Added: 5 years ago
From: rohitpat2000
Views: 262,092
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (1,161)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • i hate malcolm x

  • Malcolm X was more inspirational to me

  • @lebronwadekobe1

    wtf, no you shut your fucking slave ass up. sheep

  • @watchMEshyne Nigga fuck you. Malcolm X til I die bitch. You a uncle tom sellout

  • @lebronwadekobe1

    how dare you call me a nigger you sick fuck. your the slave not me.

  • @lebronwadekobe1

    the only inspiration you have is from obtuse basketball playing morons like lebron, wade and kobe. thats why your a dumbass now. GTFOH

  • Comment removed

  • @afrikanballa Look I'm not one of those who think black people have no rights and should be treated as sub-humans. I just prefer a diplomatic approach because a lot of men who take the aggressive stance tend to hurt their cause. Malcolm X's belief in black people standing up for themselves are right.

  • The music is dark, gave me negative vibes, had to turn it off . Too many satanic vibrations. Moving on too the next speech.

  • This Is Dynamite!! WOW My Forefathers Constructed The Blueprint For Freedom And Desegregation Only Now It's Both Blacks And White Suffering At The Hands Of The Very Government That Claims To Be For The People!! If They're For The People Then Why Are So Many Of Us Broke And So Call Owe The Government And So Call Need The Government !!! My Fellow Americans They Need Us More Than We Need Them We Are Just A Statistic To Them Nothing More Than A Number!! Open Both Eyes Not Just One!! God Bless!!

  • @soccerguy - "Fuck! He's against gay marriage! I'll have to reconsider my vote in 2012."

    Your statement is technically but not completely accurate,... This vid discussion was prior to his first election in 2008. He indicated since then that he was re-thinking his position and this has led to his support of gay marriage in various positions including refusal to support DOMA. I guess you can feel free now to support him 100% with no further criticism or additional reflection

  • Martin Luther King was a good respectable man, Malcolm X was a complex man from my view.

  • @Karlmcguiness What are you black or white

    MLK WAS AN UNCLE TOM WHO WAS PAID BY HIS WHITE MASTERS to makes the blacks sit down and do not stand up for your rights and stay as a slave to white men and women

    while malcolm x said stand up and defend yourself until your dead

    i know you like mlk because white people are incharge and oppressing blacks and the blacks beleive they have no power at all .

    MALCOLM X SHOULD HAVE BEEN THE SECRETARY GENERAL OF THE UNITED NATIONS FOR GODS SAKE!

  • @afrikanballa HA! That comment of yours is epic fail! What are you 10? Cause youre thinking like a child. Unlike Malcolm, MLK and his followers believe in noneviolent tactics and that they can do it peacefully. Malcolm is greatly disagree with MLK and hes against nonviolent tactics. He believes that they must do it in his way as the only solution to the racial problem is to unite and form a separate country because USA will not have peace. They say he was like declaring a war, kinda like revenge

  • @hajispecialist You see people this is what happens when a sister and brother start fucking, the end result is they have a baby named Haji!!! JUST SAY NO TO INCEST!!!!!

  • @hajispecialist

    can't wait until you get what's coming your way...........

  • @WongOmowale

    the speech i was refering to was the field house negro speech , that i spoke of.

  • @WongOmowale

    Initially their method was to cruise the coast, conducting quick kidnapping raids when opportunities presented themselves. Soon, however, they found local actors willing to partner with them in these vicious but profitable affairs: some chiefs were willing to part with a few of the less desirable members of their tribes for a price; others went into the war business. they NEVER enslaved africans on their own land NEVER

  • THIS IS THE SPEECH. hes encouraging distrust and hatred for blacks who arnt field negros. ray charles could see that. he said he is a proud field negro, and he idenitfied the house negro as " close to his master" ie: educated

  • @WongOmowale

    you didnt refute anything. if anything you highlight the relation ship between the african kingdoms and the europeans. but the fact is africans were never slaves on there own land. they europeans " took" afican people and made them slaves in other parts of the world.

  • @WongOmowale

    malcom promoted hatred between feild and house negros. when he should have been uniting them. instead he encouraged distrust amongst blacks.

  • @WongOmowale

    your right A number of African kings and merchants took part in the trading of enslaved people from 1440 to about 1833. For each captive, the African rulers would receive a variety of goods from Europe. These included guns, ammunition and other factory made goods. which again proves that they were working together the whole time, and africans were never slaves.

  • @WongOmowale

    malcom promoted hatred for other blacks with this very speech. he wasnt exactly peacfull. he was a feild negor as you said after all. and those very people killed him in the end. house negros were laughing and crying.

  • @watchMEshyne Shut the fuck up . Malcolm X was the truth

  • @WongOmowale

    african european TRADE of " well-developed commercial economy in Africa"- started in 1492.

    the SLAVE trade started in 1502

  • @WongOmowale

    field negro = malcom x, " by any means necessary, NOI, murder, kill whitey, rebel, fight ....VIOLENCE

    house negro= martin luther," we shall not be moved " peacefull protest, dialogue, .........FREEDOM

    i think you like playing the victim. you came here defending field negros and saying house negros dont do anything for you. then you are boasting about feild negros winning rebellions, and ive stated that they were all epic fails. so as a last ditch attempt you try victimisation

  • @WongOmowale

    erm... the Portuguese arrived in the 15th century, and when the Portuguese objected to Fante rules and regulations the Fante expelled them. Thenceforth the Dutch arrived followed by the English, soon to be British. The Fante served as middlemen in the commerce between the interior and British and Dutch traders on the coast. With the assistance of the British the Fante waged war against the Ashanti-Dutch "alliance".

    define alliance.........????

  • @WongOmowale

    its haits fault that they adopted a violent field negro culture. so now theres rape, violence and chaos because of it.

  • @WongOmowale

    500 years..????? the war was in 1874. and The war ended with the Ashanti maintaining its de facto independence. Even though the Ashanti were annexed into the British Empire, they ruled themselves with little reference to the colonial power.

  • @WongOmowale

    there were two empires in ghana. FANTE-on the coast. and ASHANTI- in the interior. the slaves are from the interior. the fantes caught ashanti slaves and sold them. meanwhile there had been centuries of wars between fante and ashanti before the europeans arrived. when they did, they used these wars to get slaves( prisoners of war). and occasionally the brithish helped the tribes fight eachother by taking sides. thegolden stool war is an example of the brits helping the fantes

  • your right non of the haitians were house slaves, but look at haiti now. and look at the DR. the DR had alot of house slaves and they are succesfull. but haiti adopted feild slave culture like black americans. and just like black americans, haitians are killing eachother and have fucked up their entire country. just like AAs fuck up their neighbourhoods and turn them into ghettos. THIS IS WHAT FIELD NEGROS DO. house negros do not do this.

  • @WongOmowale

    what facts, you said they were slaves , i said they wernt they worked with whites . and your acting like it aint true. your own golden stool refrences states this. so keep dreaming.

  • @WongOmowale

    and they ashantis were still fighting with the fante empire which also CO_EXISTED with the british.

  • The War of the Golden Stool, also known as the Yaa Asantewaa War, the Third Ashanti Expedition, the Ashanti Uprising, or variations thereof, was the final war in a series of conflicts between the British Imperial government of the Gold Coast (later Ghana) and the Empire of Ashanti, a powerful, semi-autonomous African state that fractiously "CO-EXISTED" with the British and its vassal coastal tribes...... ie, they worked TOGETHER

  • @WongOmowale

    and again you seem to believe the most far fetched storys of black slave warriors * cough* and successful rebellions. hell youll even believe that the black men that shot and killed malcom " didnt mean it, and were workin for the FBI". but when somebody tells you to READ A BOOK, you say its old. and when an african says WE WERE WORKING WITH THE WHITES, you say they are lying.

    please grow a spine.

  • @WongOmowale

    And ghana fought TRIBAL wars , and the whites were " go betweeners" who worked to defend their slave buisnesses. why would ghana " fight" the whites when they were trading partners.??

  • @WongOmowale

    whites also touturd and killed africans in namibia, but they wernt working and being whipped. the whites wanted the land. and yes congo is the exception and not the rule for africans.

  • @WongOmowale

    im from GHANA, there was no such thing as feild negro in ghana. or any other african country. what part of " THEY WERNT SLAVES" dont you understand. thats why theyve kept there culture and language. please research the history of ghana before you speak.

  • @WongOmowale

    pan african movement WTF. you do know that africans were never slaves right. they were colonised, theres a huge diffrence. african tribes were in cooperation with whites the whole time. they didnt need to be " freed". and they wernt, . they got " INDEPENDENCE" which is alot diffrent from being "freed"

  • @WongOmowale

    ive already told you the feild negros never won shit, but one rebellion. and that was in haiti. AA feild negros only got freedom because of whites war and house negros.

  • @WongOmowale

    dubois and every other black historian understood the concept of the feild and house negro. and if im not mistaken it was referenced in the willi lynch letters also. so as for this made up definition B.S. get real.

  • @WongOmowale

    feild slaves only one freedom in ONE rebellion. google slave rebellions and out of 20 they only won 1 ( haiti)

    all the rest were unsuccessful. and while malcom was fighting his fellow field negros the NOI. it was a house negro ( MLK) that went to the white house, and fought successfully for civil rights

  • @WongOmowale

    stop actin fickle. the book is verified and Du Bois reiterates the illustrations about black feild slave crime. you choose who you want to believe. but i will tell you this. its funny how you will eat up any FBI conspiracy regarding malcoms death. yet inspit of the black on black murder rate, the black crime rate and the rates of blacks out of education. you

    a) dont believe field culture exists

    and

    b) dont believe field negros killed malcom.

  • @WongOmowale

    its not about malcom needing help and changing. its about the culture surrounding him and were it lead him, and how he changed himself, because of it. The feild culture that he was embracing lead him to a life of crime drugs and sex. he changed but the culture didnt. from the 30s 40s 50s 60s 70s 80s 90s this culture continued on its downward spiral. were today you have a sucessful black pres raised outside of that culture, but at the same time you have the THUGS who still embrace

  • @WongOmowale

    This to me sounds like black culture today. add to that the fact that these people call them selves nigger to degrade each other and general assumption can be made attributed to the field negros, and they way of life. historically whenever blacks talk about " niggas" on rap records, they have always been in a violent hateful vengfull context. ie; " ill murder that nigga". so it has never been a " term of endearment"like many would lead us to believe

  • ...the laws forbidding the acquisition of knowledge, and the fact that slavery and knowledge are incompatible. keep them, as nearly as possible, as ignorant and degraded as the quadrupeds of the fields"

  • @WongOmowale

    EVIDENCE....slavery in america" by dorethy schneider and carl J schneider

    : "The field negroes, as a class, are coarse, filthy, brutal, and lascivious; liars parasites hypocrites and thieves without self respect or religious aspirations, or the nobler traits which characterize humaity. morally they are on a level with whites around them. the slave holder steals their labour, rights and children. and they steal his chickens , hogs and vegetables...continued

  • @WongOmowale

    but i thought you said that "The truth is thug culture exists because many black youth in the ghetto have no other options because house negros don't help."??????

    so first its white people then its house negros....

    feild negro culture is what these people live by, as you said " house negros dont help". so its there own culture that is failing them. malcom educated himself, yet you still say " they need help" . help 4 what. why dont they get of there asses and stop killing

  • @WongOmowale

    the feild slaves were criminals. and weve already established that they were a MAJORITY. today we call black criminals who steal from other blacks THUGS !!!!. we dont call them uncle toms.

  • @WongOmowale

    ok, so we know why haiti failed, but why has black america failed????

  • @WongOmowale

    feild negros ARE THUGS. your not understanding, and your acting like black culture suddenly popped up when malcom x started his speeches. MALCOM HIMSELF WAS INVOLVED IN CRIME. at a time when blacks had not too long ago got their freedom. so a culture must have been thriving at that time. and this culture was feild negro culture.

  • @WongOmowale you keep saying " blacks who resist white supremicy" as if they had a choice in the matter. if they thought that this was possible they wouldnt have been enslaved for 250 odd years. and they were still only released because white people set them free. aand went to war for them. haiti is an example of a failed state, so if thats the example that you want to give for feild negro success, then its a bad one. they kill lie cheat and steal more then AAs, as i said. .....survivours.

  • @WongOmowale

    THEY ARE A BAD THING, because theyre culture was bad. They were uneducated, proud, and they were theives. they learnt to be survivors were as the house negros learnt to be men. as i said im connecting feild negro culture to thug culture because THEY WERE THE MAJORITY and theyre culture was what is now know as black culture. and an element of their culture has always been to lie cheat and steal. they had to be survivors, and this carried on till todaay.

  • @WongOmowale

    haiti and america are two diffrent things. so dont even start negating. but if you do want to go their all you have to do is compare them to the DR. in your mind the feild slaves are innocent timid victims yet at they same strong warriors. wtf, they were slaves. black american culture is feild negro culture because they were the MAJORITY. So theyre opinions and thoughts are what black culture is based of.

  • @WongOmowale

    house slaves were smarter because they were the only ones that were able to read. feild slaves were not allowed in the houses and so were not exposed to books and literature. and how can it be a matter of who struggles against white supermacy vs who accepts it when they ARE SLAVES. they had no choice, they had to work of they would get beaten. there was no room for bravado so ima need you to stop romanticising the situation. feild negros always wanna act like they bad in chains

  • @WongOmowale

    thug culture is feild negro culture. WAKE UP, the slaves on the feild had their own culture. when they were released after the civil war, and went north they brought there cultural ideals with them. various scholars have pointed of the crime rate in phillidelphia were you had southern blacks that came up north stealing from other already established blacks. please do your research

  • you seem to not want to believe that blacks killed him. which is silly considering the black on black muder rate.

    brotha wake up..damm

  • @WongOmowale

    how am i making feild slaves to be bigger than they are. THEY WERE THE MAJORITY. which part of that dont you get?

  • @WongOmowale

    feild negros dont associate themselves with house negros. fact. and weve already established that house negros are smarter and more educated. so when you see a million thugs at the million man march organised by farrakhan, in their gang colours. then its easy to connect the two. farrakhan has ALWAYS out himself out their as the leader of disparaged poverty stricken blacks. because they are the people that need to be lead. the house negros always walked alone because they could.

  • @WongOmowale

    I don't know why you try to act like you understand thug culture. .???? i dont know you, your just some guy online. and you dont know me, so what kind of a dumb assumption is that. if youve live around disparaged inner city blacks, then you would no that its all about competing. flossin and showing how much money you have. how many girls you can get. this is thug culture fundamentally, and its connection to feild negro slave culture is evident when you look at their aspirations.

  • @WongOmowale

    regardless of if they had " links" to the F.b.I, they were black nationalists following the teachings of farrakhan and elijah Mohamed. and they still killed malcom. farrakhan himself " the field negro leader" said that he " didnt agree with the killing...but he didnt disagree either". why would they say that publicly. ask yourself if this kind of thing is EVER associated with the term house negro???

  • @WongOmowale

    im not saying he was an ignorant thug, so you need to stop trying to put words into my mouth. W.E.B dubois believed in INTEGRATION. the same integration that 99% of black people push for their children to have. instead of staying in all black ghettos. Marcus Garvey believed in CONFRONTATION. witch was never gonna work because they didnt have the " means" being ex slaves and all. And would only have fucked up the progress of blacks.

  • @WongOmowale

    and regarding malcoms death. Less than a year after he left the Nation of Islam, he was assassinated by three members of the group while giving a speech in New York.

    malcom also spoke in the defense of feild negros, yet when he realised that their teachings were based of hypocracy, greed and sex, he distanced himself from them. in doing that he became to be seen as a house negro by the majority feild negro collective . and THEY killed him, because of it.

  • @WongOmowale

    feild negros have always been ignorant thugs. W.E.B dubois pointed this out in " the Philadelphia negro". all you have to do is go 2 any black neighbour hood 2 validate my findings. i dont know why your trying to act like thug culture is beneficial? no offence, but only an idiot would speak in their defence.

  • @WongOmowale

    the guys that killed him were working for elijah Mohamed. they were your regular feild negro sheeple, working for their master. proud feild negros like you are ridiculous. Thats why people ridicule them. with there saggin pants, drive by's and no education.

  • Bottem line is , field negros turned out to be worst than house negros. and it was the field negros who killed him in the end. he glorified feild negro culture, and today because of it thugs are more respected in the community than educated well spoken black men.

    

  • Title should say Malcolm X AND (not v.s.) Martin Luther King. 

  • @maria610421,Yea u r right,i do actually believe MLK got more people killed unknowingly meanwhile,Oboma is already bombing people ,so i say Obama is actually worst than MLK.

  • @deepbg1: Brother for every one of us who wake up one other person its a day of the awakening of the people who have been deceived in this long march to find freedom and peace on this planet. The greatest day is when Black men will put down their arms not to defend trators of our nations but to defend the people who have been victims of Jewish crimes across the nations of the world.

  • @deepbg1: I Believe you're right about Dr Kings Holiday, the reason I believe it because he was working for the Jews, the Jews wrote the speech that got him killed. They paid dissidents opposed to Dr King to Kill Malcolm X who was more truthfull & honest in the interest of Black people. The only thing Dr King did is get more poor people killed. The Jews did the same thing to Marcus Garvey, paid a Black woman to infiltrate his organisation, and landed him in prison. Obama is the same deciver.

  • Don`t fall into the trap of putting one over the other. They both were correct as there is more than one way to skin a cat. The shame is that they did not live long enough to work together. The same argument lies for Booker T Washington and W.E.B. Dubois. Many are "fooled" into picking one over the other, but this is foolish. The issues are complex and the answers can be found in many voices. RIP: King,X,Newton,Hampton,Evers,At­tux,Turner,Dubois,Washington,R­obeson,Garvey,Powell and those I forgot

  • MLK was in the boule, bought and paid for buy whites

  • @mykawest: It goes to show how deep the Rabit hole goes it took me years to find out he was brought and paid for a part of the problem not the solution. Hence the people are still suffering. 10 Million is due to die in poverty and disease, because of lack of knowledge. They even wrote the speech which got him killed & JFK speech as well, when will we learn. When will we recogonise the Robbers of they people. Their History is so obvious, and being blind we cant see them.

  • Comment removed

  • Malcom X was the only black leader with any sense back in the day. White, southern segregationists knew that white people and black people could not cohabitate in the same environment, go to the same schools and learn the same history without the entire fabric of American, Protestant civilization being torn apart. (Revisionist history so as not to offend negro children, the unconstituitonal Civil Rights Act, etc.). If more blacks had followed Malcom instead of MLK, we'd have a better America.

  • I dont believe there should be any such thing as MLK holiday,i rather they ve MALCOLM X day because had it not for MALCOLM X,Black people would still be slavery in this country,cuz as long as MLK was singing all his peacful crap,No white man cared,cuz the beat him and throw his ass in jail,It wasnt until MALCOM X came with his views and threats before white people started to think twice and had to choose between the 2 leaders.And ofcourse that was an easy 4 them to choose,MLK was their choice

  • @deepbg1: Believe you're right about Dr Kings Holiday, the reason I believe it because he was working for the Jews, and the Jews wrot the speech that got him killed. They paid dissidents opposed to Dr King to Kill Malcolm X who was more truthfull & honest in the interest of Black people. The oly thiog Dr King did is get more poor people killed. The Jews dod the same thing to Marcus Garvey, paid a Black woman to infiltrate his organisation, and landed him in prison. Obama is the same deciver.

  • All of these men, we must always remember as champions against injustice, and hope and shape the future, for more of their kind, who understand what it takes to shape the future of humanity. And pray more will champion the causes of justice and freedom and the good of humanity. Nothing less is worthwhile, till we understand the meaning of justice, freedom and true liberty.

  • There is JFK we must remember, and Dr King both lost their life for being against injustice, we must remember them, those who stood up agains injustice and dishonesty and peace. It's a foolish man who loses his life to gain the world. Too many Black people have lost their lives for tempory gain that does not change the destiny of his nation.

  • Malcolm X Marcus Garvey & Gandi, have been the trinity of the the race of people of colour, they have been the true beacon of light, to the History of the world. May these men be blessed for the works they have done, and the legacy they left behind, the impottance of the joirney of these men, I hope will never be forgotten, in the History of the world in the minds of men, past and present, from one generation to the other. AMEN.

  • @maria610421 Fuck gandhi, he was racist his damn self.

  • Malcolm X & Marcus Garvey & Gandi has been the greates light in the history of people of colour in recent times, these men have been a beacon of life to humanity.

  • @MrBanksyman I think comparing Obama to these two men is beyond the pale. Obama is in no way a quarter of the man these guys were...................

  • i dont understand you people saying you'd prefer one or the other, be grateful that they were here, dont compare and discuss who was better than who. you should appreciate what they did. some peoples comments are just really stupid like to say one man was better than the other, its not something that should be discussed.

  • @phatman811 the peaceful way is always the best way.

  • @phatman811 Couldn't agree more, I think the combination of both achieved what was necessary, I can see faults in both of their approaches but the end is what counts, in the final analysis they both achieved their goals.

  • I hate those of the Beast System who assassinated my messiah's: The Great Minister Malcom X and the Great Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. What an evil Beast who hates truth pointed at them.

  • @samella35: I have had to come to terms with the fact that Dr King was working with the Jews, and that is why they was tricked, and now find themselves in the condition Black people worldwide find themselves today. I have to be honest Dr King spoke great words, but they was not his words, but the words of the Deceivers and Robbers of thy people, The Theives of they nations. It took me a while to wake up, it proves none of us is perfect, and Lucifer the Jews will deceive us all.

  • @maria610421 Until u sacrifice ur life for the good of the people, u should keep ur mouth shut. He was a prophet, who i don't agree with wholly, but i will never disagree with his heart's desire to see African people treated equally. How dare u even speak negatively about Such a King!!!

  • @samella35: Its a wise person who know how to live the life they was given to live. Dr King spoke wonderfull words, but where is Black people today, are they free, or are they still filling up the Prisons. There is a difference between passion and real freedom. I think you have a lot to learn.

  • @maria610421 I admit i have a lot to learn. I spent the beginning of my adult life in church, studying the white man's doctrine. At 49 years old, i am just coming into the truth. But at this point i will not call Dr. King a traitor, or just a man with passionate words. If that were the case, maria610421, he would still be alive. He came against the war on brown people, was ready to hit Amerikkka in the purse. What have u done in comparison?

  • @samella35: Black people are worse off in America that they ever was, remember Katrina, you think words can end poverty, discrimination, poor housing, lack of education. If Marching could produced results, Black people would be the richest people on earth. We need to live our lives in better ways. What I have done in comparison is aimed to be self sufficient, white people is not going to give Black people anything "Present Reality" & past reality tell you that.

  • these were both great men set out to make a positive change lets leave that at that

  • @awayoutmovement Couldn't agree more.

  • Without Malcolm X,there will be no equlity in America today and hats fact.

  • Its very unfair that MLK gets more publicity in public schools then MALCOLM X. But thats part of our countrys hypocrysy

  • @87shadowfox youre so right on that one. in my (very public) schools they pretty much tossed malcolm x off as a radical, which he was, but his message was uplifting and true.

  • i love both martin and malcom

  • @Becky123190 Word ! Thanks for loving both men....same here.

  • A difference in path to take to get to the same destination. Necessary for mastering the terrain. MLK wanted to attack the conscious. Malcolm X wanted to attack the pride. To win a war you must fight on more then one front! Tactics my people often are God created!

  • tho, i like them both.... there's one problem MLK!! IT WAS NEVER MENT THAT THE SO CALLED AFRICAN AMERICAN [OR SO CALLED NEGRO OR NEGGER] integrate into this system.. The System is not for the so called African American.. and if we continue acting like it is; and keep placing "intergration" at the forefront of the conversation, we dessessatize the issue- we were never suppose to be here ANYWAY!- WE SHOULD WANT OUR LAND BACK [WHICH IS ISRAEL] THEY ENTERED OUR GATES JUST AS THE BIBLE PREDICTED!

  • @CashCash0411

    It is NOT israel. It is AF RA KA. Israel is the semitic/hebraic term. Remember, the hebrews were SEPARATISTS who felt that they were better than Afrikans. Those nomads adopted a condensed monotheic God-concept in order to strengthen their diversity (12 tribes into 1). We have ALWAYS overstood the aspects of the ONENESS but it has been demonized as polytheism. The Israelites suppressed the feminine principle (shekina) and promoted male supremacy as divinely sanctioned.

  • The true difference was that Malcolm X's activist methods involved a revolution against the opressor. MLK, however, was actually trying to bring peace with the opressor. I think Malcolm X's method was better though. Think logically, do you just go upto your enemies and ask them to call peace and then YOU must forget everything they did to YOU, your FAMILY, your CHILDREN, etc.. Or would you rather stand up, and avenge those who suffered pain before you and avenge your respect and yourself. IMO X!

  • @EmceeViolent And would you go back to your brothers in your homeland who sold you into slavery in the first place and rsie up against them? Would you like a comfortable truth that works with your own world view or do you prefer the truth that most Africans where sold into slavery by their own people for cheap trinkets....................

  • @edrusharry

    im not black dude lol, i just dont like racism and , i dont care who started it, what matters is who will end it and how. will it be wiping off all different races and leave only one, superior race? or we will finally stop conditioning the future babies with racism? one way or another, something has to happen, and at this point in time, nothing is going to happen, racism will go on as long as man will exist, and has been since man has existed. hence the reason for many wars

  • People can argue all they want,but Jesus is the One who died on the cross for all. If you want to know for sure, just ask him with an open heart and mind and He'll give you all his love, peace and Glory.

  • just look at south africatoday... great man my ass, all that blacks dol is turnsomething into crap, south africa is a shithole and the whites are still there, just wait until they leave, they are the farmers and the teachers, blacks are gonna proof again and again they are fucked up we dont even need to do anything, just look at malcolm the brothers blew him to pieces... real fucked up, if blacks had a spine they would move to africa instead of wanting whites to lower to their level

  • Malcolm X, Nelson Mandela and Martin Luther King greatest Human Rights Defenders in history in my opinion..

    R.I.P Malcolm X

    R.I.P Martin Luther King

  • @roeddanie

    what about womens rightsactivists? being female transcends race, and was opressed for even longer.

  • First of all there was no versus. Put it like this Malcolm once said if anybody harms Martin they would be killed. They each had their own ideas and although I am more for Malcolms ideas. You cant have one without the other. If there was just a Martin the whites wouldnt have listened but with an agressive Malcolm whites decided to listen

  • this is not a comparison.

  • 2 different ideologies MLK? embrace the enemy and continue being non violent against your oppressors. MX? complete separation from this violent beast that has no soul, no care for humanity, arm yourselves. MLK had passion for humanity but MX say U cant compromise with the devil! how U gonna ask the devil to show U heaven?

  • Here's the thing. Martin got assassinated. if all of this martin was weak crap true then why he is dead. Honestly to making a vs video is bs. They both wanted the same thing. Remember them as warriors for Freedom. They want to say Malcolm was bad and martin was good, The fact is they were both assassinated. Equality Justice Freedom was what they died for and it's what we're in desperate need of now. WATCH THE MLK VIETNAM SPEECH bro you might see him differently.

  • Here's the thing. Martin got assassinated. if all of this martin was weak crap true then why he is dead. Honestly to making a vs video is bs. They both wanted the same thing. Remember them as warriors for Freedom. They want to say Malcolm was bad and martin was good, The fact is they were both assassinated. Nonviolence Equality Justice Freedom was what they died for and it's what we're in desperate need of now. WATCH THE MLK VIETNAM SPEECH bro you might see him differently.

  • Malcolm was great; Martin was divine.

  • how can you doubt what these to great leaders

    what they achieved together has changed history

  • i only could have rolled with Malcolm. There is no way in hell I would support a man who wanted us to integrate with our 400 year open enemy. The civil rights movement was nothing more than a consumer rights movement.We were fighting to go get a bite to eat at these crakkkas establishments or go to use the toilet that these devils used.No wonder black people are soft as hell if u believe in this nonsense.Separation from these peckerwoods is the only option

  • Malcolm x was the worlds greatest politicus when the war was with the devils kkk!

  • both men equally inspirational to me .

  • Like the two witnesses marytred in the streets of spiritual sodom able to breath fire that consumes their enemies...

  • Malcom and Martin were Two Great Men in there own Right........Both visualized Need for the advancement of African American plight! Some individualities will always make the comparison, the comparison between the leaders. I refuse to do so! I've learned from both, and have capitolized from there accomplishments and teachings....Unlike many others from different backgrounds, who would like to compare. I'm standing transfixed saluteing!

  • @mmjaljs Very well said, thank you!

  • MLK couldn't make any aggresive moves he had to many docile negroes following him. Malcom had more revelutionary black's in his corner. Malcom rather die on his feet than keep living on his knee's. that was the differance between the two.

  • @revnasteewaters57 ......... what?

  • @dapadawan What's the problem.

  • @revnasteewaters57 they marched through the streets spoke out and faced violence even holding back violence of their own based on love and principle, that takes much more strength

    there was nothing docile about him nor did he take anything lying on his back he refused to return their hatred and he refused to shut up and stop fighting which is what they wanted

    mlk is a great example to mankind

  • @dapadawan Martin took the way of Ghandi but Ghandi was in his own country. We beg to be a part of our oppressors system. We face death to sit next to white people. We want equale rights in their kingdom. Isn't that what martin fought  and died for. Only docile and foolish negro would do it that way. They never will fight for something that we can call our own. We always have to share in someone els creation. Thats the black man for you.

  • @revnasteewaters57 thats every man who isnt psychopathic for you

    what he wanted was peace even malcom x wanted that he was just angry and in the end his former people shot him down and who else in his movement touched history, ali he ended up not talking to him

    its no doupt he was a great man but mlk inspired to create leaders in others and reach the heart of man

  • @dapadawan If Jesus couldn't reach the heart of men what makes you think MLK could? I don't have anything against MLK he did what he taught was right. Elijah touched history more than MLK or Malcom did you just don't hear about it in the whitemans media. I guess you don't know anything about the FBI being invovled in Malcom's death. I try not to put one black leader down over a another one. So I won't do that here.

  • @revnasteewaters57 its every mans responsibility and there were black and whites marching

    and both of them were assassinated and the cia assisted with the crack era and fbi black panthers demise

    all out of fear

    and no you cant put one down over the other because when its all said and done they both were strong leaders but in the end and with me being unbiased i can say all races have learned from mlk

    and didnt malcom x go and see for himself mixed races praying together

  • @dapadawan The main thing that America learned from MLK is that if she don't accept the way MLK was doing things Malcom X strategy was next. And she don't want that.

  • @revnasteewaters57 thats cool and all but our neighborhoods already feed off evil

    thats why every block named after them are the worst

    because positivity is considered weakness when its the opposite, because this world constantly tries to bully those and so you have to be strong

  • @revnasteewaters57 thats total bullshit, Jesus actually reached the heart of millions, just not everybody

  • @ThePacemaker45 Most people that claim Jesus are evil doers. You have those that are sincere about Christ but perpetrators out number them ten to one.

  • @revnasteewaters57 what a ridiculous comment. civil disobedience is FAR more powerful and courageous than violence. Oh yeah, it also WORKS- something violence doesn't do. That profound understanding was the primary difference between these two interesting men.

  • @tristramshandy3 Did civil obedience free Egypt?

  • @revnasteewaters57 why yes, yes it did. a group of NON-VIOLENT protesters overthrew a dictatorial regime.

    I think King had it right when he says "darkness cannot put out darkness; only light can do that."

    Also,

    "The aftermath of violence is bitterness.The aftermath of nonviolence is reconciliation"

    Even if violence is more effective short term, it is not an intelligent long term strategy.

    I wish X could have understood that (and I do sympathize with his views, I just think they're misguided)

  • @tristramshandy3 The Egyptians were on the brink of violence. The ruler knew this and made an exit. Now Libya is at the brink of violence but the ruler wont leave so blood will flow. I'm not saying there is something wrong with peaceful revolution if you have a peaceful government. Sometimes dragstic measures are needed. It all depends on the situation.

  • @revnasteewaters57 your first sentence makes a claim that I am interested to hear the evidence for. How do you know the Egyptians were on the brink of violence? Thanks.

  • @tristramshandy3 best thing ive read all day

  • @revnasteewaters57 Did martin luther king not die on his feet?? have you herd his last speech? watch his funeral and you will see. If a man ever died on his feet. Jesus.

  • @revnasteewaters57 WELL SAID!!

  • @revnasteewaters57

    Malcolm X wanted Black people to stoop to the level of the opressor and to fight them, this bring all of mankind to his knees. MLK wanted the black man to rise above violence, and to conquer through love. no man is dostile who allows another man to peel his skin off with water hose and has the discipline to not fight back, King knew that if blacks fought whites they would come out looking like "savage nigger monkeys" and thats counter intuitive to unity.

  • @TheScepticalobserver I guess the people of Libya should kiss Gadhafi's ass and don't fight back ?

  • @revnasteewaters57

    king in his speech said that we will impress them with our capacity to suffer. gandhi won a revolution without a bullet, if libyans openly halt there hostilities and express they are better than their dictator than the whole world would be forced to watch as he committed his evils, we dont feel empathy for war, but sufering the whole world can relate to, they would have the world rallying around them.

  • @TheScepticalobserver The revelution of MLK was beautiful But it really set us back in black unity. People like Ghandi and MLK are very rare. Most violent revelutions don't have leaders like these men but they get results. Egypt was on the brink of violence befor the ruler left. After black folks were beatin' down by white mobs we were on the brink of violence befor they gave in to king.

  • @revnasteewaters57 MLK had no revolution. Revolutions are violent and they overthrow governments. MLK’s movement was simply to integrate into the system, not overthrow it.

  • @infox1000 Revelution comes in all forms they don't have to be violent. There are spiritual revelutions as well as the revelution of the mind. MLK revelution was to change the minds of those in power. For all the bullshit MLK went through he sholud have overthrew the gorverment. It's like he died in vain.

  • @revnasteewaters57 Well even if MLKs revolution was to change the mind's of those in power, it still failed. Other than creating a few new laws that didn't fully fix the race problem, MLK didn't really have that much of an impact on the system. The same problems continue today. The only reason it seems like he died in vain is because no on in power learned from his example.

  • @revnasteewaters57 i agree with you alot but i do believe that violence is sometimes needed. in the future america you will see why violence and an up rising will be needed. the corruption that will ensue will be great call me crazy but everything is setting up for a great movement where any specific persons rights wont be the issue but human rights everyones rights as a whole will be in jeopardy and MLK's message of integration and working together will ring hard.

  • @FrOSTy349 Man white folks don't give a damn about intergration or your rights. This is the real world. MLK had a beautiful dream but it only lives in his head.

  • @revnasteewaters57 MLK wasn't trying to make people aggressive or start a revolution. Violence doesn't solve violence, revenge doesn't solve revenge, it only creates more of it. Humility, grace, & mercy was MLK's way while Malcolm's way was that of bitterness, destruction, & hatred. That's the difference between the two.

  • tho, i like them both.... there's one problem MLK!! IT WAS NEVER MENT THAT THE SO CALLED AFRICAN AMERICAN [OR SO CALLED NEGRO OR NEGGER] integrate into this system.. The System is not for the so called African American.. and if we continue acting like it is; and keep placing "intergration" at the forefront of the conversation, we dessessatize the issue- we were never suppose to be here ANYWAY!- WE SHOULD WANT OUR LAND BACK [WHICH IS ISRAEL] THEY ENTERED OUR GATES JUST AS THE BIBLE PREDICTED!

  • @revnasteewaters57 falling in the trap of who is more admirable. both men were willing to sacrafice far more then any negro 2day. they just had 2 different approaches both fueled by religion. martin was threaten bombed and assisignated for his efforts in freedom. what blacks did malcolm have in his corner? the nation turned their backs on him! if we had of honestly took up guns and walk thru the streets of harlem and mississippi da movement wouldve been short lived, Look at the BLACK PANTHERS

  • @deebeautiful84 It's good that we had a choice. I think the white folks were happy we had MLK for our leader. They new we wouldn't strike back under his leadership. Malcom X had plenty of followers. Most of MLK followers loved Malcom but they where to afraid to follow him openly. If it wasn't for Malcom and the Black Panthers MLK would have gotten nowhere with the white folks. It was either MLK or the other brothers. They chose MLK because he won't strike back.

  • @revnasteewaters57 Malcolm X actually expressed a willingness to work with MLK, unfortunately this was never to happen due to Malcolm X's assassination. I'd like to think that if Malcom had still been alive in 1968 and King wasn't assassinated then they would have joined together for MLK's poor people march on Washington.

  • @schnabby it would have been hard for Malcom to work with MLK after all the insults he aimed at Martin. Malcom became a lost soul.

  • We couldnt have a civil rights movement without both of these great men. Both played off our emotions in a sense. Malcome X fueled our fear, anger, and hate towards the white man. Thats how i feel when i listen to him. He opened my eyes and what i saw makes me angry. King plays off love, compassion and empathy. These emotions i dont have for those oppressors. Both we need to bring "lovers" and "haters" together They both played their roles as leaders very well and payed the price for it... Yin

  • Malcom had a hate drive to get things done, whereas Luther was kind and meek. One is Mohamad follower while the one follows the Lamb.

  • A MLK speech accompanied by a Malcolm X slide show, eh?

    Maybe a bit weird, but not really that weird because all people belong in a MLK speech.

    What would really be weird is a Malcolm speech accompanied by a MLK slide show.

    Malcolm was not a great men, but he was a helluva man.

    Martin Luther King Jr. was a great man.

    Malcolm X as subtext? Sure. Why not.

  • both of them