Dutch Controlled Demolition expert 9/11

[culturebully3]

what a load of crap

ItWasTyped. com for the TRUTH on conspiracy theories. Intelligent, rational thinking people welcome

[roquefortfiles]

Maybe next time the "TM" can show Mr Danny the video of B 7 coming down. But this time turn up the audio. And when he hears NOTHING!!!.. like nobody does hear anything. He'll pop the tape and toss it at the idiots who brought it.

Its a load of BS people. High explosives don't go off in a sound vacuum.

Take off your stupid hats!! all of you.

[zenithbeach]

i came across a good video for all the deniers, dont feel bad, its perfectly normal to deny it at first.. psychologists help 9/11 truth deniers:

/watch?v=mEGgAk1AbA4

but after 10 years its really time to re-examine what youve been told by your favorite brainwasher.. the media.

[khartoba]

"It has never received much attention. Danny Jawenko had never heard of it."

LMFAO!  It's amazing the amount of lies someone will tell "in the search for truth". Unless this guy has been living under a rock in his own industry, then it would be possible that he's never heard of WTC 7.

[raviept]

The thing is that the fact that the official story is not true does not imply that 9/11 was an inside job. There were many strange events that day, but i think that there are as many people that accept the official version as there are people that rush to the conclusion that was an inside job. Proofs are needed.

[asjemenouja]

I just read the shocking news that Danny Jawenko who testifies in this video that the WTC 7 collapse was a controlled demolition was killed in a car crash.

The official explanation: "his car suddenly accelerated, flew off the road and crashed into a tree"

wow. Coinicidence? This very much feels like a liquidation to me. One of many as you dive into it.

The people behind this, not worthy to be called people, animals is a better word, seem to go to any length to clear their path.

[Loudmouf84]

@asjemenouja Calling them animals is a compliment. Animals are beautiful creatures with no evil intent. Those who did this are better off being called demons, devils, satanists. Period.

[asjemenouja]

@Loudmouf84

I absolutely agree on that.

[Loudmouf84]

@asjemenouja Indeed. Thank you & God bless

[Theincredibleism]

Weet iemand waar dit vandaan komt? cool om dit eens in het nedelands te zien.. is dit ooit op tv gekomen?

[ruthsiln]

It’s way past time we take this country back from the criminal slime who really did 9/11 and are hard at work destroying the America of our forefathers

[LindaStevensBZ]

Ask the NYFD Chiefs who were there that day!

They ALL think the Demo CT is total BULLSH-T!

Sure it looks like an implosion, but that is the way a bldg can fall if it is on fire and the center was damaged.

THIIIIIINK!

[TimothyRaymond1]

If there were explosives planted in World Trade Center 7, they would have been heard from miles around and clearly recorded on tape. Watch any video of buildings being demolished with explosives and you will hear a series of very loud bangs throughout the buildings. There are no sounds of explosions recorded on tape from WTC 7. Correct me if I'm wrong.

[Tobacc0]

@TimothyRaymond1 Not really. The explosives you're probably thinking of are Hi-Ex military types used in bombs. Explosives are carefully gradated and assembled across a wide range of "push" velocities. Building demolition explosives are not of the "Ka-blam", instantaneous variety since they must avoid producing dangerous ballistic projectiles. This doesn't mean they produce less power, they simply "push" slower for longer over further distance.

[zanzabarify]

Get with the times geez! You dont need a team of experts or professionals to demolish buildings, all you need is some fires and then a building will logically collapse downwards nicely.

So if anyone has a derelict building they want to demolish. Dont waste youre money on demolition 'experts',

everyone knows just light it on fire and wait for the nice neat collapse, duh.

[fhab525]

its funny he didnt know it happened the same day , thats the reaction i get when i bring it up "what is building 7" .. the media didnt cover it that day as much and not once ever since... i guess in the history books our kids will read, building 7 never existed.

[log140]

a NEUTRAL DEMOLITION EXPERT stated this is CONTROLLED DEMOLITION!!!!

so what walks like a duck, looks like a duck .. is a duck!!!

100% CONTROLLED DEMOLITION!!! witch makes 911 AN INSIDE JOB!!!!

[pinball281]

9/11 conspiracy videos are flooded with SHILLS

I would spit in the face of the dirt cunts

[splendid1000]

@pinball281

prove it

[Choclu7]

“If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land, it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy” James Madison 

[lynnej1970]

my god their news wvn lies its september th 11th

[roquefortfiles]

I saw a documentary with FDNY and Engineers who were standing in front of B7 They heard not a sound. It simply dropped. And they had expected it to collapse. It had been burning all day and was horribly damaged. Carved out in fact from WTC debris. It was no surprise to FDNY that it went (and they said so).

And this dude lives in Holland? Big fucking deal. It may LOOK like a Controlled Demo. But it was not. And MANY people witnessed it and EXPECTED IT. So whats the big deal? 

[Tobacc0]

@roquefortfiles The Dutch have the top civil engineers in the world. Many, if not most, of the great civil projects around the world have been built by the Dutch, mostly on behalf of Shell or other oil companies. Since this video there's been other video showing clearly how the penthouse, sitting on the top of the building, collapses first. A few seconds before the rest of the building.

[roquefortfiles]

@Tobacc0 Great, terrific!! All I am saying is. the FDNY and structural engineers were standing in front of B7 and they all KNEW it was going to go. It was no big mystery or "revelation" to them. Its only on things like Youtube and endless conspiracy nonsense that this event took on such a cloak and dagger veneer. The building was horribly damaged and was expected to collapse. And that is from KEY personnel who were there that day. The head of the FDNY was standing in front when it went.

[splendid1000]

@roquefortfiles

there would have been evidence of local collapse

[dtroit2]

@Tobacc0 sigh. of of the 3 support columns is right in the middle. It was the first to fail. When it failed the remaining 2 columns had no chance to support the weight of the building.

The middle support column held up the penthouse portion of the building so when it failed gravity took care of the penthouse.

[voodoowichdoctor]

@dtroit2 purely due to gravity, I suppose a 300 ton section of one of the towers being thrown horozontally, HOR-I-ZON-TA-LLY and embedded in the american express building 400 feet away is also gravity.

[jonjo220]

They did it in plain view and got away with it. This blows my mind to realise this every other day. How come we all just shrug our shoulders at the blatant lies and media conditioning of the official story. Crazy times. The " emperors new clothes " story comes to mind

[RMPify]

Nutcase Geert Wilders and his zionist friends fuelling up the fire with his moron speech on Ground Zero, false war on Iraq, Afghanistan and now the zionist's wants too go on war on Iran. WAKE UP AMERICA your country is hijacked by evil forces wich origin lies in Israel.

[ThaGodWeCreate]

@RMPify you think i dont know this??? i tell people everyday that america lies to us and they really believe tha shit about democracy & freedom...its crazy as long as they have phones to buy and hamburgers to eat they jus dont see that they controlled lil labrats in a maze with no fuckin cheese at tha end. jus like we go to afghanistan in 2003 and now american suburbs have a dope problem...and oxycontin sales went through roof...this is not democracy, this is HELL...and america is tha devil

[perein03]

"the same day, are you sure, the same day?" He must be thinking wtf is goin on in America

[pyromaniaknl]

In building 7 was a high ranked FBI agent John o neil was he's name they wanted to get rid of him so they sended him to building 7 a few days before 9/11. U must see the documentairy "Who killed John 'o Neil" if u don't believe that 9/11 was a inside job after u watched it there must be something wrong with u.

[IndisputableAttitude]

Jews did 9/11.

Someone prove this wrong.

[pixman83]

@IndisputableAttitude Osama did 9/11.

Prove this wrong.

[IndisputableAttitude]

@pixman83

The FBI's most wanted listing for him doesn't mention that he's wanted for 9/11. Not "proof" but it makes you wonder. Besides, how did the jewish controlled media pin it on someone living in a cave in Afghanistan within a day or two after 9/11? They didn't even have the correct passenger lists.

Also, google "Odigo" that was the paging company that put out a message for all Israelis to not show up to work that day.

[pixman83]

@IndisputableAttitude Its not proof either way. Then again, the FBI also said "The evidence linking Al-Qaeda and Bin Laden to the attacks of September 11 is clear and irrefutable."

Forget days, the news latched onto Al-Qaeda with hours. Which was a logical starting position. What other terrorist group has declared war on the US, previously attacked the WTC, and routinely uses suicide bombers? Besides OBL later admitted it.

Then they missed ~130 jews that died on 9/11. tinyurlDOTcom/5bwx5f

[IndisputableAttitude]

@pixman83

Jews did 9/11. Get that in your head.

[pixman83]

@IndisputableAttitude Osama did 9/11. Get that in your head.

Trying using some actual data to make a point instead of using vague suppositions based on speculation and conjecture.

For instance, here are a few easily verifiable facts:

1. ~130 jews died on 9/11

2. The primary source of the rumor you so firmly believe in is Al-Manar

3. Al-Manar is the official TV station of Hezbollah

4. Al-Manar describes itself as "psychological warfare against the Zionist enemy"

5. Obvious bias = BS claims

[IndisputableAttitude]

@pixman83

OK, actual data:

Jews got on TV and said, "We were there to document the event". These were the dancing Israeli moving company. Youtube "Five Dancing Israelis" (Prior knowledge)

Odigo paging company sent out a text message to all Israelis telling them to get out of the WTC. Newspaper article is still there.

Israelis had a motivation to do it, Netanyahu said, "This is good for Israel"

And, the way it was used to justify a war against a country that had nothing to do with it. Iraq.

[Synthetrix]

@IndisputableAttitude All urban myth bullshit.

[MrAmbrister]

@Synthetrix hey pal......are you sure?

watch?v=Wzl3juBt2Z8

Watch and explain this "urban myth" bullshit. Please, correct us poor ignorant folk.

[foreverneil]

A few questions to everyone that believes the official story of 9/11:

Why do you bother to make an effort to try to debunk it?

You are obviously convinced that the government doesn't have anything to hide, so what do you care about the 911 truth movement?

What's the worst case scenario in your eyes? That the government will be forced to allow an unbaised official investigation of the events? In that case there would be nothing to fear, right? And all the conspirators would finally be silenced.

[BrianHamiltonTV]

They're desperately trying to hold on to the false concept that their government is truly benevolent.Cognitive dissonance in action..

[7Christian]

Your right many Americans are Mental Midgets but I for one know better. 911 being a controlled demolition it is apparent. Anyone with a brain that works should realize this. Many of us are too busy watching the Dumbass Cowboys are getting a cellphone upgrade to realize the truth. Some are waking up but the majority continue to wallow in their ignorance. Bush is a murderous SOB and who the hell knows what Obama has in store for us Americans. The puppets obey their masters " THE BANKERS".

[mnkyball]

I agree that some Americans aren't the smartest around, but everyone can see what happened IF they have knowledge about it. And the mainstream media does everything but spreading knowledge. It's not their fault :) Spread the truth around yourself!

[plasterdbastard]

Because you're wrong and you're galavanting.

Every argument in favour of CD is severely flawed. Even Jawenko's critique is flawed because you've shown him one perspective of the failure. Did you show him the gaping hole in the front of the building that the fire fighters reported as being almost 60% of the face? The diesel in the basement?

How about the failure of seismographs in the area to detect any explosions in the moments before 7 came down?

I can go on...

[JdoubleA2]

@foreverneil the people who held the highest stock and insurance that day were rewarded for their loss by the billions. for money it isnt worth killing innocent people.

[rawboyyyy]

Great comment buddy, let the gullible idiots blow smoke up the arse of the presidents and believe everything their told! Doing plenty of research on the 911 conspiracy, it was a set up, George bush's reaction is uncanny in that classroom, he knew what was going to happen. Little bastard, plus no buildings (twin towers) would free fall like that, there's thousands of tons of steel below the top of the buildings (part that was damaged) to get thruw, defies the laws of physics. wake up america!

[randomlaughingman]

The thing is, prior to all this (9-11) it was easy enough to try finding out about controlled demolitions - no-one had problems stating that it isn't easy to down a building without it falling over to one or more sides. That's why when a demolition takes place it takes a lot of planning and detailed placement of explosives to almost-guarantee that it will fall straight down. And that's for buildings of way less height.

[crinklewing]

Building 7 might have been wired for controlled demolition at the time of its construction, given the agencies that occupied it. If so, Silverstein would have known this. This might well be a standard feature of buildings that house classified materials. This way, in the event of a large-scale emergency requiring evacuation of the area in which the buildings are located, the materials they contain could be quickly destroyed and the risk of unauthorized access eliminated. This may be standard.

[NobodyBelievesYou]

Good points. Although even if this is the case and the explosives were justifiably there, it doesn't explain why the 9\11 Commission Report wouldn't just state that as the reason for its collapse. To have a legit reason to demolish a building then give a false, unsupported reason just seems too incriminating not to question.

[CTTBA]

What you say is irrelevant what Bertha knew. My how you twist things. Your 6 lines of separation makes no sense. Really low on the IQ aren't you? The Washington Post is a reliable source of information but you are full of lies, which I have debunked over and over. And no, Larry Silverstein talked about Building 7 being pulled, not the NYFD being pulled out. Anyone can watch the video. No matter how many twisted lies you try to cover it with shill, it was an inside job and you're a liar.

[pixman83]

If they were going to intentionally waste her, don't you think that there are less incriminating ways to do it? I'm commenting or your total lack of any evidence beyond where it happened, which you use as proof of some conspiracy.

You haven't debunked anything because you have yet to use these things called facts.

Do you even know what pulling a building even means? Did you miss that Larry said they, as in the NYFD?

If I'm a liar, why do I keep asking for proof, which YOU won't provide?

[davidmas0]

I agree it was an inside Job, I don't doubt it for a second

[CTTBA]

If you want to know the truth about 911, just search for Bertha Champagne on youtube or on Google. It is in the Washington Post archives. Murdered in Marvin Bush's front yard. You can look up his connections to Securacom and HCC Insurance both directly tied to the WTC. It's not that hard to figure out, these criminals left so many smoking guns. Larry Silverstein admitted it was an inside job and that they had pulled Building 7. If you want to hear it word for word:

/watch?v=7WYdAJQV100

[pixman83]

Have you, or anybody else, found any evidence that Bertha knew anything at all about 9/11? No. If she was murdered, have you considered why it took 2 years for it to happen? No. Have you considered that six lines of separation separate everyone on the planet? No.

Would you rely entirely on hearsay and rumor to plan you financial future? No, or at least I hope not. Then why do you so here?

An inside job where nobody has talked, wasn't planned, and couldn't have been carried out in time. Right.

[CTTBA]

Countless eyewitnesses on 911 reported hearing explosions. They are even heard in the 911 videos, and also seen. The financial system is under demolition now, as the NWO heightens its noose around America's throat for the final hanging. Read their agenda on the Georgia Guidestones. You can look it up in Wikipedia. But facts can't be argued with, murder in Marvin Bush's front yard isn't 'conspiracy theory' it's just plain fact. The facts of 911 are on video.

[pixman83]

Less than 7% of witnesses (according to the first responders interviews FOIA'd be the NYT) say they heard explosions relating to demolitions, and most of them make other statements that go against the idea that explosive were used.

How else would you explain such loud noises that occurred that day? For instance, NOBODY heard or recorded the sound of explosions that occurred in series similar to that which exists at an actual demo job.

[CTTBA]

Not sure where you got the '7%' from. There are plenty of eyewitnesses on site saying exactly that on youtube you can watch. Bertha Champagne was murdered in Marvin Bush's front yard. Molten metal was in the basements of the WTC. Marvin Bush worked on the Board of Directors of Securacom which provided security for the WTC and then for HCC which provided insurance on the WTC. Who said it was a normal demolition? The windows were air tight and weren't taken out as in a normal demolition.

[pixman83]

Ironically enough, from a 9/11 CT site. It mentioned ~35 people who claim hearing something related to explosives. The source for their count was from the 503 interviews FOIAed by the NYT, which I'll PM you.

Molten metal isn't molten steel, and should be an obvious find.

She was crushed by her car. Nobody has connected it to anything.

So now its an abnormal demolition? Get real. Airtight windows are the norm, and are not nearly strong enough to prevent an over pressure from blowing them out.

[CTTBA]

You just expose yourself as a little debunked shill. Silverstein never mentioned any firefighters being pulled from Building 7. He said they pulled IT and IT collapsed. The firefighters didn't collapse shill. Ever considered there's a target on the back of your arrogant little head shill? The speed of the aircraft isn't important shill. They hit 70+ stories up in the air. Molten steel was in the basement shill. Yes it was steel shill. Lol. Can you spell WTC BASEMENTS shill? Lol.

[pixman83]

Duh "it" collapsed. He said "THEY made the decision to pull" which means that the NYFD made the decision, not that they "pulled it."

Ever considered that relying on character attacks instead of using facts strengthens my argument?

If you think that damage caused by that much energy impacting the building is irrelevant, you are even dumber than you look.

Molten metal was found in the basements, NOT molten steel. Get your facts straight.

[davidmas0]

I am just curious, but where does it say that it was molton metal and not molton steel? steel is a form of metal isn't it?

[pixman83]

Where does it say that it was molten steel, and not some other metal?

Steel is a metal, but metal is not necessarily steel. There were dozens of other metals present in the towers (lead, aluminum, copper, tin, magnesium, zinc, etc) that ALL have melting points much, MUCH, lower than that of steel. In fact, it wouldn't be possible to see melted steel without seeing other molten metal first.

It couldn't have been molten steel because no fires were hot enough to melt steel OR keep it molten.

[IzNGra]

@pixman83 The satelite images show that the thermite used was burning a whole week after the collapse. This means that the temperatures were skyrocketing the moment the support pillars were cut.

[CTTBA]

Larry Silverstein, the lease-holder of the WTC complex admitted on camera (you can also watch that on youtube) that it was an inside job. He said they 'pulled Building 7'. Which the NWO shills like to try to twist into his saying they pulled the firefighters out, but that is not true. It is not what he said. Jet fuel is kerosene. It won't do jack squat to steel. Sorry. Jets don't turn 110 story buildings to powder that chases people down the street. Time to wake up and watch the $ crash.

[CTTBA]

So many other things stink about 911, like the molten metal under the buildings including building 7, and no plane hit the basements! Or if you prefer, Google Bertha Champagne, murdered in Marvin Bush's front yard. You can also look up his connections to 911 through Securacom and HCC Insurance. Larry Silverstein admitted it was an inside job. He said on camera that they had 'pulled building 7'. When will Americans wake up? When they're dead or taken over by fascist/communism?

[pixman83]

Molten metal doesn't equal molten steel, which is something they DIDN't find. However, red hot steel was quite commonly found, and has been fairly well explained. The people examining the steel certainly weren't surprised, based on the conditions after the collapse.

Obviously no planes hit the basement, but that doesn't mean the impact didn't influence conditions there.

Silverstein said that they (the NYFD( made the decision to pull (rescue efforts) from the scene hours before the collapse.

[CTTBA]

The molten steel in the Basements was not explained. There is no explanation of any molten metal in the basements. No real investigation was carried out. And no, Larry Silverstein was not talking about the NYFD and made no mention of them. You can watch him on youtube. What you say is simply not correct. You can believe what you want. But Bertha Champagne and Marvin Bush blow the lid off of 911. It was an inside job whether shills can ever admit it or not. The evidence is overwhelming.

[pixman83]

Ever heard of the NIST investigation?

I did watch Silverstein, and came up with the correct conclusion, you didn't.

Is there ANY evidence that Bertha knew anything? No, there isn't. If she had died of a heart attack you wouldn't even know about her.

If you think it was an inside job provide some actual evidence for once. Not claims, not mysterious circumstances, not things you don't understand, not what other random people have said. Actual acceptable to the court of law evidence.

[CTTBA]

She didn't die of a heart attack shill, why do you twist things so? She was Marvin Bush's housekeeper/Nanny and she was mashed to death by her car which mysteriously followed her across his yard shill. Why do you insist on being a fascist shill? What do you get out of it shill? Illuminati clearance? Lol. That target on the back of your head is getting bigger and bigger. Is Bushy shit your older brother who's managed to keep you alive?

[pixman83]

Do you have that much trouble reading? I said IF.

You ever notice that calling somebody a shill (16 times in your last posts) is the most potent thing you've done? Thats the behavior of immature children, not reasoned adults. For all of your belief on the topic, you haven't managed to support anything with a single bit of factual data. The fact that you'd rather attack me, as opposed to my argument, just proves that you lack the ability to do more than scream insults and deprecations.

[JSSTyger]

Its an interview. They don't have time to go over every paragraph of NIST and FEMA.

They showed photos of the wreckage. Is this not enough? Maybe they shoulda showed some of that steel taht looked like swiss cheese.

[pixman83]

The NIST report wasn't out yet, and he didn't even address the main points of the FEMA report.

If you think that seeing a few pictures, one video, and part of a building plan is enough for anybody to provide a valid theory, I'd hate to see what a used car salesmen can sell you.

Given that the metal you are talking about has proven to be eroded after the collapse, I don't see how it would be very useful to him. Except as a further indicator that there was no evidence of explosives.

[CTTBA]

Let's go through some more eyewitness accounts of 'EXPLOSIONS' shill, on taped tv. Of course you would say these are all actors, but you are the shill. This is just for the record of people who are uninformed about what happened. I am trying to tell them so there is no mistake who is running their country. Here are eyewitness accounts of EXPLOSIONS at the WTC on 911, shill. It's public record shill. That's all, no matter who protects you, a target is on your head. /watch?v=n593Hth8h9M

[pixman83]

I'll see your eyewitness accounts, and raise you to 503 eyewitness accounts from first responders.

graphics8. nytimes. com/packages/html/nyregion /20050812_WTC_GRAPHIC/met_WTC_­histories_full_01 .html

I'll additionally raise you videos a block away from the collapse, which records the sound of no explosions:

watch?v=4NzSxSUb0Kk

watch?v=3OWeGGJxnLY

watch?v=9AJbMOUp1DE

watch?v=99Z6qoP-elw

Add onto that the lack of a recorded explosion from every radio, cell, and TV broadcast in the area.

[kaiser0soze]

Watch Barry Jennings' interview (WTC7 survivor) and research WTC6. More importantly, watch Aaron Russo's interview to find out the hidden agenda behind these "wars" and why the collapse of our economy was planned, and why 9/11 was planned as the ripple effect event to kick things off.

At this point whoever thinks 9/11 and these "wars" aren't planned events involving American traitors within the U.S. government is a naive moron.

R.I.P Barry Jennings & Aaron Russo.

[pixman83]

An expert that makes his answer dependent on seeing only on perspective doesn't seem like much of an expert to me. Especially when he pointedly doesn't talk about how long it would take his demo crew to set it up. Not to mention that clearing columns for demo is more than a little bit obvious.

[JSSTyger]

I take it you didn't watch the full uncut interview pixman. All of that is discussed.

[pixman83]

Actually I did watch that interview and it wasn't discussed at all. NOBODY discussed the minor issue that no explosives were heard or seen by anybody.

Jawenko mentions the possibility of hasty work, but never says how long he thinks it would take. He also never considers the evidence left behind. He created a theoretical possibility built around a single perspective that was absent of any other evidence.

[JSSTyger]

Oh please spare me the whining.They told Jowenko the whole story.They went over the fire scenario and he still says nope...its demo.I have no idea why the audio is so important when you have every other characteristic of a standard CD. And besides.What do we hear in the videos when WTC 1 and 2 fall? NOTHING. What do people on the streets hear?

"Then it started poppin out...floor by floor...like boom boom boom...like one of them implosion jobs"

And...Jowenko didn't need further evidence

[pixman83]

They didn't tell Jawenko half the story. They only even showed him a single perspective of the collapse for crying out loud.

The audio is critically important because there can be no explosive blast without an explosive sound. In the complete absence of such a sound, there must be an absence of any explosives.

<8% of people, and no recordings, heard anything explosive for WTC 1&2. The absence of anything unusual is why most CTers have largely dropped the use of explosives on those buildings.

[wreckerhead]

This guy is a moron. in order to implode you must attach the shape charges to the columns which would have been impossible because the building was burning. I did implosion work for about 6 years and know the prep work alone would have taken months . I think someone would have noticed people cuting into the columns on multiple floors fo week.I wrked the WTC doing clean upadno traces of implosion work was ever found there

[Reactordrone]

People who think WTC 7 collapsed from the bottom aren't looking closely enough.The collapse of the penthouse is evidence of internal collapse and the buildings collapse pattern shows the side that was on fire most fiercely fell first pulling the back of the building down over it.

Seeing it from only one angle gives a very distorted impression of what actually happened.

[TonyMontanasc]

Isn't this more evidence that the twin towers were not cont. demolition? He implies that wtc7 was a controlled demolition and that in his opinion the twin towers were not. He states that it starts from the bottom and not the top. The twin towers clearly started collapsing from the tops of the building and lack that signature "sway" that you always see from controlled demolition building right before they go.

[jeffsst]

thats a false conclusion. if you can implode a building you can just as easily explode one for shock effect!

watch 911 mysteries and you will be convinced, not a doubt in my mind... cheers

[OldSmellyCrotch]

I see the debunkers are staying clear of this video!

[ahamatmabrahman]

On 9/11 my freinds came to visit. The tv volume was off as we were talking. The images of the WTC showed maybe 5 times before we turned on the volume, this was because each of us assumed that this was just an advert for a new Hollywood movie.

[vegeta04]

i am dutch and untill this day he still believes it's blown up byexplosives

it doesn'ttake a professor to know that 911 was an inside job

[gabriellus021]

He is a demolition expert, but you don't need to be one to figure out it was controlled demolition. You have to be really stupid to believe "big chunks" caused the building to collapse lol :D

[iWhacko]

I'm surprised this video hasn't been viewed very often :P

[reespeer]

im not surprised, the title should be 9/11 or should at least have 'america' in it.. this would video would reach millions more..