country with political stunts like the Pi-Tea Party, and scrubs like Dreck and Bailin.

  • @snorp73 You won't have proof of President Obama calling people "racist" next week, I'm assuming, you degenerate fabricator.

  • @snorp73 The fact that you're doubling down on your misguided Palin/Beck fanaticism and defenses is neither surprising or fascinating. I'd said my piece here before you offered yourself up to be the latest YT dumdum to get smacked around verbally. All your Sean Vannity-style revisionism, and your rose-colored sophistry is meaningless to Simmons.

    I'm not here to argue political perceptions with a tea-tarded person, you intellectual naif.

    Stop reaching.

  • @snorp73 Oh, and where that proof you were supposed to retrieve, hm?

    In hell, with your con-servadork ideology, I'm guessing.

    You can find videos of Dreck calling the PotUS a "rascist," but not the other way around.

    Here's what you do: you crawl back to the alleyway behind FNC headquarters in Manhattan, NY and beg for a saucer of milk, ok, pussycat.

    I think you're done tasking yourself for more silly shit to say before SpiderSimmons.

  • Ok, 33 coments in here.

    You wrote 22 of them.

    Clearly not dealing with a well-balanced mind and the idea that you refer to yourself in the 3rd person coupled with the fact of what's going to happen next Tuesday on election day is probably indicative of the fact that you don't need anymore torture from an effective tea partier like me or our beauteous Sarah.

    Let's chat one week from tonight.

  • @snorp73 Yes, it always boild down to you tea-tards playing The Count and referring to my online theatrics. You all always pounce so readily, on minimal articles. I ridicule tea-tardism with relish, where you dumdums complain about how many messages Simmons posts. w/e

    If things go the way the corporate media and the wingnut punditry , and if Simmons pays YT a visit and can distinguish you from all the other tea-tards gloating like brats, I'll ridicule you in a manner similar to today. Promise.

  • @snorp73 Hey, nincompoop, let's see the many examples of proof of President Obama calling someone "racist."

    I take it those moments are similar to how Palin rails against the very "lamestream media" she quit her government job to join. Notice she calls derides them when they don't take her intellectual shots in the dark seriously.

    You Sarahcuda fanatics are very dull, save for your fervent, yet pathetic defenses of the Quitter Queen.

    Anyway, go find that proof, ya doof.

  • Well it IS the Lamestream media, it's soo lame the president cries everytime he is criticized. As Ann Coulter said, Michelle is more likely to turn on him before the media will which is why he is hysterical. White liberals picked Obama for the explicit purpose of being able to cry out racism everytime someone opposes him and Obama gratified that by stating we still suffer from racism in this country. Palin has definitely taken a bigger beating and whines a lot less about it.

  • @snorp73 It only got "lame" when the started letting intellectual scrubs like Vannity, Dreck, and the whole motley crew of right wing chicken squawkers AND the sycophants, sellouts, and scuzzbuckets that put up with them. All your dimwit innuendo regarding the motives of others is extremely laughable. The only reason the wingers cling to Palin is because they know the fanboys are tired of looking at the same dusty bitter white pills, so they chose the photogenic AK puppet to rile you dummies up.

  • @snorp73 Silly tea-tard, the woman quit her job as governor supposedly because people (liberals, con-servatives, Russians, etc.) were picking on her, and costing the state money. So she became a burden to the state she governed after becoming loser McCain's running mate. She whines with the worst of them, meaning the entire tea-tard movement that she's co-opted for financial benefit. Try tying her to the tea-tards in 2012. You dummies will find out real quick. She'll lose regardless.

  • @SpiderSimmons And what I pointed about Palin getting a bigger beating is also indicative of how much better she'd be leading. Palin LOVES adversity, she welcomes it. I thank God for Palin-watch groups and haters alike because they only strengthen her, keep her name out there, and make people smirk and go "Oh brother" when they attempt to make a serious point about Baby Trig, or her alleged "lying" about being pregnant. Obama couldn't take it which is why he has no conviction or guts.

  • @snorp73 Palin loves adversity so much she's made her bed on FNC instead of being a free agent when she quit her job. See, FNC is always in need of washed-up politicians that are willing to say things fed to them by Ailes's minions. She's a big fan of adversity, which is why she continues to go out of her depth intellectually, then acts disturbed when those she seeks council with deem her to be an ambitious moron. Yes, how blessed she is to weather such adverse conditions due to her ignorance.

  • @snorp73 RE: your Hillary hate. I'm not the biggest Hillary supporter, yet I'll wager she's actually a studious individual, unlike Palin, who gets flustered when asked about things as minimal as mags she reads, and the very job she ran for in '08. While your regurgitating Raggady Ann Coulter's rhetoric about the former PotUS, ask Palin whether she's a "feminist" herself. Her opinion seems to change when the wind blows or more likely, when she feels a "feminist" has to answer too many questions.

  • @snorp73 If you want to get personal, go find Palin and ask why she felt she had to lie about being pregnant. I'm sure the snowbillies in AK would have understood that she had a pregnant daughter. What was with that ruse? Oh, right, the attention...

  • @SpiderSimmons Who lied about being pregnant? And women often times keep pregnancies a secret for different reasons. In Palin's case, it is probably sexism which says a woman cannot govern while they do it. Or in your case, in a nicer way, imply she isn't studious.  And man, one comment and you're all over the place. Are you a Palin obesser? Where is this all coming from?

  • @snorp73 So what you're saying is that Palin denied her womanhood in order to fit into the political archetype?

    Yes, it always boils down to someone being "obsessed" with the woman that likes to tease that God almighty may tell her to run for president. Yes, every American is "obsessed" with her, not you fanatics defend every stupid thing she does, says, or encourages.

    You know, Simmons missed a few of the dumb things you posted to me...

    Oh, and why ain't you defending Dreck?

  • @snorp73 Who the hell are you to talk of anyone "sacrificing their womanhood," you idiot? I'm assuming if you are a female, you're a wanna-be in every way, shape, and form. Exalting a stumblebum like Palin politically because she reminds you of your feisty i.e. impulsive and dimwitted aunt or something stupid like that.

    Are you fanatics kidding Simmons with this bullshit?

  • Comment removed

  • @snorp73 Palin needed no man to get where she is? Well, where exactly is that, my dear dumbass? She's on FNC, which is Unca Rupie's company. She was picked out of obscurity to be J. Sidney's running mate, meaning she played second fiddle to the weasel. She uses her hubby's maiden name, which is now a household word, not "Heath"

    Look, you're an intellectual lightweight not for your pathetic efforts, but for even considering taking on Simmons in a debate over anything, including your stupidity.

  • Sarah is an unfulfilled housewife with an overbearing father complex (and who knows what other psychological problems). She's been propped up by some very high-rollers who are using her for their own aims - and those aims have nothing to do with common sense or conservatism. Wonder if she'll ever figure it out...

  • Sarah is awesome!!

  • LOL, that's just funny. "You can pick on me, but don't mess with Glenn!" It always gets me when people accusing everyone else of lying get busted. Can we just deal with issues? "But he's not dealing with issues either!" What are we, 5?

  • @surfer53 IOKIYAR

    No, there's no need to besmirch 5 year olds.

    Bailin' and Blecch are tea-tards, both bought and paid for cheerleaders for the willful stupidity of, perhaps, two quarters of the right wing in America.

  • @SpiderSimmons Ahh so you disagree with Beck. I'm starting to understand this code language. If someone is stupid it's because someone else disagrees with them politically. People think they're smart because they don't talk straight. Anyone who thinks right-wing america or left-wing america is to blame and then calls people "willful cheerleaders" needs to re-examine that statement. Partisanship itself is slavery. But then again, people hate the Tea Party for what they see on the news.

  • @surfer53 You know, mental weaklings like you really aught to steer clear of anything approaching sarcasm. You sound like a pre-schooler mimicking an adult.

    Since you two dummies feel like defending the Quitter Queen and her jester co-hort, I'll simply ridicule your efforts to read like one of your idols, aiming pathetic barbs at target you only think I'm here to defend.

    Tea-tard puppies get kicked when Simmons enters a discussion.

    Let's go.

  • @surfer53 Firstly, there's not much intellectual material within ANY Glen Dreck showcase. It's all addle-brained con-servadork blather that isn't very interesting to listen to if you know the buffoon speaking it is, at this point, a pasty clown for hire. Considering that word jumble you just had to post in reaction to my comments, I don't even think you know what the hell you're attempting to say. Did Simmons case a malfunction in your brain when referring to the tea-tard idols' profession?

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more