The google guy is wrong with the formula. The formula is PR(A) = (1-d) + d (PR(T1)/C(T1) + ... + PR(Tn)/C(Tn)) ..... C(T) is the number of outdegree links from another page that links to your page. The formula doesn't show any impact to your rank PR(A) when having links in your site, instead, there is a possitive contribution to your rank from others Pages PR(T) which link to you, this contribution is minimized when the number of links on that page are many C(T). The guy is wrong
fuck he looks like a scary robots from an horror scify movie wearing the same clothes every day and telling you "Hi Mr smith how are you going today" with a stupid smile. thanks google to show you are not a human compagny buta brainwashing machine
@Junije1 that's all your arguments... I think google employees have to socialize more when we see how they recruite people. they really looks like a family with consanguinity dirorder . this guy is the stereotype of johnny5 employee... no sorry johnny5 had human feelings. my grand father in his grave probably socialize more than you and him...lol
This might be a dumb question so please forgive me if it is. Would this apply to an indexed style site map? What I mean is what if all the items on a site that are alphabetically listed on a sitemap go well over 500 links on that page? Would that site be penalized in some way or considered a link farm or spammy?
@crashxxx If he "don't want not us to know something", then why on earth did they make this channel. Google could just leave us in the dark about everything, but they don't. They actually care about good search results, so that they can serve their customers well. So it is in their best interest that people will make websites with good content that they can crawl well and hence give their custumors good SERPs. THAT is why they are NOT lying (very often ;-)). Btw, Nice answer Matt, thanks.
Good to hear an update about this, been wondering about this for the past few years (when I started SEO I kept hearing about this "link cap" but never saw any solid evidence that it was true)
This is a very professional answer to the question. It shows that he is very knowledgeable about things in Google.
agapitoflores001 3 months ago
good to know, was wondering that myself.
TheDeepEndDesign 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Do you recommend finding one article per content link page? or multiple? ie...?
if you were to find multiple cinnamon coffee cake recipe articles,
would you stack them all on that one page or would you build out multiple pages for all of the articles?
mr24bd 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Try to add some Description for Photos not for SEO purpose
but for people. That will
help you.
You can also share in Flickr that may help you rank well.
mr24bd 4 months ago
The google guy is wrong with the formula. The formula is PR(A) = (1-d) + d (PR(T1)/C(T1) + ... + PR(Tn)/C(Tn)) ..... C(T) is the number of outdegree links from another page that links to your page. The formula doesn't show any impact to your rank PR(A) when having links in your site, instead, there is a possitive contribution to your rank from others Pages PR(T) which link to you, this contribution is minimized when the number of links on that page are many C(T). The guy is wrong
lookingsomevideos 5 months ago
@lookingsomevideos I guess you don't know that he made the PR rating algorithm in 2000.
Chankeypathak 16 hours ago
La traducción al español es penosa, y los tiempos que se dedican a cada frase de los subtítulos están muy mal repartidos.
potoco 9 months ago
Good answer, thanks Matt.
recipedude2 11 months ago
I like the yellow backdrop. :) Best yet!
kinfair 1 year ago 5
fuck he looks like a scary robots from an horror scify movie wearing the same clothes every day and telling you "Hi Mr smith how are you going today" with a stupid smile. thanks google to show you are not a human compagny buta brainwashing machine
auberon36 1 year ago
@auberon36 You need to go out more and socialize...
Junije1 1 year ago
@Junije1 that's all your arguments... I think google employees have to socialize more when we see how they recruite people. they really looks like a family with consanguinity dirorder . this guy is the stereotype of johnny5 employee... no sorry johnny5 had human feelings. my grand father in his grave probably socialize more than you and him...lol
auberon36 1 year ago
@auberon36 Dude, you need some professional help...
Junije1 1 year ago
@Junije1 in IT probably... but certainly not yours... anyway, have a nice day in "the village" salutations to No 2
auberon36 1 year ago
/watch?v=hsARuAA7Htc
und was macht ihr wenn ihr Langeweile habt..?^^
Dimawesome 1 year ago
is this really from a five year old blind kid????
richardiweanoge 1 year ago
@richardiweanoge not exactly
iamhyder 1 year ago
What if your page with 5000 links is the SITEMAP? It will definitely look like you're stuffing things in there.
arthurjach1 1 year ago
thanks Matt
HolidayNova 1 year ago
Yes... but... more links will slow page loads down and get your listing reduced
Films4You 1 year ago
Good video. Thanks Matt!
HardTimesHardBodies 1 year ago
MOAR VIDDDSSSSS!!!
highlander2107 1 year ago
This might be a dumb question so please forgive me if it is. Would this apply to an indexed style site map? What I mean is what if all the items on a site that are alphabetically listed on a sitemap go well over 500 links on that page? Would that site be penalized in some way or considered a link farm or spammy?
fabfashionistas 1 year ago
not at all, but too below texts besides attendance I will remind you of free willy
uchoa55 1 year ago
Where do people ask those questions?
I would like to ask one also.
DksCoreZ 1 year ago
so in other words, yes more than 100 links is gonna sink your page pretty bad
bigal21110 1 year ago
Another stupid SEO myth bites big dust burgers. Phew!
wearealltubes 1 year ago
@wearealltubes most of them are just that. Best SEO strategy is to create good content and build an audience.
BeeRich33 1 year ago
I think this guy lie with every word he says, he don't want we to know anything..
crashxxx 1 year ago
@crashxxx If he "don't want not us to know something", then why on earth did they make this channel. Google could just leave us in the dark about everything, but they don't. They actually care about good search results, so that they can serve their customers well. So it is in their best interest that people will make websites with good content that they can crawl well and hence give their custumors good SERPs. THAT is why they are NOT lying (very often ;-)). Btw, Nice answer Matt, thanks.
ToSho29 1 year ago 4
@ToSho29 Because he misdealing, he want you to think something it's good when it's wrong.
crashxxx 1 year ago
@crashxxx Yes, and you know a monster hides under your bed too!
adithecool 1 year ago
Nice name there, buddy.
Kenfied 1 year ago
Finally the word of boss :)
diogomattosmobile 1 year ago
Good to hear an update about this, been wondering about this for the past few years (when I started SEO I kept hearing about this "link cap" but never saw any solid evidence that it was true)
MrOldSchoolApps 1 year ago
glad to hear that one cleared up
clifico 1 year ago