Don't care about obese people, but smoking, it effects other people. If your obese its not like contagious but other people have to breathe in someone else's tar smoke...
The part about all the food we have in America and the toxins and all that, that is one thing that one has to admit is true. We have a lot of food and are so used to being luxury and spoiled, compared to other countries, and the food we have has so much crap in it. No wonder we get cancer....
how is being fat a personal problem i mean i guess you have to deal with it on a personal level mentally, but if being fat is personal, then being gay is personal!
Thanks for uploading this, @librarien! I was never a big Bill Maher fan but recently, with all of the Christine O'Donnell hoopla, even as a young Canadian, I find his commentary interesting, and his panel oftentimes (on Real Time nowadays) hilarious and informative.
Milk is just nasty, and its really weird that humans still drink it into adulthood. The biggest claim is that it;s a good source of calcium....well if you learn about it...the cows milk has so much calcium from the grass that it eats. Skip the milk and just eat green leafy veggies and your fine. People just need to think logically and do some research and stop listing to opinions and follow actual fact.
Bill Maher has it pretty wrong on milk. Sure, drinking a lot of milk is bad for you, but in moderation, it is perfectly fine and healthy. Plus, who gives a fuck what other people put into their bodies? It's thier choices.
The ONLY time you should drink milk is if you are trying to ingest large amounts of fat and vitamins like calcium. For instance, if you lift weights a lot you should drink a little milk every now and then. Other than that, don't touch the stuff, it will kill you deader than a hammer.
The only analogy I can think of is it is like diesel fuel, it packs a wallop but if you use it in an engine that isn't primed for it then it will ruin it.
so you're telling me that all these abnormalities are caused by milk? most of these things could be caused by other factors much more than with milk.
Also, just because no other animal does it doesn't mean it's unnatural. humans are the only creatures to walk upright on two legs and wear clothing covering our bodies. I don't see Bill Mahr saying let's walk on all fours and go around naked because it's 'unnatural' to wear clothes. Man, no one can have fun with food anymore...
Dude, Bif Naked was around way before "Lady Gaga". The comparison would be the other way around, although I'd be hard pressed to want to make that comparison.
and btw, the economic crisis began WAY before Obama was even in office, it was caused by the retard before him who decided to invade Iraq and spend billions upon billions of dollars (a war that everyone admits was a tactical error and was probagated through a lie), and because of the unrestrained free market economy where greedy assholes fucked everyone else over. Obama's spending was necessary to fix a problem that he inhereted
Son, you don't even understand a subject that you've studied in college, don't try to fuck with me in Economics.
Bush had zip to do with the Economic Crisis. It was Clinton who repealed Glass-Steagall and doubled down on CRA, Carter signed CRA, Barney Frank, Chris Dodd, Franklin Reigns, etc. all Democrats were in charge of the oversight of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.
Too much debt was mounted by CRA and repealing Glass Steagall allowed the Freddie and Fannie to trade the derivatives.
Obama's spending is necessary for shit, he's creating the next economic crisis, which will either be high inflation or high interest rates like we had in the 1970s.
You can't borrow, spend, tax as much as you want w/o consequences. Either the dollar will collapse or the dollar will come back, but it will take high interest rates to repair the damage Obama has done to the value of it.
Variations in solar output have been the cause of past climate changes, but solar forcing is thought to be too small to account for a significant part of global warming in recent decades.
Greenhouse gases and solar forcing affect temperatures in different ways. While both increased solar activity and increased greenhouse gases are expected to warm the troposphere, an increase in solar activity should warm the stratosphere while an increase in greenhouse gases should cool the stratosphere. Observations show that temperatures in the stratosphere have been steady or cooling since 1979. Radiosonde data from the pre-satellite era show cooling since 1958.
global surface temperature is likely to rise a further 1.1 to 6.4 °C (2.0 to 11.5 °F) during the 21st century. Some other uncertainties include how warming and related changes will vary from region to region around the globe. Most studies focus on the period up to the year 2100. However, warming is expected to continue beyond 2100 even if emissions stop, because of the large heat capacity of the oceans and the long lifetime of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere
@plaguelandscapes LMFAO. Warming will continue beyond 2100? Buddy, you're just digging the hole deeper. Hey, why don't you do like James Hansen did and make a prediction of when Manhattan will go under water due to rising sea levels.
He said in 1988 it would go under by 1998 and here we are in 2010 and we still have Manhattan. LMFAO.
YES, the temperature will continue to increase beyond that point even if we adopt strong measures, (which we dont seem to be doing) because of the large heat capacities of the ocean and the long lifetime of CO2 that will remain in the atmosphere.
And you are still refering to ONE prediction by ONE person ONE time, you connot deny the factual consensus of all respectable scientists and all academies throughout the world
An increase in global temperature will cause sea levels to rise and will change the amount and pattern of precipitation, probably including expansion of subtropical deserts.[7] Warming will be strongest in the Arctic and will be associated with continuing retreat of glaciers, permafrost and sea ice. Other likely effects include increases in the intensity of extreme weather events, species extinctions, and changes in agricultural yields.
"The IPCC also concludes that variations in natural phenomena such as solar radiation and volcanism produced most of the warming from pre-industrial times to 1950 and had a small cooling effect afterward.[2][3] These basic conclusions have been endorsed by more than 40 scientific societies and academies of science,[B] including all of the national academies of science of the major industrialized countries."
"The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) concludes that most of the observed temperature increase since the middle of the 20th century was caused by increasing concentrations of greenhouse gases resulting from human activity such as fossil fuel burning and deforestation."
THIS IS A FACT THAT NO SCIENTIFIC ORGANIZATION REFUTES
"You can go suck Mark Levin's dick and then give sean hannity a rimjob" - plaguelandscapes
Thanks for admitting defeat. Good luck with your Muscle Atrophying Diet and your Not-So-Smart Car. You may not be saving the planet, but as long as you feel that you are, that's what counts at the end of the day, I guess.
You're a good Democrat and Uncle Barry will be counting on you in 2012, of course by then, you might be the only one he truly could count on.
Your argument is WRONG and you wont admit it, you just contnue to blame everything on liberal and socialist conspiracies and scientific facts that you call "garbage" when in fact they have been tested and verified, so your argument has absolutely no standing
I would love to hear your alternative theories (if you had any at all)
It's not a conspiracy, it's a damn fact. You don't think there is a movement in our Government to Socialize this country and do things behind our backs? Where the hell have you been? They are trying to pass a Health Care bill behind closed doors after Obama promised to air the discussions 8 times on CSPAN. So please, don't lecture me about conspiracies when there are facts on the table.
I don't have theories, I base my argument and opinion on reality. I told you the Sun is the major cause.
The Sun is NOT the major cause look at any scientific evidence throughout every science academy throughout the world, look at the graphs, PLEASE just look at the data, i dont know why you wont take it seriously, everything is not a socialist conspiracy, besides, implementing some socialist policies will not be the end of the world look at every other industrialized nation in the world, they have all adopted socialist policies, we are NOT falling into soviet russia like you think
We have enough Socialist Policies in this country and we have a 12 Trillion Dollar National Debt as a result of these God Damn Socialist Policies. We have a Federal Reserve, Welfare, a bankrupted Social Security, and Massive Spending as a result of the Socialism we already have.
No thanks, we don't need anymore Socialism.
The Govt is taking over the Car Companies, Banks, Health Care, Oil, capping Salaries, what the hell do you call this shit? I call it Soviet Russia. This ain't America.
Look a every other industrialized nation, they all adopt socialist policies
Austrialia is not experiencing a recession like we are, France has the best heathcare system in the world and is the most environmentally frienldy, Canada also has a better healthcare system than we do
@plaguelandscapes LMFAO. Canada, France, and Australia? Tell me something, why do Canadians leave their country to get their health care in America? Why do Canadian Doctors prefer to practice in America? Why does Canada suffer from a little problem like Doctor Shortages?
Don't get me started on France, where they pay 60% of their income in taxes and 48% in taxes in Canada plus, they pay VAT taxes on top of it.
If America is inferior to these countries, why do you live in it? LMFAO.
FRANCE-best healthcare SYSTEM, and independant of foreign oil
I live in America becasue I love America and want to re-establish the principles that it was FOUNDED on, and i am embarressed that we have fallen so far from the secular principles that we were founded on. YOU are anit-American becasue you deny reason, logic and empirical understanding, every one of the founding fathers would be rolling over in their gaves if they know that YOU were an American
@plaguelandscapes We have a recession in America b/c we have a Socialist Goon in the White House who is raising taxes and spending more money we don't even have in the midst of a financial crisis.
Who said America was founded on Secular Principles? It was founded on Judeo-Christian Values. Congress traditionally opened a session with a prayer.
Yes, I am Anti-American, I should be more American like you and praise countries like Canada and France over America, that would American of me. LMAO
It's founded on the principles of the Christian and Jewish religions, not on the religions themselves per se.
Jefferson was a Unitarian, not an Atheist. He was a proponent of Religious Freedom, not Separation of Church and State.
Separation of Church and State is NOT our First Amendment. The First Amendment says Congress shall pass no law recognizing the Establishment of Religion. This means, for example, the Catholic Church cannot run our Congress, not removing God from everything.
A Volcanic Eruption is more detrimental to the environment than just about any human activity. The only human activity that I could think of that might destroy the environment is nuclear warfare.
I agree with you here but it is beside the point because volcanism casuses global cooling and has prevented the earth from warming more than it has this century and the environemnt WILL be destroyed through desertification and drought in some areas, as well as the shifting of agricultural belts, it will affect PEOPLE
Rising average temperatures are already affecting the environment. Some observed changes include shrinking of glaciers, thawing of permafrost, later freezing and earlier break-up of ice on rivers and lakes, lengthening of growing seasons, shifts in plant and animal ranges and earlier flowering of trees
Buddy, this shit was going on before man ever drove their first car. At one time, the entire world was practically a glacier. We've had continental divides, we've had shifts in tectonic plates, we've seen seasons grow and shrink, earlier flowering of trees and later flowering of trees. There is no ideal climate or weather.
So keep avoiding meat and keep driving your smart car and let's see where that gets you. You can't control the Climate.
The bottom line is when you disrupt the balance of nature it has detrimental effects we add 37.9 billion tons of CO2 into the atmosphere that is not meant to be there, obviously it is going to acellerate the greenhouse effect, you say that that we have cut down CO2 emmissions when we acutally havent, I aknowledge that the earth goes through cycles but not at the accelleration that is happening today because of humans
Who are you to determine what is meant to be there or not? We live on the Earth and we use it. We don't pollute nearly as much as we used to in the past. China is the problem, with their air being dirtier than an asshole.
Honestly, if we're going to put a stop to this, we would have to legalize murder, have as many wars as possible, encourage more abortions, drug more people to death, legalize assisted suicide, and destroy as many factories and factory jobs as possible.
I agree that as China and India become more industrialized they will contribute far more CO2 emmisssion to the atmosphere becasue the only fuel source that they have is coal( the dirtiest energy source) and the fact that they have far more people than we do;
what you said about legalizing murder, assited suicide ect..is rediculous all we need is more investment in alternative energy sources and fuel efficiency, thats all im asking for
I'm for alternative energy sources as well, but when the markets dictate it, we will have it. Govt can't force us in that direction, the people must demand it themselves with their money.
Government has to dictate funding for alternative energy sources because the Amercian population is too uneducated to realize the threat that global climate change presents to the world Just look at our literacy rates and our amount of science degree graduates; it is far behind the rest of the world, and people continue to buy SUV's and make other poor choices
I just want to pound it home that temperature has NOT been decreasing in the last decade, who is telling you this?
Yes, we are too uneducated and ignorant to buy into Global Warming, that's it. LMFAO.
Who has to tell me that the temperatures have been decreasing in the last decade? Alls one has to do is open their fuckin' eyes and pay attention and could see it for themselves. Everyone knows it's been decreasing this last decade, that's why the majority of people now think Global Warming is bullshit.
We've had snow in Michigan in fuckin' May in this last decade, never happened once in the 1990s or 80s.
You dont understand science or else you would agree with me
Its not a matter of buying into global warming it is 100% fact and if you disagree you might as well disagree that the earth is round and that evolution is fact and you STILL are not understanding the concept that Global warming casues Climate CHANGE and that it will affect the climate of areas differetly, of course I would expect that the climate would be weird when it shouldnt be, you proved my point
@plaguelandscapes The climate is weird and has changed since the dawn of time. You're the one who might as well believe the Earth is flat if you believe in Man-Made Global Warming, you dunce cap. You have no understanding that the sun is the number 1 factor of our climate, you God damn fool, that's why the climate is different near the equator than it is near the arctic, and different by a lot too i might add.
The climate HAS changed before i've aknowledged this 1000 times, that is not the problem, the problem is that it is changing too fast and we dont have the time to adapt to it, and ONCE AGAIN the sun is NOT the major factor when solar output has decreased in recent years, YOU ADMITTED THIS, so the cause for Global warming IS man made because carbon emmissions are geenhouse gasses and when they increase by almost 40% because of industrialization the temperature is obviously going to increase
I looked at the evidence, boy. It has trended downwards in the last 8 - 10 years. From Dec. 2000 to Nov. 2009, it has decreased by 1.3 degrees Fahrenheit.
You didn't say increased, you said humans account for 40% of carbon emissions on the planet and I corrected you and said, it's less than 4% of our total carbon emissions.
You are just to ideological and think that everything is a conspiracy and wont admit when you are wrong,
I want to know where you are getting your information becasue it CANNOT be a reputable source if it says that humans are not responsible for Global Warming
You're ideological if you think there is some ideal climate for every location on the planet where it has to rain a certain amount and temperatures have to be consistent each year.
The information I get is all over the internet and it's common sense written in science books and talking to people who know more about this topic than you or I do.
I said that climate is unpredictable, I have said before that daily weather patterns are averaged to show the enitre climate change on the macro level
The information you get cannot possibly be written in science books you believe in pseudo-science
Science is constantly changing and revising, newer books have more uptdated theories and information, I know your going to blame it on liberal and socialist biased that you think exist in every part of our society, but this is simply not the case and it is your neo-conservative philosophjy that is enslaving your mind and warping your interpretation of basic scientific facts
Neo-Conservative? A Neo-Con is a Jew, I'm not a Jew and I didn't become a Conservative b/c I support Israel like a group of Jews did.
I understand the books have to be updated, but while they are being updated, they are rewriting history at the same time. The science is updating, but the facts are also being distorted. Unlike you, I don't just swallow it whole, I pick it apart and filter out the garbage.
I was using Neo-con as an abriviation to use less charaters, Im not swallowing anything whole I dont just read text books I do my own research, I study science it is my life, you already admitted to me that you dont have a degree in science
so why are you even arguing with me? I obviously know more about the climate cycles of the earth than you do, you are arguing a positon that does not even exist and has been refuted by countless facts that I have presented over and over again
I don't have a degree in science, but that doesn't mean I don't know shit about science, I know enough to make a common sense argument and opinion and have backed it up with facts.
I'm aware of the facts you presented before we even engaged in this discussion, and I have told you, that a 1.33 degree increase over 100 years is hysteria.
You obviously dont know anything about geoscience because if you did you would realize the threat that that increase in temperature has over that short amount of time, then you would realize how serious a problem that climate change has become
If we continue the way that we are, the temperature will increase by at least (2-11 degrees F)
The problem is the rate at which this is happening, and it is not natural phenomena, every single academy of science in the world contends that the earth is warming and humans contributing CO2 to the atmosphere is the cause
This is not a "controversial issue" its scientific fact
You're not making a good case here, you're saying that b/c every single academy of science in the world contends that the earth is warming automatically makes it a fact.
Consensus is not a FACT.
At one time, if anyone disagreed that the Earth was Flat, they were deemed crazy, b/c the CONSENSUS at one time was that the Earth was FLAT.
I know consensus is not a fact I made that point before regarding when most PEOPLE dont agree, but when every scientist has studied this and found irrefutable evidence, EVIDENCE, NOT OPINION, and even average people can observe the effects of climate change ( I have noticed that certain birds in the area where I live have changed their migration patterns, and certain species of flowers bloom at strange times) then consensus among scientists is correct
Nobody is disputing the fact that the climate is changing, the dispute is whether humans are causing it or not. There are scientists who don't believe that man is causing the climate to change. At one time, we had pangea and then the continental divides, that caused climates to change.
Al Gore and the scientists who push Global Warming won't even debate Lord Monckton. Monckton isn't even a scientist, and these guys are too scared to debate him. If the truth was on their side, they would.
Exactly, he's not a scientist, they dont debate him becasue it would be meaningless, humans ARE causing this, the sun is NOT causing global warming becasue there is data that shows that solar output to earth has been decreasing since the 1980s, there are countless graphs by NASA that show this, humans put 37.9 Billion tons of CO2 in the atmosphere every year, of course this accellerates the greenhouse effect and of course it will affect the climate
He's not a scientist, but he is very knowledgeable in the topic. If he was not a threat, why did they drown him out with protests and ranting in Copenhagen, rather than let him give his speech?
NASA gets their graphs from those fraud scientists involved in Climate Gate and their as Left Wing an organization as they come. They manipulate the data to push an agenda.
They want us all paying Carbon Taxes to the New World Order. Stop trusting this Government and start thinking for yourself.
He's not a climate scientist so he is not knowledgable on the topic he was the Glenn Beck show, everything he says about the climate is irrelavent becasue he wrong like you are, there is no debate about this because it is factAnd i think if any scientific organization is qualified to give data regarding the Earth it would be NASA. If anyone doesnt trust the governemtn its me, I dont care about what the governement says about Global Warming becasue they are backed by lobbyists in the oil industry
Actually you do trust the Government, and you are pushing their garbage and you don't even know it. You don't care what they say about Global Warming, b/c you trust the Govt.
I do doubt the greenhouse effect even exists or it's so damn negligible, it's a shame we are even discussing it and blowing it up into such a controversial issue.
With the atmosphere and surface area of the Earth as large as it is and the CO2 levels at .038% and Water Vapors making up less than 1% of the Earth's Atmosphere, you honestly believe there is some Greenhouse Effect? Be serious.
This is a hoax to pass a worldwide Carbon Tax and create a One World Government at Copenhagen.
If the greenhouse effect did not exist our planet would not be habitable, the greenhouse effect was discovered in 1824, it 2009, its rediculous im even arguing that it exists
Carbon Dioxide contributes 9-26% of the greenhouse effect
The greenhouse effect in moderation keeps our planet relatively warm, but a an acelleration in the greenhouse effect, which is what is happening now is causing more radiative forcing than whats sustainable
I didn't say the Greenhouse Effect doesn't exist, I said it's negligible. Water Vapors contribute 95% of the Greenhouse Effect. The U.S. Energy Department doesn't even recognize Water Vapor as a Greenhouse Effect. Human Beings contribute about 3.5% to all the Carbon Dioxide on the Earth. Very small and negligible.
You said that you "doubt it even exists", and it is not negligable, its the driving force that keeps our planet warm and habitable, and the introduction of any surplus of greenhouse gasses will accellerate the process and lead to warming because of the absorption of more UV rays
The sun is the driving force of keeping the planet warm and habitable. Greenhouse gases would be worthless if we had no sun or the sun became too powerful.
Yes, solar output has decreased in recent years and so have the temperatures. We are in the midst of an Arctic Blast in the United States. It snowed in Houston, TX this year for Christ's sake.
Again, the temperatures have not decreased, they have increased by 1.33 degrees F, the information that you are getting is from a wrong, biased source, and once again, its climate CHANGE brought about by overall global warming; some places will become colder, some warmer, some will get more precipitation and others less. Its not one uniform occurance, the climate system is complex and unpredictable
You're talking about temperatures increasing over 100 years, I'm talking about temperatures decreasing over the last decade. I already told you that we peaked between 1998 - 2001 in warming temperatures. You cannot honestly tell me that 2009 was a warmer year than 1998 otherwise, you're flat out lying.
Climate Change is such crap, it's called the weather. Some years are warmer than others and rain more than others. Is there really such a thing as an Ideal Climate? LMFAO.
The Rise in temperature is irreverable even if the temperature has decreased in the last decade (which it hasnt) the heat is still ratained in the ocean becasue water has a high specific heat and through thermohaline circulation and ocean currents, is tranported throughout the world and the heat is distributed
I said the oceans have no effect on our climate? LMFAO. Putting words in your opponent's mouth means you lost this argument.
You're claiming now that all the Global Warming is in the Ocean so we can't see it, when you've been ranting and raving about how its effecting temperatures and life on the land.
Thats what you implied. You were trivializing the effect that the oceans have on our climate, and that is not what I said, what I said is that the oceans retain heat becasue water has a high specific heat and of course the temperature of the oceans has an effect on the temperature of the and which once again proves that you know NOTHING about the climate and have no understanding of geoscience
I wasn't trivializing anything, you were going off topic like you usually do and I was mocking you for it.
The topic is CO2, where the fuck does the Ocean come into this? Either you're going to build your case that man is creating enough CO2 to change the climate or walk away.
No, based on what you said you were making a joke of it just to somehow make what I said irrelavent, and I wasnt going off topic becasue the ocean obviously has an effect on the climate becasue the heat absorbed by the CO2 as a result of the greenhouse effect will then be store as heat enregy in the ocean, making the warming irreversable,
You dont understand the complex climate systems, everything has an effect on everything else
We have definately not been cooling in the last t 10 years you have been obtaining wrong information look at any graph by the EPA, NOAA or the IPCC that shows the climb in temperature that has existsted since the begining of the century
The climate IS a complex system that involves many cycles working together; Im not making it more complicated, it already is a complicated system but the things that are affecting it are not that difficult to understand
Anybody with common sense and is actually paying attention can see for themselves that the temps have been cooling this last decade. The EPA is worthless and nothing more than the arm of the Govt and Govt just wants control.
The temps have not been cooling you stil dont understand, The EPA has implemented more plans to protect the environment and the American people than any organization in the history of mankind so do not lecture me in the insignificance of this organization , we would have a much more dirtier and unhealthy society if it wasnt for them; you as an American citizen own more to them than you know or could possibly realize just simply look up the initiatives implemented by the EPA in American histor
How bout the EPA can kiss my ass. I don't owe them shit, alls they do is regulate what I can do on my own God damn property and drive up my taxes.
The EPA now has the power to pass Crap N Tax if Congress doesn't.
Fuck those Hippie Fascists. I hope the next Republican President is a Conservative and completely eliminates the EPA, b/c that is one bureaucracy we sure as hell don't need. I know Ron Paul would kick their asses to the curb.
I would expect you to say that about the EPA 1955 - Air Pollution Control Act PL 84-159 1963 - Clean Air Act PL 88-206 1965 - Motor Vehicle Air Pollution Control Act PL 89-272 1966 - Clean Air Act Amendments PL 89-675 1967 - Air Quality Act PL 90-148 1969 - National Environmental Policy Act PL 91-190 1970 - Clean Air Act Extension PL 91-604 1976 - Toxic Substances Control Act PL 94-469 1977 - Clean Air Act Amendments PL 95-95 1990 - Clean Air Act Amendments PL 101-549
@plaguelandscapes Yes, and all these regulations, what have they given us? We still emit more CO2 than ever, according to your studies. Good job EPA! LMFAO.
What regulation of CO2? what are you talking about? We still emit 37.9 billion tons of CO2 in the atmosphere each year not to mention that fact that we are cutting down the rainforest and less trees exist to abosrb the CO2 in the atmosphere, none of the regualtions exist because the lobbyists that work for the oil companies do not want them to exist because it would mean less money THERE IS NO MONEY IN CONSERVATION, thats why we dont implement plans to curb CO2 emmisions
@plaguelandscapes Ok, so if we ban oil companies from drilling in more places, what do you think this will do to the supply and price? You want to pay $10 / gallon of gas? Keep putting regulations on where oil companies can drill, question is if you can afford it.
You want to tax oil companies more? Go ahead, they'll just pass it on to the consumer. Either way, the oil companies win, they'll still make money at $4 / gallon or $10 / gallon, it's the ppl who are effected.
Im not saying that we ban oil companies you are putting words in my mouth, I said That I think it is reprehensible that they have so much influence on our government
I want more investment in alternative energy sources and to improve fuel efficiency for the time being, and for people to stop being retarted and stop driving SUV's( and I dont drive a smart car you idiot, they dont even get that good of gas mileage) Nothing is a better form of transportation than my legs.
There are a lot of things being put in your mouth, words are not what I have in mind.
What influence do the oil companies have on Obama and Nancy Pelosi?
If you want alternative energy, you have to create a market for them. You want people to stop driving SUVs, create a market for something better than an SUV.
You should love high gas prices, that's a great way to reduce the number of people driving SUVs.
What good are your legs as a form of transportation when there's snow and ice?
You didn't prove shit, I knew all this, my case was, it has more to do with the power of the sun and the Greenhouse Effect is purely crap. Mars has a small atmosphere and doesn't retain heat well, but Earth, which has a big atmosphere doesn't retain heat well either. It's the sun that is what is causing the changes, stupid.
The lowest temperture ever recorded on Earth was -90 degrees C and on Mars it was -123 degrees C and can get as low as -146 degrees C, what more do you need?
Thus far, I've gotten you to admit that CO2 is not the only factor that affects the Climate, which is a start. Most Leftists wouldn't even take it this level. As you admitted, atmosphere plays a role as well, and now we also have to admit, the sun plays the most fundamental role in determining the temperature of each planet. When you get down to it, CO2 is small potatoes, it's negligible, it makes up less than .04% of our atmosphere. That is the point I was driving.
The sun is the most determinant of our temperatures, not CO2 levels. You're trying to draw a direct correlation and you're failing miserably, CO2 levels have been going down even with the planet increasing in temperature.
Have you looked at the Climate Gate Charts? Those Scientists (who publicly pushed Global Warming just like you) had the real data in their emails and it showed the temperatures moving up and down significantly while the CO2 was continuously rising.
I have read up on that, it doesnt change anything, that was one group of scientists, the dependacne on information from any one set of research results is very very small compared to the overwhelming body of knowledge regarding the climate, not one scientific organization has changed their position becasue there is OVERWHELMING evidence, and besides disagreements among scientists is what moves science forward, the email distort the actual data and minimize the importance of this issue
Well, it should make you think about trusting Government Sources like you seem to do when they disregard important facts.
The Scientists had the real data and they were distorting it and presenting it to the public. They were adding 1500 degrees to the data. It's distortion and deception.
Im not trusting government sources, I have an understanding of how earths climate system works becasue I have devoted my life to it, I read reputable scientific journals from the worlds most respected scintists and academies throughout the world, the information that I obtain is not false becasue it has been tested and verified again and again
And it is still ONE group of scientists, which is insignificant compared to the actual EVIDENCE that had been obtained and still remains unrefuted
If you look at the most respected scientists and economists in the world, they are all pushing Global Warming and Socialism. George Soros is regarded as a highly respected economist, but alls he is really is a damn money changer.
Academia and most organizations are run by the Socialist Elite and they censor anyone who doesn't agree with them either by turning them into persona nongrata or trashing them.
Your evidence is very refutable and there has been evidence to disprove it.
No, everything that I said is 100% fact, its the way the climate works, I refuted everything that you said, your main argument was that the sun was contributing to global warming, which it isnt, so you are wrong, humans are the ones responsible for the climate changing.
you also believed that people breathing crontributed to global warming, this is not true what so ever so that tells me you have no understanding of anything related to global warming
LMFAO. You haven't refuted a God damn thing and you agreed with me that the Sun is the biggest contributor for our temperatures on this planet, who the hell are you fooling?
If you're going to say that Carbon Dioxide is the biggest contributor to Global Warming, then people breathing does contribute to Global Warming, b/c we exhale Carbon Dioxide. You can try to spin it all you want, but Carbon Dioxide is Carbon Dioxide, whether we exhale it or emit it from machines. Case closed.
I HAVE refuted everything you said you just wont admit it or are too stupid to understand, and you must be if you honestly believe that people breathing contributes to Global warming
IT DOESNT WORK THAT WAY, I have already explained this, if you took any time to do any serious research on this you would see that i'm right
LMFAO. Hey Einstein, I don't believe people breathing contributes to Global Warming, I am saying, you believe that if you believe that CO2 is having as big an effect as you claim it does. CO2 is CO2, doesn't matter how it is emitted.
Yes it does matter how it is emmitted because when people breath out CO2 it is absobed back into the enviroment through feedback loops becasue it is such a negligable amount as opposed to when you emmit it into the atmosphere in large quantities like we have been doing in the past century
Dont you think its odd that in the one
century that we have been using fossil fuels that we have seen the largest temperature spike in the shortest amount of time in the last 20 million years
The environment absorbs it all whether in large or small quantities. The Earth is capable of healing itself. The quantity we emit is shit compared to a Volcanic Eruption and the Earth is perfectly capable of absorbing the Eruptions.
Largest Temperature Spike in the last 20 Million Years? 1 Degree over 100 years is the largest spike? Give me a fuckin' break. Could a 1 degree increase in Global Temperatures end an Ice Age? We've had 6 - 7 of those.
Its actually 1.33 degrees and volcanism has nothing to do with what is happening right now except for the fact that it has prevented further warming in this century im not sure why you keep bringing that up, it doesnt make any point at all. You still underestimate the effect that 1.33 degrees has on the environment, which again proves that you know nothing about the climate of the Earth
You know why I underestimate 1.33 degrees? B/c if the temperature was 64 degrees today and 62.77 degrees tomorrow, I still wouldn't feel the damn difference.
In my state, the temperature varies by 90 - 100 degrees each year. It ranges from -10 - 0 low and 90 - 95 high. So excuse me if 1.33 degrees means shit to me.
You still dont get it You are pointing out DAILY WEATHER occurances, you are not looking at the large scale climate level, 1.33 degrees is the temperature rise of the ENTIRE PLANET, this will have an effect on the every part of the globe on unpredictable levels I assume you live in Texas (I guess) since you pointed that out before, Texas is undergoing a cooling period, as you pointed out before, as I said before, the increasing global temperature will have different effects on different places
It does'nt matter, you still pointed out that it snowed in texas, It was expected by climate experts that through climate models that texas was going through a cooling trend becasue of unpredictable changes in the climate system
You think these Climate Hacks can predict anything? According to these climate hacks, New York City should have been somewhere inside the Atlantic Ocean due to rising sea levels by now. They said in the 1980s that if we kept up the warming, that by the late 90s, NYC would be in the Atlantic Ocean and no more. What the hell happened on that one?
These people couldn't predict the weather tomorrow, you think I believe they can predict the climate in 10 or 20 years?
Name the Scientist or organization that predicated that please
It has been at least 20 years since that so called "prediction", I already explained that science is constantly changing and testing new theories, everything that I have said regarding the prediction of the climate is based on data that has been collected throughout the century by thousands of scientists so a prediction by one scientist or organization is insignificant compared to the predictions by all scientists
James Hansen, I believe. Look how that prediction turned out. He was wrong and now looks pretty stupid and lacks credibility.
Yes, science is constantly changing, and it's moving away from Global Warming and now it is being called Climate Change.
Thus far, it's gone from Global Warming to Global Cooling to Global Warming to Climate Change in the last decade. Why do they keep changing the name? Answer: It's a fuckin' scam.
My god you are dumb, its climate change as a result of global warming the terms are not changing you are too dumb to keep up with them, as I said 1000 times before the earth will experience global climate CHANGE as a result of overall global warming some areas will become cooler others warming and other will get more precipitation while others get less
What are you arguing? James Hansen conplete refutes everything you say
@plaguelandscapes Climate Change means it can be Global Warming and Global Cooling you shmuck. Change can mean anything. If the temps go down, it's a change. If the temps go up, it's a change. They have been wrong about cooling and now they're wrong about warming, so they use the phrase "Climate Change" to cover their own asses. I don't know how the fuck you ever got through college when you fundamentally lack common sense.
Wrong once again, the overall temperature of the earth has increased and therefore is causing the climate to CHNAGE in different areas, the two concepts are linked together they are not interchangeable like you think ,
YOU are the once you lacks common sense because you are denying things that are inherent facts, YOU also do not have a degree in science so you have no business making scientific claims that you know nothing about
@plaguelandscapes Buddy, I don't need a degree in science to understand that you're full of shit. You supposedly have a degree in science and you haven't told me anything I haven't already heard or know. To say the least, I'm NOT impressed. I think you should go back to that college you got your degree from and demand a refund, that is, if you didn't get one of them mail ordered degrees.
Please don't confuse facts with propaganda.
1.33 degrees over 100 years is gonna kill us? LMFAO.
You are unimpressed by concrete facts? then you are in denial, you are the one who is spreading right wing, denialist propaganda.
and yes the temperature will increase by even more than 1.33 and yes will kill and dislpace millions of people because of the consequences that you seem to want to ignore
Don't care about obese people, but smoking, it effects other people. If your obese its not like contagious but other people have to breathe in someone else's tar smoke...
AlexFoeShizzle 1 month ago
The part about all the food we have in America and the toxins and all that, that is one thing that one has to admit is true. We have a lot of food and are so used to being luxury and spoiled, compared to other countries, and the food we have has so much crap in it. No wonder we get cancer....
tall32guy 1 month ago
the guy w tha tie is even more annoying than that canadian crazy slut...
bistnenutte 2 months ago in playlist More videos from librarien
This breast feeding situation was very grey. The man in the red tie is probably very embarrassed now by how much a fool he is.
amishfriendshipbread 4 months ago
Bif Naked, ugh I had forgotten about her.
strangepowder 6 months ago
how is being fat a personal problem i mean i guess you have to deal with it on a personal level mentally, but if being fat is personal, then being gay is personal!
Stateoftention 6 months ago
Interesting how the arguments on both sides haven't really changed, yet only the pro-SSM arguments are getting better with time.
PerilocutionAZ09 6 months ago
Hey! Chicago! Woot! ABC 7 news. LOL!
ksb78 7 months ago
BIF Naked is hot
littlecyote 9 months ago
@littlecyote she is hot in an unconventional / radical way but she sounds like an airhead lol
PimpMyParadigm 6 months ago
the guy with the tie is SUCH a FUCKING IDIOT
princessa94 1 year ago 26
Comment removed
AbChrispy 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Dude im in love with tattoo chick
She looks insane and i love it
BaneH711 1 year ago
Dude im in love with tattoo chick
She looks insane and i love it
BaneH711 1 year ago 4
Thanks for uploading this, @librarien! I was never a big Bill Maher fan but recently, with all of the Christine O'Donnell hoopla, even as a young Canadian, I find his commentary interesting, and his panel oftentimes (on Real Time nowadays) hilarious and informative.
pushelildaisies 1 year ago
Wow, this guy says being fat is personal, but having gay marriage is an assault on "the family." Ultimate hypocrite.
TheReasonParty 1 year ago 28
This has been flagged as spam show
Ron Paul on gay marriage (Dr. Paul says yes and even wins the Values Summit GOP Straw Poll!)
/watch?v=l1gzs27HswQ on gay marriage statement
/watch?v=ug1nZSI_fsA Values Straw Poll result conservation
Vote Ron Paul, President 2012! -- The anti-war candidate -- and champion of the Constitution!
vechorik 3 months ago
@TheReasonParty You just described republicans. Ultimate hypocrites is all they are.
TroutButter 1 month ago
That Fitton guy is the most stupid guy ive ever seen.
roflmaocopter999 1 year ago 4
Milk is fucking amazing. I would not be able to survive without milk. I probably drink WAYY too much of it, but I could give a shit less.
What goes into my body is MY business, not anyone else's. Drinking too much milk does not harm anyone else in any way. Period.
rrpauldoran 1 year ago 4
Milk is just nasty, and its really weird that humans still drink it into adulthood. The biggest claim is that it;s a good source of calcium....well if you learn about it...the cows milk has so much calcium from the grass that it eats. Skip the milk and just eat green leafy veggies and your fine. People just need to think logically and do some research and stop listing to opinions and follow actual fact.
SNOWradd 1 year ago
Bill Maher has it pretty wrong on milk. Sure, drinking a lot of milk is bad for you, but in moderation, it is perfectly fine and healthy. Plus, who gives a fuck what other people put into their bodies? It's thier choices.
DanDan825 1 year ago 3
ugh the mother should have thought about the reaciton endoff.
But then this video is TOTALLY out fo context.
DarkKnightBob1o1 1 year ago
The ONLY time you should drink milk is if you are trying to ingest large amounts of fat and vitamins like calcium. For instance, if you lift weights a lot you should drink a little milk every now and then. Other than that, don't touch the stuff, it will kill you deader than a hammer.
The only analogy I can think of is it is like diesel fuel, it packs a wallop but if you use it in an engine that isn't primed for it then it will ruin it.
n0s1r 1 year ago
bif naked is sexy
classicwiseguy 1 year ago
@classicwiseguy I went to one of her shows, she biffed on my cock, naked.
n0s1r 1 year ago
@KOMC4444
so you're telling me that all these abnormalities are caused by milk? most of these things could be caused by other factors much more than with milk.
Also, just because no other animal does it doesn't mean it's unnatural. humans are the only creatures to walk upright on two legs and wear clothing covering our bodies. I don't see Bill Mahr saying let's walk on all fours and go around naked because it's 'unnatural' to wear clothes. Man, no one can have fun with food anymore...
TheDirkaNinja 1 year ago
The one with the peircings kinda looks like a goth Lady Gaga.
autumndominiqe 1 year ago
@autumndominiqe
Dude, Bif Naked was around way before "Lady Gaga". The comparison would be the other way around, although I'd be hard pressed to want to make that comparison.
Maverick6429 1 year ago
i never drink milk, idk why XD
D4R3W 1 year ago
I was so on Bill Mahr side on everything until he went all weirdo on milk.
What he says is kinda retarded saying that we shouldn't drink milk...
TheDirkaNinja 1 year ago
Ive actually had gay sex with the red tie guy
JipsyJon 1 year ago
@JipsyJon would you recomend him?
paratrooper6 1 year ago
i can't believe tv from only 10 years ago looks that old and terrible.
frizico 1 year ago 2
@frizico dvd was still in its infancy around this time and HD didn't come out yet lol
nmryda 1 year ago
milk is nasty. that man is an idiot.
ZennLa13 1 year ago
Noticed the same thing, when i was in America. I usually wear M size (Europe), but in America even the S size were to wide for me!
ghostking0 1 year ago
Vanilla Soy Milk is the best :)
jerezsrg 2 years ago
and btw, the economic crisis began WAY before Obama was even in office, it was caused by the retard before him who decided to invade Iraq and spend billions upon billions of dollars (a war that everyone admits was a tactical error and was probagated through a lie), and because of the unrestrained free market economy where greedy assholes fucked everyone else over. Obama's spending was necessary to fix a problem that he inhereted
plaguelandscapes 2 years ago
Son, you don't even understand a subject that you've studied in college, don't try to fuck with me in Economics.
Bush had zip to do with the Economic Crisis. It was Clinton who repealed Glass-Steagall and doubled down on CRA, Carter signed CRA, Barney Frank, Chris Dodd, Franklin Reigns, etc. all Democrats were in charge of the oversight of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.
Too much debt was mounted by CRA and repealing Glass Steagall allowed the Freddie and Fannie to trade the derivatives.
dicendimes 2 years ago
Obama's spending is necessary for shit, he's creating the next economic crisis, which will either be high inflation or high interest rates like we had in the 1970s.
You can't borrow, spend, tax as much as you want w/o consequences. Either the dollar will collapse or the dollar will come back, but it will take high interest rates to repair the damage Obama has done to the value of it.
dicendimes 2 years ago
Variations in solar output have been the cause of past climate changes, but solar forcing is thought to be too small to account for a significant part of global warming in recent decades.
plaguelandscapes 2 years ago
Greenhouse gases and solar forcing affect temperatures in different ways. While both increased solar activity and increased greenhouse gases are expected to warm the troposphere, an increase in solar activity should warm the stratosphere while an increase in greenhouse gases should cool the stratosphere. Observations show that temperatures in the stratosphere have been steady or cooling since 1979. Radiosonde data from the pre-satellite era show cooling since 1958.
plaguelandscapes 2 years ago
global surface temperature is likely to rise a further 1.1 to 6.4 °C (2.0 to 11.5 °F) during the 21st century. Some other uncertainties include how warming and related changes will vary from region to region around the globe. Most studies focus on the period up to the year 2100. However, warming is expected to continue beyond 2100 even if emissions stop, because of the large heat capacity of the oceans and the long lifetime of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere
plaguelandscapes 2 years ago
@plaguelandscapes LMFAO. Warming will continue beyond 2100? Buddy, you're just digging the hole deeper. Hey, why don't you do like James Hansen did and make a prediction of when Manhattan will go under water due to rising sea levels.
He said in 1988 it would go under by 1998 and here we are in 2010 and we still have Manhattan. LMFAO.
dicendimes 2 years ago
YES, the temperature will continue to increase beyond that point even if we adopt strong measures, (which we dont seem to be doing) because of the large heat capacities of the ocean and the long lifetime of CO2 that will remain in the atmosphere.
And you are still refering to ONE prediction by ONE person ONE time, you connot deny the factual consensus of all respectable scientists and all academies throughout the world
plaguelandscapes 2 years ago
In 20 years, people like you will be nothing more than a laughing stock in the pages of history when your Global Warming garbage doesn't pan out.
You're the Flat Earthers of our time.
dicendimes 2 years ago
An increase in global temperature will cause sea levels to rise and will change the amount and pattern of precipitation, probably including expansion of subtropical deserts.[7] Warming will be strongest in the Arctic and will be associated with continuing retreat of glaciers, permafrost and sea ice. Other likely effects include increases in the intensity of extreme weather events, species extinctions, and changes in agricultural yields.
plaguelandscapes 2 years ago
"The IPCC also concludes that variations in natural phenomena such as solar radiation and volcanism produced most of the warming from pre-industrial times to 1950 and had a small cooling effect afterward.[2][3] These basic conclusions have been endorsed by more than 40 scientific societies and academies of science,[B] including all of the national academies of science of the major industrialized countries."
plaguelandscapes 2 years ago
"The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) concludes that most of the observed temperature increase since the middle of the 20th century was caused by increasing concentrations of greenhouse gases resulting from human activity such as fossil fuel burning and deforestation."
THIS IS A FACT THAT NO SCIENTIFIC ORGANIZATION REFUTES
plaguelandscapes 2 years ago
and then give sean hannity a rimjob
plaguelandscapes 2 years ago
"You can go suck Mark Levin's dick and then give sean hannity a rimjob" - plaguelandscapes
Thanks for admitting defeat. Good luck with your Muscle Atrophying Diet and your Not-So-Smart Car. You may not be saving the planet, but as long as you feel that you are, that's what counts at the end of the day, I guess.
You're a good Democrat and Uncle Barry will be counting on you in 2012, of course by then, you might be the only one he truly could count on.
dicendimes 2 years ago
You can go suck Mark Levin's dick
plaguelandscapes 2 years ago
1965 - Solid Waste Disposal Act PL 89-272
1969 - National Environmental Policy Act PL 91-190
1970 - Resource Recovery Act PL 91-512
1976 - Resource Conservation and Recovery Act PL 94-580
1980 - Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act ("Superfund") PL 96-510
1982 - Nuclear Waste Repository Act PL 97-425
1984 - Hazardous and Solid Wastes Amendments Act PL 98-616
1986 - Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act PL 99-499
plaguelandscapes 2 years ago
1947 - Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act
1964 - Wilderness Act PL 88-577
1968 - Scenic Rivers Preservation Act PL 90-542
1969 - National Environmental Policy Act PL 91-190
1970 - Wilderness Act PL 91-504
1977 - Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act PL 95-87
1978 - Wilderness Act PL 98-625
1980 - Alaska Land Protection Act PL 96-487
1994 - California Desert Protection Act PL 103-433
1996 - Food Quality Protection Act
plaguelandscapes 2 years ago
plaguelandscapes 2 years ago
can also list about a thousand more acts that the EPA has implemented to improve you life
plaguelandscapes 2 years ago
decade = century
dicendimes 2 years ago
Your argument is WRONG and you wont admit it, you just contnue to blame everything on liberal and socialist conspiracies and scientific facts that you call "garbage" when in fact they have been tested and verified, so your argument has absolutely no standing
I would love to hear your alternative theories (if you had any at all)
plaguelandscapes 2 years ago
It's not a conspiracy, it's a damn fact. You don't think there is a movement in our Government to Socialize this country and do things behind our backs? Where the hell have you been? They are trying to pass a Health Care bill behind closed doors after Obama promised to air the discussions 8 times on CSPAN. So please, don't lecture me about conspiracies when there are facts on the table.
I don't have theories, I base my argument and opinion on reality. I told you the Sun is the major cause.
dicendimes 2 years ago
The Sun is NOT the major cause look at any scientific evidence throughout every science academy throughout the world, look at the graphs, PLEASE just look at the data, i dont know why you wont take it seriously, everything is not a socialist conspiracy, besides, implementing some socialist policies will not be the end of the world look at every other industrialized nation in the world, they have all adopted socialist policies, we are NOT falling into soviet russia like you think
plaguelandscapes 2 years ago
We have enough Socialist Policies in this country and we have a 12 Trillion Dollar National Debt as a result of these God Damn Socialist Policies. We have a Federal Reserve, Welfare, a bankrupted Social Security, and Massive Spending as a result of the Socialism we already have.
No thanks, we don't need anymore Socialism.
The Govt is taking over the Car Companies, Banks, Health Care, Oil, capping Salaries, what the hell do you call this shit? I call it Soviet Russia. This ain't America.
dicendimes 2 years ago
Look a every other industrialized nation, they all adopt socialist policies
Austrialia is not experiencing a recession like we are, France has the best heathcare system in the world and is the most environmentally frienldy, Canada also has a better healthcare system than we do
what more evidence do you need?
You are WRONG about everything
plaguelandscapes 2 years ago
@plaguelandscapes LMFAO. Canada, France, and Australia? Tell me something, why do Canadians leave their country to get their health care in America? Why do Canadian Doctors prefer to practice in America? Why does Canada suffer from a little problem like Doctor Shortages?
Don't get me started on France, where they pay 60% of their income in taxes and 48% in taxes in Canada plus, they pay VAT taxes on top of it.
If America is inferior to these countries, why do you live in it? LMFAO.
dicendimes 2 years ago
AUSTRALIA-NOT HAVING A RECESSION
FRANCE-best healthcare SYSTEM, and independant of foreign oil
I live in America becasue I love America and want to re-establish the principles that it was FOUNDED on, and i am embarressed that we have fallen so far from the secular principles that we were founded on. YOU are anit-American becasue you deny reason, logic and empirical understanding, every one of the founding fathers would be rolling over in their gaves if they know that YOU were an American
plaguelandscapes 2 years ago
@plaguelandscapes We have a recession in America b/c we have a Socialist Goon in the White House who is raising taxes and spending more money we don't even have in the midst of a financial crisis.
Who said America was founded on Secular Principles? It was founded on Judeo-Christian Values. Congress traditionally opened a session with a prayer.
Yes, I am Anti-American, I should be more American like you and praise countries like Canada and France over America, that would American of me. LMAO
dicendimes 2 years ago
All you need to see that America is a secularist nation is an open history book
The 1797 Treaty of Tripoli states
"The government of the United States of America is not in any sense founded on the Christian Religion."
Written by the 55 members of the Philadephila convention, which include George Washington, Benjamin Franklin, and Thomas Jefferson
Thomas Jefferson was a confirmed Athiest and was a propopnent of the separation of church and state, which is what our first amendment is
plaguelandscapes 2 years ago
It's founded on the principles of the Christian and Jewish religions, not on the religions themselves per se.
Jefferson was a Unitarian, not an Atheist. He was a proponent of Religious Freedom, not Separation of Church and State.
Separation of Church and State is NOT our First Amendment. The First Amendment says Congress shall pass no law recognizing the Establishment of Religion. This means, for example, the Catholic Church cannot run our Congress, not removing God from everything.
dicendimes 2 years ago
And its not just CO2, fluorinated gases and methane are purley the result of human activities, NOT NATURAL PROCESSES
plaguelandscapes 2 years ago
A Volcanic Eruption is more detrimental to the environment than just about any human activity. The only human activity that I could think of that might destroy the environment is nuclear warfare.
dicendimes 2 years ago
I agree with you here but it is beside the point because volcanism casuses global cooling and has prevented the earth from warming more than it has this century and the environemnt WILL be destroyed through desertification and drought in some areas, as well as the shifting of agricultural belts, it will affect PEOPLE
plaguelandscapes 2 years ago
Rising average temperatures are already affecting the environment. Some observed changes include shrinking of glaciers, thawing of permafrost, later freezing and earlier break-up of ice on rivers and lakes, lengthening of growing seasons, shifts in plant and animal ranges and earlier flowering of trees
plaguelandscapes 2 years ago
Buddy, this shit was going on before man ever drove their first car. At one time, the entire world was practically a glacier. We've had continental divides, we've had shifts in tectonic plates, we've seen seasons grow and shrink, earlier flowering of trees and later flowering of trees. There is no ideal climate or weather.
So keep avoiding meat and keep driving your smart car and let's see where that gets you. You can't control the Climate.
dicendimes 2 years ago
The bottom line is when you disrupt the balance of nature it has detrimental effects we add 37.9 billion tons of CO2 into the atmosphere that is not meant to be there, obviously it is going to acellerate the greenhouse effect, you say that that we have cut down CO2 emmissions when we acutally havent, I aknowledge that the earth goes through cycles but not at the accelleration that is happening today because of humans
plaguelandscapes 2 years ago
Who are you to determine what is meant to be there or not? We live on the Earth and we use it. We don't pollute nearly as much as we used to in the past. China is the problem, with their air being dirtier than an asshole.
Honestly, if we're going to put a stop to this, we would have to legalize murder, have as many wars as possible, encourage more abortions, drug more people to death, legalize assisted suicide, and destroy as many factories and factory jobs as possible.
dicendimes 2 years ago
I agree that as China and India become more industrialized they will contribute far more CO2 emmisssion to the atmosphere becasue the only fuel source that they have is coal( the dirtiest energy source) and the fact that they have far more people than we do;
what you said about legalizing murder, assited suicide ect..is rediculous all we need is more investment in alternative energy sources and fuel efficiency, thats all im asking for
plaguelandscapes 2 years ago
I'm for alternative energy sources as well, but when the markets dictate it, we will have it. Govt can't force us in that direction, the people must demand it themselves with their money.
dicendimes 2 years ago
Government has to dictate funding for alternative energy sources because the Amercian population is too uneducated to realize the threat that global climate change presents to the world Just look at our literacy rates and our amount of science degree graduates; it is far behind the rest of the world, and people continue to buy SUV's and make other poor choices
I just want to pound it home that temperature has NOT been decreasing in the last decade, who is telling you this?
plaguelandscapes 2 years ago
Yes, we are too uneducated and ignorant to buy into Global Warming, that's it. LMFAO.
Who has to tell me that the temperatures have been decreasing in the last decade? Alls one has to do is open their fuckin' eyes and pay attention and could see it for themselves. Everyone knows it's been decreasing this last decade, that's why the majority of people now think Global Warming is bullshit.
We've had snow in Michigan in fuckin' May in this last decade, never happened once in the 1990s or 80s.
dicendimes 2 years ago
You dont understand science or else you would agree with me
Its not a matter of buying into global warming it is 100% fact and if you disagree you might as well disagree that the earth is round and that evolution is fact and you STILL are not understanding the concept that Global warming casues Climate CHANGE and that it will affect the climate of areas differetly, of course I would expect that the climate would be weird when it shouldnt be, you proved my point
plaguelandscapes 2 years ago
@plaguelandscapes The climate is weird and has changed since the dawn of time. You're the one who might as well believe the Earth is flat if you believe in Man-Made Global Warming, you dunce cap. You have no understanding that the sun is the number 1 factor of our climate, you God damn fool, that's why the climate is different near the equator than it is near the arctic, and different by a lot too i might add.
dicendimes 2 years ago
The climate HAS changed before i've aknowledged this 1000 times, that is not the problem, the problem is that it is changing too fast and we dont have the time to adapt to it, and ONCE AGAIN the sun is NOT the major factor when solar output has decreased in recent years, YOU ADMITTED THIS, so the cause for Global warming IS man made because carbon emmissions are geenhouse gasses and when they increase by almost 40% because of industrialization the temperature is obviously going to increase
plaguelandscapes 2 years ago
@plaguelandscapes Solar output has decreased in the last 10 years and the temps have decreased with it, yes, I admitted that.
You're wrong, it's about 4% not 40% of Carbon Emissions created by industrialization.
dicendimes 2 years ago
The temperatures have not decreased, look at any graph showing the steady increase in temperatures this decade just look at the evidence.
And I said that carbon emmison have INCREASED by 40% SINCE industrilization. 4% is gross factual error
plaguelandscapes 2 years ago
I looked at the evidence, boy. It has trended downwards in the last 8 - 10 years. From Dec. 2000 to Nov. 2009, it has decreased by 1.3 degrees Fahrenheit.
You didn't say increased, you said humans account for 40% of carbon emissions on the planet and I corrected you and said, it's less than 4% of our total carbon emissions.
dicendimes 2 years ago
You are just to ideological and think that everything is a conspiracy and wont admit when you are wrong,
I want to know where you are getting your information becasue it CANNOT be a reputable source if it says that humans are not responsible for Global Warming
plaguelandscapes 2 years ago
You're ideological if you think there is some ideal climate for every location on the planet where it has to rain a certain amount and temperatures have to be consistent each year.
The information I get is all over the internet and it's common sense written in science books and talking to people who know more about this topic than you or I do.
dicendimes 2 years ago
I said that climate is unpredictable, I have said before that daily weather patterns are averaged to show the enitre climate change on the macro level
The information you get cannot possibly be written in science books you believe in pseudo-science
plaguelandscapes 2 years ago
Pseudo-science? If you look at old science books, you get the true data, not a revisionist history as you get in current editions.
dicendimes 2 years ago
Science is constantly changing and revising, newer books have more uptdated theories and information, I know your going to blame it on liberal and socialist biased that you think exist in every part of our society, but this is simply not the case and it is your neo-conservative philosophjy that is enslaving your mind and warping your interpretation of basic scientific facts
plaguelandscapes 2 years ago
Neo-Conservative? A Neo-Con is a Jew, I'm not a Jew and I didn't become a Conservative b/c I support Israel like a group of Jews did.
I understand the books have to be updated, but while they are being updated, they are rewriting history at the same time. The science is updating, but the facts are also being distorted. Unlike you, I don't just swallow it whole, I pick it apart and filter out the garbage.
dicendimes 2 years ago
I was using Neo-con as an abriviation to use less charaters, Im not swallowing anything whole I dont just read text books I do my own research, I study science it is my life, you already admitted to me that you dont have a degree in science
so why are you even arguing with me? I obviously know more about the climate cycles of the earth than you do, you are arguing a positon that does not even exist and has been refuted by countless facts that I have presented over and over again
plaguelandscapes 2 years ago
I don't have a degree in science, but that doesn't mean I don't know shit about science, I know enough to make a common sense argument and opinion and have backed it up with facts.
I'm aware of the facts you presented before we even engaged in this discussion, and I have told you, that a 1.33 degree increase over 100 years is hysteria.
dicendimes 2 years ago
You obviously dont know anything about geoscience because if you did you would realize the threat that that increase in temperature has over that short amount of time, then you would realize how serious a problem that climate change has become
If we continue the way that we are, the temperature will increase by at least (2-11 degrees F)
plaguelandscapes 2 years ago
It's obvious that the more you've studied science, the less you now understand it than before you even studied it.
2 - 11 Degrees F after it took us 100 years to gain a whopping 1.33 degrees? LMFAO.
dicendimes 2 years ago
2010*
plaguelandscapes 2 years ago
The problem is the rate at which this is happening, and it is not natural phenomena, every single academy of science in the world contends that the earth is warming and humans contributing CO2 to the atmosphere is the cause
This is not a "controversial issue" its scientific fact
plaguelandscapes 2 years ago
You're not making a good case here, you're saying that b/c every single academy of science in the world contends that the earth is warming automatically makes it a fact.
Consensus is not a FACT.
At one time, if anyone disagreed that the Earth was Flat, they were deemed crazy, b/c the CONSENSUS at one time was that the Earth was FLAT.
dicendimes 2 years ago
I know consensus is not a fact I made that point before regarding when most PEOPLE dont agree, but when every scientist has studied this and found irrefutable evidence, EVIDENCE, NOT OPINION, and even average people can observe the effects of climate change ( I have noticed that certain birds in the area where I live have changed their migration patterns, and certain species of flowers bloom at strange times) then consensus among scientists is correct
plaguelandscapes 2 years ago
Nobody is disputing the fact that the climate is changing, the dispute is whether humans are causing it or not. There are scientists who don't believe that man is causing the climate to change. At one time, we had pangea and then the continental divides, that caused climates to change.
Al Gore and the scientists who push Global Warming won't even debate Lord Monckton. Monckton isn't even a scientist, and these guys are too scared to debate him. If the truth was on their side, they would.
dicendimes 2 years ago
Exactly, he's not a scientist, they dont debate him becasue it would be meaningless, humans ARE causing this, the sun is NOT causing global warming becasue there is data that shows that solar output to earth has been decreasing since the 1980s, there are countless graphs by NASA that show this, humans put 37.9 Billion tons of CO2 in the atmosphere every year, of course this accellerates the greenhouse effect and of course it will affect the climate
plaguelandscapes 2 years ago
He's not a scientist, but he is very knowledgeable in the topic. If he was not a threat, why did they drown him out with protests and ranting in Copenhagen, rather than let him give his speech?
NASA gets their graphs from those fraud scientists involved in Climate Gate and their as Left Wing an organization as they come. They manipulate the data to push an agenda.
They want us all paying Carbon Taxes to the New World Order. Stop trusting this Government and start thinking for yourself.
dicendimes 2 years ago
He's not a climate scientist so he is not knowledgable on the topic he was the Glenn Beck show, everything he says about the climate is irrelavent becasue he wrong like you are, there is no debate about this because it is factAnd i think if any scientific organization is qualified to give data regarding the Earth it would be NASA. If anyone doesnt trust the governemtn its me, I dont care about what the governement says about Global Warming becasue they are backed by lobbyists in the oil industry
plaguelandscapes 2 years ago
Actually you do trust the Government, and you are pushing their garbage and you don't even know it. You don't care what they say about Global Warming, b/c you trust the Govt.
dicendimes 2 years ago
The governemnt not adopting any kind of initiatives to curb CO2 emmissions
So why would I be supporting them right now?
There is no money in conservation which is why they are not adopting any drastic changes
plaguelandscapes 2 years ago
Have you ever heard of a Carbon Tax?
dicendimes 2 years ago
It seems like you doubt the greenhouse effect even exists
plaguelandscapes 2 years ago
I do doubt the greenhouse effect even exists or it's so damn negligible, it's a shame we are even discussing it and blowing it up into such a controversial issue.
With the atmosphere and surface area of the Earth as large as it is and the CO2 levels at .038% and Water Vapors making up less than 1% of the Earth's Atmosphere, you honestly believe there is some Greenhouse Effect? Be serious.
This is a hoax to pass a worldwide Carbon Tax and create a One World Government at Copenhagen.
dicendimes 2 years ago
If the greenhouse effect did not exist our planet would not be habitable, the greenhouse effect was discovered in 1824, it 2009, its rediculous im even arguing that it exists
Carbon Dioxide contributes 9-26% of the greenhouse effect
The greenhouse effect in moderation keeps our planet relatively warm, but a an acelleration in the greenhouse effect, which is what is happening now is causing more radiative forcing than whats sustainable
plaguelandscapes 2 years ago
I didn't say the Greenhouse Effect doesn't exist, I said it's negligible. Water Vapors contribute 95% of the Greenhouse Effect. The U.S. Energy Department doesn't even recognize Water Vapor as a Greenhouse Effect. Human Beings contribute about 3.5% to all the Carbon Dioxide on the Earth. Very small and negligible.
dicendimes 2 years ago
You said that you "doubt it even exists", and it is not negligable, its the driving force that keeps our planet warm and habitable, and the introduction of any surplus of greenhouse gasses will accellerate the process and lead to warming because of the absorption of more UV rays
plaguelandscapes 2 years ago
The sun is the driving force of keeping the planet warm and habitable. Greenhouse gases would be worthless if we had no sun or the sun became too powerful.
dicendimes 2 years ago
You are right that the sun is the most important determinant, but not when solar output has decreased in recent years
plaguelandscapes 2 years ago
Yes, solar output has decreased in recent years and so have the temperatures. We are in the midst of an Arctic Blast in the United States. It snowed in Houston, TX this year for Christ's sake.
dicendimes 2 years ago
Again, the temperatures have not decreased, they have increased by 1.33 degrees F, the information that you are getting is from a wrong, biased source, and once again, its climate CHANGE brought about by overall global warming; some places will become colder, some warmer, some will get more precipitation and others less. Its not one uniform occurance, the climate system is complex and unpredictable
plaguelandscapes 2 years ago
You're talking about temperatures increasing over 100 years, I'm talking about temperatures decreasing over the last decade. I already told you that we peaked between 1998 - 2001 in warming temperatures. You cannot honestly tell me that 2009 was a warmer year than 1998 otherwise, you're flat out lying.
Climate Change is such crap, it's called the weather. Some years are warmer than others and rain more than others. Is there really such a thing as an Ideal Climate? LMFAO.
dicendimes 2 years ago
The Rise in temperature is irreverable even if the temperature has decreased in the last decade (which it hasnt) the heat is still ratained in the ocean becasue water has a high specific heat and through thermohaline circulation and ocean currents, is tranported throughout the world and the heat is distributed
plaguelandscapes 2 years ago
irreversable*
plaguelandscapes 2 years ago
Oh ok, so the heat is all retained in the ocean. LMFAO. So the whales and sharks are feeling the effects, not us. I get it now.
dicendimes 2 years ago
So your saying that the oceans have no effect on our climate, you ARE retarted,
you obviously have no clue about the cycles that drive the climate of the Earth, do even know what thermohaline circulation means?
plaguelandscapes 2 years ago
I said the oceans have no effect on our climate? LMFAO. Putting words in your opponent's mouth means you lost this argument.
You're claiming now that all the Global Warming is in the Ocean so we can't see it, when you've been ranting and raving about how its effecting temperatures and life on the land.
dicendimes 2 years ago
Thats what you implied. You were trivializing the effect that the oceans have on our climate, and that is not what I said, what I said is that the oceans retain heat becasue water has a high specific heat and of course the temperature of the oceans has an effect on the temperature of the and which once again proves that you know NOTHING about the climate and have no understanding of geoscience
plaguelandscapes 2 years ago
I wasn't trivializing anything, you were going off topic like you usually do and I was mocking you for it.
The topic is CO2, where the fuck does the Ocean come into this? Either you're going to build your case that man is creating enough CO2 to change the climate or walk away.
dicendimes 2 years ago
No, based on what you said you were making a joke of it just to somehow make what I said irrelavent, and I wasnt going off topic becasue the ocean obviously has an effect on the climate becasue the heat absorbed by the CO2 as a result of the greenhouse effect will then be store as heat enregy in the ocean, making the warming irreversable,
You dont understand the complex climate systems, everything has an effect on everything else
plaguelandscapes 2 years ago
If the warming is irreversable as you claim, why have we been cooling for the last 10 years?
I have a relatively good understanding of the climate, you're just trying to make it more complicated than it really is and you're confusing yourself.
Intelligence isn't marked by making something simple more complicated, it's about making the more complicated simple.
dicendimes 2 years ago
You STILL do not understand
We have definately not been cooling in the last t 10 years you have been obtaining wrong information look at any graph by the EPA, NOAA or the IPCC that shows the climb in temperature that has existsted since the begining of the century
The climate IS a complex system that involves many cycles working together; Im not making it more complicated, it already is a complicated system but the things that are affecting it are not that difficult to understand
plaguelandscapes 2 years ago
Anybody with common sense and is actually paying attention can see for themselves that the temps have been cooling this last decade. The EPA is worthless and nothing more than the arm of the Govt and Govt just wants control.
dicendimes 2 years ago
The temps have not been cooling you stil dont understand, The EPA has implemented more plans to protect the environment and the American people than any organization in the history of mankind so do not lecture me in the insignificance of this organization , we would have a much more dirtier and unhealthy society if it wasnt for them; you as an American citizen own more to them than you know or could possibly realize just simply look up the initiatives implemented by the EPA in American histor
plaguelandscapes 2 years ago
How bout the EPA can kiss my ass. I don't owe them shit, alls they do is regulate what I can do on my own God damn property and drive up my taxes.
The EPA now has the power to pass Crap N Tax if Congress doesn't.
Fuck those Hippie Fascists. I hope the next Republican President is a Conservative and completely eliminates the EPA, b/c that is one bureaucracy we sure as hell don't need. I know Ron Paul would kick their asses to the curb.
dicendimes 2 years ago
plaguelandscapes 2 years ago
@plaguelandscapes Yes, and all these regulations, what have they given us? We still emit more CO2 than ever, according to your studies. Good job EPA! LMFAO.
dicendimes 2 years ago
What regulation of CO2? what are you talking about? We still emit 37.9 billion tons of CO2 in the atmosphere each year not to mention that fact that we are cutting down the rainforest and less trees exist to abosrb the CO2 in the atmosphere, none of the regualtions exist because the lobbyists that work for the oil companies do not want them to exist because it would mean less money THERE IS NO MONEY IN CONSERVATION, thats why we dont implement plans to curb CO2 emmisions
plaguelandscapes 2 years ago
@plaguelandscapes Ok, so if we ban oil companies from drilling in more places, what do you think this will do to the supply and price? You want to pay $10 / gallon of gas? Keep putting regulations on where oil companies can drill, question is if you can afford it.
You want to tax oil companies more? Go ahead, they'll just pass it on to the consumer. Either way, the oil companies win, they'll still make money at $4 / gallon or $10 / gallon, it's the ppl who are effected.
dicendimes 2 years ago
Im not saying that we ban oil companies you are putting words in my mouth, I said That I think it is reprehensible that they have so much influence on our government
I want more investment in alternative energy sources and to improve fuel efficiency for the time being, and for people to stop being retarted and stop driving SUV's( and I dont drive a smart car you idiot, they dont even get that good of gas mileage) Nothing is a better form of transportation than my legs.
plaguelandscapes 2 years ago
There are a lot of things being put in your mouth, words are not what I have in mind.
What influence do the oil companies have on Obama and Nancy Pelosi?
If you want alternative energy, you have to create a market for them. You want people to stop driving SUVs, create a market for something better than an SUV.
You should love high gas prices, that's a great way to reduce the number of people driving SUVs.
What good are your legs as a form of transportation when there's snow and ice?
dicendimes 2 years ago
I'm just wasting my time, I feel like i'm arguing with a 6 year old
any halfway intelligent person will see that you are completely retarted
plaguelandscapes 2 years ago
I feel like I'm arguing with a brain dead idiot who has less of a mentality than a 6 year old, b/c even a 6 year old can put this shit together.
People who over analyze things actually stupify themselves, you're a classic example.
dicendimes 2 years ago
hahahaha that too stupid to even merit a response
plaguelandscapes 2 years ago
Too stupid to even merit a response? No, it's more like, checkmate, you win dicendimes, but I can't admit that b/c I'd have to admit I was wrong.
Face it, you apply the sun to Mars, but not CO2, but you apply CO2 to Earth and not the sun. You don't give 2 shits about evidence, you're a hack.
dicendimes 2 years ago
the thickness of Mars's atmosphere is 1% of that of earth, it CANT retain heat
So I now have proven that you know nothing about science
plaguelandscapes 2 years ago
You didn't prove shit, I knew all this, my case was, it has more to do with the power of the sun and the Greenhouse Effect is purely crap. Mars has a small atmosphere and doesn't retain heat well, but Earth, which has a big atmosphere doesn't retain heat well either. It's the sun that is what is causing the changes, stupid.
dicendimes 2 years ago
The lowest temperture ever recorded on Earth was -90 degrees C and on Mars it was -123 degrees C and can get as low as -146 degrees C, what more do you need?
plaguelandscapes 2 years ago
Thus far, I've gotten you to admit that CO2 is not the only factor that affects the Climate, which is a start. Most Leftists wouldn't even take it this level. As you admitted, atmosphere plays a role as well, and now we also have to admit, the sun plays the most fundamental role in determining the temperature of each planet. When you get down to it, CO2 is small potatoes, it's negligible, it makes up less than .04% of our atmosphere. That is the point I was driving.
dicendimes 2 years ago
Of course its not the only factor, I already know this, many things influence the temperature of the Earth: the amount of
Solar energy, albedo of the earth, heat retained by the atmosphere (the greenhouse effect), and heat distrubution
CO2 levels ARE the main determinant becasue Solar radiation to earth has deacreased as the earth has been warming and CO2 levels have increased
plaguelandscapes 2 years ago
The sun is the most determinant of our temperatures, not CO2 levels. You're trying to draw a direct correlation and you're failing miserably, CO2 levels have been going down even with the planet increasing in temperature.
Correlation also doesn't mean Causation.
dicendimes 2 years ago
what more of correlation do you need?
Temperature increaing, CO2 increasing,
humans burning fossil fuels, plus deforestation and solar output down, there is no natural phenomena that could be contributing to this
plaguelandscapes 2 years ago
Have you looked at the Climate Gate Charts? Those Scientists (who publicly pushed Global Warming just like you) had the real data in their emails and it showed the temperatures moving up and down significantly while the CO2 was continuously rising.
dicendimes 2 years ago
I have read up on that, it doesnt change anything, that was one group of scientists, the dependacne on information from any one set of research results is very very small compared to the overwhelming body of knowledge regarding the climate, not one scientific organization has changed their position becasue there is OVERWHELMING evidence, and besides disagreements among scientists is what moves science forward, the email distort the actual data and minimize the importance of this issue
plaguelandscapes 2 years ago
Well, it should make you think about trusting Government Sources like you seem to do when they disregard important facts.
The Scientists had the real data and they were distorting it and presenting it to the public. They were adding 1500 degrees to the data. It's distortion and deception.
dicendimes 2 years ago
Im not trusting government sources, I have an understanding of how earths climate system works becasue I have devoted my life to it, I read reputable scientific journals from the worlds most respected scintists and academies throughout the world, the information that I obtain is not false becasue it has been tested and verified again and again
And it is still ONE group of scientists, which is insignificant compared to the actual EVIDENCE that had been obtained and still remains unrefuted
plaguelandscapes 2 years ago
If you look at the most respected scientists and economists in the world, they are all pushing Global Warming and Socialism. George Soros is regarded as a highly respected economist, but alls he is really is a damn money changer.
Academia and most organizations are run by the Socialist Elite and they censor anyone who doesn't agree with them either by turning them into persona nongrata or trashing them.
Your evidence is very refutable and there has been evidence to disprove it.
dicendimes 2 years ago
No, everything that I said is 100% fact, its the way the climate works, I refuted everything that you said, your main argument was that the sun was contributing to global warming, which it isnt, so you are wrong, humans are the ones responsible for the climate changing.
you also believed that people breathing crontributed to global warming, this is not true what so ever so that tells me you have no understanding of anything related to global warming
plaguelandscapes 2 years ago
LMFAO. You haven't refuted a God damn thing and you agreed with me that the Sun is the biggest contributor for our temperatures on this planet, who the hell are you fooling?
If you're going to say that Carbon Dioxide is the biggest contributor to Global Warming, then people breathing does contribute to Global Warming, b/c we exhale Carbon Dioxide. You can try to spin it all you want, but Carbon Dioxide is Carbon Dioxide, whether we exhale it or emit it from machines. Case closed.
dicendimes 2 years ago
I HAVE refuted everything you said you just wont admit it or are too stupid to understand, and you must be if you honestly believe that people breathing contributes to Global warming
IT DOESNT WORK THAT WAY, I have already explained this, if you took any time to do any serious research on this you would see that i'm right
plaguelandscapes 2 years ago
LMFAO. Hey Einstein, I don't believe people breathing contributes to Global Warming, I am saying, you believe that if you believe that CO2 is having as big an effect as you claim it does. CO2 is CO2, doesn't matter how it is emitted.
dicendimes 2 years ago
Yes it does matter how it is emmitted because when people breath out CO2 it is absobed back into the enviroment through feedback loops becasue it is such a negligable amount as opposed to when you emmit it into the atmosphere in large quantities like we have been doing in the past century
Dont you think its odd that in the one
century that we have been using fossil fuels that we have seen the largest temperature spike in the shortest amount of time in the last 20 million years
plaguelandscapes 2 years ago
The environment absorbs it all whether in large or small quantities. The Earth is capable of healing itself. The quantity we emit is shit compared to a Volcanic Eruption and the Earth is perfectly capable of absorbing the Eruptions.
Largest Temperature Spike in the last 20 Million Years? 1 Degree over 100 years is the largest spike? Give me a fuckin' break. Could a 1 degree increase in Global Temperatures end an Ice Age? We've had 6 - 7 of those.
dicendimes 2 years ago
Its actually 1.33 degrees and volcanism has nothing to do with what is happening right now except for the fact that it has prevented further warming in this century im not sure why you keep bringing that up, it doesnt make any point at all. You still underestimate the effect that 1.33 degrees has on the environment, which again proves that you know nothing about the climate of the Earth
plaguelandscapes 2 years ago
You know why I underestimate 1.33 degrees? B/c if the temperature was 64 degrees today and 62.77 degrees tomorrow, I still wouldn't feel the damn difference.
In my state, the temperature varies by 90 - 100 degrees each year. It ranges from -10 - 0 low and 90 - 95 high. So excuse me if 1.33 degrees means shit to me.
dicendimes 2 years ago
You still dont get it You are pointing out DAILY WEATHER occurances, you are not looking at the large scale climate level, 1.33 degrees is the temperature rise of the ENTIRE PLANET, this will have an effect on the every part of the globe on unpredictable levels I assume you live in Texas (I guess) since you pointed that out before, Texas is undergoing a cooling period, as you pointed out before, as I said before, the increasing global temperature will have different effects on different places
plaguelandscapes 2 years ago
Texas? No man, Michigan. This is NOT a daily weather occurance, this has the been the trend for the last 10 years.
dicendimes 2 years ago
It does'nt matter, you still pointed out that it snowed in texas, It was expected by climate experts that through climate models that texas was going through a cooling trend becasue of unpredictable changes in the climate system
plaguelandscapes 2 years ago
You think these Climate Hacks can predict anything? According to these climate hacks, New York City should have been somewhere inside the Atlantic Ocean due to rising sea levels by now. They said in the 1980s that if we kept up the warming, that by the late 90s, NYC would be in the Atlantic Ocean and no more. What the hell happened on that one?
These people couldn't predict the weather tomorrow, you think I believe they can predict the climate in 10 or 20 years?
dicendimes 2 years ago
Name the Scientist or organization that predicated that please
It has been at least 20 years since that so called "prediction", I already explained that science is constantly changing and testing new theories, everything that I have said regarding the prediction of the climate is based on data that has been collected throughout the century by thousands of scientists so a prediction by one scientist or organization is insignificant compared to the predictions by all scientists
plaguelandscapes 2 years ago
James Hansen, I believe. Look how that prediction turned out. He was wrong and now looks pretty stupid and lacks credibility.
Yes, science is constantly changing, and it's moving away from Global Warming and now it is being called Climate Change.
Thus far, it's gone from Global Warming to Global Cooling to Global Warming to Climate Change in the last decade. Why do they keep changing the name? Answer: It's a fuckin' scam.
dicendimes 2 years ago
My god you are dumb, its climate change as a result of global warming the terms are not changing you are too dumb to keep up with them, as I said 1000 times before the earth will experience global climate CHANGE as a result of overall global warming some areas will become cooler others warming and other will get more precipitation while others get less
What are you arguing? James Hansen conplete refutes everything you say
plaguelandscapes 2 years ago
@plaguelandscapes Climate Change means it can be Global Warming and Global Cooling you shmuck. Change can mean anything. If the temps go down, it's a change. If the temps go up, it's a change. They have been wrong about cooling and now they're wrong about warming, so they use the phrase "Climate Change" to cover their own asses. I don't know how the fuck you ever got through college when you fundamentally lack common sense.
dicendimes 2 years ago
Wrong once again, the overall temperature of the earth has increased and therefore is causing the climate to CHNAGE in different areas, the two concepts are linked together they are not interchangeable like you think ,
YOU are the once you lacks common sense because you are denying things that are inherent facts, YOU also do not have a degree in science so you have no business making scientific claims that you know nothing about
plaguelandscapes 2 years ago
@plaguelandscapes Buddy, I don't need a degree in science to understand that you're full of shit. You supposedly have a degree in science and you haven't told me anything I haven't already heard or know. To say the least, I'm NOT impressed. I think you should go back to that college you got your degree from and demand a refund, that is, if you didn't get one of them mail ordered degrees.
Please don't confuse facts with propaganda.
1.33 degrees over 100 years is gonna kill us? LMFAO.
dicendimes 2 years ago
You are unimpressed by concrete facts? then you are in denial, you are the one who is spreading right wing, denialist propaganda.
and yes the temperature will increase by even more than 1.33 and yes will kill and dislpace millions of people because of the consequences that you seem to want to ignore
plaguelandscapes 2 years ago