Added: 4 years ago
From: Menelaylay
Views: 58,569
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (65)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • algol60 was very good...

  • computer...which language of computing is used in russia in the 70'...?, well there are in this years: fortran, fortran77, algol60, algol68...

  • I have a faster computer than theirs, LOL.

  • отец F 35

  • YAK-36 first flight: 9th January 1963

    Harrier first flight: 28th December 1968

    

  • @SovjetPhoenix harrier prototype first flew in 1960 .

    YAK-36 first flew in 1963

    The YAK-36 design was further influenced with the development of the British Hawker Siddeley P.1127

    i like how you make up dates on an aircraft superior than the yak-36/141

  • @JrGuacamoles Influenced?

    it was a secret experimental fighter...what makes you think Russia was looking at Wikipedia 50 years ago?

    Yaks are older than the harriers.

    they are VTOL, just because they can vertically land and take off doesnt mean they are a copy....

    it still takes some great minds to make it.

    influence or not.

  • Блин нет уже великого СССР. Было время когда нам было чем гордится.

  • The Yak 36 and 141 are way cooler than any other Vtol. Yeah they're not any good whatsoever (Except for handling, which they were widely praised for) but you have to remember the time in which these planes were developed.

    Imagine a 2010 modernized Yak 141. Epic right?

    The Yak-38 has no good side :/

  • В те тяжёлые времена в отношении Як-141 были жёсткие требования, так как его предшественник 38ой не особо оправдал надежды палубной авиации.Дефицит военного бюджета, плюс та авария. На программу вертикального взлёта забили.

  • The soviets designed a supersonic STOVL aircraft in the 70's... Something the french, american and british failed at or achieved with little succes (as with the french dassault balzac...)

    So i wouldn't laugh of soviet technology neither of american one... Both have their strenght and weaknesses and in any fight where you put 2 squadrons of different countries with differnet airplanes in a simulated dogfight, you get interesting and sometimes unexpectd results...

  • The american bought yakovlev's bureau expertise on the lift-fan system and it's a good thing they did. Most STOVL aircraft were failures and it seems like the marines version of the F-35 has been doing rather well... The harrier was a good airplane but can be vulnerable in a dogfight due to its limited maximum airspeed...The american did a good move: in doing so they saved money and finally they have a very potent supersonic STOVL fighter. The soviets did an amazing job designing this technology

  • sukoimig,

    harrier limited maximum airspeed?????

    sorry , with all respect, do not believe the specs they are given!!!

    like i don t believe the specs wich are given for russian jets

  • The YAK-141 was the follow-up of the yak-38 Forger, a copy of the british carrier. The YAK-38 was dangerous to fly and plagued by various reliability amd technical issues. The 141 was designed alongside what would beconme the Su-27 and the Mig-29... The soviets considered the airplane a possible candidate for all their air forces, not only the navy. They favored the cheaper, easier to maintain su-27 and mig-29... STOVL has always been plagued by low range and small ordonance cariying capacity

  • runescape play itrunescape play itrunescape play itrunescape play itrunescape play itrunescape play itrunescape play itrunescape play itrunescape play itrunescape play itrunescape play itrunescape play itrunescape play itrunescape play itrunescape play itrunescape play itrunescape play itrunescape play itrunescape play itrunescape play itrunescape play itrunescape play itrunescape play itrunescape play itrunescape play itrunescape play itrunescape play itrunescape play itrunescape play itrunesca

  • Ну чеж вы так на американцев наезжаете? Ониж отупели в конец и сами нифига ни разработать ни спиздить не могут и поэтому к братским странам за помощю обращаются. Та модификация F 35 что с верикалкой оснащена двигателем Rolls-Royce. Вот им свои притензии и предъявляите. ))))

  • well, its a thing called tender, also, F35 will be in air forces off all nations conributing to its development, total of 14, including Brittain with their Rolls Royce engines. USSR/NATO always cheated and stole each others thech researches. Like Tu4 is a B29 copy, and Mi4 is a Sykorsky helicopetr copy. So what if F35 has some specs of Yak141? today software is more important than hardware.

  • Get a life. Put Windows 7 on cessna and start airwar with Russia with it. I'm eager to look at that.

  • hmm...cessna on W7? i didnt know that russians fly Y-2 using Ubuntu :)))) u seem to miss a point, hardware-wise the planes are similar, and their performance hasnt really changed from 70s tech. what it is today its a modification of the past technologies, the information gathering/processing(thus software as i put it roughly) are more important than the Pugachevs Kobra. im still awating to see this manoeuvre's effectivness in real combat, not on airshow displays.

    with best regards

  • There was the same delusion behind F-4 and Mig-23 deployment back in history. Both were spacecraft of it's time in terms of 'software' as you call it and both suck at combat finishing as absolete strike bombers.

    It is also wrong about '70s tech' as you call it. There is a shift right now towards gen.5th which is way different concept.

    Gen4th jets were different too. F-15 ain't no Mig and vice versa.

  • personally, i think F35 is not that great of a machine, i like the Raptor. but, again, as the pentagon announced, F35 will be the lats manned aircraft to be designed in the states. the future belongs to unmanned, and even robotized autonomous systems. and then there will be the robot wars.

  • Dream on. War is a people business. People are still alive until they are not outsoursing it. Remember terminator:)

  • well, u tell me..the head of pentagon says that they are going unmanned...i would say remember the Johnny Mnemonic, low-tech vs hith-tech. unmanned vs manned. its a game of catch-up. and the gap wides with every year.

  • Америка слизала технологию.....уроды ебанные,жаль что заморозили

  • Все намного лучше, документация по 41 была продана американцам

  • Translation: "JSF is a knockoff of the Yak - 141"

  • My wife's grandfather worked at the Saratov Aircraft Factory (SAZ).

  • engineers at work,hopefully ill be like them one da

  • great job from YAKOVLEV...i am sure that if they had more money they would be very far from the F35, 30years before

  • Great footage - thanks for sharing!

  • 2:15 The landing wasn't very hard, how did it catch fire?

  • The rear landing gear failed on landing which might lead to the fuel tank to get ruptured and then catch on fire.

  • But I think YAK made a aircraft early than BAE create a HARRIER.... and USA create F22.... Dont U think???? n who copy who???? F14 create after MIG25...... U want to forget the history???

  • Yak-141 is oldier than the england's harrier....so!!!! they are not stealers

  • @GLR26591 the basic Harrier layout dates to 1957.30years before the Yak-141 & 20 before the Yak-38. Aircraft development comes from everywhere. All designers look at what others else are doing and see if they can use or improve on it.Some of the feature on the Yak38 are similar to both the Harrier and/or the German VWF VAK. Copying no.Just using existing technology where appropriate and developing new technology when required. The Harrier started from a French idea, ducted thrust from the USA

  • @GLR26591 The Yak-141 design dates from 1975. The Hawker P.1127 design began in 1957. The YAK -38, probably inspired by the Harrier, began in the late 1960's. Your are right but for the wrong reasons, it isn't a copy as it has a completely different configuration. Any similarities are because they are designed for a similar purpose.

  • According to Janes All the Worlds Aircraft 2001-2002, page 687, and in June 1994 [Lockheed-Martin] revealed agreement with Yakovlev of Russia to purchase data on cancelled Yak-141 programme, which employed similar articulating rear nozzle as part of its propulsion system".

  • as is the JSF copy of yak.you americans can"t accept that someone did something before you.maybe the gagarin wasn"t the first person in space after all,or maybe he was an american ha?

  • just like the Russians copied the Christie suspension system for the T-34, and how many times have Russians set foot on the moon???

    OH THAT'S RIGHT NINE, ZERO..the their "shuttle" copied from the US only flew once..then was destroyed when the Russian built hanger it was in collapsed..Go Russian engineering..it suck!!!!

  • First of all Americans never landed on the moon. And on the shuttle matter, our was flown by wire without any people flying it. Beat that american engineering.

  • Moron... LOL

  • No really They'we talked about it Americans never went to the moon. Shadows and wiind were found on the video. Video was made on earth.There is a program about it

  • Nice conspiracy theory you got there.

    Don't you think it's funny that there was a race to get there, and the Russians themselves observed and verified the landings with their own satelites and equipment.

    Remember, they didn't just go there once.

    This is a dumb theory started by arm-chair "experts" who haven't got a clue what they're looking at.

    Your problem is, you're only looking at one side. These conspiracy DVD's themselves are a piece of piss to debunk.

  • acidents happen. the russians were influenced by the suspension system and made up something similar and better. second the buran shuttle was not copied, the design was conventional for every other country wanting to also amke one. if yopu havent noticed every commercial airliner in the world looks the bloody same.

  • Agreed........

  • you can't say is a copy of the sea harrier because they both can do a vertical take off. If you compare the JSF and detail it you notice that the tail and engine are very similar to the yak

  • yes ussr russia always copy steal from america and england jetfighters

  • everyone copies if you like to think it that way. i guess the tomcat was copied off the mig-29's layouts and the tomcat looked like the mig-25..so i guess we are all cheaters. no its called conventional thinking, in the scientific community thats mostly occuring.

  • ..yeah right..just like the engines in the Mig15's..weren't copies of the Rolls Royce design...and where did Tu-4 design come from???

  • The Tupolev Tu-4 design came from the Boeing B-29 Superfortress and that indeed was an exact copy with some exception.

  • Do Russians have time machine, to steal future technology fro America? How can they stil 30 years before American F 35, wow. You sound very inteligent. Americans still everything, not Russians.

  • Comrade, I have lived with Americans for a long time, take this from me- a large majority of Americans are subhumans, so don't be surprised by the completely psychopathic reasoning they indulge in.

  • 失敗の積み重ねは成功の元だがお金と時間が掛かる・・

    ロシアもアメリカ、どちらの技術者も良い仕事をした。

  • so what is next project/plane from Yak? Is there any?

  • Yak 141 is a good airplane!

  • Yak 141 looks cool

  • to sad the program is stopet now, if i would be defence minister of switzerland i would buy stright about 30 of this aircrafts.

  • Interesting! the Yak 141 looked like such a capable airplane. It's too bad they cancelled it.

  • JSF was a copy of the Yak-141 and it amazes me how well kept of a secret this was. I only knew this aircraft existed in the 90's but it was built and designed in the 70's. Really impressive, with this clip I also found out that there were several built and one can be found in Monino (#141). Cool thanks for the vids:) (it was sad to see one crash though but overall successful just lack of funds)

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more