Sex is popular among middle school and high school students. If abortions were illegal think of all the futures it will ruin. I can't imagine babies raising babies. If abstinence was the solution, think all kids will follow? Sex ed can only go so far too. Many boys want to be a man and many girls want to be women.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Bash the skulls of abortionists into the earth. Bash the skulls of murdering women. No mercy, no boundaries for action!!! Justice is justice. Baby murder is MURDER!!!
rise up christendom you wonderful fucked up religion! yay for christians, slaughter more people with your nazi pope. fuck you douche bag. PRO ABORTION!
I was actually really drunk when I posted that shit. I don't even remember posting that in fact. Sorry for the drunken comment. I don't like abortion but alcohol makes the tongue very loose and retarded.
It's that simple eh? If you do not want an abortion than don't have it. Who are you to impose your morals on others? Let people live freely and actually act like an American. Pro-life is anti-freedom.
Um. Yes. Non-sentient physiologically dependent organisms can hardly be considered "citizens".
I doubt the Founders could have DREAMED that would ever be implied. What fetal groups do you know of which wish to congregate? Publish literature? Carry a weapon?
I THINK that until the mid 1800's there was absolutely no legislation restricting abortion, and the first laws' wording suggest that concern for the woman's health was the motivating factor...
Since abortion has been practiced for thousands of years, it seems unlikely that our Founders would not know of its existence, and yet not a word about "fetal rights" in any official document anywhere. Could it possibly be that they never imagined abortion rights would ever need LEGAL protection?
Pro choicers are pro lifers too, they just understand that having a baby isn't for everyone, but generally sex is.
Abortion is a last resort to saving the hypothetical child from being raised by parents (or more likely parent) who just are't (or isn't) ready.
And for the record, all forms of abortion are medically and emotionally SAFER than any pregnancy taken to term. FACT. Look at any reputable statistics report.
Last I checked, sex results in babies. And for the record, a partial-birth abortion is not safer than delivering that baby, since the baby is virtually delivered during the proceedure.
you have no idea what you're talking about. And if you're a man, you have no right to even be angry about aborted fetuses. Not only can you not even produce one, you dont have to see or care for or even think twice about the fetuses that were or were not aborted.
Partial birth abortion is not safer than regular abortions, but it is just as safe as a regular birth. ESPECIALLY these days where most of the world has c-sections or needs contraction inducing drugs to start the labor. Just as safe, I assure you.
abortions save lives kinda. i think that personally if you have a babby any time during being a teenager, your life is over. its wrecked you have no fuckng hope. all your dreams n shit you can cry away because your new life is taking care of a mistake. abortions can give you a second chance. yes killing babies is wrong... so in the end
then stop fornicating, its no ones fault they were silly to fall pregnant. I dont care about the woman's right, the moment she laid down to have sex she lost that right. The baby dont have to pay with his life, for his/her mother's lack of self control, giving into all sexual lust or feelings
SEE: abortionfactsDOTcom and gargaroDOTcom These abortionists are even selling these poor babies body parts on the market. What barbarians we have in the world.
I bet you the first to talk shit about the women who can't support their children. You people are so gung ho to prevent abortions but your no where when those women need finacial and emotional help.
It better for you to also make the men in their lives take resposibility to be the one who pressured them into having one. Trust me it is against a womans nature to kill her own children. Unless there is something wrong with you of course. But 1st of all the procedure is very painfull and the woman who has one spend the rest of her days on earth regreting this decision. Trust me women who get abortions are not as heartless as you people think
im sure theyre not, i just dont agree with killing something that has the potential to become successful in life, and if abortion is gonna be legal, then stem cells shuld be legal also
Abortion has something to do with children in that it ends the life of one. A fetus is a nacent live human being, and has the rights that live humans are given. Sentience is not a prerequisite for human rights. And even if it were, is a one-day-old baby any more sentient than it was a day before it was born?
Think your position through before making assertions.
ABORTION IS A NON ISSUE. What difference does it make to you if I or my friends or any woman in this country or in this world get an an abortion? Zero. Women will continue to abort whether it's legal or not- the only difference is that less full grown women with lives and families will die if abortion stays a SAFE, LEGAL PROCEDURE.
Think about YOUR position before making assertions.
What difference it makes is that as I've stated above, every abortion destroys a human life. You're right that women will have abortions whether it's legal or not, but this certainly doesn't justify it. Rape will occur whether it is legal or not, but we all agree that rape is bad and shouldn't happen.
Whether or not abortion affects me has no bearing on whether or not it is wrong. Genocide in Africa doesn't affect me, but I can still speak out against it. The same is true for abortion.
Yes, but who decides what is indeed right or wrong? You? God?
Genocide in Africa is completely different because the humans that are murdered there are already fully developed, independent creatures, with lives and families and responsibilities. That infringes on a already widely accepted human right only because they are fully developed, independent creatures, with lives and families and responsibilities.
A fetus is a potential human. Until a little past the 2nd trimester of after, it is little more than a parasite, that would not, under any circumstance, survive without the mother. No science can save a fetus born before the 3rd trimester. Not to mention fetuses dont even feel pain until the third semester. I'm not saying I'm necessarily against 3rd trimester abortions, because I'd rather save the mother than save the potential baby, but I think they should and can be avoided.
You think fetuses are little more than parasites? I wonder what percentage of doctors would agree to that statement. The truth is that the fetus can feel pain long before the third trimester begins.
I'm going to stop arguing with you because I could beat you over the head with the facts and you'd still be as stubborn as an ass, and it's really not my problem buster.
I hope you get a vasectomy before ever trying to stop a woman you know from getting an abortion.
No. I'm sorry. A "child", by definition, does not live on, inside of, or attached to a person.
"nacent"?
Also, a "being" is usually defined as a sentient organism.
Sentience is NOT a "prerequisite for human rights", it is a prerequisite for all rights. It holds that in a moral system based on elimination of suffering, the right to be protected from suffering is proportional to one's ability TO suffer. :)
A one day old baby is NOT dependent on someone's body, is it? :D
Then you would be against Barrack Obama. He voted against the "Born Alive Infants Protection Act". This act simply said that any child who survives an abortion (fully born) should be provided medical care and treated like a human being. Barrack Obama voted against it in 2002. What are your thoughts on that? Just being curious.
From what I can find on the text of that Act, it seems to me to be common sense, although I hesitate to applaud it because I can't find much on its application since its passage. Also, from what I could find, the Senate passed it unanimously. Where did you read that Obama voted against it?
Sorry, I meant the "Induced Infant Liability Act" which he opposed as an Illinois legislator. That act would have provided protection for infants who survived late-term abortions...
The "Born Alive Infants Protection Act" was voted unanimously by the U.S. Senate that same year, and only 15 members of the House opposed it. Obama wasn't in the U.S. Senate in 2002, but he opposed the "Induced Infant Liability Act" as an Illinois legislator.
i dont see ways of "reducing abortions" with out eliminating the right from some women. Perhaps making unsafe sex illegal would "reduce abortions" while preserving the right. or hey! maybe making sex illegal!
Matt 6:14-15(For if you forgive men their offenses, your heavenly father will forgive you also; 15 But if you do not forgive men their offenses, neither will your father forgive your offenses. The reason why you think you are qualified to judge these women is because some how you think your different. You are still a sinner who needs the same blood to cover your sins. Take care to love your neighbor as yourself.
My ex had a abortion when we were together, and it was the greatest thing that happened to me!!!it was awesome! now im not tied to her ass trough child support!
The name of this video is stupid. "Pro-abortion" implies that the person being described PREFERS abortion, when really all they're advocating is the RADICAL idea that a woman's uterus is her own damn business.
NO a Holocaust would be the thousands of ACTUAL people that starve to death and die of AIDS every year. But who cares about them... they're already born, right?
what?? why, because he doesn't fit the cookie cutter mould of what a book says he should be? or what a guy who claims to be an expert of the book tells you it actually means every sunday? riiiight, GOD forbid he think for himself.
excellent fellow
Bumblybee256 2 years ago 2
Sex is popular among middle school and high school students. If abortions were illegal think of all the futures it will ruin. I can't imagine babies raising babies. If abstinence was the solution, think all kids will follow? Sex ed can only go so far too. Many boys want to be a man and many girls want to be women.
scotplaya 3 years ago 7
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Bash the skulls of abortionists into the earth. Bash the skulls of murdering women. No mercy, no boundaries for action!!! Justice is justice. Baby murder is MURDER!!!
Rise up Christendom, rise up in mass force!
AllahConsciousness 3 years ago
I disagree. God is love! Mercy is for everyone!
TolsmaLMC 3 years ago 3
rise up christendom you wonderful fucked up religion! yay for christians, slaughter more people with your nazi pope. fuck you douche bag. PRO ABORTION!
volumeuploud 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
That's not very christian of you, you dumb fucking cunt.
antmartainexperience 3 years ago 3
I was actually really drunk when I posted that shit. I don't even remember posting that in fact. Sorry for the drunken comment. I don't like abortion but alcohol makes the tongue very loose and retarded.
:-)
AllahConsciousness 3 years ago
Haha, fair enough. I was stone cold sober, I just hate christianity.
antmartainexperience 3 years ago
PRO-ABORTION
coreyrussell52 4 years ago
funny thing is he calls himself Catholic!!
bjmdog 4 years ago
SpiderMcCain supports a womans right to choose. SpiderMcCain supports all those who spread freedom, not control.
KngMkeIII 4 years ago
Rudy doesn't respect life. Because if he did he wouldn't be pro-abortion.
DeanClark68 4 years ago
It's that simple eh? If you do not want an abortion than don't have it. Who are you to impose your morals on others? Let people live freely and actually act like an American. Pro-life is anti-freedom.
CalabrezSayZ 4 years ago
Pro-life is pro-freedom. We support LIFE, Liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.
TolsmaLMC 4 years ago
Sweetie, women are citizens. Blobs are NOT. :D
eljagg01 3 years ago
Even though the so-called "blob" has human DNA, and typically has 46 chromosomes?
TolsmaLMC 3 years ago
Um. Yes. Non-sentient physiologically dependent organisms can hardly be considered "citizens".
I doubt the Founders could have DREAMED that would ever be implied. What fetal groups do you know of which wish to congregate? Publish literature? Carry a weapon?
eljagg01 3 years ago
Eljagg01, you think the founders intended abortion to be legal?
TolsmaLMC 3 years ago
I THINK that until the mid 1800's there was absolutely no legislation restricting abortion, and the first laws' wording suggest that concern for the woman's health was the motivating factor...
Since abortion has been practiced for thousands of years, it seems unlikely that our Founders would not know of its existence, and yet not a word about "fetal rights" in any official document anywhere. Could it possibly be that they never imagined abortion rights would ever need LEGAL protection?
eljagg01 3 years ago
I fail to see how this is "pro abortion"
Pro choicers are pro lifers too, they just understand that having a baby isn't for everyone, but generally sex is.
Abortion is a last resort to saving the hypothetical child from being raised by parents (or more likely parent) who just are't (or isn't) ready.
And for the record, all forms of abortion are medically and emotionally SAFER than any pregnancy taken to term. FACT. Look at any reputable statistics report.
malucarlinha 4 years ago
Last I checked, sex results in babies. And for the record, a partial-birth abortion is not safer than delivering that baby, since the baby is virtually delivered during the proceedure.
Gomanson 4 years ago
you have no idea what you're talking about. And if you're a man, you have no right to even be angry about aborted fetuses. Not only can you not even produce one, you dont have to see or care for or even think twice about the fetuses that were or were not aborted.
malucarlinha 4 years ago
I have the right to be angry about whatever I want, and so do you and everyone else.
What you've stated here isn't an argument, so I can't really respond.
Gomanson 4 years ago
Thats because abortion is a non issue, there's nothing to argue about. Women will do it whether men bitch about it or not.
If i were you I'd stop moaning about it and focus on real world problems.
malucarlinha 4 years ago
Partial birth abortion is not safer than regular abortions, but it is just as safe as a regular birth. ESPECIALLY these days where most of the world has c-sections or needs contraction inducing drugs to start the labor. Just as safe, I assure you.
malucarlinha 4 years ago
Sorry I replied on my husbands account.
malucarlinha 4 years ago
"Pro-abortion"?
You mean... pro-women-owning-their-bodies-not-the-government-in-keeping-with-common-sense??
Right.
eljagg01 4 years ago
Women own their bodies; not their unborn children's.
Gomanson 4 years ago
abortions save lives kinda. i think that personally if you have a babby any time during being a teenager, your life is over. its wrecked you have no fuckng hope. all your dreams n shit you can cry away because your new life is taking care of a mistake. abortions can give you a second chance. yes killing babies is wrong... so in the end
dont be a fool wrap your tool
markchisholm 4 years ago
cheers!
malucarlinha 4 years ago
and if abortion is never made illegal, then they should at least be allowed to use the stem cells
smokeweedeveryday815 4 years ago
damn, this dude did so much for new york on 9/11, it sucks that he supports killing babies, how does he live with himself?
smokeweedeveryday815 4 years ago
then stop fornicating, its no ones fault they were silly to fall pregnant. I dont care about the woman's right, the moment she laid down to have sex she lost that right. The baby dont have to pay with his life, for his/her mother's lack of self control, giving into all sexual lust or feelings
Micolo2225 4 years ago
SEE: abortionfactsDOTcom and gargaroDOTcom These abortionists are even selling these poor babies body parts on the market. What barbarians we have in the world.
lgedbmt 4 years ago
all the pro abortion supporters, should imagine if them or their children would have been aborted,and see what difference that would have made
Micolo2225 4 years ago
I bet you the first to talk shit about the women who can't support their children. You people are so gung ho to prevent abortions but your no where when those women need finacial and emotional help.
PinkDiamond56 4 years ago
and its better to kill the children they cant support? do you think the aborted children want that of their lives?
smokeweedeveryday815 4 years ago
It better for you to also make the men in their lives take resposibility to be the one who pressured them into having one. Trust me it is against a womans nature to kill her own children. Unless there is something wrong with you of course. But 1st of all the procedure is very painfull and the woman who has one spend the rest of her days on earth regreting this decision. Trust me women who get abortions are not as heartless as you people think
PinkDiamond56 4 years ago
im sure theyre not, i just dont agree with killing something that has the potential to become successful in life, and if abortion is gonna be legal, then stem cells shuld be legal also
smokeweedeveryday815 4 years ago
So... POTENTIAL takes precedence over the ACTUAL? How absurd.
eljagg01 4 years ago
I have two children.
Abortion has nothing to do with children.
And the FETUSES are non-sentient, so I doubt they "want" anything.
eljagg01 4 years ago 2
Abortion has something to do with children in that it ends the life of one. A fetus is a nacent live human being, and has the rights that live humans are given. Sentience is not a prerequisite for human rights. And even if it were, is a one-day-old baby any more sentient than it was a day before it was born?
Think your position through before making assertions.
Gomanson 4 years ago
ABORTION IS A NON ISSUE. What difference does it make to you if I or my friends or any woman in this country or in this world get an an abortion? Zero. Women will continue to abort whether it's legal or not- the only difference is that less full grown women with lives and families will die if abortion stays a SAFE, LEGAL PROCEDURE.
Think about YOUR position before making assertions.
malucarlinha 4 years ago
What difference it makes is that as I've stated above, every abortion destroys a human life. You're right that women will have abortions whether it's legal or not, but this certainly doesn't justify it. Rape will occur whether it is legal or not, but we all agree that rape is bad and shouldn't happen.
Gomanson 4 years ago
I still fail to see how it affects you in any way.
malucarlinha 4 years ago
Whether or not abortion affects me has no bearing on whether or not it is wrong. Genocide in Africa doesn't affect me, but I can still speak out against it. The same is true for abortion.
Gomanson 4 years ago
Yes, but who decides what is indeed right or wrong? You? God?
Genocide in Africa is completely different because the humans that are murdered there are already fully developed, independent creatures, with lives and families and responsibilities. That infringes on a already widely accepted human right only because they are fully developed, independent creatures, with lives and families and responsibilities.
chaaalieboy 4 years ago
A fetus is a potential human. Until a little past the 2nd trimester of after, it is little more than a parasite, that would not, under any circumstance, survive without the mother. No science can save a fetus born before the 3rd trimester. Not to mention fetuses dont even feel pain until the third semester. I'm not saying I'm necessarily against 3rd trimester abortions, because I'd rather save the mother than save the potential baby, but I think they should and can be avoided.
chaaalieboy 4 years ago
You think fetuses are little more than parasites? I wonder what percentage of doctors would agree to that statement. The truth is that the fetus can feel pain long before the third trimester begins.
TolsmaLMC 4 years ago
I'm going to stop arguing with you because I could beat you over the head with the facts and you'd still be as stubborn as an ass, and it's really not my problem buster.
I hope you get a vasectomy before ever trying to stop a woman you know from getting an abortion.
chaaalieboy 4 years ago
No. I'm sorry. A "child", by definition, does not live on, inside of, or attached to a person.
"nacent"?
Also, a "being" is usually defined as a sentient organism.
Sentience is NOT a "prerequisite for human rights", it is a prerequisite for all rights. It holds that in a moral system based on elimination of suffering, the right to be protected from suffering is proportional to one's ability TO suffer. :)
A one day old baby is NOT dependent on someone's body, is it? :D
eljagg01 3 years ago
Then you would be against Barrack Obama. He voted against the "Born Alive Infants Protection Act". This act simply said that any child who survives an abortion (fully born) should be provided medical care and treated like a human being. Barrack Obama voted against it in 2002. What are your thoughts on that? Just being curious.
TolsmaLMC 3 years ago
From what I can find on the text of that Act, it seems to me to be common sense, although I hesitate to applaud it because I can't find much on its application since its passage. Also, from what I could find, the Senate passed it unanimously. Where did you read that Obama voted against it?
eljagg01 3 years ago
Sorry, I meant the "Induced Infant Liability Act" which he opposed as an Illinois legislator. That act would have provided protection for infants who survived late-term abortions...
The "Born Alive Infants Protection Act" was voted unanimously by the U.S. Senate that same year, and only 15 members of the House opposed it. Obama wasn't in the U.S. Senate in 2002, but he opposed the "Induced Infant Liability Act" as an Illinois legislator.
TolsmaLMC 3 years ago
Ah.
eljagg01 3 years ago
i dont see ways of "reducing abortions" with out eliminating the right from some women. Perhaps making unsafe sex illegal would "reduce abortions" while preserving the right. or hey! maybe making sex illegal!
you reduce abortions and keep the rights.
and you cant be BOTH pro- and anti-choice.
MMalve 4 years ago
who woman who murders a baby with abortion should be given the death penalty !
bigmac2005 4 years ago
i hate abortion too, but please dont be insane, its not cool
smokeweedeveryday815 4 years ago
Matt 6:14-15(For if you forgive men their offenses, your heavenly father will forgive you also; 15 But if you do not forgive men their offenses, neither will your father forgive your offenses. The reason why you think you are qualified to judge these women is because some how you think your different. You are still a sinner who needs the same blood to cover your sins. Take care to love your neighbor as yourself.
PinkDiamond56 4 years ago
uhh did i say anything irrational? in fact i was saying it to the asshole who was, so fuck you
smokeweedeveryday815 4 years ago
Ha ha ha can't take it but you sure can dish it out. Why don't you go smoke some more you loser.Oh while your at it grow a pair nancy
PinkDiamond56 4 years ago
He wants to limit abortion but is pro-choice. You cant be both Rudy.
DeanClark68 4 years ago
My ex had a abortion when we were together, and it was the greatest thing that happened to me!!!it was awesome! now im not tied to her ass trough child support!
ssjautobot 4 years ago
in other hand you have your soul trapped in this crime!!!
sjrodovalho 4 years ago
awesome! sweet
ssjautobot 4 years ago
Rudy the Apostate.
Rudy the Heretic.
Rudy the soon to be Excommunicated advocate for infant-murder.
WizardWhateley 4 years ago
I want to vote for Rudy now! He better stay that way if he is elected to office.
Olenkatastrophe 4 years ago
The name of this video is stupid. "Pro-abortion" implies that the person being described PREFERS abortion, when really all they're advocating is the RADICAL idea that a woman's uterus is her own damn business.
eljagg01 4 years ago
This is holocaust!
Fubeli 4 years ago
NO a Holocaust would be the thousands of ACTUAL people that starve to death and die of AIDS every year. But who cares about them... they're already born, right?
eljagg01 4 years ago
a man with brain
cemoaytac 4 years ago
Rudy the pseudo-Catholic
statnerd52 4 years ago
what?? why, because he doesn't fit the cookie cutter mould of what a book says he should be? or what a guy who claims to be an expert of the book tells you it actually means every sunday? riiiight, GOD forbid he think for himself.
cabinfevrr 4 years ago