Abortion is denial of human destiny the number of players on the team are simply not complete some don't care only for themselves Providence seemingly has no value to them.
Abortion is denial of human destiny the number of players on the team are simply not complete some don't care only for themselves Providence seemingly has no value to them.
The CCC states that those who give "formal cooperation in abortion" incurs excommunication latae sententiae", automatic excommunication. That includes the doctor, his staff, politicians, religious those who support abortion. They can call themselves Catholic till they are blue in the face. No priest is brave enough to say this Turth in the pulpit. Only Fr. Corapi& Fr. Casey have the grace to tell us the Truth. Read CIC canon law 1398, 1314, 1323-24, CCC#2272, Code of Canon Law 1354-1357.
On the date of my post, 1/22/10, we celebrate the victory of Protestant Scott Brown over Catholic Martha Coakley.
Coakley was seeking the seat of deceased senator Edward Kennedy. Both Coakley and Kennedy were powerful advocates of unlimited abortion rights, whereas the non-Catholic Brown has stated his belief in curbs to abortion rights, an example being the ban on partial-birth abortion.
Catholics continue to vote for and promote abortion, no matter what these videos say.
You're a fool. I know for a fact that Martha Coakley is not a Catholic. She said that Catholics should not work in hospitals because their religious views on abortion (which is being pro life). If anything she bashes Catholics as much as she can. I'm Catholic and every Catholic that I personally know is pro life.
Know your facts before you start spouting off on Youtube.
From the Martha Coakley biography dated september 3, 2009 and appearing in Western Massachusetts News:
"Coakley, a Catholic, said church and her parish were a big part of family life. She attended the St. Joseph's School in North Adams, and she transferred to Drury High School in North Adams for her senior year. She said that she graduated No. 10 in her class in 1971."
So take your stupid, lying Democrat ass to school and get an education in how to tell the truth.
Oh, really? Why do so many of you lie about yourselves?
So tell me, genius.....according to you what is the religious affiliation of Martha Coakley?
How about Vice President Biden? Nancy Pelosi? The deceased Senator Ted Kennedy? The other current Massachusetts senator, John Kerry?
Answer: ALL CATHOLICS, and ALL have dedicated their public lives to support the RIGHT of women to terminate their pregnancies whenever they want. And it's the Catholic VOTE that keeps them in office.
not all Catholics. Those you mention use the Catholic "name" for politics and blaspheme the catholic teachings. They are not truly Catholic if they approve or add to murder/abortion.
You are right! The CCC states that those who give "formal cooperation" in abortion incurs excommunication latae sententiae". That's automatic excommunication. It does not require the act of a bishop, God does it. Formal Coop means those who perform it, & all who recommendsuggest it, politician& religious who support it and/or vote in favor of it".
Read CIC cannon law 1314, 1398, 1323-24. CCC #2272.
I'm not sure it matters whether we are catholic or not, as long as we are Christian and we serve the Lord, we are going to the same place. I'm protestant. Sounds like you are pro-life. I am too.
I would consider changing to Catholicism, but it is great you are a christian if you want to deepen your religion with the oldest most profound one available I suggest this but you are doing good anyway my friend god bless you!
not every mother who's unfit to raise her kid can't afford to raise her kid, or rape or incest victim's child will make it to the moon. i don't think neal armstrong or buzz aldrin fell into those categories.
hotter fire burn down the vatican! them a babylon... wolf in sheep clothing. rastafari king of king lord of lords conquering lion in the tribe of judah elect of jah ever living jah earths rightful ruler! i man give thanks and praise while chalice, blaze weak heart conception, sellassie I correction, cramp and paralyze them and those that worship babylon! fire burn down the vatican. shit! the only reason catholics r against abortion is becaue they have lil kid fetishes
That's good because faith is a gift from God. It seems to me humakullen that the desire of your heart is for the greatest good. Continue to seek the truth and more will be revealed to you in time.
Well, I guess the subject of God is a different "can of worms" all together; especially since humans can't even agree on what it is. Is God an entity, life force, supra consciousness or simply more advanced beings who created us;-)? It's obviously beneficial to believe in "something" if it gives you meaning and purpose in life. However; since there has been over 4000 religious belief systems throughout history, claiming to give us "spiritual truths", I have my doubts.
FACTS; Since we are "stuck" in a world of duality, death is just as natural as birth. Taking a piss or sh*t is just as natural as drinking or eating. You can't have one without the other. The only thing we can do is to strive for a balance in life. That includes matching the population density with the available resources. Your agenda and highest priority in life is to make sure every pregnancy comes to full term and results in a birth; after that you could care less.
It's very weird and inconsistent how a PRO-LIFE believer value an unborn fetus more than a living child. IMAGINE if all their work and effort had gone to saving the more than twenty thousand children who die every day in hunger, malnutrition, malaria and lack of clean water. Why is it that every time a pro-lifer cites the "VALUE OF LIFE" they conveniently forget about the millions of childrens who suffer horribly every day.
Seems to me that someone has their priorities screwed up...
humalakullen please consider that all life is valuable to God.. all human life from the moment of conception until death even Louis Farrakan understands this.,but of course he excludes infidels
Awesome video!!<333 Thank you so much to the people of CatholicVote for posting your inspirational videos.:) I hope that they will inspire more pro choice Catholics to know that Jesus calls us all to be open to life. Keep the videos comin' people!!!:)
We don't have any problems with females heads of state, astronauts, fighter pilots and soldiers make life and death decisions. Why should there be any different when it comes to her own body and wellbeing? If people are so "GENUINLY" concerned about innocent childrens right to have a life worth living, then focus all your energy on making sure they have health care. Stop sex trade and child pornography. Fight to end abuse, neglect and hunger. Or is that to much work?
We also fight those things to, what are you doing to stop all those you listed? The Imagine spots is from a Catholic site, there are many Catholic org.,that help in those areas you listed.
rooforlife71, WHAT I'M DOING? Food, clothes and money donations like most people. In college I even called the FBI on my own room mate because I suspected he was up to no good. He is now serving an 11year sentence in Colorado for child molestation (on his own daughter). I'm telling you, there are a lot of people out there who shouldn't even be allowed to have kids.
rooforlife71, But killing and waging war against each other on the pretense of religion and God is justified? Sure, let's invite even more tragedy in our society by letting women with severe mental impairments give birth. Women serving life sentences on death row, being raped by their fathers or enemy soldiers. Drug addicts or psychopaths. It's very easy to invoke "God's rule" of life, if God actually had been responsible for the feeding, nurturing and effort it takes to have a functional life.
By that same thought,should we not also kill the poor,the depressed, the children starving in Africa,or anyone else who suffers?After all,in OUR estimation their lives are not worth living,it's just too painful for them.Oh,they disagree?Well, they just aren't smart enough to know what's good for them! so shut down the soup kitchens and the humanitarian aid! let us take up arms and seek the suffering of the world, that we may release them from their valueless lives in a hale of gunfire!
If one were to open a 'Dog' Abortion mill where puppies were ripped from the mothers womb we would not be having this conversation because there would be a war in the USA over it. But since it is 'only' human life most people do not care. Remember Slavery used to be legal but nobody says it was right.
I love liberals who think an agregious violation of a woman's rights when she can't kill the life she created, but some goddamn lawyer in Washington should be able to tell me what to drive, what medical care I deserve, and who I have to hire!
Pretending that every fetus is going to be the next president is like pretending that every fetus is going to be the next Hitler. Your argument is illogical.
Pretending a fetus is not a human being, thus enittled to the same rights you and I have, is what's illogical. The only way to PROVE any one child won't be a ground breaking president is to let it live long enough for us to find out.
I never said anything about it not being a human being. By giving the fetus the right to occupy a woman's body against her will, you are taking away the womans rights. Going through a pregnancy is a great choice, but there is no reason that a woman must sacrifice so much from herself for the well being of the fetus. This isn't about whether or not it's a human. It's about whether or not women should have their rights taken away when they're pregnant, and the answer to that is NO.
You don't have the right to kill someone you invited into your home, and claim they were breaking in. A woman CHOOSES to risk having the responsibility of supporting a life inside her when she has sex. Her will and rights are a moot point when compared to the basic right to life. Nobody has the right to kill another human being just because they are dependent on them for survival. The basic right to life is more important than the temporary effects on the mother's body, which are her own fault.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
No, I am not inviting a fetus into my body when I have sex . If I became pregnant, it'd be against my will. Saying that a woman's rights are moot when she is pregnant just proves your misogynistic tendancies. No body should be forced to sacrifice their own body in order to help someone else. If people aren't donating blood, no one is going to strap you to a chair and force you to give blood so that another person can live. It may be the nice thing to do, but it'd be an infringement on our rights
It is not "against your will" if you get pregnant as a result of willingly taking that risk. It's just unintentional. Nobody intends to lose their money gambling either, but when you do, it's not theft when the casino collects.
No one is advocating the forced pregnancy of anyone else. If you want to be 100% baby free, there is one way to do that. Make your choice, take your risks. Dodging the responsibilities that come with your choices does not outweigh the right to life of another person!
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Uh, so if I'm pregnant, and I don't want to go through the pregnancy but I have no choice but to.. Then it's not forced?
And no, it has nothing to do with your username. It has to do with your disregard for womens' experiences when it comes to pregnancy. I don't want control over other peoples' lives, that's what anti-choicers want. I want control over MY body and MY life, and if it might mean the death of a fetus, then so be it. If wanting control over my body is pathetic, then so be it.
All you pro-deathers really have accomplished is help irresponsible men get out of their own obligations and get away with infedelity. Even "Roe" doesn't buy into this crap that it's a feminist position anymore!
The woman might attempt to deny this fact of nature, but nevertheless, the act of sex is allowing the possibility of pregnancy (even? if not intended), and that in itself, is giving the baby (another person), permission to use her body or organs. Since women are intelligent human beings (and thus realize this), if a new life should be created, she does not then have the right to kill that new, separate, living person.
I have a feeling you are terrified of ever having to practice the slightest restraint and self control with your ability to create life. Are you really so pathetic you need to have this feeling of God like control over someone's life and death?
The permission for the baby to use the womans uterus is granted by the decision of the woman to have sex. As mammals and as human beings, the act of sex is designed to create new life. This is not to say that sex was meant to be used always as a means of procreation, but the possibility of creating a new life IS there every time we have sex.
angelshoulders, I think we can all agree that abortion should never be used as another form of birth control. AND NO; Pro-Choice doesn't mean Pro-Abortion. However; there will always be cases where abortion would be the best outcome for everyone involved. If you were a fetus and somehow made aware that you were going to spend your life with severe mental and physical handicaps, just because your mother is a drug addict for example. Would you consider that life a gift full of possibilities?
"Human rights are not a privilege conferred by government. They are every human being's entitlement by virtue of his humanity. The right to life does not depend, and must not be declared to be contingent, on the pleasure of anyone else, not even a parent or a sovereign." ~Bl. Teresa of Calcutta
"The real question today is not when human life begins, but, 'What is the value of human life?' The abortionist who reassembles the arms and legs of a tiny baby to make sure all its parts have been torn from its mother's body can hardly doubt whether it is a human being." ~President Reagan, 1983
sarahfwilson, Hmm... Interesting. The worlds population increases by about 75 million people every year (mostly from under developed countries). Of those, 6 million children will die of hunger and malnutrition (16,000 per day). Malaria alone kills an additional 4000 people every day, and the list goes on. Why don't you ask "mother nature" or "God" about the "value" of their lives?
hum...and as a pro-deather, she also has the 'choice' to kill her baby too! Why do you defend the murder of babies anyway? Do you hate children, or women?
So now you are twisting the truth, instead of attempting to answer my questions about the value of life? All the women in the world could come together tomorrow and decide that they will never have an abortion. As a Pro-Choiser, not only would I support that decision, but I would never even coerce women one way or another. Pro-lifers coerce women to give birth, citing the value of life, but then don't seem to have any problems with women in uniform killing innocent victims in war for example.
hum..you lack reason.There is no comparison to killing unborn precious,defenseless little babies & war.You say you are pro-choice,I beg to differ, you are pro-death.Why do you defend a mother's 'right' to kill her baby? You not only condone it, but here you are defending it!!
You haven't even realised the inconsistencies and absurdities in your views (and never will) as long as you base your arguments on emotions, and contradictory religious dogma. There is a famous quote that says:
"Kill a few people and you are called a murderer, kill a few thousand and you are called a conqueror". U catch my drift...?
Spoken like a true pro-deather. Thanks for representing and letting us all know what pro-deathers think. They should all be very proud of you. At least you will admit what they do not!
Women have the right to terminate anything growing within them, whether it's a tapeworm or a fetus. Neither you nor your government can nor should be able to decide for them.
When the world's human population was 6 billion, these could all have fitted into the State of Texas. Every person would have had some 1300 sq. feet of space, leaving the rest of the world completely EMPTY. I am not, of course, suggesting this is a viable proposition, but it illustrates my point - 'overpopulation' is a complete MYTH. Granted, the world population is expanding, but the RATE of expansion is rapidly declining. It will peak out at less than 9 billion long before the year 2050
Overpopulation is NOT a myth by any means, just because we are able to fit inside of a given area with a certain amount of space says nothing about the amount of pollution and the rate of usage of resources that occur due to the population. The rate of expansion is not declining.
mother Earth is currently producing enough food to sustain 13 billion human inhabitants - and this on a mere fraction of the available rain-fed arable land. Ignore the trendy media spin-misers and concentrate instead on the FACTS. In the days of horse and cart, doomsayers were predicting that the streets of Manhattan would soon be '3 feet deep in horse manure', such was the rate of development. Then along came the motor car.Sound to me like "you don't like to share",we were taught young to share
angelshoulders, I think you are a spin-miser who base your argument on feelings instead of facts, to further your own agenda. Where did the "13 billion" come from? What happens if/when we reach that? Is abortion going to be recommended then, or is another pro-lifer going to suggests mother earth can support 26 billion people? You conveniently forgot to mention all the chemical fertilizers, pesticides and growt hormones it takes to feed the current population. Twice the trash and pollution etc...
hum...There is a big difference between a miscarraige or spontaneous abortion and the deliberate killing of an unborn living human being!! You may come up with all sorts of excuses to deliberately end life,but it is still just that,ending a human life!!
hum."...The abortion-rights folks know it, the anti-abortion folks know it, and so probably, does everyone else. One of the facts of abortion is that women enter abortion clinics to kill their fetuses. It is a form of killing ...you're ending a life." Ron Fitzsimmons, Executive Director, National Coalition of Abortion Providers, New York Times, 26 February 1997 Note the word 'probably'..obviously this is too complicated for you!
hum...You are sorely mistaken. What gives you the crazy idea that pro-lifers value an unborn child any more than a born child? We do not,we do expect respect for human life to hold true at every stage of developement.
hum.We do not have the right to decide for another person whether or not his life is worth living. such rationale still leads to the extreme . We euthanize animals because they do not make decisions for themselves, because they are lesser beings in our care. but human children are not lesser beings, and so the decision should be there's alone. granted, many do suffer abuse, but does common sense truly show that it is better to make a murderer's job easier?
"thou shalt not kill" is just as much an imposition as being robbed at gunpoint. and if imposing our beliefs onto others is such a bad thing, why should we impose our beliefs onto an unborn child?Then I guess we shouldn't 'press' our 'beliefs' on the murderer or rapist....I WOULD NEVER MURDER OR RAPE, but it's not up to me to decide for others what they might want to do.....Right??? WRONG.
hum.. Abortion is not a belief, it's the murder of a baby and the injury; emotional, physical and even sometimes spiritual, to the mother. Please DO NOT FORGET, MOST women do not want abortion...they are threatened with violence, abandonment and no support and 'forced with no CHOICEyou can't kill a child just to save your own skin. that's pretty self evident for those already born, but when we're talking about people we can't readily see without ultrasound, it's easy to rationalize
hum...You can't do that without committing murder.. killing children to "protect" them from a life of hell necessarily implies that we should also kill everyone else in the world who is ALREADY living a life of hell. if you are so eager to kill unwanted babies out of misplaced compassion, why are you not also eager to kill the masses of starved and diseased people in the world? isn't killing them a necessary evil? see the contradiction? it's very important
By that same thought,should we not also kill the poor,the depressed, the children starving in Africa,or anyone else who suffers?After all,in OUR estimation their lives are not worth living,it's just too painful for them.Oh,they disagree?Well, they just aren't smart enough to know what's good for them! so shut down the soup kitchens and the humanitarian aid! let us take up arms and seek the suffering of the world, that we may release them from their valueless lives in a hale of gunfire!
hum..How about the starving or those with lousy personal lives or the depressed while they suffer (for now at any rate), does this mean that their lives our valueless? Should they not be the ones to decide that?do you not support law enforcement or prisons for hardened criminals? if you do, are these not the most blatant forms of pressing your beliefs onto others? you will find that to have any moral code at all involves imposing your beliefs onto others
angelshoulders, Let me know when you are done with all that emotional rambling and actually start using logic and facts to answer my previous questions.
How come you value a fetus more than a living child?
Mother nature does it's best of controlling overpopulation, but you claim earth can support 13 billion (then what?).
Why is abortion "murder" but the death of children due to neglect and lack of resources OK?
hum..no one here said that the death of children due to neglect or lack of resources was OK. Certainly I did not say that. But then you have changed the subject. We were talking about the killing on unborn children.
hum..You are pro-death,you not only condone it,you support&defend abortion.You even encourage a mother hiring a hit man to forcibly enter her womb with the sole intention of dismembering,tearing,ripping her little baby into pieces.Then with his cold,hard tools of his trade,suctioning out the tiny body parts into a stainless steel colander to be reassembled.FOR MONEY!When you say pro-choice,you are pro-death.
Hahaha.... If you focused all that "passion" and energy on saving the thousands of suffering children, it would be a better world already (since you are so concerned about life;-). Even better, why don't you take that pro-life crusade to China, and tell them to stop all their abortions and lift their ban on "one child per family". I'm sure the world would be a happier place with 2 billion Chinese instead of just 1billion;-).
hum..I do notice that you are pointing fingers,and you have your own pointing back at you. What exactly is it that makes you so defensive? Are you putting your efforts and passoin regarding the support, defense and encouragement of killing babies to any other use? Best be careful when you spend the same amount of time trying to get mothers to kill their babies.Instead of doing your cause you think everyone else should be doing.The problem w/that is called govt.,even if we tried,failure is due.
hum...we would all like to see all the injustices of the world disappear,but unfortunately,evil in govt. persists & blocks the best efforts of us all.Just like in the case of abortion.We all know killing babies is wrong,but have a difficult time changing anything.We live among selfishness, greed, uncaring hard cold ppl. So long as this is around,we have our hands tied.Have you tried to help? I found my money going for everything and everyone but who I intended it for. Sad & a true shame.For now.
The only finger I'm pointing is at the flaws, contradictions and inconsistencies in your cause. especially when you compare it to all other travesties and suffering that goes on in the world. As a pro-choicer I don't have any cause or agenda to defend, since a woman can decide to give birth (instead of abortion) and I will support that as well. Problem solving debates, based on logic and objectivity always wins over feelings and emotions.
hum..So basically you are saying that a mother killing her infant is okie dokie,peachy keen and you are the cheerleader beside her gurney wipping the sweat off the forehead of the abortionist. WOW. I can only feel sorrow for you. You have no morals, values and human life is nothing to you.
angelshoulders, SO YOU FEEL SORRY FOR ME, but not the millions of children who die every year in neglect, abuse, starvation, malnutrition and so severely mentally and physically handicapped due to a mothers drug-use and alcoholism??? Interesting....
hum..I have already explained my position on this.Why do you insist in turning this conversation into a redundant circus?I have little children who can carry a better conversation than this,at least they remember what has been said. You throw red herrings out there all over the place. It does not change a thing.If you want to stay on the topic at hand,let me know.
hum...again. You have to show me where any pro-lifer has ever said that the unborn baby is more valuable then the born baby. The burden of proof is on you. You are the one's making all these claims.You are putting horrible words in our mouths.You answer the questions.You are the accuser!!!
hum...You ask me what then...I say it is very easy to see wrong, like slavery, and not have all the answers.That does not mean slavery is not a problem,it means I have no immediate solution to the problem.Again I ask you and you do not answer. Who said death of children due to neglect & lack of resources is OK! You accuse me, yet you cannot show me where I or any pro-lifer has ever said that!!
hum..And take the easy way out when in a tight spot, even, as in this case, if it kills somebody The point you have been conveying is that, if a child is likely to undergo pain and suffering in his life, he should be exterminated for his own good before he is born. or, if a girl is going to suffer for her pregnancy, she should exterminate her child before he is born. the whole point of this argument has been to show that, whatever the circumstances surrounding a human's conception
The other point I would now like to make is that mother Earth is currently producing enough food to sustain 13 billion human inhabitants - and this on a mere fraction of the available rain-fed arable land. Ignore the trendy media spin-misers and concentrate instead on the FACTS. In the days of horse and cart, doomsayers were predicting that the streets of Manhattan would soon be '3 feet deep in horse manure', such was the rate of development. Then along came the motor car.
They never seem to link their Malthusian perspective with their support of abortion "rights."Quotas on the # of children per family seem tyrannical.Its better to glorify"abortion rights" &get the people worried about overpopulation.Better to distribute the kool-aid.Can you not see that if euthanasia becomes 'voluntary', this is only one step away from when it is made COMPULSORY. Once we embark upon that slippery slope, where will it all end?
Pro-lifers aren't telling women what they must do with their body. They are telling women what they can't do to a fetus When I hear this idiotic "woman's body" argument, it's a bit like hearing a landlord saying he has a right to kill tenants, because they're living in his house. There is pure demonic evil in that argument.
That is a straw man. To compare a house to a womans body when she is impregnated falls a little bit short of a true comparison due to the fact that the house isn't terminating the residents, and all of these residents are fully developed.
Pro-lifers have no right to tell a woman what to do with a fetus when it is growing inside of her.
just...Understand this.You get laid in order to procreate.Now I understand their adolescent minds do not fathom the fact that yearning for sex is evolutions way of insuring procreation.However,may their mind ingest this.The end result of unfettered abortion &your get a life and get laid attitude will be the extinction of the human species. This is precisely why abortion must be fettered.One can only imagine this conversation if your mother bore your same attitude toward (your)life and abortion
Although pleasure is a way of ensuring procreation, humans use condoms and birth control to stop from getting impregnated. Until i wish to have children i get laid to fulfill my sexual urges.
Actually my mother had an abortion earlier in her life when it would be detrimental to her progress and ability to provide and give a good life to the child. then she had me. We are not going extinct (that is unless we let the population get uncontrollable).
Pro-choice is pro-abortion is pro-death. If you condone,support&defend a mother's 'choice' to kill the baby she helped to create, you are pro-abortion.If I were to be born with mental & physical handicaps,I would rather have life than death! I want to live. Life is beautiful & worth some sacrifice, more sweet then sour!
I pray all the time for those little ones who are murdered by arrogant parents and by the hands of the murdering doctors... May god give full wrath on those who kill the innocent ones.
bycot CNN+NBC...not to mention the writers who are ocd over abrtin/sterilizing women in DOOLs (which ruined that soap for me!)...there was a petition against that stupid new politically biased DOOL writer! i think i had signed it years ago...he hates women...he covers it up by showing his hate for prebrn kids.
I don't get it. The Catholic Church condemns abortion, but does nothing to the politicians who vote for it. Pelosi, Kennedy, Biden, Kerry and Sebelius (all huge Catholics) support RADICAL abortion agendas, but yet are still part of the Church.
So until the Church takes action against those who enable abortion (i.e., excommunication), these videos are a giant waste of time.
It's like the Muslims who say Islam is peaceful, but then fail to condemn terrorism. What's the difference?
People like Pelosi can call themselves Catholic all they want. At the end of the day, however, she is no Catholic. Time to start calling them what they are - Catholics In Name Only, or CINOs.
That might be the case. But until the Catholic Church does anything to distance themsleves from these politicians who support abortion (and gay rights), then there is really no difference in my mind. Why does the Catholic Church still allow them to take communion?
Pope had said that(some) Christians/Catholics are fakes, but i don't know exactly wat he had said.I think he was talkin bout the fakes who claim they are religious when they are actually evil bby-mrdrers who don't act religious. No, i'm not Catholic + i don't know the Bible texts. I'm an independent thinkr who is peaceful +has very prlife views(but if 'redrum' wasn't evil/illgal, i wouldn't be living +neither would nonbelievers against RightToLife).
they cannot stand...the truth...the truth scares them! their fear of caring about the noisy youth is irrational. I have siblings to put up with, so noisy (and dirty diapers when they were little was)is something i put up with on and off. Don't like/want bbies? get your tubes tied, LIB.S! WE DON'T NEED ABRTION! WE NEED THE EVIL CHILD-HATERS TO TIE THEIR TUBES! same goes for communist sxist men in China!
Another excellent commercial - the only one who stands between a child and his or her potential is it'smother.....[not her circumstances as one of your other commercials pointed out]
Shocking, isn't it. I'm baffled that people will call themselves Catholic and absolve themselves by saying that supporting less deaths is better than supporting NO deaths.
If you can't figure out how a baby taking it's first steps at 80 wks relates to Neil Armstrong taking the first steps on the moon at 2024 weeks, then you really should refrain from handling sharp objects and stay away from cliff edges.
Hint: ABORTION KILLS HUMANS before they can accomplish ANYTHING. Even that first step!
@ext39 estoy 100% de acuerdo!!
jenngaldamez 8 months ago
So wait, in 2024 weeks he'll invent the time machine and become Neil Armstrong? That's what I'm getting from the video.
Mindflash 9 months ago
i don't like that it's become a trademark.
that's bullshit.
i believe that abortion is wrong.
but i don't believe in advertising it like its a competition.
its an opinion.
people are allowed to live their lives.
Xunderscorel0l0 9 months ago
1 Cor. 15:46-47 says, "However, the spiritual is not first, but the natural; then the spiritual."
DaSungandSoul1223 1 year ago
Abortion is denial of human destiny the number of players on the team are simply not complete some don't care only for themselves Providence seemingly has no value to them.
ToomuchBTUstoday 1 year ago
Abortion is denial of human destiny the number of players on the team are simply not complete some don't care only for themselves Providence seemingly has no value to them.
ToomuchBTUstoday 1 year ago
I cried. Thank god for these.
DarwynxRivver 1 year ago
Great video! Though I would like to point out that the footprint shown at the end belongs to Buzz Aldrin and not Neal Armstrong.
RhinoBarbarian 1 year ago
The CCC states that those who give "formal cooperation in abortion" incurs excommunication latae sententiae", automatic excommunication. That includes the doctor, his staff, politicians, religious those who support abortion. They can call themselves Catholic till they are blue in the face. No priest is brave enough to say this Turth in the pulpit. Only Fr. Corapi& Fr. Casey have the grace to tell us the Truth. Read CIC canon law 1398, 1314, 1323-24, CCC#2272, Code of Canon Law 1354-1357.
md3424 1 year ago
These commercials should air on television at some time like the "Life what a beautiful choice" ads did in the 1990's.
Gowalum 1 year ago
Wow is all I can say. =) Beautiful...
zeepman 2 years ago 2
Watching this because of the Tim Tebow and got a tear in my eye.
Thanks
tjexcite 2 years ago 2
Comment removed
hdbiker10940 2 years ago
On the date of my post, 1/22/10, we celebrate the victory of Protestant Scott Brown over Catholic Martha Coakley.
Coakley was seeking the seat of deceased senator Edward Kennedy. Both Coakley and Kennedy were powerful advocates of unlimited abortion rights, whereas the non-Catholic Brown has stated his belief in curbs to abortion rights, an example being the ban on partial-birth abortion.
Catholics continue to vote for and promote abortion, no matter what these videos say.
hdbiker10940 2 years ago
You're a fool. I know for a fact that Martha Coakley is not a Catholic. She said that Catholics should not work in hospitals because their religious views on abortion (which is being pro life). If anything she bashes Catholics as much as she can. I'm Catholic and every Catholic that I personally know is pro life.
Know your facts before you start spouting off on Youtube.
Surf4fun100 2 years ago
From the Martha Coakley biography dated september 3, 2009 and appearing in Western Massachusetts News:
"Coakley, a Catholic, said church and her parish were a big part of family life. She attended the St. Joseph's School in North Adams, and she transferred to Drury High School in North Adams for her senior year. She said that she graduated No. 10 in her class in 1971."
So take your stupid, lying Democrat ass to school and get an education in how to tell the truth.
hdbiker10940 2 years ago
I'm Conservative
Surf4fun100 2 years ago
Oh, really? Why do so many of you lie about yourselves?
So tell me, genius.....according to you what is the religious affiliation of Martha Coakley?
How about Vice President Biden? Nancy Pelosi? The deceased Senator Ted Kennedy? The other current Massachusetts senator, John Kerry?
Answer: ALL CATHOLICS, and ALL have dedicated their public lives to support the RIGHT of women to terminate their pregnancies whenever they want. And it's the Catholic VOTE that keeps them in office.
hdbiker10940 2 years ago
Wow dude you sound like such a great protestant.
Surf4fun100 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
How do you think you sound with "Wow dude"?
You still didn't answer about Martha Coakley's religion.
Questions getting too hard for you now?
You're the perfect Catholic....a lying ignoramus.
hdbiker10940 2 years ago
not all Catholics. Those you mention use the Catholic "name" for politics and blaspheme the catholic teachings. They are not truly Catholic if they approve or add to murder/abortion.
xukeith33 2 years ago 2
well said. And because they are so offtrack they are losing support and funds in droves i hear...
stephenjackson1 1 year ago
@xukeith33
You are right! The CCC states that those who give "formal cooperation" in abortion incurs excommunication latae sententiae". That's automatic excommunication. It does not require the act of a bishop, God does it. Formal Coop means those who perform it, & all who recommendsuggest it, politician& religious who support it and/or vote in favor of it".
Read CIC cannon law 1314, 1398, 1323-24. CCC #2272.
md3424 1 year ago
I'm not sure it matters whether we are catholic or not, as long as we are Christian and we serve the Lord, we are going to the same place. I'm protestant. Sounds like you are pro-life. I am too.
LovedbcHim 2 years ago
Agreed, finally someone that's not such a hater.
Surf4fun100 2 years ago
Thank you!
LovedbcHim 2 years ago
I would consider changing to Catholicism, but it is great you are a christian if you want to deepen your religion with the oldest most profound one available I suggest this but you are doing good anyway my friend god bless you!
stephenjackson1 1 year ago
Most research shows babies' hearts start beating at about 3 weeks. (21-25 days after fertilization)
Guadalupe1130 2 years ago
not every mother who's unfit to raise her kid can't afford to raise her kid, or rape or incest victim's child will make it to the moon. i don't think neal armstrong or buzz aldrin fell into those categories.
welcomegohome 2 years ago
Great! Live is very important! Thanks!
alabriga1966 2 years ago
fucking baby rapist!
1dread2dread 2 years ago
hotter fire burn down the vatican! them a babylon... wolf in sheep clothing. rastafari king of king lord of lords conquering lion in the tribe of judah elect of jah ever living jah earths rightful ruler! i man give thanks and praise while chalice, blaze weak heart conception, sellassie I correction, cramp and paralyze them and those that worship babylon! fire burn down the vatican. shit! the only reason catholics r against abortion is becaue they have lil kid fetishes
1dread2dread 2 years ago
Comment removed
Surf4fun100 2 years ago
w w w v a t i c a n c a t h o l i c -dot- c o m
cfh99nyc 2 years ago
@cfh99nyc The "Holy Family Monastery" is not a part of the Catholic Church. They are technically Protestant.
Geremia08 2 years ago
Wonderful video!
msamericangirl25 2 years ago 9
That's good because faith is a gift from God. It seems to me humakullen that the desire of your heart is for the greatest good. Continue to seek the truth and more will be revealed to you in time.
katherinewheaton 2 years ago 4
Well, I guess the subject of God is a different "can of worms" all together; especially since humans can't even agree on what it is. Is God an entity, life force, supra consciousness or simply more advanced beings who created us;-)? It's obviously beneficial to believe in "something" if it gives you meaning and purpose in life. However; since there has been over 4000 religious belief systems throughout history, claiming to give us "spiritual truths", I have my doubts.
humlakullen 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
What's the matter..? The tag-team of angelshoulders and katherinewheaton giving up already?
humlakullen 2 years ago
FACTS; Since we are "stuck" in a world of duality, death is just as natural as birth. Taking a piss or sh*t is just as natural as drinking or eating. You can't have one without the other. The only thing we can do is to strive for a balance in life. That includes matching the population density with the available resources. Your agenda and highest priority in life is to make sure every pregnancy comes to full term and results in a birth; after that you could care less.
humlakullen 2 years ago
Do you believe in God humlakullen ?
katherinewheaton 2 years ago 3
katherinewheaton, The God that gave man (AND WOMEN) free will? Definitely!
humlakullen 2 years ago
It's very weird and inconsistent how a PRO-LIFE believer value an unborn fetus more than a living child. IMAGINE if all their work and effort had gone to saving the more than twenty thousand children who die every day in hunger, malnutrition, malaria and lack of clean water. Why is it that every time a pro-lifer cites the "VALUE OF LIFE" they conveniently forget about the millions of childrens who suffer horribly every day.
Seems to me that someone has their priorities screwed up...
humlakullen 2 years ago
humalakullen please consider that all life is valuable to God.. all human life from the moment of conception until death even Louis Farrakan understands this.,but of course he excludes infidels
Things that make you go hmmm...
katherinewheaton 2 years ago 3
katherinewheaton, What "God" are you referring to? The one that doesn't seem to mind the twenty thousand children "mother nature" kills every day???
humlakullen 2 years ago
There are NOT too many people...there are too many SELFISH people!
jgcase 2 years ago 2
Awesome vid thanks for posting
kld1966 2 years ago
I could do the same thing with this video and substitute it with Hitler or Stalin. That being said, I am pro-choice.
angelshoulders: By saying that if you are "this," then you are "this" and "that" is very narrow minded and a logical fallacy.
Tricause 2 years ago
Awesome video!!<333 Thank you so much to the people of CatholicVote for posting your inspirational videos.:) I hope that they will inspire more pro choice Catholics to know that Jesus calls us all to be open to life. Keep the videos comin' people!!!:)
RepublicanGirl101 2 years ago
This is beautiful. That's all I have to say.
*claps*
The music makes me think of the Narnia movies....lol.
Bluecharizard550 2 years ago
I love these adds, truth when put in the light proves itself to be quite poetic
dmann16xs 2 years ago
Every abortion stops a beating heart-- or your money back!
itstolaugh 2 years ago
We don't have any problems with females heads of state, astronauts, fighter pilots and soldiers make life and death decisions. Why should there be any different when it comes to her own body and wellbeing? If people are so "GENUINLY" concerned about innocent childrens right to have a life worth living, then focus all your energy on making sure they have health care. Stop sex trade and child pornography. Fight to end abuse, neglect and hunger. Or is that to much work?
humlakullen 2 years ago
We also fight those things to, what are you doing to stop all those you listed? The Imagine spots is from a Catholic site, there are many Catholic org.,that help in those areas you listed.
rooforlife71 2 years ago
rooforlife71, WHAT I'M DOING? Food, clothes and money donations like most people. In college I even called the FBI on my own room mate because I suspected he was up to no good. He is now serving an 11year sentence in Colorado for child molestation (on his own daughter). I'm telling you, there are a lot of people out there who shouldn't even be allowed to have kids.
humlakullen 2 years ago
Yes thats true some people shouldnt be allowed to have kids but murdering the unborn is NOT the answer.
rooforlife71 2 years ago
rooforlife71, But killing and waging war against each other on the pretense of religion and God is justified? Sure, let's invite even more tragedy in our society by letting women with severe mental impairments give birth. Women serving life sentences on death row, being raped by their fathers or enemy soldiers. Drug addicts or psychopaths. It's very easy to invoke "God's rule" of life, if God actually had been responsible for the feeding, nurturing and effort it takes to have a functional life.
humlakullen 2 years ago
By that same thought,should we not also kill the poor,the depressed, the children starving in Africa,or anyone else who suffers?After all,in OUR estimation their lives are not worth living,it's just too painful for them.Oh,they disagree?Well, they just aren't smart enough to know what's good for them! so shut down the soup kitchens and the humanitarian aid! let us take up arms and seek the suffering of the world, that we may release them from their valueless lives in a hale of gunfire!
angelshoulders 2 years ago
If one were to open a 'Dog' Abortion mill where puppies were ripped from the mothers womb we would not be having this conversation because there would be a war in the USA over it. But since it is 'only' human life most people do not care. Remember Slavery used to be legal but nobody says it was right.
bobbybrady8 2 years ago 2
I love liberals who think an agregious violation of a woman's rights when she can't kill the life she created, but some goddamn lawyer in Washington should be able to tell me what to drive, what medical care I deserve, and who I have to hire!
pimpdalyrical 2 years ago
Pretending that every fetus is going to be the next president is like pretending that every fetus is going to be the next Hitler. Your argument is illogical.
Zikiru 2 years ago
Pretending a fetus is not a human being, thus enittled to the same rights you and I have, is what's illogical. The only way to PROVE any one child won't be a ground breaking president is to let it live long enough for us to find out.
pimpdalyrical 2 years ago
I never said anything about it not being a human being. By giving the fetus the right to occupy a woman's body against her will, you are taking away the womans rights. Going through a pregnancy is a great choice, but there is no reason that a woman must sacrifice so much from herself for the well being of the fetus. This isn't about whether or not it's a human. It's about whether or not women should have their rights taken away when they're pregnant, and the answer to that is NO.
Zikiru 2 years ago
You don't have the right to kill someone you invited into your home, and claim they were breaking in. A woman CHOOSES to risk having the responsibility of supporting a life inside her when she has sex. Her will and rights are a moot point when compared to the basic right to life. Nobody has the right to kill another human being just because they are dependent on them for survival. The basic right to life is more important than the temporary effects on the mother's body, which are her own fault.
pimpdalyrical 2 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
No, I am not inviting a fetus into my body when I have sex . If I became pregnant, it'd be against my will. Saying that a woman's rights are moot when she is pregnant just proves your misogynistic tendancies. No body should be forced to sacrifice their own body in order to help someone else. If people aren't donating blood, no one is going to strap you to a chair and force you to give blood so that another person can live. It may be the nice thing to do, but it'd be an infringement on our rights
Zikiru 2 years ago
It is not "against your will" if you get pregnant as a result of willingly taking that risk. It's just unintentional. Nobody intends to lose their money gambling either, but when you do, it's not theft when the casino collects.
No one is advocating the forced pregnancy of anyone else. If you want to be 100% baby free, there is one way to do that. Make your choice, take your risks. Dodging the responsibilities that come with your choices does not outweigh the right to life of another person!
pimpdalyrical 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Uh, so if I'm pregnant, and I don't want to go through the pregnancy but I have no choice but to.. Then it's not forced?
And no, it has nothing to do with your username. It has to do with your disregard for womens' experiences when it comes to pregnancy. I don't want control over other peoples' lives, that's what anti-choicers want. I want control over MY body and MY life, and if it might mean the death of a fetus, then so be it. If wanting control over my body is pathetic, then so be it.
Zikiru 2 years ago
All you pro-deathers really have accomplished is help irresponsible men get out of their own obligations and get away with infedelity. Even "Roe" doesn't buy into this crap that it's a feminist position anymore!
pimpdalyrical 2 years ago
The woman might attempt to deny this fact of nature, but nevertheless, the act of sex is allowing the possibility of pregnancy (even? if not intended), and that in itself, is giving the baby (another person), permission to use her body or organs. Since women are intelligent human beings (and thus realize this), if a new life should be created, she does not then have the right to kill that new, separate, living person.
angelshoulders 2 years ago
Is love an act of self-donation, or merely an act of self-assertion?
francesco1221 2 years ago
And, by the way, the effects a pregnancy has on a woman's body and life are absolutely not "temporary". I have a feeling that you're a male..
Zikiru 2 years ago
"I have a feeling that you're a male.. "
What gave it away, the "pimp" in my screen name?
I have a feeling you are terrified of ever having to practice the slightest restraint and self control with your ability to create life. Are you really so pathetic you need to have this feeling of God like control over someone's life and death?
pimpdalyrical 2 years ago
The permission for the baby to use the womans uterus is granted by the decision of the woman to have sex. As mammals and as human beings, the act of sex is designed to create new life. This is not to say that sex was meant to be used always as a means of procreation, but the possibility of creating a new life IS there every time we have sex.
She invited the baby into her womb.
angelshoulders 2 years ago
angelshoulders, I think we can all agree that abortion should never be used as another form of birth control. AND NO; Pro-Choice doesn't mean Pro-Abortion. However; there will always be cases where abortion would be the best outcome for everyone involved. If you were a fetus and somehow made aware that you were going to spend your life with severe mental and physical handicaps, just because your mother is a drug addict for example. Would you consider that life a gift full of possibilities?
humlakullen 2 years ago
Yes! I would!
sarahfwilson 2 years ago
sarahfwilson, I know a lot of people who wouldn't (including me).
But as a Pro-Choiser you have my support if you choose to keep a fetus like that.
humlakullen 2 years ago
"Human rights are not a privilege conferred by government. They are every human being's entitlement by virtue of his humanity. The right to life does not depend, and must not be declared to be contingent, on the pleasure of anyone else, not even a parent or a sovereign." ~Bl. Teresa of Calcutta
sarahfwilson 2 years ago 2
"The real question today is not when human life begins, but, 'What is the value of human life?' The abortionist who reassembles the arms and legs of a tiny baby to make sure all its parts have been torn from its mother's body can hardly doubt whether it is a human being." ~President Reagan, 1983
sarahfwilson 2 years ago 2
sarahfwilson, Hmm... Interesting. The worlds population increases by about 75 million people every year (mostly from under developed countries). Of those, 6 million children will die of hunger and malnutrition (16,000 per day). Malaria alone kills an additional 4000 people every day, and the list goes on. Why don't you ask "mother nature" or "God" about the "value" of their lives?
humlakullen 2 years ago
hum...and as a pro-deather, she also has the 'choice' to kill her baby too! Why do you defend the murder of babies anyway? Do you hate children, or women?
angelshoulders 2 years ago
So now you are twisting the truth, instead of attempting to answer my questions about the value of life? All the women in the world could come together tomorrow and decide that they will never have an abortion. As a Pro-Choiser, not only would I support that decision, but I would never even coerce women one way or another. Pro-lifers coerce women to give birth, citing the value of life, but then don't seem to have any problems with women in uniform killing innocent victims in war for example.
humlakullen 2 years ago
hum..you lack reason.There is no comparison to killing unborn precious,defenseless little babies & war.You say you are pro-choice,I beg to differ, you are pro-death.Why do you defend a mother's 'right' to kill her baby? You not only condone it, but here you are defending it!!
angelshoulders 2 years ago
You haven't even realised the inconsistencies and absurdities in your views (and never will) as long as you base your arguments on emotions, and contradictory religious dogma. There is a famous quote that says:
"Kill a few people and you are called a murderer, kill a few thousand and you are called a conqueror". U catch my drift...?
humlakullen 2 years ago
i could murder babies all day long.... (then i will eat them so they don't go to waste)
justinatorator 2 years ago
Spoken like a true pro-deather. Thanks for representing and letting us all know what pro-deathers think. They should all be very proud of you. At least you will admit what they do not!
angelshoulders 2 years ago
Women have the right to terminate anything growing within them, whether it's a tapeworm or a fetus. Neither you nor your government can nor should be able to decide for them.
justinatorator 2 years ago
I am guessing that you consider yourself a tapeworm then.
angelshoulders 2 years ago
I am guessing you consider yourself a fetus?
justinatorator 2 years ago
just...I was once a zygote,embryo,fetus,infant,child,adolescent and now I AM AN ADULT!! Unlike you
angelshoulders 2 years ago
I am only seventeen.
You are not a fetus.
You are (perhaps) a fully formed human.
Don't you know we have a population problem dude.
Seriously don't be a dick, vote for womens' rights.
justinatorator 2 years ago
When the world's human population was 6 billion, these could all have fitted into the State of Texas. Every person would have had some 1300 sq. feet of space, leaving the rest of the world completely EMPTY. I am not, of course, suggesting this is a viable proposition, but it illustrates my point - 'overpopulation' is a complete MYTH. Granted, the world population is expanding, but the RATE of expansion is rapidly declining. It will peak out at less than 9 billion long before the year 2050
angelshoulders 2 years ago
Overpopulation is NOT a myth by any means, just because we are able to fit inside of a given area with a certain amount of space says nothing about the amount of pollution and the rate of usage of resources that occur due to the population. The rate of expansion is not declining.
justinatorator 2 years ago
mother Earth is currently producing enough food to sustain 13 billion human inhabitants - and this on a mere fraction of the available rain-fed arable land. Ignore the trendy media spin-misers and concentrate instead on the FACTS. In the days of horse and cart, doomsayers were predicting that the streets of Manhattan would soon be '3 feet deep in horse manure', such was the rate of development. Then along came the motor car.Sound to me like "you don't like to share",we were taught young to share
angelshoulders 2 years ago
angelshoulders, I think you are a spin-miser who base your argument on feelings instead of facts, to further your own agenda. Where did the "13 billion" come from? What happens if/when we reach that? Is abortion going to be recommended then, or is another pro-lifer going to suggests mother earth can support 26 billion people? You conveniently forgot to mention all the chemical fertilizers, pesticides and growt hormones it takes to feed the current population. Twice the trash and pollution etc...
humlakullen 2 years ago
hum...Any excuse to kill a baby, huh??
angelshoulders 2 years ago
angelshoulders, Mother nature seem to think so!!!
humlakullen 2 years ago
hum...There is a big difference between a miscarraige or spontaneous abortion and the deliberate killing of an unborn living human being!! You may come up with all sorts of excuses to deliberately end life,but it is still just that,ending a human life!!
angelshoulders 2 years ago
angelshoulders, Why is an unborn fetus more "valuable" to pro-lifers than an infant or a child?
humlakullen 2 years ago
hum."...The abortion-rights folks know it, the anti-abortion folks know it, and so probably, does everyone else. One of the facts of abortion is that women enter abortion clinics to kill their fetuses. It is a form of killing ...you're ending a life." Ron Fitzsimmons, Executive Director, National Coalition of Abortion Providers, New York Times, 26 February 1997 Note the word 'probably'..obviously this is too complicated for you!
angelshoulders 2 years ago
angelshoulders, You still haven't answered my questions...
What's the matter; to COMPLICATED for you???
humlakullen 2 years ago
hum...You are sorely mistaken. What gives you the crazy idea that pro-lifers value an unborn child any more than a born child? We do not,we do expect respect for human life to hold true at every stage of developement.
angelshoulders 2 years ago
RESPECT!!! Is that your cop-out answer to all the suffering children who dies everyday of hunger, abuse, malnutrition and diseases???
humlakullen 2 years ago
hum.We do not have the right to decide for another person whether or not his life is worth living. such rationale still leads to the extreme . We euthanize animals because they do not make decisions for themselves, because they are lesser beings in our care. but human children are not lesser beings, and so the decision should be there's alone. granted, many do suffer abuse, but does common sense truly show that it is better to make a murderer's job easier?
angelshoulders 2 years ago
"thou shalt not kill" is just as much an imposition as being robbed at gunpoint. and if imposing our beliefs onto others is such a bad thing, why should we impose our beliefs onto an unborn child?Then I guess we shouldn't 'press' our 'beliefs' on the murderer or rapist....I WOULD NEVER MURDER OR RAPE, but it's not up to me to decide for others what they might want to do.....Right??? WRONG.
angelshoulders 2 years ago
hum.. Abortion is not a belief, it's the murder of a baby and the injury; emotional, physical and even sometimes spiritual, to the mother. Please DO NOT FORGET, MOST women do not want abortion...they are threatened with violence, abandonment and no support and 'forced with no CHOICEyou can't kill a child just to save your own skin. that's pretty self evident for those already born, but when we're talking about people we can't readily see without ultrasound, it's easy to rationalize
angelshoulders 2 years ago
hum...You can't do that without committing murder.. killing children to "protect" them from a life of hell necessarily implies that we should also kill everyone else in the world who is ALREADY living a life of hell. if you are so eager to kill unwanted babies out of misplaced compassion, why are you not also eager to kill the masses of starved and diseased people in the world? isn't killing them a necessary evil? see the contradiction? it's very important
angelshoulders 2 years ago
By that same thought,should we not also kill the poor,the depressed, the children starving in Africa,or anyone else who suffers?After all,in OUR estimation their lives are not worth living,it's just too painful for them.Oh,they disagree?Well, they just aren't smart enough to know what's good for them! so shut down the soup kitchens and the humanitarian aid! let us take up arms and seek the suffering of the world, that we may release them from their valueless lives in a hale of gunfire!
angelshoulders 2 years ago
hum..How about the starving or those with lousy personal lives or the depressed while they suffer (for now at any rate), does this mean that their lives our valueless? Should they not be the ones to decide that?do you not support law enforcement or prisons for hardened criminals? if you do, are these not the most blatant forms of pressing your beliefs onto others? you will find that to have any moral code at all involves imposing your beliefs onto others
angelshoulders 2 years ago
angelshoulders, Let me know when you are done with all that emotional rambling and actually start using logic and facts to answer my previous questions.
How come you value a fetus more than a living child?
Mother nature does it's best of controlling overpopulation, but you claim earth can support 13 billion (then what?).
Why is abortion "murder" but the death of children due to neglect and lack of resources OK?
humlakullen 2 years ago
hum..no one here said that the death of children due to neglect or lack of resources was OK. Certainly I did not say that. But then you have changed the subject. We were talking about the killing on unborn children.
angelshoulders 2 years ago
angelshoulders, Here we go again... You can't answer those questions, can you?
humlakullen 2 years ago
hum..You are pro-death,you not only condone it,you support&defend abortion.You even encourage a mother hiring a hit man to forcibly enter her womb with the sole intention of dismembering,tearing,ripping her little baby into pieces.Then with his cold,hard tools of his trade,suctioning out the tiny body parts into a stainless steel colander to be reassembled.FOR MONEY!When you say pro-choice,you are pro-death.
angelshoulders 2 years ago
Hahaha.... If you focused all that "passion" and energy on saving the thousands of suffering children, it would be a better world already (since you are so concerned about life;-). Even better, why don't you take that pro-life crusade to China, and tell them to stop all their abortions and lift their ban on "one child per family". I'm sure the world would be a happier place with 2 billion Chinese instead of just 1billion;-).
humlakullen 2 years ago
hum..I do notice that you are pointing fingers,and you have your own pointing back at you. What exactly is it that makes you so defensive? Are you putting your efforts and passoin regarding the support, defense and encouragement of killing babies to any other use? Best be careful when you spend the same amount of time trying to get mothers to kill their babies.Instead of doing your cause you think everyone else should be doing.The problem w/that is called govt.,even if we tried,failure is due.
angelshoulders 2 years ago
hum...we would all like to see all the injustices of the world disappear,but unfortunately,evil in govt. persists & blocks the best efforts of us all.Just like in the case of abortion.We all know killing babies is wrong,but have a difficult time changing anything.We live among selfishness, greed, uncaring hard cold ppl. So long as this is around,we have our hands tied.Have you tried to help? I found my money going for everything and everyone but who I intended it for. Sad & a true shame.For now.
angelshoulders 2 years ago
The only finger I'm pointing is at the flaws, contradictions and inconsistencies in your cause. especially when you compare it to all other travesties and suffering that goes on in the world. As a pro-choicer I don't have any cause or agenda to defend, since a woman can decide to give birth (instead of abortion) and I will support that as well. Problem solving debates, based on logic and objectivity always wins over feelings and emotions.
humlakullen 2 years ago
hum..So basically you are saying that a mother killing her infant is okie dokie,peachy keen and you are the cheerleader beside her gurney wipping the sweat off the forehead of the abortionist. WOW. I can only feel sorrow for you. You have no morals, values and human life is nothing to you.
angelshoulders 2 years ago
angelshoulders, SO YOU FEEL SORRY FOR ME, but not the millions of children who die every year in neglect, abuse, starvation, malnutrition and so severely mentally and physically handicapped due to a mothers drug-use and alcoholism??? Interesting....
humlakullen 2 years ago
hum..I have already explained my position on this.Why do you insist in turning this conversation into a redundant circus?I have little children who can carry a better conversation than this,at least they remember what has been said. You throw red herrings out there all over the place. It does not change a thing.If you want to stay on the topic at hand,let me know.
angelshoulders 2 years ago
angelshoulders, Right back at ya...;-)!
humlakullen 2 years ago
hum...again. You have to show me where any pro-lifer has ever said that the unborn baby is more valuable then the born baby. The burden of proof is on you. You are the one's making all these claims.You are putting horrible words in our mouths.You answer the questions.You are the accuser!!!
angelshoulders 2 years ago
hum...You ask me what then...I say it is very easy to see wrong, like slavery, and not have all the answers.That does not mean slavery is not a problem,it means I have no immediate solution to the problem.Again I ask you and you do not answer. Who said death of children due to neglect & lack of resources is OK! You accuse me, yet you cannot show me where I or any pro-lifer has ever said that!!
angelshoulders 2 years ago
hum..And take the easy way out when in a tight spot, even, as in this case, if it kills somebody The point you have been conveying is that, if a child is likely to undergo pain and suffering in his life, he should be exterminated for his own good before he is born. or, if a girl is going to suffer for her pregnancy, she should exterminate her child before he is born. the whole point of this argument has been to show that, whatever the circumstances surrounding a human's conception
angelshoulders 2 years ago
The other point I would now like to make is that mother Earth is currently producing enough food to sustain 13 billion human inhabitants - and this on a mere fraction of the available rain-fed arable land. Ignore the trendy media spin-misers and concentrate instead on the FACTS. In the days of horse and cart, doomsayers were predicting that the streets of Manhattan would soon be '3 feet deep in horse manure', such was the rate of development. Then along came the motor car.
angelshoulders 2 years ago
They never seem to link their Malthusian perspective with their support of abortion "rights."Quotas on the # of children per family seem tyrannical.Its better to glorify"abortion rights" &get the people worried about overpopulation.Better to distribute the kool-aid.Can you not see that if euthanasia becomes 'voluntary', this is only one step away from when it is made COMPULSORY. Once we embark upon that slippery slope, where will it all end?
angelshoulders 2 years ago
It almost seems as though you believe that children should die so you&the others on this earth can have a more comfortable life
angelshoulders 2 years ago
Pro-lifers aren't telling women what they must do with their body. They are telling women what they can't do to a fetus When I hear this idiotic "woman's body" argument, it's a bit like hearing a landlord saying he has a right to kill tenants, because they're living in his house. There is pure demonic evil in that argument.
angelshoulders 2 years ago 2
That is a straw man. To compare a house to a womans body when she is impregnated falls a little bit short of a true comparison due to the fact that the house isn't terminating the residents, and all of these residents are fully developed.
Pro-lifers have no right to tell a woman what to do with a fetus when it is growing inside of her.
justinatorator 2 years ago
just...Understand this.You get laid in order to procreate.Now I understand their adolescent minds do not fathom the fact that yearning for sex is evolutions way of insuring procreation.However,may their mind ingest this.The end result of unfettered abortion &your get a life and get laid attitude will be the extinction of the human species. This is precisely why abortion must be fettered.One can only imagine this conversation if your mother bore your same attitude toward (your)life and abortion
angelshoulders 2 years ago
Although pleasure is a way of ensuring procreation, humans use condoms and birth control to stop from getting impregnated. Until i wish to have children i get laid to fulfill my sexual urges.
Actually my mother had an abortion earlier in her life when it would be detrimental to her progress and ability to provide and give a good life to the child. then she had me. We are not going extinct (that is unless we let the population get uncontrollable).
justinatorator 2 years ago
just...How sad that she could not see past her own needs to carry your sibling to term.That explains alot..
angelshoulders 2 years ago
I would say her own needs are more important than an unborn fetus. you appearantly haven't had children have you?
justinatorator 2 years ago
Pro-choice is pro-abortion is pro-death. If you condone,support&defend a mother's 'choice' to kill the baby she helped to create, you are pro-abortion.If I were to be born with mental & physical handicaps,I would rather have life than death! I want to live. Life is beautiful & worth some sacrifice, more sweet then sour!
angelshoulders 2 years ago
ANGELSHOULDERS!!! AMEN!!!!
kld1966 2 years ago
I pray all the time for those little ones who are murdered by arrogant parents and by the hands of the murdering doctors... May god give full wrath on those who kill the innocent ones.
BrainScanMedia 2 years ago
bycot CNN+NBC...not to mention the writers who are ocd over abrtin/sterilizing women in DOOLs (which ruined that soap for me!)...there was a petition against that stupid new politically biased DOOL writer! i think i had signed it years ago...he hates women...he covers it up by showing his hate for prebrn kids.
ClearAki 2 years ago
Comment removed
johnmcclen 2 years ago
thank you very much for this video.
ic621 2 years ago
Great work, and really REALLY IMPORTANT !!! WAKE UP; people ! Do not abort your future !!!
Freedaaa 2 years ago
Beautiful!!!
spacecase7000 2 years ago 2
Awesome video - great comment ClubALib1.
florasharon 2 years ago 3
I don't get it. The Catholic Church condemns abortion, but does nothing to the politicians who vote for it. Pelosi, Kennedy, Biden, Kerry and Sebelius (all huge Catholics) support RADICAL abortion agendas, but yet are still part of the Church.
So until the Church takes action against those who enable abortion (i.e., excommunication), these videos are a giant waste of time.
It's like the Muslims who say Islam is peaceful, but then fail to condemn terrorism. What's the difference?
AA32m7io1 2 years ago
People like Pelosi can call themselves Catholic all they want. At the end of the day, however, she is no Catholic. Time to start calling them what they are - Catholics In Name Only, or CINOs.
perezDeSanFernando 2 years ago 2
That might be the case. But until the Catholic Church does anything to distance themsleves from these politicians who support abortion (and gay rights), then there is really no difference in my mind. Why does the Catholic Church still allow them to take communion?
AA32m7io1 2 years ago
call them FCs (Fake Christians/Catholics)
Pope had said that(some) Christians/Catholics are fakes, but i don't know exactly wat he had said.I think he was talkin bout the fakes who claim they are religious when they are actually evil bby-mrdrers who don't act religious. No, i'm not Catholic + i don't know the Bible texts. I'm an independent thinkr who is peaceful +has very prlife views(but if 'redrum' wasn't evil/illgal, i wouldn't be living +neither would nonbelievers against RightToLife).
ClearAki 2 years ago
We should save every baby because, who knows, they might all learn to crawl on the moon one day -____-
GrayFox15 2 years ago 4
and/or force fda to reveal the secrets of cures for fatal illnesses or/and find them if they haven't been found.
signed,
a nonCatholic (a Christian/Buddhist/other religionious ideas mix) that is 1000% for life
ClearAki 2 years ago
Loved it! Very well done.
heatherbear8 2 years ago 4
Wonderful! Thank you for standing up for life. This is a very powerful ad, great job!!
RenokerQ 2 years ago 3
This has been flagged as spam show
a must see video:)
kahamili 2 years ago
Wonderful.
Inspiring.
God help us value the children...
ChooseCarefully 2 years ago 3
The truth that the pro-death people cannot stand. Liberalism is a mental disorder.
heniek67 2 years ago 2
amen!
JoshMayProductions 2 years ago 3
they cannot stand...the truth...the truth scares them! their fear of caring about the noisy youth is irrational. I have siblings to put up with, so noisy (and dirty diapers when they were little was)is something i put up with on and off. Don't like/want bbies? get your tubes tied, LIB.S! WE DON'T NEED ABRTION! WE NEED THE EVIL CHILD-HATERS TO TIE THEIR TUBES! same goes for communist sxist men in China!
ClearAki 2 years ago
Great video. Thanks for adding it.
JCassian 2 years ago
Thank you for these beautiful commercials. The music fits wonderfully!
minimidgy 2 years ago
You got it!
Great Job
vivacristorey2009 2 years ago
Wow...powerful.
r4c3rx 2 years ago
The heart beats start at 3 weeks!
rooforlife71 2 years ago 2
Do you have any articles on this? I would love to use them as references! :) Thank you.
littlebutterflii 2 years ago 3
Well done!!
prolifesocietyvideo 2 years ago
Another excellent commercial - the only one who stands between a child and his or her potential is it'smother.....[not her circumstances as one of your other commercials pointed out]
I love these commericals keep them coming!!!
chinisup 2 years ago
Fantastic! Congratulations from Spain, where we fight for de Life Right.
CristinaCV 2 years ago 4
Thank you for this beautiful ad. It's too bad we've gotten to where we even have to sell the idea of life to Catholics.
64eugenia 2 years ago 4
Shocking, isn't it. I'm baffled that people will call themselves Catholic and absolve themselves by saying that supporting less deaths is better than supporting NO deaths.
jackzepplin 2 years ago 5
This is beautifully executed (no pun intended)!
Does ANYONE know the name of the music they used in this?!?! It's amazing!
EngorgedxSpleen 2 years ago
Beautiful, every human being has the potential of leaving a positive footprint in history.
hairandart 2 years ago 2
I'm not sure what Moon landings have to do with babies.
Pretty music.
jcomden 2 years ago
Comment removed
kittycat3376 2 years ago
If you can't figure out how a baby taking it's first steps at 80 wks relates to Neil Armstrong taking the first steps on the moon at 2024 weeks, then you really should refrain from handling sharp objects and stay away from cliff edges.
Hint: ABORTION KILLS HUMANS before they can accomplish ANYTHING. Even that first step!
ClubALib1 2 years ago 8
beautiful.
what would life be without that footprint on the moon.
without "one small step for a man, one giant leap for mankind".
memymomalex 2 years ago 2
LOVE THIS!! THANK YOU!
fernandez3801 2 years ago
Boom!
michaeljtowle 2 years ago