it is! a portion who take many vaccines in the early stages have made kids withunnatural and superiour mathematical and counting abilities. if u know what i mena
Proof of the utterly blatant lies that are passed as truths in the private corporate media run by the same psychos whom profit from the deterioration of our health. The pill from Limitless movie was actually a fluoride/mercury hybrid...coming to pharmacy near you. Lol so sad.
Mercury is good for you? Yeah and shooting yourself with an iron bullet is a good way to treat an iron deficency. Seriously you couldnt pay me enough money to look like a certified dumbass like that reporter..
Finally the truth comes out! Im so glad these studies have showed me that mercury is in fact safe for me and for my kids! thank you government for caring so much for my well being, and being there for me when I need you most.
your the best friend any idiot like me could ever wish for.
There so cynic that is not enough for them to say is not harmful, but that it improves your cognitive functions. We are talking about kids!!! If hell indeed exits this people should get the worst of it.
There so cynic that is not enough for them to say is not harmful, but that it improves your cognitive functions. We are talking about kids!!! If hell indeed exits this people should get the worst of it.
...and so, in the case of my father, it was a combination of things. Raw plant based diet, which I've explained the benefits of, proteolytic enzyme supplements, also a B-17 laetrile supplement, and a Graviola extract on and off. When first given a colonoscopy, Feb. '10, he had a malignant tumor about 4cm diameter, 3 inches from the colon exit. As of May '11, with a followup colonoscopy, the doctor (different doctor) could find no tumor... cont'd
...also, the immune system will combat cancer once enzymes have broken down the protein coating of cancer cells, and so supplementation with proteolytic enzymes is often good as well, plus that would probably ease the strain on the pancreas. Also, replacing animal protein with raw vegetable protein is good for the same reason, to allow the enzymes to work on the cancer instead of digestion. A raw vegan or vegetarian diet is very good for raising pH, better nutrition, detoxifying, and enzymes..
Foreign enzymes are broken down very quickly though, so were they injected into him or something? Otherwise digestive enzymes would break down the foreign enzymes quickly. Keeping a body well oxygenated is very good for some cancers as you have said, due to the fact a lot of tumour cells have converted to anaerobic energy sources, which is a lot of the reason why they are so detrimental to health
well if mercury is that great maybe we should take the executives of those pharma companies who push vaccines on kids and inject them with a few thermometers worth
This is opposit of news in Asian countries like South Korea, Thailand, & Philippines.
In those Asian countries, mainstream media constantly warn the public about the danger of mercury by mentioning the mercury level found in fish & shelfish.
Mainstream media of those Asian countries also tell people not to consume any dolphin or whale meat when they are touring Japan because the meats of dolphins & whales contain mercury.
That mainly has to do with the high seafood diet of those countries, as mercury is bioaccumulative. Also, its generally methyl mercury in seafood, not an ethyl mercury derivative like in vaccines which interact with the body differently
This is a little off topic but, We are taught that being a good American means supporting our troops! You kill for freedom? That is the ultimate OXYMORON! I support non killing and peace.
How stupid do you have to be to believe this stuff? There are scientific videos here on YouTube that clearly show brain cells shriveling up and dying when exposed to mercury. Search and you will find.
Scientific videos on youtube, how reliable. Get your information from scientific papers when science and health are concerned, never trust a laymen with those two topics
@Exorania I do, and the scientific evidence clearly demonstrates that mercury is one of the most toxic substances known to man. There's a reason why they send a HazMat team to your house, to quarantine and scrub it, if you break a mercury thermometer. But it's okay to inject it into our children, right? WRONG!
Sigh, the most important thing about any toxicity is the quantity and the compounds ability to stay in your system. Its not just that its mercury, it matters what compound of mercury it is, as that affects toxicity a lot.
They send a hazmat team because the quantity of elemental mercury is high (a few grams) in the thermometer whereas the amount in a vaccination is 10^-5 times less then that
@Exorania It's Thimerosal: "Cases have been reported of severe poisoning by accidental exposure or attempted suicide, with some fatalities. Animal experiments suggest that thiomersal rapidly dissociates to release ethylmercury after injection; that the disposition patterns of mercury are similar to those after exposure to equivalent doses of ethylmercury chloride; and that the central nervous system and the kidneys are targets, with lack of motor coordination being a common sign." No thanks.
Again, at what levels of exposure do these symptoms occur? I knew what kind of mercury compound it was, I was just saying that because ethylmercury does not bioaccumulate as methyl mercury does, and has a much lower half life, so understanding what compounds are being used is vital in understanding toxicity.
@Exorania Not to say that YouTube videos are any reliable source of information on the whole, but I don't trust science or medicine either... too much political agenda and research grants at stake to have 'faith' in the outcome of the research. Besides a proven track record of skewed data to suit the agenda -> Climategate & Heart disease via Cholesterol, just to point out a couple examples. Also, now mercury is GOOD for you, according to 'research'. Bought and paid for by...
Well next time you or your child has cancer, dont go to a doctor and see how well it does you. before things get practiced in medicine, the scientific community has to varify and get the same results multiple times. A scientist could skew results, but the end product of that would be other scientists finding out that you are either a bad scientist or do skew results, in which case everything you will work on after that will be distrusted to the nth degree.
"too much political agenda and research grants at stake to have 'faith' in the outcome of the research." Honestly,the general public,and conspiracy theorists like you,have so little idea how science actually works that it doesnt matter where the money will come from, you believe what youre told. The results can be skewed selectively by non scientists after the paper is written by nitpicking certain results, as so often happens with pseudo science. Reading the paper = getting facts
@Exorania I think I have a pretty good idea how science actually works... and to call me a 'conspiracy theorist' would suggest that you don't think large-scale conspiracies actually exist. I believe in the ideals of science and the scientific method, but all that has been thrown by the wayside in the pursuit of profit. Also, it matters very much where the money comes from for research. I'm not saying that ALL science today is in shambles, but all the research that goes on today... cont'd
I believe that there are agenders at play, but I dont think science is all that "controlled". You seem to think that scientists are easily bought, yet as a general rule I know of few rich scientists, as the money they generate is generally swallowed by the companys paying them to do their research.
@Exorania as far as you saying that science isn't that controlled... It's not so much I think scientists participate for sinister or greedy reasons, more like just to be employed. Really though, a scientist isn't a scientist at all if he can't practice science, else he's just another joe with a certificate on the wall. Someone has to fund his research. Don't you think it's reasonable then, that in order to get a return on the investment, someone expects certain results?
@Exorania ... that may stand to make some mega corporation billions, will be paraded around in whatever form it takes, in order to inforce the bottom line. In other words, I'm saying that a large majority of the peer reviewed scientific community, that ride the tide of corporate / governmental money and rest their reputation on Ivy League credentials, are whores. They sell out for position, career, and acclaim.
@Exorania Also, in as far as cancer goes... well, I know what causes cancer and how to prevent it. It is a lifestyle disease. My father had cancer, and I did much research on how to help him. He never had any orthodox medical treatments, and by using my research he is now cancer free. Why the cures for cancer are withheld from the general public isn't a question of science, it's one of finance. If left to it's own devices, science could do so much more for the people of the world.
"It is a lifestyle disease" Often yes, but transcription errors can occur during DNA replication which can also lead to cancer by knocking out tumour suppressor genes, and contact with carcenagens can also initiate this. Cancer cant be truely cured, its an intrinsic part of cell replication that some errors do occur (usually these are found and apoptosis occurs, but sometimes it doesnt).Cancer often goes into remission, so your claims of curing... What did you use to cure it btw?
@Exorania of course you are right about DNA errors, and 'cancer' cells being produced naturally. However, for a growth to persist and metastacize, and become malignant, certain conditions within the body have to be suitable for this growth. Generally in my research, three things come into play here. How toxic the body is, which often leads to blood and tissue pH, and how effectively cells process oxygen. Cancerous growths flourish in a more acidic, anaerobic environment... cont'd
@Exorania ... this is why I say that malignant cancer is expressed in the body, because of lifestyle. I know case studies are often not looked upon as credible scientific data, as the variable sets are often extreme, but I (and my father) are not the only ones to make this claim, and certainly to the rational mind, that must mean something significant. I've also read about the merits of Cesium Chloride as a treatment for tumors, but have no personal experience with that treatment.
@Exorania it seems to me that it may be reasonable to assume that the mechanism that normally leads to apoptosis, could be hindered by factors like cellular or environmental pH and / or the absence of oxygen. That would explain why sometimes it doesn't occur.
@Exorania I have a thought exercise real fast. Lets assume that we can all accept for a fact that what I have said about treating malignancy is proven true tomorrow, and it's reported on the news. What would happen? Big Pharma would lose their ass in cancer drugs and current cancer drugs research. Many medical workers would probably lose their jobs, scientists too. Food and agriculture would take an enormous hit... the list goes on and on. That cannot happen! We cannot adapt that quickly.
No, people are stupid. Heart disease is the number 1 killer in most countries, and most people know that lifestyle choices greatly influence a persons survivability against this, yet they still eat their fast foods and dont excercise, smoke and drink heavily.
Currently a large amount of cis platin derivatives with different ligands are in development and are being tested, along with promising Ti and Fe metallocenes. In essence a lot of research is still happening
@Exorania “There will be, in the next generation or so, a pharmacological method of making people love their servitude, and producing dictatorship without tears, so to speak, producing a kind of painless concentration camp for entire societies, so that people will in fact have their liberties taken away from them, but will rather enjoy it, because they will be distracted from any desire to rebel by propaganda or brainwashing, or brainwashing enhanced... cont'd
@Khepramancer "There will be a pharmacological method of making people love their servitude, and producing dictatorship without tears, so to speak, producing a kind of painless concentration camp for entire societies, so that people will in fact have their liberties taken away from them, but will rather enjoy it"
sounds as if they have already accomplished such deeds with ownership and direction of entertainment industries.
@Exorania Honestly, I feel pity for you. Unable to think outside the confines of the box that has been instilled in you and many others by the 'education system'. Being led by the nose by the dogmatic religion that science has become. Unable to think outside the box it has set up for you, unable to question without ridicule or think for yourself. Told what is real and what isn't. Science hasn't yet even acknowledged the great mysteries, let alone answer them. You miserable pile of chemicals.
Science makes you think out of the box, if you didnt, you wouldnt have theories to test. Which great mysteries is science meant to answer I ask you? Its a tool, some things are within its grasp, some things are not.
"You miserable pile of chemicals." Im actually quite happy as a pile of chemicals, and revel in the fact that I, and every other human are so complex. Higher education shows you just how amazing a system we are, and evolution and abiogenesis contribute to that wonder
@Exorania In any case, what do I care how rigid or minute your worldview is? Whether you choose to peek outside the box. Maybe not take everything science presents as 'fact' or 'truth'. Whether you would choose to ask questions, or heaven forbid, appeal to your sensibility rather than yield to some abstract mathematical construct. Whether to employ skepticism and critical thinking, rather than blind faith, assured that the information must be peer reviewed.
"Maybe not take everything science presents as 'fact' or 'truth'." I evaluate scientific papers to examine their methodology and see if it makes sense, if there are logical errors and to see if their conclusions are well founded. Science is a tool to understand the universe and ourselves better, and so far lifespans have almost doubled in a few hundred years due to its practice. Sorry about my minute worldview, but NOTHING else has that kind of a track record
@Exorania what area of science do you evaluate? As far as longer lifespans, I wouldn't necessarily be so quick to accredit science for that. I think lifespans were in fact severely shortened by the resultant 'Dark Ages' imposed by christianity rather than any other reason. Observing good sanitary practices wasn't exactly the hallmark of the dark ages. Well, we could go into some real horror stories there : P But really, I'm genuinely interested in what area of science you have a predilection
Im a chemistry major (half way through 2nd year), but Ive done some biochem (im by no means an expert at biochem though, it bores the hell out of me). But yes Ill watch that vid and have a look through the literature.
As for lifespans, one of the greatest additions to the general populances health was the smallpox vaccine, which eradicated the disease which was from memory the no 1 killer of people, infecting most children and killing a large percentage of them = science win
@Exorania ... by pharmacological methods. And this seems to be the final revolution.” Aldous Huxley (Brave New World)
I find that quote rather interesting, if nothing more than for it's anecdotal value here, given the nature of the video we are commenting on, and the implications it may suggest.
@Exorania also, if you're into this sort of thing, a good video to watch of a renowned researcher (G. Edward Griffin) and his findings on cancer... search YT for "The Science and Politics of Cancer (2005)". Couldn't hurt to gain a new perspective, possibly try to verify or disprove his research.
"renowned researcher (G. Edward Griffin)" He isnt a doctor though?
In any case, I just read a very confusing 2007 review which summarised all the past case studies that have been done, and it seems like more research should be done into laetrile, but that the toxicity of the substance is fairly high. Results from its use also seem all over the place.
"Laetrile for cancer: a systematic review of the clinical evidence" try an access it through springerlink. Im unsure if you can tho
@Exorania You ask what 'greater mysteries' I was referring to? Well, what if anything is beyond death for a start. I'm not religious, so I don't expect the typical heaven and hell rhetoric. I am however a spiritual person, I believe certain things, that I think science (quantum mechanics, et al.) is coming to realize. Also from whence consciousness is derived? Again, QM could provide some clues. The nature of energy as we perceive it. Lots of things that science seems more than happy to ignore.
Beyond death, my answer would be that there is nothing. Why would there be anything after death? Brain function stops, and youre thoughts reside in there in some form or another. Neuroscience is gradually unravelling consciousness and finding there is nothing truely magical about it, though it is incredibly complex and that in itself is amazing. I dont think science has ignored those things
@Exorania I'm aware of the concept of wave / particle duality, what I'm asking is where is the energy coming from to sustain the structure of the electron, and it's fields (electric / magnetic)? An electron is constantly emanating energy in the form of fields... where is it coming from? I've been looking to O3 electrodynamics, as it seems more progressive than the standard model, but still seems a difficult phenomena to explain.
Its simpler than that. The field is the natural state of the electron. The energy excerted by repulsion uses the energy from the collision, creating a potential energy, this energy is then converted into actual movement via repulsion as it is a lower energy state (re thermodynamics).
"energy in the form of fields" Its more of a static field (not really moving) rather than an emanating energy (which implies energy is being pushed from the electron).
@Exorania One thing about science that disappoints me is that if someone in a certain time in science cannot perceive a means or method to measure a thing, then usually brash assumptions are made that it doesn't exist, then going into the literature, it is usually assumed afterward that the correct conclusion was made by subsequent scientists, and the topic closed. Take space for instance, once considered an empty void by most, is now a seething cauldron of energy. Many mistakes stacked... con
Science determines, with all available evidence, the theory which best matches the evidence. Space was thought to be a void because certain parameters were unknown. In practical terms, space is in fact pretty damn empty. Supported scientific theorys are generally somewhat right, and they are adjusted when new evidence comes to light to create a better theory. Its how science and technology gradually gets better
@Exorania .. together, makes for incomplete or wholly faulty theories. I know this is physics and not medicine, but look at the definition of energy. How about the electrostatic dipole of the electron... where does it come from? How does it continuously produce this energy without any apparent input? Then there's gravity... the list goes on and on. Science is more than happy not to explain these phenomena, but simply to gauge their values and move on... cont'd
"How about the electrostatic dipole of the electron... where does it come from" Read a 12th (dunno what that is in the USA, senior school or something?) physics textbook. It doesnt continueously produce energy, that would defy physics itself. An electron isnt really a particle as strange as that may seem, as it exhibits wave like properties in equal measure.
Gravity is not being ignored, a huge amount of research is going on, the media just ignore it
@Exorania Then the ridiculous notion that everything must be particles within particles within particles within particles. Which I've read 'alternative' theories that could nicely explain such things in realistic terms, but science wouldn't touch them even if they could be proven absolute. Too many careers and too much money at stake. From my perspective, science is all about making rich men richer, and keeping scientists employed under the current status quo.
"I've read 'alternative' theories that could nicely explain such things in realistic terms" Id be curious to see how they explain the results of supercolliders. I want to explain what I know to you but its far too difficult here.I really recommend getting a higher education physics textbook. As it doesnt just give facts, they tell the reader how these things were worked out and why their theories are supported, and how these theories are employed today
@Exorania Aside from all we've discussed, as I've shared with you my position on things, and you to me - have you ever looked into the research of Royal Raymond Rife? He developed and practiced what could be termed as 'Energetic Medicine', also invented a system of optics that, to my knowledge, have still yet to be rediscovered. As G. Edward Griffin explains in the video (which I watched last night after some of our discussion) if you follow the money, it will uncover much in terms of an agenda
You, know why they do this. The know Republicans and Democrats are stupid, cause most Americans believe everything they tell them. Need to fucking wake up, America and accept the conspiracy theories as your truth.
Thanks for posting, dog. Well when you consider that the elite want to reduce world population by a minimum of 80% (just google "Georgia Guidestones") this makes perfect sense.
One more comment...maybe my Dad is right, beer is better for you! LOL He always says "I don't drink water, I drink beer, it has natural spring water in it" funny
Bullshiz it's good for you. Why did our parents yell at us when we broke a thermometer to play with mercury? Duh, it's poisonous. Yeah I get that chemo is a poison that kills cancer but that's the extreme. Toxins by consent-fine, given to innocent kids/adults NO! Putting crap in our water etc is horrific. Why not put friggin Oxycontin in the water, at least we'd be pain free. (sorry for my rant)
This demonstrates who is in charge of our media!!!! Mercury and flouride are neurotoxins!!!! Not brainpower enhancers. Amazing!!! We are so screwed!!!!
Im so dosile right now that mercury probably seems good for you, Hey folks, lets eat lots of mercury.
selenium is good for you to... google it, it gives you a life long heavy metal poisoning and gives you huge sores on your body ! inject it into you children, they get super smart.
@TAndrejko are you really that stupid??? We are all allergic to it!!!!! Mercury is one of the most poisonous metals known to man. What part of that do you not understand??
mercury is safe is that what she said. I dont know if im hearing her right. we r in trouble if they think poison is safe to use in our diets and in the medicine we take. the government worst then the serial killers they put in prison and put to death in there practice fema concentration acts.
i'm kinda scared and i thought that this would help but reading all these comments have made me worse!
my brother burst the themometer over the kettle and i went to get a cup of tea without anyone telling me! i'm scared i may have swallowed some glass or mercury! what should i do! pleaseee answer!! :(
wow...wonder why they think we are so dumb? maybe cause we dont pay attention or kick up a fuss about anyyyyyything...you only sell dumb stuff to dumb people so lets wake up and get our country back
Mercury is great for your body!! They should make brain nutrition tablets of pure mercury for the brain. Everyone knows mercury is brain food!! Take your mercury vaccines everyone, you dont want those evil moslem terrorists being smarter than you do you.
If you want, you can read the results of the study I just did that found that repeated blows to the forehead with a 2lb. hammer will improve cognitive thought processes.
I don't know about you but I plan to go out and drain every mercury based product I can find and test it on their kids.If I did do that I wonder if they would say that mercury is harmless or even good for you when their kids go into a coma??? I wonder if I would be tried for murder or let go because I was doing the right thing for the kids?
That is same reason why you can't sue your doctor if he misdiagnoses you and gives you the completely wrong medicine. They are only "practicing" physicians.
Yea, it seems like they literally are "practicing" on us... like we're guinea pigs! =( Well, I have to say than there are doctors who are just misled and really out to help people. It's the drug companies and the FDA that sickens me!
And the facts remain that even a very small amount of mercury is extremely harmful to a grown adult let alone a baby in every test conducted. Animal or human. Mercury is considered toxic waste and peer review journals are only summaries of unofficial but published as "official" opinions. The same type of "opinions" that all "practicing" medical doctors can easily claim to be findings by their own biased slant.
mjr256, if it so unharmful, then why has thimerosal never actually been case studied on humans, do you think it may be because the findings will allow alot of people to rape the big pharma companies of all there money in lawsuits, or is it because they no it's bad and it is in there deliberatley, i hate how some people just cant accept facts and common understanding,,, baaaaa baaaaaa
Case studies are done all the time and now 7 recent studies specifically exonerate thimerosal. Plus every vaccine undergoes hundreds of clinical trials prior to being given to the public. In fact, most medicines can't get to the public fast enough because the clinical testing phase to ensure safety often takes years. That's how pharmaceutical companies best prevent lawsuits, by not putting them in the position to sell a dangerous product in the first place.
Those links don't work anyway. But toxic waste is considered harmful in 200 parts per million and there is 100 parts per million mercury in a vaccine shot. So more then one vaccine at a time is considered harmful toxic waste.
And when you get in your car, do you blindly accept authority that it will work or do you think perhaps that you have good reason to believe it works? Do you trust the authority of the grocery store that they haven't poisoned the food you purchase or do you have good reason to suspect the food is more or less safe for consumption?
Welcome to society where since NO ONE is an expert in everything, we've figured out how to work together for the mutual benefit of the whole group.
Am I seriously to believe that if you had a serious medical condition that you wouldn't suddenly develop what you have the audacity to call "blind subordination" towards the attending physician? How easy for you to dismiss medicine you don't need to stay alive.
I suspect that like every1 else, you put a certain amount of trust into experts in every other arena every single day. I trust that your roof isn't going to cave in on you even though you didn't build it. Blind subordination?
Besides it's not fear mongering. Who's afraid of this? That's like saying "Don't let me hear about anything that might harm me! Because that would be scary!" No! I don't want to know! Oh God the world is not all happy and fun! No! Oh my God!
Your entire argument is predicated on a vast conspiracy involving the entire medical & pharmaceutical industries that you can't prove. You ignore the science, make no distinction btw. ethyl & methyl mercury or btw. safe levels & dangerous levels. All for the purpose of knocking down the scientific consensus that disagrees w/ you even though you have neither studied nor practiced medicine. Yet you have the audacity to tell people you know better & they shouldn't trust their doctors
Yeah I don't think doctors know everything just because they went to school. All medical school does is teach you how to do surgery and what medicines to prescribe. Not how or why they work. And in case you are interested in my sources look up:
No, you just think YOU know everything bc you have access to YouTube. It doesn't much matter to you whether you have good reasons for your beliefs or not so long as you can twist facts to support your presupposed conclusion
& for some1 who didn't actually attend med school you're hardly the best authority on what gets taught at med school. But thanks for making my point for me. That you consider YouTube a legitimate source for scholarly research suggests an overall poor academic education
But since you brought it up I do believe there is a conspiracy of course there is a conspiracy. Only a fool would think there is no real motive to create a conspiracy. As long as money or if not money ego's of doctors that don't want to admit they are wrong and look foolish, simply ignore facts to hide the truth.
After claiming I mis-characterized you for deducing exactly what your position was, now you're confirming I was right. Great job!
Now here is where you display your fundamental ignorance of the scientific process. It's actually in a scientists best interest to disprove past assumptions, not to confirm them. That's 1 of the main reasons it works so well.
Since it requires a long explanation, I recommend this 10 minute video that explains how the process of science works: watch?v=-h9XntsSEro
* Vaccination - The Hidden Truth (1998) * Robert Kennedy on the Vaccine Autism Coverup * Mercury, Autism and the Global Vaccine Agenda * Dr. Mark & David Geier discuss the CDCs VSD database & Autism * Vaccines: The Risks, The Benefits, The Choices * The Vaccine Experiment - In The Service of Good * Texas Governor Perry Took Merck Money Before Mandating Cervical Vaccine * Stop the Mercury, Start the Cure
All of politician RFK Jr.'s bogus claims have been thoroughly debunked ages ago. For the highlights you can check out:
skeptico blogs com/skeptico/2005/06/robert_f_kenned html
skeptico blogs com/skeptico/2005/06/lies_damn_lies_ html
It's one thing to just make a argument from authority but quite something else to dismiss over 99% of all the experts only to blindly accept the authority of a handful of fringe figures who can't even get the most basic facts right.
It seems as though you are running out of arguments. I do not disagree with you on any of your points except one: Mercury in shots is unharmful. It is harmful and it is unlikely that your point of of view is anymore valid than mine.
"Mercury in shots is unharmful. It is harmful and it is unlikely that your point of of view is anymore valid than mine. "
Declaring a falsehood is true doesn't make it so. Evidence-based science is always a better position than faith-based belief. One would do well not to take seriously any1 professing to be an expert on the effects of mercury who even know the difference between ethylmercury & methylmercury.
Hey buddy, so it's funny how Jonas Sulk can find the cure for polio and make a vaccine that totally crippled the pharmaceutical bankroll a half century ago. Can you tell me sir, how many cures have been discovered since? zero....have we gotten dumber, or have we not spent as much money on research and technology. And if think big pharma is so morally sound why don't you research how many of its products have been yanked off the shelf and how many lawsuits they've had against them. Wake up buddy
Sulk didn't even patent the vaccine & polio's been eradicated from all but 4 nations in the world. Small pox has been entirely eradicated from the world. Millions have been 100% cured of cancers & countless other life-threatening diseases. I never claimed "big pharma is so morally sound." That's YOUR STRAW MAN! & it's MY LOGIC that's fallacious?
None of this has anything to do mercury, which, BTW, is only in multi-dose flu vaccines, which no child even receives.
while you sound like an educated guy in your writing, your logic is that of a blind fish. To believe anything that mainstream media or our sociofascist goverment makes up is a crime in itself and is furthermore reasoning to discredit your intellect . Your fighting on the side that is controlled by a very few very powerful men. These are the same people who allow a non government body control our money (fed reserve), the same people who give us the FDA only to feed us the worlds worst food. con
I go where the evidence is. It's you who blindly trust your own biases. Where's your evidence? Something can only be declared as true in so far as it can be demonstrated to be true with evidence. Shouting "my gov't ate my evidence" is not evidence; it's an excuse to keep believing in something despite the evidence. And while it could hypothetically still be true, it's not remotely persuasive to any rational person. Further, you reveal a complete ignorance of the scientific process.
These are the same people who don't want progress. These men own their industry. Big oil, big pharma, big banking want complete control and use the media outlets to help brainwash american people. There has been medical breakthroughs that get brushed under the carpet by pharma. New fuel sources and energies that have been discovered but never allowed to flourish, why can't everyone see what I see. Use some common sense and know that money breeds power and power breeds corruption.
Going back to my older comments, you seem to have no trouble putting a reasonable amount of trust in presumably every other arena. You trust your home was built securely, that your car will work in the morning, that it won't explode & its safety features will work. You trust your spouse. You put reasonable amounts of trust in all kinds of people every day. This is not naive blind trust & it may even disappear if given good reason to doubt. But the burden of proof is on those claiming conspiracy
@davidfoshee If youre worried about that mercury content you or your child is having, worry about the content in big fish like tuna, not vaccines. There is more mercury in a serving of tuna (about 50ug) than the amount used as a preservative in vaccines (about 25ug per dose).
"medical breakthroughs... brushed under the carpet." Yes there are some things that are (molecules that already exist and cant be patented) however promising breakthroughs besides that are generally researched
So is it hazardous because prolonged exposure to those concentrations is bad, or is it hazardous because mercury at that level is not easily removed from ecosystems and so builds up, (aka an accumulative toxin) or what? Also, the type of mercury compund is important
I was drawing the comparison between the amount of mercury in food compared to the amount of mercury in a shot I wasnt sidestepping the issue.
"I doubt ... mandatory to eat tuna" Is the flu shot mandatory in the USA?
@Exorania Also, although I do not yet think that they have made vaccinations mandatory, they seem to be trying very hard to make it so. Do a google search for 'mandatory vaccinations' for articles about this.
I never said there was any conspiracy to begin with. That point is something you projected onto me and has nothing to do with the facts. Also I don't know why my patent claim ignores 17 studies when the tobacco industry is prime example of a wealthy corporation that can invent as many studies as it wants to with paid off doctors. And if you follow the money trail all of those findings were conducted by people that make money off of thimerosal.
A conspiracy is implicit. Either 99% of the entire medical community would then be incompetent or lying
You ignore 17 properly conducted clinical studies. Again, here's where the conspiracy issue comes up. Tobacco companies are notorious for inventing bogus studies but what does that have to do w/ this issue? Nothing. I'm talking about 17 carefully conducted studies under controlled clinical conditions. There are also people that make money off of car crashes; that doesn't mean they cause 'em.
Just in case people want to look it up it's called thimerosal and it was made illegal in Denmark. The reason why they want it in shots is because whoever owns the patent on thimerosal gets billions of dollars from it and I'm pretty sure it's Eli Lily.
it is! a portion who take many vaccines in the early stages have made kids withunnatural and superiour mathematical and counting abilities. if u know what i mena
thesolimanz 4 days ago
Proof of the utterly blatant lies that are passed as truths in the private corporate media run by the same psychos whom profit from the deterioration of our health. The pill from Limitless movie was actually a fluoride/mercury hybrid...coming to pharmacy near you. Lol so sad.
TheBigShotJonesy 3 weeks ago
This person is a fuck tard, maybe you should inject it into your vains bitch and see how good it is for you, you would be dead in hours cunt
ZorcovsParadise12 4 weeks ago
Mercury is good for you? Yeah and shooting yourself with an iron bullet is a good way to treat an iron deficency. Seriously you couldnt pay me enough money to look like a certified dumbass like that reporter..
xinecallaw 1 month ago 2
May this teleprompter talking head ignorant female....
rot in hell.
frickadele 1 month ago
Finally the truth comes out! Im so glad these studies have showed me that mercury is in fact safe for me and for my kids! thank you government for caring so much for my well being, and being there for me when I need you most.
your the best friend any idiot like me could ever wish for.
TheSoundcradle 1 month ago
Wow. Who was in charge of these studies? I want names..... anyone?
indicasativafusion 4 months ago
Excellent ;]
Quex01 5 months ago
Breaking news! Radiation is good for you too! Let's all put our kids in the microwave!
SoloWing808 5 months ago
There so cynic that is not enough for them to say is not harmful, but that it improves your cognitive functions. We are talking about kids!!! If hell indeed exits this people should get the worst of it.
gino07770 5 months ago
There so cynic that is not enough for them to say is not harmful, but that it improves your cognitive functions. We are talking about kids!!! If hell indeed exits this people should get the worst of it.
gino07770 5 months ago
Boycott the Criminal Corporate Media!
UnitedBoycott 5 months ago
Journal of Pediatrics, just lost their credibility.
Lisztman88 5 months ago
I touched mercury... and i had to watch my hands ASAP (i was 7) now it looks like i can touch it? that so stupid -.-
7alexylucky7 6 months ago
mmm... mercury... *drool*
havanissa 6 months ago
This bitch should be forced to have a mercury injected into her on the show - so as to make her statement more convincing.. What a bull...
fafluk 7 months ago 7
...and so, in the case of my father, it was a combination of things. Raw plant based diet, which I've explained the benefits of, proteolytic enzyme supplements, also a B-17 laetrile supplement, and a Graviola extract on and off. When first given a colonoscopy, Feb. '10, he had a malignant tumor about 4cm diameter, 3 inches from the colon exit. As of May '11, with a followup colonoscopy, the doctor (different doctor) could find no tumor... cont'd
Khepramancer 7 months ago
...also, the immune system will combat cancer once enzymes have broken down the protein coating of cancer cells, and so supplementation with proteolytic enzymes is often good as well, plus that would probably ease the strain on the pancreas. Also, replacing animal protein with raw vegetable protein is good for the same reason, to allow the enzymes to work on the cancer instead of digestion. A raw vegan or vegetarian diet is very good for raising pH, better nutrition, detoxifying, and enzymes..
Khepramancer 7 months ago
@Khepramancer
Foreign enzymes are broken down very quickly though, so were they injected into him or something? Otherwise digestive enzymes would break down the foreign enzymes quickly. Keeping a body well oxygenated is very good for some cancers as you have said, due to the fact a lot of tumour cells have converted to anaerobic energy sources, which is a lot of the reason why they are so detrimental to health
Exorania 7 months ago
well if mercury is that great maybe we should take the executives of those pharma companies who push vaccines on kids and inject them with a few thermometers worth
g1981c 7 months ago
~"I have sworn upon the altar of God, eternal hostility against every form of tyranny over the mind of man." -- Thomas Jefferson in a letter to Dr.
Benjamin Rush, September 23, 1800. Inscribed in the Jefferson Memorial.
~"The right to revolt has sources deep in our history." -- Supreme Court
Justice William O. Douglas
~Every calling is great when greatly pursued.--Oliver Wendell Holmes
rclark23 7 months ago
This is opposit of news in Asian countries like South Korea, Thailand, & Philippines.
In those Asian countries, mainstream media constantly warn the public about the danger of mercury by mentioning the mercury level found in fish & shelfish.
Mainstream media of those Asian countries also tell people not to consume any dolphin or whale meat when they are touring Japan because the meats of dolphins & whales contain mercury.
KimInLosAngeles 7 months ago
@KimInLosAngeles
That mainly has to do with the high seafood diet of those countries, as mercury is bioaccumulative. Also, its generally methyl mercury in seafood, not an ethyl mercury derivative like in vaccines which interact with the body differently
Exorania 7 months ago
Hold on here... Weren't they saying that it was a "Conspiracy Theory" that there was Mercury in vaccines in the first place? Just sayin...
FunkDonkey1 8 months ago
progress in change for chilldren lifes good deal as log as thar black or arab or the rest of the world, aslong as ther not whit sorry bad english !!
abdulduule 8 months ago
progress in change for chilldren lifes good deal as log as thar black or arab or aslong as ther not whit sorry bad english !!
abdulduule 8 months ago
what are you fucking on chrack (cemicel)
abdulduule 8 months ago
doctors should stay out of politics and stick to giving pills and shots.
rickster348 9 months ago
doesnt suprise me coming from american television
mvprodigy 9 months ago
IF IT'S GOOD FOR YOU FAT ASS EAT IT.FUCKING SCUMBAGS...ALL THE FUCK YOU DO IS SERVE THE FUUUCKING MONEY AND NOTHING ELSE
Bamagiotis 11 months ago
This is a little off topic but, We are taught that being a good American means supporting our troops! You kill for freedom? That is the ultimate OXYMORON! I support non killing and peace.
OnELovEBEliEvE 11 months ago
tears...
mdeasy 11 months ago
How stupid do you have to be to believe this stuff? There are scientific videos here on YouTube that clearly show brain cells shriveling up and dying when exposed to mercury. Search and you will find.
DougKendall 11 months ago
@DougKendall
Scientific videos on youtube, how reliable. Get your information from scientific papers when science and health are concerned, never trust a laymen with those two topics
Exorania 7 months ago
@Exorania I do, and the scientific evidence clearly demonstrates that mercury is one of the most toxic substances known to man. There's a reason why they send a HazMat team to your house, to quarantine and scrub it, if you break a mercury thermometer. But it's okay to inject it into our children, right? WRONG!
DougKendall 7 months ago
@DougKendall
Sigh, the most important thing about any toxicity is the quantity and the compounds ability to stay in your system. Its not just that its mercury, it matters what compound of mercury it is, as that affects toxicity a lot.
They send a hazmat team because the quantity of elemental mercury is high (a few grams) in the thermometer whereas the amount in a vaccination is 10^-5 times less then that
Exorania 7 months ago
@Exorania It's Thimerosal: "Cases have been reported of severe poisoning by accidental exposure or attempted suicide, with some fatalities. Animal experiments suggest that thiomersal rapidly dissociates to release ethylmercury after injection; that the disposition patterns of mercury are similar to those after exposure to equivalent doses of ethylmercury chloride; and that the central nervous system and the kidneys are targets, with lack of motor coordination being a common sign." No thanks.
DougKendall 7 months ago
@DougKendall
Again, at what levels of exposure do these symptoms occur? I knew what kind of mercury compound it was, I was just saying that because ethylmercury does not bioaccumulate as methyl mercury does, and has a much lower half life, so understanding what compounds are being used is vital in understanding toxicity.
Exorania 7 months ago
@Exorania Not to say that YouTube videos are any reliable source of information on the whole, but I don't trust science or medicine either... too much political agenda and research grants at stake to have 'faith' in the outcome of the research. Besides a proven track record of skewed data to suit the agenda -> Climategate & Heart disease via Cholesterol, just to point out a couple examples. Also, now mercury is GOOD for you, according to 'research'. Bought and paid for by...
Khepramancer 7 months ago
@Khepramancer
Well next time you or your child has cancer, dont go to a doctor and see how well it does you. before things get practiced in medicine, the scientific community has to varify and get the same results multiple times. A scientist could skew results, but the end product of that would be other scientists finding out that you are either a bad scientist or do skew results, in which case everything you will work on after that will be distrusted to the nth degree.
Exorania 7 months ago
@Khepramancer
"too much political agenda and research grants at stake to have 'faith' in the outcome of the research." Honestly,the general public,and conspiracy theorists like you,have so little idea how science actually works that it doesnt matter where the money will come from, you believe what youre told. The results can be skewed selectively by non scientists after the paper is written by nitpicking certain results, as so often happens with pseudo science. Reading the paper = getting facts
Exorania 7 months ago
@Exorania I think I have a pretty good idea how science actually works... and to call me a 'conspiracy theorist' would suggest that you don't think large-scale conspiracies actually exist. I believe in the ideals of science and the scientific method, but all that has been thrown by the wayside in the pursuit of profit. Also, it matters very much where the money comes from for research. I'm not saying that ALL science today is in shambles, but all the research that goes on today... cont'd
Khepramancer 7 months ago
@Khepramancer
I believe that there are agenders at play, but I dont think science is all that "controlled". You seem to think that scientists are easily bought, yet as a general rule I know of few rich scientists, as the money they generate is generally swallowed by the companys paying them to do their research.
Exorania 7 months ago
@Exorania as far as you saying that science isn't that controlled... It's not so much I think scientists participate for sinister or greedy reasons, more like just to be employed. Really though, a scientist isn't a scientist at all if he can't practice science, else he's just another joe with a certificate on the wall. Someone has to fund his research. Don't you think it's reasonable then, that in order to get a return on the investment, someone expects certain results?
Khepramancer 7 months ago
@Exorania ... that may stand to make some mega corporation billions, will be paraded around in whatever form it takes, in order to inforce the bottom line. In other words, I'm saying that a large majority of the peer reviewed scientific community, that ride the tide of corporate / governmental money and rest their reputation on Ivy League credentials, are whores. They sell out for position, career, and acclaim.
Khepramancer 7 months ago
@Exorania Also, in as far as cancer goes... well, I know what causes cancer and how to prevent it. It is a lifestyle disease. My father had cancer, and I did much research on how to help him. He never had any orthodox medical treatments, and by using my research he is now cancer free. Why the cures for cancer are withheld from the general public isn't a question of science, it's one of finance. If left to it's own devices, science could do so much more for the people of the world.
Khepramancer 7 months ago
@Khepramancer
"It is a lifestyle disease" Often yes, but transcription errors can occur during DNA replication which can also lead to cancer by knocking out tumour suppressor genes, and contact with carcenagens can also initiate this. Cancer cant be truely cured, its an intrinsic part of cell replication that some errors do occur (usually these are found and apoptosis occurs, but sometimes it doesnt).Cancer often goes into remission, so your claims of curing... What did you use to cure it btw?
Exorania 7 months ago
@Exorania of course you are right about DNA errors, and 'cancer' cells being produced naturally. However, for a growth to persist and metastacize, and become malignant, certain conditions within the body have to be suitable for this growth. Generally in my research, three things come into play here. How toxic the body is, which often leads to blood and tissue pH, and how effectively cells process oxygen. Cancerous growths flourish in a more acidic, anaerobic environment... cont'd
Khepramancer 7 months ago
@Exorania ... this is why I say that malignant cancer is expressed in the body, because of lifestyle. I know case studies are often not looked upon as credible scientific data, as the variable sets are often extreme, but I (and my father) are not the only ones to make this claim, and certainly to the rational mind, that must mean something significant. I've also read about the merits of Cesium Chloride as a treatment for tumors, but have no personal experience with that treatment.
Khepramancer 7 months ago
@Exorania it seems to me that it may be reasonable to assume that the mechanism that normally leads to apoptosis, could be hindered by factors like cellular or environmental pH and / or the absence of oxygen. That would explain why sometimes it doesn't occur.
Khepramancer 7 months ago
@Exorania I have a thought exercise real fast. Lets assume that we can all accept for a fact that what I have said about treating malignancy is proven true tomorrow, and it's reported on the news. What would happen? Big Pharma would lose their ass in cancer drugs and current cancer drugs research. Many medical workers would probably lose their jobs, scientists too. Food and agriculture would take an enormous hit... the list goes on and on. That cannot happen! We cannot adapt that quickly.
Khepramancer 7 months ago
@Khepramancer
No, people are stupid. Heart disease is the number 1 killer in most countries, and most people know that lifestyle choices greatly influence a persons survivability against this, yet they still eat their fast foods and dont excercise, smoke and drink heavily.
Currently a large amount of cis platin derivatives with different ligands are in development and are being tested, along with promising Ti and Fe metallocenes. In essence a lot of research is still happening
Exorania 7 months ago
@Exorania “There will be, in the next generation or so, a pharmacological method of making people love their servitude, and producing dictatorship without tears, so to speak, producing a kind of painless concentration camp for entire societies, so that people will in fact have their liberties taken away from them, but will rather enjoy it, because they will be distracted from any desire to rebel by propaganda or brainwashing, or brainwashing enhanced... cont'd
Khepramancer 7 months ago
@Khepramancer "There will be a pharmacological method of making people love their servitude, and producing dictatorship without tears, so to speak, producing a kind of painless concentration camp for entire societies, so that people will in fact have their liberties taken away from them, but will rather enjoy it"
sounds as if they have already accomplished such deeds with ownership and direction of entertainment industries.
indicasativafusion 5 months ago
Comment removed
Khepramancer 7 months ago
@Exorania Honestly, I feel pity for you. Unable to think outside the confines of the box that has been instilled in you and many others by the 'education system'. Being led by the nose by the dogmatic religion that science has become. Unable to think outside the box it has set up for you, unable to question without ridicule or think for yourself. Told what is real and what isn't. Science hasn't yet even acknowledged the great mysteries, let alone answer them. You miserable pile of chemicals.
Khepramancer 7 months ago
@Khepramancer
Science makes you think out of the box, if you didnt, you wouldnt have theories to test. Which great mysteries is science meant to answer I ask you? Its a tool, some things are within its grasp, some things are not.
"You miserable pile of chemicals." Im actually quite happy as a pile of chemicals, and revel in the fact that I, and every other human are so complex. Higher education shows you just how amazing a system we are, and evolution and abiogenesis contribute to that wonder
Exorania 7 months ago
@Exorania In any case, what do I care how rigid or minute your worldview is? Whether you choose to peek outside the box. Maybe not take everything science presents as 'fact' or 'truth'. Whether you would choose to ask questions, or heaven forbid, appeal to your sensibility rather than yield to some abstract mathematical construct. Whether to employ skepticism and critical thinking, rather than blind faith, assured that the information must be peer reviewed.
Khepramancer 7 months ago
@Khepramancer
"Maybe not take everything science presents as 'fact' or 'truth'." I evaluate scientific papers to examine their methodology and see if it makes sense, if there are logical errors and to see if their conclusions are well founded. Science is a tool to understand the universe and ourselves better, and so far lifespans have almost doubled in a few hundred years due to its practice. Sorry about my minute worldview, but NOTHING else has that kind of a track record
Exorania 7 months ago
@Exorania what area of science do you evaluate? As far as longer lifespans, I wouldn't necessarily be so quick to accredit science for that. I think lifespans were in fact severely shortened by the resultant 'Dark Ages' imposed by christianity rather than any other reason. Observing good sanitary practices wasn't exactly the hallmark of the dark ages. Well, we could go into some real horror stories there : P But really, I'm genuinely interested in what area of science you have a predilection
Khepramancer 7 months ago
@Khepramancer
Im a chemistry major (half way through 2nd year), but Ive done some biochem (im by no means an expert at biochem though, it bores the hell out of me). But yes Ill watch that vid and have a look through the literature.
As for lifespans, one of the greatest additions to the general populances health was the smallpox vaccine, which eradicated the disease which was from memory the no 1 killer of people, infecting most children and killing a large percentage of them = science win
Exorania 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Exorania ... by pharmacological methods. And this seems to be the final revolution.” Aldous Huxley (Brave New World)
I find that quote rather interesting, if nothing more than for it's anecdotal value here, given the nature of the video we are commenting on, and the implications it may suggest.
Khepramancer 7 months ago
@Exorania also, if you're into this sort of thing, a good video to watch of a renowned researcher (G. Edward Griffin) and his findings on cancer... search YT for "The Science and Politics of Cancer (2005)". Couldn't hurt to gain a new perspective, possibly try to verify or disprove his research.
Khepramancer 7 months ago
@Khepramancer
"renowned researcher (G. Edward Griffin)" He isnt a doctor though?
In any case, I just read a very confusing 2007 review which summarised all the past case studies that have been done, and it seems like more research should be done into laetrile, but that the toxicity of the substance is fairly high. Results from its use also seem all over the place.
"Laetrile for cancer: a systematic review of the clinical evidence" try an access it through springerlink. Im unsure if you can tho
Exorania 7 months ago
@Exorania You ask what 'greater mysteries' I was referring to? Well, what if anything is beyond death for a start. I'm not religious, so I don't expect the typical heaven and hell rhetoric. I am however a spiritual person, I believe certain things, that I think science (quantum mechanics, et al.) is coming to realize. Also from whence consciousness is derived? Again, QM could provide some clues. The nature of energy as we perceive it. Lots of things that science seems more than happy to ignore.
Khepramancer 7 months ago
@Khepramancer
Beyond death, my answer would be that there is nothing. Why would there be anything after death? Brain function stops, and youre thoughts reside in there in some form or another. Neuroscience is gradually unravelling consciousness and finding there is nothing truely magical about it, though it is incredibly complex and that in itself is amazing. I dont think science has ignored those things
Exorania 7 months ago
@Exorania I'm aware of the concept of wave / particle duality, what I'm asking is where is the energy coming from to sustain the structure of the electron, and it's fields (electric / magnetic)? An electron is constantly emanating energy in the form of fields... where is it coming from? I've been looking to O3 electrodynamics, as it seems more progressive than the standard model, but still seems a difficult phenomena to explain.
Khepramancer 7 months ago
@Khepramancer
Its simpler than that. The field is the natural state of the electron. The energy excerted by repulsion uses the energy from the collision, creating a potential energy, this energy is then converted into actual movement via repulsion as it is a lower energy state (re thermodynamics).
"energy in the form of fields" Its more of a static field (not really moving) rather than an emanating energy (which implies energy is being pushed from the electron).
Exorania 7 months ago
@Exorania One thing about science that disappoints me is that if someone in a certain time in science cannot perceive a means or method to measure a thing, then usually brash assumptions are made that it doesn't exist, then going into the literature, it is usually assumed afterward that the correct conclusion was made by subsequent scientists, and the topic closed. Take space for instance, once considered an empty void by most, is now a seething cauldron of energy. Many mistakes stacked... con
Khepramancer 7 months ago
@Khepramancer
Science determines, with all available evidence, the theory which best matches the evidence. Space was thought to be a void because certain parameters were unknown. In practical terms, space is in fact pretty damn empty. Supported scientific theorys are generally somewhat right, and they are adjusted when new evidence comes to light to create a better theory. Its how science and technology gradually gets better
Exorania 7 months ago
@Exorania .. together, makes for incomplete or wholly faulty theories. I know this is physics and not medicine, but look at the definition of energy. How about the electrostatic dipole of the electron... where does it come from? How does it continuously produce this energy without any apparent input? Then there's gravity... the list goes on and on. Science is more than happy not to explain these phenomena, but simply to gauge their values and move on... cont'd
Khepramancer 7 months ago
@Khepramancer
"How about the electrostatic dipole of the electron... where does it come from" Read a 12th (dunno what that is in the USA, senior school or something?) physics textbook. It doesnt continueously produce energy, that would defy physics itself. An electron isnt really a particle as strange as that may seem, as it exhibits wave like properties in equal measure.
Gravity is not being ignored, a huge amount of research is going on, the media just ignore it
Exorania 7 months ago
@Exorania Then the ridiculous notion that everything must be particles within particles within particles within particles. Which I've read 'alternative' theories that could nicely explain such things in realistic terms, but science wouldn't touch them even if they could be proven absolute. Too many careers and too much money at stake. From my perspective, science is all about making rich men richer, and keeping scientists employed under the current status quo.
Khepramancer 7 months ago
@Khepramancer
"ridiculous notion"How is it?
"I've read 'alternative' theories that could nicely explain such things in realistic terms" Id be curious to see how they explain the results of supercolliders. I want to explain what I know to you but its far too difficult here.I really recommend getting a higher education physics textbook. As it doesnt just give facts, they tell the reader how these things were worked out and why their theories are supported, and how these theories are employed today
Exorania 7 months ago
@Exorania Aside from all we've discussed, as I've shared with you my position on things, and you to me - have you ever looked into the research of Royal Raymond Rife? He developed and practiced what could be termed as 'Energetic Medicine', also invented a system of optics that, to my knowledge, have still yet to be rediscovered. As G. Edward Griffin explains in the video (which I watched last night after some of our discussion) if you follow the money, it will uncover much in terms of an agenda
Khepramancer 7 months ago
You, know why they do this. The know Republicans and Democrats are stupid, cause most Americans believe everything they tell them. Need to fucking wake up, America and accept the conspiracy theories as your truth.
ms420man 11 months ago
This is called Scientific tyranny. They use the te-LIE-vision to push their agenda.
soulflyz88 1 year ago
Totally Unreal.
m72mc 1 year ago
*examines statistics
HOW???????
HOW???????
Daghead 1 year ago
Where have these people outsourced their souls !?
manelmariarodrigues 1 year ago
Exactly why I don't watch the evil box. Only 1 channel and 1 channel only, the food network.
LieutendantDan 1 year ago
See, this is why I don't watch TV.
WTF1920 1 year ago 2
cutting of your foot MAY help, not harm you!
MrBsbs 1 year ago
Thanks for posting, dog. Well when you consider that the elite want to reduce world population by a minimum of 80% (just google "Georgia Guidestones") this makes perfect sense.
krickerd 1 year ago
WTF is wrong with people
StanwoodSpartans 1 year ago
One more comment...maybe my Dad is right, beer is better for you! LOL He always says "I don't drink water, I drink beer, it has natural spring water in it" funny
mythicstealth 1 year ago
Bullshiz it's good for you. Why did our parents yell at us when we broke a thermometer to play with mercury? Duh, it's poisonous. Yeah I get that chemo is a poison that kills cancer but that's the extreme. Toxins by consent-fine, given to innocent kids/adults NO! Putting crap in our water etc is horrific. Why not put friggin Oxycontin in the water, at least we'd be pain free. (sorry for my rant)
mythicstealth 1 year ago
This woman is an idiot and obviously she has had the lobotomy injected brain eating bacteria or else she wouldn't be expressing such garbage....
jdcc061 1 year ago
This demonstrates who is in charge of our media!!!! Mercury and flouride are neurotoxins!!!! Not brainpower enhancers. Amazing!!! We are so screwed!!!!
globalfabllc 1 year ago
what a load of S H I T!!!
Linux4UnMe 1 year ago
Im so dosile right now that mercury probably seems good for you, Hey folks, lets eat lots of mercury.
selenium is good for you to... google it, it gives you a life long heavy metal poisoning and gives you huge sores on your body ! inject it into you children, they get super smart.
FromDimmuLand 1 year ago
Ingest a battery, guys!
Arkanj3l 1 year ago
Mercury destroys neurological pathways in the brain in adults, it brain damages rats permanently and they are promoting it.
btn085 1 year ago
what their not understanding is Mercury is good for you
but what happens if certain people are allergic to it?
TAndrejko 1 year ago
@TAndrejko are you really that stupid??? We are all allergic to it!!!!! Mercury is one of the most poisonous metals known to man. What part of that do you not understand??
rennymyducky 1 year ago
lmfao ya no mercury is good for you
throwingshit 1 year ago
fucking joke
superkman8900 1 year ago
mmmmmmmmm...mercury...yumms...
billenh 1 year ago
We truly are living in the "matrix"! Everything people accept as truth is a lie!
RandyBful1 2 years ago 13
soo true
peace my friend
dodgydodds 2 years ago 2
mercury is safe is that what she said. I dont know if im hearing her right. we r in trouble if they think poison is safe to use in our diets and in the medicine we take. the government worst then the serial killers they put in prison and put to death in there practice fema concentration acts.
glen58316 2 years ago
HAHA.....
sikovit 2 years ago
Bacon is good for me. Like that little fat kid said. Not mercury !
samsamsonsoy 2 years ago
Mercury good for you...? And where's the experimental evidence to show for that?
Let's see them self-induce themselves with mercury to prove their theory, then afterwards maybe we'll talk.
MikeDecipher 2 years ago 2
i'm kinda scared and i thought that this would help but reading all these comments have made me worse!
my brother burst the themometer over the kettle and i went to get a cup of tea without anyone telling me! i'm scared i may have swallowed some glass or mercury! what should i do! pleaseee answer!! :(
XxxLeanne94xxX 2 years ago
OH how I love the media they mean us no harm,SEE!
DEADPATRIOT1 2 years ago 3
yeah mercury thats vitamin M just like we all need fluoride its vitamin F we are being purposly poisoned
MrCameron34 2 years ago 2
When are we all going to ban together and Go Kill the Illuminati? The Time is getting near that Evil will Be destroyed.
yourboyken 2 years ago
oh ill go get my kids injected then!
angelovlight 2 years ago
TV disinfo. The ususal stuff.
philwarinsky 2 years ago
seems to be loads around at the mo
dodgydodds 2 years ago
wow...wonder why they think we are so dumb? maybe cause we dont pay attention or kick up a fuss about anyyyyyything...you only sell dumb stuff to dumb people so lets wake up and get our country back
emannalyaqeen 2 years ago 2
WHAT. THE. FUCK.
motiongraphics81 3 years ago
lol only dumb sheep would consider that
hiphopper420w 3 years ago 3
Mercury is great for your body!! They should make brain nutrition tablets of pure mercury for the brain. Everyone knows mercury is brain food!! Take your mercury vaccines everyone, you dont want those evil moslem terrorists being smarter than you do you.
sonofhendrix 3 years ago
Ha Ha HA what utter b*llsh*t from the NWO media groups. WAKE UP PEOPLE use your common sense don't take this propaganda.
Lookup2Wakeup 3 years ago 3
If you want, you can read the results of the study I just did that found that repeated blows to the forehead with a 2lb. hammer will improve cognitive thought processes.
yankeepedaler 3 years ago 4
I don't know about you but I plan to go out and drain every mercury based product I can find and test it on their kids.If I did do that I wonder if they would say that mercury is harmless or even good for you when their kids go into a coma??? I wonder if I would be tried for murder or let go because I was doing the right thing for the kids?
mfoytek 3 years ago
That is same reason why you can't sue your doctor if he misdiagnoses you and gives you the completely wrong medicine. They are only "practicing" physicians.
devivortex 3 years ago
Yea, it seems like they literally are "practicing" on us... like we're guinea pigs! =( Well, I have to say than there are doctors who are just misled and really out to help people. It's the drug companies and the FDA that sickens me!
inthelight7771 3 years ago
And the facts remain that even a very small amount of mercury is extremely harmful to a grown adult let alone a baby in every test conducted. Animal or human. Mercury is considered toxic waste and peer review journals are only summaries of unofficial but published as "official" opinions. The same type of "opinions" that all "practicing" medical doctors can easily claim to be findings by their own biased slant.
devivortex 3 years ago
mjr256, if it so unharmful, then why has thimerosal never actually been case studied on humans, do you think it may be because the findings will allow alot of people to rape the big pharma companies of all there money in lawsuits, or is it because they no it's bad and it is in there deliberatley, i hate how some people just cant accept facts and common understanding,,, baaaaa baaaaaa
dodgydodds 3 years ago
Case studies are done all the time and now 7 recent studies specifically exonerate thimerosal. Plus every vaccine undergoes hundreds of clinical trials prior to being given to the public. In fact, most medicines can't get to the public fast enough because the clinical testing phase to ensure safety often takes years. That's how pharmaceutical companies best prevent lawsuits, by not putting them in the position to sell a dangerous product in the first place.
mjr256 3 years ago
yall a bunch of dumassess
mercurys a planet
greg350999 3 years ago
my my youtube is turnin ginto the muppet show,,, why you ask, because it is all full of muppets like this one ^^^^^^^^^^^ above
dodgydodds 3 years ago
I'm sorry, that was funny.
motiongraphics81 3 years ago
Yo the Dumb Ass Punk Kid!!
mfoytek 3 years ago
Epic lolz.
motiongraphics81 3 years ago
My bad I meant per billion not million. That's how potent mercury is.
devivortex 3 years ago
Those links don't work anyway. But toxic waste is considered harmful in 200 parts per million and there is 100 parts per million mercury in a vaccine shot. So more then one vaccine at a time is considered harmful toxic waste.
devivortex 3 years ago
Subordination. Whatever.
devivortex 3 years ago
You fail to realize that authority intrinsically means blind insubordination.
devivortex 3 years ago
And when you get in your car, do you blindly accept authority that it will work or do you think perhaps that you have good reason to believe it works? Do you trust the authority of the grocery store that they haven't poisoned the food you purchase or do you have good reason to suspect the food is more or less safe for consumption?
Welcome to society where since NO ONE is an expert in everything, we've figured out how to work together for the mutual benefit of the whole group.
mjr256 3 years ago
cont'd
Am I seriously to believe that if you had a serious medical condition that you wouldn't suddenly develop what you have the audacity to call "blind subordination" towards the attending physician? How easy for you to dismiss medicine you don't need to stay alive.
I suspect that like every1 else, you put a certain amount of trust into experts in every other arena every single day. I trust that your roof isn't going to cave in on you even though you didn't build it. Blind subordination?
mjr256 3 years ago
A roof is a known given. Suddenly adding mercury to my system is not.
devivortex 3 years ago
Besides it's not fear mongering. Who's afraid of this? That's like saying "Don't let me hear about anything that might harm me! Because that would be scary!" No! I don't want to know! Oh God the world is not all happy and fun! No! Oh my God!
devivortex 3 years ago
Your entire argument is predicated on a vast conspiracy involving the entire medical & pharmaceutical industries that you can't prove. You ignore the science, make no distinction btw. ethyl & methyl mercury or btw. safe levels & dangerous levels. All for the purpose of knocking down the scientific consensus that disagrees w/ you even though you have neither studied nor practiced medicine. Yet you have the audacity to tell people you know better & they shouldn't trust their doctors
mjr256 3 years ago
Yeah I don't think doctors know everything just because they went to school. All medical school does is teach you how to do surgery and what medicines to prescribe. Not how or why they work. And in case you are interested in my sources look up:
devivortex 3 years ago
No, you just think YOU know everything bc you have access to YouTube. It doesn't much matter to you whether you have good reasons for your beliefs or not so long as you can twist facts to support your presupposed conclusion
& for some1 who didn't actually attend med school you're hardly the best authority on what gets taught at med school. But thanks for making my point for me. That you consider YouTube a legitimate source for scholarly research suggests an overall poor academic education
mjr256 3 years ago
But since you brought it up I do believe there is a conspiracy of course there is a conspiracy. Only a fool would think there is no real motive to create a conspiracy. As long as money or if not money ego's of doctors that don't want to admit they are wrong and look foolish, simply ignore facts to hide the truth.
devivortex 3 years ago
After claiming I mis-characterized you for deducing exactly what your position was, now you're confirming I was right. Great job!
Now here is where you display your fundamental ignorance of the scientific process. It's actually in a scientists best interest to disprove past assumptions, not to confirm them. That's 1 of the main reasons it works so well.
Since it requires a long explanation, I recommend this 10 minute video that explains how the process of science works: watch?v=-h9XntsSEro
mjr256 3 years ago
* Vaccination - The Hidden Truth (1998) * Robert Kennedy on the Vaccine Autism Coverup * Mercury, Autism and the Global Vaccine Agenda * Dr. Mark & David Geier discuss the CDCs VSD database & Autism * Vaccines: The Risks, The Benefits, The Choices * The Vaccine Experiment - In The Service of Good * Texas Governor Perry Took Merck Money Before Mandating Cervical Vaccine * Stop the Mercury, Start the Cure
devivortex 3 years ago
All of politician RFK Jr.'s bogus claims have been thoroughly debunked ages ago. For the highlights you can check out:
skeptico blogs com/skeptico/2005/06/robert_f_kenned html
skeptico blogs com/skeptico/2005/06/lies_damn_lies_ html
It's one thing to just make a argument from authority but quite something else to dismiss over 99% of all the experts only to blindly accept the authority of a handful of fringe figures who can't even get the most basic facts right.
mjr256 3 years ago
It seems as though you are running out of arguments. I do not disagree with you on any of your points except one: Mercury in shots is unharmful. It is harmful and it is unlikely that your point of of view is anymore valid than mine.
devivortex 3 years ago
"Mercury in shots is unharmful. It is harmful and it is unlikely that your point of of view is anymore valid than mine. "
Declaring a falsehood is true doesn't make it so. Evidence-based science is always a better position than faith-based belief. One would do well not to take seriously any1 professing to be an expert on the effects of mercury who even know the difference between ethylmercury & methylmercury.
mjr256 3 years ago
Hey buddy, so it's funny how Jonas Sulk can find the cure for polio and make a vaccine that totally crippled the pharmaceutical bankroll a half century ago. Can you tell me sir, how many cures have been discovered since? zero....have we gotten dumber, or have we not spent as much money on research and technology. And if think big pharma is so morally sound why don't you research how many of its products have been yanked off the shelf and how many lawsuits they've had against them. Wake up buddy
davidfoshee 2 years ago
Sulk didn't even patent the vaccine & polio's been eradicated from all but 4 nations in the world. Small pox has been entirely eradicated from the world. Millions have been 100% cured of cancers & countless other life-threatening diseases. I never claimed "big pharma is so morally sound." That's YOUR STRAW MAN! & it's MY LOGIC that's fallacious?
None of this has anything to do mercury, which, BTW, is only in multi-dose flu vaccines, which no child even receives.
Give me evidence, not excuses.
mjr256 2 years ago
while you sound like an educated guy in your writing, your logic is that of a blind fish. To believe anything that mainstream media or our sociofascist goverment makes up is a crime in itself and is furthermore reasoning to discredit your intellect . Your fighting on the side that is controlled by a very few very powerful men. These are the same people who allow a non government body control our money (fed reserve), the same people who give us the FDA only to feed us the worlds worst food. con
davidfoshee 2 years ago
I go where the evidence is. It's you who blindly trust your own biases. Where's your evidence? Something can only be declared as true in so far as it can be demonstrated to be true with evidence. Shouting "my gov't ate my evidence" is not evidence; it's an excuse to keep believing in something despite the evidence. And while it could hypothetically still be true, it's not remotely persuasive to any rational person. Further, you reveal a complete ignorance of the scientific process.
mjr256 2 years ago
These are the same people who don't want progress. These men own their industry. Big oil, big pharma, big banking want complete control and use the media outlets to help brainwash american people. There has been medical breakthroughs that get brushed under the carpet by pharma. New fuel sources and energies that have been discovered but never allowed to flourish, why can't everyone see what I see. Use some common sense and know that money breeds power and power breeds corruption.
davidfoshee 2 years ago 13
Going back to my older comments, you seem to have no trouble putting a reasonable amount of trust in presumably every other arena. You trust your home was built securely, that your car will work in the morning, that it won't explode & its safety features will work. You trust your spouse. You put reasonable amounts of trust in all kinds of people every day. This is not naive blind trust & it may even disappear if given good reason to doubt. But the burden of proof is on those claiming conspiracy
mjr256 2 years ago
i here u bro. we r waking up. the time is near to get our minds right with yewah or Jehovah.
glen58316 2 years ago
@glen58316 You mean... Yahweh ?
Peaceinlifenowar 1 year ago
@Peaceinlifenowar yup!
glen58316 1 year ago
@Peaceinlifenowar so thats how u spell that name
glen58316 1 year ago
@davidfoshee If youre worried about that mercury content you or your child is having, worry about the content in big fish like tuna, not vaccines. There is more mercury in a serving of tuna (about 50ug) than the amount used as a preservative in vaccines (about 25ug per dose).
"medical breakthroughs... brushed under the carpet." Yes there are some things that are (molecules that already exist and cant be patented) however promising breakthroughs besides that are generally researched
Exorania 9 months ago
Comment removed
Khepramancer 7 months ago
@Exorania
"A typical 0.5 milliliter flu shot contains 25 micrograms - or 50,000 parts per billion - of mercury.
The EPA classifies a liquid with 200 parts per billion of mercury as hazardous waste. The limit for drinking water is 2 parts per billion."
By Raquel Rutledge of the Journal Sentinel
Nov. 13, 2007
______________________________________
Nice sidestepping the issue though.
Khepramancer 7 months ago
Also, I doubt officials are trying to make it mandatory to eat tuna.
Khepramancer 7 months ago
@Khepramancer
So is it hazardous because prolonged exposure to those concentrations is bad, or is it hazardous because mercury at that level is not easily removed from ecosystems and so builds up, (aka an accumulative toxin) or what? Also, the type of mercury compund is important
I was drawing the comparison between the amount of mercury in food compared to the amount of mercury in a shot I wasnt sidestepping the issue.
"I doubt ... mandatory to eat tuna" Is the flu shot mandatory in the USA?
Exorania 7 months ago
@Exorania Also, although I do not yet think that they have made vaccinations mandatory, they seem to be trying very hard to make it so. Do a google search for 'mandatory vaccinations' for articles about this.
Khepramancer 7 months ago
I never said there was any conspiracy to begin with. That point is something you projected onto me and has nothing to do with the facts. Also I don't know why my patent claim ignores 17 studies when the tobacco industry is prime example of a wealthy corporation that can invent as many studies as it wants to with paid off doctors. And if you follow the money trail all of those findings were conducted by people that make money off of thimerosal.
devivortex 3 years ago
A conspiracy is implicit. Either 99% of the entire medical community would then be incompetent or lying
You ignore 17 properly conducted clinical studies. Again, here's where the conspiracy issue comes up. Tobacco companies are notorious for inventing bogus studies but what does that have to do w/ this issue? Nothing. I'm talking about 17 carefully conducted studies under controlled clinical conditions. There are also people that make money off of car crashes; that doesn't mean they cause 'em.
mjr256 3 years ago
Also:# Stop Poisoning our Troops with Untested Vaccines
# Smoking Teeth = Poison Gas
devivortex 3 years ago
Just in case people want to look it up it's called thimerosal and it was made illegal in Denmark. The reason why they want it in shots is because whoever owns the patent on thimerosal gets billions of dollars from it and I'm pretty sure it's Eli Lily.
devivortex 3 years ago