I'm contacting my Federal Rep to try and get any and all time, money and expenses to this hoax 'global warming' scam ended. No Kyotos or anymore of this nonsense. So far so good as people do seem to be leaving this. Of course, just like the 'hole in the ozone' there will be another one of these 'chicken little' scams dreamed up by the Marxists for the next decade. but maybe 'Cry Wolf' is the better fable analogy here.
@bigolol Don't play dumb. Unless you are fantastically ignorant or naive you would be well aware how socialists, lefties and even 'admitted' self-described Marxists in the West absolutely love and support, dedicate and almost 'live for' Co2-Global warming hoaxes. Obviously this is because their 'solution' is for government to take more control over big business. I'm not asking you. I'm teaching you. Don't reply. Just sit there knowing full well I'm bang-on the money and you know it.
@ElProximo It's nice of you to teach me however this condescending tone seems kinda out of place. I am in fact not fully aware of it, so I'd really like you to open my eyes and present me some evidence for it- links to sites etc. To me it seems as if some americans just can't get over the fact that the cold war is over and now have nothing left to fear, so you think that somehow the marxists won after all and are now in your government. But please, feel free to convince me otherwise
@bigolol Uh no, I won't be trying to convince you of anything or doing your homework (which amounts to opening your fucking eyes) but I won't be doing your simple 1st grader homework for you. BTW, have you ever noticed how many people in Climate Change Activist groups are those kind of Right-wing Capitalist Free Market 'Conservative' types? NO YOU DIDNT YOU ABSOLUTE POOP-FLINGING FUCKTARD. Wow. Don't be stupid and ask me to play along. Honestly, get real you phony
@bigolol Real science, real investigation, rational thinking, investigating the hoax, definition games, propaganda and then smashing it with common sense is what makes me (and everyone else) the 'winner' of this debate. Enjoy warming - it produces life. It is not going to start or stop by controlling corporations. Go find your next 'chicken little' scam, join the junior marxists disguised as environmenalists. Will expose that one too.
does not mean man made climate change. Warming has occurred in the past and we are coming out of a cool phase, so naturally we have a warming trend. Also the other planets in the solar system are warming so its the sun that's doing the warming a slight rise in co2 which is still a trace element let alone the even smaller amount humans contribute doesn't mean a thing
@greenman3610 So your saying that big burning ball in the sky,has nothing to do with warming on earth. So you don't agree the sun has been getting stronger as time goes by. You really are a one way thinking nazi alarmist and that reference turnout to be bogus so you just make up shit
see my two most recent videos, discussion the sun and the general cluelessness of deniers on this point. The sun would have a lot to do with warming if it was putting out more heat - but its not. We can measure this quite well with modern satellite technology. Why is that hard to understand?
@greenman3610 I have seen recently that the sun output has risen that explains why the solar system has shown signs of temperature rises. You greenman (more like bullshitman) were looking at the data the wrong way round. I suggest turning the data the right way and then look again and you will find that the suns output has risen. Regards from nonbelieverman
@greenman3610 All your facts are propaganda, independent research has shown a rise in the suns output. Please people don't believe a word of what this fraud (greenman) is saying he is quoting corrupt data its all smoke and mirrors
@Aanthanur Dr Sami Solanki of Max Plank Institute for Solar System Research in Germany. Google it and check for yourself. The sun has been getting brighter and producing more heat and that concurries with my observations, have a good day. regards from nonbelieverman.
@vmgqie in witch year was his study published? in google shoolar i can find some of his papers, but those i started to read dont confirm what you say. so i would like to know wich aper exactly, you got the tile and year?
@vmgqie also interesting is to note that he himself thinks Humans are the main reason, but he does indeed belief the sun might also have more influence than generally beliefed.
@Aanthanur HE is probably scared of the whole global warming nazi machine.He throw humans main reason just so his career is not destroyed by you lot hateful nazi bastards
Studies at the Max Planck Institute for Solar System Research reveal: solar activity affects the climate but plays only a minor role in the current global warming
@vmgqie However, researchers at the MPS have shown that the Sun can be responsible for, at most, only a small part of the warming over the last 20-30 years.
@Aanthanur They took the measured and calculated variations in the solar brightness over the last 150 years and compared them to the temperature of the Earth. Although the changes in the two values tend to follow each other for roughly the first 120 years, the Earth’s temperature has risen dramatically in the last 30 years while the solar brightness has not appreciably increased in this time.
@Aanthanur greenman was saying in his bullshit video's it can't be the sun, sun output had been falling these scientists are saying sun has been increasing output which concurs with observation so what you got to say now
@Aanthanur The sun has increased its brightness and output, that's not misunderstanding that's catching greenman being an alarmist nazi bullshit artist. your in a cult like Scientology do yourself a favour get out while you can
@vmgqie Just how large this role is, must still be investigated, since, according to our latest knowledge on the variations of the solar magnetic field, the significant increase in the Earth’s temperature since 1980 is indeed to be ascribed to the greenhouse effect caused by carbon dioxide," says Prof. Sami K. Solanki, solar physicist and director at the Max Planck Institute for Solar System Research.
@Aanthanur the sun has increased its output and brightness chew on that. Your religion its easy to destroy because it's made of lies and when you lie you are found out
@vmgqie found another quote, but only in German: “Ein wichtiger Faktor ist mittlerweile die globale Erwärmung, die wir für die Studie herausgenommen haben. Da diese in den vergangenen 30 Jahren 0,4 Grad betrug, während die Sonne jedoch schwächer geworden ist, ist diese sicher zum Großteil nicht auf die Sonne zurückzuführen”, so Solanki.
@Aanthanur Is that all you have to say, poor guy I feel sorry for you.What sort of bullshit is that. If I can FIND ARGUMENTS AGAINST GLOBAL WARMING IN 5 MINUTES ON GOOGLE WHAT DOES SAY ABOUT YOUR THEORY. I'll tell you for free its bullshit from top to bottom. In fact I feel sorry for you dickhead
@Aanthanur Could it be your piss off because I found a argument against man made global warming and these stupid crock of the week video's from bullshitman oh I mean greenman. That's why you don't wont to continue, no worries, I have won another debate thanks for proving global warming is a crock of shit
@vmgqie i highly doubt you ever won a debate or even had a real debate.
you have not provided an argmuent against AGW, your source you cited does actually say the opposite of you. His reasearch shows that you are wrong. extremely wrong.wh
ats next? you will claim he faked his data and evidence just to conform with those "warming nazis" ?and will you do that again without a shred of evidence?
@Aanthanur Well isn't that typical of your breed of alarmist. Dr Sami Solaki research said the sun had become brighter and the output increased, you even said that a few statements back and now your saying the opposite.So that's what happen's to any proof against man made global warming you turn it around and try make it say something else just like these stupid crock of the week video's, that's not science. Did not learn a thing from climategate also I won you just deny it, now your the denier
@vmgqie you are a blatant liar. I debunkd your Solaki claim, he did not say that at all, and his research does not support your claims in the slightest. you'r trolling is just laughable.
@Aanthanur Are you calling me a liar, are calling me a liar. I Leave lying to you alarmist nazi and not to mention greenman who should change his name to bullshitman I debunk your claims of debunking my claims. Dr Sami Solaki did say the sun's output and brightness has increased and you said ( at the MPS have shown that the sun can be responsible for, at most only a small part of the warming over the last 20-30 year's.)YOUR WORD'S are you denying this, your the denier and a sore loser PRICK
@greenman3610 hay bullshitman ho I mean greenman you make a very poor scientist. That what happens when your trying to back a false theory, that's based on one small truth and the rest is made of lies and distortions.But good luck with that you alarmist nazi
@greenman3610 Dr Sami Solnki said the sun is responsible for some of the warming and I also that is debatable more like all the warming because co2 does not drive climate but you don't listen or you ignore my comments.See that's what alarmist nazi do, they ignore evidence wont debate scientist, who are deniers and there are plenty. Your just caught up in this false religion, invest your time and money in something worth while. Man made global warming is a con and we know it, give it up
@greenman3610Solar variability is unlikely to have caused strong warming.Your words, so its caused some warming how much is debatable. In your video's you say the sun has caused no warming and now you say its caused some warming your words.Your contradicting yourself not very scientific but you alarmist dismiss any evidence that doesn't suit you and the global warming bullshit theory you wonder why no one believes your propaganda.Your video's should be called climate change is a load of crock
@greenman3610 the sun's output has increased, but that doesn't fit the propaganda does it , because there's nothing we can do about it, and you said on your video the sun output was low, wrong wrong and wrong again just like all your bullshit
Climatology is not even a legitimate science like Meteorology is. Some Meteorologists may study climate but they are not Climatologists. Capitalism creates a lot of new science fields that are beneficial to powerful profitable class interests. Financial interest behind science is not an irrelevant issue and needs to be discusssed along with scientific debate. Look at Al Gore and Bill Clinton. They wery quite cozy with Nuclear in their home state. Nuclear and oil are behind AGW
And what the fuck does this "crock of the week" nonsense seen in Atheist videos have to do with having a real debate about Climate variation? I'm so sick of hearing the term from these "positivists' "$cience for the win " types who are effectively idealist.
Climate creates the weather!! No scientists in the world will be able explain why is it carbon dioxide is changing the weather like that. Before they were claiming carbon dioxide heat trapping gas what about the cold what they can say about that? If truly they want to know how carbon dioxide effects our weather I do have an answer for them & very accurate to.
Outbound IR does not melt Arctic ice, or cause glaciers to break off. It cools. It's thermal energy leaving point A for B. That's the opposite of B inputting energy into A.
Because of entropy, whatever outgoing IR is absorbed by a CO2 molecule at 3km up won't boomerang back to the emitter. Some will convert to kinetic, the rest will flow to systems of lower energy state.
The enhanced greenhouse effect is based on an old defunct hypothesis how greenhouses work. In the IPCC’s world sunlight hits the earth; IR emits from the surface; trace gases in the cooler troposphere absorb certain spectra and some emits back to the warmer surface. A total reversal of the laws of thermodynamics.
Temperature, unless mechanically influenced, naturally and irreversibly flows hot to cold - ice cubes don’t warm the coffee. It’s impossible for lower energy systems to heat systems of higher energy and HES to cool LES, unless externally influenced. If did, after boiling a pot of water and turning off the element the water would never cool to room temperature.
Anybody notice that this video maker, in place of explaining how human activity warms the Earth's surface, attacks people who oppose his purported views?
Real scientists, who know their subject matter, never partake in that fallacy.
It ought to go without saying that ever since the Earth has had an atmosphere that the climate has undergone continuous change since then. Making the term "Climate Change" about 5 billion years old.
The habitable surface of Earth is about 15 Celsius yearly average. How and why is this?
One of the originating energy inputs is solar radiation. There's a second, and it isn't surface re-emitted infrared. Does solar radiation require gas molecules to manifest as 'heat'? No. The thermosphere temperature peaks at about 1500C and there are very few molecules of any sort up there, what few there is are kilometers apart.
Leave your car out in the summer sun for an hour or so and then touch the hood , it's warm. Sometimes ouch warm. That's infrared energy. Now touch the ground, even if asphalt. It's nowhere near the hood's warmth. Did the ground temperature make the car hood hot to the touch? No. If you raise your hand off the car hood does it get hotter the higher you raise? No. None of the hood's infrared makes a u-turn and comes back down to warm the top of your hand. It goes up while EM comes down.
@RenoDoctor greenman3610 isn't a scientist but he does his research very well. But there's no need for you to argue with an amateur like him.
Head on over to RealClimateDOTorg and show THOSE know-nothings just how much you know. Do come back to let us know how you showed them how little they understand - we'll be waiting.
@bannor99 Well that's just it. Nearly all of these people are freelance writers, PR hacks or lobbyists funded by the market earnings of hugely wealthy charitable foundations to spread the global warming dogma, which has no supporting scientific evidence. Many of these foundations have substantial shares in 'green' retail merchandise and services.
@RenoDoctor If you think there's no scientific support, you haven't been reading the actual science. "Hugely wealthy", "green shares"?? The REAL BIG money is in the hands of the business-as-usual crowd.
Roll the clock back 40-50 years and you'll find that cigarettes don't do bad things and "most doctors" agree they might even be good for you.
@bannor99 'Scientific' regards ultra cynical attitude and methodologies employed to distinguish truth from fiction. 50 years ago predecessor charitable foundations were alarming about an imminent ice age. Tobacco PR, exactly the same PR propaganda employed by AGW, dates back to Edward Bernays, just post-WWI.
@greenman3610 Avg. temp began an annual downward trend starting around 1940, all blamed on human CO2, rebounding by the ‘80s, the increase also blamed on human CO2. The first AG-cooling academic paper appeared about '63. The '80s was the nuclear winter sham, and AGW officially replaced both by the '95 Al Gore, Jr show.
Climate scientists have no connection to tobacco co.s or corrupt US doctors.
@RenoDoctor Wrong. A PROPER "skeptical" attitude is required of a scientist; what is exhibited by the premier DENIALists is distortion and contrarian cherrypicking. I have yet to hear an explanation from Pat Michaels as to why he chose the LEAST likely scenario from Hansen's '88 projections
Wrong. A good scientist will always try to prove a theory wrong. This is what AGW scientists have failed to do. You "peer review" people always accuse real science of "cherrypicking" when that is exactly what is being done in "official" commoditized science.for profit. Climate variation is caused by the Milankovitch cycles. To reduce this amazing and varied climaate of earth to one parameter, co2, is unreasonable
@dialectical44 Aren't you then reducing it to a single parameter yourself? You're essentially saying it's the sun and nothing else. But without any GHGs, we would be living in a frozen spaceball, Milankovitch cycles or not.
Also, a lot of work has gone into finding other explanations - no other even mildly plausible explanation has been found, although a lot of wild conjectures have been made, which is the whole point of greenman's debunking
The sun has a much bigger influence on the Earth than the C02. I woud Malenkovitch cycles are more than plausable. Most high caliber scientists agree that it is not Co2. We must look at the interests behind the proponents of this C02 theory. I have a couple videos of MIT's Richard Lindzen tha tmight help.
What I mean to say is that outside of the Milenkovitch Theory we can't reducee it to this or that factor. Many other factors have local influences on termpreature including Co2. Even wheat fields effect local temperatures by reflecting the sun. I find it puzzling that people don't want to see the financial incentives behind C02. Many people don't realize that c02 is NOT pollution.
Good point!! Don't forget the Nuclear Industry and Oil companies. They were behind it from the beginning. Gore and Clinton were friends of the Nuclear industry in their home state before they got into the white house. The US has the licenses to build Nuclear Plants worldwide. Multi trillion dollar The Carbon trading deriative scheme will create haardship on all via taxes for a long time to come. I am one of the few Sociaist/Communists speaking up. Check out my playlist
That's my point. Our science institutions are run by weatlhy classes. Science, especiall after the Bayh-Dole act(1980) is in the hands of very powerful interests that gain great advantage from it's development. Marx and Engels spelled this out over a centruy ago (not about science in particular, as Marx was a lover of science) in his base/superstructure argument. Science has been hijacked by Capitalism. Science needs to be free of Capitalist interests.
That's my point. Our science institutions are run by weatlhy classes. Science, especiall after the Bayh-Dole act(1980) is in the hands of very powerful interests that gain great advantage from it's development. Marx and Engels spelled this out over a centruy ago (not about science in particular, as Marx was a lover of science) in his base/superstructure argument. Science has been hijacked by Capitalism. Science needs to be free of Capitalist interests.
What I mean must look at the financial and biased interests behind our explanations of everything, always. We must ask Cui Bono? Look at the Medical Industry. It's all based on profit (pharmaceuticals, equipment etc..), patents and completly non-specific diagnostic tests and inappropriate and deleterious treatments based on one bad scientific theory on top of another which in the end support the plutocracy. It's based on the phony "germ theory of disease"
Nobody needs to pay people to spread the truth. But people ARE being paid to spread global warming DENIAL, and quite hefty sums. Stop reversing criticisms that fit better on you deniers onto those of us who counter-act your pseudo-science with facts.
Wtf are you even talking about?? Global warming is not about the Earth's surface being "warm" or "habitable for organic life"... it's about a historically and shockingly RAPID increase in GLOBAL temperatures that is and will surely cause mostly detrimental effects upon ecosystems, species, and even humans and our way of life. It's really a no-brainer, unless you have a pro-industry and, usually, right-wing (anti-science) agenda.
This is a good video. It helps to explain that the heat and cold highs and lows are only a little slice of the whole. The deviations might be wide, but it's the climate of the whole planet that tells the true story of CC....i.e., long term change. Weather is NOT climate....and climate today is still increasingly anthropogenic.
W/ the Chicken Little Committee it is alwasy the same. All heating trends are direct proof of AGW. All cooling trends are irrelevant. Could your lot possibly more obvious & blatant in your cherry picking data to suit yourselves? When the magician pulls the bird out of the sleeve of his shirt, we aren't supposed to see it. A little hint, when you want people to buy into your fraud, it helps not to let anyone actually see you perpetrating the fraud.
These deniers have an expiration date. When peak oil's effects begin to breakthrough to the xenophobic comfort club of America, it's members will suddenly praise energy conservatism.
Carbon tax is a disgusting crime against Humanity. CO2 whether man-made or otherwise doesn't drive global climate, it never has, it never will, the Sun does...
you used this temperature anomaly map in another video in another context not saying what it represents :)) you`re letting people know how stupid you are. be more careful.
I looked outside and it was cold in mid summer . see AMSU-atemperature. LOL GET this American Astronomical Society predicts little ice age. Cooling deniers continue to spout propaganda.
@greenman3610 OK never mind the window try satellite global temperature anomalies. Try the americam astronimical society predicting a little ice age. If you bother to look you will find that all levels of the atmospohere are cooling along with the oceans and volcanic activity is on the increase. The simpleton is actually youself but you are too stupid and arrogant to see it. Go on being a cooling denier, reality should set in eventually, Dumb ass.
@greenman3610 Your warming king has no clothes. Get out from behind the computer models and smell the rat that the Greenhouse theory is. Reality will eventually hit you, it may take longer in your case but reality will hit.
@greenman3610 Are you too ignorant to see the insanity of thinking that the climate can be turned downlike a room thermostat? Lower co2 and the temperature drops LOL . Get some brains. The perfect idiot!!
@chronDiggity If you cannot speak English you fascist pig then don't bother speaking at all. I am quivering in my shoes (not). The truth hurts because the whole scam is going down, now fuck off.
@david222444 Yes, reality will hit - when extreme weather caused by a huge increase in the latent heat of the land, atmosphere and oceans are a daily reality. But, it's a reality we'd rather not see.
Roy W. Spencer received his Ph.D. in meteorology at the University of Wisconsin-Madison in 1981. Before becoming a Principal Research Scientist at the University of Alabama in Huntsville in 2001, he was a Senior Scientist for Climate Studies at NASA’s Marshall Space Flight Center, where he and Dr. John Christy received NASA’s Exceptional Scientific Achievement Medal for their global temperature monitoring work with satellites.
unfortunately, since getting their degrees, Spencer and Christy have become most noted for being consistently, stubbornly, and finally, admittedly, wrong.
of course anyone who disagrees with you is a WITCH and should be burnt at the stake.
i am sure thats why he testified to congress.
Al Gore makes money from renewables....do you think he may lie to support his investments? John Christy makes a meagre living and nothing from oil companies of fossil fuel industries, which by the way will control renewables as well, so who do you believe?
of course it is all about belief.
enjoy the period of global cooling we are in now wont u!
what we can say from this data is that the majority of the cooling was in the mid teens to mid 20's where as the majority of the warming was in the single digit to mid teens vicinity.
The data that indicates long term change...lol. 30 years is short term in relation to the 4 billion years of the planets existence.
Get it....climate is made up of weather. As that weather cools it makes up a cooler climate.
no scales on your graph...what about a lack of warming from 1981 to now?
Can you take into account solar and space weather/seasonal changes? Because the entire solar system is heating up. Erratic weather in all other planets in our solar system. My biggest problem with the CO2 argument is that it does not factor in our Sun's activity what so ever. You simply can not ONLY look at the history of our planet within the last 100 years to make your case without factoring in the sun, and space weather.
@chestifie sorry just watched your video addressing this, very informative. I have been on the fence on this issue as it seems to be used as an excuse to tax. I was a full blown believe in man made global warming, but was swain in the last few years.
Can you write out how you would like the weather tobe if it's not going according to your plans? And, you are saying that if we were not here this would not happen.
as a new yorker, I been hearing that because of this harsh winter, climate change must be called off as its been relatively below average temperature-wise, well besides this weather's not climate thing I also saw on NOAA temp. data for NYC and that the cold periods late 1800s-early 1900's consisted of many days below 10F and occasionally sub 0F. Well we haven't seen much in the way of that in recent decades. Only once did it drop below 10F this winter and it hasnt been subzero here since 1994
It’s never been about "saving the planet" and it’s not about clean air or water, it IS about control. Control of how you live your life, the food you eat, the # of kids you can have, the house you can live in and the job that you can have. I heard ALL these same arguments when the eco nuts were saying global cooling back in the 70’s. They will manufacture ANY crisis to advance their agenda. “We can run your life better and more efficiently than you so shut-up and do and we say not as we do”.
@greenman3610 The scam was the cooling in the 70 and now it the warming in the 90's. Since you sound like Barnum talked about can I sell you some carbon credits, ocean from property out side of Yuma or even a bridge?
I read all the end of the world books back in the 70's and there is no different then the computer models that made those predictions, that have been proven wrong, and the dire predictions of man made global warming that are being made now. Can I put you down for 1000 tons of carbon credits or 20 acres of land outside of Yuma?
fool me once shame on me fool me twice shame on you. Your are not old enough to remember when these happened back in the 70's but I am. If you want to buy this bridge, carbon credits, its your money. I am not going to be taken twice. I do not want to cripple the economy on an unproven theory. I did read the emails and it is clear the these people did not want to have anyone in their business and did not want the money to stop no mater want they had to do.
@greenman3610 If you want to ride in an ox cart go for it. The only way that you are going to get enough energy to to run the world at its present population is to go the nuclear , fission or fusion, or put Solar Power Satellites in orbit and beam the energy back to earth. watch?v=iIXI_pl-Akk and watch?v=7O44WM1Q9H8&feature=related. if you reduced power to 30% of present levels with low teck renewables you will have the population bomb happening and all the things predicted by Paul R. Ehrlich
@greenman3610The 20% number is only the peak power it has been as low a 5% and an average of 10% over the last 5 years. The neighbor countries have to act like a battery because there is no way to store the energy. The tax rate of Denmark runs between 50 to 60%. The subsidy for wind power is ~500M per year and makes each wind worker subsidized to the tune of $140,000. So let’s keep the buggy whips, wind generators, industry going no matter what it costs the tax payer
@greenman3610 Not sure what you're saying, but: In and of itself, high arctic temperatures don't prove global climate change, but I am not a climate change denier. My son-in-law is a ecological planner and I have read many of his books. Global climate change is real and it is affected by our industrial age and man-made waste. I was just saying, I know many people are thinking the massive amount of snow we had this year disproves Global warming. Mindless. A testimoney to bad media.
I guess that's exactly what I'm saying. High or low temps in this or that place during this or that period by themselves prove nothing. It is the cumulative, global picture over long periods that matters.
The Earth has been cycling between warming and cooling since bacteria started reproducing on this planet. These same scientists that are NOW saying global warming said it was global cooling in the 70's and they were predicting we would have a glacier ice sheet down to the Dakotas by the year 2000. We have barely gotten out of the little Ice Age that started in the 1300's. This is all a mute point, Mans effect on the planet is like two fleas on a dog arguing over who gets to steer.
@greenman3610 I agree that both are scams, ice age and man made global warming. both are being push by a consensus of scientists, that are out for a buck.
@cupera1 oh come on you couldn't get a 93% of the world's scientists to all be involved in a scam. However, you can get 7% of man-instigated global warming deniers to agree. Corporations that stand to lose have done everything they can to prevent the public from learning the truth about global warming. Now that they can't keep the truth suppressed they are clamoring to find the best way to profit. That's what corporations do. Who's more likely to be scamming us?
About 20% of the heating is attributed to solar energy influence. People just can't get it through their heads (or don't want to) that or star isn't responsible for everything we're experiencing. Same goes for "the planets are all warming up" crock. It's toasty on Venus, so this must mean that 900F is cool with you? It's happening too fast to be called natural. It's unnatural.
Google--> Climate myths: Global warming is down to the Sun, not humans (New Scientist)
I`ve been watching a few astronomy shows, they say the sun is heating up. (solar maximum) I seen a comment on another GW vid the comment went something like mars and moons in the solar system are heating up dont think my 4x4 is doing that.. has anyone else herd of the solar maximum? and if other planets and moons are heating up?
@greenman3610 heard it on a show called universe (series running here). the comment (4x4) was from another youtube global warming vid not from a legitimate astronomy source, forgot the YT.
@greenman3610 Yes NASA, a govt. organization are the people to trust just like the U.N. Let's tax cow farts and CO2 and give a corrupt govt. that wages illegal wars, runs record deficits, and spies on it's own citizens more money. They will save the planet if only they could just get us to pay carbon taxes. This video is garbage by the way. The 1st map shows temps of 5-10 degrees on the Mexican border, colors it tan and then claims everything in that area is 10* higher than normal. Lol!
@greenman3610 OK, you got me there. I misread the map. I'm honest enough to give you that. I jumped to conclusions without properly analyzing your point. You win this time greenman!!! If it's real or not I still think taxing people more is a scam of epic proportions. Peace...
@greenman3610 Hey greenie, you referred me to some trustworthy organizations like NASA for proof of real climate date ... ha, ha ... do yourself a favour and Google for: NASA admits climate data not reliable ... hope you enjoy the very first 10 hits.
@oomblikkies there is a massive difference between an opinion blog and respected scientific reasoning. If you don't understand that difference then you are too stupid to even know what you don't know.
@Buckeyefarmer 95% of the CO2 emissions from cows actually come out of their mouths, not their arses. Much like most of the bullshit you are spouting.
So, the corporate media outlets and controlled science reports out of institutions such as the United Nations are selling a CO2 tax. Of course the only way to combat GW is to tax the people. The oil companies are still going to sell you gas because you don't have any alternative. GW is just the left-wing issue of the two party special interest monopoly. The big oil companies are still going to sell you gas and they will get special interest exemptions.
Now let's look at why record low temperatures are cited as counter evidence. GW cultists see record high temperatures, hurricanes, forest fires, or just about any weather related incident and they claim it's the effects of GW. BUT, when we have record cold and snow, they say that it is irrelevant and doesn't prove anything. They also only cite studies that adhere to their viewpoint. Studies that show falling temperatures are ignored or attacked as are scientists who disagree.
@zapatista512 Yes this video showed that if you can't think for yourself and don't understand the subject.. I've researched the science. I know CO2 driven climate change is a fraud. It's all about taxation and control. The same govt. that has sold us wars, patriot act, obama care, illegal wiretapping, record deficits, banker bailouts, etc., and you want to give the same govt. money for cow farts and carbon footprints? Not sure who's worse, the Bush cults or the Obama cults.
Comparing temperatures in 2008 is not climate - that is weather, If you compare 20-100 years - that is climate!
crzymount 1 week ago
I'm contacting my Federal Rep to try and get any and all time, money and expenses to this hoax 'global warming' scam ended. No Kyotos or anymore of this nonsense. So far so good as people do seem to be leaving this. Of course, just like the 'hole in the ozone' there will be another one of these 'chicken little' scams dreamed up by the Marxists for the next decade. but maybe 'Cry Wolf' is the better fable analogy here.
ElProximo 4 weeks ago
@ElProximo the fuck? Marxists? How the hell would THEY have any gain from convincing people to stop releasing their shit into the atmosphere?
Or maybe YOURE actually a Marxist trying to convince us that climate change is a myth to bring forth your marxist utopia D:.
Hey, this is fun. But not really constructive.
bigolol 4 weeks ago
@bigolol Don't play dumb. Unless you are fantastically ignorant or naive you would be well aware how socialists, lefties and even 'admitted' self-described Marxists in the West absolutely love and support, dedicate and almost 'live for' Co2-Global warming hoaxes. Obviously this is because their 'solution' is for government to take more control over big business. I'm not asking you. I'm teaching you. Don't reply. Just sit there knowing full well I'm bang-on the money and you know it.
ElProximo 3 weeks ago
@ElProximo
move slowly toward the door. Don't disagree or he might fling poo at you.
greenman3610 3 weeks ago
@greenman3610 XD. Love your videos by the way =)
bigolol 3 weeks ago
@ElProximo It's nice of you to teach me however this condescending tone seems kinda out of place. I am in fact not fully aware of it, so I'd really like you to open my eyes and present me some evidence for it- links to sites etc. To me it seems as if some americans just can't get over the fact that the cold war is over and now have nothing left to fear, so you think that somehow the marxists won after all and are now in your government. But please, feel free to convince me otherwise
bigolol 3 weeks ago
@bigolol Uh no, I won't be trying to convince you of anything or doing your homework (which amounts to opening your fucking eyes) but I won't be doing your simple 1st grader homework for you. BTW, have you ever noticed how many people in Climate Change Activist groups are those kind of Right-wing Capitalist Free Market 'Conservative' types? NO YOU DIDNT YOU ABSOLUTE POOP-FLINGING FUCKTARD. Wow. Don't be stupid and ask me to play along. Honestly, get real you phony
ElProximo 3 weeks ago
@ElProximo Well that obviously makes you the winner of this debate.
bigolol 3 weeks ago
@bigolol Real science, real investigation, rational thinking, investigating the hoax, definition games, propaganda and then smashing it with common sense is what makes me (and everyone else) the 'winner' of this debate. Enjoy warming - it produces life. It is not going to start or stop by controlling corporations. Go find your next 'chicken little' scam, join the junior marxists disguised as environmenalists. Will expose that one too.
ElProximo 3 weeks ago
@ElProximo I have no doubt you will
bigolol 3 weeks ago
@ElProximo you have common sense? where?
Aanthanur 3 weeks ago
@ElProximo
duck! he's goin' off!!
greenman3610 3 weeks ago
does not mean man made climate change. Warming has occurred in the past and we are coming out of a cool phase, so naturally we have a warming trend. Also the other planets in the solar system are warming so its the sun that's doing the warming a slight rise in co2 which is still a trace element let alone the even smaller amount humans contribute doesn't mean a thing
vmgqie 4 weeks ago
@vmgqie
"warming on other planets" nonsense
watch?v=BSXgiml5UwM
Denialist logic on this as follows.
a. We can't tell if its warming on earth
b. We know with absolute certainty its warming on pluto.
greenman3610 4 weeks ago
@greenman3610 So your saying that big burning ball in the sky,has nothing to do with warming on earth. So you don't agree the sun has been getting stronger as time goes by. You really are a one way thinking nazi alarmist and that reference turnout to be bogus so you just make up shit
vmgqie 4 weeks ago
@vmgqie
see my two most recent videos, discussion the sun and the general cluelessness of deniers on this point. The sun would have a lot to do with warming if it was putting out more heat - but its not. We can measure this quite well with modern satellite technology. Why is that hard to understand?
watch?v=pAx6j625iy4
watch?v=IQHqgdvXTxE
greenman3610 4 weeks ago
@greenman3610 I have seen recently that the sun output has risen that explains why the solar system has shown signs of temperature rises. You greenman (more like bullshitman) were looking at the data the wrong way round. I suggest turning the data the right way and then look again and you will find that the suns output has risen. Regards from nonbelieverman
vmgqie 4 weeks ago
@vmgqie
"its the sun" nonsense treated here, for anyone interested
watch?v=pAx6j625iy4
watch?v=IQHqgdvXTxE
watch?v=LMA9D-ZWwrg
greenman3610 4 weeks ago
@greenman3610 All your facts are propaganda, independent research has shown a rise in the suns output. Please people don't believe a word of what this fraud (greenman) is saying he is quoting corrupt data its all smoke and mirrors
vmgqie 3 weeks ago
@vmgqie can you give me a source to this scientific publication pls?
Aanthanur 3 weeks ago
@Aanthanur Dr Sami Solanki of Max Plank Institute for Solar System Research in Germany. Google it and check for yourself. The sun has been getting brighter and producing more heat and that concurries with my observations, have a good day. regards from nonbelieverman.
vmgqie 3 weeks ago
@vmgqie in witch year was his study published? in google shoolar i can find some of his papers, but those i started to read dont confirm what you say. so i would like to know wich aper exactly, you got the tile and year?
Aanthanur 3 weeks ago
@vmgqie also interesting is to note that he himself thinks Humans are the main reason, but he does indeed belief the sun might also have more influence than generally beliefed.
Aanthanur 3 weeks ago
@Aanthanur HE is probably scared of the whole global warming nazi machine.He throw humans main reason just so his career is not destroyed by you lot hateful nazi bastards
vmgqie 3 weeks ago
@vmgqie a quote from Max Plank Institute :
Studies at the Max Planck Institute for Solar System Research reveal: solar activity affects the climate but plays only a minor role in the current global warming
Aanthanur 3 weeks ago
@Aanthanur thats according to you I refute that on observation
vmgqie 3 weeks ago
@vmgqie However, researchers at the MPS have shown that the Sun can be responsible for, at most, only a small part of the warming over the last 20-30 years.
Aanthanur 3 weeks ago
@Aanthanur They took the measured and calculated variations in the solar brightness over the last 150 years and compared them to the temperature of the Earth. Although the changes in the two values tend to follow each other for roughly the first 120 years, the Earth’s temperature has risen dramatically in the last 30 years while the solar brightness has not appreciably increased in this time.
Aanthanur 3 weeks ago
@Aanthanur the sun has been getting brighter and the output has increased that has shown greenman to be just another alarmist nazi bullshit artist
vmgqie 3 weeks ago
Comment removed
Aanthanur 3 weeks ago
@Aanthanur greenman was saying in his bullshit video's it can't be the sun, sun output had been falling these scientists are saying sun has been increasing output which concurs with observation so what you got to say now
vmgqie 3 weeks ago
@vmgqie so to mee it seems that you have misunderstood his studies.
Aanthanur 3 weeks ago
@Aanthanur The sun has increased its brightness and output, that's not misunderstanding that's catching greenman being an alarmist nazi bullshit artist. your in a cult like Scientology do yourself a favour get out while you can
vmgqie 3 weeks ago
@vmgqie Just how large this role is, must still be investigated, since, according to our latest knowledge on the variations of the solar magnetic field, the significant increase in the Earth’s temperature since 1980 is indeed to be ascribed to the greenhouse effect caused by carbon dioxide," says Prof. Sami K. Solanki, solar physicist and director at the Max Planck Institute for Solar System Research.
Aanthanur 3 weeks ago
@Aanthanur the sun has increased its output and brightness chew on that. Your religion its easy to destroy because it's made of lies and when you lie you are found out
vmgqie 3 weeks ago
@vmgqie found another quote, but only in German: “Ein wichtiger Faktor ist mittlerweile die globale Erwärmung, die wir für die Studie herausgenommen haben. Da diese in den vergangenen 30 Jahren 0,4 Grad betrug, während die Sonne jedoch schwächer geworden ist, ist diese sicher zum Großteil nicht auf die Sonne zurückzuführen”, so Solanki.
Aanthanur 3 weeks ago
@Aanthanur I don't read german But i can guess what's it says global warming is a scam made up by alarmist nazi dogooders
vmgqie 3 weeks ago
@vmgqie Sami Solanki is actually saying the oppisite of what you claimed. the sun activity was lower in the last decades. How come?
Aanthanur 3 weeks ago
@Aanthanur thats not what he said he said the sun's output and brightness has increased except it or not
vmgqie 3 weeks ago
@vmgqie poor guy, i feel sorry for you.
Aanthanur 3 weeks ago
@Aanthanur Is that all you have to say, poor guy I feel sorry for you.What sort of bullshit is that. If I can FIND ARGUMENTS AGAINST GLOBAL WARMING IN 5 MINUTES ON GOOGLE WHAT DOES SAY ABOUT YOUR THEORY. I'll tell you for free its bullshit from top to bottom. In fact I feel sorry for you dickhead
vmgqie 3 weeks ago
@vmgqie sorry man, i dont see a point in debating with you, you are obviously a troll or a very deluded crazy person.
Aanthanur 3 weeks ago
@Aanthanur Could it be your piss off because I found a argument against man made global warming and these stupid crock of the week video's from bullshitman oh I mean greenman. That's why you don't wont to continue, no worries, I have won another debate thanks for proving global warming is a crock of shit
vmgqie 3 weeks ago
@vmgqie i highly doubt you ever won a debate or even had a real debate.
you have not provided an argmuent against AGW, your source you cited does actually say the opposite of you. His reasearch shows that you are wrong. extremely wrong.wh
ats next? you will claim he faked his data and evidence just to conform with those "warming nazis" ?and will you do that again without a shred of evidence?
Aanthanur 3 weeks ago
@Aanthanur Well isn't that typical of your breed of alarmist. Dr Sami Solaki research said the sun had become brighter and the output increased, you even said that a few statements back and now your saying the opposite.So that's what happen's to any proof against man made global warming you turn it around and try make it say something else just like these stupid crock of the week video's, that's not science. Did not learn a thing from climategate also I won you just deny it, now your the denier
vmgqie 3 weeks ago
@vmgqie you are a blatant liar. I debunkd your Solaki claim, he did not say that at all, and his research does not support your claims in the slightest. you'r trolling is just laughable.
Aanthanur 3 weeks ago
@Aanthanur Are you calling me a liar, are calling me a liar. I Leave lying to you alarmist nazi and not to mention greenman who should change his name to bullshitman I debunk your claims of debunking my claims. Dr Sami Solaki did say the sun's output and brightness has increased and you said ( at the MPS have shown that the sun can be responsible for, at most only a small part of the warming over the last 20-30 year's.)YOUR WORD'S are you denying this, your the denier and a sore loser PRICK
vmgqie 3 weeks ago
@vmgqie
solanki 2004:
"solar variability is unlikely to have been the dominant cause of the strong warming during the past three decades".
greenman3610 3 weeks ago
@greenman3610 hay bullshitman ho I mean greenman you make a very poor scientist. That what happens when your trying to back a false theory, that's based on one small truth and the rest is made of lies and distortions.But good luck with that you alarmist nazi
vmgqie 3 weeks ago
@vmgqie
that's your answer?
greenman3610 3 weeks ago
@greenman3610 Dr Sami Solnki said the sun is responsible for some of the warming and I also that is debatable more like all the warming because co2 does not drive climate but you don't listen or you ignore my comments.See that's what alarmist nazi do, they ignore evidence wont debate scientist, who are deniers and there are plenty. Your just caught up in this false religion, invest your time and money in something worth while. Man made global warming is a con and we know it, give it up
vmgqie 3 weeks ago
@vmgqie
solanki 2004:
"solar variability is unlikely to have been the dominant cause of the strong warming during the past three decades".
greenman3610 3 weeks ago
@vmgqie
solanki 2004: "solar variability is unlikely to have been the dominant cause of the strong warming during the past three decades".
greenman3610 3 weeks ago
@greenman3610Solar variability is unlikely to have caused strong warming.Your words, so its caused some warming how much is debatable. In your video's you say the sun has caused no warming and now you say its caused some warming your words.Your contradicting yourself not very scientific but you alarmist dismiss any evidence that doesn't suit you and the global warming bullshit theory you wonder why no one believes your propaganda.Your video's should be called climate change is a load of crock
vmgqie 3 weeks ago
@vmgqie
solanki 2004 -
" "solar variability is unlikely to have been the dominant cause of the strong warming during the past three decades"."
greenman3610 3 weeks ago
@greenman3610 the sun's output has increased, but that doesn't fit the propaganda does it , because there's nothing we can do about it, and you said on your video the sun output was low, wrong wrong and wrong again just like all your bullshit
vmgqie 3 weeks ago
@vmgqie
solanki 2004: "solar variability is unlikely to have been the dominant cause of the strong warming during the past three decades".
greenman3610 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Climatology is not even a legitimate science like Meteorology is. Some Meteorologists may study climate but they are not Climatologists. Capitalism creates a lot of new science fields that are beneficial to powerful profitable class interests. Financial interest behind science is not an irrelevant issue and needs to be discusssed along with scientific debate. Look at Al Gore and Bill Clinton. They wery quite cozy with Nuclear in their home state. Nuclear and oil are behind AGW
dialectical44 1 month ago
Comment removed
dialectical44 1 month ago
And what the fuck does this "crock of the week" nonsense seen in Atheist videos have to do with having a real debate about Climate variation? I'm so sick of hearing the term from these "positivists' "$cience for the win " types who are effectively idealist.
dialectical44 1 month ago
Climate creates the weather!! No scientists in the world will be able explain why is it carbon dioxide is changing the weather like that. Before they were claiming carbon dioxide heat trapping gas what about the cold what they can say about that? If truly they want to know how carbon dioxide effects our weather I do have an answer for them & very accurate to.
Levon9404 1 month ago
Outbound IR does not melt Arctic ice, or cause glaciers to break off. It cools. It's thermal energy leaving point A for B. That's the opposite of B inputting energy into A.
Because of entropy, whatever outgoing IR is absorbed by a CO2 molecule at 3km up won't boomerang back to the emitter. Some will convert to kinetic, the rest will flow to systems of lower energy state.
RenoDoctor 2 months ago
Real greenhouses block sunlight warmed air from escaping to the outside. The floor does not heat the inside and no glass pane blocks outgoing IR.
RenoDoctor 2 months ago
The enhanced greenhouse effect is based on an old defunct hypothesis how greenhouses work. In the IPCC’s world sunlight hits the earth; IR emits from the surface; trace gases in the cooler troposphere absorb certain spectra and some emits back to the warmer surface. A total reversal of the laws of thermodynamics.
RenoDoctor 2 months ago
Temperature, unless mechanically influenced, naturally and irreversibly flows hot to cold - ice cubes don’t warm the coffee. It’s impossible for lower energy systems to heat systems of higher energy and HES to cool LES, unless externally influenced. If did, after boiling a pot of water and turning off the element the water would never cool to room temperature.
RenoDoctor 2 months ago
Anybody notice that this video maker, in place of explaining how human activity warms the Earth's surface, attacks people who oppose his purported views?
Real scientists, who know their subject matter, never partake in that fallacy.
It ought to go without saying that ever since the Earth has had an atmosphere that the climate has undergone continuous change since then. Making the term "Climate Change" about 5 billion years old.
RenoDoctor 2 months ago
The habitable surface of Earth is about 15 Celsius yearly average. How and why is this?
One of the originating energy inputs is solar radiation. There's a second, and it isn't surface re-emitted infrared. Does solar radiation require gas molecules to manifest as 'heat'? No. The thermosphere temperature peaks at about 1500C and there are very few molecules of any sort up there, what few there is are kilometers apart.
RenoDoctor 2 months ago
Leave your car out in the summer sun for an hour or so and then touch the hood , it's warm. Sometimes ouch warm. That's infrared energy. Now touch the ground, even if asphalt. It's nowhere near the hood's warmth. Did the ground temperature make the car hood hot to the touch? No. If you raise your hand off the car hood does it get hotter the higher you raise? No. None of the hood's infrared makes a u-turn and comes back down to warm the top of your hand. It goes up while EM comes down.
RenoDoctor 2 months ago
@RenoDoctor greenman3610 isn't a scientist but he does his research very well. But there's no need for you to argue with an amateur like him.
Head on over to RealClimateDOTorg and show THOSE know-nothings just how much you know. Do come back to let us know how you showed them how little they understand - we'll be waiting.
bannor99 1 month ago
@bannor99 Well that's just it. Nearly all of these people are freelance writers, PR hacks or lobbyists funded by the market earnings of hugely wealthy charitable foundations to spread the global warming dogma, which has no supporting scientific evidence. Many of these foundations have substantial shares in 'green' retail merchandise and services.
RenoDoctor 1 month ago
@RenoDoctor If you think there's no scientific support, you haven't been reading the actual science. "Hugely wealthy", "green shares"?? The REAL BIG money is in the hands of the business-as-usual crowd.
Roll the clock back 40-50 years and you'll find that cigarettes don't do bad things and "most doctors" agree they might even be good for you.
bannor99 1 month ago
@bannor99 'Scientific' regards ultra cynical attitude and methodologies employed to distinguish truth from fiction. 50 years ago predecessor charitable foundations were alarming about an imminent ice age. Tobacco PR, exactly the same PR propaganda employed by AGW, dates back to Edward Bernays, just post-WWI.
RenoDoctor 1 month ago
@RenoDoctor
wow. exactly backwards.
70s ice age: -- see
watch?v=XB3S0fnOr0M
then google
addiction incorporated - the tobacco funded roots of climate denial
greenman3610 1 month ago
@greenman3610 Avg. temp began an annual downward trend starting around 1940, all blamed on human CO2, rebounding by the ‘80s, the increase also blamed on human CO2. The first AG-cooling academic paper appeared about '63. The '80s was the nuclear winter sham, and AGW officially replaced both by the '95 Al Gore, Jr show.
Climate scientists have no connection to tobacco co.s or corrupt US doctors.
RenoDoctor 1 month ago
@RenoDoctor Wrong. A PROPER "skeptical" attitude is required of a scientist; what is exhibited by the premier DENIALists is distortion and contrarian cherrypicking. I have yet to hear an explanation from Pat Michaels as to why he chose the LEAST likely scenario from Hansen's '88 projections
bannor99 1 month ago
@bannor99
Wrong. A good scientist will always try to prove a theory wrong. This is what AGW scientists have failed to do. You "peer review" people always accuse real science of "cherrypicking" when that is exactly what is being done in "official" commoditized science.for profit. Climate variation is caused by the Milankovitch cycles. To reduce this amazing and varied climaate of earth to one parameter, co2, is unreasonable
dialectical44 1 month ago
@dialectical44 Aren't you then reducing it to a single parameter yourself? You're essentially saying it's the sun and nothing else. But without any GHGs, we would be living in a frozen spaceball, Milankovitch cycles or not.
Also, a lot of work has gone into finding other explanations - no other even mildly plausible explanation has been found, although a lot of wild conjectures have been made, which is the whole point of greenman's debunking
bannor99 1 month ago
@bannor99
The sun has a much bigger influence on the Earth than the C02. I woud Malenkovitch cycles are more than plausable. Most high caliber scientists agree that it is not Co2. We must look at the interests behind the proponents of this C02 theory. I have a couple videos of MIT's Richard Lindzen tha tmight help.
dialectical44 1 month ago
@bannor99
What I mean to say is that outside of the Milenkovitch Theory we can't reducee it to this or that factor. Many other factors have local influences on termpreature including Co2. Even wheat fields effect local temperatures by reflecting the sun. I find it puzzling that people don't want to see the financial incentives behind C02. Many people don't realize that c02 is NOT pollution.
dialectical44 1 month ago
@RenoDoctor
Good point!! Don't forget the Nuclear Industry and Oil companies. They were behind it from the beginning. Gore and Clinton were friends of the Nuclear industry in their home state before they got into the white house. The US has the licenses to build Nuclear Plants worldwide. Multi trillion dollar The Carbon trading deriative scheme will create haardship on all via taxes for a long time to come. I am one of the few Sociaist/Communists speaking up. Check out my playlist
dialectical44 1 month ago
@dialectical44 Honest climate science is bereft of political ideology. Thanks for the response, but science is about the natural universe.
RenoDoctor 1 month ago
@RenoDoctor
That's my point. Our science institutions are run by weatlhy classes. Science, especiall after the Bayh-Dole act(1980) is in the hands of very powerful interests that gain great advantage from it's development. Marx and Engels spelled this out over a centruy ago (not about science in particular, as Marx was a lover of science) in his base/superstructure argument. Science has been hijacked by Capitalism. Science needs to be free of Capitalist interests.
dialectical44 1 month ago
@RenoDoctor
That's my point. Our science institutions are run by weatlhy classes. Science, especiall after the Bayh-Dole act(1980) is in the hands of very powerful interests that gain great advantage from it's development. Marx and Engels spelled this out over a centruy ago (not about science in particular, as Marx was a lover of science) in his base/superstructure argument. Science has been hijacked by Capitalism. Science needs to be free of Capitalist interests.
dialectical44 1 month ago
@RenoDoctor
What I mean must look at the financial and biased interests behind our explanations of everything, always. We must ask Cui Bono? Look at the Medical Industry. It's all based on profit (pharmaceuticals, equipment etc..), patents and completly non-specific diagnostic tests and inappropriate and deleterious treatments based on one bad scientific theory on top of another which in the end support the plutocracy. It's based on the phony "germ theory of disease"
dialectical44 1 month ago
Who pays you to make these videos, Peter?
RenoDoctor 2 months ago
@RenoDoctor
Nobody needs to pay people to spread the truth. But people ARE being paid to spread global warming DENIAL, and quite hefty sums. Stop reversing criticisms that fit better on you deniers onto those of us who counter-act your pseudo-science with facts.
IngeniousEpithet 2 months ago
@IngeniousEpithet
Who's denying that the Earth's surface, on average, is not warm? If it weren't wouldn't be habitable for organic life.
RenoDoctor 2 months ago
@RenoDoctor
Wtf are you even talking about?? Global warming is not about the Earth's surface being "warm" or "habitable for organic life"... it's about a historically and shockingly RAPID increase in GLOBAL temperatures that is and will surely cause mostly detrimental effects upon ecosystems, species, and even humans and our way of life. It's really a no-brainer, unless you have a pro-industry and, usually, right-wing (anti-science) agenda.
IngeniousEpithet 2 months ago
This is a good video. It helps to explain that the heat and cold highs and lows are only a little slice of the whole. The deviations might be wide, but it's the climate of the whole planet that tells the true story of CC....i.e., long term change. Weather is NOT climate....and climate today is still increasingly anthropogenic.
followthefleet1 3 months ago
W/ the Chicken Little Committee it is alwasy the same. All heating trends are direct proof of AGW. All cooling trends are irrelevant. Could your lot possibly more obvious & blatant in your cherry picking data to suit yourselves? When the magician pulls the bird out of the sleeve of his shirt, we aren't supposed to see it. A little hint, when you want people to buy into your fraud, it helps not to let anyone actually see you perpetrating the fraud.
VictorLepanto 3 months ago
These deniers have an expiration date. When peak oil's effects begin to breakthrough to the xenophobic comfort club of America, it's members will suddenly praise energy conservatism.
theloniousunra 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Carbon tax is a disgusting crime against Humanity. CO2 whether man-made or otherwise doesn't drive global climate, it never has, it never will, the Sun does...
The Great Global Warming Swindle [Full Film]
watch?v=T8KgbUvsC_o
Galv140577 5 months ago
you used this temperature anomaly map in another video in another context not saying what it represents :)) you`re letting people know how stupid you are. be more careful.
andreiuta171 6 months ago
@andreiuta171
all of my videos are well referenced.
you're bloviating without making a single specific reference that can be checked.
you're letting people know how sloppy you are.
greenman3610 6 months ago
Comment removed
andreiuta171 6 months ago
The real face of the global warming cult is on my BG, Take a look at the real face of the Green Nazis. The cultist also has a PhD. LOL
HerecomestheGrump 7 months ago
I looked outside and it was cold in mid summer . see AMSU-atemperature. LOL GET this American Astronomical Society predicts little ice age. Cooling deniers continue to spout propaganda.
david222444 7 months ago
@david222444
"Ah looked out mah winder, an' it wuz cold, so there cain't be no clah-mut change."
I repeat this constantly, and people take me to task for being over the top, and caricaturing climate deniers.
But no, they really are that simple. thanks for demonstrating.
greenman3610 7 months ago
@greenman3610 OK never mind the window try satellite global temperature anomalies. Try the americam astronimical society predicting a little ice age. If you bother to look you will find that all levels of the atmospohere are cooling along with the oceans and volcanic activity is on the increase. The simpleton is actually youself but you are too stupid and arrogant to see it. Go on being a cooling denier, reality should set in eventually, Dumb ass.
david222444 7 months ago
@david222444
Dude, you are giving me more material.
Please document "american astronimical society" predicting little ice age.
actually, you can see my blog post on this non-story by googling
"Graph of the Day: What if the Sun Goes into another Maunder Minimum?"
those curious about what the data says can check NASA by googling
nasa key indicators
greenman3610 7 months ago
@greenman3610 Meanwhile the World cools.
david222444 7 months ago
@david222444
yew lookin out yer winder agin?
google
nasa key indicators
greenman3610 7 months ago
@greenman3610 Your warming king has no clothes. Get out from behind the computer models and smell the rat that the Greenhouse theory is. Reality will eventually hit you, it may take longer in your case but reality will hit.
david222444 7 months ago
@david222444
zero evidence, demonstrated ignorance, coupled with complete certainty.
the perfect denier.
greenman3610 7 months ago
@greenman3610 Are you too ignorant to see the insanity of thinking that the climate can be turned downlike a room thermostat? Lower co2 and the temperature drops LOL . Get some brains. The perfect idiot!!
david222444 7 months ago
@david222444
dude you got owned. just stfu
chronDiggity 2 months ago
@chronDiggity If you cannot speak English you fascist pig then don't bother speaking at all. I am quivering in my shoes (not). The truth hurts because the whole scam is going down, now fuck off.
david222444 2 months ago
@david222444
typical denier lol
chronDiggity 2 months ago
@david222444 Yes, reality will hit - when extreme weather caused by a huge increase in the latent heat of the land, atmosphere and oceans are a daily reality. But, it's a reality we'd rather not see.
bannor99 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The last decade was the hottest on modern record. - WMO
The benefits of a price on carbon outweigh the costs several times over. -Stern Review on the Economics of Climate Change
The warming trend over 1970 to 2001 is greater than warming from both 1860 to 1880 and 1910 to 1940. GISS/ NOAA
checkyoursources 9 months ago
dont worry NASA scientist says its ok.
Roy W. Spencer received his Ph.D. in meteorology at the University of Wisconsin-Madison in 1981. Before becoming a Principal Research Scientist at the University of Alabama in Huntsville in 2001, he was a Senior Scientist for Climate Studies at NASA’s Marshall Space Flight Center, where he and Dr. John Christy received NASA’s Exceptional Scientific Achievement Medal for their global temperature monitoring work with satellites.
dont worry, warm is good
arsjth 9 months ago
@arsjth
unfortunately, since getting their degrees, Spencer and Christy have become most noted for being consistently, stubbornly, and finally, admittedly, wrong.
greenman3610 9 months ago
@greenman3610
of course anyone who disagrees with you is a WITCH and should be burnt at the stake.
i am sure thats why he testified to congress.
Al Gore makes money from renewables....do you think he may lie to support his investments? John Christy makes a meagre living and nothing from oil companies of fossil fuel industries, which by the way will control renewables as well, so who do you believe?
of course it is all about belief.
enjoy the period of global cooling we are in now wont u!
arsjth 9 months ago
@arsjth
he turned me into a newt.
greenman3610 9 months ago
what we can say from this data is that the majority of the cooling was in the mid teens to mid 20's where as the majority of the warming was in the single digit to mid teens vicinity.
The data that indicates long term change...lol. 30 years is short term in relation to the 4 billion years of the planets existence.
Get it....climate is made up of weather. As that weather cools it makes up a cooler climate.
no scales on your graph...what about a lack of warming from 1981 to now?
arsjth 9 months ago
Thanks for the incessant music. I learnt fuck all.
rikda 11 months ago
Can you take into account solar and space weather/seasonal changes? Because the entire solar system is heating up. Erratic weather in all other planets in our solar system. My biggest problem with the CO2 argument is that it does not factor in our Sun's activity what so ever. You simply can not ONLY look at the history of our planet within the last 100 years to make your case without factoring in the sun, and space weather.
chestifie 11 months ago
@chestifie sorry just watched your video addressing this, very informative. I have been on the fence on this issue as it seems to be used as an excuse to tax. I was a full blown believe in man made global warming, but was swain in the last few years.
chestifie 11 months ago
@chestifie
you'd probably like
watch?v=uE6at2IEUOU
watch?v=cqBURjOdOG8
watch?v=yLYqzIhhT6o
watch?v=pSdnycHfLnQ
the "warming on other planets" one is here
watch?v=BSXgiml5UwM
greenman3610 11 months ago
@chestifie "My biggest problem with the CO2 argument is that it does not factor in our Sun's activity what so ever." That ain't so. Who told you so?
TaterGumfries 10 months ago
Can you write out how you would like the weather tobe if it's not going according to your plans? And, you are saying that if we were not here this would not happen.
steaksteve 11 months ago
as a new yorker, I been hearing that because of this harsh winter, climate change must be called off as its been relatively below average temperature-wise, well besides this weather's not climate thing I also saw on NOAA temp. data for NYC and that the cold periods late 1800s-early 1900's consisted of many days below 10F and occasionally sub 0F. Well we haven't seen much in the way of that in recent decades. Only once did it drop below 10F this winter and it hasnt been subzero here since 1994
metsfreak4life 11 months ago
That dramatic music you use makes your case for you. The only people it doesn't work on are morons, right?
356pla 11 months ago
@356pla
you got me. That's exactly right.
greenman3610 11 months ago
ive never seen 10dg in ca ever
wildspok 11 months ago
It’s never been about "saving the planet" and it’s not about clean air or water, it IS about control. Control of how you live your life, the food you eat, the # of kids you can have, the house you can live in and the job that you can have. I heard ALL these same arguments when the eco nuts were saying global cooling back in the 70’s. They will manufacture ANY crisis to advance their agenda. “We can run your life better and more efficiently than you so shut-up and do and we say not as we do”.
cupera1 11 months ago
@cupera1
"cooling in the seventies" nonsense
watch?v=XB3S0fnOr0M
I'm really trying to save you guys some embarrassment by making all this info available. but you have to watch it first.
Ignorance hurts. I'm here to help.
greenman3610 11 months ago
@greenman3610 The scam was the cooling in the 70 and now it the warming in the 90's. Since you sound like Barnum talked about can I sell you some carbon credits, ocean from property out side of Yuma or even a bridge?
cupera1 11 months ago
@cupera1
it's the continued refusal of deniers to actually watch the videos and question their Glenn Beck talking points that makes me look smarter than I am.
"70s cooling" nonsense.
watch?v=XB3S0fnOr0M
This is like shooting fish in a barrel. It's not even fair.
greenman3610 11 months ago
@greenman3610
I read all the end of the world books back in the 70's and there is no different then the computer models that made those predictions, that have been proven wrong, and the dire predictions of man made global warming that are being made now. Can I put you down for 1000 tons of carbon credits or 20 acres of land outside of Yuma?
cupera1 11 months ago
@cupera1
" read all the end of the world books back in the 70's"
sounds like you are as gullible now as you were then.
greenman3610 11 months ago
@greenman3610
fool me once shame on me fool me twice shame on you. Your are not old enough to remember when these happened back in the 70's but I am. If you want to buy this bridge, carbon credits, its your money. I am not going to be taken twice. I do not want to cripple the economy on an unproven theory. I did read the emails and it is clear the these people did not want to have anyone in their business and did not want the money to stop no mater want they had to do.
cupera1 11 months ago
@cupera1
too late. We already crippled the economy by deciding that wars for fossil fuel were the way to keep it going.
Now we have to rebuild it. Renewables are the way. The country that runs on free energy will dominate the new century.
greenman3610 11 months ago
@greenman3610 If you want to ride in an ox cart go for it. The only way that you are going to get enough energy to to run the world at its present population is to go the nuclear , fission or fusion, or put Solar Power Satellites in orbit and beam the energy back to earth. watch?v=iIXI_pl-Akk and watch?v=7O44WM1Q9H8&feature=related. if you reduced power to 30% of present levels with low teck renewables you will have the population bomb happening and all the things predicted by Paul R. Ehrlich
cupera1 11 months ago
@cupera1
hmmm
Denmark is 20 percent wind. Have not noticed an increase in ox carts there.
No doubt you would have argued for continued subsidies to buggy whip manufacturers a hundred years ago.
"You can go back to riding mules...."
greenman3610 11 months ago
@greenman3610The 20% number is only the peak power it has been as low a 5% and an average of 10% over the last 5 years. The neighbor countries have to act like a battery because there is no way to store the energy. The tax rate of Denmark runs between 50 to 60%. The subsidy for wind power is ~500M per year and makes each wind worker subsidized to the tune of $140,000. So let’s keep the buggy whips, wind generators, industry going no matter what it costs the tax payer
cupera1 11 months ago
@cupera1
sorry, completely wrong. The 20 percent is the percent of total kwh consumed.
The storage issue is completely bogus.
for more on wind
watch?v=llIbjC49Fjs
watch?v=WO3V2uXTM6k
greenman3610 11 months ago
@greenman3610 Wind turbines. The new perpetual motion/energy device.
No input. All output.
You're an Asshole, greenbitch.
356pla 11 months ago
@greenman3610 Are you closer to being a Capitalist, or a Socialist?
356pla 11 months ago
yep all kinds of people are telling me no climate change see all this snow proves it
bashia 11 months ago
@bashia
then what do the historically high arctic temperatures prove?
greenman3610 11 months ago
@greenman3610 Not sure what you're saying, but: In and of itself, high arctic temperatures don't prove global climate change, but I am not a climate change denier. My son-in-law is a ecological planner and I have read many of his books. Global climate change is real and it is affected by our industrial age and man-made waste. I was just saying, I know many people are thinking the massive amount of snow we had this year disproves Global warming. Mindless. A testimoney to bad media.
bashia 11 months ago
@bashia
I guess that's exactly what I'm saying. High or low temps in this or that place during this or that period by themselves prove nothing. It is the cumulative, global picture over long periods that matters.
greenman3610 11 months ago
@greenman3610 Thanks for being one of the sensible informed ones.
bashia 11 months ago
The Earth has been cycling between warming and cooling since bacteria started reproducing on this planet. These same scientists that are NOW saying global warming said it was global cooling in the 70's and they were predicting we would have a glacier ice sheet down to the Dakotas by the year 2000. We have barely gotten out of the little Ice Age that started in the 1300's. This is all a mute point, Mans effect on the planet is like two fleas on a dog arguing over who gets to steer.
cupera1 1 year ago
@cupera1
"70s ice age" crock
watch?v=XB3S0fnOr0M
always best to watch all the vids before you post something silly like this.
Ignorance hurts. I'm here to help.
greenman3610 1 year ago
@greenman3610 I agree that both are scams, ice age and man made global warming. both are being push by a consensus of scientists, that are out for a buck.
cupera1 1 year ago
@cupera1 oh come on you couldn't get a 93% of the world's scientists to all be involved in a scam. However, you can get 7% of man-instigated global warming deniers to agree. Corporations that stand to lose have done everything they can to prevent the public from learning the truth about global warming. Now that they can't keep the truth suppressed they are clamoring to find the best way to profit. That's what corporations do. Who's more likely to be scamming us?
bashia 11 months ago
@cupera1 That's MOOT point, and so is YOUR point!
chigong980 1 year ago
@chigong980
Global cooling predicted in 1890's
Global warming predicted in 1930's
Global cooling predicted in 1970's
Global warming predicted in 1990's
what ever it takes to sell a newspaper.
I fell for the scam in the 70's,fool me once shame on me fool me twice shame on you, why do you want to fall for this scam now?
cupera1 1 year ago
@cupera1
"in the 70s, they predicted cooling" crock here
watch?v=XB3S0fnOr0M
Interesting that during all that time, it continued to warm.
Now it's the deniers who desperately predict cooling.
And you're going to believe that scam now?
greenman3610 1 year ago
@greenman3610 If you are trying to prove that Barnum was right you just did. Can I sell you some carbon credits?
cupera1 1 year ago
About 20% of the heating is attributed to solar energy influence. People just can't get it through their heads (or don't want to) that or star isn't responsible for everything we're experiencing. Same goes for "the planets are all warming up" crock. It's toasty on Venus, so this must mean that 900F is cool with you? It's happening too fast to be called natural. It's unnatural.
Google--> Climate myths: Global warming is down to the Sun, not humans (New Scientist)
frededison 1 year ago
Some of you graphs seem to have unlabeled axis... >_>
Also nice to have links to other sources to ref.
LavaV2 1 year ago
I`ve been watching a few astronomy shows, they say the sun is heating up. (solar maximum) I seen a comment on another GW vid the comment went something like mars and moons in the solar system are heating up dont think my 4x4 is doing that.. has anyone else herd of the solar maximum? and if other planets and moons are heating up?
me001ist 1 year ago
@me001ist
You didn't see that on any legitimate astronomy source.
per NASA, we are just coming out of the deepest solar minimum in a century. Nevertheless, 2009 and 2010 are 2 of the warmest years on record.
google
nasa deep solar minimum
and google
nasa 2010 warmest year
also, re "planets warming up", see
watch?v=BSXgiml5UwM
greenman3610 1 year ago
@greenman3610 heard it on a show called universe (series running here). the comment (4x4) was from another youtube global warming vid not from a legitimate astronomy source, forgot the YT.
me001ist 1 year ago
@greenman3610 Yes NASA, a govt. organization are the people to trust just like the U.N. Let's tax cow farts and CO2 and give a corrupt govt. that wages illegal wars, runs record deficits, and spies on it's own citizens more money. They will save the planet if only they could just get us to pay carbon taxes. This video is garbage by the way. The 1st map shows temps of 5-10 degrees on the Mexican border, colors it tan and then claims everything in that area is 10* higher than normal. Lol!
Buckeyefarmer 1 year ago
@Buckeyefarmer
you need to do a little more reading and find out the difference between temp and temp anomaly.
the graph says "Departure from Normal' -- that should be a clue.
Honest, I try to dumb these down as best I can, but for some simpletons, you just can't make it simple enough.
greenman3610 1 year ago
@greenman3610 OK, you got me there. I misread the map. I'm honest enough to give you that. I jumped to conclusions without properly analyzing your point. You win this time greenman!!! If it's real or not I still think taxing people more is a scam of epic proportions. Peace...
Buckeyefarmer 1 year ago
@greenman3610 Hey greenie, you referred me to some trustworthy organizations like NASA for proof of real climate date ... ha, ha ... do yourself a favour and Google for: NASA admits climate data not reliable ... hope you enjoy the very first 10 hits.
oomblikkies 1 year ago
@oomblikkies
gee. climate denial blogs. what a surprise.
Hey, no man. the best source of climate data are the voices in Glenn Beck's head. I thought you knew that.
greenman3610 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@oomblikkies there is a massive difference between an opinion blog and respected scientific reasoning. If you don't understand that difference then you are too stupid to even know what you don't know.
uknowispeaksense 1 year ago
@Buckeyefarmer 95% of the CO2 emissions from cows actually come out of their mouths, not their arses. Much like most of the bullshit you are spouting.
uknowispeaksense 1 year ago
So, the corporate media outlets and controlled science reports out of institutions such as the United Nations are selling a CO2 tax. Of course the only way to combat GW is to tax the people. The oil companies are still going to sell you gas because you don't have any alternative. GW is just the left-wing issue of the two party special interest monopoly. The big oil companies are still going to sell you gas and they will get special interest exemptions.
Buckeyefarmer 1 year ago
Now let's look at why record low temperatures are cited as counter evidence. GW cultists see record high temperatures, hurricanes, forest fires, or just about any weather related incident and they claim it's the effects of GW. BUT, when we have record cold and snow, they say that it is irrelevant and doesn't prove anything. They also only cite studies that adhere to their viewpoint. Studies that show falling temperatures are ignored or attacked as are scientists who disagree.
Buckeyefarmer 1 year ago
@Buckeyefarmer the video showed that we didn't have record cold and snow on a planetary climate level.
zapatista512 1 year ago
@zapatista512 Yes this video showed that if you can't think for yourself and don't understand the subject.. I've researched the science. I know CO2 driven climate change is a fraud. It's all about taxation and control. The same govt. that has sold us wars, patriot act, obama care, illegal wiretapping, record deficits, banker bailouts, etc., and you want to give the same govt. money for cow farts and carbon footprints? Not sure who's worse, the Bush cults or the Obama cults.
Buckeyefarmer 1 year ago
@Buckeyefarmer
higher snow fall is expected with warming of the oceans putting more water vapour in the air.
mwhearn1 1 year ago