Killing was probably ordered. Maybe she was on Stockholm syndrome and agreeing with her captors and that presented to the kill team as a reason to kill her that the military maintain the propaganda that the people they're fighting over there are disageeable. Maybe she got an earful bout US brutality and had made up her mind to stance against the war. Hostage rescue situations NEVER call for throwing frag grenades into an unchecked room, especially in the compound the rescue's supposed to happen.
David Camer On? What a sh*t choice of doppleganger. Guy doesn't even have a dimple on his chin. Why's MI6 getting so cheap with the plastic surgery. Crazy. Plus his jowl isn't full of funk obviously as Camer On's seems certainly. Search this on google and tell me these 2 are the same guy: david cameron inplaceoffear
@Tree0rnament The Iranian embassy was a success but the American Iranian embassy siege (Operation Eagle Claw) was a failure,SAS basically ended the First Gulf war,SAS basically won the Falklands war.....FACT.....What has the American special forces acheived? NOTHING."In 2005 a British bodyguard, David Addison, was killed by his Taliban captors as US special forces stormed the compound where he was being held."- Source Telegraph
@Tree0rnament The Iranian embassy was a success but the American Iranian embassy siege (Operation Eagle Claw) was a failure,SAS basically ended the First Gulf war,SAS basically won the Falklands war.....FACT.....What has the American special forces acheived? NOTHING."In 2005 a British bodyguard, David Addison, was killed by his Taliban captors as US special forces stormed the compound where he was being held."
simple as US special forces are no way as good as Uk special forces and i think this proves it. im not saying us special forces suck by wdf SAS executed the iranian embassy siege and that was 2 decades ago. 20 years later us cant rescue one wdf. why did we send in americans to do our work wdf.
@WolveZGuY SAS/SBS has some screws up too. In 2009 during a stephen farrall rescue, SBS accidently killed munadi, afghan women, and child not only that but one SBS was killed at that raid. An Afgan guy said that women and child was killed when SAS/SBS used explosive(really?) to blow up a door. In 2007, a joint op between Italian SF and SBS to rescue of Lorenzo D' Auria and 2 Italian hostage, an SBS shot 3 of them, killing Lorenzo and 2 injured. no one perfect. we have plenty of successes too.
@WolveZGuY Didn't an SAS operator receive burns during the Iranian embassy siege after getting caught in his gear, and having a friendly SAS operators flash-bang light the drapes on fire?
@Tree0rnament The Iranian embassy was a success but the American Iranian embassy siege (Operation Eagle Claw) was a failure,SAS basically ended the First Gulf war,SAS basically won the Falklands war.....FACT.....What has the American special forces acheived? NOTHING."In 2005 a British bodyguard, David Addison, was killed by his Taliban captors as US special forces stormed the compound where he was being held."
this is why aid workers shouldnt be there, they are trying to help those people in a country that dosnt want them there. ...and when you get kidnapped, then someone has to risk their life to come and try to save you. Shit happens everyday, its war, mistakes happen. People seem to forget that these guys didnt have to go and put their life on the line for her, they all went by choice knowning that if they didnt she would be dead, and they did their best to try and save her.
@dkbm95 SAS rescue attempt to save reporter Stephen Farrell and his translator Sultan Munadi, The SBS went in shot Munadi, and killed a woman, a child, and one SBS soldier was killed during the raid. everyone make mistakes.
@BritsSuck yep everyone makes mistakes. But that operation to save Farrell was a combined op with Afghan forces,maybe Afghan shot him...maybe SBS. I know who I would put my money on.
Munadi was exiting the building when shot..mistaken identity?
@banoffee2001 ye most of the time you will get teams of US SF working with UK SF in afghan just like in battle at qala-l-jangi were 9 US SF and 6 sbs worked together in the 1 of the navy seals was attached to the british sbs and about 400 taliban was killed but there was also afghan forces there aswell
@wiganerrmc The Brits and US seem to work well together. I just get so pissed off when we get dissed by Americans...they come to us for help. Just another thing..the guy I know in the forces was talking to 2 SAS guys and asking them what they did about exercise. They said.." we do enough every day, we are clearing atleast 8 compound walls a day" Just got to admire them.
@banoffee2001 is your mate in forces i worked along side seals and SBS im a royal marine commando and i get pissed sometimes whem americans who have never done a day in military think thay no everything and calling british forces
@banoffee2001 ye i was just wondering if he was in the forces because SAS wouldn't of able to tell him that thay was SAS if he was a civvy. these SBS blokes at my barracks im in 42cdo aswell
@BritsSuck ye shit happens but this shouldnt of happend the navy seal tossed a fragmentation grenade into the compound where norgrove was being held, thinking it was a smoke grenade. but this guy was part of seal team 6 ment be 1 of the best if not the best hostage rescue force in america and you dont make mistakes like that but iv worked along side navy seals once in afghan and thay was very professional but that was a major fuck up
@BritsSuck and the translator Sultan Munadi was killed by a 7.62 round which thay sey was from a ak-47 plus you do no US special forces helped in the rescue and your wrong there no SAS or SBS died it was a para from 1 para which is SFSG plus the women could of been killed by taliban or even afghan forces because iv worked with them and thay are very triger happy and are always stoned
@wiganerrmc where did you get your info from that munadi was killed by 7.62? what link? I think Stephen Farrell stated numerous times that Munadi led way to escape zone in the direction of the SBS when he was shot down. By amount of times he was shot it is widely believed that he was killed by the SBS due the fact it came from NATO round. he just said that. yes a women and child was killed by SBS. An Afghan stated that a women a child was killed when SBS used explosives to blow up a door.
@BritsSuck ye shit happens but this shouldnt of happend the navy seal tossed a fragmentation grenade into the compound where norgrove was being held, thinking it was a smoke grenade. but this guy was part of seal team 6 ment be 1 of the best if not the best hostage rescue force in america and you dont make mistakes like that but iv worked along side navy seals once in afghan and thay was very professional but that was a major fuck up
@freaknbigpanda Whatever you say buddy, ALL special forces in the world are based on the SAS, we have the privilage to say SAS train our special forces (which is an honour) and i'm positive they have their own tricks they dont share with us. Dont give our countrymen and women bad names for being so patriotic, the British are like a father to us. God bless America and God save the queen!
Knowing Afghan Mentality as a Pakistani, It Can Be Said That The Moment You Confront Them, You are On a Losing Side!! Probably Negotiations Through Afghan Elders Could Have Saved Poor Linda's Life!!
Why didnt they just shoot the bad guys and win? Life isnt like that? She got killed but she knew the risk going out there. Kudo's to the guys who tried to save her she was good as dead if they didnt. We have never and would never negotiate or pay a ransome so she was dead if they didnt get her when they had the chance. They risked thier own necks and did thier best. Who can ask more? An asshole can.
Poor woman, she should never have been out there in the first place. I still cannot understand why the people out there are incapable of doing any work for themselves.
If you want to learn the philosophy behind the taliban watch the critical analysis of the cult of mohammed here ----> youtube /user/CloningIsFun
Wow our special forces are completely useless, why did the UK send US special forces in? The SAS are highly more trained then our SF. WHY WAS A GRENADE THROWN IN A HOSTAGE SITUATION, WOW RETARDATION.
@GingersAreFags1 Ever been in a fire fight? Ever been shot at? I guess not. Should have let her get her head chopped off on Youtube. Then we could blame the US for not saving her right?
@GingersAreFags1 They sent them because the SEALS have superior knowledge of the area and people as it is where the Americans have been based for the last 5 years. The SAS were helping the SEALS to prepare for the mission though. I completely agree with you though. I'd like to think that the SAS would have got the job done much more efficiently. Also, I read an article in the times and what the SAS proposed was to send 2 attacks, 1 head on at the gate and then drop a helicopter in the middle
@GingersAreFags1 navy seal from seal team 6 tossed a fragmentation grenade into the compound where norgrove was being held, thinking it was a smoke grenade.
@GingersAreFags1 Who are you to say who is better? and if you wernt there then you have no room to speak on the actions of men who risked their life to conduct the mission. mistakes happen, take for example the iranian hostage situation where the british SAS went in to rescue hostages, two of which were wounded and one was killed during the raid.
@badkarmateam That operation had soooo many more risks than this one! They had dozens of hostages in the iranian embassy the probability was soo high that hostages were going to be injured or killed, intelligence was very blurry too. Whereas intelligence in this hostage situation was very clear, they knew where she was and where she was being held, ONE HOSTAGE the probability of injuring or killing her was soo low that we still managed to cock it up and kill her. UK SF > US SF- FACT.
@GingersAreFags1 You're an ignorant retard. Try reading up on this event. The SEALs were authorized to bring grenades b/c the chance of an ambush was high. When they stormed the compound, insurgents were coming from a gully. A gully is the last place to expect hostages. Linda Norgrove had broken away from her captors, something the SEALs were not aware of, and hid near the gully in the fetal position. Unfortunate event. Something similar could have happened to the SAS.
@Tree0rnament No it couldn't ever have happened to the SAS actually, because the SAS NEVER-EVER use live frag grenades on hostage rescue missions. Only incompetent retarded apes use frag grenades on rescue missions. You know when this mission failed? No, not during the battle. The mission failed when those cowboys decided to take live grenades on the mission rather than Flash Bang stun grenades.
Killing was probably ordered. Maybe she was on Stockholm syndrome and agreeing with her captors and that presented to the kill team as a reason to kill her that the military maintain the propaganda that the people they're fighting over there are disageeable. Maybe she got an earful bout US brutality and had made up her mind to stance against the war. Hostage rescue situations NEVER call for throwing frag grenades into an unchecked room, especially in the compound the rescue's supposed to happen.
danielvincentkelley 1 month ago
David Camer On? What a sh*t choice of doppleganger. Guy doesn't even have a dimple on his chin. Why's MI6 getting so cheap with the plastic surgery. Crazy. Plus his jowl isn't full of funk obviously as Camer On's seems certainly. Search this on google and tell me these 2 are the same guy: david cameron inplaceoffear
danielvincentkelley 1 month ago
@Tree0rnament The Iranian embassy was a success but the American Iranian embassy siege (Operation Eagle Claw) was a failure,SAS basically ended the First Gulf war,SAS basically won the Falklands war.....FACT.....What has the American special forces acheived? NOTHING."In 2005 a British bodyguard, David Addison, was killed by his Taliban captors as US special forces stormed the compound where he was being held."- Source Telegraph
TheGameBWS09 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Tree0rnament The Iranian embassy was a success but the American Iranian embassy siege (Operation Eagle Claw) was a failure,SAS basically ended the First Gulf war,SAS basically won the Falklands war.....FACT.....What has the American special forces acheived? NOTHING."In 2005 a British bodyguard, David Addison, was killed by his Taliban captors as US special forces stormed the compound where he was being held."
TheGameBWS09 9 months ago
simple as US special forces are no way as good as Uk special forces and i think this proves it. im not saying us special forces suck by wdf SAS executed the iranian embassy siege and that was 2 decades ago. 20 years later us cant rescue one wdf. why did we send in americans to do our work wdf.
WolveZGuY 1 year ago
@WolveZGuY SAS/SBS has some screws up too. In 2009 during a stephen farrall rescue, SBS accidently killed munadi, afghan women, and child not only that but one SBS was killed at that raid. An Afgan guy said that women and child was killed when SAS/SBS used explosive(really?) to blow up a door. In 2007, a joint op between Italian SF and SBS to rescue of Lorenzo D' Auria and 2 Italian hostage, an SBS shot 3 of them, killing Lorenzo and 2 injured. no one perfect. we have plenty of successes too.
Hperman09 1 year ago 3
@WolveZGuY Didn't an SAS operator receive burns during the Iranian embassy siege after getting caught in his gear, and having a friendly SAS operators flash-bang light the drapes on fire?
Yeah, mistakes are still made by individuals...
Tree0rnament 1 year ago
@Tree0rnament The Iranian embassy was a success but the American Iranian embassy siege (Operation Eagle Claw) was a failure,SAS basically ended the First Gulf war,SAS basically won the Falklands war.....FACT.....What has the American special forces acheived? NOTHING."In 2005 a British bodyguard, David Addison, was killed by his Taliban captors as US special forces stormed the compound where he was being held."
TheGameBWS09 9 months ago
this is why aid workers shouldnt be there, they are trying to help those people in a country that dosnt want them there. ...and when you get kidnapped, then someone has to risk their life to come and try to save you. Shit happens everyday, its war, mistakes happen. People seem to forget that these guys didnt have to go and put their life on the line for her, they all went by choice knowning that if they didnt she would be dead, and they did their best to try and save her.
badkarmateam 1 year ago
@dkbm95 SAS rescue attempt to save reporter Stephen Farrell and his translator Sultan Munadi, The SBS went in shot Munadi, and killed a woman, a child, and one SBS soldier was killed during the raid. everyone make mistakes.
BritsSuck 1 year ago
@BritsSuck yep everyone makes mistakes. But that operation to save Farrell was a combined op with Afghan forces,maybe Afghan shot him...maybe SBS. I know who I would put my money on.
Munadi was exiting the building when shot..mistaken identity?
banoffee2001 1 year ago
@banoffee2001 also US SF was in the mission
wiganerrmc 1 year ago
Comment removed
banoffee2001 1 year ago
@banoffee2001 ye most of the time you will get teams of US SF working with UK SF in afghan just like in battle at qala-l-jangi were 9 US SF and 6 sbs worked together in the 1 of the navy seals was attached to the british sbs and about 400 taliban was killed but there was also afghan forces there aswell
wiganerrmc 1 year ago
@wiganerrmc The Brits and US seem to work well together. I just get so pissed off when we get dissed by Americans...they come to us for help. Just another thing..the guy I know in the forces was talking to 2 SAS guys and asking them what they did about exercise. They said.." we do enough every day, we are clearing atleast 8 compound walls a day" Just got to admire them.
banoffee2001 1 year ago
@banoffee2001 is your mate in forces i worked along side seals and SBS im a royal marine commando and i get pissed sometimes whem americans who have never done a day in military think thay no everything and calling british forces
wiganerrmc 1 year ago
Comment removed
banoffee2001 1 year ago
@banoffee2001 ye i was just wondering if he was in the forces because SAS wouldn't of able to tell him that thay was SAS if he was a civvy. these SBS blokes at my barracks im in 42cdo aswell
wiganerrmc 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@BritsSuck ye shit happens but this shouldnt of happend the navy seal tossed a fragmentation grenade into the compound where norgrove was being held, thinking it was a smoke grenade. but this guy was part of seal team 6 ment be 1 of the best if not the best hostage rescue force in america and you dont make mistakes like that but iv worked along side navy seals once in afghan and thay was very professional but that was a major fuck up
wiganerrmc 1 year ago
@BritsSuck and the translator Sultan Munadi was killed by a 7.62 round which thay sey was from a ak-47 plus you do no US special forces helped in the rescue and your wrong there no SAS or SBS died it was a para from 1 para which is SFSG plus the women could of been killed by taliban or even afghan forces because iv worked with them and thay are very triger happy and are always stoned
wiganerrmc 1 year ago
@wiganerrmc where did you get your info from that munadi was killed by 7.62? what link? I think Stephen Farrell stated numerous times that Munadi led way to escape zone in the direction of the SBS when he was shot down. By amount of times he was shot it is widely believed that he was killed by the SBS due the fact it came from NATO round. he just said that. yes a women and child was killed by SBS. An Afghan stated that a women a child was killed when SBS used explosives to blow up a door.
Hperman09 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@BritsSuck ye shit happens but this shouldnt of happend the navy seal tossed a fragmentation grenade into the compound where norgrove was being held, thinking it was a smoke grenade. but this guy was part of seal team 6 ment be 1 of the best if not the best hostage rescue force in america and you dont make mistakes like that but iv worked along side navy seals once in afghan and thay was very professional but that was a major fuck up
wiganerrmc 1 year ago
@freaknbigpanda they really proved u right didn't they ;)
aryanreaper 1 year ago
@freaknbigpanda Whatever you say buddy, ALL special forces in the world are based on the SAS, we have the privilage to say SAS train our special forces (which is an honour) and i'm positive they have their own tricks they dont share with us. Dont give our countrymen and women bad names for being so patriotic, the British are like a father to us. God bless America and God save the queen!
GingersAreFags1 1 year ago
Knowing Afghan Mentality as a Pakistani, It Can Be Said That The Moment You Confront Them, You are On a Losing Side!! Probably Negotiations Through Afghan Elders Could Have Saved Poor Linda's Life!!
Aaadil8 1 year ago
Why didnt they just shoot the bad guys and win? Life isnt like that? She got killed but she knew the risk going out there. Kudo's to the guys who tried to save her she was good as dead if they didnt. We have never and would never negotiate or pay a ransome so she was dead if they didnt get her when they had the chance. They risked thier own necks and did thier best. Who can ask more? An asshole can.
Ashbringer85 1 year ago 3
Poor woman, she should never have been out there in the first place. I still cannot understand why the people out there are incapable of doing any work for themselves.
If you want to learn the philosophy behind the taliban watch the critical analysis of the cult of mohammed here ----> youtube /user/CloningIsFun
TheAnoDomini 1 year ago
Wow our special forces are completely useless, why did the UK send US special forces in? The SAS are highly more trained then our SF. WHY WAS A GRENADE THROWN IN A HOSTAGE SITUATION, WOW RETARDATION.
GingersAreFags1 1 year ago 6
@GingersAreFags1 - I agree with that!
plagalcadenze 1 year ago
@GingersAreFags1 Ever been in a fire fight? Ever been shot at? I guess not. Should have let her get her head chopped off on Youtube. Then we could blame the US for not saving her right?
Ashbringer85 1 year ago
@GingersAreFags1 They sent them because the SEALS have superior knowledge of the area and people as it is where the Americans have been based for the last 5 years. The SAS were helping the SEALS to prepare for the mission though. I completely agree with you though. I'd like to think that the SAS would have got the job done much more efficiently. Also, I read an article in the times and what the SAS proposed was to send 2 attacks, 1 head on at the gate and then drop a helicopter in the middle
TheChadley1000 1 year ago
of the compound with an extraction team whos sole purpose was to get in and out with the hostage as fast as possible.
TheChadley1000 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@GingersAreFags1 navy seal from seal team 6 tossed a fragmentation grenade into the compound where norgrove was being held, thinking it was a smoke grenade.
wiganerrmc 1 year ago
@GingersAreFags1 Who are you to say who is better? and if you wernt there then you have no room to speak on the actions of men who risked their life to conduct the mission. mistakes happen, take for example the iranian hostage situation where the british SAS went in to rescue hostages, two of which were wounded and one was killed during the raid.
badkarmateam 1 year ago
@badkarmateam That operation had soooo many more risks than this one! They had dozens of hostages in the iranian embassy the probability was soo high that hostages were going to be injured or killed, intelligence was very blurry too. Whereas intelligence in this hostage situation was very clear, they knew where she was and where she was being held, ONE HOSTAGE the probability of injuring or killing her was soo low that we still managed to cock it up and kill her. UK SF > US SF- FACT.
GingersAreFags1 1 year ago
@GingersAreFags1 No, there were women and children in the village, and none of them were hurt.
"UK SF> US SF - FACT."
How can that be a fact when 99% of all USSF and UKSF missions remain classified?
Tree0rnament 1 year ago
Comment removed
Hperman09 11 months ago
@GingersAreFags1 You're an ignorant retard. Try reading up on this event. The SEALs were authorized to bring grenades b/c the chance of an ambush was high. When they stormed the compound, insurgents were coming from a gully. A gully is the last place to expect hostages. Linda Norgrove had broken away from her captors, something the SEALs were not aware of, and hid near the gully in the fetal position. Unfortunate event. Something similar could have happened to the SAS.
Tree0rnament 1 year ago
@Tree0rnament I thought the hostage was killed by a kidnapper in Iranian hostage siege.
Hperman09 11 months ago
@Tree0rnament No it couldn't ever have happened to the SAS actually, because the SAS NEVER-EVER use live frag grenades on hostage rescue missions. Only incompetent retarded apes use frag grenades on rescue missions. You know when this mission failed? No, not during the battle. The mission failed when those cowboys decided to take live grenades on the mission rather than Flash Bang stun grenades.
Bubo25 3 months ago