2012 Ford F-650 with 6.8-liter V-10 Gas Engine

[psygtr22]

@psygtr22 The gas one doesnt put out as much horses or torque thts wat i ment

[psygtr22]

@rebelsike Yay but whoever buys this truck as a V10 then the are stupid i hate cummins but if i were to get this truck i would get the cummins in it just because it would be gas hog and it doesnt putout as much horses and torque

[GodFatherv12]

Ford sucks

[cumminsrkt]

am I the only one who muted this guy???

[rebelsike]

No the numbers for this engine aren't astronomical, but the engine is tuned to achieve its best numbers at a lower engine speed (rpm). The EcoBoost v-6 doesnt hit 365 hp til 5500 rpm, and 420 lbft til 3500rpm, where as the v-10 hits 362hp at 4750 rpm and 457 lbft at 2500 rpm. What that means is you dont have to run the engine as hard. Lower engine speed = less fuel use and ultimately longer engine life . The Ecoboost is a great engine, but theyre designed for different uses different purposes.

[Mrphatbastard1]

OOOOOOOOPS sounds like Ford has an overstock V-10s they need to burn through while they can still meet the current emission standards! Great marketing guys...

[LastWillandTesticle]

You're nuts to buy this truck w/ a V10 gutless gas pig. Opt for tha 6.7L Cummins

[BoJawadF]

How much is this monster!?

[ChevyBM]

fuck yeah B) thats awesome! 

[webhijacker1]

my dad has the v 10 gas one

[TheLargecars]

man screw that it retarded to put a gas engine in that thing diesel is so much better

[TheNewbpowner123]

Uhm the f350 superduty has a 6.8 liter v10 as well?

[tyrone121285]

With the right gearing I'm positive 90% of the people that will own one of these won't notice the difference in power from the diesels.

[subinct]

With Gas at 4$ a gallon, Ford decides its time to kill the Ranger !!

Dumb Ass Move Ford

[webhijacker1]

@subinct  your just jealous you cant afford it, because your a bum

[points2shopPROOF]

me want one for Christmas :D

[EM6285]

FORD MOTOR CO.please pay attention to this...Time to get an ECO-BOOST upgrade for the 6.8 V10! And make true that 7.0 V8 ECO-BOOST being rumored.

[EM6285]

$8,000 less than the DIESEL option. No need to worry about SELECTIVE CATALYTIC REDUCTION (SCR), DIESEL EXAUST FLUID (DEF), DIESEL PARTICULATE FILTER (DPF), DPF REGENERATION CYCLE (REGEN-wich consumes DIESEL FUEL) HIGH DIESEL FUEL PRICES, HIGH DIESEL REPAIR COSTS, 36% MORE COST TO OPERARE MODERN DIESEL ENGINES...Well, where is the DIESEL option advantage now??? DIESEL MPG??? Shattered by it's need for DIESEL EXHAUST FLUID and high MANTAINANCE and OPERATION COSTS. Don't blame me, is E.P.A's fault.

[EM6285]

I think this is a smart move for FORD. And the "virtual" advantage the DIESEL option may have over the V10 GAS option fades away. First the V10 GAS F650 will be $8,000 less than de DIESEL option. The fuel consumption advantage the DIESEL option has over the V10 (10%) even goes away if you consider that the DIESEL option NEEDS an aditional aditive called DIESEL EXHAUST FLUID for proper operation of the SCR SYSTEM. Add to that the DIESEL PARTICULATE FILTER wich consumes DIESEL fuel on its REGEN

[hannurk]

Natural Gas V10 wow ... now we r talkin

[hinesquarterhorses]

AND THERE IS A REASON THEY DONT PUT THEM IN THE F-250 TO THE F-550 , THEIR JUNK !!!

[hinesquarterhorses]

okay, i own a 2008 F-350 dually with the 6.8L V-10 and the 5 speed auto , wtf ??? .. their pieces of SHIT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! .... i get 5 AVERAGE MPG , it has no power , and its getting ready to blow up , why in the F*** would i want a F-650 with that piece of shit motor in it , grow the F*** up and buy a diesel , i am going to buy a 6.7 L diesel and never buying another gas motored truck , FORD MOTOR COMPANY - GET OUT OF THE OFFICE AND DRIVE ONE OF THESE TRUCKS FOR A LIVING

[keithgreen441]

@hinesquarterhorses -Whaaat? you own a "08 f350 DUALLY v10(Gas engine)"?and its about to blow up? ok, you ever heard of "Maintenance"?how in the living hell are you gonna blow up something like that, in such a short time?Theres nothing wrong with your truck, its the shithead owner that doesnt know how to do a simple oil change.I own a f 150 Saleen,and I just use it for cruising around, even my truck, the engine would blow up on a poor maintennance.Learn how to whip ur ass before buying a dually

[alandona3]

DAMN! ford is still using that pathetic V10?! at least ecoboost it and tune it for torque!

[wilburfudd]

did he say that the horse power was in the 300s....thats a little more than my car that has a 3.8L V6...maybe I miss herd him ......twice....

[Carscom]

@wilburfudd It's a truck, not a sports car. How much torque does your car have to plow a street?

[manoman0]

@wilburfudd lower HP means better mileage/gallon and more torque at lower RPM.

[macbookpro57]

@wilburfudd big trucks like this rely highly on torque more than they do on horesepower in sports cars

[torque395]

@wilburfudd 362hp 457ft lb torque. The torque is the important number. Horsepower isnt what does the work. Also the RPM at which the HP/TQ is made also matters. The V-10 will have a wider power band that starts and less RPM.

[atomiccheeseburger69]

@wilburfudd 363 horses

[Lambo6fo]

Medium duty? What does that make a Ranger? a non duty? wtf?

[porsche911sbs]

@Lambo6fo The Ranger, F-150, F-250, F-350, F-450, and F-550 are all light-duty trucks. The F-650 and F-750 are medium-duty trucks. Ford doesn't make any heavy-duty truck (those are produced by companies such as Freightliner, International, Mack, Peterbilt, and Volvo).

[mean71cuda]

imagine if they would have done the variable valve timing and all that new stuff like on the new "5.0L mustang" to that V10.. WITH ECOBOOST!! omg.. that shit would PWN!!

[igeekone]

Wow, this is a huge fail. Gas engine several ton vehicle = heart attack at the pump. Any respectful person will calculate fuel costs and see for a heavy duty work truck a diesel is the clear winner by miles.

[ShepperdW]

I think this guy is an idiot. The diesel gets enough better gas mileage to make up for the cost of diesel fuel to gas and the initial cost of one

[Carscom]

@ShepperdW You should watch the video over again. Ford says they think they can narrow the difference between gas and diesel in the F-650 application to about 10 percent (in favor of diesel). The latest national average for fuel shows diesel costing $.40 more than RUG plus you'll pay an extra $8,000 for a diesel over a gas engine at purchase time. Ford is betting states (many of which are facing budget problems) will opt for a lower-priced truck that runs on gas instead of diesel.

[ShepperdW]

@Carscom Nah. These big trucks need to run on premium to maintain proper function with these heavy loads. Premium and diesel 40 cents apart? Hell no. Maybe you should learn about trucks.

[LastWillandTesticle]

@Carscom You are not going to get any TORQUE from a gasser. Opt for the 6.7L Cummins instead. BTW 6.7L Powerstoke is NOT an option!

[manoman0]

@ShepperdW No, he's not. Dieselengines only pay off doing miles, miles and more miles (Transport etc.)

[ShepperdW]

@manoman0 What the fuck do you think these trucks will be used for?

[manoman0]

@ShepperdW I think you want to reply to the presenter, not to me...

[ShepperdW]

@manoman0 ?

[manoman0]

@ShepperdW nevermind. Or: I don't think we have different opinions, maybe some misunderstanding on my part. or your part. I'm fine.

[rocketballa4life]

that engine is complete shit.

[NissanTy]

this engine was kind of sluggish in the super duty, i could only imagine how much of a dog this thing will be in this big ass thing. and the sterring wheel, ford hasn;'t used that steering wheel since what? like 2005? got that freshened up interior with an old steering wheel. we'll see how this truck performs, with 457 lb ft of tq, this thing shouldnt be too bad.

[robe2708]

twin turboed and put it in a mustang hellll yeahhh

[juukyuu7666]

@SixHundredHP

lmao

[Ji99i3]

i know nothing about trucks, forgive my ignorance, but the power numbers seem compatible low for such a big engine no? am i completely missing something? i know the price difference is huge and their is no comparisons but forgive me for saying, some mercedes top 800 torques and the they're coming from v8s. Again, forgive the ignorance.

[t0k1d0k1eighty8]

@Ji99i3 basically, that truck weighs like a million tons thats why.

[flynmid]

@Ji99i3 Making an engine put out more power causes excess stress on the engine, as does pulling around 20,000 lbs. They could make this engine put out 800lb/ft, but doing that combined with the very heavy loads it will have to cope with will destroy the engine very quickly...They are aiming for longevity and low cost operation, not performance

[LTF85199]

Wow, a gasoline commercial truck that will comparable to a diesel?, image what kind of power or energy savings they can achieve from a real diesel truck incorporating these latest technology.

[bmw760li150]

No crew cab?

[Alex19al]

looks like anaheim and orange county found a new, just fucking great

[Hummers222]

Damn this is a hot truck. I want one!

[DavidWood17]

A skinny guy talking about trucks? wtf

[WoZIMoo]

Take that junk 6.8 out and make an Ecoboost with the new 5.0 block... If the 3.5 Ecoboost makes 365hp and 420lbs/ft imagine how deadly a 5.0 would be..

[DevPack]

that steering wheel is huge

[lostchildren]

The steering wheel is from 1998!!!

[jacoale]

@lostchildren LMAO!

[jacoale]

0-60--- It's gonna be a while folks 

[mrjost55]

@lostchildren It's vintage :D

[Fuscoooo]

@lostchildren o sh%t it is loooool. left over stock!

[workingmen1]

SEE THE VIDEO FROM GM CALLED

( WHEN CAR DEALERS ATTACK )

[Zephas99]

What about doing an eco-boost make-over on that V10?

[manoman0]

@Zephas99 How about a Twin-SC??

[torque395]

@Zephas99 Good god. Could you imagine the sheer power that beast would have? Even a twin turbo V V T and high pressure direct injection on the 5.4 would be awesome.

[timarc124]

Sealed beams in 2011 ?

[ratmtbola]

6.8l V10 and only 362hp? Really? What bullshit. And the torque aint that great either. Other manufacturers get the same ammount of power and torque from a much smaller V6 / inline-6. And that while getting way better mileage than this huge V10 aswell.

As great as Fords latest cars and trucks might be ... hands down, they still can't build good engines. The new V6 EcoBoost engines might be an exception, but then again, those were designed and first built in Europe ...

[FordNissanChevy]

@ratmtbola its not meant to be a high performance engine, sure people can get 600+ HP with an engine less than half the size of this, but this engine will last 10 to 20 times longer, plus a high performance motor cost more $ too.

[ratmtbola]

@FordNissanChevy Yeah I know, it's not meant to be a high performance engine. But then, why did they go for a nearly 7l big gas guzzling V10 instead of a much more economical V8 or even V6 that produces the same ammount of power and torque?

[CaughtMyDream]

@ratmtbola exactly. what i was thinking.

[telj1]

@ratmtbola You do realize this a work truck, medium duty???

[ratmtbola]

@telj1 Yes, and? Who says that a work truck has to have a V8 or even a V10 like this one? A good V6 would make the same ammount of power and torque, while using much less gas than the V10. So why not use one?

[telj1]

@ratmtbola So why not use one??? hmmmm..... you let me know of a heavy work duty v6/v8 truck that is successful @ it's task. NON-diesel But then again I'm no engineer. I'd like to believe they'd push out the most efficient overall product that is possible @ the time to benefit the company.

Most passenger car engines are getting smaller/more efficient. Maybe in a few years more options on larger vehicles will follow...????

[ratmtbola]

@telj1 You want to know a heavy work duty truck with a V6/V8 that's succesful? Just turn your head to Europe or Japan (or basically anywhere outside and the US) and you'll see nothing else besides V6's and V8's in heavy duty work trucks.

And if a V8 or V6 can get the exact same ammount of power AND torque, while getting much better mileage, then why not use? Thise huge V10 is just a huge waste of gas.

[MfalmeVTold]

not first!!!

[andreshates]

first!!!