Wikipedia itself, and Wikipedia vandalism are an endlessly fascinating topic to me. I mean, we all know it's going to end up becoming the common man's encyclopedia in the future. It's already become an entrenched part of modern American culture. The first generation to really be entirely raised in the online community their whole lives have anointed it "the thing we go to to look up anything we aren't familiar with". That's fascinating to me. Anyone else? The old media hates them.
Although I agree with Rene on the moon landings, I must admit some of his theories were flawed. I hope I have not offended you or any of Rene's family and friends.
Wikipedia's totally corrupt crew, composed of internet warriors, spreads all sorts of propaganda through their 'neutral' articles. Any edit I've made so far was labelled as 'vandalism' without any explanation.
I'm afraid the court of public opinion is against you hoaxers, so it's really you who are the propagandist and shills selling this crap. Apollo was bought and paid for 40 years ago, there's nothing to sell or buy if you believe in the landings. Nice try, to bad ...really funny, the irony is beyond belief !
If it was only my Question NASA refuse to answer you would have a point. You seem quite angry that I doubt that Apollo put a man on the moon, it wonders me why that is with many NASA supporters this attacking mode against everyone that thinks different. It almost seems like a religion to those Apollo worshippers.
As always I will state "I doubt Apollo put a man on the moon". But to state that NASA fears the question I have proof to you. See my Question to NASA about the statement of Colonel Philip Corso. If they do not fear my question NASA would had answered my question. That is why the whisper gets murmur.
Troll profile conclusion: So, simply stated Jarrah, when you engage these trolls, their will be no change in their deluded, and ignorant states of mind. The only thing they get when you entertain them with attention, is a tiny, wittle, boner. The other reason they are on the net all the time, instead of trying to go out and date. They are afraid of the same ridicule they received in gym class, as they struggled to grow hair, and lose pimples. The same pimple their penis was mistaken for.
Troll Profile continued: Most trolls suffering from feelings of inadequacy, are usually correct about those feelings. From tiny penises, to low IQ's, trolls of this nature are usually very confused about their sexuality. Whatever sexual needs they have, have to be taken into their own hands, or else they must pay professionals to do it for them. Usually they live in a constant state of betrayal. From their mothers, to their employers, they have no moral compass, in any of their relationships.
Psychological Profile for your favorite troll Jarrah:
YT users who use mutliple sockpuppet accounts to support their own twisted beliefs, are at a minimum, suffering from a desire to be felt as important. Since everyone in their physical life either ignores, or makes fun of them, it's important they create alternative persona's online, to feel as if they matter. A constant nagging feeling that they would be better off dead, is usually not only true, but usually wished for by thier family.
Hey Jarrah. I think I figured out your troll problem. The one here using receiver, is one and the same with the many others. But that's not the problem. The problem is this psycho troll/cop, is constantly razzed at work for believing in Apollo, and of course, for being into men, instead of women. So, Rob/Receiver/luke/?/?/?/?/?/? has a huge crush on you, and like schoolyard children, keeps picking on you, due to it. I had a friend do a profile on him, based on his channel and comments.
For those paying attention....You'll see a desperate, attention whore on this video comment section, attempting to engage an actual human being (myself), by using what he mistakenly believes is my first name. The only funnier then him trying to engage me, is watching him continue to use a name, he falsely believes is mine.
Everyone would be better off if they just ignored him. He would go apeshit eventually and go live under a different bridge.
"This video has been watched by 500+ viewers. So yes, I think the Moonlandings were therefore faked."
If that number includes how many times you and your silly sockpuppets have watched this video, then it doesn't count.
But at least you got one thing right, Rob .. The moonlandings were definately faked .. Jarrah alone has proven that fact many times over... Which of course explains why you spew your apollogist troll nonsense on his chanel 24/7.
@receiver69 robot , it makes sence that you dont need any argument ,your not here to sway the doubts of others to your side,but you look down on those who doubt, your here to point out those with whom you rabidly disagree, and to spread your feces about as you do. open discourse on the subject takes a level of compasion,which frankly robots lack :( doubt and dissent are not detrimental to the truth ,if you were any thing but a silly troll youd know taht :D oh and i find robot fits you to a T :D
Auri, You'll find more time, and pleasure ignoring trolls who intentionally provoke negative energy creation. Laugh at them. Then ignore them. They hate that!
Fresh out of billy goat meat, and they'll find new hunting grounds!
BH, Receiver, Rob, Svector...combosockpuppet trolls deserve no attention.
@thegreatpoupon No problem...ROB/SVECTOR/AWR/ETC...will only make new accounts and come at people with differing attitudes to ensure they get the attention they seek like little troll whores. So, nearly anyone can get sucked into their stupidity, at least for a short while. The best things for trolls are that little block user button. I've used it so often on the apollo believing trolls, that I can find it with my eyes closed.
@Jarrah: whoever your detractors are, they are now desperately finding other ways to attack you behind. they obviously have no balls facing your arguments - they even hide behind aliases! what a pity.
Watch this while you can. Have just received a threat of copyright over showing screenshots of his website. I will be filing a complaint with YouTube over this matter.
@receiver69 robot , i fail to see how my comment confirmed your theory, and im sure you'll come up with some scathing comment juat as long winded and redundant as taht theory you pulled out of your ass,as to how i missed your point ,but just put the theory back .if your arguments were so strong , you wouldnt have to resort to your silly lil attacks to get your point across :D
He attacks you Jarrah because he cant confront you with ARGUMENTS, so he goes on "asshole mode" and acts like a fucking retard, a typical brain damage guy!
i do not think that the moon landing was a hoax, however it really ticks me off that people will try to disprove others theories on the soul fact they don't agree and use nonsense to prove the theories and opinions wrong and end up only proving how stupid they are themselves. Way to go man, for putting all this crap out in the open.
I have a saying, "If it wasnt fake, then why would people say it was?" We know we can go to space, we know we can land a rover on Mars and launch satellites deep into space and orbiting space stations and telescopes. No one questions those, but why the Moon? If we can go to the Moon, why cant we go now? Funds? Nah, we spent $20+ Trillion on a pointless war, think we could afford a Moon Landing...
Jarrah rapes because when someone says something passive aggressive and thinks they will get away with it without being noticed, White makes an entire video showing it. lol
Apollogist trolls are desperate little losers who have no life outside of spewing lies about conspirarcy researchers like Ralph Rene and Jarrah White.
@straydog02 This is just an assumption on your part, especially coming from someone whose comments mostly contain calling someone who criticizes the moon hoax theory as a troll, propagandist, liar, loser, etc.
To give my opinions on the Subject: For one, I don't believe Jarrah, even without being attacked and berated, wouldn't have made it on Wikipedia. He's only really popular among a small pocket of people, and hasn't really made any impact that warrants an article. I know this, because for the longest time, Wikipedia didn't allow a page for the Musician "Dr.Steel" until just recently (And that guy has a pretty good sized following behind him.)
@Zeta39Reticuli This isn't to criticize Jarrah or the party in question, I'm just stating that even if someone wanted to, I don't think Jarrah would ever have a wikipedia article. I believe the only reason why the older moon hoax believers have articles is because they have done major appearances and/or stirred up the media a few times.
And as far as the rest of the video is concerned, you make this long diatribe about how the propagandists are labeling you and insulting you...
@Zeta39Reticuli (Con) But in the process, you've managed to insult and try to discredit every opponent you've come across as lying and deceitful, even if the said opponent is neither of those things, effectively "poisoning the well" on just about anyone whose made even a single video on your work, Jarrah. And this isn't a new practice for you. Take Phil Webb for example. Every time you feel misquoted, or feel you've been taken out of context, you...
@Zeta39Reticuli (continued) You automatically assume that he deliberately took you out of context to discredit you, and you thus make an entire series of rebuttals to his claims not really based around what he's brought to the table, but around the assumption that he just wants to make you look bad. It makes you look like you have nothing of value to refute his claims, and have to rely on playing the victim to gain any credence.
@Zeta39Reticuli (continued) Which, I can't say for certain, I don't know you personally.
As for your "peer reviewer", lol. Just lol. Sorry, but all this says is "I'm dancing around the demands of my opponents". your work to garner any kind of credibility with me, Windley,Webb, Luke, or any other critic of your work, you'll have to do better than "I have some anonymous guy who looks over my work". Submit your work to a third party that BOTH you and your opponents agree on. Not some guy who
@Zeta39Reticuli (continued) Not some guy who we have to speculate is even real or not.
In closing, I'm going to focus on your encounters with Savage and Plait. It's not that you had clearance to attend there, it's not that as a "documentary filmmaker" you had the right to interview them, but your actions alone scared off any potential chance you had to talk to both of those men extensively. You might not understand it, but jumping on people and demanding answers from them..
@Zeta39Reticuli (continued) is only going to make them more likely to ignore you than it is to get questions. You were rude and aggressive, and this was the reason why they had such bad opinions of you, as did the rest of the critics of your work. The only people who thought it was anything substantial are the paranoid guys who think 9/11 is an inside job and that reptilians are trying to take over the world.
Alike everyone else, René was sometimes right, sometimes wrong. But he was heck of a lot of smarter than you or I! His ability to even suggest improvements or errors to Einstein's, Newton's or Archimede's works, and present his own theories about it, vastly exceeds what common joes of the street are capable of. Tons of brilliant scientists were wrong sometimes. You go attacking Stephen Hawkings and Einstein of their errors, too? Yeah they were wrong. Einstein goofed plenty of times.
@Aurinkohirvi Uh, Einstein's theory of general relativity was recently proven to an extraordinary level of accuracy -- right here on Earth. Two ultra precise atomic clocks, one set up on a table. Then one clock was raised by one foot. It recorded the difference in time, just as predicted, when it was moved one foot further away than the other clock from the Earth's gravitational well.
@Aurinkohirvi Well, to actually measure Earth's gravitational well from right here on the Earth and confirming Einstein's theory of relativity to very high precision, pretty much blows Ralph Rene's theory out of the water that Einstein was wrong.
"His ability to even suggest improvements or errors to Einstein's, Newton's or Archimede's works..."
- are you serious, Aurinkohirvi? LOL!
It is no surprise at all to see all those hoax dumbasses leaving their usual comments every time JW makes another garbage video, but your comment is beyond usual level of stupidity.
Even trying to draw a line between those great scientists and Ralph Rene is uttery wrong and idiotic!
Yeah. It's OK if other mathematicians and physics theorists make mistakes, but for René it isn't. I quite understand your stance - but don't agree with it and find it cheap.
I already watched Astrobrand2's video about René's mistakes, and made a few comments there. I did not know any of René's studies before watching the video, but some cases which AB2 listed as his mistakes, actually were not mistakes at all. But then, like Einstein or René, also AB2 and we all make mistakes!
Again, you don't even know what you're talking about.
Try to realize that real scientists work on level which is completely beyond anything that Rene was ever able to understand!
Rene didn't even understand Archimedes' principle which was formed more than 2,000 years ago! He didn't understand Newton's Universal Law of Gravitation either and made idiotic claims about Moon not falling to the Sun as it should if Newton's laws were correct...
You gotta snap out of this: "people are pathetic"-syndrome. It doesn't become you. It doesn't become anyone. And you aren't any better. Try to tolerate people and their ideas. Understand that you are not the crown of all existing.
Oh I do, and what I learnt of René, is that he was a real smart person with interest to amazinly varying areas. And that he wasn't wrong in all the cases AB2 claimed he was.
wow, sounds like someone is jealous. and defending (their) imaginary moon trips? p.s. hope I get to watch some more of your stuff with (you) in them.. you have made some very thought provoking vids,.. . good job
Wikipedia itself, and Wikipedia vandalism are an endlessly fascinating topic to me. I mean, we all know it's going to end up becoming the common man's encyclopedia in the future. It's already become an entrenched part of modern American culture. The first generation to really be entirely raised in the online community their whole lives have anointed it "the thing we go to to look up anything we aren't familiar with". That's fascinating to me. Anyone else? The old media hates them.
LanceHertford 1 week ago
I listened to the first 5 seconds . . .
. . . he sounds like poop
mohammadjawad01 1 month ago
Comment removed
mohammadjawad01 1 month ago
Wikipedia is "pro-NASA" because it favors reality over the nonsense that you prefer.
The true "propagandists" are the moon hoax advocates. The true "sheep" are the moon hoax believers.
edmfw 6 months ago
Although I agree with Rene on the moon landings, I must admit some of his theories were flawed. I hope I have not offended you or any of Rene's family and friends.
He was a good man.
yesiamawizardjonny 7 months ago
Wikipedia's totally corrupt crew, composed of internet warriors, spreads all sorts of propaganda through their 'neutral' articles. Any edit I've made so far was labelled as 'vandalism' without any explanation.
IntercityAPT 8 months ago
your voice makes me want to SMACK YOU!!
TheFanta913 11 months ago
Propagandist ... Shills ...??? Hahahaha HOHOHO
I'm afraid the court of public opinion is against you hoaxers, so it's really you who are the propagandist and shills selling this crap. Apollo was bought and paid for 40 years ago, there's nothing to sell or buy if you believe in the landings. Nice try, to bad ...really funny, the irony is beyond belief !
Tweekerhead 1 year ago
Comment removed
rockinsparzy105 1 year ago
Which of Ralph Rene's scientific theories are accurate?
davewatcher 1 year ago
Don't you get it? you're supposed to have faith in science. It is blasphemus to question whatever science is the current vogue.
preparehandbook 1 year ago
The vandal's handle is
lukepemberton1975
marocon60 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Hey everyone, someone in Finland -
213.139.172.66
- had vandalised the Old English Wikipedia Vandalism page!
h t t p : / / a n g . w i k i p e d i a . o r g / w / i n d e x . p h p ? t i t l e = W i k i p e d i a : B e a l u & o l d i d = 1 0 4 3 1 6
I thought it was semiprotected, but I guess I was wrong. This guy has vandalised several other pages and has been warned repeatedly.
Does anyone know how to block someone?
marocon60 1 year ago
@receiver69,
Well if you say so how am I to tell you wrong.
Peace to you
awe130 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@receiver69
Coicidence against conspiracy
Lets start with the the Federal reserve bank, which became in existance in 1913 by a coup d'état.
It will end in 2013 by a controlled demolition of the economy.
quantitative easing ???? Don't make me laugh. Its the end of the dollar
WAIT AND SEE .................!!
Luiwerwimmes 1 year ago
Comment removed
Luiwerwimmes 1 year ago
@receiver69
Again: History is the result of of rivaling and competing conspiracies, put in place, through the ages.
The present fight is between "coincidence believers" and "conspiracy believers"
This fight will be always lost by "coincidence believers"
Coincidence does not exist
Bye the way: Coincidence believers like to make up new words like: troofers
Sorry, this lexeme is not in my dictionary ...........................!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Luiwerwimmes 1 year ago
@receiver69,
If it was only my Question NASA refuse to answer you would have a point. You seem quite angry that I doubt that Apollo put a man on the moon, it wonders me why that is with many NASA supporters this attacking mode against everyone that thinks different. It almost seems like a religion to those Apollo worshippers.
Peace to you
awe130 1 year ago
@receiver69,
As always I will state "I doubt Apollo put a man on the moon". But to state that NASA fears the question I have proof to you. See my Question to NASA about the statement of Colonel Philip Corso. If they do not fear my question NASA would had answered my question. That is why the whisper gets murmur.
Peace to you
awe130 1 year ago
I see the trolls hate to post on comment sections which detail them in length!
un4g1v3n1 1 year ago
I've just bothered to watch this and all I have to say is : Cry me a river Jarrah.
markjh2005 1 year ago
Troll profile conclusion: So, simply stated Jarrah, when you engage these trolls, their will be no change in their deluded, and ignorant states of mind. The only thing they get when you entertain them with attention, is a tiny, wittle, boner. The other reason they are on the net all the time, instead of trying to go out and date. They are afraid of the same ridicule they received in gym class, as they struggled to grow hair, and lose pimples. The same pimple their penis was mistaken for.
un4g1v3n1 1 year ago
@un4g1v3n1 wow what a great "Troll Profile" observation! This should be mandatory to read - before you can create a youtube account!! lol
Your videos are among the best when it comes to the fake moon missions! Keep it up.
Gigaloader 1 year ago
Troll Profile continued: Most trolls suffering from feelings of inadequacy, are usually correct about those feelings. From tiny penises, to low IQ's, trolls of this nature are usually very confused about their sexuality. Whatever sexual needs they have, have to be taken into their own hands, or else they must pay professionals to do it for them. Usually they live in a constant state of betrayal. From their mothers, to their employers, they have no moral compass, in any of their relationships.
un4g1v3n1 1 year ago
Psychological Profile for your favorite troll Jarrah:
YT users who use mutliple sockpuppet accounts to support their own twisted beliefs, are at a minimum, suffering from a desire to be felt as important. Since everyone in their physical life either ignores, or makes fun of them, it's important they create alternative persona's online, to feel as if they matter. A constant nagging feeling that they would be better off dead, is usually not only true, but usually wished for by thier family.
un4g1v3n1 1 year ago
Hey Jarrah. I think I figured out your troll problem. The one here using receiver, is one and the same with the many others. But that's not the problem. The problem is this psycho troll/cop, is constantly razzed at work for believing in Apollo, and of course, for being into men, instead of women. So, Rob/Receiver/luke/?/?/?/?/?/? has a huge crush on you, and like schoolyard children, keeps picking on you, due to it. I had a friend do a profile on him, based on his channel and comments.
un4g1v3n1 1 year ago
For those paying attention....You'll see a desperate, attention whore on this video comment section, attempting to engage an actual human being (myself), by using what he mistakenly believes is my first name. The only funnier then him trying to engage me, is watching him continue to use a name, he falsely believes is mine.
Everyone would be better off if they just ignored him. He would go apeshit eventually and go live under a different bridge.
HINT!
un4g1v3n1 1 year ago
@receiver69
"This video has been watched by 500+ viewers. So yes, I think the Moonlandings were therefore faked."
If that number includes how many times you and your silly sockpuppets have watched this video, then it doesn't count.
But at least you got one thing right, Rob .. The moonlandings were definately faked .. Jarrah alone has proven that fact many times over... Which of course explains why you spew your apollogist troll nonsense on his chanel 24/7.
straydog02 1 year ago
@receiver69 robot , it makes sence that you dont need any argument ,your not here to sway the doubts of others to your side,but you look down on those who doubt, your here to point out those with whom you rabidly disagree, and to spread your feces about as you do. open discourse on the subject takes a level of compasion,which frankly robots lack :( doubt and dissent are not detrimental to the truth ,if you were any thing but a silly troll youd know taht :D oh and i find robot fits you to a T :D
thegreatpoupon 1 year ago
Auri, You'll find more time, and pleasure ignoring trolls who intentionally provoke negative energy creation. Laugh at them. Then ignore them. They hate that!
Fresh out of billy goat meat, and they'll find new hunting grounds!
BH, Receiver, Rob, Svector...combosockpuppet trolls deserve no attention.
NONE!
un4g1v3n1 1 year ago
@un4g1v3n1 ops ive been feeding the trolls :O my bad :D
thegreatpoupon 1 year ago
@thegreatpoupon No problem...ROB/SVECTOR/AWR/ETC...will only make new accounts and come at people with differing attitudes to ensure they get the attention they seek like little troll whores. So, nearly anyone can get sucked into their stupidity, at least for a short while. The best things for trolls are that little block user button. I've used it so often on the apollo believing trolls, that I can find it with my eyes closed.
un4g1v3n1 1 year ago
@Jarrah: whoever your detractors are, they are now desperately finding other ways to attack you behind. they obviously have no balls facing your arguments - they even hide behind aliases! what a pity.
keep it up Jarrah!
EVDaniken08 1 year ago
Watch this while you can. Have just received a threat of copyright over showing screenshots of his website. I will be filing a complaint with YouTube over this matter.
WhiteJarrah 1 year ago
@WhiteJarrah Never surrender, mate, you are on the right track. We support you and the truth.
petrone2006rosario 1 year ago
@WhiteJarrah
There is an Australian, JOHN COSTELLA , who is an absolute connoisseur of films, photo's and lenses.
He studies the assasination of J.F. Kennedy and especially the Zapruder film
Google: Zapruder Fakery, John Costella .... and you will understand his formidable knowledge.
Maybe he can take a look at the moon photo's.
By the way: History is the result of of rivaling and competing conspiracies, put in place, through the ages.
Greetings: Luiwerwimmes
Luiwerwimmes 1 year ago
@receiver69 robot , i fail to see how my comment confirmed your theory, and im sure you'll come up with some scathing comment juat as long winded and redundant as taht theory you pulled out of your ass,as to how i missed your point ,but just put the theory back .if your arguments were so strong , you wouldnt have to resort to your silly lil attacks to get your point across :D
thegreatpoupon 1 year ago
He attacks you Jarrah because he cant confront you with ARGUMENTS, so he goes on "asshole mode" and acts like a fucking retard, a typical brain damage guy!
22700p 1 year ago
All truth-tellers, like Ralph René and numerous others, will always be tormented by all kinds of total assholes!
play69ball 1 year ago
i do not think that the moon landing was a hoax, however it really ticks me off that people will try to disprove others theories on the soul fact they don't agree and use nonsense to prove the theories and opinions wrong and end up only proving how stupid they are themselves. Way to go man, for putting all this crap out in the open.
Bdillio97 1 year ago
Jarrah White does it once again. Cleaning up the lies people try and pull off and make them look like complete asses to boot.
cooldude56g 1 year ago
I have a saying, "If it wasnt fake, then why would people say it was?" We know we can go to space, we know we can land a rover on Mars and launch satellites deep into space and orbiting space stations and telescopes. No one questions those, but why the Moon? If we can go to the Moon, why cant we go now? Funds? Nah, we spent $20+ Trillion on a pointless war, think we could afford a Moon Landing...
BigJoeker 1 year ago
Jarrah rapes because when someone says something passive aggressive and thinks they will get away with it without being noticed, White makes an entire video showing it. lol
its fuckin great man
TheBlitz1 1 year ago
There are certain topics that wikipedia is not a good source for, when looking for serious information.
elvisinpersonator 1 year ago
@receiver69
"To think that NASA would give a crap about some YT videos from some Australian moonhoax conspiracist? "
So if NASA doesn't give a crap about some Australian moonhoax conspiracist, why do you spend your entire life obsessing about him?
"Delusions of grandeur comes to mind. So does Oedipal Narcissism."
Psychological projection comes to mind... So does character assassination of someone you obviously fear, you transparent apollogist troll.
straydog02 1 year ago
@receiver69
Apollogist trolls are desperate little losers who have no life outside of spewing lies about conspirarcy researchers like Ralph Rene and Jarrah White.
straydog02 1 year ago
@straydog02 This is just an assumption on your part, especially coming from someone whose comments mostly contain calling someone who criticizes the moon hoax theory as a troll, propagandist, liar, loser, etc.
Lol.
Zeta39Reticuli 1 year ago
@receiver69,
You are right they fear the facts, as shown by man of us.
Peace to you
awe130 1 year ago
Jarrah, when you step into the orthodox bullypit called the internet and voice an anti-orthodox view, this is what you get. Get used to it.
SounzNice 1 year ago
To give my opinions on the Subject: For one, I don't believe Jarrah, even without being attacked and berated, wouldn't have made it on Wikipedia. He's only really popular among a small pocket of people, and hasn't really made any impact that warrants an article. I know this, because for the longest time, Wikipedia didn't allow a page for the Musician "Dr.Steel" until just recently (And that guy has a pretty good sized following behind him.)
Zeta39Reticuli 1 year ago
@Zeta39Reticuli This isn't to criticize Jarrah or the party in question, I'm just stating that even if someone wanted to, I don't think Jarrah would ever have a wikipedia article. I believe the only reason why the older moon hoax believers have articles is because they have done major appearances and/or stirred up the media a few times.
And as far as the rest of the video is concerned, you make this long diatribe about how the propagandists are labeling you and insulting you...
Zeta39Reticuli 1 year ago
@Zeta39Reticuli (Con) But in the process, you've managed to insult and try to discredit every opponent you've come across as lying and deceitful, even if the said opponent is neither of those things, effectively "poisoning the well" on just about anyone whose made even a single video on your work, Jarrah. And this isn't a new practice for you. Take Phil Webb for example. Every time you feel misquoted, or feel you've been taken out of context, you...
Zeta39Reticuli 1 year ago
@Zeta39Reticuli (continued) You automatically assume that he deliberately took you out of context to discredit you, and you thus make an entire series of rebuttals to his claims not really based around what he's brought to the table, but around the assumption that he just wants to make you look bad. It makes you look like you have nothing of value to refute his claims, and have to rely on playing the victim to gain any credence.
Zeta39Reticuli 1 year ago
@Zeta39Reticuli (continued) Which, I can't say for certain, I don't know you personally.
As for your "peer reviewer", lol. Just lol. Sorry, but all this says is "I'm dancing around the demands of my opponents". your work to garner any kind of credibility with me, Windley,Webb, Luke, or any other critic of your work, you'll have to do better than "I have some anonymous guy who looks over my work". Submit your work to a third party that BOTH you and your opponents agree on. Not some guy who
Zeta39Reticuli 1 year ago
@Zeta39Reticuli (continued) Not some guy who we have to speculate is even real or not.
In closing, I'm going to focus on your encounters with Savage and Plait. It's not that you had clearance to attend there, it's not that as a "documentary filmmaker" you had the right to interview them, but your actions alone scared off any potential chance you had to talk to both of those men extensively. You might not understand it, but jumping on people and demanding answers from them..
Zeta39Reticuli 1 year ago
@Zeta39Reticuli (continued) is only going to make them more likely to ignore you than it is to get questions. You were rude and aggressive, and this was the reason why they had such bad opinions of you, as did the rest of the critics of your work. The only people who thought it was anything substantial are the paranoid guys who think 9/11 is an inside job and that reptilians are trying to take over the world.
Just my opinion.
Zeta39Reticuli 1 year ago
@Zeta39Reticuli Are you a troll too?
Koppurointi 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Koppurointi You can call me whatever you want, honestly.
Zeta39Reticuli 1 year ago
way to rip this guy a new one, keep up the work and never coward away
smnaotrt 1 year ago
I vote you keep up the great work, Jarrah. :-)
nameofthepen 1 year ago
NASA fears questions, they sit in the corner like a rabbit caught in the headlights.
They fear you Jarrah.
Peace to you
awe130 1 year ago
You're a bright beacon of honest documentation, Jarrah. Keep it coming.
flytomars2012 1 year ago
fuck plait! I swear I believe he also goes on the abovetopsecret forums and is known as Phage.
dragnet53 1 year ago
@receiver69
OMG I Just have to say ROFLMFAO!!!!!
You people can't even go back because technology has increased and tracking stuff has been made easier. Go play in the radiation belt son.
dragnet53 1 year ago
@receiver69
Alike everyone else, René was sometimes right, sometimes wrong. But he was heck of a lot of smarter than you or I! His ability to even suggest improvements or errors to Einstein's, Newton's or Archimede's works, and present his own theories about it, vastly exceeds what common joes of the street are capable of. Tons of brilliant scientists were wrong sometimes. You go attacking Stephen Hawkings and Einstein of their errors, too? Yeah they were wrong. Einstein goofed plenty of times.
Aurinkohirvi 1 year ago
@Aurinkohirvi Uh, Einstein's theory of general relativity was recently proven to an extraordinary level of accuracy -- right here on Earth. Two ultra precise atomic clocks, one set up on a table. Then one clock was raised by one foot. It recorded the difference in time, just as predicted, when it was moved one foot further away than the other clock from the Earth's gravitational well.
GoneToPlaid 1 year ago
@GoneToPlaid
Yeah I know. Heard it many times before, so I'm surprised the experiment is in the news now - thought it's old news. But what about it?
Aurinkohirvi 1 year ago
@Aurinkohirvi Well, to actually measure Earth's gravitational well from right here on the Earth and confirming Einstein's theory of relativity to very high precision, pretty much blows Ralph Rene's theory out of the water that Einstein was wrong.
GoneToPlaid 1 year ago
@GoneToPlaid
Read my comment again please, and don't twist me meaning something I clearly did not.
Aurinkohirvi 1 year ago
@Aurinkohirvi Rene's "ability" to suggest errors to Einstein's theories was due to Rene's inability to understand Einstein's theories.
GoneToPlaid 1 year ago
"His ability to even suggest improvements or errors to Einstein's, Newton's or Archimede's works..."
- are you serious, Aurinkohirvi? LOL!
It is no surprise at all to see all those hoax dumbasses leaving their usual comments every time JW makes another garbage video, but your comment is beyond usual level of stupidity.
Even trying to draw a line between those great scientists and Ralph Rene is uttery wrong and idiotic!
>
BlisterHiker 1 year ago
@BlisterHiker
Yeah. It's OK if other mathematicians and physics theorists make mistakes, but for René it isn't. I quite understand your stance - but don't agree with it and find it cheap.
I already watched Astrobrand2's video about René's mistakes, and made a few comments there. I did not know any of René's studies before watching the video, but some cases which AB2 listed as his mistakes, actually were not mistakes at all. But then, like Einstein or René, also AB2 and we all make mistakes!
Aurinkohirvi 1 year ago
@Aurinkohirvi
Again, you don't even know what you're talking about.
Try to realize that real scientists work on level which is completely beyond anything that Rene was ever able to understand!
Rene didn't even understand Archimedes' principle which was formed more than 2,000 years ago! He didn't understand Newton's Universal Law of Gravitation either and made idiotic claims about Moon not falling to the Sun as it should if Newton's laws were correct...
You are pathetic, just like Rene was.
BlisterHiker 1 year ago
@BlisterHiker
You gotta snap out of this: "people are pathetic"-syndrome. It doesn't become you. It doesn't become anyone. And you aren't any better. Try to tolerate people and their ideas. Understand that you are not the crown of all existing.
Aurinkohirvi 1 year ago
@Aurinkohirvi
I have no problems with people who have different views and different ideas, but I have problems with liars and delusionals.
Do you have elementary education? I'm not sure.
If you paid attention in elementary school, you'd already know enough to see how wrong and delusional Rene was, but you are defending him instead!
Enough of that. I suggest you reach for elementary physics book and confront it with claims of Rene.
Educate yourself, Aurinkohirvi.
BlisterHiker 1 year ago
@BlisterHiker
Oh I do, and what I learnt of René, is that he was a real smart person with interest to amazinly varying areas. And that he wasn't wrong in all the cases AB2 claimed he was.
Aurinkohirvi 1 year ago
@Aurinkohirvi >
To learn more about Rene's fundamental errors and ignorance, watch these videos:
watch?v=x4eu6Ed9ffM
watch?v=aZduVemzA_w
watch?v=5S34Rm_62rI
watch?v=Hco45IDhCbw
If you seriously believe Rene found some errors in laws of physics, then you must be as delusional and ignorant as he was.
BlisterHiker 1 year ago
Intellectual ownage I would say
colloredbrothers 1 year ago
@receiver69 always "nice" to see the robots responding with such haste :D
thegreatpoupon 1 year ago
wow, sounds like someone is jealous. and defending (their) imaginary moon trips? p.s. hope I get to watch some more of your stuff with (you) in them.. you have made some very thought provoking vids,.. . good job
SPAGHETTIMONSTER1 1 year ago
i like your voice and the way you say propaganda/ist in your last video with buzz aldrin.
ValidPlacebo 1 year ago