Did anyone know that Obama (as an Illinois senator) was the sole supporter of legislation that would prevent doctors from medically treating a botched abortion. He believes that they should just finish the job, even though the baby is out of the womb and is alive. If libs think that's OK, then so be it but let them do it in their own Democrat states. They should not force every state to adopt their system of beliefs through the courts.
SHOdriver1992 & pwf2412...I am pro life, but I also believe that it should be decided by each state (federalism), for a reason. You will never be able to pass pro life laws nationally, unfortunately. Most states are conservative, and as it sits the few liberal states determine the laws for every other state. I believe the only way to make any progress is to let the states make their own laws, because liberal states will always force their agenda on the rest of us. I hate liberalism.
I just read an article where a guy was arrested in Louisianna for having the "Don't Tread On Me" bumper sticker on his car. Homeland Security did a background check to determine if he was a security threat. For real, I kid you not. Liberals are not about free speech at all. Well, yes they are.....as long as it's liberal speech. Obama and the libs are using Homeland Security to silence conservatives instead of for it's proper use to protect against terrorists. We just got started, too.
That is why "Uncle" Napolitano put all returning veterans and right wing conservatives on the "suspect" list. Instead of Obama's old friends, which are actual terrorists.
They have to have you on "the list" in order to run those federal checks. That is just the way it works.
WOW! Ok so you say you're pro-life right? Yet you probably support bombs being dropped on Iraqi children right? Are you pro-war? If you say yes DO NOT SAY YOU'RE PRO-LIFE! For my last comment, Ron Paul is not "evil". What do you think makes up the FEDERAL government? all the states. We all have our own sovereignty in the state we live in. Well my state does at least. Now please don't message me again SHO. The video was funny too hahahahahahahahaha.
No, I would never support bombs being dropped on Iraqi children. Yes, I'm pro-war. So was Christ. So what? Yes, anyone who says anyone can kill the unborn, as Ron Paul says each state has the right to do, is evil. Read the 5th and 14th amendments and then try to tell me abortion should be left up to the states.
I think Obama will be worst than little George so just watch and wait. A year from now everyone will dislike the guy. They will finally see that Dems. and Repubs. are one giant force with the same agenda's. Well not Ron Paul I like that guys honesty, he tells you as he see's it because he knows we people are smarter than we all look. Well some of us atleast try to be educated so hats off to you who try. Never liked Republicans until I saw his debates. google him =)
Interesting. You say people are smarter than we all look yet you place apostrophes where the don't belong and you don't place them where they do belong. By the way, Ron Paul is evil. He believes abortion should be left up to the discretion of each state.
While I don't agree with abortion, and I think it is wrong. Saying that someone is evil just because he doesn't agree with you seems silly. there are other words to use than Evil for describing people or things you disagree with. that was my point. I have a copy of the constitution right here.. and have read it plenty of times... your lack of ability to articulate your thoughts is what I was commenting on.
Not everyone who doesn't agree with me is evil, only those who believe states have the right to kill unborn children. So, if you have the constitution right there, and assuming you have the ability to understand it, what do the 5th and 14th amendments have to say about killing the innocent, which includes the unborn?
There is no need for me to recite what is known.... You failed to notice that I agreed with you on abortion. You also failed to notice that my comments are based on you classifying someone with a different opinion "evil" since you can't seem to stay on track here i will pay attention to others that do. I am done.
You were done before you started. You actually don't agree with me about abortion because you don't agree that people who are pro-choice state-by-state are evil. It's not that he has a different opinion than mine that makes him evil, it's the fact that he's pro-choice state-by-state that makes him evil. Get it yet?
but you won't change it unless you elect enough people willing to move the country right. you guarantee that millions of babies will continue to be murdered each year. remember movement in the right direction a step at a time is better than a shift to the left, while idiots like you wait for some magic politician to give you everything you want overnight. sleep well knowing that because you help elect dems, babies continue to die
I'm wondering how you're going to answer your Creator one day when He asks you why you were willing to compromise on His enduring command, "Thou shalt not murder." Read the sixth commandment sometime. It says, "Thou shalt not murder." It does not say, "Thou shalt not murder unless..."
I believe that Jesus is the Christ , the Son of the Living God, and I have accepted him as my lord and my Savior, I just wonder how you will answer to Christ when you tell him that because you couldn't have everything ypu believed in and wanted all at once, you allowed people who destroyed life to take control and kill millions of babies. Who is the bigger hypocrite here the one who tries to save one life and suffers when others die or the one who saves NO lives and allows all to die
Ok, here's a question for you and you only have to answer with one word. There's a law that says if a woman views an ultrasound of her unborn child, then she can kill her baby. pwf2412, is that law righteous or evil?
I have already said abortion is wrong, try paying attention.
I believe that Jesus is happier with the person who fights and changes the law so that Abortions become illeagle in most states, so that instead of 1 million abortions a year ther are only 500,000 abortions a year, instead of with the person who says abortion is evil but because they can't get gid of it everywhere they don't get rid of it anywhere.
I save half of the babies and you save none, who cares more?
The fact you believe abortion is wrong makes your position even more egregious if you believe it should be left up to each state to decide. Would you have the same position if a state decided they wanted to bring slavery back? There has never been one abortion law that has had the authority to save even one baby. Every one of them effectively says " Do this or do that and then you can kill the baby." I see you dodged my question. Is a law like that righteous or evil? Please answer.
If you would bother to pay attention, I said it should be a state matter because it would be easier to defeat on a state level. I want the states to have control so we can make it illeagle easier. at a federal level, it is almost impossible to change, but at a state level the number of places abortions were available would drop to over half of the current places. which would mean a sharp drop in the total number of abortions
which is what you claim to want, yet, because you can't stop them all at once, you don't want to stop any. in effect, you support abortion and the destruction of millions of innocent children is firmly on your shoulders.
And just so you will shut up about your stupid question, the law is neither evil nor good, the act of abortion is evil.
The fact that some states have passed a law requiring women to see the baby before an abortion is overall a good thing, .....
if seeinf the baby changes the mind of even one woman and causes her not to have the abortion, then it was worth it.
Again you look at it from the point that because most women go ahead with the abortion, a decision they had already made, then the law is somehow evil, Christ must surely weep that you don't rejoice in the fact that even one child is saved.
Plus, I live in Colorado. We had over 580,000 people vote for Amendment 48, our personhood amendment. I personally went out and solicited signatures for the petition to get it on the ballot and we received over 131,000 signatures, way more than we needed. We are now using that as a springboard for many more pro-life efforts. What are you personally doing in your state for the pro-life effort?
I voulnteer at a local Christian womans facility to help them with their pregnancies and help with adoptions and with raising their children. I volunteer with local politicians who are pro life. Please don't try and pretend that I don't do what I can.
I did answer your question. I said the state-by-state position is evil. You aren't pro-life, you're pro-choice state-by-state. You're no different than someone who says they are personally against abortion but believe in a woman's right to choose. You're position says, "I'm pro-life but I believe in a state's right to choose." pwf2412, you, in fact, are PRO-CHOICE! Now, answer my question! Is a law that says, "...and then you can kill the baby" righteous or evil?
"I want the states to have control so we can make it illeagle easier. at a federal level, it is almost impossible to change, but at a state level the number of places abortions were available would drop to over half of the current places. which would mean a sharp drop in the total number of abortions"
So, pwf2412, if a state legislator walked up to you and said, "Hey, I'm going to propose a law that says if a woman views an ultrasound, then she can KILL HER BABY," you would answer, "Hey, I'm good with that."? So on one hand you say you are pro-life, and on the other hand you are actually pro-choice ultrasound-by-ultrasound. You have interpreted the 6th commandment to say, "Thou shalt not murder unless you view an ultrasound." You can't see how wicked that is? You need to repent, pwf2412.
you are an idiot, are you trying to tell me that the intent of the law was just so the woman could see the baby she was killing? No!! the intent is such that a woman would be forced to see the baby as the child it is and to help REDUCE the number of abortions. LIKE I ALREADY said, if even one woman changes her mind because of what she sees than the law was and is a good thing.
Are you trying to say that a woman is more likely to change her mind if she DOESN'T see the baby.
You say each state has the CHOICE to make killing unborn children legal if they CHOOSE to. You believe a woman has the CHOICE to kill her baby if she views an ultrasound first and then CHOOSES to kill it. You believe a minor girl's parents have the CHOICE to allow her to kill her baby if she tells them first and they CHOOSE to allow her to have an abortion. pwf2412, you are pro-choice whether you want to admit it or not. I'm 100% pro-life. You're something less than 100% pro-life.
show me where I said any of that? quit being an idiot and actua;;y show me where I said any of that. you are using the same liberal tactics the rest of your friends use and putting words in my mouth I never said.
You are a liar. I said it should be a state choice BECAUSE then it would be easier to make abortions illeagle. I never even said any of the rest.
You believe abortion should be left up to each state so that means you are pro-choice state-by-state. You don't have to say the actual words for others to know what you mean by your stand on an issue.
You cannot say how many babies would ever be saved with you efforts, but I can definitively say ALL abortions would end when the personhood of the unborn child is established. Just like slavery was ended when the personhood of the black person was established. Let me ask you this, did William Wilberforce compromise on slavery or did he settle for nothing less than the elimination of slavery?
Do you somehow believe that I don't support a federal change? Really, That is what you believe? you are even more of an Idiot than I already know you to be.
Unlike you I also fight for what ever victory I can get. If I can get the State of Indiana to ban all abortions or even some abortions. I count that as a victory.
If I can help get a law passed that requires to have an ultra sound and see her baby. and that ultra sound changes the mind of one woman. THAT IS A VICTORY.
if that is where he goes you will be the one to meet him. you are a liar and your insistance on all or nothing will continue to allow millions of children to be murdered. I am done with you. I would ask that everyone here just ignore this idiot. hopefuly without anyone to "play" with this moron will go away.
SHOdriver1992 needs to understand that there are more important issues than abortion. Yes abortion is wrong but it shouldn't be the only thing we should care about. I agree with you on the Federal part, were you said it would be easier to fight at a state level. If this is all women care about than god help us all. Take care.
People who pick at grammatical errors instead of debating ideas have nothing worthwhile to say. How does Paul's stance on abortion make him "evil" in any way other than he supports it's existence? If that is the case, then Pin Stripe is the most evil since he is in favor of the federal government supporting and providing abortions.
People who pick at people who pick at grammatical errors of others should mind their own business. By the way, I did debate an idea, the idea that Ron Paul is a good candidate. Anyone who is in favor of the federal government supporting and providing abortions is evil and anyone in favor of states supporting and providing abortions is evil as well.
You didn't debate anything. However the lib's got where they are through incrementalism. The sad truth is that most of the public is numb toward the subject of abortion so it's not going to be eliminated soon. However, if it's legality were to be returned to the states where it belongs, we could use incrementalism to attack it state-by-state.
If Obama decides to sign FOCA, 35 years of incrementalism will vanish instantly. The reason is because incrementalism is built on the sand of compromise while uncompromise is built on the rock of conviction. Establishing personhood of the unborn from the moment of creation is the only rock that will end abortion abortion once and for all in this country exactly the same way establishing personhood of black people ended slavery in this country once and for all.
abortion is evil, but it should be a state right. the fact that the courts took it from the states is what makes abortions so plentiful. abortion would be easier to fight on a state level, than on a federal level
you are one of those idiots destroying the conservative movement. instead of voting for the republican whio can move the party and the country in the right direction, you vote for some idiot 3rd party schmuck who doesn't stand a chance at winning, because the candidate who could win, doesn't agree a 100% with your issues. The truth is the dems didn't get the power they have now all at once, they got it a little at a time, but morons like you are the ones keeping the repubs from doing the same
Which Republican was I supposed to vote for who could have moved the party and the country in the right direction? Don't say John McCain unless you want to show what an ignoramus you are in public.
John McCain, would have been a step in the right direction over BHO, but no, you couldn't do that so you voted for a candidate that stood absolutly no chance of winning, thereby giving the country and the lives of millions of unborn babies into the hands of the radical left. Do you think BHO will nominate any conservative judges to the bench? What about McCain? Much better chance with McCain. but you stood on principal and now more babies will die
Was GW pro-life? No. Is John McCain pro-life? No. I'm only interested in pro-life candidates. Conservative judges? Ha! What a joke. In case you weren't aware, all six judges that voted to kill Terry Schiavo were Republican, so-called conservative judges. They were all nominated by GHW Bush, Ronald Reagan, and GW Bush. With judges like that, who needs enemies? Plus, out of all the so-called conservative Supreme Court judges, name me one who is pro-life. I'll make it easy on you. There isn't one.
nice! Auto makers want more money? How about going out and raising it like GE did?! Ruins the price of the stocks, but at least you'll have some money
I told my "tween" daughter that I thought he'd be a good choice to play Little Joe in a remake movie of "Bonanza". She replied with "What's a 'Bonanza'?"
At least the anti-war protestors are still showing up with Obama in office. I remember the marches on the White House and the compounds outside Bill Clinton's Arkansas home when he sent troops to Bosnia, Mogadishu, and bombed Iraq. Oh, wait. That never happened.
I used to like Mellencamp until all of his songs tried to tell me how to think. John, we don't care if you're a lib, we just don't want to hear about it in every song.
Did anyone know that Obama (as an Illinois senator) was the sole supporter of legislation that would prevent doctors from medically treating a botched abortion. He believes that they should just finish the job, even though the baby is out of the womb and is alive. If libs think that's OK, then so be it but let them do it in their own Democrat states. They should not force every state to adopt their system of beliefs through the courts.
kong060667 2 years ago 3
SHOdriver1992 & pwf2412...I am pro life, but I also believe that it should be decided by each state (federalism), for a reason. You will never be able to pass pro life laws nationally, unfortunately. Most states are conservative, and as it sits the few liberal states determine the laws for every other state. I believe the only way to make any progress is to let the states make their own laws, because liberal states will always force their agenda on the rest of us. I hate liberalism.
kong060667 2 years ago
Kong,
Your right. The same with gay marriage.
And let the people choose whether to live in that state or not.
Oh ya, and let those states pay for those decissions also.
DD826 2 years ago
I just read an article where a guy was arrested in Louisianna for having the "Don't Tread On Me" bumper sticker on his car. Homeland Security did a background check to determine if he was a security threat. For real, I kid you not. Liberals are not about free speech at all. Well, yes they are.....as long as it's liberal speech. Obama and the libs are using Homeland Security to silence conservatives instead of for it's proper use to protect against terrorists. We just got started, too.
kong060667 2 years ago
kong,
That is why "Uncle" Napolitano put all returning veterans and right wing conservatives on the "suspect" list. Instead of Obama's old friends, which are actual terrorists.
They have to have you on "the list" in order to run those federal checks. That is just the way it works.
Your right on all counts.
DD826 2 years ago
This government will hunt an "alleged" biological father to the end of the earth, take his wages and jail him.
But a woman, can have her kid killed or dump it at the fire station, and accept no responsibility.
lol
DD826 2 years ago 7
Pithy and a pity but you say it well.
hdecre55 2 years ago
hdecre55,
Thanks for the compliment.
I had to look up the word "pithy".
Also, thanks for the new word.
DD826 2 years ago
Just ask a chick how she feels after an abortion.
Only hard ass shit for brains cunts will say "ok"
HarcourtMarketing 2 years ago
harcourt- do you wear a condom EVERY time you fuck?
laceydays 2 years ago
WOW! Ok so you say you're pro-life right? Yet you probably support bombs being dropped on Iraqi children right? Are you pro-war? If you say yes DO NOT SAY YOU'RE PRO-LIFE! For my last comment, Ron Paul is not "evil". What do you think makes up the FEDERAL government? all the states. We all have our own sovereignty in the state we live in. Well my state does at least. Now please don't message me again SHO. The video was funny too hahahahahahahahaha.
RandomlyExplicit 2 years ago
No, I would never support bombs being dropped on Iraqi children. Yes, I'm pro-war. So was Christ. So what? Yes, anyone who says anyone can kill the unborn, as Ron Paul says each state has the right to do, is evil. Read the 5th and 14th amendments and then try to tell me abortion should be left up to the states.
SHOdriver1992 2 years ago
Sure it was the Sun that is going to destroy the Electrical Grids or was that Chinese or Russian hackers?
mykol13v 2 years ago
that was hilarious.
JollyMunkie 2 years ago
Maybe I enjoy mocking conservatives and their inability to be funny
DoomCenturion 2 years ago
you have fun hobbies! Go you!
hecker1982 2 years ago
Like eight years of Bush-bashing isn't old?
TMorrowAZ 2 years ago 2
Then you should leave until Newsbusted ceases to be funny. Until then, you have nothing to mock.
jtkirkfan2002 2 years ago
I mean god damn they use the same canned laugh track for every god awful joke
DoomCenturion 2 years ago
Yeah, I guess we should all be listening to John Stewart because he has a bigger budget and can afford the ocean fresh laugh tracks.
As for me, the laugh tracks mean little, when compared to the wonderfully biting sarcastic humor that for once isn't only directed at Conservatives.
nflandas 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
The laugh tracks mean that the jokes aren't funny
At least stewart has a live audience
DoomCenturion 2 years ago
no the laugh track is part of the joke,
pwf2412 2 years ago 2
another newbie
pwf2412 2 years ago
was this supposed to be funny because god damn newsbusters is shit
DoomCenturion 2 years ago
5 Stars!! John Mellonhead is a complete douche!
flyboymd82 2 years ago
I think Obama will be worst than little George so just watch and wait. A year from now everyone will dislike the guy. They will finally see that Dems. and Repubs. are one giant force with the same agenda's. Well not Ron Paul I like that guys honesty, he tells you as he see's it because he knows we people are smarter than we all look. Well some of us atleast try to be educated so hats off to you who try. Never liked Republicans until I saw his debates. google him =)
RandomlyExplicit 2 years ago
Interesting. You say people are smarter than we all look yet you place apostrophes where the don't belong and you don't place them where they do belong. By the way, Ron Paul is evil. He believes abortion should be left up to the discretion of each state.
SHOdriver1992 2 years ago
how does " He believes abortion should be left up to the discretion of each state. " qualify as being evil? you need to learn some knew vocabulary..
bmkarma 2 years ago
Because murdering the unborn should be illegal nationwide. You need to learn the constitution, especially the 5th and 14th amendments.
SHOdriver1992 2 years ago
While I don't agree with abortion, and I think it is wrong. Saying that someone is evil just because he doesn't agree with you seems silly. there are other words to use than Evil for describing people or things you disagree with. that was my point. I have a copy of the constitution right here.. and have read it plenty of times... your lack of ability to articulate your thoughts is what I was commenting on.
bmkarma 2 years ago
Not everyone who doesn't agree with me is evil, only those who believe states have the right to kill unborn children. So, if you have the constitution right there, and assuming you have the ability to understand it, what do the 5th and 14th amendments have to say about killing the innocent, which includes the unborn?
SHOdriver1992 2 years ago
There is no need for me to recite what is known.... You failed to notice that I agreed with you on abortion. You also failed to notice that my comments are based on you classifying someone with a different opinion "evil" since you can't seem to stay on track here i will pay attention to others that do. I am done.
bmkarma 2 years ago
You were done before you started. You actually don't agree with me about abortion because you don't agree that people who are pro-choice state-by-state are evil. It's not that he has a different opinion than mine that makes him evil, it's the fact that he's pro-choice state-by-state that makes him evil. Get it yet?
SHOdriver1992 2 years ago
Single issue mentality is what got Obama elected and will continue to keep the liberals in power.
jtkirkfan2002 2 years ago
Murdering the unborn is unacceptable no matter who's in power.
SHOdriver1992 2 years ago
but you won't change it unless you elect enough people willing to move the country right. you guarantee that millions of babies will continue to be murdered each year. remember movement in the right direction a step at a time is better than a shift to the left, while idiots like you wait for some magic politician to give you everything you want overnight. sleep well knowing that because you help elect dems, babies continue to die
pwf2412 2 years ago
I'm wondering how you're going to answer your Creator one day when He asks you why you were willing to compromise on His enduring command, "Thou shalt not murder." Read the sixth commandment sometime. It says, "Thou shalt not murder." It does not say, "Thou shalt not murder unless..."
SHOdriver1992 2 years ago
I believe that Jesus is the Christ , the Son of the Living God, and I have accepted him as my lord and my Savior, I just wonder how you will answer to Christ when you tell him that because you couldn't have everything ypu believed in and wanted all at once, you allowed people who destroyed life to take control and kill millions of babies. Who is the bigger hypocrite here the one who tries to save one life and suffers when others die or the one who saves NO lives and allows all to die
pwf2412 2 years ago 3
Ok, here's a question for you and you only have to answer with one word. There's a law that says if a woman views an ultrasound of her unborn child, then she can kill her baby. pwf2412, is that law righteous or evil?
SHOdriver1992 2 years ago
I have already said abortion is wrong, try paying attention.
I believe that Jesus is happier with the person who fights and changes the law so that Abortions become illeagle in most states, so that instead of 1 million abortions a year ther are only 500,000 abortions a year, instead of with the person who says abortion is evil but because they can't get gid of it everywhere they don't get rid of it anywhere.
I save half of the babies and you save none, who cares more?
pwf2412 2 years ago
The fact you believe abortion is wrong makes your position even more egregious if you believe it should be left up to each state to decide. Would you have the same position if a state decided they wanted to bring slavery back? There has never been one abortion law that has had the authority to save even one baby. Every one of them effectively says " Do this or do that and then you can kill the baby." I see you dodged my question. Is a law like that righteous or evil? Please answer.
SHOdriver1992 2 years ago
I see you dodged my question too.
If you would bother to pay attention, I said it should be a state matter because it would be easier to defeat on a state level. I want the states to have control so we can make it illeagle easier. at a federal level, it is almost impossible to change, but at a state level the number of places abortions were available would drop to over half of the current places. which would mean a sharp drop in the total number of abortions
pwf2412 2 years ago
which is what you claim to want, yet, because you can't stop them all at once, you don't want to stop any. in effect, you support abortion and the destruction of millions of innocent children is firmly on your shoulders.
And just so you will shut up about your stupid question, the law is neither evil nor good, the act of abortion is evil.
The fact that some states have passed a law requiring women to see the baby before an abortion is overall a good thing, .....
pwf2412 2 years ago
if seeinf the baby changes the mind of even one woman and causes her not to have the abortion, then it was worth it.
Again you look at it from the point that because most women go ahead with the abortion, a decision they had already made, then the law is somehow evil, Christ must surely weep that you don't rejoice in the fact that even one child is saved.
pwf2412 2 years ago
Plus, I live in Colorado. We had over 580,000 people vote for Amendment 48, our personhood amendment. I personally went out and solicited signatures for the petition to get it on the ballot and we received over 131,000 signatures, way more than we needed. We are now using that as a springboard for many more pro-life efforts. What are you personally doing in your state for the pro-life effort?
SHOdriver1992 2 years ago
I voulnteer at a local Christian womans facility to help them with their pregnancies and help with adoptions and with raising their children. I volunteer with local politicians who are pro life. Please don't try and pretend that I don't do what I can.
Unlike you, I rejoice in even one life saved
pwf2412 2 years ago
Does that Christian womans' facility know you are pro-choice?
SHOdriver1992 2 years ago
I did answer your question. I said the state-by-state position is evil. You aren't pro-life, you're pro-choice state-by-state. You're no different than someone who says they are personally against abortion but believe in a woman's right to choose. You're position says, "I'm pro-life but I believe in a state's right to choose." pwf2412, you, in fact, are PRO-CHOICE! Now, answer my question! Is a law that says, "...and then you can kill the baby" righteous or evil?
SHOdriver1992 2 years ago
Pay Attention
"And just so you will shut up about your stupid question, the law is neither evil nor good, the act of abortion is evil."
"if seeinf the baby changes the mind of even one woman and causes her not to have the abortion, then it was worth it."
pwf2412 2 years ago
Pay Attention Again
"I want the states to have control so we can make it illeagle easier. at a federal level, it is almost impossible to change, but at a state level the number of places abortions were available would drop to over half of the current places. which would mean a sharp drop in the total number of abortions"
How in the world is this PRO CHOICE?
you are an idiot
pwf2412 2 years ago
So, pwf2412, if a state legislator walked up to you and said, "Hey, I'm going to propose a law that says if a woman views an ultrasound, then she can KILL HER BABY," you would answer, "Hey, I'm good with that."? So on one hand you say you are pro-life, and on the other hand you are actually pro-choice ultrasound-by-ultrasound. You have interpreted the 6th commandment to say, "Thou shalt not murder unless you view an ultrasound." You can't see how wicked that is? You need to repent, pwf2412.
SHOdriver1992 2 years ago
you are an idiot, are you trying to tell me that the intent of the law was just so the woman could see the baby she was killing? No!! the intent is such that a woman would be forced to see the baby as the child it is and to help REDUCE the number of abortions. LIKE I ALREADY said, if even one woman changes her mind because of what she sees than the law was and is a good thing.
Are you trying to say that a woman is more likely to change her mind if she DOESN'T see the baby.
pwf2412 2 years ago
You say each state has the CHOICE to make killing unborn children legal if they CHOOSE to. You believe a woman has the CHOICE to kill her baby if she views an ultrasound first and then CHOOSES to kill it. You believe a minor girl's parents have the CHOICE to allow her to kill her baby if she tells them first and they CHOOSE to allow her to have an abortion. pwf2412, you are pro-choice whether you want to admit it or not. I'm 100% pro-life. You're something less than 100% pro-life.
SHOdriver1992 2 years ago
show me where I said any of that? quit being an idiot and actua;;y show me where I said any of that. you are using the same liberal tactics the rest of your friends use and putting words in my mouth I never said.
You are a liar. I said it should be a state choice BECAUSE then it would be easier to make abortions illeagle. I never even said any of the rest.
pwf2412 2 years ago
You believe abortion should be left up to each state so that means you are pro-choice state-by-state. You don't have to say the actual words for others to know what you mean by your stand on an issue.
SHOdriver1992 2 years ago
he question you didn't answer..
"I save half of the babies and you save none, who cares more? "
Answer that one. If by make abortion a state choice and then limiting the number pf states abortions are available. millions of babies would be saved.
Tell me how saving have of the aborted babies is worse than saving NONE of them?
Answer that question or shut up
pwf2412 2 years ago
You cannot say how many babies would ever be saved with you efforts, but I can definitively say ALL abortions would end when the personhood of the unborn child is established. Just like slavery was ended when the personhood of the black person was established. Let me ask you this, did William Wilberforce compromise on slavery or did he settle for nothing less than the elimination of slavery?
SHOdriver1992 2 years ago
Do you somehow believe that I don't support a federal change? Really, That is what you believe? you are even more of an Idiot than I already know you to be.
Unlike you I also fight for what ever victory I can get. If I can get the State of Indiana to ban all abortions or even some abortions. I count that as a victory.
If I can help get a law passed that requires to have an ultra sound and see her baby. and that ultra sound changes the mind of one woman. THAT IS A VICTORY.
pwf2412 2 years ago
There are more important things than abortion ok. Look closer so you can see the bigger picture.
RandomlyExplicit 2 years ago 3
You actually believe there are more important issues than intentionally murdering unborn children? Go to hell.
SHOdriver1992 2 years ago
if that is where he goes you will be the one to meet him. you are a liar and your insistance on all or nothing will continue to allow millions of children to be murdered. I am done with you. I would ask that everyone here just ignore this idiot. hopefuly without anyone to "play" with this moron will go away.
pwf2412 2 years ago
Bill Clinton: "It depends on what the meaning of 'is' is."
pwf2412: "It depends on what the meaning of 'choice' is."
SHOdriver1992 2 years ago
SHOdriver1992 needs to understand that there are more important issues than abortion. Yes abortion is wrong but it shouldn't be the only thing we should care about. I agree with you on the Federal part, were you said it would be easier to fight at a state level. If this is all women care about than god help us all. Take care.
RandomlyExplicit 2 years ago 3
People who pick at grammatical errors instead of debating ideas have nothing worthwhile to say. How does Paul's stance on abortion make him "evil" in any way other than he supports it's existence? If that is the case, then Pin Stripe is the most evil since he is in favor of the federal government supporting and providing abortions.
jtkirkfan2002 2 years ago 2
People who pick at people who pick at grammatical errors of others should mind their own business. By the way, I did debate an idea, the idea that Ron Paul is a good candidate. Anyone who is in favor of the federal government supporting and providing abortions is evil and anyone in favor of states supporting and providing abortions is evil as well.
SHOdriver1992 2 years ago
You didn't debate anything. However the lib's got where they are through incrementalism. The sad truth is that most of the public is numb toward the subject of abortion so it's not going to be eliminated soon. However, if it's legality were to be returned to the states where it belongs, we could use incrementalism to attack it state-by-state.
jtkirkfan2002 2 years ago
If Obama decides to sign FOCA, 35 years of incrementalism will vanish instantly. The reason is because incrementalism is built on the sand of compromise while uncompromise is built on the rock of conviction. Establishing personhood of the unborn from the moment of creation is the only rock that will end abortion abortion once and for all in this country exactly the same way establishing personhood of black people ended slavery in this country once and for all.
SHOdriver1992 2 years ago
abortion is evil, but it should be a state right. the fact that the courts took it from the states is what makes abortions so plentiful. abortion would be easier to fight on a state level, than on a federal level
pwf2412 2 years ago
When you say abortion is evil, "but," whatever you say after the "but" has to be evil...and it was.
SHOdriver1992 2 years ago
you just don't pay any attention do you?
pwf2412 2 years ago
you are one of those idiots destroying the conservative movement. instead of voting for the republican whio can move the party and the country in the right direction, you vote for some idiot 3rd party schmuck who doesn't stand a chance at winning, because the candidate who could win, doesn't agree a 100% with your issues. The truth is the dems didn't get the power they have now all at once, they got it a little at a time, but morons like you are the ones keeping the repubs from doing the same
pwf2412 2 years ago 2
Which Republican was I supposed to vote for who could have moved the party and the country in the right direction? Don't say John McCain unless you want to show what an ignoramus you are in public.
SHOdriver1992 2 years ago
John McCain, would have been a step in the right direction over BHO, but no, you couldn't do that so you voted for a candidate that stood absolutly no chance of winning, thereby giving the country and the lives of millions of unborn babies into the hands of the radical left. Do you think BHO will nominate any conservative judges to the bench? What about McCain? Much better chance with McCain. but you stood on principal and now more babies will die
pwf2412 2 years ago
Was GW pro-life? No. Is John McCain pro-life? No. I'm only interested in pro-life candidates. Conservative judges? Ha! What a joke. In case you weren't aware, all six judges that voted to kill Terry Schiavo were Republican, so-called conservative judges. They were all nominated by GHW Bush, Ronald Reagan, and GW Bush. With judges like that, who needs enemies? Plus, out of all the so-called conservative Supreme Court judges, name me one who is pro-life. I'll make it easy on you. There isn't one.
SHOdriver1992 2 years ago
Jodie looks good in that color. Great jokes today, too!
joedoufu 2 years ago
"Or they could just pass Obama's budget!" LMAO
sirdaffy 2 years ago 3
please watch- geithner needs your help
3mporary 2 years ago
Great humor and satire.
bertly71 2 years ago 2
Love you babe! hair toss Catch you next time!
mccommas2 2 years ago 2
"Until they realized president Bush was no longer in office. Then they went home."
Hahahahaaaaaa! That got a good chuckle out of me!
QuartuvLarry 2 years ago 6
Barry's wasteful spending will cripple generations to come.
philblunt420 2 years ago 2
I'm changing my last name to General Motors
AllanR2D2 2 years ago
nice! Auto makers want more money? How about going out and raising it like GE did?! Ruins the price of the stocks, but at least you'll have some money
joebrueske 2 years ago
That lil' Zac Efron is dreamy!
TheStupidWhiteGuy 2 years ago
I told my "tween" daughter that I thought he'd be a good choice to play Little Joe in a remake movie of "Bonanza". She replied with "What's a 'Bonanza'?"
The preceding was a generational gap joke.
jtkirkfan2002 2 years ago
she is great....but I still hate mustard.
mustardsucks 2 years ago
NewsBusted Rocks!
HippiesAreNazis 2 years ago
Lol... I love watching your news. Thanks. Take care:)
chattingcat 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
"yes moron, canned laughter. It's part of the joke."
Hm. Just not that funny. The jokes, the canned laughter. It's just not working.
You need a live audience for the laughs to work.
If you want to parodize canned laughter, you'd need the crappiest/generic canned laugh and blatantly repeat the exact laugh.
If that doesn't work...have Jodi at least show some cleavage. That will work.
moronpaul 2 years ago
Your screen name is appropriate, moron paul.
pimpdalyrical 2 years ago 3
Meh. That's why I chose it.
moronpaul 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Canned laughter?
Oh jeez....
moronpaul 2 years ago
yes moron, canned laughter. It's part of the joke.
gailalison10 2 years ago 3
you can always tell the new people
pwf2412 2 years ago 2
5***** Jodi.
safeharbor7 2 years ago 5
Great as always, I wanted to laugh, but it was so true it didn't seem funny anymore. Somewhere inside, I'm sure I am chuckling.
bookhound63 2 years ago 12
At least the anti-war protestors are still showing up with Obama in office. I remember the marches on the White House and the compounds outside Bill Clinton's Arkansas home when he sent troops to Bosnia, Mogadishu, and bombed Iraq. Oh, wait. That never happened.
jtkirkfan2002 2 years ago 20
I used to like Mellencamp until all of his songs tried to tell me how to think. John, we don't care if you're a lib, we just don't want to hear about it in every song.
jtkirkfan2002 2 years ago 11
Awesome...Sean Penn....what a joke
DangerFamily 2 years ago 15
ya branched out.... well rounded... actually funny..... best vid you have ever done
WERTY317 2 years ago 3
Ooooh, that Jodi is one hot babe.
Nice vid.
5 stars for you gal.
sakahowdah 2 years ago 12