Return To Oz is a good, if not a bit creepy movie but it differs from the original because the character designs are off-the-wall and totally different, Tin man looks like (and probably is) a puppet, lion is more lion-like and Scarecrow is more creepy.
That wasn't my point, I meant that when dorothy meets them again they look nothing like they did before, which I think is an odd move considering Return to Oz was a sequwel to the first movie.
I wasn't responding to anyone's comment here really - just observing that this movie is truer to the books - I have several of them and grew up reading them. Both films are great in their own ways, but The Wizard Of Oz stunned me as a child bc it is so different from the book.
actually, when she meets them here, they look exactly the way they were intended to look in the first movie, thing is that the original was given a bit a colorful make up and stuff, but if you read the books, the lion tinman and scare crow in this movie look exactly how the books depict them.
Yes, that's Judy Garland singing, but no, it's not the recording she did for the original movie. I don't think the song really fits Return to Oz (they were very different films), but this is a great video nevertheless.
Return To Oz is a good, if not a bit creepy movie but it differs from the original because the character designs are off-the-wall and totally different, Tin man looks like (and probably is) a puppet, lion is more lion-like and Scarecrow is more creepy.
doctorwhoobawooba 2 years ago
It is much, much truer to the Oz books than the 1939 film is.
mothgirlwings 2 years ago
That wasn't my point, I meant that when dorothy meets them again they look nothing like they did before, which I think is an odd move considering Return to Oz was a sequwel to the first movie.
doctorwhoobawooba 2 years ago
I wasn't responding to anyone's comment here really - just observing that this movie is truer to the books - I have several of them and grew up reading them. Both films are great in their own ways, but The Wizard Of Oz stunned me as a child bc it is so different from the book.
mothgirlwings 2 years ago
They look much more like the Jon R Neill illustrations in the original books than the 1939 film - I think that is why.
mothgirlwings 2 years ago
actually, when she meets them here, they look exactly the way they were intended to look in the first movie, thing is that the original was given a bit a colorful make up and stuff, but if you read the books, the lion tinman and scare crow in this movie look exactly how the books depict them.
sidney765 2 years ago
Hmm, intriguing.
doctorwhoobawooba 2 years ago
do u use windows movie maker?.
Tiffmidon 3 years ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
Nice Video lolz, my names Anna, im feelin n0rty and h0rn3y if any guyz wana chat im usually on
___ FriendlyFlirts..dot..COM ___ my username there is Anna-wjsmpryai chat soon ;)
djsanti 3 years ago
she's the best,luckily dear connie learnt to sing this song,its lovely
lynbabysusu 4 years ago
she's the best,luckily dear connie learnt to sing this song,its lovely
lynbabysusu 4 years ago
she's the best,luckily dear connie learnt to sing this song,its lovely
lynbabysusu 4 years ago
lmao she looks funnt at the end lol
Kaitybubbles 4 years ago
Love it
FrodrickVFS 4 years ago
Yes, that's Judy Garland singing, but no, it's not the recording she did for the original movie. I don't think the song really fits Return to Oz (they were very different films), but this is a great video nevertheless.
lastsafeplace 4 years ago
lovely
peibolchan 4 years ago
Not too bad! A rather unexpected combination. What recording did you use?
RoyalKidofOz 4 years ago
thanks for commenting! I don't really know. Isn't it the original version from the movie The Wizard of Oz with Judy Garland?
georgiemaryk 4 years ago
Nope. The original soundtrack version has a different tone and Judy sounds younger. But you DO have a Judy Garland recording.
RoyalKidofOz 4 years ago
lol I downloaded the one I have from the Internet, that's why I didn't know!
georgiemaryk 4 years ago