The Yak 36 and 141 are way cooler than any other Vtol. Yeah they're not any good whatsoever (Except for handling, which they were widely praised for) but you have to remember the time in which these planes were developed.
В те тяжёлые времена в отношении Як-141 были жёсткие требования, так как его предшественник 38ой не особо оправдал надежды палубной авиации.Дефицит военного бюджета, плюс та авария. На программу вертикального взлёта забили.
The soviets designed a supersonic STOVL aircraft in the 70's... Something the french, american and british failed at or achieved with little succes (as with the french dassault balzac...)
So i wouldn't laugh of soviet technology neither of american one... Both have their strenght and weaknesses and in any fight where you put 2 squadrons of different countries with differnet airplanes in a simulated dogfight, you get interesting and sometimes unexpectd results...
The american bought yakovlev's bureau expertise on the lift-fan system and it's a good thing they did. Most STOVL aircraft were failures and it seems like the marines version of the F-35 has been doing rather well... The harrier was a good airplane but can be vulnerable in a dogfight due to its limited maximum airspeed...The american did a good move: in doing so they saved money and finally they have a very potent supersonic STOVL fighter. The soviets did an amazing job designing this technology
The YAK-141 was the follow-up of the yak-38 Forger, a copy of the british carrier. The YAK-38 was dangerous to fly and plagued by various reliability amd technical issues. The 141 was designed alongside what would beconme the Su-27 and the Mig-29... The soviets considered the airplane a possible candidate for all their air forces, not only the navy. They favored the cheaper, easier to maintain su-27 and mig-29... STOVL has always been plagued by low range and small ordonance cariying capacity
runescape play itrunescape play itrunescape play itrunescape play itrunescape play itrunescape play itrunescape play itrunescape play itrunescape play itrunescape play itrunescape play itrunescape play itrunescape play itrunescape play itrunescape play itrunescape play itrunescape play itrunescape play itrunescape play itrunescape play itrunescape play itrunescape play itrunescape play itrunescape play itrunescape play itrunescape play itrunescape play itrunescape play itrunescape play itrunesca
Ну чеж вы так на американцев наезжаете? Ониж отупели в конец и сами нифига ни разработать ни спиздить не могут и поэтому к братским странам за помощю обращаются. Та модификация F 35 что с верикалкой оснащена двигателем Rolls-Royce. Вот им свои притензии и предъявляите. ))))
well, its a thing called tender, also, F35 will be in air forces off all nations conributing to its development, total of 14, including Brittain with their Rolls Royce engines. USSR/NATO always cheated and stole each others thech researches. Like Tu4 is a B29 copy, and Mi4 is a Sykorsky helicopetr copy. So what if F35 has some specs of Yak141? today software is more important than hardware.
hmm...cessna on W7? i didnt know that russians fly Y-2 using Ubuntu :)))) u seem to miss a point, hardware-wise the planes are similar, and their performance hasnt really changed from 70s tech. what it is today its a modification of the past technologies, the information gathering/processing(thus software as i put it roughly) are more important than the Pugachevs Kobra. im still awating to see this manoeuvre's effectivness in real combat, not on airshow displays.
There was the same delusion behind F-4 and Mig-23 deployment back in history. Both were spacecraft of it's time in terms of 'software' as you call it and both suck at combat finishing as absolete strike bombers.
It is also wrong about '70s tech' as you call it. There is a shift right now towards gen.5th which is way different concept.
Gen4th jets were different too. F-15 ain't no Mig and vice versa.
personally, i think F35 is not that great of a machine, i like the Raptor. but, again, as the pentagon announced, F35 will be the lats manned aircraft to be designed in the states. the future belongs to unmanned, and even robotized autonomous systems. and then there will be the robot wars.
well, u tell me..the head of pentagon says that they are going unmanned...i would say remember the Johnny Mnemonic, low-tech vs hith-tech. unmanned vs manned. its a game of catch-up. and the gap wides with every year.
But I think YAK made a aircraft early than BAE create a HARRIER.... and USA create F22.... Dont U think???? n who copy who???? F14 create after MIG25...... U want to forget the history???
@GLR26591 the basic Harrier layout dates to 1957.30years before the Yak-141 & 20 before the Yak-38. Aircraft development comes from everywhere. All designers look at what others else are doing and see if they can use or improve on it.Some of the feature on the Yak38 are similar to both the Harrier and/or the German VWF VAK. Copying no.Just using existing technology where appropriate and developing new technology when required. The Harrier started from a French idea, ducted thrust from the USA
@GLR26591 The Yak-141 design dates from 1975. The Hawker P.1127 design began in 1957. The YAK -38, probably inspired by the Harrier, began in the late 1960's. Your are right but for the wrong reasons, it isn't a copy as it has a completely different configuration. Any similarities are because they are designed for a similar purpose.
According to Janes All the Worlds Aircraft 2001-2002, page 687, and in June 1994 [Lockheed-Martin] revealed agreement with Yakovlev of Russia to purchase data on cancelled Yak-141 programme, which employed similar articulating rear nozzle as part of its propulsion system".
as is the JSF copy of yak.you americans can"t accept that someone did something before you.maybe the gagarin wasn"t the first person in space after all,or maybe he was an american ha?
just like the Russians copied the Christie suspension system for the T-34, and how many times have Russians set foot on the moon???
OH THAT'S RIGHT NINE, ZERO..the their "shuttle" copied from the US only flew once..then was destroyed when the Russian built hanger it was in collapsed..Go Russian engineering..it suck!!!!
First of all Americans never landed on the moon. And on the shuttle matter, our was flown by wire without any people flying it. Beat that american engineering.
No really They'we talked about it Americans never went to the moon. Shadows and wiind were found on the video. Video was made on earth.There is a program about it
Don't you think it's funny that there was a race to get there, and the Russians themselves observed and verified the landings with their own satelites and equipment.
Remember, they didn't just go there once.
This is a dumb theory started by arm-chair "experts" who haven't got a clue what they're looking at.
Your problem is, you're only looking at one side. These conspiracy DVD's themselves are a piece of piss to debunk.
acidents happen. the russians were influenced by the suspension system and made up something similar and better. second the buran shuttle was not copied, the design was conventional for every other country wanting to also amke one. if yopu havent noticed every commercial airliner in the world looks the bloody same.
you can't say is a copy of the sea harrier because they both can do a vertical take off. If you compare the JSF and detail it you notice that the tail and engine are very similar to the yak
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
As with most Russian aircraft the Yak-141 was a poor copy of the British Hawker and US Harrier 20 years later. The Russian Yak-141 was a pretty good plane compare to Russian standards. The Yak-141 was discontinued in 1991 with the crumbling of communism
everyone copies if you like to think it that way. i guess the tomcat was copied off the mig-29's layouts and the tomcat looked like the mig-25..so i guess we are all cheaters. no its called conventional thinking, in the scientific community thats mostly occuring.
Do Russians have time machine, to steal future technology fro America? How can they stil 30 years before American F 35, wow. You sound very inteligent. Americans still everything, not Russians.
Comrade, I have lived with Americans for a long time, take this from me- a large majority of Americans are subhumans, so don't be surprised by the completely psychopathic reasoning they indulge in.
JSF was a copy of the Yak-141 and it amazes me how well kept of a secret this was. I only knew this aircraft existed in the 90's but it was built and designed in the 70's. Really impressive, with this clip I also found out that there were several built and one can be found in Monino (#141). Cool thanks for the vids:) (it was sad to see one crash though but overall successful just lack of funds)
algol60 was very good...
flyblu80 2 weeks ago
computer...which language of computing is used in russia in the 70'...?, well there are in this years: fortran, fortran77, algol60, algol68...
flyblu80 2 weeks ago
I have a faster computer than theirs, LOL.
gregrutz 1 month ago
отец F 35
Teyijas 2 months ago
YAK-36 first flight: 9th January 1963
Harrier first flight: 28th December 1968
SovjetPhoenix 7 months ago
@SovjetPhoenix harrier prototype first flew in 1960 .
YAK-36 first flew in 1963
The YAK-36 design was further influenced with the development of the British Hawker Siddeley P.1127
i like how you make up dates on an aircraft superior than the yak-36/141
JrGuacamoles 4 months ago
@JrGuacamoles Influenced?
it was a secret experimental fighter...what makes you think Russia was looking at Wikipedia 50 years ago?
Yaks are older than the harriers.
they are VTOL, just because they can vertically land and take off doesnt mean they are a copy....
it still takes some great minds to make it.
influence or not.
Dreadnought942 3 months ago
Блин нет уже великого СССР. Было время когда нам было чем гордится.
lilian20ful 1 year ago 5
The Yak 36 and 141 are way cooler than any other Vtol. Yeah they're not any good whatsoever (Except for handling, which they were widely praised for) but you have to remember the time in which these planes were developed.
Imagine a 2010 modernized Yak 141. Epic right?
The Yak-38 has no good side :/
peepeevagi 1 year ago
В те тяжёлые времена в отношении Як-141 были жёсткие требования, так как его предшественник 38ой не особо оправдал надежды палубной авиации.Дефицит военного бюджета, плюс та авария. На программу вертикального взлёта забили.
Boom2153 1 year ago
The soviets designed a supersonic STOVL aircraft in the 70's... Something the french, american and british failed at or achieved with little succes (as with the french dassault balzac...)
So i wouldn't laugh of soviet technology neither of american one... Both have their strenght and weaknesses and in any fight where you put 2 squadrons of different countries with differnet airplanes in a simulated dogfight, you get interesting and sometimes unexpectd results...
sukoimig 1 year ago
The american bought yakovlev's bureau expertise on the lift-fan system and it's a good thing they did. Most STOVL aircraft were failures and it seems like the marines version of the F-35 has been doing rather well... The harrier was a good airplane but can be vulnerable in a dogfight due to its limited maximum airspeed...The american did a good move: in doing so they saved money and finally they have a very potent supersonic STOVL fighter. The soviets did an amazing job designing this technology
sukoimig 1 year ago
sukoimig,
harrier limited maximum airspeed?????
sorry , with all respect, do not believe the specs they are given!!!
like i don t believe the specs wich are given for russian jets
MrRogueAngel 1 year ago
The YAK-141 was the follow-up of the yak-38 Forger, a copy of the british carrier. The YAK-38 was dangerous to fly and plagued by various reliability amd technical issues. The 141 was designed alongside what would beconme the Su-27 and the Mig-29... The soviets considered the airplane a possible candidate for all their air forces, not only the navy. They favored the cheaper, easier to maintain su-27 and mig-29... STOVL has always been plagued by low range and small ordonance cariying capacity
sukoimig 1 year ago
runescape play itrunescape play itrunescape play itrunescape play itrunescape play itrunescape play itrunescape play itrunescape play itrunescape play itrunescape play itrunescape play itrunescape play itrunescape play itrunescape play itrunescape play itrunescape play itrunescape play itrunescape play itrunescape play itrunescape play itrunescape play itrunescape play itrunescape play itrunescape play itrunescape play itrunescape play itrunescape play itrunescape play itrunescape play itrunesca
messaoud1234512345 1 year ago
Ну чеж вы так на американцев наезжаете? Ониж отупели в конец и сами нифига ни разработать ни спиздить не могут и поэтому к братским странам за помощю обращаются. Та модификация F 35 что с верикалкой оснащена двигателем Rolls-Royce. Вот им свои притензии и предъявляите. ))))
HeXnoXHax 2 years ago 2
well, its a thing called tender, also, F35 will be in air forces off all nations conributing to its development, total of 14, including Brittain with their Rolls Royce engines. USSR/NATO always cheated and stole each others thech researches. Like Tu4 is a B29 copy, and Mi4 is a Sykorsky helicopetr copy. So what if F35 has some specs of Yak141? today software is more important than hardware.
tbilisicentral 2 years ago
Get a life. Put Windows 7 on cessna and start airwar with Russia with it. I'm eager to look at that.
zipacna1980 1 year ago
hmm...cessna on W7? i didnt know that russians fly Y-2 using Ubuntu :)))) u seem to miss a point, hardware-wise the planes are similar, and their performance hasnt really changed from 70s tech. what it is today its a modification of the past technologies, the information gathering/processing(thus software as i put it roughly) are more important than the Pugachevs Kobra. im still awating to see this manoeuvre's effectivness in real combat, not on airshow displays.
with best regards
tbilisicentral 1 year ago
There was the same delusion behind F-4 and Mig-23 deployment back in history. Both were spacecraft of it's time in terms of 'software' as you call it and both suck at combat finishing as absolete strike bombers.
It is also wrong about '70s tech' as you call it. There is a shift right now towards gen.5th which is way different concept.
Gen4th jets were different too. F-15 ain't no Mig and vice versa.
zipacna1980 1 year ago
personally, i think F35 is not that great of a machine, i like the Raptor. but, again, as the pentagon announced, F35 will be the lats manned aircraft to be designed in the states. the future belongs to unmanned, and even robotized autonomous systems. and then there will be the robot wars.
tbilisicentral 1 year ago
Dream on. War is a people business. People are still alive until they are not outsoursing it. Remember terminator:)
zipacna1980 1 year ago
well, u tell me..the head of pentagon says that they are going unmanned...i would say remember the Johnny Mnemonic, low-tech vs hith-tech. unmanned vs manned. its a game of catch-up. and the gap wides with every year.
tbilisicentral 1 year ago
Америка слизала технологию.....уроды ебанные,жаль что заморозили
Alcogol1 2 years ago 2
Все намного лучше, документация по 41 была продана американцам
RudiyR 2 years ago
Translation: "JSF is a knockoff of the Yak - 141"
tejavia 2 years ago 2
My wife's grandfather worked at the Saratov Aircraft Factory (SAZ).
tejavia 2 years ago
engineers at work,hopefully ill be like them one da
klipsch21 2 years ago
great job from YAKOVLEV...i am sure that if they had more money they would be very far from the F35, 30years before
GLR26591 2 years ago 18
Great footage - thanks for sharing!
okb1068 3 years ago
2:15 The landing wasn't very hard, how did it catch fire?
Avantime 3 years ago
The rear landing gear failed on landing which might lead to the fuel tank to get ruptured and then catch on fire.
TheAmericanPageant 2 years ago
But I think YAK made a aircraft early than BAE create a HARRIER.... and USA create F22.... Dont U think???? n who copy who???? F14 create after MIG25...... U want to forget the history???
idaman6550 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
ussr russia copy steal from england jetfighter harrier
bestamerica 3 years ago
Yak-141 is oldier than the england's harrier....so!!!! they are not stealers
GLR26591 2 years ago 13
@GLR26591 the basic Harrier layout dates to 1957.30years before the Yak-141 & 20 before the Yak-38. Aircraft development comes from everywhere. All designers look at what others else are doing and see if they can use or improve on it.Some of the feature on the Yak38 are similar to both the Harrier and/or the German VWF VAK. Copying no.Just using existing technology where appropriate and developing new technology when required. The Harrier started from a French idea, ducted thrust from the USA
binaway 1 year ago
@GLR26591 The Yak-141 design dates from 1975. The Hawker P.1127 design began in 1957. The YAK -38, probably inspired by the Harrier, began in the late 1960's. Your are right but for the wrong reasons, it isn't a copy as it has a completely different configuration. Any similarities are because they are designed for a similar purpose.
binaway 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
yak38 the worst plane ever built
Boinkmakr 3 years ago
According to Janes All the Worlds Aircraft 2001-2002, page 687, and in June 1994 [Lockheed-Martin] revealed agreement with Yakovlev of Russia to purchase data on cancelled Yak-141 programme, which employed similar articulating rear nozzle as part of its propulsion system".
skypogo 3 years ago 2
as is the JSF copy of yak.you americans can"t accept that someone did something before you.maybe the gagarin wasn"t the first person in space after all,or maybe he was an american ha?
INDIFICIENTER 3 years ago
just like the Russians copied the Christie suspension system for the T-34, and how many times have Russians set foot on the moon???
OH THAT'S RIGHT NINE, ZERO..the their "shuttle" copied from the US only flew once..then was destroyed when the Russian built hanger it was in collapsed..Go Russian engineering..it suck!!!!
hitide286 3 years ago
First of all Americans never landed on the moon. And on the shuttle matter, our was flown by wire without any people flying it. Beat that american engineering.
VKBLACK888 3 years ago
Moron... LOL
belzebutt68 3 years ago
No really They'we talked about it Americans never went to the moon. Shadows and wiind were found on the video. Video was made on earth.There is a program about it
Tolmach 3 years ago
Nice conspiracy theory you got there.
Don't you think it's funny that there was a race to get there, and the Russians themselves observed and verified the landings with their own satelites and equipment.
Remember, they didn't just go there once.
This is a dumb theory started by arm-chair "experts" who haven't got a clue what they're looking at.
Your problem is, you're only looking at one side. These conspiracy DVD's themselves are a piece of piss to debunk.
JeefCakes 2 years ago
acidents happen. the russians were influenced by the suspension system and made up something similar and better. second the buran shuttle was not copied, the design was conventional for every other country wanting to also amke one. if yopu havent noticed every commercial airliner in the world looks the bloody same.
sovietamerican2 3 years ago 2
Agreed........
idaman6550 3 years ago
you can't say is a copy of the sea harrier because they both can do a vertical take off. If you compare the JSF and detail it you notice that the tail and engine are very similar to the yak
luisgecarr 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
As with most Russian aircraft the Yak-141 was a poor copy of the British Hawker and US Harrier 20 years later. The Russian Yak-141 was a pretty good plane compare to Russian standards. The Yak-141 was discontinued in 1991 with the crumbling of communism
billcavazos 3 years ago
yes ussr russia always copy steal from america and england jetfighters
bestamerica 3 years ago
everyone copies if you like to think it that way. i guess the tomcat was copied off the mig-29's layouts and the tomcat looked like the mig-25..so i guess we are all cheaters. no its called conventional thinking, in the scientific community thats mostly occuring.
sovietamerican2 3 years ago
..yeah right..just like the engines in the Mig15's..weren't copies of the Rolls Royce design...and where did Tu-4 design come from???
hitide286 3 years ago
The Tupolev Tu-4 design came from the Boeing B-29 Superfortress and that indeed was an exact copy with some exception.
TheAmericanPageant 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
american B-29 was fhe first make it,,,
ussr russia Tu-4 did cheat copy steal from america
bestamerica 2 years ago
Do Russians have time machine, to steal future technology fro America? How can they stil 30 years before American F 35, wow. You sound very inteligent. Americans still everything, not Russians.
polo8808 2 years ago
Comrade, I have lived with Americans for a long time, take this from me- a large majority of Americans are subhumans, so don't be surprised by the completely psychopathic reasoning they indulge in.
psychologicalshock 2 years ago
失敗の積み重ねは成功の元だがお金と時間が掛かる・・
ロシアもアメリカ、どちらの技術者も良い仕事をした。
ej20takowrc 3 years ago 2
so what is next project/plane from Yak? Is there any?
Globox822 3 years ago
Yak 141 is a good airplane!
toulon33480399 3 years ago
Yak 141 looks cool
CaptainCool07 3 years ago
to sad the program is stopet now, if i would be defence minister of switzerland i would buy stright about 30 of this aircrafts.
swisstestpilot 3 years ago
Interesting! the Yak 141 looked like such a capable airplane. It's too bad they cancelled it.
bombarderoazul 3 years ago
JSF was a copy of the Yak-141 and it amazes me how well kept of a secret this was. I only knew this aircraft existed in the 90's but it was built and designed in the 70's. Really impressive, with this clip I also found out that there were several built and one can be found in Monino (#141). Cool thanks for the vids:) (it was sad to see one crash though but overall successful just lack of funds)
strizhi 3 years ago 2