Added: 3 years ago
From: 10thdim
Views: 11,213
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (107)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • I want this video on my D611 phone.

  • Your video is a favorite on Laos

  • Video is dated for September 28, 2008, but it was uploaded September 25, 2008?????????????

  • Comment removed

  • Can't... handle... VIDEO!! *head explodes*

  • ygtbFkm

  • How likely is it that more than 4 dimensions exist? Can a universe exist and function without more than 4 dimensions?

  • @finalfantasy8911 Well, you just need two dimensions to make a a dynamic universe. 1 spatial and 1 "time(al)"

  • 4th dimension is a tesseract and that's a fact. Time is just a time, same as mass is just a mass and no, it's not any part of the dimension.

  • I've been watching the animation and some of your video blogs and heard you say that the 0d can be time but isn't the 4d time? I like to think of the 0d has being super small, a building block. A brick is 0d and a building is 3d, would I be wrong to think that many bricks are needed to build a building. If 0d is super big, where would our building be coming from?

  • That's all fine and dandy if you believe time exists. Frunny that a manmade mental formation gets such attention.

  • Fantastic videos Rob, I have enjoyed your many uploads hugely. 10/10 keep up the great work !

  • dude i had a mind fuck when u mentioned that there needs to be a universe for things that just cant happen now. Like the arthur just living to a extreme age. I doesnt seem possible now but it could still happen. I love your videos.

  • Im fascinated in watching your videos; you seem to have alot of information about the dimensional realities! Do you know of Alex Collier? He brought me into awareness of these 11 (now 12) dimensions of reality

  • ok the way i get this is up till the 5d is every way u can die and wen ur in the 6d its lik a wat if type of thing........ damn my head hurts

  • Well i think ya imagination runs off with ya..First science couldnt understand why universe ekspands..big surprice''thought own fysic's tell you theres gotta b vacum''.

    but then vacum cant just b nothing LOL. So whe got dark matter....Now try imagin nothingnes..Thats the real impossibility..And you DONT need 10 dimensions to exist.

    Its just a totally wrong way off setting things up..If you realy wanna go somewhere, you gotta unite fysic and psycics..There is nothing without exxperience..

  • so if we are in the 3rd dimension and there are 10 that we know of does that mean if we were in a 2d dimension there would be less possibliitys and if we were in lets say the 7th there would be more possiblitys? and why stop at 10 if thers 10 isint it possible for there to be 20 and so on?.i think we are looking at all this in a complicated way maybe there is 1 dimension but we have to split it in 10 to understand it? i dont know,,,,just the way i think

  • I used to think I was smart

  • Wow! thanks for the insight again! Good life and spirit and thought, be the eleventh dimension?

  • Beautifully illustrated. Thank you so much for helping me with (in a redneck voice) all that fancy book learnin'! I really appreciate this series. I had physics in college and mathematics through diff eq but I understand it way better now through your illustrations.

  • rather than thinking why we need it lets think is it possible

  • So in the 7th dimension, every one of the infinite amount of universes (on the line) has it's own 6 dimensions below, and then there are infinite versions of 0d, 1d, 2d, 3d, 4d, 5d and 6d ????

  • @BearWindAppleyard Since 0D is a point of indeterminate size, you can choose to think of it as being infinitely big or infinitesimally small, or any place between. The "point" in the seventh dimension can be thought of a position within the multiverse landscape - so moving to a different position within the seventh dimension and above is moving to a different universe with different physical laws. So yes, that new position defines new unique versions of the dimensions below, just as ours does.

  • @10thdim So in one of the universes 0d can be a plane and 4d can be a point???

  • @BearWindAppleyard 0d is a point. Can't make a line, a plane, or a cube (etc) if all you have is a point.

    But a point can be one of the positions within any of the spatial dimensions. A point can be at position x on a 1D line, or position x,y on a 2D plane, or position x,y,z within a 3D space... this is how a point could encompass a dimension (by thinking of it as being infinitely large), or could be infinitesimally small. Then it's easy to think about other points in a particular dimension.

  • @10thdim It's when we get to the 7th dimension I find it tricky. "Every universe will have it's own expressions of the first 6 dimensions" I think was your words. Let me know if I'm right: the 6 dimensions are basically the same in all the universes through 7d. 0d=a point, 1d=length, 2d=width, 3d=depth, 4d=time (as a line), 5d=all posible (time)lines 6d=all possible and "imposible" lines. But these dimensions look totally deffirent in the other universes?

  • @BearWindAppleyard Good question. A 2D plane will still be a 2D plane, a 3D space will still be a 3D space, and so on. But what occupies each of those dimensions could be similar to our universe but would more likely be very different. By the time you're in a universe with a different value for gravity, for instance, the way the underlying information becomes reality will be completely different from the universe you and I are in.

    Have you seen this? watch?v=49sVWNYyqWk

    Thanks for writing!

    Rob

  • @10thdim Thanks, I think I sort of get it now, he he

  • @10thdim How can a point, which has no size, but is just a position in 1, 2 or 3D, be thought of as either 1 Planck length in diameter or infinitely large without your conception of its "size" busting this "point" out of its definition as a sizeless position, since any size attributed can encompass infinite points? Isn't this like "how many angels can sit on the head of a pin?"

  • Wanna take a ride?

  • What do you think of how it's reflected on thsi topic if we take principle like Occam's razor on the multiverse theory, isn't it more economical in the way instead of having infinite random multiverses with no intelegent designer aka God, we have one universe with God? Or if there is a infinite number of branching or possibilities, that there is a universe in which God does exist? So in the end the whole multi-verse theory crumbles?crumbles

  • Nice vid man!

  • everyone reaches and perceives the last and final dimension whatever it may be. its called the dimesion of death. anyone who wants to see it must die to realize it. there`s no easy shortcut, just one way and a relieving way. i`m sure a lot of people will die to know about it!! lol.

  • Then if crazy scientists could tap into the 5th dimension at any point in existence and do crazy things they sure dont give a damn about this string of events because it's so fucking boring haha

  • There is only one dimension, and it's name is "infinity". The universe is an infinitely gigantic origami. It is not expanding, it is curling. There was no "Big Bang". Jeez, you guys make it too hard! What do you think God used to make the universe...tinker toys? Some day "they" will figure it out and I'll sit back and LMAO.

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • @MrsBambi1

    I also agree that the universe is expanding in a curved direction. I commented this on another one of his videos, "the big bang is anillusion" I believe was the video. I would like to see it proved someday.

  • @MrsBambi1

    You may read my other comment and see that it is very complicated. I've read into it more and find that I agree with you completely. The so called "expansion" proved by rays can very well be reflected off of the folds in ONE dimension. The universe being one infinitely gigantic origami is far more simple and makes much more sense.

  • @MrsBambi1 Only one dimension? I hope you're comfortable living inside a line.

  • LOL this video reminds me of that Ice Age in 4D by collegehumour.

  • Haha, that would be because Ice Age in 4D is a satire of this project!

    watch?v=_2yyuxOIO70

    watch?v=XjsgoXvnStY

    Thanks for writing,

    Rob

  • Makes perfect sense.

  • Well the spirit part didn't make sense. What if the 12th dimension (or 10th i forgot which one) is responsible for creating the illusion of free thought in us? What if lifeless chemicals posses this illusion?

  • so you need a 4th dimension to contain many 3D universes. you need a 5th dimension to hold many multiverses; a 6th to contain many multimultiverses... but once you get to 376 dimensions, then your done. Sorry, I'm not so good with the quantum mechanics & such.

  • You actually have the same thought I have on the subject matter.

    in my interpretation I believe we live in the 3rd dimension encompassed within a 4th dimension...so we predominately reside within the 3rd while being affected by the 4th...our role beyond the 3rd becomes a passive one...as where anything less of where we actually reside has an active role..and our 3rd dimension has a middle role...example We humans are able to control our external bodily functions yet our internal body isnt..

  • i totally agree with your theory, but i think ur talking mostly about timedimensions and not space. yes, both are intertwined but i believe there are more dimensions than 10. theyre not in the same tree as in your animation, but another place. you talk about wormholes in another video and i am very sure that thats a bend of the third dimension through the fourth (not time, space). its the same concept of bending the second dimension through the third. and i think its several expanding from there

  • Yeah, why DO we need more than 3 dimensions?

    1 - Infinitely small

    2- All subset possibility within the 1st and 3rd dimensions

    3-Infinitely big

    Couldn't those 3 be the base and then from that second dimension we work out the fractal subset possibilities of any other branching dimension we want to include therein?

  • You're not explaining WHY these extra dimensions are necessary at all. You're assuming that these various symmetries and alternate timelines/starting points/etc. already exist, and then conclude that these dimensions must exist because these things do, which is just tautological. You're saying higher-dimensional things exist, therefore higher dimensions exist, but not explaining why these things must exist. If you're arguing that wave collapse, etc. cause these things, then explain why they do.

  • Physicists like David Deutsch have promoted the idea for years that the multiverse of other universes exists without the need for extra dimensions. Brian Greene, well known physicist and author of The Elegant Universe, has only come out in the last few months to say that he believes the extra dimensions and 10 to the power of 500 possible universes predicted by string theory make sense when you accept that these other universes are just as real as our own:

    watch?v=IJ1fwxqqLQI

    Thanks!

    Rob

  • maybe a DUMB question but with all these dimensions all I want to know is anything beyond the fourth dimesion as real as the first three/four? I mean "all the possible timelines", only one of them will actually happen, right? Whatever happened, happened (Quoting lost here :p).

  • This is the most interesting and accessible explaination I've ever seen for the entire concept of the higher dimensions. You are to be commended sir.

    signed,

    A cosmological duffer

  • this is art!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • There is no such thing as what they say is the second demesion. a pencil on paper leave a line of 3D molicules on your paper therefore it has width.

  • That would be like me saying to you "imagine you're in a boat in the middle of the lake" and you saying "but I'm not in a boat in the middle of the lake so what you're saying makes no sense". A 2D line cannot be drawn with a pencil, because a 2D line has no depth. You simply have to use your imagination to visualize something that has length and width but no depth, because such a thing cannot exist as part of our 3D reality.

    Thanks for writing!

    Rob

  • I recently pointed out that the parallels of flat landers has been contorted into a physical paradigm.

  • Comment removed

  • 0th = a dimensionless, invisible point.

    1st = an invisible line (length, no width)

    2nd = an invisible plane (no thickness)

    3rd = visible 3d space (length, width, thickness)

  • Just a question.

    What if there are not an infinite amount of alternate universes? Does that mean we don't need more than 3dimensions.

  • soo are we ever going to be able to travel to different dimensions??

  • great video

  • i'm to young to understand this (N)

  • yeah it's hard to understand this if you're under 16

  • I have understood this since I was 11

  • you've been dumb that long?

  • @aliensnow Your age has little to do with it.

  • If I took a picture of you in your youth and presented to you 20 years later, would that screw up the concept of time? You never seen me until now didnt know i took the picture. The meeting happened by chance. I show you the picture, does that rejoin or repair our timeline? If I told you I was alien when i took the photo and showed you today, will I be that person's future?

    Once upton a time people destroyed nations because they swore up and down the world it flat.

  • I've honestly never heard that there were more than 5 dimensions...this was awesome, even to a layman.

  • How the past is ilusion 10thdim ? All we have is past and future but "now" is an ilusion just now when i write this and think what i will write that all is past but future will come one nano sec in front of my thinking

  • Physicist Anton Zelinger of Vienna has now conducted experiments that show that local realism is violated. Experiments like this show that the universe doesn't exist other than as a probabilistic cloud extending out both before and after our "now". So in that sense, the only thing that we can all definitely agree exists is the reality we are looking at right "now", and that "now" is not continuous but being observed one planck frame after another. Watch this please:

    watch?v=ehIbaoouPQk

    Rob

  • Thank you for that!

  • I go mad thinkin about this shit.

    i see patterns in everything from numbers to peoples behaviour(i think i miss spelled)

    but imagine this if im here in the 3rd dimension then why dosent myself in a higher dimension (which if infinite is trully infinite he must be somewhere outside my existence) come and see me? but then again thats impossible but at the same time it must also be possible too.

    trully though the human mind has no dimension :) we can never understand but always imagine :')

  • There may be a stop at 7 though if perhaps having universes with multiple initial states is not possible. Every new possibility that someone could think of or jump needed (like the ant on a donut/newspaper), can create a new one. Naturally, arriving at 10 is extremely elegant looking which means it might be fraught with ulterior motive but I think if that can be limited through sound argument, then bias can be disregarded. This is a cool concept to discuss and it needs to be discussed more.

  • Ha! You're ahead of me, I just suggested in another comments area that you might want to watch this one, lordalfredhenry.

    The reason I like this third "triad" is it gives us an easy way to imagine how no amount of chance, choice, and observation of the quantum wavefunction ever moves us "outside" or "beyond" the wave function of our own universe and into one of those other universes that have different basic physical laws - it's because they're at different "positions" within the 7th dimension.

  • Why would the universe current state branch out to other possibilities (5 dimensions)? Is there really something called choice? If we would go back to the big bang and then back to this time, would everything be different? I don't think so. Please prove me wrong. :) I don't believe in randomness.

  • All of the other parallel universe versions of our universe are decoherent/inaccessible to the one we're currently in: we can only perceive one universe at a time, which does make it seem like that's all there could be. I talk about these questions in entries like

    Randomness and the Missing 96%

    watch?v=OBDaZiMF8jg

    Unlikely Events and Timelessness

    watch?v=Hpf3y_EdHco

    The Past is an Illusion

    watch?v=MCCp2UZTvak

    Thanks for writing!

    Rob

  • HOLY. SHIT. sorry, i been watchin a load of ur vids over the last week n this once just finished me off.. im speechless.. or typeless.. whatever u wanna call it.. wow. wow.

  • Thanks! The text version of this blog entry has also been very popular. Always nice to hear which entries resonate with people, thanks for the enthusiastic feedback.

    Rob

  • I've seen the 10th dimension just take a half sheet of LSD and you will see it also. angel trumpets work also..

  • drink 1 full can of coffee works also

  • LOL coffee does not work like it does on normal people it puts me to sleep QUICK!

  • strange

  • i don't understand the 9th dimension.

  • and if that is true then is it possible that rencarnation or basicly our own 11th demension repeats this paradox threw our beliefs in the 4th demension thus making all faiths possible to be true aslong as we accept it into our own 11th demension? thus making us expeariance rencarnation or the afterlife as how we want it to be? so aslong as we accept something as true it will always be true in our after lifes?

  • Hi jettrono, thanks for your ideas. The problem I have with any theory that keeps stacking dimensions is it has to come to a place where it stops being "turtles all the way down" (google that phrase if you're not familiar with it). If you're going to add an 11th, or 12th, where do you stop? In the tenth dimension as I've portrayed it, nothing can actually happen "within" the tenth dimension by itself, because any attempt to observe any part of the 10th spills you into other dimensions below.

  • Some people say there are infinite dimensions, which might be the answer you're heading towards. By the time you reach infinite dimensions, you are again at the state I'm trying to describe, a "background state" from which all other possibilities are derived.

    Thanks for writing,

    Rob

  • am only 16 taking A levels is it ok not get get stuff?

    Am sort of getting 8th not 9 and i get 10th a bit. 7th and under i get clearly.

  • Absolutely.The Ancient Indians called it ATMA ,SOul,taking birth again and again..the cycle continuing forever..of course the scriptures offer a way out of this vicious cycle - one called Self-Realization - where u get back to the original home of your soul or ATMAN, the 10th (or 11th)dimension through constant meditation and liberation of the soul - some thing that is considered highest goal of human race...MOKSHA or SALVATION..state of oneness with whatever sits there in that enfolded symmetry

  • you totally have the Hindu religion DOWN pat.

  • ????? whatever that means ???

  • also i have a Visual theory on how with the 11th demension could be seen in a 4th dementional way that results in our exsistance threw a collision of all possible 12th demensions (to me being each persons individual selfs all on a personality plane that of which is unable to be folded) as a result, having people exsist without your ability to allow them to exsist within your own derived 4th demension, thus earth is a intersection point where this annomoly happened.

  • with this said we could be 11th dementional creatures that are living in the 4th demention but not having the same abilitys to alter time, matter, or physical laws? is this a possible outcome?

  • is it possible that all thought could be considered in the 10th demension because there is no set laws of physics, no defined matter, and no defined time. and like in the the video "thinking in the 10th demension" is it possible that we are our own creaters? in the way that our minds have somehow thought of ourselfs and resulted in some paradox in the possible 11th demension causeing it to become the 4th demension as a fold threw the 11th demension flowing into the 4th demension which we exsist?

  • One thing you have forgot to consider is that thought, or your capacity to imagine, is dependent on your past experiences and ideas as raw materials. You could easily imagine a bear juggling flaming chipmunks on a unicycle but if you have never heard of or seen a bear before your mind cannot complete that image. The 10th dimension as I understand it already emcompasses all forms and ideas past present and future, possible and impossible to our multiverse.

  • Someone gave your comment a +1, but I'll bet it was only for the imagery, not the content.

  • I don't think anyone can deny the inherent awesomeness in the image of a bear juggling flaming chimpmunks, but what is it about the content that you don't approve of?

    That comment was originally a reponse to jettrono's post (which also got a +1)

  • Right! There's evidence to support such notions as well.The most commonly used one is of aboriginals encountering large European ships for the first time, and being unable to "see" them on the water as anything other than large waves or some kind of distortion of the water. This story has been told and retold, some of the re-tellings more fanciful than others, but the basic concept agrees with your point: there are things within this way of visualizing that are beyond our ability to imagine.

    Rob

  • the date the guy said is sept. 27 but this was uploaded 2 days before this video was made!

  • But if you go to the blog link in the info window (up and to the right) you'll see the text version of this was posted September 27th. I just posted the video first so that when the text blog went live I would be able to embed the video into the text blog. Tricky, huh?

    Rob

  • @zentonil : It's an interesting arguement. But unlike the 'bears' and 'chipmunks' you talk about, the reality is only patterns of energi and matter. The universe doesn't need to immagine anything. Mathematically, any finite amount of information can be completely explored, during the eternaty.

  • @zentonil An internal anthropic way of looking at the same problem.........

  • Can you please explain more in graphics or illustrate it so we can understand better. thank you.

  • The figure that forms on the background would be an example of a being from another dimension? I heard about us being goemetrical figures in other dimensions.

  • Hmm, interesting thought, but no, the figures in the background here are really just interesting patterns dividing my image up into more and more pieces. Some of my vlogs using video feedback, like "We're Already Dead (But That's Okay)","Time in 3 Dimensions", or even "Randomness and the Missing 96 Percent" are probably more useful for imagining what a 3D person's 4D shape could be like, but "Hypercubes and Plato's Cave" is a more direct discussion of that question.

    Thanks for writing!

    Rob

  • This guy is my hero!!!

    Keep on expanding our minds!! Keep on breaking threw those parameters!!!

  • Thanks! I appreciate your support.

    Rob

  • this is cool and all, but lectures are getting old! add a little bit of visual flavour like you did in imagining the tenth dimension

  • What's the song at the beginning, during the intro? I hear it at the beginning of the Understanding the Tenth Dimension videos.

  • It's kind of a mashup created by Ryan Hill, using elements from my song "Everything Fits Together". There are multiple videos for that song here on YouTube.

    Thanks,

    Rob

  • I meant to write "imagining the tenth dimension" instead of 'understanding', sorry!

    Love the videos...I discovered them by accident.

    Traveling in a non linear fashion across the fourth dimension requires fifth dimension or higher! Thats cool, I remembering thinking about that one day. I thought I was the first to realize that! Well, coming from a guy with no schooling past high school, thats not too bad, eh?

  • there is more than 10th dimensions, You are wrong! Don't follow the books, you have to feel it.

  • If you look at a compass, how many directions are there? North, South, East, West. Does that mean we can only travel in 4 directions? I suppose that's what life is like for Pac-Man. But in our reality there are all the directions between North and East (and so on), really an infinite number of gradations.

    I think this way of visualizing the dimensions is the same. You can start with these basic building blocks, but then there an infinite number of ways we can travel through or analyze them.

    Rob

  • Cool

  • I love the whole time quartet series from L'Engle. Keep up the good work and keep us all thinking.

  • The common belief, now is, 12 dimensions or densities. Above 6th dimension no one needs any machines to move from place to place. We are about to move to 4th density, or at least some of us, and the planet will move also. In 4th density no one can keep any secrets because everyone knows what others are thinking. As far as what we will experience; it will seem just like what we have now. The 3rd density is the lowest for sentient beings. Our Earth is alive and longs to move to 4th density.

  • Dude, that was dense man.

  • WOW.... you're so cool.. Thank you so much

    you are making my mind race a light speed

  • cool beans!!

  • Comfusing... but whatever. Nice.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more