A space ship or some sort of particle accelerator that could create a wave that is bended downwards in front of the ship and a wave that is bended upwards behind the ship, this would create two waves one in front and one in the back.
So this ship would be riding in between two gravity waves which travel at the speed of light, its not the ship that would be moving but merely space.
There is no need for a wormhole or the ability to reach the speed of light.
For example, you can easily see that, by that definition, the length of any segment on the line y = ix is zero .If y is a complex function of a real variable x, it would make more sense to define the element of length by: ds^2 = dx^2 + |dy|^2 where |dy| is the complex absolute value.
It is not possible to make the field of complex numbers into an ordered field, i.e., to define an ordering relation compatible with the operations of addition and multiplication (for example, should i be positive or negative ?). This means that, in such a case, the concept of "shorter distance" becomes meaningless.
and this implies that ds^2 is always a positive real number, and the same applies to ds.If x and y are complex, this is no longer true: ds may be complex. You can see this in the example, where the approximation for small x is given by: c = x^(3/2) * sqrt(2*i)
One of my family told me that the chinese "will" rule the world. They went major with making toys, tech, cars, cell phones, etc. Now I'm pretty sure that they will discover from the way the galactic wormhole appears, to travelling at the speed of light. Any1 agree?
Very nice video donylee. I must say that I don't understand from where exactly you pull the function:
y = x^2 + ix
Is that just an arbitrary complex function you chose? Is it actually the modern physics representation of a worm hole? It seems like the rest of the presentation depends on that function and I'd like to understand just slightly more about how you chose it.
No, it hasn't been proven, but mathematically it should not work. See, the domains of the numbers are different, the imaginary domain would never go into a real number. So, for example:
the Pythagorean Theorem is a^2+b^2=c^2 or a=sqrt b^2+c^2
if b=an imaginary number, b^2=-1(x[a number]). Remember your basic imaginary identities...i^2=-1, and i=sqrt -1
They would never have the same domain. Say the real numbers are in one set and the imaginaries are in another, and the complex are in another...
sorry i ran put of room. and there a typo in my first comment....the two different sets should be real numbers and complex numbers. in this case a complex number is defined as a real number and an imaginary number. now continuing on my first comment...
...no combination of those numbers would allow intersection of those two sets.
so to answer your question....it has not been proved but it wouldn't work. =]
hmm so it ends up if we measure the length of a plain ol complex function on an interval it turns out shorter then a straight line? niffty , Though I still didn't study complex analysis
Absolutely brilliant. I was able to comprehend your entire lecture, i just wish that the camera was directed toward the top of the board so I could view the rest of your calculations.
I could definately see the passion you have for it as well. Keep up the amazing work.
As a fellow intellectual (and by that I only mean another individual who finds pleasure in the pursuit of knowledge and understanding of our universe), I must commend you on a very fascinating presentation.
I only wish I understood it more, my math is terrible! I'm studying philosophy, but I do find this subject very cool!
Thanks for the comment. May I humbly say that my knowledge comes from reading all the marvelous books written by the great professors who have endlessly contributed to the subject of mathematics.
ok do exactly what you just did exept dumb it down a little.
pokemonkiller20 1 year ago
sweet! This is interesting!
deadcartmen 1 year ago
It doesn't matter how smart you are. If you do a whole lecture with the top of the board cut off by the camera...
... how smart are you?
AromaticBovine 2 years ago
Ur such a wormhole.
DiscoverPlatinum 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
DoubleDutchBust 2 years ago
wats all of this ?
hectorandrespv 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
DoubleDutchBust 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Mathematical Wormholeonaeskg
RecoletaCemeteryseangdonylee
Mathematical Wormholeonaeskg
EverythingrayLees t r a n g e j e g
BasicMathematics e yLagranged
DoubleDutchBust 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Combat choppersBlackhawk & 3:23Chinook/Chinhook Helicopterseanworms
MathematicalWormHole pt1 5:45donylees
Chinook/Chinhook Helicopterseanworms
Combat choppersBlackhawk & 3:23 cbc
Basic Mathopepers
DoubleDutchBust 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
MoleFace
OldNews
Johnson
OldNews
MoleFace
Get and cause trouble for sure though.
Ask Bennie j. (hands) ok thanks_
DoubleDutchBust 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
MoleFace I know all about
LimaStret factoids pertaining
To the beat street crew.
Detailseankalielgraycdonylee
Mathematical Wormholeilakey
Detailseankalielgraycdonylee
Basic Math
DoubleDutchBust 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
numbers to not lie
unless u are one
k r i s
f r i e d
c h i c ken
s.e .c my secretaryum
Mathematical Wormhole
She got legs? Secretary
DoubleDutchBust 2 years ago
k r i s i s k g
n e r d u s m
e a t p i
t
DoubleDutchBust 2 years ago
Mathematical Wormhole
ZedikermikeredNorthrop
Mathematical Wormhole
As long as we got class
Paul "Bear" Bryant kris
donylee u s m Ok back to class.
DoubleDutchBust 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
A space ship or some sort of particle accelerator that could create a wave that is bended downwards in front of the ship and a wave that is bended upwards behind the ship, this would create two waves one in front and one in the back.
So this ship would be riding in between two gravity waves which travel at the speed of light, its not the ship that would be moving but merely space.
There is no need for a wormhole or the ability to reach the speed of light.
Emamnuelguzman86 2 years ago
This guy is too smart for my liking
searchquerymatthius 2 years ago
He may have been talking in Japanese, i would of understood it just the same lol
Clever guy though and fun to watch him assume everyone knows wtf he is talking about xD
dsswoosh 3 years ago
I didn't understand this - got an 'E' at A level maths, I just like looking at him : )
welovejim 3 years ago
Am I Not Wrong?
mekvek 3 years ago
Well that does mean 'Am I right?', which is the same as asking 'right?', which is common.
Am I not wrong?
Anon1696 3 years ago
you are nut;)
zernestro 2 years ago
a nut is you too
Anon1696 2 years ago
For example, you can easily see that, by that definition, the length of any segment on the line y = ix is zero .If y is a complex function of a real variable x, it would make more sense to define the element of length by: ds^2 = dx^2 + |dy|^2 where |dy| is the complex absolute value.
Dr. Miguel , Ph.D.
lotr422 3 years ago
It is not possible to make the field of complex numbers into an ordered field, i.e., to define an ordering relation compatible with the operations of addition and multiplication (for example, should i be positive or negative ?). This means that, in such a case, the concept of "shorter distance" becomes meaningless.
lotr422 3 years ago
The proof is wrong, here's why:
In the real plane, we define the length by:
ds^2 = dx^2 + dy^2
and this implies that ds^2 is always a positive real number, and the same applies to ds.If x and y are complex, this is no longer true: ds may be complex. You can see this in the example, where the approximation for small x is given by: c = x^(3/2) * sqrt(2*i)
which is hardly a real number.
lotr422 3 years ago
rotinimod is right it does seem like an arbitrary selection.. no explaination given
TestaBottleZ 3 years ago
One of my family told me that the chinese "will" rule the world. They went major with making toys, tech, cars, cell phones, etc. Now I'm pretty sure that they will discover from the way the galactic wormhole appears, to travelling at the speed of light. Any1 agree?
shadeblade109 3 years ago
He is from Singapore, you dude
jockie0706 2 years ago
The Chinese and the Japanese are going to rule the world one day just like England did.
NinjaKid3000 3 years ago 5
Just as an addendum, what I mean primarily is why you chose
y = x^2 + ix
as opposed to
y = ix^2 + ix, or y = ix, or y = 2x^5 - 3ix
rotanimod 3 years ago
Very nice video donylee. I must say that I don't understand from where exactly you pull the function:
y = x^2 + ix
Is that just an arbitrary complex function you chose? Is it actually the modern physics representation of a worm hole? It seems like the rest of the presentation depends on that function and I'd like to understand just slightly more about how you chose it.
Again, very nice.
rotanimod 3 years ago
camera too low. cant see the diagram.
but thats ok. Dont really get it anyway.
DavidRoyinTokyo 3 years ago 3
Respect!! Many interesting videos... ThankS.
gatoazul4321 3 years ago
woops, sorry, i posted on the wrong account...anyways,
donylee,
could you possibly do a video on chaos theory???
thanks
trinitypaintballa 3 years ago
hey donylee,
could you possibly do a video on chaos theory??
thanks
banjoman05494 3 years ago
Lol Im A Not Wrong... Uh I mean
NigelAndres 3 years ago
Just wondering, has it been proven that pytagores theorem works for complex numbers?
illusion422 3 years ago
No, it hasn't been proven, but mathematically it should not work. See, the domains of the numbers are different, the imaginary domain would never go into a real number. So, for example:
the Pythagorean Theorem is a^2+b^2=c^2 or a=sqrt b^2+c^2
if b=an imaginary number, b^2=-1(x[a number]). Remember your basic imaginary identities...i^2=-1, and i=sqrt -1
They would never have the same domain. Say the real numbers are in one set and the imaginaries are in another, and the complex are in another...
trinitypaintballa 3 years ago
sorry i ran put of room. and there a typo in my first comment....the two different sets should be real numbers and complex numbers. in this case a complex number is defined as a real number and an imaginary number. now continuing on my first comment...
...no combination of those numbers would allow intersection of those two sets.
so to answer your question....it has not been proved but it wouldn't work. =]
trinitypaintballa 3 years ago
Nice presentation, very clear. Btw,I have a request. Could you make videos on Topology? I am kinda stuck on that. Thx
dragonlorder 3 years ago
Woah, Topology! I look at that subject with fear. Nope, have not touched a bit on topology.
No videos will be coming anytime soon. Sorry.
donylee 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Im 12 years old and i still understand this wow
bdoughty814 3 years ago
hmm so it ends up if we measure the length of a plain ol complex function on an interval it turns out shorter then a straight line? niffty , Though I still didn't study complex analysis
LongShlong125 3 years ago
wtf is everybody being sarcastic about understanding him or what?
mrkrazie89 4 years ago
im 13 years old and i still understood this! you do a good job of explaining stuff.
qqqCYBERLEADERppp 4 years ago
nice i understand perfectally you speak like rodney macay
leeadamaa 4 years ago
Absolutely brilliant. I was able to comprehend your entire lecture, i just wish that the camera was directed toward the top of the board so I could view the rest of your calculations.
I could definately see the passion you have for it as well. Keep up the amazing work.
tiredoftypical 4 years ago
Donylee,
As a fellow intellectual (and by that I only mean another individual who finds pleasure in the pursuit of knowledge and understanding of our universe), I must commend you on a very fascinating presentation.
I only wish I understood it more, my math is terrible! I'm studying philosophy, but I do find this subject very cool!
Well done!
Sparkp1ug 4 years ago
This guy sounds smart
MO800 4 years ago
Hello MO800,
Thanks for the comment. May I humbly say that my knowledge comes from reading all the marvelous books written by the great professors who have endlessly contributed to the subject of mathematics.
donylee 4 years ago