I would like to add to u r point mr naik that a UN survey report's tell that 90% of non muslim people's those who convert to islam revert back to there original religion in less then 3 year's
My dear Dr naik u just said that spreading of slam by sword is a mith, Then can u tell me why was Khalsa panth established by guru govind singh ji in year 1699 AD
Khalsa panth was established in order to fight against the muslim ruler's who forcefully converted hindu's to islam
Entire Sikh history is the proof of the fact that islam was spreaded forcefully
In shree guru granth sahid ji (sacred book of Sikhism) It is mentioned at several places the brutality of muslim people
@zxcvbnm7644 Have you even been listening to Zakir, violence was never a factor when Islam spread, It was just muslim people emigrating and spreading Islam peacefully, there is 138 million Indian Muslims! India is just a BIG country to convert. Islam spread peacefully to all corners of the earth, like it or not Islam will be dominant.
Dr. Naik said:If Muslims wanted to convert all the Hindus in India we could have done it.
THIS IS A LIE
Mughal Emperors did want to convert everyone in India to Islam.
Emperor Jahangir specifically warned his nobles that they "should force Islam on anyone."
Look up the Mughal Emperor Aurangzeb. his policy of temple destruction, his prohibition on music, his demolition of Christian settlements, and his enslavement of Christian converts.
And bdw d 1st indian empire is round abt 500 bc, and it makes aprox 1000 yrs b4 islam! ur maurya empire came in2 being aftr ALexendr d gr8 and Aryan invaders. it means hindus wr again slaves to dem! ds reflects dat hindus have brain whch accepts slavry vry easily in front of their superiors, bt in front of muslims no 1 stands, caz they know how 2 take their right 4rm evils and how 2 defeat dem!
u r such a pee brain, how can u say dat u ruled pakis only, as pak wz nt there at dat tym and 2ndly d Maurya empire wz more dominent in present india den in present paki, there wz no power ful religion at dat tym so dats y maurya empire wz extensive, but yes ds z true dat muslims ruled over u 4 yrs, and u were fuking slaves 2 us!
of course this is true that pakistani and indian cultures were same before islam, and wat culture hindus had and have? d stupid of all ! praying d fuking stones refined by ur own hands? haha, wat a culture, and dat drinking d pea of ur cow mother, hilarious!
@jarmen - Really is that why Lebanon is 50% Christian, or is that why the Yazedi population has only grown over the past 13 mellenians and the only time it has shrunk is during the current Iraq war. Also is that why the Indian always remained a Hindu majority.
Also explain to me why the most populus country in the world Indonesia is Muslim without a single Muslim army ever having been there?
Also how about the Uighurs in China which Muslim army converted them?
dude go n read about timur's conquest of india,100000 hindus wer executed in 1 day,go n read about mahmud of ghazni's destruction of somnath temple.50000 hindus died defendin it and mahmud ordered killin of all incudin women and children 500000 people died 40000 wer taken as slaves n sold in arabian markets,akbar ordered execution of 30000 rajputs,auarngzeb ordered execution of 10000 jats,mohammad bin qasim killed mroe than 100000 people in his conquest of sindh and u say islam is peace fuck u
go n read baout the heroic resistance of the infidel ancestors of the afghan people who wer defeated by deciet in the battle of kabul in 980 when muslims armies attacked the hindu n buddhist afghan army in the middle of the night dressed as hindu brahmins,go n search haqiqat rai a 12 yr odl hindu boy who ws executed 4 balspheming the prophet but refused to convert to islam,guru tegh bahadur boiled alive 4 nt converting,7 n 8 yr odl son of guru gobins singh buried alive 4 nt converting
guru tegh bahadur beheaded in chandni chowk 4 nt converting,today thr r no pre islamic arab polythiests,christians and jews left in saudi arabia whr r they?whr r the zoroastrians of iran?40000 of them wer slaughtered in 1 day by invading arab muslims,go n read abt the spread of islam in iran spread by the sword,nalanda university ws destroyed by muslims and all 100000 buddhist n hindu monks wer burned alive,no wonder nt even a single university ws opened in india during islamic rule
@thescorpionking - What the hell are you talking about? Who did Timur attack in India, it was the Delhi Sultanate themelves being Muslim. How about you actually read real historical aspect and diffrenciate between religious conquests and just conquests themselves. Timur fought more Muslims than non-muslims.
And Mahmud Ghazni was attacked by Jayapala with the help of the Rajput confederacy. Who wouldn't retaliate, again what does this have to do with religion though?
mahmud of ghazni committed genocide of hindus and tht has nuthin gt to do with religion wow,he glorified his genocide of hindus in his books and looted various temples enslaved women and children wich is absolutely allowed in islam
@thescorpion - Well thank you for swearing at me that really you puts you in higher regard during a discussion. Secondly you have avoided the whole point of my post. Timur attacked the Delhi Sultanate as you admit, a Muslim kingdom. Thus what does he have to do with Religion?
With Ghazni it was the same it was not a conquest of Religion but of materialism but like stated and recorded by hisotry the conflict was instigated by the Hindu King Jayapal.
timur attacked delhi sulatanate coz they were 2 linient on thr non muslim subjects and when he came he killed and committed genocide of hindus for absoklutely no reason
@thescorpionking - You keep on changing your story not for the purposes of historical verification but rather for a round of Islam bashing. Timur attacked the Delhi Sultanate because of the reason that starts any other war in most cases money and conquest no other reason. He didn't care how the Delhi sultanate treated their subjects because he didn't care about Sultanate itself. You say I should not make a mockery of the people who were killed but the reality is you want to rewrite history...
@thescorpion - ...history so that it suits your specific position. In fact there is not even a consensus among the hostorians about whether he even watned to rule India or not.
Also how convnient is it to say that the Hindu empires which existed were not actually not the result of hindu teaching, that is unnatural. All ancient Kings used religion as a rallying point for their troops. Thus the Nanda, or Maymar empires all used Hinduism as a driving force when conquering foreign lands.
@thescopion - Also please don't list to me Sikh gurus, I was born a Sikh. However unlike you I learned that that suffering that those people caused upon rightous men was not due to Islam but rather their own incompetence. Like I mentioned earlier Aurengzeb was more than willing to kill his father a disgusting person like that has no place in any religion.
Shah Jahan's style of organizing enslavement campaigns is illustrative of the Mughal strategy to rally religious and political forces behind what essentially was a move for acquisition of valuable human and biological resources.
in 1632 Shah Jahan ordered all recently constructed or partially-constructed Hindu temples obliterated. Seventy-six temples were destroyed in Benares n 10000 inhabitants wer executed by being "blown up with powder, drowned in water or burnt by fire". As a result of this campaign, 4000 were taken captive to Agra where they were tortured to try to convert them to Islam. Only a few apostatised; the remainder were trampled to death by elephants, except for the younger women who went to harems
@thescorpion - Then you go on to say that the only legacy of the Muslims is illiteracy wow...what an arbitrary and one sided statement you cite Spain as an example, well I don't know which publication you use for your history but if you read any good History book (such as those published by Oxford Publishing house etc) you'll see that there is a universal consensus among scholars and hostorians that the Golden age of Spain was under Muslim rule, Alhambara was world renowned...Cnt
ddude dont say bullshit aurangzeb and shahjahn belonged to the same class of hienious human beings,shah jahan killed n blinded his brothers to become king and auragzeb did tht to his own brothers he nevr killed shah jahan put him in solitery confinement for 8 years b4 he dies,it ws under shah jahan tht 76 tempels wer destroyed and hindus wer sold in slave markets and hidnu women had to specifically be sold to only muslim merchants
Abd Allah Khan Firuz Jang, an Uzbek noble at the Mughal court during the 1620s and 1630s, was appointed to the position of governor of the regions of Kalpi and Kher and, in the process of subjugating the local rebels, ``beheaded the leaders and enslaved their women, daughters and children, who were more than 2 lacks [200,000] in number
When Shah Shuja was appointed as governor of Kabul he carried on a ruthless war in the Hindu territory beyond Indus. Most of the women burnt themselves to death to save their honour. Those captured were distributed among Muslim Mansabdars.Under Shah Jahan, peasants wer compelled 2 sell their women n children to meet thr revenue requirements. d peasants wer carried off 2 various markets d fairs 2 b sold wth thr poor unhappy wives carrying their small children crying and lamenting.
slave of the Ghurid Sultan Muizz u-Din, Qutb-ud-din Aybak (r. 1206-10 as the first of the Shamsi slave-kings) invaded Gujarat in 1197 and placed some 20,000 people in bondage. Roughly six years later, he enslaved an additional 50,000 people during his conquest of Kalinjar. Later in the 13th century, Balban's campaign in Ranthambore, reportedly defeated the Hindu army and yielded "captives beyond computation"
Zia uddin Barani suggested that Sultan Alauddin Khilji owned 50,000 slave-boys, in addition to 70,000 construction slaves. Sultan Firuz Shah Tughluq is said to have owned 180,000 slaves, roughly 12,000 of whom were skilled artisans.[45][46][47][48][49][50] A significant proportion of slaves owned by the Sultans were likely to have been military slaves and not labourers or domestics
@thescorpion - Also I am not talking about Muslim historians and academics but rather Western ones.
In fact Noah Feldman the law professor (a practicing Jew) from Harvard University and a fellow at Yale said that Shari'a at the time of its inception granted more legal rights to minorities and women than any other legal system out there, and in fact that when common law was surplanted it, it actually eroded the rights of the individual.
The Kesava Deo temple in Mathura, marked the place that Hindus believe was the birth place of Shri Krishna.[29] In 1661 Aurangzeb ordered the demolition of the temple, and constructed the Katra Masjid mosque. Traces of the ancient Hindu temple can be seen from the back of the mosque. Aurangzeb also destroyed what was the most famous temple in Varanasi- the Vishwanath Temple
@thescorpion - ...cnt. Under most of the Moghul rule, I suggest you go to the Pergamom Museum in Berlin germany to see the permanent exhibition of South Asian Art.
I am not saying Muslim rule however was a perfect just like any other empire it had deep fisures but not due religion but rather the falibility of man.
Also you keep on talking about Islam as some sort of unified entity, well let me tell you there are over 73 sects each with their own theology and dogma out of them all only one...
Aurangzeb banned Diwali, placed a jizya (tax) on non-Muslims and martyred the ninth Sikh guru Tegh Bahadur.[28]
During his reign, tens of thousands of temples were desecrated: their facades and interiors were defaced and their murtis (divine images) looted.[28] In many cases, temples were destroyed entirely; in numerous instances mosques were built on their foundations, sometimes using the same stones.
@thescorpion - cntd. sect teaches violence. Whabism, all these terrorist orginizations such as Al-Qaeda and Taliban are Wahabi a sect which came about only a hundred or so years ago. They are like the Christian Lord's Resistance Army in Uganda a twisted orginization which draw no distninction between muslim and non-muslims hence they have killed more muslims than non-muslim.
Have you ever heard of any Ahmadi, Aga Khani, Sufi, Dervish, Maliki Muslims and so forth ever wanting to blow...
sikander bustikhan of kashmir ordered all golden and silver images to be broken down and they used to be stepping stones of mosques,idoltary ws banned and 24000 hindu kashmiri brahmins wer executed when they refused to accept the order,rest of them wer boiled alive and those who conevrted wer spared,,under the tughlaq empire 22 brahmins wer executed for sayni tht hinduism and islam are equal,in haryana 5000 people wer executed for erecting image of a locla diety
@thesc - to blow themselves up? No! Because the reality is contrary to you you believe Islam does not teach the killing of 'Infidel' as you call them.
I suggest you look into other sects and as to what they preach rather than just specfically seeking out contention for your own personal benefit.
dude u deny the fact tht muslims ever persecuted hindus and tried to convert them at the point of sword,evryone knows tht even the pakistanis wud accept it,destroyed temples,universitites,nalanda,vikramshilawer all destroyed by a muslims and nt even a single college or university opened in india during evil muslim rule,thr is a mosque at the place where krishna ws born,aurangzeb banned diwali and jizya ws implemented on hindus
Writer Fernand Braudel wrote in A History of Civilizations (Penguin 1988/1963, p. 232-236), Islamic rule in India as a "colonial experiment" was "extremely violent", and "the Muslims could not rule the country except by systematic terror. Cruelty was the norm burnings, summary executions, crucifixions or impalements, inventive tortures.
Hindu temples were destroyed to make way for mosques. On occasion there were forced conversions. If ever there were an uprising, it was instantly and savagely repressed: houses were burned, the countryside was laid waste, men were slaughtered and women were taken as slaves
@thesc - Firstly thank you for copying and pasting half of wikipedia, and second of all you still haven't answered anything I have said. You keep on refering to Aurengzeb and the Mughals and being some sort of religious authority of Islam. In fact in technicality these people had no jurisdictions as Islam does not recognize monarchies as a proper form of government.
Also you admit to the fact that Aurengzeb and his predecessors killed each other to attain power, there is no religious...
@thesc - *cntd* attributes in their actions. Those people were the epitomy of materialism. Just like all other monarchs around the world have been. I follow the likes of Khan Abdul Ghaffar Khan a true devout Muslim who reflected the true teachings of Islam. He was a man whose convictions reflected Islam in its essence.
Also you keep on refering to Sikh gurus, but Sikhism's Granth is full of Muslim hymns along with Hindu ones. Also they repelled Mughal advances just as much as Hindu Rajput ones
king jaypal did nt go to ghazni to kill mahmud,he wanted to take revenge for his father death at his hands,wat had the somanth temple and its peaceful inhabtanta gt to do with it,what had kesava dao temple got to do with it,what had those 50000 hindus who dies defendin got to do with it,coz islam says tht killin infidels is allows and tkain thr womne as slaves is allowed sum beautiful things tht islam teaches
@thescorpion - You might like to perceive that history is linear but that is not the case, it is influenced by its enviorment which includes politics. So you recounting historical fights for your own personal opinion highlights your own ignorance towards it.
The same applied to Hindu empires, why did Ashoka become a Budhist in the first place? It was because he saw the destruction his Hindu forces had caused and the severe suffering. So do not tell me that Hindus are some sort of peace train!
dude i nev said hindus r sum sort of peace trian ok i nevr said tht,ashoika becmae buddhist coz his army committed a genocide a kalinga war and when he sw all tht destruction he ws devasted and he accepted buddhism coz it gave him peace and more evr go n read he still continued to worship hindu gods and various of his inscriptions regard hindu brahmins highly,his grandosn reinstituted vedic relgiiona s the state religion,he spread buddhism worldwide with peace
@thescorpion - The reality of the matter is that Empires, and Kings have fought and you assoicating their actions as some sort of relgiously sanctioned practice is pathetic. The Byzantine Christians were opposed by the Armenian Christians each according to your process must have been acting in accordance with their faith then?
It is obvious that Hindu empires were also opposed, they were no exception to any other empires you denying or thinking otherwise changes nothing.
c dude u r gettin it all wrong c its fien i no u will try to defend ur faith nuthin wrong with tht,but wat i m sayin thth muslims in the midieval era wud attack the civilian population of conquered regimes destroy universities temples,force people to convert thts wat happened in kashmir and today it is 95% muslim bcoz ur quran says so it legalizes slave trade and sexual relationships with female slaves this is evil and muslims did alll thth coz islam teaches tht
@thescorpion - Also people like yourself always try to convey that oh that 'Hinduism' was not spread with the sword and was somehow present in the South Asia and the Sub-continent through magic, how about you highlight empires such as the Magdha, the Nanda Empire, and than the Maurya empire which conquered the Nanda and then expanded westwards into modern Afghanistan and southern Iran, and later the expansion was Soutwards.
and dude u r tryin tht hinduism ws spread by the sword ok first go n read how hinduism came,it comes from an indo aryan vedic cultutre not founded by any person,tht ws the same in ancient iran,afghanistan,pakistan,they used to worship various gods iranian prophet zoroaster rejected thth religion and zoroastrianism was born,later on this indo aryna culture became the vedic religion arnd 3000 bc with composition of vedas and then the mixture of buddhism,vedic religion became hinduism
dude nt once in history did indians go to any other n try to conquer it and convert its people by the sword ok dotn compare ur evil islam spreadin by thes word killing millions of people in its way to hinduism or spread of buddhism they wer spread peacefully,hinduism in afghanistan is as old as hinduism itself,and afghnistan ws always ruled by sum hindu-buddhist dyansties or zoroastrian persians,ok hindu brahmins too k vedas to south asia,south east asia
hinduism is nt a defined religion it comes from the vedas but the way a south indian practices hinduism may be much different form tht of a north indian,they hav different sets of dieties sharin sum though but the only common fact are the vedas,upanishads and bhagavad gtia and different hindus percieve them differently,it s a personal choice,hinduism means belief of people living on other side of indus valley it snt an organized religionlik islam or christianity
dude u cn try defendin islam or watever u want but just dont make mockery of those people who died but didi nt conevrt to ur evil religion,go n search banda singh bahadur,guru tegh bahadur,guru arjun dev,guru gobind singh 7 n 8 year old sons,haqiqat rai,rani durgavati,shamabha ji they all died humilitaing deaths at the hands of muslims 4 refusin to convert to ur religion fo peace,hindu kush mountains means hindu slaughter where millions of hindus died
ddue when maratahs,rajputs,sikhs defeated muslim empires nt once do we see there armies destroyon mosques,implementing taxes on muslim populations,attackin civiliains or muslim women burning themselves in fire in order to prevent converting to hinduism,nt once in india di we see this duringmuslim rule all this happened millions of people slaughtered nt even a single university or college ws opened to promote education,most of the times busy tryin to gain converts nuthin else
india's poverty,illiteracy are legacy of islamic rule in india,thts y muslims wer kciked out of spain and thts wat needs to be done to them in india,in all world conflicts todays muslims are involved,muslims go otu n bomb themselves killing inncoent womena dn children,earlier u used swords to terrorze people nt the bombs,muslims plundered n looted india much more than the british at least the birtish did nt force ny1 at the point of sword to convert to christianity
@thesc - You then continue to talk about jiziya as most people trying to prepetuate a myth. Well let me tell you something simple, the tax system of the time asked muslims to pay more and also requred them to serve withing the national service. The zakat was always higher than the jizya, and like everything else it is given a negativee connatation on purpose.
Do countries not levy taxes nowadays? Every empire has had a tax system, and out of them all one of the lowest and fairest has been...
Mahmud of Ghazni was an Afghan Sultan who invaded the Indian subcontinent during the early 11th century. His campaigns across the gangetic plains are often cited for their iconoclastic plundering and destruction of temples such as those at Mathura and he looked upon their destruction as an act of "jihad"
@kikusdream Mahmud's invasion as one in which he put "thousands of Hindus to the sword" and made a pastime of "raising pyramids of the skulls of the Hindus".
Muhammad Ghori committed genocide against Hindus at Kol (modern Aligarh), Kalinjar and Varanasi, according to Hasan Nizami's Taj-ul-Maasir, 20,000 Hindu prisoners were slaughtered and their heads offered to crows
Historical records compiled by Muslim historian Maulana Hakim Saiyid Abdul Hai attest to the iconoclasm of Qutb-ud-din Aybak. The first mosque built in Delhi, the "Quwwat al-Islam" was built after the demolition of the Hindu temple built previously by Prithvi Raj and certain parts of the temple were left outside the mosque proper.
Firuz Shah Tughluq was the third ruler of the Tughlaq dynasty of the Delhi Sultanate. The "Tarikh-i-Firuz Shah" is a historical record written during his reign that attests to the systematic persecution of Hindus under his rule.[27] In particular, it records atrocities committed against Hindu Brahmin priests who refused to convert to Islam
An order ws accordingly given 2 d Brahman n was brought before Sultan. d true faith ws declared 2 d Brahman nd d right course pointed out. but he refused 2 accept it. A pile was risen on which the Kaffir with his hands nd legs tied ws thrown in2 nd d wooden tablet on d top
d pile was lit at 2 places his head nd his feet. d fire first reached him in the feet and drew from him a cry and then fire completely enveloped him. Behold Sultan for his strict adherence to law and rectitude
@thesc - So contrary to what you might light to think History (like mentioned earlier) is not linear or apolitical events and individuals form the outcome of what is now called history. You don't know what was going on 1000 years ago you weren't there, and thus looking at history through bias and flawed inference will give an outcome whic in itself is flawed.
Also you totally have ignored my comments on Tax and indication of what Prof. Noah Feldman (Harvard) has said, but rather only have...
@thesc - *cntd* espoused you own view. A conversation is not the slinging of accusations but rather a civilized discourse which needs to be approached from a neutral perspective.
@thesc - ...was the Islamic one. Generally having been implemented at an average rate of 5-10% which is far less than upper tax band of the UK, and places like Denmark which requres 40-50% tax. Can you imagine 50% tax?
Islam preys upon the criminals or the unfortunate angry man like Malcolm X or crazy Mike Tyson who accepts Islam. Reasonable and smart educated Americans are not accepting Islam.
And yes I slam was spread by sword. All the Kashmiris were forced to accept Islam. Africans in Sahara were forced to accept Islam.
Most of the Indian muslims accpeted Islam because they were forced or they were tired of stupid hindu caste system as they were untouchables.
you are a sick minded racist ,who think those people are inferior than white rich people .you cannt count how many famous people have converted.its not the point but problem is your thinking,prapoganda you come up with,i am sure you are friend of racist people like INVESTIGATE ISLAM ,JESUS FREEK,VENOMFANGX ETC,.FOLLOWER OF ROBERT SPINCER ,OR PERHAPS YOU ARE ONE OF THEM WITH DIFFERENT ID.
IN SIGHT OF GOD EVEYONE IS EQUALL ,POOR ,RICH ,BLACK OR WHITE SO PLEASE YOUR CLAIMS ARE BASLESS.GOD BLESS AL
You can attack me but you cannot deny the truth. I agree with you all men are equal.
I think you did not get my point.
If you convert an unfortunate angry man like Malcolm X what do you end up with. An angry man. When Mr Malcolm X realized that he was killed by the nation of Islam. The whole Islamic movement for civil right brought death and destruction.
On the other hand non violent approach by Martin Luther king saved America and served humanity.
@bhazarik saved america? lool u got the highest rate of rape and sodomy and bestiality and incest and homosexuality and satanism and all that!! wtf r u talkin bout saved america?! get out of ur cocoon and live in the real world kid!! pshhh "saved america" lmao
lolz u r so stupid, rnt d holly wood people r son and daughters of same criminals, education didnt mean changing of a sect,dey remain same no matr how educated dey r, real kings and ellite r arabs with a strong history and bakground, late in 600 AD's, arabs were v rich in culture, family bakgrounds and so. stil muslim r richeer then any 1 in d world as far as sources r concern, r u a hindu? if yes then u shldbt b talikin lyk ds in frnt of ur master, as v ruled u over 1000 yrs, u bloody slave
all indian muslims are descedents of slave hindus n buddhists who converted to islam to get freedom from thr muslims owners,pakistan is country formed specially 4 slaves,slave republic of pakistan,r u pakistani?then u scum shud no tht we hindus ruled u pakistanis 4 5000 years b4 islam came u scum and then u became slaves of invading muslims forgot the muaryas,the kushans,thesungas,theguptas we gave u a culture u scum
@thescorpionking - You have literally no idea what you are talking about are you? Its funny though that you admit that the Hindus did rule what is now modern Afghanistan and lower Iran. The people resented the rules of the Hindus hence like in other times of history they rose up.
People such as yourself are pathetic, you talk about Aurengzeb a man who killed his own father what does he have to do with Religion.
You Pakis and Indians are all the same dumb as hell!
dude timur invaded india in 1398 and executed more 100000 hindus in 1day 4 absoultely no reason and joyfully wrote of his genocide of hindus in his texts,the hindukush mountains mean hindu slaughter in persian,u muslims deby the crimes commmited by ur co-religionists in the previous centuries to spread ur evil religion of islam,shut the fuck up evryone knows islam ws spread by d sword when mohammad sent lettors inviting various kings to islam.the persian king tore it apart n then jihad on iran
dude muslims destroyed buddhism in india,afghanistan,pakistan,nalanda vikramshila all universitites wer destroyed by muslims,india's poverty n illiteracy are a legacy of islamic rule and india is still sufferin from it,anyways the desedents of mughals r pulling rickshaws in hyderbad and bahadur shah zafar's granddaughter is a prostitue in calcutta paying for the crimes committed by thr ancestors,islam is a vicious ideology,go n search people executed 4 refusin to convert 2 islam on google
Muhammad Ghori committed genocide against Hindus at Kol (modern Aligarh), Kalinjar and Varanasi, according to Hasan Nizami's Taj-ul-Maasir, 20,000 Hindu prisoners were slaughtered and their heads offered to crows
The Sultan's army was easily defeated on December 17, 1398. Timur entered Delhi and the city was sacked, destroyed, and left in ruins. Before the battle for Delhi, Timur executed more than 100,000 captives.
Timur himself recorded the invasions in his memoirs, collectively known as Tuzk-i-Timuri.[22] In them, he vividly described the massacre at Delhi:
In a short space of time all the people in the [Delhi] fort were put to the sword, and in the course of 1 hour d heads of 10,000 infidels were cut off. The sword of Islam was washed in the blood of the infidels, and all the goods and effects, the treasure n d grain wich for many a long year had been stored in the fort became the spoil of my soldiers.
They set fire to the houses and reduced them to ashes, and they razed the buildings and the fort to the ground....All these infidel Hindus were slain, their women and children, and their property and goods became the spoil of the victors, proclaimed throughout the camp that every man who had infidel prisoners should put them to death, and whoever neglected to do so should himself be executed and his property given to the informer.
When this order became known to the ghazis of Islam, they drew their swords and put their prisoners to death.One hundred thousand infidels, impious idolators, were on that day slain.
Maulana Nasiruddin Umar, a counselor and man of learning, who, in all his life, had never killed a sparrow, now, in execution of my order, slew with his sword fifteen idolatrous Hindus, who were his captives....on the great day of battle these 100,000 prisoners could not be left with the baggage, and that it would be entirely opposed to the rules of war to set these idolaters and enemies of Islam at liberty...no other course remained but that of making them all food for the sword
well dude go out persecution of hindus perseution of zoroastrians if i cud go back in time islam is dangerous ideology,wat stupid arguemnt r u making,people rising against hindu rule,hav ya lost ur mind,the infidel ancestors of afghan people put a brave and heroic resistance in the battle fo kabul in 980 AD,and were beaten by deciet and in 2 centuries they wer all slaughtered n forced to convert to islam,stop this bullshit abt people rising against hindu rule wat crap makes me laugh
be careful??? i don't know who you think you are addressing, but you can kiss my butt. you don't order anyone but your wives around,,, and i'm not your buddy.
that lame old tired argument has been answered a thousand times cubed, dude. "peter, who do you say that I am? thought art the Christ, the Son of the Living God. flesh and blood has not revealed that to you, but MY Father in heaven." and thomas fell at His feet, saying "my Lord and my God." Jesus didn't rebuke him. get better arguments
now thats idol worship bow to a man and if you call him God then how could he die and who was running the universe for 3days 3 nights according to christians hey why dont you rewrite an other version of bible then come and tell to bow to whom ever you want .
great lecture, may Allah shows right path to ignorants
MrFkhan786 2 months ago
I would like to add to u r point mr naik that a UN survey report's tell that 90% of non muslim people's those who convert to islam revert back to there original religion in less then 3 year's
amanvds 11 months ago
My dear Dr naik u just said that spreading of slam by sword is a mith, Then can u tell me why was Khalsa panth established by guru govind singh ji in year 1699 AD
Khalsa panth was established in order to fight against the muslim ruler's who forcefully converted hindu's to islam
Entire Sikh history is the proof of the fact that islam was spreaded forcefully
In shree guru granth sahid ji (sacred book of Sikhism) It is mentioned at several places the brutality of muslim people
amanvds 11 months ago
@zxcvbnm7644 Have you even been listening to Zakir, violence was never a factor when Islam spread, It was just muslim people emigrating and spreading Islam peacefully, there is 138 million Indian Muslims! India is just a BIG country to convert. Islam spread peacefully to all corners of the earth, like it or not Islam will be dominant.
TheIslamicWarrior 1 year ago
Dr. Naik said:If Muslims wanted to convert all the Hindus in India we could have done it.
THIS IS A LIE
Mughal Emperors did want to convert everyone in India to Islam.
Emperor Jahangir specifically warned his nobles that they "should force Islam on anyone."
Look up the Mughal Emperor Aurangzeb. his policy of temple destruction, his prohibition on music, his demolition of Christian settlements, and his enslavement of Christian converts.
Dr. Naik is a liar and I caught him in the act.
teamsigned 1 year ago 2
india z a country of CUM HUNGRY SLAVES, EVRY 1 CAN FUK UR MOTHR LAND AND TAKE HIS RIGHT AFTR KIKING UR BLAK ASS like PAKIS did!
smtmeer 2 years ago
@smtmeer do you speak to you're mother with that tongue?
TheIslamicWarrior 1 year ago
And bdw d 1st indian empire is round abt 500 bc, and it makes aprox 1000 yrs b4 islam! ur maurya empire came in2 being aftr ALexendr d gr8 and Aryan invaders. it means hindus wr again slaves to dem! ds reflects dat hindus have brain whch accepts slavry vry easily in front of their superiors, bt in front of muslims no 1 stands, caz they know how 2 take their right 4rm evils and how 2 defeat dem!
smtmeer 2 years ago
u r such a pee brain, how can u say dat u ruled pakis only, as pak wz nt there at dat tym and 2ndly d Maurya empire wz more dominent in present india den in present paki, there wz no power ful religion at dat tym so dats y maurya empire wz extensive, but yes ds z true dat muslims ruled over u 4 yrs, and u were fuking slaves 2 us!
smtmeer 2 years ago
@the scorpion king
of course this is true that pakistani and indian cultures were same before islam, and wat culture hindus had and have? d stupid of all ! praying d fuking stones refined by ur own hands? haha, wat a culture, and dat drinking d pea of ur cow mother, hilarious!
smtmeer 2 years ago
@jarmen - Really is that why Lebanon is 50% Christian, or is that why the Yazedi population has only grown over the past 13 mellenians and the only time it has shrunk is during the current Iraq war. Also is that why the Indian always remained a Hindu majority.
Also explain to me why the most populus country in the world Indonesia is Muslim without a single Muslim army ever having been there?
Also how about the Uighurs in China which Muslim army converted them?
How about being objective
kikusdream 2 years ago
dude go n read about timur's conquest of india,100000 hindus wer executed in 1 day,go n read about mahmud of ghazni's destruction of somnath temple.50000 hindus died defendin it and mahmud ordered killin of all incudin women and children 500000 people died 40000 wer taken as slaves n sold in arabian markets,akbar ordered execution of 30000 rajputs,auarngzeb ordered execution of 10000 jats,mohammad bin qasim killed mroe than 100000 people in his conquest of sindh and u say islam is peace fuck u
thescorpionking2010 2 years ago
go n read baout the heroic resistance of the infidel ancestors of the afghan people who wer defeated by deciet in the battle of kabul in 980 when muslims armies attacked the hindu n buddhist afghan army in the middle of the night dressed as hindu brahmins,go n search haqiqat rai a 12 yr odl hindu boy who ws executed 4 balspheming the prophet but refused to convert to islam,guru tegh bahadur boiled alive 4 nt converting,7 n 8 yr odl son of guru gobins singh buried alive 4 nt converting
thescorpionking2010 2 years ago
guru tegh bahadur beheaded in chandni chowk 4 nt converting,today thr r no pre islamic arab polythiests,christians and jews left in saudi arabia whr r they?whr r the zoroastrians of iran?40000 of them wer slaughtered in 1 day by invading arab muslims,go n read abt the spread of islam in iran spread by the sword,nalanda university ws destroyed by muslims and all 100000 buddhist n hindu monks wer burned alive,no wonder nt even a single university ws opened in india during islamic rule
thescorpionking2010 2 years ago
guru arjun dev executed 4 nt converting,go n search banda singh bahadur and how he ws tortured but nevr converted to evil islam
thescorpionking2010 2 years ago
@thescorpionking - What the hell are you talking about? Who did Timur attack in India, it was the Delhi Sultanate themelves being Muslim. How about you actually read real historical aspect and diffrenciate between religious conquests and just conquests themselves. Timur fought more Muslims than non-muslims.
And Mahmud Ghazni was attacked by Jayapala with the help of the Rajput confederacy. Who wouldn't retaliate, again what does this have to do with religion though?
kikusdream 2 years ago
mahmud of ghazni committed genocide of hindus and tht has nuthin gt to do with religion wow,he glorified his genocide of hindus in his books and looted various temples enslaved women and children wich is absolutely allowed in islam
thescorpionking2010 2 years ago
@thescorpion - Well thank you for swearing at me that really you puts you in higher regard during a discussion. Secondly you have avoided the whole point of my post. Timur attacked the Delhi Sultanate as you admit, a Muslim kingdom. Thus what does he have to do with Religion?
With Ghazni it was the same it was not a conquest of Religion but of materialism but like stated and recorded by hisotry the conflict was instigated by the Hindu King Jayapal.
kikusdream 2 years ago
@kikusdream
timur attacked delhi sulatanate coz they were 2 linient on thr non muslim subjects and when he came he killed and committed genocide of hindus for absoklutely no reason
thescorpionking2010 2 years ago
@thescorpionking - You keep on changing your story not for the purposes of historical verification but rather for a round of Islam bashing. Timur attacked the Delhi Sultanate because of the reason that starts any other war in most cases money and conquest no other reason. He didn't care how the Delhi sultanate treated their subjects because he didn't care about Sultanate itself. You say I should not make a mockery of the people who were killed but the reality is you want to rewrite history...
kikusdream 2 years ago
@thescorpion - ...history so that it suits your specific position. In fact there is not even a consensus among the hostorians about whether he even watned to rule India or not.
Also how convnient is it to say that the Hindu empires which existed were not actually not the result of hindu teaching, that is unnatural. All ancient Kings used religion as a rallying point for their troops. Thus the Nanda, or Maymar empires all used Hinduism as a driving force when conquering foreign lands.
kikusdream 2 years ago
@thescopion - Also please don't list to me Sikh gurus, I was born a Sikh. However unlike you I learned that that suffering that those people caused upon rightous men was not due to Islam but rather their own incompetence. Like I mentioned earlier Aurengzeb was more than willing to kill his father a disgusting person like that has no place in any religion.
kikusdream 2 years ago
@kikusdream
Shah Jahan's style of organizing enslavement campaigns is illustrative of the Mughal strategy to rally religious and political forces behind what essentially was a move for acquisition of valuable human and biological resources.
thescorpionking2010 2 years ago
in 1632 Shah Jahan ordered all recently constructed or partially-constructed Hindu temples obliterated. Seventy-six temples were destroyed in Benares n 10000 inhabitants wer executed by being "blown up with powder, drowned in water or burnt by fire". As a result of this campaign, 4000 were taken captive to Agra where they were tortured to try to convert them to Islam. Only a few apostatised; the remainder were trampled to death by elephants, except for the younger women who went to harems
thescorpionking2010 2 years ago
@thescorpion - Then you go on to say that the only legacy of the Muslims is illiteracy wow...what an arbitrary and one sided statement you cite Spain as an example, well I don't know which publication you use for your history but if you read any good History book (such as those published by Oxford Publishing house etc) you'll see that there is a universal consensus among scholars and hostorians that the Golden age of Spain was under Muslim rule, Alhambara was world renowned...Cnt
kikusdream 2 years ago
@kikusdream
ddude dont say bullshit aurangzeb and shahjahn belonged to the same class of hienious human beings,shah jahan killed n blinded his brothers to become king and auragzeb did tht to his own brothers he nevr killed shah jahan put him in solitery confinement for 8 years b4 he dies,it ws under shah jahan tht 76 tempels wer destroyed and hindus wer sold in slave markets and hidnu women had to specifically be sold to only muslim merchants
thescorpionking2010 2 years ago
@kikusdream
Abd Allah Khan Firuz Jang, an Uzbek noble at the Mughal court during the 1620s and 1630s, was appointed to the position of governor of the regions of Kalpi and Kher and, in the process of subjugating the local rebels, ``beheaded the leaders and enslaved their women, daughters and children, who were more than 2 lacks [200,000] in number
thescorpionking2010 2 years ago
@kikusdream
When Shah Shuja was appointed as governor of Kabul he carried on a ruthless war in the Hindu territory beyond Indus. Most of the women burnt themselves to death to save their honour. Those captured were distributed among Muslim Mansabdars.Under Shah Jahan, peasants wer compelled 2 sell their women n children to meet thr revenue requirements. d peasants wer carried off 2 various markets d fairs 2 b sold wth thr poor unhappy wives carrying their small children crying and lamenting.
thescorpionking2010 2 years ago
slave of the Ghurid Sultan Muizz u-Din, Qutb-ud-din Aybak (r. 1206-10 as the first of the Shamsi slave-kings) invaded Gujarat in 1197 and placed some 20,000 people in bondage. Roughly six years later, he enslaved an additional 50,000 people during his conquest of Kalinjar. Later in the 13th century, Balban's campaign in Ranthambore, reportedly defeated the Hindu army and yielded "captives beyond computation"
thescorpionking2010 2 years ago
@kikusdream
Zia uddin Barani suggested that Sultan Alauddin Khilji owned 50,000 slave-boys, in addition to 70,000 construction slaves. Sultan Firuz Shah Tughluq is said to have owned 180,000 slaves, roughly 12,000 of whom were skilled artisans.[45][46][47][48][49][50] A significant proportion of slaves owned by the Sultans were likely to have been military slaves and not labourers or domestics
thescorpionking2010 2 years ago
@thescorpion - Also I am not talking about Muslim historians and academics but rather Western ones.
In fact Noah Feldman the law professor (a practicing Jew) from Harvard University and a fellow at Yale said that Shari'a at the time of its inception granted more legal rights to minorities and women than any other legal system out there, and in fact that when common law was surplanted it, it actually eroded the rights of the individual.
In india literacy and the Arts flourished...
kikusdream 2 years ago
@kikusdream
The Kesava Deo temple in Mathura, marked the place that Hindus believe was the birth place of Shri Krishna.[29] In 1661 Aurangzeb ordered the demolition of the temple, and constructed the Katra Masjid mosque. Traces of the ancient Hindu temple can be seen from the back of the mosque. Aurangzeb also destroyed what was the most famous temple in Varanasi- the Vishwanath Temple
thescorpionking2010 2 years ago
@thescorpion - ...cnt. Under most of the Moghul rule, I suggest you go to the Pergamom Museum in Berlin germany to see the permanent exhibition of South Asian Art.
I am not saying Muslim rule however was a perfect just like any other empire it had deep fisures but not due religion but rather the falibility of man.
Also you keep on talking about Islam as some sort of unified entity, well let me tell you there are over 73 sects each with their own theology and dogma out of them all only one...
kikusdream 2 years ago
@kikusdream
Aurangzeb banned Diwali, placed a jizya (tax) on non-Muslims and martyred the ninth Sikh guru Tegh Bahadur.[28]
During his reign, tens of thousands of temples were desecrated: their facades and interiors were defaced and their murtis (divine images) looted.[28] In many cases, temples were destroyed entirely; in numerous instances mosques were built on their foundations, sometimes using the same stones.
thescorpionking2010 2 years ago
@thescorpion - cntd. sect teaches violence. Whabism, all these terrorist orginizations such as Al-Qaeda and Taliban are Wahabi a sect which came about only a hundred or so years ago. They are like the Christian Lord's Resistance Army in Uganda a twisted orginization which draw no distninction between muslim and non-muslims hence they have killed more muslims than non-muslim.
Have you ever heard of any Ahmadi, Aga Khani, Sufi, Dervish, Maliki Muslims and so forth ever wanting to blow...
kikusdream 2 years ago
@kikusdream
sikander bustikhan of kashmir ordered all golden and silver images to be broken down and they used to be stepping stones of mosques,idoltary ws banned and 24000 hindu kashmiri brahmins wer executed when they refused to accept the order,rest of them wer boiled alive and those who conevrted wer spared,,under the tughlaq empire 22 brahmins wer executed for sayni tht hinduism and islam are equal,in haryana 5000 people wer executed for erecting image of a locla diety
thescorpionking2010 2 years ago
@thesc - to blow themselves up? No! Because the reality is contrary to you you believe Islam does not teach the killing of 'Infidel' as you call them.
I suggest you look into other sects and as to what they preach rather than just specfically seeking out contention for your own personal benefit.
kikusdream 2 years ago
@kikusdream
dude u deny the fact tht muslims ever persecuted hindus and tried to convert them at the point of sword,evryone knows tht even the pakistanis wud accept it,destroyed temples,universitites,nalanda,vikramshilawer all destroyed by a muslims and nt even a single college or university opened in india during evil muslim rule,thr is a mosque at the place where krishna ws born,aurangzeb banned diwali and jizya ws implemented on hindus
thescorpionking2010 2 years ago
Writer Fernand Braudel wrote in A History of Civilizations (Penguin 1988/1963, p. 232-236), Islamic rule in India as a "colonial experiment" was "extremely violent", and "the Muslims could not rule the country except by systematic terror. Cruelty was the norm burnings, summary executions, crucifixions or impalements, inventive tortures.
thescorpionking2010 2 years ago
@kikusdream
Hindu temples were destroyed to make way for mosques. On occasion there were forced conversions. If ever there were an uprising, it was instantly and savagely repressed: houses were burned, the countryside was laid waste, men were slaughtered and women were taken as slaves
thescorpionking2010 2 years ago
@thesc - Firstly thank you for copying and pasting half of wikipedia, and second of all you still haven't answered anything I have said. You keep on refering to Aurengzeb and the Mughals and being some sort of religious authority of Islam. In fact in technicality these people had no jurisdictions as Islam does not recognize monarchies as a proper form of government.
Also you admit to the fact that Aurengzeb and his predecessors killed each other to attain power, there is no religious...
kikusdream 2 years ago
@thesc - *cntd* attributes in their actions. Those people were the epitomy of materialism. Just like all other monarchs around the world have been. I follow the likes of Khan Abdul Ghaffar Khan a true devout Muslim who reflected the true teachings of Islam. He was a man whose convictions reflected Islam in its essence.
Also you keep on refering to Sikh gurus, but Sikhism's Granth is full of Muslim hymns along with Hindu ones. Also they repelled Mughal advances just as much as Hindu Rajput ones
kikusdream 2 years ago
@kikusdream
king jaypal did nt go to ghazni to kill mahmud,he wanted to take revenge for his father death at his hands,wat had the somanth temple and its peaceful inhabtanta gt to do with it,what had kesava dao temple got to do with it,what had those 50000 hindus who dies defendin got to do with it,coz islam says tht killin infidels is allows and tkain thr womne as slaves is allowed sum beautiful things tht islam teaches
thescorpionking2010 2 years ago
@thescorpion - You might like to perceive that history is linear but that is not the case, it is influenced by its enviorment which includes politics. So you recounting historical fights for your own personal opinion highlights your own ignorance towards it.
The same applied to Hindu empires, why did Ashoka become a Budhist in the first place? It was because he saw the destruction his Hindu forces had caused and the severe suffering. So do not tell me that Hindus are some sort of peace train!
kikusdream 2 years ago
@kikusdream
dude i nev said hindus r sum sort of peace trian ok i nevr said tht,ashoika becmae buddhist coz his army committed a genocide a kalinga war and when he sw all tht destruction he ws devasted and he accepted buddhism coz it gave him peace and more evr go n read he still continued to worship hindu gods and various of his inscriptions regard hindu brahmins highly,his grandosn reinstituted vedic relgiiona s the state religion,he spread buddhism worldwide with peace
thescorpionking2010 2 years ago
@thescorpion - The reality of the matter is that Empires, and Kings have fought and you assoicating their actions as some sort of relgiously sanctioned practice is pathetic. The Byzantine Christians were opposed by the Armenian Christians each according to your process must have been acting in accordance with their faith then?
It is obvious that Hindu empires were also opposed, they were no exception to any other empires you denying or thinking otherwise changes nothing.
kikusdream 2 years ago
@kikusdream
c dude u r gettin it all wrong c its fien i no u will try to defend ur faith nuthin wrong with tht,but wat i m sayin thth muslims in the midieval era wud attack the civilian population of conquered regimes destroy universities temples,force people to convert thts wat happened in kashmir and today it is 95% muslim bcoz ur quran says so it legalizes slave trade and sexual relationships with female slaves this is evil and muslims did alll thth coz islam teaches tht
thescorpionking2010 2 years ago
@thescorpion - Also people like yourself always try to convey that oh that 'Hinduism' was not spread with the sword and was somehow present in the South Asia and the Sub-continent through magic, how about you highlight empires such as the Magdha, the Nanda Empire, and than the Maurya empire which conquered the Nanda and then expanded westwards into modern Afghanistan and southern Iran, and later the expansion was Soutwards.
Lets not be bias.
kikusdream 2 years ago
@kikusdream
and dude u r tryin tht hinduism ws spread by the sword ok first go n read how hinduism came,it comes from an indo aryan vedic cultutre not founded by any person,tht ws the same in ancient iran,afghanistan,pakistan,they used to worship various gods iranian prophet zoroaster rejected thth religion and zoroastrianism was born,later on this indo aryna culture became the vedic religion arnd 3000 bc with composition of vedas and then the mixture of buddhism,vedic religion became hinduism
thescorpionking2010 2 years ago
@kikusdream
dude nt once in history did indians go to any other n try to conquer it and convert its people by the sword ok dotn compare ur evil islam spreadin by thes word killing millions of people in its way to hinduism or spread of buddhism they wer spread peacefully,hinduism in afghanistan is as old as hinduism itself,and afghnistan ws always ruled by sum hindu-buddhist dyansties or zoroastrian persians,ok hindu brahmins too k vedas to south asia,south east asia
thescorpionking2010 2 years ago
@kikusdream
hinduism is nt a defined religion it comes from the vedas but the way a south indian practices hinduism may be much different form tht of a north indian,they hav different sets of dieties sharin sum though but the only common fact are the vedas,upanishads and bhagavad gtia and different hindus percieve them differently,it s a personal choice,hinduism means belief of people living on other side of indus valley it snt an organized religionlik islam or christianity
thescorpionking2010 2 years ago
@kikusdream
dude u cn try defendin islam or watever u want but just dont make mockery of those people who died but didi nt conevrt to ur evil religion,go n search banda singh bahadur,guru tegh bahadur,guru arjun dev,guru gobind singh 7 n 8 year old sons,haqiqat rai,rani durgavati,shamabha ji they all died humilitaing deaths at the hands of muslims 4 refusin to convert to ur religion fo peace,hindu kush mountains means hindu slaughter where millions of hindus died
thescorpionking2010 2 years ago
@kikusdream
ddue when maratahs,rajputs,sikhs defeated muslim empires nt once do we see there armies destroyon mosques,implementing taxes on muslim populations,attackin civiliains or muslim women burning themselves in fire in order to prevent converting to hinduism,nt once in india di we see this duringmuslim rule all this happened millions of people slaughtered nt even a single university or college ws opened to promote education,most of the times busy tryin to gain converts nuthin else
thescorpionking2010 2 years ago
@thescorpionking2010
india's poverty,illiteracy are legacy of islamic rule in india,thts y muslims wer kciked out of spain and thts wat needs to be done to them in india,in all world conflicts todays muslims are involved,muslims go otu n bomb themselves killing inncoent womena dn children,earlier u used swords to terrorze people nt the bombs,muslims plundered n looted india much more than the british at least the birtish did nt force ny1 at the point of sword to convert to christianity
thescorpionking2010 2 years ago
@thesc - You then continue to talk about jiziya as most people trying to prepetuate a myth. Well let me tell you something simple, the tax system of the time asked muslims to pay more and also requred them to serve withing the national service. The zakat was always higher than the jizya, and like everything else it is given a negativee connatation on purpose.
Do countries not levy taxes nowadays? Every empire has had a tax system, and out of them all one of the lowest and fairest has been...
kikusdream 2 years ago
@kikusdream
Mahmud of Ghazni was an Afghan Sultan who invaded the Indian subcontinent during the early 11th century. His campaigns across the gangetic plains are often cited for their iconoclastic plundering and destruction of temples such as those at Mathura and he looked upon their destruction as an act of "jihad"
thescorpionking2010 2 years ago
@kikusdream Mahmud's invasion as one in which he put "thousands of Hindus to the sword" and made a pastime of "raising pyramids of the skulls of the Hindus".
thescorpionking2010 2 years ago
@kikusdream
Muhammad Ghori committed genocide against Hindus at Kol (modern Aligarh), Kalinjar and Varanasi, according to Hasan Nizami's Taj-ul-Maasir, 20,000 Hindu prisoners were slaughtered and their heads offered to crows
thescorpionking2010 2 years ago
@kikusdream
Historical records compiled by Muslim historian Maulana Hakim Saiyid Abdul Hai attest to the iconoclasm of Qutb-ud-din Aybak. The first mosque built in Delhi, the "Quwwat al-Islam" was built after the demolition of the Hindu temple built previously by Prithvi Raj and certain parts of the temple were left outside the mosque proper.
thescorpionking2010 2 years ago
@kikusdream
Firuz Shah Tughluq was the third ruler of the Tughlaq dynasty of the Delhi Sultanate. The "Tarikh-i-Firuz Shah" is a historical record written during his reign that attests to the systematic persecution of Hindus under his rule.[27] In particular, it records atrocities committed against Hindu Brahmin priests who refused to convert to Islam
thescorpionking2010 2 years ago
@kikusdream
An order ws accordingly given 2 d Brahman n was brought before Sultan. d true faith ws declared 2 d Brahman nd d right course pointed out. but he refused 2 accept it. A pile was risen on which the Kaffir with his hands nd legs tied ws thrown in2 nd d wooden tablet on d top
d pile was lit at 2 places his head nd his feet. d fire first reached him in the feet and drew from him a cry and then fire completely enveloped him. Behold Sultan for his strict adherence to law and rectitude
thescorpionking2010 2 years ago
@thesc - So contrary to what you might light to think History (like mentioned earlier) is not linear or apolitical events and individuals form the outcome of what is now called history. You don't know what was going on 1000 years ago you weren't there, and thus looking at history through bias and flawed inference will give an outcome whic in itself is flawed.
Also you totally have ignored my comments on Tax and indication of what Prof. Noah Feldman (Harvard) has said, but rather only have...
kikusdream 2 years ago
@thesc - *cntd* espoused you own view. A conversation is not the slinging of accusations but rather a civilized discourse which needs to be approached from a neutral perspective.
kikusdream 2 years ago
@thesc - ...was the Islamic one. Generally having been implemented at an average rate of 5-10% which is far less than upper tax band of the UK, and places like Denmark which requres 40-50% tax. Can you imagine 50% tax?
kikusdream 2 years ago
at least they don't worship animals
MrJEWWATCH 2 years ago
u got and fuk ur 2days bible hard core and suk ur own juice, then suks ur pops juice, u son of christian cum hungry bitch !
smtmeer 2 years ago
Islam preys upon the criminals or the unfortunate angry man like Malcolm X or crazy Mike Tyson who accepts Islam. Reasonable and smart educated Americans are not accepting Islam.
And yes I slam was spread by sword. All the Kashmiris were forced to accept Islam. Africans in Sahara were forced to accept Islam.
Most of the Indian muslims accpeted Islam because they were forced or they were tired of stupid hindu caste system as they were untouchables.
bhazarik 3 years ago
Well what Mr. Zakir Naik does not tell you, who are these Americans, that are converting to Islam.
Criminals in jails, angry and proverty stricken (usually black) people are getting converted to Islam in United States.
The most educated class, or the liberal elites of Hollywood or greenwich connecticut are getting accepting Buddhism if at all not Islam.
bhazarik 3 years ago
you are a sick minded racist ,who think those people are inferior than white rich people .you cannt count how many famous people have converted.its not the point but problem is your thinking,prapoganda you come up with,i am sure you are friend of racist people like INVESTIGATE ISLAM ,JESUS FREEK,VENOMFANGX ETC,.FOLLOWER OF ROBERT SPINCER ,OR PERHAPS YOU ARE ONE OF THEM WITH DIFFERENT ID.
IN SIGHT OF GOD EVEYONE IS EQUALL ,POOR ,RICH ,BLACK OR WHITE SO PLEASE YOUR CLAIMS ARE BASLESS.GOD BLESS AL
bhalwalx2 3 years ago
You can attack me but you cannot deny the truth. I agree with you all men are equal.
I think you did not get my point.
If you convert an unfortunate angry man like Malcolm X what do you end up with. An angry man. When Mr Malcolm X realized that he was killed by the nation of Islam. The whole Islamic movement for civil right brought death and destruction.
On the other hand non violent approach by Martin Luther king saved America and served humanity.
bhazarik 3 years ago
malcolm x was killed because he converted out of the nation of islam after he went to hajj...maybe you should open a book
lox786 2 years ago
@bhazarik saved america? lool u got the highest rate of rape and sodomy and bestiality and incest and homosexuality and satanism and all that!! wtf r u talkin bout saved america?! get out of ur cocoon and live in the real world kid!! pshhh "saved america" lmao
kratos0987 1 year ago
@bhalwalx2 The Race card again? Where was he racist? How dumb. Cheap attempt at the race card, moron.
vipernajem 1 year ago
lolz u r so stupid, rnt d holly wood people r son and daughters of same criminals, education didnt mean changing of a sect,dey remain same no matr how educated dey r, real kings and ellite r arabs with a strong history and bakground, late in 600 AD's, arabs were v rich in culture, family bakgrounds and so. stil muslim r richeer then any 1 in d world as far as sources r concern, r u a hindu? if yes then u shldbt b talikin lyk ds in frnt of ur master, as v ruled u over 1000 yrs, u bloody slave
smtmeer 2 years ago
all indian muslims are descedents of slave hindus n buddhists who converted to islam to get freedom from thr muslims owners,pakistan is country formed specially 4 slaves,slave republic of pakistan,r u pakistani?then u scum shud no tht we hindus ruled u pakistanis 4 5000 years b4 islam came u scum and then u became slaves of invading muslims forgot the muaryas,the kushans,thesungas,theguptas we gave u a culture u scum
thescorpionking2010 2 years ago
@thescorpionking - You have literally no idea what you are talking about are you? Its funny though that you admit that the Hindus did rule what is now modern Afghanistan and lower Iran. The people resented the rules of the Hindus hence like in other times of history they rose up.
People such as yourself are pathetic, you talk about Aurengzeb a man who killed his own father what does he have to do with Religion.
You Pakis and Indians are all the same dumb as hell!
kikusdream 2 years ago
dude timur invaded india in 1398 and executed more 100000 hindus in 1day 4 absoultely no reason and joyfully wrote of his genocide of hindus in his texts,the hindukush mountains mean hindu slaughter in persian,u muslims deby the crimes commmited by ur co-religionists in the previous centuries to spread ur evil religion of islam,shut the fuck up evryone knows islam ws spread by d sword when mohammad sent lettors inviting various kings to islam.the persian king tore it apart n then jihad on iran
thescorpionking2010 2 years ago
dude muslims destroyed buddhism in india,afghanistan,pakistan,nalanda vikramshila all universitites wer destroyed by muslims,india's poverty n illiteracy are a legacy of islamic rule and india is still sufferin from it,anyways the desedents of mughals r pulling rickshaws in hyderbad and bahadur shah zafar's granddaughter is a prostitue in calcutta paying for the crimes committed by thr ancestors,islam is a vicious ideology,go n search people executed 4 refusin to convert 2 islam on google
thescorpionking2010 2 years ago
Muhammad Ghori committed genocide against Hindus at Kol (modern Aligarh), Kalinjar and Varanasi, according to Hasan Nizami's Taj-ul-Maasir, 20,000 Hindu prisoners were slaughtered and their heads offered to crows
thescorpionking2010 2 years ago
The Sultan's army was easily defeated on December 17, 1398. Timur entered Delhi and the city was sacked, destroyed, and left in ruins. Before the battle for Delhi, Timur executed more than 100,000 captives.
thescorpionking2010 2 years ago
Timur himself recorded the invasions in his memoirs, collectively known as Tuzk-i-Timuri.[22] In them, he vividly described the massacre at Delhi:
In a short space of time all the people in the [Delhi] fort were put to the sword, and in the course of 1 hour d heads of 10,000 infidels were cut off. The sword of Islam was washed in the blood of the infidels, and all the goods and effects, the treasure n d grain wich for many a long year had been stored in the fort became the spoil of my soldiers.
thescorpionking2010 2 years ago
They set fire to the houses and reduced them to ashes, and they razed the buildings and the fort to the ground....All these infidel Hindus were slain, their women and children, and their property and goods became the spoil of the victors, proclaimed throughout the camp that every man who had infidel prisoners should put them to death, and whoever neglected to do so should himself be executed and his property given to the informer.
thescorpionking2010 2 years ago
When this order became known to the ghazis of Islam, they drew their swords and put their prisoners to death.One hundred thousand infidels, impious idolators, were on that day slain.
thescorpionking2010 2 years ago
Maulana Nasiruddin Umar, a counselor and man of learning, who, in all his life, had never killed a sparrow, now, in execution of my order, slew with his sword fifteen idolatrous Hindus, who were his captives....on the great day of battle these 100,000 prisoners could not be left with the baggage, and that it would be entirely opposed to the rules of war to set these idolaters and enemies of Islam at liberty...no other course remained but that of making them all food for the sword
thescorpionking2010 2 years ago
@thescorpion - Also when you spew out arbitrary no. how about rather than espousing them actually backing them up with respected sources.
kikusdream 2 years ago
well dude go out persecution of hindus perseution of zoroastrians if i cud go back in time islam is dangerous ideology,wat stupid arguemnt r u making,people rising against hindu rule,hav ya lost ur mind,the infidel ancestors of afghan people put a brave and heroic resistance in the battle fo kabul in 980 AD,and were beaten by deciet and in 2 centuries they wer all slaughtered n forced to convert to islam,stop this bullshit abt people rising against hindu rule wat crap makes me laugh
thescorpionking2010 2 years ago
be careful??? i don't know who you think you are addressing, but you can kiss my butt. you don't order anyone but your wives around,,, and i'm not your buddy.
that lame old tired argument has been answered a thousand times cubed, dude. "peter, who do you say that I am? thought art the Christ, the Son of the Living God. flesh and blood has not revealed that to you, but MY Father in heaven." and thomas fell at His feet, saying "my Lord and my God." Jesus didn't rebuke him. get better arguments
opntheirhartzJesus 3 years ago
now thats idol worship bow to a man and if you call him God then how could he die and who was running the universe for 3days 3 nights according to christians hey why dont you rewrite an other version of bible then come and tell to bow to whom ever you want .
bhalwalx2 3 years ago